Journal Pre-proof Synthesis, photophysical properties and solvatochromic analysis of some naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derivatives
Alina Nicolescu, Anton Airinei, Emilian Georgescu, Florentina Georgescu, Radu Tigoianu, Florin Oancea, Calin Deleanu PII:
S0167-7322(19)36405-0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112626
Reference:
MOLLIQ 112626
To appear in:
Journal of Molecular Liquids
Received date:
1 December 2019
Revised date:
21 January 2020
Accepted date:
30 January 2020
Please cite this article as: A. Nicolescu, A. Airinei, E. Georgescu, et al., Synthesis, photophysical properties and solvatochromic analysis of some naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derivatives, Journal of Molecular Liquids(2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112626
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2018 Published by Elsevier.
Journal Pre-proof Synthesis, photophysical properties and solvatochromic analysis of some naphthalene1,8-dicarboxylic acid derivatives
Alina Nicolescu
a,b
, Anton Airinei a,*, Emilian Georgescu c, Florentina Georgescu d, Radu
Tigoianu a, Florin Oancea e, Calin Deleanu a,b,* a
“Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Aleea Grigore
Ghica Voda 41A, RO-700487 Iasi, Romania b
“C. D. Nenitescu” Centre of Organic Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Spl. Independentei
of
202B, RO-060023 Bucharest, Romania
Chimcomplex Research Center, St. Uzinei 1, RO-240050 Ramnicu Valcea, Romania
d
Enpro Soctech Com srl, Str. Elefterie 51, RO-050524 Bucharest, Romania
e
National Research & Development Institute for Chemistry & Petrochemistry – ICECHIM,
-p
ro
c
re
Spl. Independentei 202, RO-060021 Bucharest, Romania
ABSTRACT
lP
Two groups of new naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derived compounds, 6-amino-1,8naphthalic anhydride derivatives and 2-hydroxy-6-amino-1,8-naphthalimide derivatives, have
na
been synthesized and characterized. The spectroscopic properties of all synthesized compounds were investigated in order to be used in the field of bio-imaging studies and as
ur
intermediates for the preparation of new fluorescent bioactive compounds. Positive solvatochromism was observed from non-polar to polar solvents and it was discussed using
Jo
Catalan multilinear regression analysis. Comparative study of the photophysical characteristics of naphthalic anhydride and 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives was performed. The new naphthalic anhydride 6-(4-benzyl-piperazin-1-yl)benzo[de]isochromene-1,3-dione (3) presents the highest value of fluorescence quantum yield in solvents with lower polarities. The results demonstrate that the quantum yields values of naphthalic anhydride derivatives are higher than those of naphthalimide derivatives.
Keywords: spectroscopic properties; fluorescence; 1,8-naphthalic anhydride derivatives; 1,8naphthlimide derivatives, quantum yield; NMR
* Corresponding authors: E-mail address:
[email protected] (A. Airinei). 1
Journal Pre-proof E-mail address:
[email protected] (C. Deleanu).
1. Introduction Fluorescence has become an important method used in biotechnology, medicinal chemistry and clinical diagnostics because it offers high sensitivity and selectivity, noninvasive, real-time monitoring, rapid response and low detection limits. Fluorescent compounds have broad range of applications as key tools for chemical biology, as multipurpose dyes and photoelectric materials [1,2]. Organic fluorophores based on a naphthalene nucleus are known as dyes, fluorescent sensors and fluorescent probes [3-6].
of
Compounds containing 1,8-naphthalimide nucleus have found applications as fluorescent dyes for fibers [7-10], liquid-crystal displays [11], optical brighteners [12], photoinduced
ro
electron transfer (PET) fluorescent sensors [13-17], and fluorescent molecular probes [18-22].
-p
Many of 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives have interesting biological properties and applications [23,24]. Usually, 1,8-naphthalic anhydride derivatives are prepared by the interaction of 4-
re
nitro- or 4-halo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride with secondary amines in various reaction conditions [7,8,13,22], while 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives are synthesized by the reaction of
lP
4-nitro- or 4-halo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride with hydroxylamine or primary amines in a large variety of solvents and reaction conditions [7-9,18].
na
Continuing our researches in the field of bioactive compounds [24-31], we investigated a range of naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derived compounds which are to be
ur
used for bio-imaging investigations and intermediates for the preparation of new fluorescent bioactive compounds. Herein we report the synthesis, characterization and spectroscopic
Jo
properties of two groups of 6-amino-1,8-naphthalic anhydride derivatives and 2-hydroxy-6amino-1,8-naphthalimide derivatives.
2. Experimental 2.1. Methods Melting points were determined on a Boetius apparatus and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Impact 410 spectrometer, in KBr pellets. The NMR analyses were performed on Bruker Avance Neo spectrometers, operating either at 400.1, 100.6 and 40.6 MHz for 1H, 13C, and 15N respectively, or at 600.1, 150.9, and 60.8 MHz for 1
H, and
13
C, and
15
N respectively. The 1D and 2D spectra were recorded with 5 mm
multinuclear inverse detection z-gradient probes. Unambiguous 1D NMR signal assignments were made based on 2D NMR homo- and heteronuclear correlations. H-H COSY (Correlation 2
Journal Pre-proof Spectroscopy), H-C HSQC (Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence) and H-C HMBC (Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation) experiments were recorded using standard pulse sequences in the version with z-gradients, as delivered by Bruker with TopSpin 4.0.6 spectrometer control and processing software. Chemical shifts are reported in δ units (ppm) and were referenced to TMS for 1H nuclei (0.00 ppm), the residual solvent signals for
13
C
nuclei (CDCl3 at 77.0 ppm and DMSO-d6 at 39.4 ppm) and liquid ammonia (0.0 ppm) using nitromethane (380.2 ppm) as external standard for 15N nuclei. All reagents were commercially available products and have been used without purification. Exact molecular weights have been obtained from high resolution MS spectra recorded on a Bruker Maxis II QTOF
of
spectrometer with electrospray ionization (ESI) in the positive mode excepting for one naphtalimide derivative (5) which could be ionized only in the negative mode.
ro
Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were determined on a SPECORD
-p
200PLUS Analytik Jena spectrophotometer in 10 mm quartz cuvettes. Steady state fluorescence measurements were obtained on a Perkin Elmer LS55 luminescence
re
spectrometer using a four-side clear quartz cell with a path length of 10 mm at room temperature. The time resolved fluorescence spectra were collected on an Edinburgh FLS980
lP
spectrometer by using time-correlating single photon counting method. All emission decay profiles were determined in a 10 x 10 mm quartz cell, excited with a nanosecond diode laser
na
operating at 375 nm as light source. For all the lifetime measurements the analysis of fluorescence decays was made by a multi-exponential model as in the following relation: I(t)
ur
= Σ aiexp(-t/τi), where I(t) represents the emission intensity at time t, ai and τi are the preexponential factor and the decay time of component i, respectively. The best fitted parameters
Jo
were obtained for reduced chi-squared values close to 1 and the weighted residuals were uniform distributed around zero line. The fluorescence quantum yields were measured on a FSL980 luminescence spectrometer using an integrating sphere on dilute solutions with an absorbance below 0.1 at the excitation wavelengths corresponding to the absorption maxima.
2.2. Synthetic procedures 2.2.1. General procedure for the synthesis of 4-amino-1,8-naphthalic anhydrides (2-4) To a suspension of 3.5 g (15 mmol) 4-chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (1) in 50 mL of N-methylpyrrolidone 20 mmol of cyclic secondary amine and 3.5 mL (25 mmol) of triethylamine were added and the reaction mixture was heated at reflux temperature for 24 hour. The most part of the solvent was distilled under vacuum, 100 mL of water was added under stirring and the reaction product extracted in chloroform (3 x 150 mL). Combined 3
Journal Pre-proof extracts were dried on Na2SO4 anh., the solvent was distilled off and the residue was triturated with acetone, the solid filtered off and recrystallized from EtOH.
6-(4-Methyl-piperidin-1-yl)benzo[de]isochromene-1,3-dione (2). Orange crystals (3.63 g, 82%) with mp. 153-155 °C. 1H-NMR (600.1 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 1.04 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, CH3), 1.48-1.55 (2H, m, CH2-3‟A), 1.61-1.68 (1H, m, CH-4‟), 1.83 (2H, dd, J = 12.5, 2.0 Hz, CH2-3‟B), 2.96 (2H, td, J = 12.1, 1.7 Hz, CH2-2‟A), 3.58 (2H, d, J = 12.4 Hz, CH2-2‟B), 7.30 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-5), 7.80 (1H, t, J = 7.3 Hz, CH-8), 8.36 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH4), 8.42 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, CH-7), 8.46 (1H, dd, J = 7.3, 1.0 Hz, CH-9). 13C-NMR
of
(150.9 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 21.7 (CH3), 30.2 (CH-4‟), 33.8 (CH2-3‟), 53.0 (CH2-2‟), 110.4 (C-3a), 115.1 (CH-5), 119.1 (C-9a), 125.1 (C-6a), 126.0 (CH-8), 131.7 (C-9b), 131.9
ro
(CH-7), 132.4 (CH-9), 134.2 (CH-4), 157.3 (C-6), 160.3 (CO-3), 161.2 (CO-1).
15
N-NMR
-p
(60.8 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 76.0 (N-1‟). IR (KBr, cm-1): 2937, 1766, 1719, 1586, 1565, 1515, 1455, 1395, 1325, 1299, 1226, 1116, 1079, 1015. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M+H]+ for
re
C18H18NO3, calcd. 296.1281, found 296.1273.
lP
6-(4-Benzyl-piperidin-1-yl)benzo[de]isochromene-1,3-dione (3). Dark orange crystals (4.23 g, 76%) with mp. 195-197 °C. 1H-NMR (600.1 MHz, DMSO, δ ppm): 1.56-1.62 (2H, m,
na
CH2-3‟A), 1.77-1.84 (3H, m, CH-4‟ and CH2-3‟B), 2.66 (2H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH2), 2.93 (2H, t, J = 12.1 Hz, CH2-2‟A), 3.62 (2H, d, J = 12.2 Hz, CH2-2‟B), 7.21 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH-
ur
4”Ph), 7.25 (2H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, CH-2”Ph), 7.32 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, CH-3”Ph), 7.33 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-5), 7.84 (1H, t, J = 7.60 Hz, CH-8), 8.40 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-4), 8.44 (1H, d, J
Jo
= 8.5 Hz, CH-7), 8.50 (1H, dd, J = 7.2 Hz, CH-9). 13C-NMR (150.9 MHz, DMSO, δ ppm): 31.7 (CH2-3‟), 37.2 (CH-4‟), 42.2 (CH2), 53.0 (CH2-2‟), 110.5 (C-3a), 115.1 (CH-5), 119.2 (C-9a), 125.2 (C-6a), 125.9 (CH-4”Ph), 126.1 (CH-8), 128.3 (CH-3”Ph), 129.1 (CH-2”Ph), 131.8 (C-9b), 131.9 (CH-7), 132.4 (CH-9), 134.2 (CH-4), 140.0 (C-1”Ph), 157.3 (C-6), 160.4 (CO-3), 161.3 (CO-1). 15N-NMR (60.8 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 75.6 (N-1‟). IR (KBr, cm-1): 2920, 2843, 1763, 1728, 1562, 1514, 1451, 1377, 1305, 1229, 1179, 1080, 1017. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M+Na]+ for C24H21NO3Na, calcd. 394.1414, found 394.1429. 6-(4-Methyl-piperazin-1-yl)benzo[de]isochromene-1,3-dione (4). The preparation of this compound was already reported [28] but without separation and characterization. Pale yellow crystals (3.15 g, 71%) with mp. 194-196 °C. 1H-NMR (600.1 MHz, DMSO, δ ppm): 2.31 (3H, s, CH3), 2.65 (4H, t, J = 4.1 Hz, CH2-3‟), 3.30 (4H, t, J = 4.4 Hz, CH2-2‟), 7.36 (1H, d, J 4
Journal Pre-proof = 8.2 Hz, CH-5), 7.84 (1H, t, J = 8.5 Hz, CH-8), 8.41 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-4), 8.48 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, CH-7), 8.50 (1H, dd, J = 7.3, 1.0 Hz, CH-9). 13C-NMR (150.9 MHz, DMSO, δ ppm): 45.7 (CH3), 52.3 (CH2-2‟), 54.5 (CH2-3‟), 111.1 (C-3a), 115.2 (CH-5), 119.3 (C-9a), 125.1 (C-6a), 126.2 (CH-8), 131.7 (C-9b), 131.8 (CH-7), 132.5 (CH-9), 134.1 (CH-4), 156.6 (C-6), 160.3 (CO-3), 161.2 (CO-1).
15
N-NMR (60.8 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 36.6 (N-4‟),
-1
70.8 (N-1‟). IR (KBr, cm ): 2937, 2836, 2796, 1748, 1721, 1582, 1571, 1517, 1457, 1398, 1325, 1239, 1138, 1015. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M+H]+ for C17H17N2O3, calcd. 297.1234, found 297.1246.
of
2.2.2. General procedure for the synthesis of 2-hydroxy-4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide derivatives (5-8)
ro
To a suspension of 10 mmol of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride 1, 2, 3 or 4 in 35 mL of
-p
dioxane 1 g (14 mmol) of hydroxylamine hydrochloride and 2.76 g (20 mmol) of K2CO3 were added and the reaction mixture was heated at reflux temperature for 24 hour. The reaction
re
mixture was poured on 100 g of crushed ice and neutralized with HCl 5%. The formed solid
lP
was filtered off, washed on the filter with water and acetone and recrystallized.
2-Hydroxy-6-(4-methyl-piperidin-1-yl)benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3-dione 1
na
crystals (2.83 g, 91%) with mp. 260-262 °C (from EtOH).
(5).
Orange
H-NMR (600.1 MHz,
DMSO+TFA, δ ppm): 1.00 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, CH3), 1.47-1.55 (2H, m, CH2-3‟A), 1.59-1.63
ur
(1H, m, CH-4‟), 1.80 (2H, d, J = 11.0 Hz, CH2-3‟B), 2.90 (2H, t, J = 11.0 Hz, CH2-2‟A), 3.53 (2H, d, J = 12.1 Hz, CH2-2‟B), 7.29 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-5), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.50 Hz, CH-
Jo
8), 8.39 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-4), 8.40 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, CH-7), 8.48 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH-9). 13C-NMR (150.9 MHz, DMSO+TFA, δ ppm): 21.8 (CH3), 30.5 (CH-4‟), 34.2 (CH23‟), 53.7 (CH2-2‟), 115.4 (CH-5), 115.6 (C-3a), 123.2 (C-9a), 126.0 (C-6a), 126.1 (CH-8), 128.5 (C-9b), 130.9 (CH-9), 131.1 (CH-7), 132.7 (CH-4), 157.1 (C-6), 160.4 (CO-3), 160.8 (CO-1). 15N-NMR (60.8 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 71.1 (N-1‟). IR (KBr, cm-1): 3454, 2922, 2797, 1692, 1654, 1632, 1585, 1513, 1460, 1376, 1260, 1221, 1137, 1038. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M-H]- for C18H17N2O3, calcd. 309.1234, found 309.1244. 2-Hydroxy-6-(4-benzyl-piperidin-1-yl)benzo[de]isochromene-1,3-dione crystals (2.91 g, 75%) with mp. 227-229 °C (from EtOH).
1
(6).
Orange
H-NMR (600.1 MHz,
DMSO+TFA, δ ppm): 1.54-1.60 (2H, m, CH2-3‟A), 1.74-1.76 (3H, m, CH-4‟ and CH2-3‟B), 2.62 (2H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, CH2), 2.83 (2H, t, J = 11.5 Hz, CH2-2‟A), 3.53 (2H, d, J = 11.7 Hz, 5
Journal Pre-proof CH2-2‟B), 7.17 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, CH-4”Ph), 7.21 (2H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, CH-2”Ph), 7.26 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, CH-5), 7.28 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, CH-3”Ph), 7.77 (1H, t, J = 7.8 Hz, CH-8), 8.36 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-4), 8.38 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH-7), 8.46 (1H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, CH-9). 13
C-NMR (150.9 MHz, DMSO+TFA, δ ppm): 32.1 (CH2-3‟), 37.6 (CH-4‟), 42.6 (CH2), 53.6
(CH2-2‟), 115.3 (CH-5), 115.6 (C-3a), 123.2 (C-9a), 125.9 (C-6a), 126.1 (CH-4”Ph and CH8), 128.4 (CH-3”Ph and C-9b), 129.3 (CH-2”Ph), 130.9 (CH-9), 131.1 (CH-7), 132.6 (CH-4), 140.4 (C-1”Ph), 157.0 (C-6), 160.9 (CO-3), 161.2 (CO-1). 15N-NMR (60.8 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 71.8 (N-1‟). IR (KBr, cm-1): 3451, 2918, 2801, 1702, 1663, 1585, 1513, 1456, 1376,
of
1252, 1030. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M+Na]+ for C24H22N2O3Na, calcd. 409.1523, found 409.1526. 2-Hydroxy-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3-dione (7) [32]. Orange
ro
crystals (2.64 g, 85%) with mp. 240-242 °C (from EtOH). 1H-NMR (600.1 MHz, DMSO, δ
-p
ppm): 2.46 (3H, s, CH3), 2.87 (4H, bs, CH2-3‟), 3.32 (4H, bs, CH2-2‟), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-5), 7.82 (1H, t, J = 7.40 Hz, CH-8), 8.40 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH-4), 8.45 (1H, d, J =
re
8.5, CH-7), 8.48 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, CH-9), 9.22 (1H, bs, OH).
13
C-NMR (150.9 MHz,
DMSO, δ ppm): 44.7 (CH3), 51.6 (CH2-2‟), 53.9 (CH2-3‟), 115.4 (CH-5), 115.9 (C-3a), 122.9
lP
(C-9a), 125.4 (C-6a), 126.2 (CH-8), 127.9 (CH-9b), 130.6 (CH-7), 130.7 (CH-9), 132.2 (CH4), 155.4 (C-6), 160.4 (CO-3), 160.8 (CO-1). 15N-NMR (60.8 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 38.4
na
(N-4‟), 65.8 (N-1‟). IR (KBr, cm-1): 3418, 2956, 2845, 1700, 1664, 1581, 1455, 1394, 1361,
found 312.1346.
ur
1230, 1193, 1149, 1029, 1008. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M+H]+ for C17H18N3O3, calcd. 312.1343,
Jo
2-Hydroxy-6-chloro-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3-dione (8). Dark beige crystals (2.3 g, 93%) with mp. 213-215 °C (from CHCl3/Et2O). 1H-NMR (400.1 MHz, DMSO, δ ppm): 8.00 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz, CH-8), 8.02 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, CH-5), 8.43 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, CH-4), 8.58 (2H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, CH-7 and CH-9), 10.84 (1H, s, OH). 13C-NMR (100.6 MHz, DMSO, δ ppm): 121.8 (C-3a), 123.1 (C-10), 127.3 (C-6), 127.8 (CH-5), 128.5 (C-6a), 128.7 (CH-8), 130.2 (CH-7), 130.9 (CH-4), 131.7 (CH-9), 137.7 (C-11), 160.1 (CO-3), 160.4 (CO-1). IR (KBr, cm-1): 3416, 3097, 2910, 1708, 1687, 1656, 1570, 1467, 1396, 1241, 1189, 1030. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M+Na]+ for C12H6ClNO3Na, calcd. 269.9928, found 269.9940. HRMS-ESI (m/z): [M+H]+ for C12H7ClNO3, calcd. 248.0109, found 248.0120.
3. Results and discussion 3.1. Synthesis 6
Journal Pre-proof Two series of naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derived compounds have been synthesized starting from commercially available 4-chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride 1. The first series, formally derived from 1,8-naphthalic anhydride, was prepared by treating 4chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride 1 in N-methylpyrrolidone with cyclic secondary amines such as 4-methylpiperidine, 4-benzylpiperidine and 4-methylpiperazine, respectively, to obtain the 4-amino-1,8-naphthalic anhydride derivatives 2-4, respectively (Scheme 1). The second series of compounds, formally derived from 1,8-naphthalimide, was prepared either by the reactions of 4-amino-1,8-naphthalic anhydride compounds 2-4 with hydroxylamine hydrochloride in dioxane, under basic conditions, to access the 2-hydroxy-4-amino-1,8-naththalimides 5-7
of
respectively, or by the direct reaction of 4-chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride 1 with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to access 2-hydroxy-4-chloro-1,8-naphthalimide 8 (Scheme 1).
ro
The compounds 6-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)benzo[de]isochromene-1,3-dione 4 and 2-
-p
hydroxy-6-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3-dione 7 have been previously prepared by different synthetic procedures, but no characterization data have been reported for
re
the compound 4 while the compound 7 was only partly characterized [32]. All the other
R X
NH
lP
compounds are new, not previously reported in the literature. R X
Cl O O
2: R=Me, X=CH 3: R=benzyl, X=CH 4: R=Me, X=N
X
N N OH
K2CO3,
O 5: R=Me, X=CH 6: R=benzyl, X=CH 7: R=Me, X=N
O
Cl
H2NOH HCl
N OH
Jo
1
O
R
O
ur
O
H2NOH HCl
na
O
O
N
K2CO3,
O 8
Scheme 1. The synthetic procedures towards naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derivatives.
The structures of all synthesized compounds were assigned on the basis of chemical and spectral analysis (IR, 1H, and
13
C and
15
N NMR spectra). All 1H and
13
C NMR
assignments have been confirmed through 2D homo- and heteronuclear correlations. As a general trend, when comparing the NMR spectra for the transformation of anhydride group (from compounds 2, 3, 4) into hydroxypiperidinedione group (from compounds 5, 6, 7) there is almost no influence in the NMR spectra (less than 0.1 ppm variation in 1H chemical shifts and less than 1 ppm variation in
13
C chemical shifts) with the exception of the
7
13
C chemical
Journal Pre-proof shifts for positions 3a, 9a and 9b. Thus on the replacement of the O atom with N-OH group there is a 4 up to 5 ppm deshielding in positions 3a and 9a and a 3 ppm shielding in position 9b. Notably, even the two ketone groups in positions 1 and 2 directly linked to either O or NOH exhibit no noticeable chemical shifts differences. The molecular formula was confirmed in all cases through molecular ion detected by HR-MS. In all cases except compound 5 the compounds have been ionized either in positive mode (naphthalic anhydrides) or both in positive and negative modes (naphthalimides) whereas compound 5 revealed the molecular ion only in negative mode, i.e. by losing the proton attached to the imide group. The NMR
of
and MS spectra for compounds 2-8 are presented as Supplementary Information.
3.2. Photophysical properties
ro
In view of future exploitation of synthesized compounds 2-8 in the field of bio-
-p
imaging investigations a study of the spectroscopic properties of these compounds has been undertaken. The UV-VIS absorption spectra of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride and 1,8-
re
naphthalimide derivatives were recorded in solvents with different polarities and the spectral data are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. The absorption spectra of the six derivatives (2-4
lP
and 5-7, respectively) are rather similar, having the main absorption band located at about 390-430 nm, depending on the solvent nature. Typical absorption spectra are shown in Fig. 1
na
and Fig. 2 for naphthalic anhydride derivatives (2-4) and for naphthalimide derivatives (5-7), respectively. This absorption band from longer wavelengths can be assigned to a π-π*
ur
transition (first excited singlet, S1) [33-34] without vibrational structure. However, the presence of the methyl piperazine moiety in 4 and 7 determines a hypsochromic shift of the
Jo
absorption band around 403 nm as compared to the spectral profile of compounds 2, 3 and 5, 6 (Fig. 1 and 2). This blue shift can be caused by the decrease of coplanarity degree between the π electronic system of the naphthalene ring and the piperidine nitrogen. It is interesting to note that compounds 1 and 8 exhibit a different spectral pattern. In their electronic absorption spectra a broad absorption band with vibrational structure and a maximum around 340 was revealed (Fig. 1 and 2). The formation of the N-substituted derivatives by the reaction of 4chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride 1 is characterized by the appearance of a broad absorption band over 400 nm (Fig. 1) and the same spectral pattern was found for the naphthalimide derivatives 5-7 (Fig. 2). The absorption band from longer wavelengths of the derivatives 2-4 and 5-7 showed bathochromic shifts in function of the solvent polarity passing from a nonpolar to polar solvent (Table 1 and 2). As shown in Table 1, the absorption maximum of 2 shifted from 401 nm to 419 nm changing the solvent from toluene to DMSO. Unexpectedly, 8
Journal Pre-proof the absorption maximum for derivatives 2-4 and 5-7, respectively presents the highest red shift in dichloroethane as compared to a nonpolar solvent which is not adequated with the solvent polarity scale. The lowest red shifts were in compounds 1 and 8, suggesting a weak interaction between solute and solvent. Some fluorescence characteristics like Stokes shift (Δυ), emission wavelength (λ em), the quantum yield of fluorescence (Φ) and fluorescence lifetimes (τi) are presented in Tables 1-3. The emission bands of derivatives 2-4 and 5-7 appear in the green range at 530-545 nm, while the derivatives 1 and 8 demonstrates a violet emission at 380-410 nm (Fig. 3 and 4). Also, the presence of piperazine group in 4 and 7 indicates a slight shift to shorter
of
wavelengths of the emission maxima in the same manner as the electronic absorption spectra of 1 and 8. In Fig. 5, it can be noticed that the influence of the solvent polarity on the
ro
emission maxima is more pronounced as compared to absorption bands, the λem for 3 is
-p
shifted from 494 nm for toluene to 546 nm for DMSO. The significant red shift of the emission bands of derivatives 2-4 and 5-7 as the solvent polarity increases from non-polar to
re
polar solvents suggests that the excited state becomes highly polar and it is stabilized with increasing solvent polarity.
lP
The fluorescence quantum yields of the naphthalic anhydride and naphtalimide series were determined in different solvents and the data were collected in Table 1 and 2. The results
na
revealed that the values of the fluorescence quantum yield depend strongly on the solvent polarity. The values of fluorescence quantum yield of the substituted naphthalic anhydrides
ur
are generally much higher than those of naphthalimide derivatives. As can be seen from Table 1, derivative 3 having a benzylpiperidine group exhibit the highest fluorescence quantum
Jo
yield in nonpolar or chlorinated solvents (Φdioxane = 69.24% and ΦDCM = 91.04%). The same observation is valid for derivative 2, but here the quantum yields are lower (Φdioxane = 56.91% and ΦDCM = 65.23%). At the same time, in polar solvents the fluorescence quantum yield dramatically diminishes (ΦCH3CN = 5.83% for 2 and ΦCH3OH = 0.53% for 3). This process can be related to the specific interaction in protic solvents or alcohols between carboxylic oxygen of naphthalic anhydride and solvent in terms of hydrogen bonds. These interactions can favor non-radiative transitions which cause the decrease of the fluorescence yield. Also, some deviations of the attached phenyl moieties out the plan of naphthalene structure can lead to the decrease of the emission quantum yield. This phenomenon was reported in other papers for naphthalic anhydride and naphthalimide derivatives [11,22], which is in accordance with our experimental data. We can notice that the quantum yields of the derivatives 4 and 7 containing piperazine moiety were 5.87 and 4.67, respectively, in toluene, while in DMF the 9
Journal Pre-proof values of the quantum yield were 5.59 and 0.01, respectively. The fluorescence quantum yields of naphthalimide derivatives respect practically the same characteristics found to the naphthalic anhydride derivatives. Representative
time-resolved
decay
profiles
of
naphthalic
anhydride
and
naphthalimide derivatives are presented in Fig. 6 and the relevant results are collected in Table 3. Also, a strong solvent influence on the photophysical properties of compounds 2-4 and 5-7 was observed. For the naphthalimide derivatives, a monoexponential decay of the fluorescence lifetime was observed in non-polar solvents, while in polar solvents a biexponential decay was found out. For the naphthalic anhydride derivatives, the decay
of
profiles were adjusted to a biexponential model, excepting DMF where three fluorescence lifetimes were found out. The values of fluorescence lifetime decrease significantly passing
ro
from a nonpolar solvent to a polar one. In all cases, for the biexponential decay, it is clear that
-p
the lifetime τ1 is lower than τ2 for a particular solvent. The emission lifetime in non-polar solvents was around 9 ns for compounds 2-4 and 4.5-7.0 ns for compounds 5-7. The emission
re
decay in polar solvents supposes a biexponential fitting of the experimental data associated with two lifetimes τ1 and τ2. For both derivative series τ1 is lower than τ2 and the contributions
na
3.3. Solvatochromic behavior
lP
of the two lifetime components are much higher for τ1 than for τ2 (Table 3).
The solvent effect on the absorption and emission bands of some naphthalimide and
ur
naphthal anhydride derivatives was analyzed using the Catalan solvatochromic model [35,36] and a model based on the following solvatochromic parameters: polarity function f(ε) = ε +
Jo
1/ε + 2, electronic polarizability f(n) = (n2 – 1)/ (n 2 + 2), H-bonding donor ability (α) and Hbonding acceptor ability (β) [37,38], according to the relations: υ = υ0 + asaSA + bSBSB + cSPSP + dSaPSdP
(1)
and υ = υ0 + C1f(ε) + C2f(n) + C3β + C4α
(2)
where υ0 denotes the extrapolated value of wavenumber in gas state, SA is the solvent acidity, SB represents the solvent basicity, SP is the solvent polarizability, SdP denotes the solvent dipolarity, aSP, bSP, cSP, dSP and C1, C2, C3, C4 are coefficients which are characteristic for a given compound. For a certain solvent υ and υ0 represent the studied spectral property (υabs, υem, Δυ) in the presence or in the absence of the solvent. The values of the solvatochromic parameters [35,36,39-42] are given in Table 4. The regression coefficients indicate the dependence of y on the solvent parameters. The multiparametric regression analysis for the 10
Journal Pre-proof absorption and emission band maxima and Stokes shifts was performed using equations (1) and (2) to explain the solvato(fluoro)chromism of the these naphthalimide derivatives. The resulting values for the regression coefficients and the correlation coefficient (R2) for absorption and emission bands and Stokes shift are given in Table 5. The two types of multilinear regressions according to equations (1) and (2) give practically similar trends with high R2 values, suggesting a significant contribution of the non-specific interactions on the solvatochromic shifts. Plots corresponding to the calculated data according to equation (1) as a function of the experimental data are depicted in Fig. 7. It can be noticed from Table 5 that the
of
nonspecific interactions are the most important in the dependence of υ a and υem on Catalan parameters. The multilinear regression using the Catalan parameters indicates that the
ro
absorption maxima are mainly determined by the polarizability coefficient, however, the
-p
solvent dipolarity cannot be neglected for derivatives 2 and 3, and the basicity becomes a major contributor for derivatives 5 and 6, taking into account the values of the corresponding
re
coefficients. The dependence of Stokes shifts (Δυ) on the Catalan parameters indicated that the solvent polarizability and basicity had also a high influence on the Δυ for all derivatives
lP
being less sensitive to solvent dipolarity. As given in Table 5 the solvent polarizability contributions are of three magnitude orders higher relating to the basicity contribution. For the
na
fluorescence spectra the non-specific contributions represented by the polarizability and dipolarity coefficients give the greatest contribution to the spectral shifts. The negative sign of
ur
regression coefficients cSP and aSP is consistent with the bathochromic shift of the emission polar one.
Jo
maxima and the change in fluorescence quantum yield values from a nonpolar solvent to a The estimated coefficients using the {f(n), f(ε), β, α} multilinear regression analysis are listed in Table 5. In this case the changes in the absorption and fluorescence spectra of compounds 2,3 and 4,5 following the equation (2), the coefficients of polarizability (C2) and dielectric function (C2) are much higher than those of basicity and acidity suggesting that these compounds are more sensitive to the polarizability and induction interactions (f(ε)). The |C3| values are higher than |C4| excepting derivatives 4,5 for emission spectra. The {f(n), f(ε), β, α} multilinear regression fit applied to Δυ evolution showed again that the spectral shifts are dependent mainly on the polarizability (f(n) function) and solvent basicity because the absolute values of coefficient C2 is bigger than C3 coefficient and we must admit that the Stokes shifts are less sensitive to orientation-induction interactions and solvent acidity. A
11
Journal Pre-proof good agreement between the experimental data and wavenumbers determined according equations (1) and (2) was found in the selected solvents (Fig. 7 and 8). Due to their excellent emission properties some naphthalimide derivatives have been tested as chemosensors for different metal ions or neutral molecules [43,44]. For this purpose the emission characteristics of naphthalic anhydride and naphthalimide derivatives were investigated to detect picric acid. Firstly, fluorimetric titration was performed with compound 2 in presence of different concentrations of picric acid (c0 = 1.003x10-4 mol/L) in DMF. When the picric acid solution was gradually added into the solution of derivative 2, the fluorescence intensity decreases without the change of the position and the spectral profile, as shown in
of
Fig. 9. The quenching efficiency can be estimated using the relation (I0-I)/I0 where I0 and I are the fluorescence intensities before and after addition of picric acid as quencher. The
ro
fluorescence quenching efficiency reaches around 42 % for derivatives 2 and 3, respectively
-p
and 48 % for 5 and 6. A higher quenching efficiency was obtained for derivative 1 (33 %). The fluorescence quenching due to picric acid can be described by the Stern-Volmer (SV)
re
equation:
I0/I = 1 = KSV[C]
(3)
lP
where I0 and I are the fluorescence intensity in the absence and in the presence of quencher, [C] is the molar concentration of quencher and KSV represents the quenching constant. A good
na
linear relationship between I0/I ratio and quencher concentration was observed on the whole range of quencher concentration (Fig. 10). The Stern-Volmer constant calculated according to
ur
relation (3) was found to be 3.9x104 mol-1. The linearity of the Stern-Volmer plot indicated that the quenching can follow a static mechanism. The decrease of the emission lifetimes and
4. Conclusions
Jo
the quantum fluorescence yield can be associated with the increase of solvent polarity.
Synthesis procedures and photophysical properties for derivatives of 6-amino-1,8naphthalic anhydride and 2-hydroxy-6-amino-1,8-naphthalimide have been described. The results demonstrated that both 1,8-naphthalic anhydride and 1,8-naphthalimide derived group of compounds have fluorescence properties and convenient Stokes shift values. Multilinear regression analysis of these derivatives was carried out using Catalan solvatochromic parameters indicating that the solvent polarizability was a major factor responsible for the red shift of absorption and emission spectra. Also, the solvatochromic analysis based on {f(n), f(ε), β, α} parameters concluded that the polarity function and polarizability are the main contributors to the red shifted absorption and emission spectra from non-polar to polar 12
Journal Pre-proof solvents. Taking into account the discernible fluorescent characteristics of the naphthalic anhydride derivatives, their sensing properties towards picric acid were tested. Due to the interesting photophysical properties proved by some of these molecules, the design, synthesis and spectroscopic investigations of similar fluorescent compounds may be taken into consideration in bio-imaging investigations and as core of new fluorescent bioactive compounds.
Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Ministry of Research and Innovation, CNCS -
of
UEFISCDI, project ERANET-INCOMERA-2018-BENDIS within the PNCDI III and EU H2020 programs, Contract 7/2018. Access to research infrastructure developed in the “Petru
ro
Poni” Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry through the European Social Fund for Regional
-p
Development, Competitiveness Operational Programme Axis 1, Project InoMatPol (ID
re
P_36_570, Contract 142/10.10.2016, cod MySMIS: 107464) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
L.D. Lavis, R.T. Raines, Bright ideas for chemical biology, ACS Chem Biol. 3 (2008)
lP
[1]
142-155.
L.D. Lavis, R.T. Raines, Bright building for chemical biology, ACS Chem Biol. 9 (2014) 855-866.
G. Weber, F.J. Farris, Synthesis and spectral properties of a hydrophobic fluorescent
ur
[3]
na
[2]
3078. [4]
Jo
probe: 6-propionyl-2-(dimethylamino)naphthalene, Biochemistry 18 (1979) 3075-
A.B.J. Parusel, W. Nowak, S. Grimme, G. Köhler, Comparative theoretical study on charge-transfer fluorescence probes: 6-Propanoyl-2-(N,N-dimethylamino)naphthalene and derivatives, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 7149-7156.
[5]
A.S.I. Amer, A.M.M. Alazaly, A.A. Abdel-Shafi, Solvatochromism of 1-naphthol-4sulfonate photoacid and its encapsulation in cyclodextrin deivatives, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 369 (2019) 202-211.
[6]
Y.H. Li, L.M. Chan, L. Tyer, R.T. Moody, C.M. Himel, D.M. Hercules, Solvent effects on the fluorescence of 1-(dimethylamino)-5-naphthalenesulfonic acid and related compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97 (1975) 3118-3126.
[7]
A.T. Peters, M.J. Bide, Amino derivatives of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride and derived dyes for synthetic-polymer fibres, Dyes Pigm. 6 (1985) 349-375. 13
Journal Pre-proof [8]
M.S. Alexiou, V.S. Tychopoulos, S. Ghorbanian, J.H.P. Tyman, R.G. Brown, P.I. Brittain, The UV-Visible absorption and fluorescence of some substituted 1,8naphthalimides and naphthalic anhydrides, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1990, 837.
[9]
G.R. Bardajee, A.Y. Li, J.C. Haley, M.A. Winnik, The synthesis and spectroscopic properties of novel, functional fluorescent naphthalimide dyes. Dyes Pigm. 79 (2008) 24-32.
[10]
H. Shaki, K. Gharanjig, S. Rouhani, A. Khosravi, Synthesis and photophysical properties of some novel fluorescent dyes based on naphthalimide derivatives. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chemistry 216 (2010) 44-50. I. Grabchev, I. Moneva, V. Bojinov, S. Guittonneau, Synthesis and properties of
of
[11]
fluorescent 1,8-naphthalimide dyes for application in liquid crystal displays, J. Mat.
V.B. Bojinov, I.A. Grabchev, New method for synthesis of 4-allyloxy-1,8-
-p
[12]
ro
Chem. 10 (2000) 1292-1296.
naphthalimide derivatives for use as fluorescent brighteners, Dyes Pigm. 51 (2001)
[13]
re
57-61.
X. Qian, Z. Zhu, K. Chen, The synthesis, application and prediction of stokes shift in
[14]
lP
fluorescent dyes derived from 1,8-naphthalic anhydride, Dyes Pigm. 11 (1989) 13-20. T. Gunnlaugsson, C.P. McCoy, R.J. Morrow, C. Phelan, F. Stomeo, Towards the
na
development of controllable and reversible „on-off‟ luminescence switching in softmatter; synthesis and spectroscopic investigation of 1,8-naphthalimide-based PET
ur
(photoinduced electron transfer) chemosensors for pH in water-permeable hydrogels, ARKIVOC (2003) 216-228.
K.A. Mitchell, R.G. Brown, D. Yuan, S.C. Chang, R.E. Utecht, D.E.A. Lewis,
Jo
[15]
fluorescent sensor for Cu2+ at the sub-ppm level, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chemistry 115 (1998) 157-161. [16]
Y. Xiao, X. Qian, Novel highly efficient fluoroionophores with a peri-effect and strong electron-donating receptors: TICT-promoted PET and signaling response to transition metal cations with low background emission. Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 2087-2091.
[17]
X. Qian, Y. Xiao, Y. Xu, X. Guo, J. Qian, W. Zhu, „„Alive‟‟ dyes as fluorescent sensors: fluorophore, mechanism, receptor and images in living cells. Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 6418-6436.
[18]
S.C. Chang, B.J. Archer, R.E. Utecht, D.E. Lewis, M.M. Judy, J.L. Matthews, 4Alkylamino-3-bromo-N-alkyl-1,8-naphthalimides: new photochemically activatable antiviral compounds, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 3 (1993) 555-556. 14
Journal Pre-proof [19]
L. Ingrassia, F. Lefranc, R. Kiss, T. Mijatovic, Naphthalimides and azonafides as promising anti-cancer agents, Curr. Med. Chem. 16 (2009) 1192-1213.
[20]
S. Banerjee, E.B. Veale, C.M. Phelan, S.A. Murphy, G.M. Tocci, L.J. Gillespie, D.O. Frimannsson, J.M. Kelly, T. Gunnlaugsson, Recent advances in the development of 1,8-naphthalimide based DNA targeting binders, anticancer and fluorescent cellular imaging agents, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 1601-1618.
[21]
G. Saito, D. Velluto, M. Resmini, Synthesis of 1,8-naphthalimide-based probes with fluorescent switch triggered by flufenamic acid, R. Soc. opensci. 5 (2018) 172137.
[22]
L. Bekere, D. D. Gachet, V. Lokshin, W. Marine, V. Khodorkovsky, Synthesis and
of
spectroscopic properties of 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide derivatives involving the carboxylic group: a new molecular probe for ZnO nanoparticles with unusual
Z.F. Tao, X. Qian, J. Tang, Synthesis of furonaphthalimides as DNA intercalators, Dyes Pigm. 30 (1996) 247-252.
F. Oancea, E. Georgescu, R. Matusova, F. Georgescu, A. Nicolescu, I. Raut, M.L.
re
[24]
-p
[23]
ro
fluorescence features, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 9 (2013) 1311-1318.
Jecu, M.C. Vladulescu, L. Vladulescu, C. Deleanu, New strigolactone mimics as
[25]
lP
exogenous signals for rhizosphere organisms, Molecules 22 (2017) 961-975. E. Georgescu, A. Nicolescu, F. Georgescu, F. Teodorescu, S. Shova, A.T. Marinoiu, F.
na
Dumitrascu, C. Deleanu, Fine tuning the outcome of 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
2520. [26]
ur
reactions of benzimidazoliumylides to activated alkynes, Tetrahedron 72 (2016) 2507-
A. Nicolescu, C. Deleanu, E. Georgescu, F. Georgescu, A.-M. Iurascu, S. Shova, P.
Jo
Filip, Unexpected formation of pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline derivatives during the multicomponent synthesis of pyrrolo[1,2-a]benzimidazoles, Tetrahedron Lett., 54 (2013) 1486-1488. [27]
E. Georgescu, A. Nicolescu, F. Georgescu, F. Teodorescu, D. Marinescu, A.-M. Macsim, C. Deleanu, New highlights of the syntheses of pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxalin-4ones, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 10 (2014) 2377-2387.
[28]
E. Georgescu, A. Nicolescu, F. Georgescu, S. Shova, F. Teodorescu, A.-M. Macsim, C. Deleanu, Novel one-pot, multicomponents synthetic strategy towards pyrrolo[1,2a]benzimidazole and pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline derivatives, Synthesis 47 (2015) 16431655.
[29]
P. F. Vlad, A. Ciocarlan, C. Edu, A. Aricu, A. Biriiac, M. Coltsa, M. D‟Ambrosio, C. Deleanu, A. Nicolescu, S. Shova, N. Vornicu, A. de Groot, Regio- and stereoselective 15
Journal Pre-proof synthesis of (+)-6-ketoeuryfuran, (+)-6-ketowinterin and (-)-7-ketoeuryfuran from accessible labdane diterpenoids (+)-larixol and (-)-sclareol, Tetrahedron, 69 (2013) 918-926. [30]
A. Oancea, E. Georgescu, F. Georgescu, A. Nicolescu, E.I. Oprita, C. Tudora, L. Vladulescu, M.C. Vladulescu, F. Oancea, C. Deleanu, Isoxazole derivatives as new nitric oxide elicitors in plants, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 13 (2017) 659-664.
[31]
E. Georgescu, A. Oancea, F. Georgescu, A. Nicolescu E.I. Oprita, L. Vladulescu, M.C. Vladulescu, F. Oancea, S. Shova, C. Deleanu, Schiff bases containing a furoxan moiety as potential nitric oxide donors in plant tissues, Plos One, 13 (2018) e0198121.
[32]
of
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198121.
R.K. Amegadzie, M.E. Carey, J.M. Domagala, L. Huang, R.G. Micetih, J.P. Sanchez,
E. Martin, R. Weigand, A. Pardo, Solvent dependence of the inhibition of
-p
[33]
ro
R. Singh, M.A. Stier, A.Vaisburg, Isoquinolones. US Pat. 6177423 B1, Jan. 23, 2001.
intramolecular charge-transfer in N-substituted 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives as dye
[34]
re
lasers, J. Luminesc. 68 (1996) 157-164.
S.S. Mati, S. Chall, S. Rakshit, S.C. Bhatacharya, Spectroscopic and quantum
lP
mechanical approach of solvatochromic immobilization: Modulation of electronic structure and excited state properties of 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives, J. Fluoresc. 25
[35]
na
(2015) 341-353.
J. Catalan, H. Hopf, Empirical treatment of inductive and dispersive components of
4694-4702.
J. Catalan, Toward a generalized treatment of the solvent effect based on four
Jo
[36]
ur
solute-solvent interaction: the polarizability solvent scale, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2004)
empirical scales. Dipolarity (SdP, a new scale), polarizability (SP), acidity (SA) and basicity (SB) of the medium, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009) 5951-5960. [37]
A. Airinei, E. Rusu. D. Dorohoi, Solvent influence on the electronic spectra of some azoaromatic compounds, Spectrosc. Lett. 34 (2001) 65-74.
[38]
E. Rusu, D. Dorohoi, A. Airinei, Solvatochromic effects in the absorption spectra of some azobenzene compounds, J. Mol. Struct. 887 (2008) 216-219.
[39]
L. R. Lide, Ed., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 76th ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995.
[40]
M.J. Kamlet, J.L.M. Abboud, M.H. Abraham, R.W. Taft, Linear solvation energy relationships. 23. A comprehensive collection of the solvatochromic parameters pi*,
16
Journal Pre-proof alpha and beta, and some methods for simplifying the generalized solvatochromic equation, J. Org. Chem. 48 (1983) 2877-2887. [41]
Y. Marcus, The properties of organic liquids that are relevant to their use as solvating solvents, Chem. Soc. Rev. 22 (1993) 409-416.
[42]
C. Reichardt, Solvents and Solvent Effect in Organic Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
[43]
S. Hladysh, A. Murmilirek, J. Vohlidel, J. Zednik, Attachement of a 1,8-naphthalimide moiety to a conjugated polythiophene efficiently improves the sensing ability of naphthalimide-based materials, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 220 (2019) 1800436. M. Bahta, N. Ahmed, A novel 1,8-naphthalimide as highly selective naked-eye and
of
[44]
ratiometric fluorescent sensor for detection of Hg2+ ions, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:
-p
ro
Chem. 373 (2019) 154-161.
Captions
re
Scheme 1. The synthetic procedures towards naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derivatives. Fig. 1. Absorption UV-VIS spectra of the naphthalic anhydride derivatives in DMF.
lP
Fig. 2. Absorption UV-VIS spectra of the naphthalimide derivatives in DMF. Fig. 3. Emission spectra of the compounds 1-4.
na
Fig. 4. Emission spectra of the compounds 5-7.
Fig. 5. Fluorescence spectra of derivative 2 in selected solvents.
derivatives.
ur
Fig. 6. Time-resolved decay profile of the naphthalic anhydride and naphthalimide
Jo
Fig. 7. Correlation graphs between the frequencies obtained using Catalan parameters and experimentally frequencies of derivative 3: a) absorption; b) emission; c) Stokes shift. Fig. 8. Linear relationship between the experimental and calculated frequencies using relation (2) for derivative 6: a) absorption; b) emission; c) Stokes shift. Fig. 9. Fluorescence spectra changes of derivative 2 in DMF upon addition of picric acid. Fig. 10. Stern-Volmer plot for quenching of 2 by picric acid. Table 1. Absorption and fluorescence wavenumbers, Stokes shifts (cm-1) and fluorescence quantum yields (%) of some naphthalic anhydride derivatives. Table 2. Absorption, fluorescence wavenumbers, Stokes shifts (cm-1) and fluorescence quantum yields (%) of some naphthalimide derivatives. Table 3. Excited state lifetimes of some naphthalic anhydride and naphthalimide derivatives. Table 4. Some empirical solvatochromic parameters of the solvents. 17
Journal Pre-proof Table 5. Susceptibility constants using the multiple regression analysis of equations (1) and
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
(2).
18
Journal Pre-proof Table 1. Absorption and fluorescence wavenumbers, Stokes shifts (cm-1) and fluorescence quantum yields (%) of some naphthalic anhydride derivatives. Compound
1
2
No.
Solvent
υa
υem
Δυ
Φ
υa
υem
Δυ
Φ
υa
1
Dioxane
29586
26205
3381
3.88
24938
19485
5453
56.91
25000
1
2
Toluene
29375
24563
4762
4.52
24814
20198
4606
52.99
24814
2
Ethyl acetate 29586
26288
3298
5.12
24712
19091
5661
29.08
24691
1
3
DCM
29325
25880
3415
7.17
23866
19090
4786
65.23
23981
1
5
DCE
29325
25900
3405
<0.01
23585
19015
4570
30.24
23868
1
6
Methanol
29498 355549
3999
6.96
24155
18505
5650
<0.01
24213
1
7
Acetonitrile
29598
25859
3639
5.92
24086
18336
5758
5.83
24155
1
8
DMF
29412
26219
3193
0.95
24096
18386
5710
16.61
24096
1
9
DMSO
29325
26246
3078
0.27
23866
18501
5710
<0.01
23923
1
-p
ro
of
4
re
DCM - dichloromethane; DCE - dichloroethane; DMF - dimethylformamide; DMSO -
Jo
ur
na
lP
dimethyl sulfoxide.
19
Journal Pre-proof Table 2. Absorption, fluorescence wavenumbers, Stokes shifts (cm-1) and fluorescence quantum yields (%) of some naphthalimide derivatives.
Compound
6
Solvent
υa
υem
Δυ
Φ
υa
υem
Δυ
Φ
1
Dioxane
24631
19316
5315
29.21
24631
19284
5337
65.28
2
Toluene
24450
19612
4838
21.61
24213
19627
4586
45.97
3
Ethyl acetate
24570
18925
5644
7.54
24570
18939
5631
11.19
4
DCM
23697
18864
4833
41.28
23474
18854
4620
74.71
5
DCE
23256
18800
4456
17.13
23364
18776
4588
36.09
6
Methanol
21753
18779
4974
0.35
23809
18681
5128
2.65
7
Acetonitrile
24096
18625
5471
<0.01
23923
18474
5449
4.39
8
DMF
24155
18779
5376
0.20
24213
18734
5479
2.21
9
DMSO
23866
18776
5090
23923
18678
5245
<0.01
ro
of
No
-p
5
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
0.14
20
Journal Pre-proof Table 3. Excited state lifetimes of some naphthalic anhydride and naphthalimide derivatives.
4 8 5
6
7
1.107 0.722
79.94 10.99
94.48 84.47
7.539 5.664
5.52 15.53
92.50 80.69
5.876 6.847
7.50 19.31
11.596 8.953 2.195
46.92 48.67 27.82
50.80 64.08
1.943 7.665
6.31 35.92
81.89 77.88
6.958 7.670
18.11 22.12
46.36
4.571
53.64
53.08 51.33 41.89
ur
3
Jo
2
20.06 84.12
a3
10.00
4.89
10.996
30.29
7.891
42.89
of
0.076 0.027 9.124 9.746 8.083 0.370 0.167 8.899 9.980 8.601 0.446 0.179 1.338 1.508 1.110 0.147 4.979 7.255 5.505 0.248 0.175 4.516 6.854 4.717 0.237 0.172 1.284 0.261
9.84 89.34 89.33
τ3 (ns)
ro
Acetonitrile DMF Toluene DCM DCE Acetonitrile DMF Toluene DCM DCE Acetonitrile DMF Toluene DMF Toluene DMF Toluene DCM DCE Acetonitrile DMF Toluene DCM DCE Acetonitrile DMF Toluene DMF
90.16 10.66 10.67
a2
-p
Dioxane DCM DCE
τ2 (ns) 6.801 1.648 1.442
a1
re
1
τ1 (ns) 1.044 0.446 0.330
lP
Solvent
na
Sample
21
Journal Pre-proof
n
ε
β
α
SA
SB
SP
SdP
Dioxane
1.4224
2.22
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.444
0.737
0.312
Toluene
1.4969
2.38
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.128
0.782
0.284
Ethyl acetate
1.3723
6.08
0.45
0.10
0.00
0.542
0.656
0.603
DCM
1.4242
9.08
0.00
0.3
0.04
0.178
0.761
0.769
DCE
1.4448
10.42
0.0
0.0
0.03
0.126
0.771
0.712
Methanol
1.3288
22.10 0.62
0.93
0.605
0.545
0.608
0.904
Acetonitrile
1.3442
37.50 0.31
0.19
0.044
0.286
0.645
0.974
DMF
1.4305
38.75 0.69
0.10
0.031
0.613
0.759
0.977
DMSO
1.4770
47.24 0.76
0.00
0.830
0.830
1.000
of
Solvent
ro
Table 4. Some empirical solvatochromic parameters of the solvents.
0.012
-p
DCM - dichloromethane; DCE - dichloroethane; DMF - dimethylformamide; DMSO -
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
dimethyl sulfoxide
22
Journal Pre-proof Table 5. Susceptibility constants using the multiple regression analysis of equations (1) and
Eq (2) υa
dSaP
R2
2
26887
-529
1129
-2519
-1652
0.90
3
26602
-366
803
-2015
-1503
0.95
5
26178
-1145
887
-2339
-1004
0.92
6
15971
-1079
1744
-2155
-1148
0.93
2
19244
360
-563
1790
-1925
0.95
3
2028
49
-683
682
-1981
-.97
5
18815
316
76
1203
-1107
0.90
6
18770
287
84
1812
-1248
0.93
2
7643
-888
1692
-4310
-274
0.92
3
6394
415
1485
-2677
458
0.91
5
7677
-1551
1329
-3924
-69
0.90
6
7202
-1367
1660
-3681
100
0.96
Sample
I0
C1
C2
C3
C4
R2
2
27143
-2079
-6745
824
-216
0.92
3
26884
-1876
-5714
581
-162
0.97
5
26826
-422
-10214
7
192
0.92
6
26706
-7709
1182
-691
0.96
18870
-1901
6103
-388
372
0.94
Δυ
ro
of
CSP
-1526
3
19784
-2039
3182
-517
221
0.95
5
18737
-1162
3744
154
263
0.94
6
18690
-1281
4134
124
254
0.95
2
8274
-178
-12818
1212
-588
0.96
3
7087
164
-8896
1099
-383
0.96
5
8086
-502
-11631
10
218
0.92
6
8016
-245
-11643
1058
-944
0.98
2
Jo
υem
bSB
-p
Δυ
aSA
re
υem
Y0
na
υa
Sample
ur
Eq. (1)
lP
(2).
23
Journal Pre-proof
CRediT author statement Alina Nicolescu: Methodology, Investigation; Anton Airinei: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing; Emilian Georgescu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing; Florentina Georgescu: Conceptualization, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review &
of
Editing;
ro
Radu Tigoianu: Investigation;
-p
Florin Oancea: Methodology, Resources, Funding acquisition; Calin Deleanu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Resources, Writing - Review
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
& Editing, Funding acquisition.
24
Journal Pre-proof
Declaration of interests X The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper (“Synthesis, photophysical properties and solvatochromic analysis of some naphthalene-1,8dicarboxylic acid derivatives”).
of
☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
Alina Nicolescu, Anton Airinei, Emilian Georgescu, Florentina Georgescu, Radu Tigoianu, Florin Oancea, Calin Deleanu
25
Journal Pre-proof
Multinuclear NMR chemical shift assignments
Application of Catalan and Laurence solvatochromic models
Substituent impact on the photophysical properties of naphthalene-1,8-dicarboxylic acid derivatives
The presence of piperidine moiety leads to high fluorescence in solution
Jo
ur
na
lP
re
-p
ro
of
Highlights Novel 1,8-naphthalic anhydride and 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives have been synthesized
26
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10