Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, anti-urease activities of a novel bisphosphoramidate, a combined experimental and computational study

Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, anti-urease activities of a novel bisphosphoramidate, a combined experimental and computational study

Accepted Manuscript Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, anti-urease activities of a novel bisphosphoramidate, a combined experimental and compu...

NAN Sizes 3 Downloads 80 Views

Accepted Manuscript Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, anti-urease activities of a novel bisphosphoramidate, a combined experimental and computational study Nasrin Fallah, Khodayar Gholivand, Mohammad Yousefi, Parviz Aberoomand Azar PII:

S0022-2860(18)30807-X

DOI:

10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.06.106

Reference:

MOLSTR 25393

To appear in:

Journal of Molecular Structure

Received Date: 11 March 2018 Revised Date:

27 May 2018

Accepted Date: 27 June 2018

Please cite this article as: N. Fallah, K. Gholivand, M. Yousefi, P. Aberoomand Azar, Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, anti-urease activities of a novel bisphosphoramidate, a combined experimental and computational study, Journal of Molecular Structure (2018), doi: 10.1016/ j.molstruc.2018.06.106. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, anti- urease activities of a novel bisphosphoramidate, a combined experimental and computational study

Nasrin Fallaha, Khodayar Gholivandb, *, Mohammad Yousefia,

a

RI PT

Parviz Aberoomand azara,

Department of Chemistry, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

b

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

SC

*e-mail: [email protected]

M AN U

Abstract

Methylenebis(N,N'-dibenzylphosphoramidate) (MBDPA) is synthesized by 1:8 mole ratio reaction of Methylenebis(phosphonic dichloride) and benzylamine. MBDPA characterized by FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, 31

PNMR spectroscopy. Also, The IC50 value for MBDPA is 5.23 nM that show very strong urease inhibitory

activity. The geometry optimization is performed using the B3LYP and PBE1PBE density functional methods

TE D

with two basis sets; 6-311 G (d, p) and 6-311+G(d,p). 1H, 13C and 31PNMR chemical shifts have been calculated by using the gauge independent atomic orbital (GIAO) method. The infrared spectra of MBDPA are calculated and compared with the experimentally observed ones. The assignments are determined on the basis of the

EP

potential energy distribution of the all vibrational modes. Results of this study showed that there is a good correlation between the experimental data and computational results. The electronic structure is studied by

AC C

analyzing the frontier molecular orbitals and molecular electrostatic potential for the prediction of stability and activity of the MBDPA.

Keywords: bisphosphoramidate; urease inhibitor; B3LYP; PBE1PBE; chemical shift; electronic structure.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction Phosphorus is a very important element in organic, bioorganic and inorganic chemistry and phosphoramidates are the compounds contain P=O and P-N functional groups. Chemistry of mono and bisphosphoramidates and their derivatives have been a subject of

RI PT

growing interest for the last two decades [1]. Thus, in this work, we are synthesis Methylenebis(N,N'-dibenzylphosphoramidate) (MBDPA) and characterized by FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, 31P NMR spectroscopy. Also, we calculated IR and NMR spectra and NBO

SC

analysis with density functional theory (DFT). Ft-IR and NMR spectra could be fairly good reproduced by theoretical method applied here. Additionally, charge distributions and NBO

M AN U

analysis of MBDPA predicts that the oxygen atoms of the title compound are the most negative site to an electrophilic attacked and a good candida for reacting with urease enzyme, because urease (jack bean urease) is a nickel-containing metalloenzyme which two nickel ions within its active site that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to form ammonia and

TE D

carbamate [2,3]. Therefore, the measurement of urease inhibitory activity was carried out and the title compound shows strong urease inhibitory activity.

EP

2. Experimental details

2.1. General considerations

AC C

Infrared spectra were recorded in KBr discs in the region 4000–400 cm−1 on a

Thermo Nicolet NEXUS 870 FT-IR spectrometer.1H,

13

C and

recorded on a Bruker Avance DRX 500 spectrometer. 1H and determined relative to internal TMS, and

31

31

13

P NMR spectra were

C chemical shifts were

P chemical shifts relative to 85% H3PO4 as an

external standard. Melting points were obtained with an electrothermal instrument. 2.2. Synthesis of [(PhCH2NH)2P(O)CH2P(O)(PhCH2NH)2]

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Methylenebis(phosphonic dichloride) was very moisture sensitive, therefore reaction was performed in the absence of water, under argon gas and dry solvent. All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck companies were used as received.

RI PT

A solution of benzylamine (0.8572 g, 8 mmol) in CH2Cl2 was added at 273 °K to a solution of Methylenebis(phosphonic dichloride) (0.250g, 1 mmol) in CH2Cl2. After 4 h stirring the solvent was removed in vacuum and the resulting white powder was washed with

SC

distilled water. The synthesis pathway of the compound is represented below.

Powder sampel: Yield 53%, m.p. 105–108 °C. 1H NMR (500.13 MHz, DMSO-d6, 298

6.828-8.128 (m, 20H, CHPh),

13

M AN U

K, TMS): 1.22-1.27 (d, 4H, NHiso), δ= 2.107-2.203 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.928-4.035 (m, 8H, CH2), C NMR (125.757MHz, DMSO-d6, 298 K, TMS): δ= 88.524

(1C, CH2), 92.615 (4C, CH2), 126.664 (4C, C para), 127.543 (8C, C meta), 128.803 (8C, C ortho), 92.615 (4C, CH2), 141.09 (4C,ipso-C6H5), ppm. 31P NMR (202.45 MHz, DMSO-d6,

TE D

298 °K, H3PO4 external): δ= 22.84 (multiplet) ppm.

IR (KBr, cm−1): 3300 (s, N–H), 3190 (br), 3036 (m), 2914 (m), 1639 (m), 1449 (s),

< Scheme 1>

AC C

EP

1167 (vs, P=O), 1109 (m), 1066 (m), 873 (m), 817 (m),734 (m), 691(m), 590 (m).

2.3. Urease inhibitory activity Urease (urea amidohydrolase; E.C.3.5.1.5) is a metalloenzyme containing two nickel atoms which catalyze the hydrolysis of urea so as to form ammonia and carbamate. The carbamate produced, automatically decomposes to produce a second molecule of ammonia and carbon dioxide. High concentrations of ammonia which follow from these reactions as well as the accompanying pH elevation, have important negative implications for both human and animal health, and for agriculture [4]. The use of inhibitors for controlling the activity of 3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT urease could counteract these negative effects. In the past few years, a few phosphinicamide were studied for their urease inhibitory activity, and have recently had a breakthrough [5]. We previously reported the urease inhibitory activities of some phosphinicamide and Phosphorhydrazide [3]. For urease inhibitory activity, all chemicals used were of analytical

RI PT

grade from Merck Co. Sodium nitroprusside and urease (EC 3.5.1.5) from Jack beans were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ultra-pure water was used throughout the experiments.

SC

Potassium phosphate buffer (100 mM), pH=7.4, was prepared in distilled water.

3. Computational details

M AN U

In the present work, quantum chemical calculations were carried out at DFT levels using the Gaussian 09 suites of programs [6]. The structure of MBDPA was optimized using the B3LYP and PBE1PBE density functional employing, 6-311G(d,p) and 6-311+G(d,p) basis sets in the gas phase. All calculations were performed assuming C1 point group

TE D

symmetry for title compound. All computed structures were confirmed as energy by calculating the vibrational frequencies using second derivative analytic methods and confirming the absence of imaginary frequencies. The isotropic shielding (σiso) values were

AC C

[7].

EP

calculated based on the gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) technique in the gas phase

Calculated shielding values for each atom in molecule were shifted relatively from a

frequency of standard compounds: tetramethylsilane (TMS) for hydrogen and carbon atoms and orthophosphoric acid (H3PO4) for phosphorus atom. In order to compare theoretical values with experimental results, we also computed the absolute shielding constants for TMS and H3PO4 using the same set of quantum chemical calculations. The 1H, and 13C chemical shifts (δ) were then calculated by subtracting the calculated isotopic value of the shielding tensor σiso,cal from that of TMS: δ= σiso, TMS - σiso,cal. and

4

31

P

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT chemical shifts (δ) were calculated by: δ= σiso, H3PO4 - σiso,cal. Also, 1H, 13C and 31P chemical shifts of structure were simulated using the Gauss View software [8]. The NBO [9] analyses have been performed to compare the electronic features of the gas-phase structures of the compound at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)and PBE1PBE/6-

RI PT

311+G(d,p) level. All band assignments were performed by the potential energy distribution calculated by PBE1PBE and B3LYP using the VEDA 4 program[10]. The statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel version 2013.

4. Results and Discussion 4.1. Structural study

M AN U



SC

was carried out using MATLAB version R2010a.[11] and all charts were plotted using the

The optimized structure and atom numbering of MBDPA are shown in Figure 1. The

TE D

optimized structure was compared with the previously published similar molecules. The selected most relevant calculated bond lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles at different levels of theory are listed in Tables 1-3. These data reveal that the estimated bond lengths at

EP

different DFT levels are almost independent of the method and basis set used. The following

AC C

results are referred to the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) levels of theory.



The computed bond length of phosphoryl group are 1.4947– 1.4996 Å at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)level and 1.4915–1.4933 Å at the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) level. The experimental P=O bond lengths in mono and bisphosphoramidate are reported 1.476– 1.469 Å in the published literature [12,13]. The computed bond length of P-N are 1.6748, 1.6812,

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1.6708, 1.6879 Å at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)level and 1.6653, 1.6735, 1.6646, 1.6782 Å at the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) level and the experimental value reported in the published literature 1.6571, 1.6184, 1.6158, 1.676(2) [10-13]. The B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) calculations predict the P-C bond lengths are 1.8476-1.8387 Å, and 1.8306- 1.8309 Å at the PBE1PBE/6-

RI PT

311+G(d,p) and the experimental value reported in the published 1.7990(14)- 1.8048(15) Å, [14] respectively. Figure 2 shows the correlations between the experimental and calculated bond lengths. As is evident, a good linear correlation (correlation coefficient= 0.9878) was



M AN U



SC

observed between the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) results and experimental data.



The computed bond angles for O2-P1-N51 (113.2072°), O2-P1-N53 (118.7465°), O3-

TE D

P4-N49 (121.0186°), O3-P4-N55 (110.5819°), at the B3LYP level, which are confirmed by the experimental data of 114.88 (9)°, 113.17 (8)°, [13]. (Table 2). The calculated dihedral angles at B3LYP level for O2-P1-N51-C66 (28.5837°), O2-P1-N53-C63 (-50.4682°), O3-P4-

EP

N49-C60 (36.3634°), O3-P4-N55-C57 (-28.8961°), respectively, which are in experimental

AC C

values of -47.97(19) –178.63(12) [13]. It is evident from Tables 1-3, the optimized bond lengths and bond angles were

slightly dissimilar than the literature values because the molecular states were different during the experimental and theoretical process. The isolated molecule is considered as in gas phase during theoretical calculation, while many packing molecules were treated as in the condensed phase during the experimental measurements. 4.2. Vibrational assignments

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The experimental and theoretical simulated FT-IR spectra of MBDPA are presented in Figure S1 and S2 of Supporting Information. The FT-IR vibrational pattern includes many stretching, bending and torsional vibrations that creates many signals. In this research, The



RI PT

computational methods were used for analysis of the interpretation of vibrational spectra.

The theoretical calculations shows MBDPA has the C1 point group symmetry. This

SC

compound consists of 71 atoms. The number of vibration normal modes of MBDPA are 207, 70 modes of vibrations are stretching, bending 69, torsion 63 and 5 vibrational modes are out-

M AN U

of-plane. The theoretical frequencies and infrared intensities of title compound calculated at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) levels are presented in Tables 4 and 5.

4.2.1. N–H vibrations

TE D



In phosphoramidates, N–H stretching vibration appears at 3200–3500 cm-1 [16]. The

EP

FT-IR bands for the N–H stretching vibrations are observed at 3301 cm-1. The theoretical

AC C

calculated N–H stretching vibration appears at 3556 cm-1 at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level which is in good agreement with the experimental data. The calculated N–H stretching vibrations appear at 3604 cm-1 by the PBE1PBE/6-311+ G (d, p). As evidenced by the Table 4, these modes number are 204-207. 4.2.1.C–H vibrations The C–H stretching vibration in alkanes and aromatic structures are in the regions of 2850–3000 cm-1 and 3000–3100 cm-1, respectively [17]. The title compound was contained 8 aliphatic and 20 aromatic C–H. bonds. There are 30 vibrational modes for C–H stretching

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Table 4). The FT-IR bands for the C–H stretching vibrations are observed at 3190 cm-1 and 3036 cm-1. The calculated C–H stretching vibration appears at 3185 and 3066 cm-1 at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p). The calculated C–H stretching vibrations appear at 3213 and 3083 cm1

by the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p).

RI PT

As seen from Tables 4, 5 there are many vibrational modes for H–C–C and H–C–H bending vibration. The calculated H–C–C bending vibration appears at 1647 to 1050 cm-1 and 1676 to 1061 cm-1 at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) level,

SC

respectively. The calculated H–C–H bending vibration appears at 1531 to 1429 cm-1 and 1539 to 1430 cm-1 at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p),

M AN U

respectively. Bending vibrations of H–C–P have occurred in 109, 110, 112 and 115 mode numbers (Table 5). 4.2.3. P=O vibrations

The absorption at 1100-1300 cm-1 is assigned to the P=O stretching absorption bands

TE D

[18]. In this structure, the P=O stretching vibration is seen at 1167 cm-1. But the calculated P=O stretching vibration appears at 122, 123, 128 and 130 mode numbers that in 122, 123 mode numbers infrared intensities higher than 128 and 130 mode numbers at the B3LYP/6-

EP

311+G(d,p) and the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p), respectively which are in good agreement with

AC C

the experimental data.(Tables 4, 5) 4.2.4.P–N vibrations

The P–N stretching absorption of phosphoramidates occurs in the region of 730-

930cm-1[19]. According to the Table 5 the calculated P–N stretching vibration appears at 744 to 897cm-1 using the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and at the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) level appears at 752 to 911 cm-1 that the most of them overlap with C–C stretching vibrations and C–C–C bending vibrations. Nevertheless, these bands are observed weak in the FT-IR. 4.2.5. Other vibrations

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT In the low wavenumber range (below 600 cm-1) the bending and torsion vibrations are expected to occur. As seen in Table 5 the maximum number of vibrational modes refer to C– C–C bending vibration and C–C–C–C torsion vibration, because the number of carbon atoms is higher than other atoms and any vibrational motion in the molecule results in the transfer of

RI PT

vibration to these bonds. According to the Table 5 there are many vibrational modes for C– C–C, P–C–N, O–P–N, C–N–P, and N–P–N bending vibration that often overlap with torsion vibration. However, in the FT-IR spectra, weak bands are observed. Although most of the

4.3. Chemical shift analysis The experimental 1H,

13

C, and

M AN U

shown a good way to analyze the structure of molecules.

SC

FT-IR spectroscopic devices cannot scan a range of fewer than 400 cm-1, But calculation was

31

P NMR spectra of MBDPA are presented in Figure

S3-S7.of Supporting Information. The experimental and theoretical chemical shifts of 1H nuclei in MBDPA are listed in Table 6. It is obtained that the 1H chemical shifts (with respect

TE D

to TMS) occur at 2.2767–9.7759 and 0.9032–9.1079 ppm at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) levels, respectively, whereas the experimental shifts are in the range of 1.22–8.128 ppm. The N–H protons (H50, H52, H54, H56) experimentally resonate at

EP

1.22–1.27 ppm as a doublet which these chemical shifts are theoretically predicted in the range of 1.8956–2.3284 and 1.2178–2.3352 ppm at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and

AC C

PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p), respectively. The multiplet signal in the range of 2.107–2.203 ppm is assigned to methylene protons between two phosphoryl groups (H70, H71). This chemical shift theoretically occurs at 2.4418–2.6844 and 0.9932–2.2013 ppm at the B3LYP/6311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) levels of theory, respectively. The multiplet signal in the range of 3.928–4.035 ppm is assigned to methylene protons for the benzyl groups (H58, H59, H61, H62, H64, H65, H67, H68). This chemical shift occurs theoretically at 4.2051–5.8304 and 3.305–4.7273 ppm at the B3LYP/6311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) levels of theory, respectively. Twenty protons have 9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT remained, which are related to the aromatic protons. The multiplet at 6.828–8.128 ppm corresponds to the phenyl ring protons that are calculated at 7.8256−9.2759 and 7.082−9.1079 ppm by B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p), respectively. In the last two rows of Table 6, the two parameters R2 and RMSE are presented. The

RI PT

value of the squared correlation coefficients (R2) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were calculated in MATLAB, version R2010a [9]. The squared correlation coefficients values obtained at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) (0.9707) level are slightly larger than those at the other

SC

levels. This indicates that for the system under study, the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) provides more reliable 1H chemical shifts than the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) and the two PBE1PBE levels.

M AN U

On the other hand, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) values obtained at the PBE1PBE/6-311G(d,p) (0.5010) level are slightly smaller than those at the other levels. The RMSE of the calculated 1H NMR chemical shifts is calculated to be 1.0267, 1.0020 and 0.5581 at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p)

TE D

levels, respectively. However, in the statistical data analyses, the most robust technique among the others that which has the highest values of R2 and the lowest RMSE values.

AC C

EP





In summary, there are three classes of carbons in the MBDPA molecule, including:

methylene carbon between two phosphoryl groups, methylene carbons for the benzyl groups, and phenyl ring carbons. The

13

C chemical shifts (with respect to TMS) are assigned in the

range of 42.83−153.19 and 39.08−148.51 ppm by B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6311+G(d,p), respectively, while the corresponding experimental data are observed in the range of 88.524−141.09 ppm (Figure 4 and Table 7). The largest deviation between the calculated and experimental

13

CNMR chemical shifts (δexp-δcal) are seen for C69, C57, C60,

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT C63 and C66 (methylene carbons that all have positive deviations ) the theoretical chemical shifts of phenyl ring carbons are smaller than methylene carbons and all have negative deviations. In Table 7, the squared correlation coefficients (R2) values obtained at the B3LYP/6-

RI PT

311+G(d,p) (0.9767) level are to a small degree larger than those at the other levels. This indicates that for the system under study, the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) provides more reliable 13

C chemical shifts than the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) and PBE1PBE levels. Moreover, the root-

SC

mean-square error (RMSE) values acquired at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) (18.2112) level are slightly smaller than those at the other levels.

M AN U

The RMSE of the calculated 1H NMR chemical shifts is calculated to be 0.5010– 1.0267 at the B3LYP, and PBE1PBE levels. Besides, the average absolute standard deviation of

13

C chemical shifts is 18.2112–19.5461 at the B3LYP and PBE1PBE levels. This clearly

indicates the larger deviation of

C chemical shifts from the experimental data than that of

H chemical shifts, because in the title compound, the 1H chemical shifts are assigned in the

TE D

1

13

range of 1.22–8.128 ppm and the

C chemical shifts are assigned in the range of





AC C

EP

88.524−141.09 ppm.

13

31

P NMR is a predominant method for studying phosphorus-containing compounds.

Chemical shifts in

31

PNMR normally depend on the concentration of the taster, the solvent

used, and the presence of other chemical compounds. The reason is that the external standard does not take into account the bulk properties of the sample. It is possible to evaluate and correlate the magnitude and orientation of the chemical shielding anisotropy tensor with differences in: (I) the bond order of the adjacent bonds, (II)

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the charge on the atom x, (III) the a-b-x bond angles, dihedral angles and (IV) the a-x distances (that "a" is a target nucleus and "x" another atom that influence on "a"). There are two phosphors in MBDPA that appear to have the same chemical environments. Obviously, the 31P NMR spectrum of MBDPA shows only one signal at 22.8407 ppm that is multiplet,

slight difference in the 31P chemical shifts.( Table 8)
31

P chemical shifts (with respect to H3PO4) are assigned in the range of

SC

The

RI PT

which was affected by the factors mentioned above. The result of the calculations shows a

10.5737−11.1336 and 7.8582−7.9337 ppm by B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) and PBE1PBE/6-

M AN U

311+G(d,p), respectively, while the corresponding experimental data are observed in 22.8407 ppm (Figure 5 and Table 8) The minor deviation between the calculated and experimental 31P NMR chemical shifts (δexp-δcal) are observed for B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) calculation method and the major deviation for PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p).

TE D



The relationship between the experimental and computed chemical shifts of 1H and 13C NMR

EP

is shown in Figure 6. As is evident, the correlation between the experimental and calculated chemical shifts is better for

13

C atoms than for 1H atoms. This discrepancy is reasonable as

AC C

the 1H chemical shifts more quickly responded to solvent effects [20, 21] As seen in Figure 6, the squared correlation coefficients (R2) values obtained at the B3LYP level are slightly larger than those at the PBE1PBE level. This indicates that for the system under study, the B3LYP provides more reliable

13

C chemical shifts than the PBE1PBE. This may be due to

the proper description of the structure of this molecule by the former density functional.


12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4.4. Frontier molecular orbital analysis The molecular orbital energy diagram for the HOMOs, the LUMOs and bond gap for MBDPA are presented in Figure 7. It is well-known that chemical stability of a molecule is principally affected by the frontier orbitals [22]. The highest occupied molecular orbital

RI PT

(HOMO) characterizes electron-donating ability, while the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) represents electron accepting ability. As a result, it is expected that the energy difference between the HOMO and LUMO (HOMO-LUMO energy gap) displays the

SC

chemical activity of the molecule. The calculated energy gap of the title compound is -5.943 and -6.033 eV at the B3LYP and PBE1PBE levels, respectively. Therefore, a relatively

M AN U

smaller amount of kinetic stability is predicted for this molecule at the B3LYP level. Note that the relatively higher energy gap between the HOMO and LUMO of MBDPA at the PBE1PBE level, compared to that at the B3LYP, can be associated with the large destabilization of the LUMO (Figure7).

TE D



Selected atomic charges of MBDPA calculated by natural population analysis (NPA)



AC C

EP

are presented in Figure 8 and Table 9.

All atoms: O2, O3, N49, N51, N53, N55, C57, C60, C63, C66, and C69 are

negatively charged. P1 and P4 and carbon's other atoms are positively charged. The largest value of negative charge is located on the O2 and O3 atoms, ca. -1.096 and -1.101 (-1.089 and-1.106) at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) (PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p)) level. On the other hand, the P1 and P4 atoms have the most positive charge 2.204 and 2.198 (2.203 and 2.199) at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) (PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p)) level.

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT


According to Table 9, the calculated dipole moment value of the title compound at the B3LYP is less than PBE1PBE levels. For a given density functional, the addition of diffuse

RI PT

functions to the 6-311G(d,p) basis set has a significant influence on the calculated dipole moment value. The interaction between two molecules is expressed via the interaction between atoms. It expresses the interaction energy as the sum of three terms: the columbic or

SC

electrostatic interaction, the attractive charge-transfer term (due to the mixing of filled orbitals on one molecule with empty orbitals on the others) and the closed-shell repulsion

M AN U

[22]. Therefore, in the nucleophilic/electrophilic reactions, dipole moment value ‘charge controlled’ and bond gap ‘orbital controlled’ play an important role in the occurrence of a reaction. 4.5. MEP analysis

TE D

In a molecule, it is very important to identify nucleophilic and electrophilic sites so as to predict its reactivity. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) is an advanced method to

EP

identify the sites for the electrophilic and nucleophilic attack in a molecule [23]. The positive area of the MEP is indicative of a nucleophilic site, and the negative area is associated with

AC C

an electrophilic site. The values of the electrostatic potential at the surface are indicated by various colors: red represents areas of most negative electrostatic potential; green corresponds to areas of approximately zero potential; and blue corresponds to an area of most positive electrostatic potential. The incremental arrangement of potential is red < orange

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The electrophilic, nucleophilic color range in MBDPA is – 6.333 to 6.333 e-2. One can see that the most negative region(red color) on the MEP map of MBDPA is associated with the lone-pairs of the oxygen atom. This indicates that the oxygen atom of this molecule is the most reactive site to interact favorably with an acidic reagent in the protonation reaction or an

RI PT

appropriate ligand for the complexation reaction. On the other hand, the MEP of MBDPA shows the presence of negative regions (yellow color area) around the carbon atoms of phenyl groups, which clearly indicates the propensity of these sites for the formation of

SC

intermolecular interactions with potential electron-rich sites (e.g. π-π interactions). The corresponding contour map is graphically represented in Figure 9.

M AN U

4.6. Anti urease activity

The concentration that induces an inhibition halfway between the minimum and maximum response of compound (relative IC50) was specified to monitor the inhibition effect of various concentrations of MBDPA in the assay. The IC50 value for the title compound is

TE D

5.23nM (0.00523 µM). It is significant that the urease inhibitory activity of the title compound is very superior to that of the acetohydroxamic acid co-assayed as a positive

AC C

5. Conclusion

EP

reference with the IC50 value of 41.27 ± 0.17 µM. [24]

The main conclusions obtained in this study can be summarized as follows: 1.

The title compound; MBDPA, was synthesized under argon gas and dry solvent via reaction of methylenebis(phosphonic dichloride) and benzylamine. The structure of MBDPA was characterized by FT-IR, 1H, 13C NMR and 31P NMR.

2.

Full geometry optimization of MBDPA, was performed by the B3LYP and PBE1PBE methods with 6-311G(d,p) and 6-311+G(d,p) basis sets. The comparison between the calculated and experimental values indicated that the 15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) can predict the bond lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles of MBDPA better than the PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) method. This can be expected to be of particular use in inferring complete information which cannot be inferred crystallographically. In addition, it is noted that the calculated frequencies by B3LYP method are all in

RI PT

3.

good agreement with the experimental vibrational frequencies. 4.

The result of the comparison between the experimental and computed chemical

calculated chemical shifts is better for

13

SC

shifts of 1H and 13C NMR is shown the correlation between the experimental and C atoms than for 1H atoms and the

M AN U

squared correlation coefficients (R2) values obtained at the B3LYP level are slightly larger than those at the PBE1PBE level. The results of the study show that for the system under study, the B3LYP provides more reliable 13C chemical shifts than the PBE1PBE.

The molecular electrostatic potential map of MBDPA indicates that the oxygen

TE D

5.

atoms are the most reactive sites to electrophilic attack. 6.

The measurement of urease inhibitory activity was carried out. It is remarkable

EP

that the urease inhibitory activity of the title compound is very superior to that of

AC C

the acetohydroxamic acid co-assayed as a positive reference.

Acknowledgement

The financial supports of this work was provided by Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran and by the Research Office of Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

References

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [1] K. Chruszcz, M. Baranska, K. Czarniecki, L.M. Proniewicz, Experimental and calculated 1H,

13

C and

31

P

NMR spectra of (hydroxypyridin-3-yl-methyl)phosphonic acid, Journal of Molecular Structure 651–653 (2003) 729-737. [2] G.W. McCarthy, J.M. Bremner, J.S.Lee, Inhibition of plant and microbial ureases by phosphoroamides, Plant Soil 127(1990) 269-283.

RI PT

[3] L. Asadi, K. Gholivand, K. Zare, Phosphorhydrazides as urease and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: biological evaluation and QSAR study, J IRAN CHEM SOC 13(7) (2016) 1213-1223.

[4] Z.L. You, L. Zhang, D.H. Shi, L.L. Ni, Synthesis and crystal structure of a novel one-dimensional silver (I)

SC

complex with high urease inhibitory activity, Inorganic Chemistry Communications 12(12) (2009) 12311233.

Plant Soil 127(2) (1990) 269-283.

M AN U

[5] G.W. McCarthy, J.M. Bremner, J.S. Lee, Inhibition of plant and microbial ureases by phosphoroamides,

[6] M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, J.A. Montgomery Jr., T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin, J.C. Burant, J.M. Millam, S.S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi,G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G.A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J.E. Knox, H.P.

TE D

Hratchian, J.B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, P.Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, V.G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A.D. Daniels, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, D.K. Malick, A.D.

EP

Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J.B. Foresman, J.V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A.G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al- Laham,

AC C

C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, J.A. Pople, Gaussian 03, Revision D.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2005. [7] K. Wolinski, J.F. Hinton, P. Pulay, Efficient implementation of the gauge-independent atomic orbital method for NMR chemical shift calculations, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112(23) (1990) 8251-8260 [8] R.I.I. Dennington, T. Keith, J. Millam, GaussView Version 6, Semichem Inc., Shawnee Mission, KS, 2017. [9] A.E. Reed, L.A. Curtiss, F. Weinhold, Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donoracceptor viewpoint, Chem. Rev. 88(6) (1988) 899-926. [10] M.H. Jamróz, Vibrational Energy Distribution Analysis VEDA 4, Warsaw, Poland, 2004 -2010 [11] Matlab 2010a; A sophisticated mathematical calculation environment; Mathworks; USA; 2010.

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [12] K Gholivand, M. Pourayoubi, Z. Shariatinia, H. Mostaanzadeh, The effect of various substituents on the structural parameters of the P(O)[N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)]2 moiety. Syntheses and spectroscopic characterization of some new phosphoramidates, crystal structures of P(O)(X)[N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)]2, X = C6H5C(O)NH, Cl and CCl3C(O)NH, Polyhedron 24(5) (2005) 655-662. [13] K. Gholivand, A.A.E. Valmoozi, H.R. Mahzouni, Structural and electronic aspects of hydrogen bonding in

RI PT

two polymorphs of butylene-N,N' bis(O,O-' diarylphosphoramidate), Acta Cryst. B69 (2013) 55-61

[14] K. Gholivand, A.A. Ebrahimi Valmoozi, A. Gholami, M. Dusek, V. Eigner, S. Abolghasemi, Synthesis, characterization,

crystal

structures,

QSAR

study

and

antibacterial

activities

of

organotin

SC

bisphosphoramidates.Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 806(15) (2016) 33-44

[15] K.Gholivand, H. Mostaanzadeh, S. Farshadian, Tetrakis(benzylamino)phosphonium chloride Acta Cryst. E67 (2011) o311 doi.org/10.1107/S1600536810054401.

M AN U

[16] K. Gholivand, F. Molaei, J. Thibonnet, A novel Zn(II) complex of N-nicotinyl phosphoramide: Combined experimental and computational studies, Journal of Molecular Structure 1092(15) (2015) 130-136. [17] R.M. Silverstein, G.C. Basseler, T.C. Morill, Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 4th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981. QD272.S6 S55.

[18] K. Gholivand, L. Asadi, A.A. Ebrahimi Valmoozi, M. Hodaii, M. Sharifi, H. Mazruee Kashani, H.R.

TE D

Mahzouni, M. Ghadamyari, A.A. Kalate, E. Davari, S. Salehia, M. Bonsaiic, Phosphorhydrazide inhibitors: toxicological profile and antimicrobial evaluation assay, molecular modeling and QSAR study, RSC Adv. 6(29) (2016) 24175–24189.

EP

[19] K. Gholivand, A.A. Ebrahimi Valmoozi, M. Bonsaii, Synthesis, biological evaluation, QSAR study and molecular docking of novel N-(4-amino carbonylpiperazinyl) (thio)phosphoramide derivatives as

AC C

cholinesterase inhibitors, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 112 (2014) 40-50. [20] J.C. Facelli, A.C. de Dios Modeling NMR chemical shifts: gaining insights into structure and environment, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1999. [21] A. Kawasaki, Effect of substituents on the

13

C chemical shifts of the azomethine carbon atom of N-

benzylideneanilines and 2-N-arylimino-2-p-nitrophenylethanenitriles, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. (2)(1990) 223-228. [22] M. Bonsaii, K. Gholivand, K. Abdi, A.A.E. Valmoozi, M. Khosravi, A combined experimental and computational study on the interaction of nitrogen mustards with DNA, MedChemComm 7(10) (2016)20032015.

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [23] A. Rajavel, A. Aditya Prasad, T. Jeyakumar, Polymorphs of 4-isopropylbenzylidine thiophene-2carbohydrazide: Crystal growth and density functional theory computations, Journal of Molecular Structure, 1130(2) (2017) 138-149. [24] W.N. Fishbein, P.P. Carbone,Urease Catalysis: II. INHIBITION OF THE ENZYME BY HYDROXYUREA HYDROXYLAMINE, AND ACETOHYDROXAMIC ACID, J Biol Chem. 240(6)

O +

P

Cl

P

H N

NH2

Cl Cl

O

O

P

P

N H

CH2Cl2, 273 K

M AN U

Cl

SC

O

RI PT

(1965) 2407-2414.

AC C

EP

TE D

Scheme 1. The synthetic pathway for the title compound.

19

H N N H

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

Fig. 1. The optimized structure and atom numbering of methylenebis(N,N'-dibenzylphosphoramidate)

20

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 2. Linear correlations between the experimental and calculated bond lengths of MBDPA

21

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

Fig. 3. The deviation of calculated 1H chemical shifts from the corresponding experimental values

22

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 4. The deviation of calculated 13C chemical shifts from the corresponding experimental values

23

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

Fig. 5. The deviation of calculated 31P chemical shifts from the corresponding experimental values

24

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fig. 6. Correlation between the experimental and calculated 1H and 13C chemical shifts of MBDPA

25

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

Fig. 7. Molecular orbitals energy(in eV) diagrams of the HOMO and LUMO'S for MBDPA

26

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

Fig. 8. The atomic charges of MBDPA calculated by natural population analysis at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)level. (Hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity, atomic charge negative, zero and positive are presented with, red < black < green color, respectively )

27

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

Fig. 9. (a,b) Molecular electrostatic potential maps, solid and transparent form. (c) Contour maps of ESP

28

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. The selected calculated bond lengths (Å) of title compound at different levels of theory B3LYP/ 6-311+G(d,p) 1.4947 1.6748 1.6812 1.8476 1.4996 1.6708 1.6879 1.8387 1.3967 1.4013 1.5183 1.3957 1.3919 1.392 1.3962 1.4687 1.4912 1.4726 1.4773

AC C

EP

TE D

P1-O2 P1-N51 P1-N53 P1-C69 P4-O3 P4-N49 P4-N55 P4-C69 C27-C28 C27-C29 C27-C63 C28-C30 C29-C32 C30-C34 C32-C34 N49-C60 N51-C66 N53-C63 N55-C57

B3LYP/ 6-311G(d,p) 1.4964 1.6733 1.6833 1.8465 1.4984 1.6739 1.6851 1.8453 1.3965 1.401 1.5189 1.3946 1.3917 1.3916 1.3953 1.4772 1.488 1.4709 1.4728

PBE1PBE / 6-311G(d,p) 1.4916 1.6635 1.674 1.8307 1.4932 1.6642 1.6788 1.8306 1.3926 1.3967 1.5113 1.3908 1.3884 1.3884 1.3916 1.4644 1.4744 1.4581 1.4635

M AN U

Bond length

29

PBE1PBE / 6-311+G(d,p) 1.4915 1.6653 1.6735 1.8306 1.4933 1.6646 1.6782 1.8309 1.3927 1.3968 1.5113 1.3909 1.3884 1.3884 1.3917 1.4652 1.4754 1.4582 1.4632

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Bond angle

B3LYP/ 6-311G(d,p) 112.9425 118.7465 111.2808 100.123 110.6116 102.1787 121.0186 110.5819 111.2619 98.8451 105.5979 108.4046 119.0192 120.0027 120.9763 120.7762 120.1515 119.9106 120.4769 125.4227 120.4865 123.5045 114.4854 118.0571

B3LYP/ 6-311+G(d,p) 113.2072 118.8682 111.0084 100.2661 110.4886 102.0334 114.4442 116.2357 111.987 102.0471 108.7564 102.2272 119.022 120.0129 120.9624 120.7651 120.1919 119.9058 120.4463 126.4722 119.6805 123.2652 114.3368 115.5111

AC C

EP

TE D

O2-P1-N51 O2-P1-N53 O2-P1-C69 N51-P1-N53 N51-P1-C69 N53-P1-C69 O3-P4-N49 O3-P4-N55 O3-P4-C69 N49-P4-N55 N49-P4-C69 N55-P4-C69 C28-C27-C29 C28-C27-C63 C29-C27-C63 C27-C28-C30 C27-C29-C32 C28-C30-C34 C29-C32-C34 P4-N49-C60 P1-N51-C66 P1-N53-C63 C27-C63-N53 P1-C69-P4

M AN U

Table 2. The selected calculated bond angles (°) of title compound at different levels of theory

30

PBE1PBE / 6-311G(d,p) 112.8951 118.8603 111.4845 100.1726 110.3609 102.0627 120.9907 110.3616 111.6651 98.9462 105.2345 108.4843 119.1418 120.0361 120.8202 120.7238 120.0712 119.8989 120.4882 124.4502 120.0636 123.2798 114.4497 117.2658

PBE1PBE / 6-311+G(d,p) 113.0176 118.7245 111.4984 100.2117 110.2189 102.1506 121.0683 110.3311 111.5839 98.9716 105.2147 108.5272 119.1363 120.0355 120.8265 120.7281 120.0756 119.8939 120.4863 124.3486 119.7007 123.2225 114.4423 117.2674

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Dihedral angle

B3LYP/ 6-311G(d,p) 24.0924 -53.4035 -60.5769 62.4744 -27.0084 -41.8912

B3LYP/ 6-311+G(d,p) 28.5837 -50.4682 -49.8751 36.3634 -28.8961 -48.5891

AC C

EP

TE D

O2-P1-N51-C66 O2-P1-N53-C63 O2-P1-C69-P4 O3-P4-N49-C60 O3-P4-N55-C57 O3-P4-C69-P1

M AN U

Table 3. The selected calculated dihedral angles (°) of title compound at different levels of theory

31

PBE1PBE/ 6-311G(d,p) 22.9507 -55.0018 -60.5155 63.7715 -31.0077 -38.969

PBE1PBE/ 6-311+G(d,p) 22.6943 -53.9305 -60.4098 63.4446 -30.7348 -38.8053

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 4. Experimental infrared of MBDPA and the theoretical harmonic frequencies (υ, cm-1), infrared intensities (A), calculated for MBDPA by the B3LYP and PBE1PBE methods with the 6/311+G(d,p) basis set. Band assignmentsc A 19 27 36 34 11 25 22 30 9 19 18 19 12 4 5 3 0 3 7 2 14 6 14 9 3 1 3 18 19 42 36 5 33 75 5 4 3 1 1 0 1 1 11 16 10 6 17 4 11 9 10 7

Mode no. 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104

Exp. IR

B3LYP υ A 1485 10 1483 12 1455 89 1436 55 1435 18 1429 85 1424 95 1394 4 1388 1 1377 5 1369 7 1361 3 1361 4 1360 3 1353 16 1339 3 1336 9 1327 12 1322 6 1272 11 1248 17 1245 31 1238 30 1232 38 1222 5 1221 55 1219 2 1213 87 1211 18 1210 4 1204 10 1203 3 1200 108 1190 121 1182 0 1182 0 1181 0 1181 0 1117 6 1114 19 1107 38 1107 7 1105 64 1094 6 1090 21 1065 221 1060 156 1052 3 1051 17 1050 88 1049 55 1024 3

M AN U

PBE0 υ 3620 3608 3604 3593 3215 3213 3213 3213 3206 3202 3202 3201 3198 3194 3191 3191 3188 3186 3183 3181 3176 3176 3174 3171 3138 3134 3130 3083 3080 3080 3074 3072 3044 3032 1676 1676 1676 1672 1655 1655 1654 1653 1539 1539 1538 1535 1513 1510 1496 1493 1492 1492

υ(N-H) υ(N-H) υ(N-H) υ(N-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-H) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C) υ(C-C) υ(C-C) υ(C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-H) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(C-C-C) υ(C-C) δ(H-C-C), υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-H) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-H) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-H) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-H)

TE D

3455 w 3424 m 3401 m 3301 s 3262 m 3239 s 3208 s 3193 s 3185 s 3178 s 3170 s 3162 s 3154 s 3147 s 3139 s 3131 s 3124 m 3116 m 3108 m 3100 m 3093 m 3085 m 3077 s 3070 s 3062 s 3054 s 3046 s 3039 s 3023 s 3000 m 2985 m 2969 s 2954 s 2915 s 1658 w 1635 w 1627 w 1619 w 1612 w 1604 w 1596 w 1589 w 1581 w 1573 w 1565 w 1542 w 1511 w 1496 w 1488 w 1481 w 1473 w

B3LYP υ A 3580 14 3576 22 3567 21 3556 26 3189 16 3186 29 3186 32 3185 34 3178 10 3178 22 3176 13 3175 18 3171 21 3170 8 3168 18 3166 11 3161 3 3161 2 3159 4 3159 9 3155 2 3151 6 3150 8 3146 10 3115 2 3108 1 3108 4 3066 52 3062 24 3060 15 3054 8 3045 41 3024 37 3022 60 1647 3 1647 5 1647 3 1645 1 1626 0 1626 0 1625 0 1625 0 1531 7 1531 14 1530 8 1527 6 1521 21 1518 6 1500 7 1490 10 1486 6 1485 11

EP

Exp. IR

AC C

Mode no. 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 200 199 198 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156

1465 s 1457 s 1450 s 1442 s 1434 s 1427 m 1419 m 1411 w 1403 w 1396 w 1388 w 1380 w 1373 w 1365 w 1249 w 1241 w 1234 w 1226 w 1211 m 1203 m 1195 m 1187 s 1180 s 1172 s 1164 s 1157 s 1133 m 1126 m 1118 s 1110 s 1103 s 1095 m 1087 m 1079 m 1072 m 1064 m 1056 1049 w 1033 w

PBE0 υ 1488 1477 1454 1439 1433 1430 1411 1394 1388 1378 1377 1373 1372 1370 1364 1352 1345 1339 1333 1275 1256 1249 1247 1243 1240 1238 1236 1231 1216 1211 1210 1201 1201 1188 1180 1180 1179. 1179 1143 1136 1118 1116 1111 1110 1100 1099 1095 1062 1062 1061 1058 1031

Band assignments† A 8 17 110 25 193 45 15 2 2 3 4 1 2 5 6 5 15 10 6 14 31 72 76 16 20 44 6 79 15 3 1 5 97 110 0 0 0 0 38 33 48 8 9 50 18 152 41 10 14 13 8 2

υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-H), υ(C-C), δ(H-N-C), δ(H-C-H) υ(C-C), δ(H-N-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-N-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-N-C), δ(H-C-H) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-H), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-N-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-N-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), υ(P=O), δ(H-C-C) υ(P=O) δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), υ(P=O) υ(P=O), τ(H-C-P-N) δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-P), δ(H-C-C) υ(C-C), δ(H-C-C), δ(H-C-P), υ(C-C) υ(N-C) δ(H-C-P), υ(N-C) δ(H-C-P), δ(H-C-C) δ(H-C-C) υ(N-C), δ(C-C-C), δ(H-C-C) υ(N-C) τ(H-C-C-C)

Abbreviations: m, medium; s, strong; w, weak; υ, stretching; δ, bending; τ, torsion; γ, out-of-plane torsion. † Band assignments calculated by PBE1PBE and B3LYP using the VEDA 4 program.

32

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 5. Experimental infrared of MBDPA and the theoretical harmonic frequencies (υ, cm-1), infrared intensities (A), calculated for MBDPA by the B3LYP and PBE1PBE methods with the 6/311+G(d,p) basis set. Exp. IR 1025 w

B3LYP υ A 1022 3

PBE1PBE υ A 1027 2

Band assignmentsc τ(H-C-C-C)

Mode no. 51

1018 w

1018

2

1021

1

δ(C-C-C)

101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52

1010 w 1002 w

1017 1017 1015 1014 1008 1006 998 992 990 988 986 980 968 949 939 934 929 897 869 867 866 863 850 836 830 828 817 807 796 783 768 761 758 756 744 720 720 719 718 695 636 636 635 635 610 606 604 591 567 547

1 0 1 10 2 2 13 1 0 0 1 2 1 25 15 4 5 47 1 2 6 0 119 130 30 17 47 16 203 6 73 4 38 26 13 12 58 59 24 12 0 1 2 2 31 16 2 4 40 62

1021 1019 1017 1016 1012 1012 1004 998 997 995 992 981 970 956 939 939 935 911 874 872 872 868 865 847 839 836 830 820 809 787 780 766 762 761 752 723 723 722 720 712 633 632 632 631 617 610 608 594 572 562

2 1 1 5 1 2 12 1 2 0 0 2 2 28 7 7 6 51 1 3 20 0 113 135 22 12 48 13 178 22 28 2 34 41 13 38 42 26 63 8 1 3 0 2 56 16 26 11 35 83

δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) υ(P-N), δ(C-C-N), δ(C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C) υ(P-N), υ(C-C), δ(C-C-C) υ(P-N), υ(C-C), δ(C-C-C) υ(P-N), υ(C-C), δ(C-C-C), δ(C-C-C) υ(P-N), δ(C-C-C) υ(P-N) υ(P-N), υ(P-C), τ(H-C-P-N) υ(P-C) τ(H-C-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C), τ(C-C-C-C) υ(P-C), τ(H-C-C-C), υ(P-N) τ(H-C-C-C),τ(C-C-C-N), δ(H-C-C), τ(H-C-C-C),τ(C-C-C-N) τ(C-C-C-N), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(C-C-C-N) υ(P-C) δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C), δ(H-C-C), τ(C-C-C-C) δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-N) δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C), δ(C-C-N) δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C), τ(H-N-C-C) δ(C-C-C), τ(H-N-C-C)

AC C

EP

TE D

102

979 w 971 w 964 w 956 w 941 w 933 w 925 w 918 w 910 w 902 w 837 w 825 w 817 w 809 w 802 w 763 w 756 w 748 w 740 w 734 w 732.w 725 w 717 w 702 w 694 w 686 w 678 w 609 w 601 w 594 w 586 w 578 w 516 w 509 w

Exp. IR

B3LYP

υ 543

M AN U

Mode no. 103

501 w

A 81

PBE1PBE υ A 551 124

Band assignments† δ(C-C-C), τ(H-N-C-C), τ(H-C-CC)

50

493 w

537

66

537

53

49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

462 w 455 w 447 w 439 w 416.w 408 w 401 w

517 504 488 479 462 436 427 423 418 417 417 414 407 369 347 345 339 334 320 315 273 260 246 220 203 196 193 178 156 149 141 126 119 99 85 75 69 61 47 41 38 36 34 24 19 16 15 13 10

6 64 4 57 60 20 49 30 3 0 1 15 8 19 14 5 3 16 6 4 12 6 2 2 2 9 1 14 8 3 3 4 6 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

516 509 489 485 470 441 435 427 418 416 416 414 409 376 352 345 340 338 321 316 273 266 246 222 205 198 195 180 159 150 138 132 125 100 88 77 70 65 50 43 38 37 34 23 21 18 13 12 9.9

11 42 4 43 50 21 79 4 6 1 0 5 5 18 8 11 7 57 6 5 14 7 2 2 2 9 1 14 10 4 2 8 2 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.

δ(C-C-C), τ(H-N-C-C), τ(H-C-CC)

δ(C-C-C) δ(C-C-C), τ(H-N-C-C) τ(C-C-C-N), τ(C-C-C-C), δ(O-P-N), τ(H-N-C-C) δ(O-P-N) τ(C-C-C-C) δ(O-P-N), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(H-N-C-C) τ(H-C-C-C), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(C-C-C-N), τ(C-C-C-C) τ(C-C-C-N) τ(C-C-C-C) δ(O-P-N), τ(H-N-C-C) γ(O-C-N-P) ), τ(P-N-C-C) δ(C-C-N),γ(O-C-N-P) τ(H-C-C-C) δ(C-C-C) γ(N-C-N-P) τ(C-C-C-C) δ(C-C-C) γ(N-C-N-P) δ(C-P-N), γ(N-C-N-P) τ(N-C-C-C) δ(P-C-N) τ(P-N-C-C) δ(P-N-C) δ(P-N-C), δ(C-P-N), δ(C-N-P), γ(O-C-N-P) δ(C-N-P), δ(N-P-N) δ(C-N-P), δ(P-C-P) δ(P-C-P) τ(C-P-N-C) δ(N-P-N), τ(C-N-P-C) δ(C-N-P), τ(C-N-P-C) δ(N-P-N), δ(C-P-N) τ(P-C-P-N) τ(C-C-N-P), τ(P-N-C-C) τ(C-C-N-P), τ(N-C-C-C) τ(C-C-C-N), τ(N-C-C-C) τ(C-C-C-N), τ(N-C-C-C) δ(C-N-P), τ(C-C-C-N) τ(C-C-C-N) τ(C-C-C-N), τ(C-C-N-P) τ(C-C-N-P), τ(P-N-C-C) τ(C-C-C-N), τ(C-C-N-P) τ(N-C-C-C), τ(C-P-N-C) τ(C-N-P-C), τ(P-N-C-C) τ(C-N-P-C) τ(C-C-N-P), τ(P-N-C-C)

Abbreviations: m, medium; s, strong; w, weak; υ, stretching; δ, bending; τ, torsion; γ, out-of-plane torsion. † Band assignments calculated by PBE1PBE and B3LYP using the VEDA 4 program.

33

Table 6. Calculated (

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

cal) and experimental (

B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)

B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)

Atom -1.0875 -0.9114 -1.4959 -1.1441 -1.1534 -0.2813 -1.6719 -0.1937 -1.3761 -0.3395 -0.2036 -0.6808 -1.9401 -0.5834 -1.8524 -1.004 -1.8153 -1.4068 -0.8493 -0.7431 -0.4264 -0.7276 -0.7195 -0.2677 -0.7946 -0.7429 -0.8375 -0.8361 -0.9637 -0.9388 -1.054 -0.9551 -1.0423 -0.9623 0.9634 1.0267

PBE1PBE/6-311G(d,p)

PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p) δexp

δcal

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

2.0767 2.0562 1.8956 2.3284 2.6844 2.4418 5.5052 4.2631 5.225 5.679 4.2051 4.7571 5.8304 5.3768 8.4257 8.6149 9.2759 9.1908 8.1369 8.4648 8.2225 8.5596 8.1133 8.4191 8.1964 8.1836 8.1417 8.2286 8.144 8.113 8.0842 8.3641 8.0891 7.8256

-0.8067 -0.8362 -0.6756 -1.0584 -0.4814 -0.3348 -1.5752 -0.2931 -1.255 -1.689 -0.2151 -0.7271 -1.8204 -1.3418 -0.2977 -0.5049 -1.3859 -1.3008 -0.5269 -0.8548 -0.3325 -1.0796 -0.6333 -0.5291 -0.8464 -0.8336 -0.9217 -0.924 -1.054 -1.023 -1.1242 -1.4041 -1.2591 -0.9956

2.0508 1.0301 1.7754 1.7849 2.0325 1.1226 4.7316 3.8551 4.5723 3.5261 3.258 3.818 4.2065 3.8669 9.0786 8.9199 8.9732 7.8543 7.847 7.6977 7.7452 7.3093 7.6255 7.6842 7.6191 7.4788 7.4681 7.4755 7.4692 7.6194 7.4008 7.3494 7.4877 7.1594

-0.7808 0.1899 -0.5554 -0.5149 -0.1705 0.9844 -0.8016 0.1149 -0.6023 0.4639 0.732 0.212 -0.1965 0.1681 -0.9506 -0.8099 -1.0832 0.0357 -0.237 -0.0877 0.1448 0.1707 -0.1455 0.2058 -0.2691 -0.1288 -0.2481 -0.2555 -0.3792 -0.5294 -0.4408 -0.3894 -0.6577 -0.3294

2.3352 1.2178 1.8803 2.024 2.2013 0.9932 4.7273 3.8698 4.7534 3.5098 3.305 3.9233 4.5052 4.061 8.9901 9.1079 8.9313 8.1305 7.8737 7.7421 7.7828 7.082 7.7048 7.7499 7.5661 7.5057 7.4716 7.4677 7.5108 7.6485 7.5095 7.354 7.5452 7.1981

-1.0652 0.0022 -0.6603 -0.754 -0.0017 1.1138 -0.7973 0.02 -0.7834 0.4802 0.685 0.1067 -0.4952 -0.026 -0.8621 -0.9979 -1.0413 -0.2405 -0.2637 -0.1321 0.1072 0.398 -0.2248 0.1401 -0.2161 -0.1557 -0.2516 -0.2477 -0.4208 -0.5585 -0.5495 -0.394 -0.7152 -0.3681

TE D

2.3575 2.1314 2.7159 2.4141 2.3564 2.3883 5.6019 4.1637 5.3461 4.3295 4.1936 4.7108 5.9501 4.6184 9.9804 9.1140 9.7053 9.2968 8.4593 8.3531 8.3164 8.2076 8.1995 8.1577 8.1446 8.0929 8.0575 8.0561 8.0537 8.0288 8.014 7.9151 7.8723 7.7923

AC C

H50 H52 H54 H 56 H 70 H 71 H 58 H 59 H 61 H 62 H 64 H 65 H 67 H 68 H 44 H 11 H 33 H 20 H 47 H 36 H 14 H 24 H 48 H 42 H 46 H 37 H 15 H 26 H 13 H 25 H 35 H9 H 22 H 31 R2 RMSE

δexp-δcal

EP

δcal

exp) 1H chemical shifts of the title compound.

0.9707 1.0020

0.960 0.5010

34

0.9618 0.5581

1.27 1.22 1.22 1.27 2.203 2.107 3.93 3.95 3.97 3.99 3.99 4.03 4.01 4.035 8.128 8.11 7.89 7.89 7.61 7.61 7.89 7.48 7.48 7.89 7.35 7.35 7.22 7.22 7.09 7.09 6.96 6.96 6.83 6.83

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 7. Calculated (δcal) and experimental (δexp) 13C chemical shifts of the title compound. B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)

B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)

PBE1PBE/6-311G(d,p)

PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p)

δcal

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

C5 C16 C38 C27 C40 C7 C29 C17 C32 C39 C19 C10 C43 C45 C34 C21 C23 C41

154.1161 153.3024 151.5365 151.0359 144.1215 140.9198 140.8865 140.3896 138.7936 138.5527 138.2051 137.9295 137.7998 136.6761 136.6431 136.597 136.4972 136.2541

-13.0163 -12.2026 -10.4367 -9.9361 -15.3181 -12.1164 -12.0831 -11.5862 -11.2506 -9.7493 -10.6621 -10.3865 -10.2568 -10.0127 -9.9797 -9.1175 -9.8338 -8.7746

152.98775 152.07015 153.18835 151.91555 138.75665 139.78035 140.10155 141.16525 138.33275 138.61505 138.27825 137.06905 136.70545 135.61425 136.01805 135.79585 136.19575 136.93585

-11.88795 -10.97035 -12.08855 -10.81575 -9.95325 -10.97695 -11.29815 -12.36185 -10.78975 -9.81165 -10.73525 -9.52605 -9.16245 -8.95085 -9.35465 -8.31635 -9.53235 -9.45635

148.5822 147.7296 146.9809 146.6532 138.0132 135.3643 137.2601 135.1583 135.0082 136.2878 133.9876 134.4823 134.2017 132.8676 132.7956 134.5928 133.0069 133.379

-7.4824 -6.6298 -5.8811 -5.5534 -9.2098 -6.5609 -8.4567 -6.3549 -7.4652 -7.4844 -6.4446 -6.9393 -6.6587 -6.2042 -6.1322 -7.1133 -6.3435 -5.8995

148.5126 147.0937 146.8613 147.0759 137.1646 134.9968 136.7596 136.624 134.8393 135.8088 133.6153 134.4512 133.854 132.7489 132.5844 134.2504 133.0516 133.2031

-7.4128 -5.9939 -5.7615 -5.9761 -8.3612 -6.1934 -7.9562 -7.8206 -7.2963 -7.0054 -6.0723 -6.9082 -6.311 -6.0855 -5.921 -6.7709 -6.3882 -5.7236

EP

135.9789 -7.1755 135.8879 -8.3449 135.8655 -7.0621 135.6649 -8.1854 135.4386 -8.7752 135.3932 -6.5898 56.2356 36.3802 55.0618 37.554 54.2351 38.3807 52.5954 40.0204 53.0544 35.4696 0.9738 18.2112

AC C

C18 C30 C6 C8 C12 C28 C60 C63 C66 C57 C69 R2 RMSE

TE D

Atom

136.77405 -7.97065 136.03205 -8.48905 138.46405 -9.66065 136.53585 -9.05635 135.76485 -9.10145 135.39665 -6.59325 53.28075 39.33505 53.57505 39.04075 53.17835 39.43745 53.10745 39.50835 42.82875 45.69525 0.9767 19.1703

133.4099 -4.6065 132.1976 -4.6546 132.1402 -3.3368 132.498 -5.0185 131.9984 -5.335 132.0163 -3.2129 49.9396 42.6762 49.7576 42.8582 49.9949 42.6209 49.5603 43.0555 41.0164 47.5076 0.9712 19.0788

35

133.1034 -4.3 131.9704 -4.4274 131.4614 -2.658 132.3695 -4.89 131.6502 -4.9868 132.1089 -3.3055 48.552 44.0638 48.3933 44.2225 49.1099 43.5059 48.6937 43.9221 39.0804 49.4436 0.9710 19.5461

δexp 141.0998 141.0998 141.0998 141.0998 128.8034 128.8034 128.8034 128.8034 127.5430 128.8034 127.5430 127.5430 127.5430 126.6634 126.6634 127.4795 126.6634 127.4795 128.8034 127.5430 128.8034 127.4795 126.6634 128.8034 92.6158 92.6158 92.6158 92.6158 88.524

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

B3LYP/6-311G(d,p)

B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)

PBE1PBE/6-311G(d,p)

PBE1PBE/6-311+G(d,p)

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

δcal

δexp-δcal

10.1282 9.9406

12.7125 12.9001

11.1336 10.5737

11.7071 12.267

10.2078 9.9001

12.6329 12.9406

7.9337 7.8582

14.907 14.9825

EP

TE D

δcal

AC C

Atom P1 P2

M AN U

Table 8. Calculated (δcal) and experimental (δexp) 31P chemical shifts of the title compound.

36

δexp 22.8407 22.8407

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

Table 9. Selected the atomic charges of MBDPA calculated by natural population analysis at the B3LYP/6311+ G (d, p)and PBE1PBE/6-311+ G (d, p)level. Atoms B3LYP/6B3LYP/6PBE1PBE/6PBE1PBE/6311g(d,p) 311+g(d,p) 311g(d,p) 311+g(d,p) P1 2.13340 2.20437 1.99511 2.20303 O2 -1.07328 -1.09561 -1.04290 -1.08998 O3 -1.09076 -1.10116 -1.05780 -1.10604 P4 2.13951 2.19839 1.99335 2.19940 N49 -0.98954 -1.00916 -0.95742 -1.00132 N51 -0.99645 -1.01168 -0.96850 -1.02005 N53 -0.98218 -1.00002 -0.95654 -1.00138 N55 -0.99775 -0.99440 -0.95951 -1.00718 C57 -0.17948 -0.19087 -0.21452 -0.21324 C60 -0.19849 -0.20103 -0.23195 -0.23378 C63 -0.17615 -0.18576 -0.20142 -0.20289 C66 -0.17332 -0.20164 -0.20047 -0.20854 C69 -1.08381 -1.13121 -1.05674 -1.17534 Dipole moment 5.589 4.027 6.160 5.1180 (Debye)

37

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT HIGHLIGHTS

 A novel bisphosphoramidate was synthesized and characterized.  Computational studies via B3LYP and PBE1PBE method were used with two different basis sets.

RI PT

 For biological evaluation, Electrophilic and nucleophilic sites are identified.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

 The IC50 value is 5.23nM that was shown strong urease inhibitory activity.