Journal of Luminescence 40&41 (1988) 463—464 North-Holland, Amsterdam
463
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF THE BOUND POLARON IN A POLAR CRYSTAL SLAB
*
Jinying SUN
Institute of solid state Physics, Neimenggu University, Huhehaote, Neimenggu,P.R.C. Shiwel liii
Department of Applied Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai,
P.R.C.
In considering both the electron interaction with the bulk longitudinal optical (La) phonon and the electron interaction with the surface optical (SO) phonon,we have obtained the temperature dependence of the ground state and the excited state energy and the effective mass of the bound polaron confined in a slab of polar
crystal by using Lee-Low-Pines variational technique and perturbative variational method.
zI~d
1. INTRODUCTION
thickness 2d occupying the space of
In the past, most work on polaron has been devoted to the calculation for the
and the space for zl>d is a vacuum, the potential is zero inside the slab and
temperature dependence of the energy and 1 ,2 in a three—dimen— the effective mass sional polar crystal, but no one has considerea the similar problem in a p0—
infinite outside the slab. In the fol— lowing, we limit ourselves to the region
IzI~dand assume that the donor is lo—
lar crystal slab taking into account the
Hasniltonian of the system can be written
electron-SO phonon interaction, In this paper, in considering both the
as HHe+Hph+HeLO+He_SO
electron—La phonon and the electron-SO phonon interaction,we have obtained the tern-
The last two term in (1) are the Ham— iltonian operatures for the electron-LO
perature dependence of both the ground state and the excited state energy of
(SO) phonon interaction taken from Pef.3~. Following the LLP method, after some
the bound polaron confined in a slab of
lengthy calculations,we obtain finally
cated at the center of the slab. The
2
~
lEi
2
polar crystal by using Lee-Low-Pinces variational technique and perturbative
~
variational method . We have also obtained the temperature dependence of the effective mass of the bound polaron in the
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
slab.
*This
/
2
e ~~)+vB+VS
(2) e At last, we get the energy of the system.
We have done numerical computation for the weak coupling polar crystal InAs and have shown some results in Fig.1
2. THE HAMILTONIAN Consider
h
d
(1)
a polar crystal slab with
work was supported
by the
Science
0022—2313/88/$03.50 © Elsevier Science Publishers BY. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division)
Foundation
of the Chinese
Academy of Sciences.
464
J. Sun, S. Gu
/
Temperature dependence of the bound polaron
________________________
0 0,0 ~
0.5
z/d
N= 30 VB~ T=200K
-1.0.
vB(vS)/aL~O
0,4
\\
0.2
1(a)
0.
FB+FS
0 O
10
20
e
/
the
,‘T~UQK ~ Zzrd/2
,,‘
V~—.-~
vB(vs)/thHO~L,o 200
600
effective
potentials
decrease
with
trend 15 consistent with the temperature behavior of the induced polarization 4. charge density For low temperatures, the ‘effective
1(b)
600 T(K)
400
I.
increasing temperature (Fig. 1(c)). This
—
0.0 0
a
400
FIG.2. The temperature dependence of in m*=m*rl÷a(FB+FS)]. effective mass factor (FB+FS) appearing
/ /
a
200
mass’ of electron in the x,yin plane rnincrease with motion T. As explained
~-
Pef.5 this increase can be attributed to
:—
the nonparabolicity of the polaron conduction band. At a higher temperature,
~
the uncorrelated motion of the phonons becomes
-0.8
an important
interaction FIG.1. The effective potential VB,VS vs. (a)tkse position of the electron z; (b)the number of InAs monolayers N; (c)the temperature T.
results
becomes
Fig.1(a),1(b) effective contributed
by the
non interaction
perature
and 1(c)
potential
results
electron—LO
(SO) pho-
is nOt related to the also
and the slab
relates
of the system.
It
to is
the
effective,which
of m~ (Fig.2).
REFERENCES and C,Podrigueg, 110 (1982) 105.
Phys.
the
VB(z,d,T)(VS(z,d,T))
of the electron but
showed that
less
in a decrease
1.V.K.Fedyanin Stat.Sol.(b)
thickness,
It
in a decrease of the coherence between the electron motion and the motion of’ the phonon, i.e., the electron—phonon
1(c)
position
factor.
z=d/2
tern—
shown that
2.
F.M.Peeters B31 (1985)
and J.T.Devrees, 1+890.
3.
J,J.Licari and R.Evrard, (1977) 2251+
1+. F.M.Peeters
Phys.Rev.
Phys.Pev.B15
and J.T.Devrees, Stat.Sol.(b)115 (1983) 285,
5.
Y.Osaka,J.Phys.Soc.Jap.21
Phys.
(1966) 1+23.