Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands

Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands Elizabeth A Blackburn and Malcolm D Walkinshaw The FK50...

921KB Sizes 0 Downloads 84 Views

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands Elizabeth A Blackburn and Malcolm D Walkinshaw The FK506 binding protein (FKBP) family of proteins provide an interesting series of drug targets since different isoforms modulate diverse cellular pathways. There are therapeutic opportunities in the fields of cancer therapy, neurodegenerative conditions and psychiatric disorders. X-ray crystallographic or NMR data are available for eight of fourteen human FKBPs covering ten of the twenty-two different FKBP domains. We have made a detailed sequence and structural comparison of human FKBP domains. These data show that the chemical scaffolds common to the immunosuppressive inhibitors FK506 and rapamycin bind to the most conserved region of the binding site. This observation opens the way to the design of isoform specific inhibitors. Address The Centre for Translational and Chemical Biology (CTCB), ISMB, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK Corresponding author: Walkinshaw, Malcolm D ([email protected])

Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371 This review comes from a themed issue on Cancer Edited by Maria Fiammetta Romano

1471-4892/$ – see front matter # 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.coph.2011.04.007

Introduction The FK506 binding proteins (FKBPs) form a subset of the immunophilin family that includes the structurally dissimilar cyclophilins [1]. FKBPs are present in almost all tissues, often with high levels of expression [2]. They have regulatory or chaperone function and are characterized by the presence of at least one peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) domain [3]. FKBP12 contains a single PPIase domain, which binds the immunosuppressive drug FK506, and can be considered the archetypal FKBP. In this review, we focus on the 14 human FKBP proteins that exhibit significant sequence identity to FKBP12 (Figure 1). Mammalian FKBPs can be divided into four groups: cytoplasmic, TPR domain, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or secretory pathway and nuclear [4]. The cytoplasmic FKBP isoforms FKBP12 and 12.6 and the nuclear FKBP25 and 133 contain a single PPIase domain. FKBP36, 38, 51 and 52 contain multiple TPR domains. www.sciencedirect.com

The ER FKBPs: FKBP13, 19, 22, 23, 60 and 65 all contain an N-terminal ER signal peptide. The biological roles of the human FKBPs appear to be diverse and frequently involve the domains flanking the PPIase domain [5]. Early interest in the family centred on the ability of FKBP12 to bind the natural product immunosuppressive drugs FK506 and rapamycin [6]. Although these drugs bind to the catalytic site of FKBP12 they do not exert their effect through inhibition of PPIase activity. FKBP12 forms a complex with the drug that facilitates binding of calcineurin (CN) in the case of FK506 and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) with rapamycin. Inhibition of CN or mTOR pathways reduces T cell activation and proliferation [7]. FK506 has also been found to have neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects that do not rely on immunosuppression and is moderated by FKBP12 and 52 [11]. It has proved hard to pin-down which specific isoform is implicated in the action of a given ligand, as multiple FKBPs are often expressed within a cell. A large number of non-immunosuppressive ligands of FKBP12 were discovered between 1995 and 2005. More recently it has been reported that inhibition of FKBP12 and FKBP52 by FK506 reduces the aggregation of alpha-synuclein and cell death in a model of Parkinson’s disease [12].

The human genome has 22 PPIase domains in 14 proteins Structural data and predictions from sequence strongly suggest that the 22 human PPIase domains maintain a similar fold. Amino acid sequences were aligned to examine residue conservation within the domain (Figures 2 and 3(a)). PPIase domain identity with FKBP12 is within the range of 17–83%. These data show the N-terminal domain of a protein containing multiple PPIase domains is always the most similar to FKBP12 (Figure 1(b), full alignment data is shown in Supplementary Table 2). The cytoplasmic FKBP isoforms 12 and 12.6 show very close identity (83%). The secretory pathway FKBPs fall into a single cluster (Figure 1(b)). The proteins FKBP60 and 65 contain four PPIase domains and there is a correlation between identity and the position of the domain in the chain. For example, FKBP60_FK1 is nearest neighbour to FKBP65_FK1. The TPR FKBPs show greater complexity. The FKBP51 and 52 N-terminal PPIase domains have 51 and 53% identity to FKBP12. However, FKBP51_FK2 and FKBP52_FK2 show greater similarity to FKBP38 than their respective FK1 domains. Biochemical data support this observation in that FKBP52_FK1 provides the majority of the PPIase activity of FKBP52 [15]. The nuclear FKBPs 25 and 133 Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371

366 Cancer

Figure 1

(a)

1 20

FKBP12.6

(b)

108

FKBP12

2ppn

52_FK2 51_FK2 38 36 133 65_FK4 60_FK4 65_FK3 60_FK3 65_FK2 60_FK2 65_FK1 60_FK1 19 23 22 13 25 52_FK1 51_FK1 12.6 12

108

1 20

1c9h 1

54

143

FKBP36

327

1b7x 1

120

FKBP38

204

412

2awg 1

42

130 157

FKBP51

243

1

50

138 167

FKBP52

253

1

49

459

1qlc

1qlc

FKBP13

457

1kto

1kto

142

2pbc 1

57

144

201

FKBP19 1

45

135

211

FKBP22 1

53

1

54

145

222

FKBP23 142 166

254 278

365 389

477

570

FKBP60

4 1

62

150

174

262 286

374 399

486

20

36

52

68

84

100

582

FKBP65

Pairwise alignment score (Clustalw) 1

FKBP25

128

224

1pbk 1

197

290

1219

FKBP133

PPIase domain

TPR domain

ER signal peptide

ER retention sequence

EF-handmotif

Ca2+ binding Current Opinion in Pharmacology

The domain structure of the human FKBPs. (a) The domain structure of the 14 human FKBPs retrieved from a BLAST search of sequences from The Reference Sequence collection, using E-value cut-off of less than 1  106 against human FKBP12 [8,9]. Human PPIase domains with crystallographic data deposited in the PDB are annotated with a blue star and the PDB accession code of a representative structure. (b) Dendrogram showing sequence identity of the human PPIase domains (UPGMA clustering of the ClustalW pairwise alignment scores from sequences in Figure 2 [10]). Multiple PPIase domains are labelled sequentially from N-terminus (FK1) to C-terminus (FKn).

show relatively low identity (36%). FKBP25 is closest to FKBP12, 12.6 and the N-terminal domains of 51 and 52. FKBP133 is a near neighbour of FKBP13 (40%), a member of the ER FKBPs.

Binding-pocket differences: the possibility of designing domain-specific ligands Figure 3(a) illustrates the differences in amino acids forming the FKBP binding site. A red surface denotes highly conserved amino acids. The floor of the PPIase binding site is formed by tryptophan in FKBP12 (Figure 3(b)) and 16 X-ray/NMR structures of FKBP12 in complex with 12 different small-molecule inhibitors all show the ligand making hydrophobic contacts with Trp59 of FKBP12 Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371

(see Figure 2 for numbering scheme and Supplementary Table 3 for PDB ID). Interestingly Trp59 is not particularly well conserved and is frequently replaced by an alternative hydrophobic residue, most commonly methionine (Figure 2). There is a strong preference for methionine in the ER FKBPs. The most conserved residues form a crescent that makes hydrophobic contacts with the most buried portion of FK506 and rapamycin; these include Tyr26, Phe 46 and Phe99 (Figures 2 and 3(c)). Asp37 is well conserved, as are Ile56 and Tyr82; these residues make hydrogen bonding interactions with FK506 and rapamycin (Figure 2). The exposed loop formed by His87 to Ile91 in FKBP12 is www.sciencedirect.com

Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands Blackburn and Walkinshaw 367

Figure 2

FKBP12 numbering

Y26

D37

F46

E54

I56 W59

FKBP12 FKBP12.6

GQTCVVHYTGMLE----DGKK-FDS-----SRDRN--KPFKFMLGKQE---VIRGWEEGVAQMSVGQRAKLTIS GQTCVVHYTGMLQ----NGKK-FDS-----SRDRN--KPFKFRIGKQE---VIKGFEEGAAQMSLGQRAKLTCT

FKBP36 FKBP38 FKBP51_FK1 FKBP51_FK2 FKBP52_FK1 FKBP52_FK2

DASVLVKYSGYLE----HMDRPFDS-----NYFRK--TPRLMKLGEDI---TLWGMELGLLSMRRGELARFLFK GQVVTVHLQTSLE----NGTR-VQEE-----------PELVFTLGDCD---VIQALDLSVPLMDVGETAMVTAD GDKVYVHYKGKLS----NGKK-FDS-----SHDRN--EPFVFSLGKGQ---VIKAWDIGVATMKKGEICHLLCK GATVEIHLEGRCG-----GRM-FDC------------RDVAFTVGEGEDHDIPIGIDKALEKMQREEQCILYLG GDRVFVHYTGWLL----DGTK-FDS-----SLDRK--DKFSFDLGKGE---VIKAWDIAIATMKVGEVCHITCK GAIVEVALEGYYK-----DKL-FDQ------------RELRFEIGEGENLDLPYGLERAIQRMEKGEHSIVYLK

FKBP13 FKBP19 FKBP22 FKBP23 FKBP60_FK1 FKBP60_FK2 FKBP60_FK3 FKBP60_FK4 FKBP65_FK1 FKBP65_FK2 FKBP65_FK3 FKBP65_FK4

GDVLHMHYTGKLE----DGTE-FDS-----SLPQN--QPFVFSLGTGQ---VIKGWDQGLLGMCEGEKRKLVIP GDTLHIHYTGSLV----DGRI-IDT-----SLTR---DPLVIELGQKQ---VIPGLEQSLLDMCVGEKRRAIIP GDLMLVHYEGYLEK---DGSL-FHS-----THKHNNGQPIWFTLGILE---ALKGWDQGLKGMCVGEKRKLIIP GDLLNAHYDGYLAK---DGSK-FYC-----SRTQNEGHPKWFVLGVGQ---VIKGLDIAMTDMCPGEKRKVVIP GDFVRYHYVGTFP----DGQK-FDS-----SYDRD--STFNVFVGKGQ---LITGMDQALVGMCVNERRFVKIP SDFVRYHYNGTFL----DGTL-FDS-----SHNRM--KTYDTYVGIGW---LIPGMDKGLLGMCVGEKRIITIP GDFLRYHYNGTLL----DGTL-FDS-----SYSRN--RTFDTYIGQGY---VIPGMDEGLLGVCIGEKRRIVVP GDYLKYHYNASLL----DGTL-LDS-----TWNLG--KTYNIVLGSGQ---VVLGMDMGLREMCVGEKRTVIIP GDFVRYHYNGTFE----DGKK-FDS-----SYDRN--TLVAIVVGVGR---LITGMDRGLMGMCVNERRRLIVP GDFVRYHYNGTLL----DGTS-FDT-----SYSKG--GTYDTYVGSGW---LIKGMDQGLLGMCPGERRKIIIP GDFMRYHYNGSLM----DGTL-FDS-----SYSRN--HTYNTYIGQGY---IIPGMDQGLQGACMGERRRITIP GDFVRYHYNCSLL----DGTQ-LFT-----SHDYG--APQEATLGANK---VIEGLDTGLQGMCVGERRQLIVP

FKBP25 FKBP133

GDVVHCWYTGTLQ----DGTV-FDTNIQTSAKKKKNAKPLSFKVGVGK---VIRGWDEALLTMSKGEKARLEIE GDSLEVAYTGWLFQNHVLGQV-FDS-----TANKD--KLLRLKLGSGK---VIKGWEDGMLGMKKGGKRLLIVP

FKBP12 numbering

Y82

H87

I91

F99

FKBP12 FKBP12.6

PDYAYGATG-HPGIIPPHATLVFDVELLKLE PDVAYGATG-HPGVIPPNATLIFDVELLNLE

FKBP36 FKBP38 FKBP51_FK1 FKBP51_FK2 FKBP52_FK1 FKBP52_FK2

PNYAYGTLG-CPPLIPPNTTVLFEIELLDFL SKYCYGPQGRSPY-IPPHAALCLEVTLKTAV PEYAYGSAG-SLPKIPSNATLFFEIELLDFK PRYGFGEAGKPKFGIEPNAELIYEVTLKSFE PEYAYGSAG-SPPKIPPNATLVFEVELFEFK PSYAFGSVGKEKFQIPPNAELKYELHLKSFE

FKBP13 FKBP19 FKBP22 FKBP23 FKBP60_FK1 FKBP60_FK2 FKBP60_FK3 FKBP60_FK4 FKBP65_FK1 FKBP65_FK2 FKBP65_FK3 FKBP65_FK4

SELGYGERG-APPKIPGGATLVFEVELLKIE SHLAYGKRG-FPPSVPADAVVQYDVELIALI PALGYGKEG--KGKIPPESTLIFNIDLLEIR PSFAYGKEGYAEGKIPPDATLIFEIELYAVT PKLAYGNEG-VSGVIPPNSVLHFDVLLMDIW PFLAYGEDG-DGKDIPGQASLVFDVALLDLH PHLGYGEEG-RGN-IPGSAVLVFDIHVIDFH PHLGYGEAG-VDGEVPGSAVLVFDIELLELV PHLGYGSIG-LAGLIPPDATLYFDVVLLDVW PFLAYGEKG-YGTVIPPQASLVFHVLLIDVH PHLAYGENG-TGDKIPGSAVLIFNVHVIDFH PHLAHGESG-ARG-VPGSAVLLFEVELVSRE

FKBP25 FKBP133

PEWAYGKKGQPDAKIPPNAKLTFEVELVDID PACAVGSEGVIGWTQATDSILVFEVEVRRVK Current Opinion in Pharmacology

Amino acid sequences of human PPIase domains. PPIase domains from the 14 human FKBPs were aligned with FKBP12 [9] (red box). The hydrophobic amino acids forming the base of the PPIase domain are labelled with a grey background and those forming hydrogen bonds between FKBP12 and FK506 with black backgrounds. Key residues of FKBP12 have a numerical label (crystallographic numbering convention, 2ppn.pdb). The secondary structure of FKBP12, from crystallographic data, is shown above the sequences [13]. b-Sheet is denoted by blue boxes and a-helices by red cylinders. Protein sequences retrieved from the UniProtKB database [14].

www.sciencedirect.com

Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371

368 Cancer

Figure 3

Residue conservation

(a)

FKBP12

(b)

(c)

FKBP12_rapamycin

I91 Y82

F36 H87 D37 F99

I56

W59

Y26 F46

E54 F48 Q53

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Current Opinion in Pharmacology

(a) The 22 FKBP domains show remarkable diversity in the catalytic site. Surface representation of FKBP12, 2DG3.pdb was coloured according to sequence conservation, ranging from white (variable residues) through yellow and orange to red (conserved residues). Sequence conservation was calculated from the alignment of the 22 domains in Figures 1 and 2 [16]. (b) FKBP12 represented as secondary structure elements. Amino acids making key interactions with FK506 and rapamycin are highlighted as sticks [2]. (c) Electrostatic surface representations of FKBP12, 2DG3.pdb Red areas show negative charge, blue positive charge and white hydrophobic surface (PyMOL). Rapamycin is shown in black sticks.

poorly conserved (Figure 3(b)). Ile91 is replaced by lysine in many FKBPs, for example, FKBP51. The solvent exposed moiety of FK506 and rapamycin make contacts with an acidic patch on FKBP12. This surface region shows considerable variation in charge between different PPIase domains (see Figure 3(c) and Supplementary Figure 1). Exploiting these differences is likely to be central to targeting specific FKBPs.

Small-molecules inhibitors of FKBP12 based on the FK506/rapamycin scaffold Small-molecule inhibitors of FKBP12 have been reviewed in some detail by Babine et al., Dornan et al. and Wang et al. [17–19]. Many synthetic ligands have been based on the chemically similar FKBP12 binding domains of FK506 and rapamycin; many are potent isomerase inhibitors with Ki values for FKBP12 in the low nanomolar range. Acyclic ligands have been developed by replacing the non-FKBP binding loop with a variety of aliphatic chains, rings and aromatic groups. Figure 4 illustrates the main scaffolds; a more comprehensive list is available in Supplementary Table 4. A pharmacophore binding model has been developed [20] that provides flexibility between a five and six member ring and emphasizes the importance of the a-keto amide functionality (highlighted in Figure 4). Key groups within the FKBP12 binding domain of FK506 have also been substituted with bioisosteres. Table 4 of the Supplementary Material illustrates a compound (M4 core) where the aketo amide linker is replaced with a sulphonamide [21]. Pfizer have developed a reaction scheme for synthesizing a sulfamide linker to replace the metabolically unstable Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371

ketoamide in neuroimmunophilin ligands [22]. GPI-1046 (Guilford Pharmaceuticals and Amgen) and V10367 (Vertex Pharmaceuticals) are examples of compounds that exhibit neurotrophic action in both animal models and in the clinic (Figure 4). These compounds do not show immunosuppressive effects.

Screening strategies for discovering novel molecular inhibitors The recent literature cites new assays to detect FKBP inhibitors; however, relatively few new compounds have been reported. One assay has been developed where the increased stability of FKBP in complex with a smallmolecule ligand is detected by unfolding with chemical denaturants [23,24]. Another method describes how changes to the charge-state distribution of a protein in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry can provide an estimate the affinity of a complex [25]. Juli et al. performed an NMR screen for small-molecule inhibitors of the legionella MIP protein that is similar to FKBP12 [26]. The authors report affinity data for a series of N-sulfonyl pipecolyl amides binding to FKBP12. These compounds have similar structures to previously reported compounds [27–30] (see Supplementary Table 4).

Investigating specificity for protein substrates FKBPs have greater sequence specificity for peptide substrates than the cyclophilins showing higher activity towards substrates with a hydrophobic amino acid in the position preceding proline [35,36,37]. The groups of Fischer and Schmid have developed a library of fluorescent peptides to examine the substrate specificity of prolyl www.sciencedirect.com

Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands Blackburn and Walkinshaw 369

Figure 4 Me

Me

Me H

Me

O

OMe

O

O

OH

Me

OH O

OMe H

N

O

Me H OH

O

O

N

Me

Me

N

O N(Me)2

OMe

O

O

O

Me O

O

HN

O O

HO

O

O

OH

O FK506

Compound 1

DM-CHX

OH CI

N O

O O

O O

N

O

O

N

N

O

N

O

O

O

O

OMe

N OMe

GPI-1046

FKBP PPIase FK506 Rapamycin GPI-1046 DM-CHX

Compound 3

Compound 2

12

12.6

YES 0.2 0.75 306 29500

YES 4.4 0.8 392 21400

38 with calcineurin n.d. 499 48 85

Ki (nM) 51 YES 104 14.7 447 155000

52

13

25

YES 23 6.12 936 259000

YES 166 1.14 290 29500

YES n.d. 0.9 631 169

Reference

[31] [32] [32] [32]

Current Opinion in Pharmacology

Structures of selected compounds with nanomolar affinity for FKBP; these are representative of the key inhibitor scaffolds [6,21,31,32–34]. The a-keto amide functionality of FK506 is emphasized by the shaded region. A more complete selection of inhibitors is shown in Supplementary Table 4. The inset table shows a compilation of affinity data from Edlich et al. [32] and Kozany et al. [31]. The data illustrates the specificity of certain inhibitors for different family members. n.d. not determined.

isomerases [36]. Sensitive monitoring of PPIase activity is achieved by labelling the peptides with fluorescent groups at the N-terminus and C-terminus. Fluorescent quenching is dependent on cis–trans geometry. This assay has the advantage over the traditional PPIase assay, as isomerisation is not coupled to proteolysis by a-chymotrypsin [38]. Another interesting high-throughput PPIase assay has been developed where 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin is conjugated to a tetrapeptide substrate rather than p-nitroaniline [39,40]. This assay has the advantage of being performed at room temperature.

Structure-based drug discovery using FKBP12 as a template Over 20 NMR or X-ray structures are available for FKBP12 free and in complex with small molecules (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 3) [18]. These structures have www.sciencedirect.com

provided templates for structure-based drug design. An NMR fragment-linking approach was an early example of designing ligands with nanomolar affinity from lower affinity fragments binding to specific sites on the protein [41]. A more recent high-throughput NMR study by Stebbins et al. identified various fragment-like micromolar affinity ligands with novel scaffolds [42]. NMR has the advantage of highlighting amino acids that form important interactions at the binding interface and confirms binding at the PPIase active site. Structural data were utilised by Rohrig et al., to improve the potency of a known fragment-like inhibitor by changing the link to a second-fragment in the binding groove bounded by Gln53 and Glu54 (Figure 3(b)) [43]. High-resolution X-ray structures of FKBP12 have been used in virtual screening to discover chemical scaffolds that differ from the FK506 binding moiety (Supplementary Table 4) [27,44,30]. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371

370 Cancer

FKBP specificity for inhibitors

Appendix A. Supplementary data

FK506 and rapamycin show affinity in the high picomolar to high nanomolar range for the majority of PPIase domains [20,31,32]. The inset table in Figure 4 shows a compilation of selected affinity data from Edlich et al. [32] and Kozany et al. [31]. Kozany et al. have developed a series of labelled probes for use in a fluorescence polarisation assay. The equilibrium dissociation constant for fluorescently labelled rapamycin and two small-molecule analogues of the FKBP12 binding domain of FK506/rapamycin were determined for a range of FKBPs (compound (1) Figure 4). These data can be used in competition assays to measure ligand affinity with some precision.

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.coph.2011. 04.007.

Rather surprisingly, FKBP38 and FKBP13 show a marked preference for rapamycin over FK506. FKBP38 is interesting as it has a much deeper and narrower active site than FKBP12 (Supplemental Figure 1(f)). In the PPIase domain of FKBP38, Trp59 is replaced with Leu, Phe36 with Val and His87 with Arg (Figure 2). Many of the aromatic hydrophobic residues lining the domain in FKBP12 are replaced with Leu in FKBP38. FKBP38 only binds FK506 in the presence of calmodulin and Ca2+ because of a proposed allosteric rearrangement. Rapamycin shows a 500-fold lower affinity for FKBP38 than FKBP12. In contrast, compounds GPI-1046 and DM-CHX show much higher affinity for FKBP38. Compound DM-CHX also shows a preference for FKBP25 which has been shown to be regulator of the p53 pathway. FKBP51 and 52 have received attention as anti-tumour targets [45]; they have high overall sequence homology but still show some specificity for ligands. The N-terminal PPIase domains of FKBP51 and 52 have 70% sequence identity but despite their high similarity, FKBP51 has a two-fold higher affinity for GPI-1046 and FKBP52 a twofold higher affinity for Compound (1) (Figure 4).

Conclusions Designing small-molecule ligands with specificity between different FKBPs is still in its infancy. The structural data show that FK506 and rapamycin, and their close analogues, all bind in a mode where the common motif makes non-covalent interactions with the most highly conserved residues in the PPIase domain. This means that scaffolds based on FK506 and rapamycin are likely to hit multiple FKBP targets and make it difficult to tease out which cellular pathway the drug is targeting. Compounds GPI-1046 and DM-CHX show that achieving specificity is possible for FKBP38. However, FKBP38 only shows identity to other FKBPs of between 10 and 37%. Even after many years of interest in FKBPs there is still a requirement for novel drug scaffolds. There is also a lack of structural and biochemical data for the ER FKBPs. The biggest advances in recent years have been in the development of fluorescent probes to examine ligand specificity. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371

References and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:  of special interest  of outstanding interest 1.

Somarelli JA, Lee SY, Skolnick J, Herrera RJ: Structure-based classification of 45 FK506-binding proteins. Proteins 2008, 72:197-208.

2.

Galat A: Functional drift of sequence attributes in the FK506binding proteins (FKBPs). J Chem Inf Model 2008, 48:1118-1130.

3.

Ivery MT: Immunophilins: switched on protein binding domains? Med Res Rev 2000, 20:452-484.

4.

Himukai R, Kuzuhara T, Horikoshi M: Relationship between the subcellular localization and structures of catalytic domains of FKBP-type PPIases. J Biochem 1999, 126:879-888.

5.

Kang CB, Hong Y, Dhe-Paganon S, Yoon HS: FKBP family proteins: immunophilins with versatile biological functions. Neurosignals 2008, 16:318-325.

6.

Bierer BE, Mattila PS, Standaert RF, Herzenberg LA, Burakhoff SJ, Crabtree G, Schreiber SL: Two distinct signal transmission pathways in T lymphocytes are inhibited by complexes formed between an immunophilin and either FK506 or rapamycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1990, 87:9231-9235.

7.

Driggers EM, Hale SP, Lee J, Terrett NK: The exploration of macrocycles for drug discovery — an underexploited structural class. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008, 7:608-624.

8.

Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:3389-3402.

9.

Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR: NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:D61-D65.

10. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R et al.: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2947-2948. 11. Gold BG: Neuroimmunophilin ligands: evaluation of their therapeutic potential for the treatment of neurological disorders. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2000, 9:2331-2342. 12. Gerard M, Deleersnijder A, Daniels V, Schreurs S, Munck S, Reumers V, Pottel H, Engelborghs Y, Van den Haute C, Taymans JM et al.: Inhibition of FK506 binding proteins reduces alpha-synuclein aggregation and Parkinson’s disease-like pathology. J Neurosci 2010, 30:2454-2463. 13. Szep S, Park S, Boder ET, Van Duyne GD, Saven JG: Structural  coupling between FKBP12 and buried water. Proteins 2009, 74:603-611. A very high resolution structure of uncomplexed FKBP12 (0.9 A˚) showing the position of key water molecules in the active site. Replacing these water molecules with a ligand makes a favourable thermodynamic contribution to binding. 14. Magrane M, Consortium U: UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database (Oxford) 2011, 2011:bar009. 15. Peattie DA, Harding MW, Fleming MA, DeCenzo MT, Lippke JA, Livingston DJ, Benasutti M: Expression and characterization of human FKBP52, an immunophilin that associates with the 90-kDa heat shock protein and is a component of steroid receptor complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992, 89:10974-10978. www.sciencedirect.com

Targeting FKBP isoforms with small-molecule ligands Blackburn and Walkinshaw 371

16. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N: ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:W529-W533. 17. Babine RE, Bender SL: Molecular recognition of protein–ligand complexes: applications to drug design. Chem Rev 1997, 97:1359-1472. 18. Dornan J, Taylor P, Walkinshaw MD: Structures of immunophilins and their ligand complexes. Curr Top Med Chem 2003, 3:1392-1409. 19. Wang XJ, Etzkorn FA: Peptidyl-prolyl isomerase inhibitors. Biopolymers 2006, 84:125-146. 20. Christner C, Herdegen T, Fischer G: FKBP ligands as novel therapeutics for neurological disorders. Mini Rev Med Chem 2001, 1:377-397. 21. Choi C, Li JH, Vaal M, Thomas C, Limburg D, Wu YQ, Chen Y, Soni R, Scott C, Ross DT et al.: Use of parallel-synthesis combinatorial libraries for rapid identification of potent FKBP12 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2002, 12:1421-1428. 22. Guo C, Dong L, Kephart S, Hou X: An efficient synthesis of sulfamides. Tetrahedron Lett 2010, 51:2909-2913. 23. Mahendrarajah K, Dalby PA, Wilkinson B, Jackson SE, Main ER: A  high-throughput fluorescence chemical denaturation assay as a general screen for protein-ligand binding. Anal Biochem 2011, 411:155-157. A useful alternative to the PPIase assay, that is applicable to all FKBP binding sites not only the catalytic domain. This assay exploits the thermodynamic coupling between ligand binding and protein stability. 24. Gaudet M, Remtulla N, Jackson SE, Main ER, Bracewell DG, Aeppli G, Dalby PA: Protein denaturation and protein:drugs interactions from intrinsic protein fluorescence measurements at the nanolitre scale. Protein Sci 2010, 19:1544-1554. 25. Blackburn EA, Maclean JK, Sherborne BS, Walkinshaw MD: Estimating the affinity of protein–ligand complex from changes to the charge-state distribution of a protein in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 403:190-193. 26. Juli C, Sippel M, Jager J, Thiele A, Weiwad M, Schweimer K, Rosch P, Steinert M, Sotriffer CA, Holzgrabe U: Pipecolic acid derivatives as small-molecule inhibitors of the legionella MIP protein. J Med Chem 2011, 54:277-283. 27. Sun F, Li P, Ding Y, Wang L, Bartlam M, Shu C, Shen B, Jiang H, Li S, Rao Z: Design and structure-based study of new potential FKBP12 inhibitors. Biophys J 2003, 85:3194-3201. 28. Wei L, Wu Y, Wilkinson DE, Chen Y, Soni R, Scott C, Ross DT, Guo H, Howorth P, Valentine H et al.: Solid-phase synthesis of FKBP12 inhibitors: N-sulfonyl and N-carbamoylprolyl/ pipecolyl amides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2002, 12:1429-1433. 29. Holt DA, Luengo JI, Yamashita DS, Oh HJ, Konialian AL, Yen HK, Rozamus LW, Brandt M, Bossard MJ: Design, synthesis, and kinetic evaluation of high-affinity FKBP ligands and the X-ray crystal structures of their complexes with FKBP12. J Am Chem Soc 1993, 115:9925-9938. 30. Li P, Wang L, Ding Y, Wu B, Shu C, Nie A, Li S, Shen B, Rao Z: Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of FKBP12 complexed with a novel neurotrophic ligand. Protein Pept Lett 2002, 9:459-463. 31. Kozany C, Marz A, Kress C, Hausch F: Fluorescent probes to  characterise FK506-binding proteins. Chembiochem 2009, 10:1402-1410. Fluorescent probes are described that may be used in sensitive fluorescence polarization assays to determine ligand affinity. This work

www.sciencedirect.com

describes the specificity of FK506, rapamycin and a series of smallmolecule ligands for different FKBP isoforms. 32. Edlich F, Weiwad M, Wildemann D, Jarczowski F, Kilka S, Moutty MC, Jahreis G, Lucke C, Schmidt W, Striggow F, Fischer G: The specific FKBP38 inhibitor N-(N0 ,N0 dimethylcarboxamidomethyl)cycloheximide has potent neuroprotective and neurotrophic properties in brain ischemia. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:14961-14970. 33. Sich C, Improta S, Cowley DJ, Guenet C, Merly JP, Teufel M, Saudek V: Solution structure of a neurotrophic ligand bound to FKBP12 and its effects on protein dynamics. Eur J Biochem 2000, 267:5342-5355. 34. Hudack RA Jr, Barta NS, Guo C, Deal J, Dong L, Fay LK, Caprathe B, Chatterjee A, Vanderpool D, Bigge C et al.: Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel polycyclic aza-amide FKBP12 ligands. J Med Chem 2006, 49:1202-1206. 35. Fanghanel J, Fischer G: Insights into the catalytic mechanism of peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerases. Front Biosci 2004, 9:3453-3478. 36. Zoldak G, Aumuller T, Lucke C, Hritz J, Oostenbrink C, Fischer G,  Schmid FX: A library of fluorescent peptides for exploring the substrate specificities of prolyl isomerases. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2009, 48:10423-10436. A series of fluorescent peptides that may be used in competition assays for discovering new FKBP inhibitors and in understanding substrate specificities of different FKBP family members. 37. Harrison RK, Stein RL: Substrate specificities of the peptidyl prolyl cis–trans isomerase activities of cyclophilin and FK-506 binding protein: evidence for the existence of a family of distinct enzymes. Biochemistry (Mosc) 1990, 29:3813-3816. 38. Kofron JL, Kuzmic P, Kishore V, Colon-Bonilla E, Rich DH: Determination of kinetic constants for peptidyl prolyl cis–trans isomerases by an improved spectrophotometric assay. Biochemistry (Mosc) 1991, 30:6127-6134. 39. Mori T, Itami S, Yanagi T, Tatara Y, Takamiya M, Uchida T: Use of a  real-time fluorescence monitoring system for highthroughput screening for prolyl isomerase inhibitors. J Biomol Screen 2009, 14:419-424. An adaption of Kofron’s PPIase assay. 7-Amino-4-methylcoumarin conjugated to tetrapeptide substrate rather than p-nitroaniline. This has the advantage of a HTS format and may be performed at room temperature. 40. Mori T, Hidaka M, Lin YC, Yoshizawa I, Okabe T, Egashira S, Kojima H, Nagano T, Koketsu M, Takamiya M, Uchida T: A dual inhibitor against prolyl isomerase Pin1 and cyclophilin discovered by a novel real-time fluorescence detection method. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011, 406:439-443. 41. Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, Meadows RP, Fesik SW: Discovering high-affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR. Science 1996, 274:1531-1534. 42. Stebbins JL, Zhang Z, Chen J, Wu B, Emdadi A, Williams ME, Cashman J, Pellecchia M: Nuclear magnetic resonance fragment-based identification of novel FKBP12 inhibitors. J Med Chem 2007, 50:6607-6617. 43. Rohrig CH, Loch C, Guan JY, Siegal G, Overhand M: Fragmentbased synthesis and SAR of modified FKBP ligands: influence of different linking on binding affinity. ChemMedChem 2007, 2:1054-1070. 44. Burkhard P, Hommel U, Sanner M, Walkinshaw MD: The discovery of steroids and other novel FKBP inhibitors using a molecular docking program. J Mol Biol 1999, 287:853-858. 45. Romano S, Di PA, Sorrentino A, Bisogni R, Sivero L, Romano MF: FK506 binding proteins as targets in anticancer therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2010, 10:651-656.

Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2011, 11:365–371