The activity and state of the copper surface in methanol synthesis catalysts

The activity and state of the copper surface in methanol synthesis catalysts

Applied Catalysis, 25 (1986) 101-107 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands 101 THE ACTIVITY AND STATE OF THE COPP...

341KB Sizes 23 Downloads 28 Views

Applied Catalysis, 25 (1986) 101-107 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands

101

THE ACTIVITY AND STATE OF THE COPPER SURFACE IN METHANOL SYNTHESIS CATALYSTS G.C. CHINCHEN', K.C. WAUGH2 and D.A. WHAN' ‘Imperial

Chemical

Industries, plc, Agricultural Division, Billingham, Cleveland,

TS23 lLB, U.K. 2 Imperial Chemical Industries, plc, New Science Group, Runcorn Heath, Cheshire, WA7 4QE, U.K.

ABSTRACT The measurement of copper metal surface areas by monitoring nitrous oxide chemisorotion is a well established technique. A frontal chromatographic version of this technique has been developed which is very suitable for in situ measurements and this has enabled the apparent copper areas of various catalysts to be measured after exposures to methanol synthesis gases of different compositions at typical industrial conditions in microreactors cormnonlyused for assessing the methanol synthesis activity of such catalysts. Using such techniques, it has been shown that, first, there is a linear relationship between the methanol synthesis activity of copper/zinc oxide/alumina catalysts and their total copper surface area. Second, that copper supported on other materials has approximately the same turnover number as copper/zinc oxide/alumina catalysts. Third, that under industrial conditions the copper Surface of the catalyst is partially oxidised, to an extent which depends on the composition of the synthesis gas, particularly the CO2/CO ratio. INTRODUCTION Industrial methanol synthesis catalysts are generally based on CuO/ZnO/A1203 or CuO/ZnO/Cr203 compositions and, whilst the process operating at TO - 100 bar

- _

pressure and in the temperature range 230 - 300°C is well established, many aspects of the mechanism of synthesis are still not fully understood and are the subject of continued debate. In particular there is still controversy as to the exact nature of the active centre and more specifically about the chemical state of the individual components of the catalyst, especially the copper under typical methanol synthesis conditions. Under industrial conditions (50 bar, 250°C) using methanol synthesis feeds containing both CO and CO2 over a Cu/ZnO/A1203 catalyst several workers Cl,23 have shown by using labelled carbon oxides that all of methanol is formed from the CO2 component of the feed rather than the CO. The major reaction involved is therefore CO2 + 2H2

+

CH30H + O(s)

0166-9834/86/$03.50

8

1966 Elaevier Science Publishen B.V.

(0

102 where O(s) is a surface

oxygen

atom,

and it is likely

that a role of the CO and H, L

is to scavenge

this surface

oxygen,

by reactions

such as

co + O(s)

+

co*

(2)

H2 + O(s)

+

H20

(3)

The oxidation

state of the catalyst

be controlled

by the relative

believe diagram copper

that the detailed in Figure surface

to an extent

surface

during

rates of reactions

mechanism

be covered

determined

with formate,

by the kinetics

synthesis

(I), (2) and

of methanol

synthesis

1 [3], and it is a consequence

will

methanol

(3). We further

is represented

of this mechanism

formyl,

and relative

will then

methoxy

by the

that the

species

and oxygen

rates of the various

reaction

steps.

FIGURE

1 Mechanism

of methanol

synthesis

on a Cu/ZnO/A1203

catalyst

from a CO,

C02, H2 feed.

The present

work

area and methanol to examine by oxides copper

sets out

synthesis

(i) to examine activity

the same relationship other

component

gas compositions.

than zinc oxide, of these

the relationship

in a series

for catalysts

of Cu/ZnO/A1203

in which

and (iii) to assess

catalysts

at steady

between

catalysts,

the copper

the oxygen

copper

(ii)

is supported

coverage

state for a variety

metal

of the

of synthesis

103

EXPERIMENTAL The apparatus metal

in which

area measurements

synthesis

the methanol

were made

rate measurements

240°C) with

synthesis

synthesis

is shown

gases containing

experimental

rig is totally

The copper

metal

After

(typically

5% H2/N2)

to near ambient

the helium

is then established

or a thermal

frontal

at a steady,

in this way can be calibrated

gas stream

measured

continuously detector.

is shown

by measurements

frontal

a flow of helium (typically

between

flow rate in place of

for N2 and N20 with a mass A typical

in Figure

The

in a H2/N2 mixture

is swept out with

A N20/He

conductivity

chromatogram"

of "reactive

had been reduced

the reactor

temperature.

and the exit gas monitored

spectrometer reactive

at 24O"C,

area

temperature.

PET computers.

by the technique

the catalyst

(50 bar,

the CoPPer

and ambient

by two Commodore

areas were evaluated

[4-61.

and cooled

2 and 6% N20)

controlled

pressure

2. The methanol

conditions

both CO and CO2, whilst

are made at near atmospheric

and the copper

in Figure

industrial

are made under typical

measurements

chromatography"

rate measurements

schematically

line shape

3. Copper

metal

on polycrystalline

- "a

areas

determined

copper

combined

with in situ BET area measurements. Copper

area measurements

to methanol synthesis above.

synthesis

can also be made on catalysts

conditions,

gas from the reactor

Measurement

been exposed of oxygen

of the apparent

to methanol

atom coverage

the copper

has occurred.

by rereducing the CoPPer

by first depressurising

with a stream copper

synthesis

surface

conditions

of the copper The latter

the catalyst

surface

at steady

RESULTS

and sweeping

after

measure

providing

gas mixture

of this technique N20/H2

out the as

the catalyst

a direct

state

have been exposed

and then proceeding

has

of the degree

no sintering

may be assessed

with the H2/N2

area. A full description

surface

area

gives

possibility

c4], and it has been shown that sequential copper

of helium

which

of

and allowed

for

and then redetermining

has been given elsewhere

treatments

do not affect

the

area.

AND DISCUSSION

Information surface

obtained

under methanol

catalysts

is presented

of the Cu/ZnO/A1203 Differing

copper

by varying

in Table

areas

content,

supported supported

used

for a variety

include

on a variety

commercial

of alternative

on a given oxide

and by using catalysts A number

and state of the copper

(50 bar, 240°C)

1. The catalysts

for catalysts

of reaction.

the activity

conditions

type and copper

the copper

to a long period

in this way about synthesis

of differing

which

of materials oxides.

have been achieved

have been subjected

feed gas compositions

was

also used.

Activity/copper

area relationship

The dependence is shown

in Figure

of the methanol

synthesis

4 for all the catalysts

activity

on the copper

used. There

is found

metal

area

to be an extremely

N20

IN He

P Pressure

Pa Compute1 r controlled valve

‘VALVE

OVEN

TO OVEN

P”RGLE

Apparatus for the measurement of methanol synthesis rates and of copper metal areas and total surface areas.

2z

HELIUM

5% N2 IN He

10%

CALIBRATION MIXTURE

FIGWE 2

DIOXIDE

5% ti2 IN. N2

)ti

1w

CARBON

HELIUM

HYDROGEN

SHUTDOWN

Concentration of gas phase s@?CXS

_____-_-

- - -

-

Response of Katharometer

-MSSS

Katharometer +_____-----

spectrometer signal

-

Chati

FIOW swilch in

FIGURE 3

speed

= i En’8 m&i1

Time m minutes

"Reactive frontal chromatogram" for the reaction of N20 with poly-

crystalline copper.

significant

correlation between methanol synthesis activity and copper area

fop these materials and the turnover number: the slope of Figure 4 is essential -1 site-'). The identical for all the catalysts (1.6 x to-* molecules CH30H s conclusions to be drawn are that at1 the copper is active and only the copper surface is implicated in the rate determining step of synthesis; no unique synergy attaches to the copper/zinc oxide combination, supports as diverse as MgO and Si02 have similar effects. Oxygen coverage of copper during methanol synthesis By measuring the apparent copper area after methanol synthesis reaction and comparing it to the area before reaction, the degree of oxygen coverage of the copper surface can be deduced. The fact that this is oxygen coverage and not sintering of the copper is demonstrated by rereducing the catalyst and remeasuri the copper area (Tab'le1).

From the results obtained on both Cu/ZnO/A1203 com-

positions and on a Cu/A1203 material (Table 11, it is clear that the copper is oxidised to between 25% and 40% of a monolayer (50 - 80% of a monolayer of 0~~0) depending on the ethanol

synthesis feed gas composition. Using this data and

some of our previously published data [4], Figure 5 has been assembled which shows that the steady state oxygen coverage of the copper surface under methanol synthesis conditions for both Cu~ZnO~Al~O3 and Cu/A1203 catalysts is essentially a linear function of the CO,/CO ratio in the feed, over the range of values covered. We conclude that CO is therefore the dominant reducing agent for the surface under reaction conditions,

106 Methanol synthesis Actwity/Mol s-1 g-1 xl 06 12.0 ll.OlO.O9.0 8.07.06.0 -

Cu0/2n0/A1203(60:30:10)

SO-

CuOIZnOIA12O3(45:37:18)

0

CuO/MnO

.

CuO/ZnO

30

20

40

Cu Metal Area/m2g-1

FIGURE

4

Methanol

synthesis

activity

as a function

of copper

metal

area.

Oxygen coverage (monolayers) 0.5-

0.4 -

P’ / /

0.3 -

/l /

0.2-

l



/ /

l

/ o.i-

CuO/ZnO/Al203(60:30:1o)

l

:’ /

1’

w37:

IO)

A CuO/Al2O3

/

I

I 0

I

1.0

2.0 CO2/CO

FIGURE

5

synthesis

Steady

state

conditions

oxygen

coverage

as a function

of the copper

of the C02/C0

surface

ratio.

ratio

under methanol

107 TABLE

1

Activity

and state of copper

surface

during

Activity

Initial

mol

metal

/s-' g-'

/m2 g-'

methanol

copper

area

synthesis

Re-reduced copper after

area re-

action

Apparent copper after action

/m2 g-' CuO/ZnO/A1203

9.5

x lo+-

33.1

(60:30:10)

6.3 x lO-6

24.9

CuO/ZnO/A1203

2.3 x lo+

CuO/ZnO/A12@3

5.6 x lO-6

(45:37:18)

1.2 x lo-6

3.5

layers

0.3gb

9.0

4.0

0.28'

21.6

11.4

0.24a

2.4

0.40b

12.6

9.0

44.9

42.1

CuO/A1203

4.8 x lo+

19.9

Cu/A1203

4.4 x lo-6

11.7

CuO/MnO

2.7 x lO-6

15.7

CuO/MgO

1.4 x lO+j

9.0

CuQ/MgO

2.6 x lo6

14.9

CuO/ZnO

2.85 x IO+

19.1

CO,

mono-

0.2ga

1.9 x lo6

aFeed

of cu

5.5

11.8 x lO-6

203

area coverage re-

14.0 23.1

CuO/SiO2

cd/Al

Oxygen

He 14, 14, 46, 26

bCO, CO23 H2, C02, He H2,10, 13, 52, 28 'Feed

CO, C02, H2 He 11, 11, 60, 18.

REFERENCES G.C. Chinchen, P.J. Denny, D.G. Parker, G.D. Short, M.S. Spencer, K.C. Waugh and D.A. Whan, ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry, Vo1.29, No.5, p.178 (1984). A. Ya Rozovskii, G. Lim, L.B. Liberov, E.V. Slivinskii, S.M. Loktev, Yu.B. Kagan and A.N. Bashkirov, Kinetics and Catalysis, 18 (1977) 691. M. Bowker and K.C. Waugh, to be published. G.C. Chinchen and K.C. Waugh, J. Catalysis, in press. M. Bowker, J.N.K. Hyland, H.D. Vandervell and K.C. Waugh, Proceedings 8th International Congress on Catalysis, Vol.11 (1984) 35. J.W. Evans, M.S. Wainwright, A.J. Bridgewater and J.D. Young, Applied Catalysis, 7 (1‘983) 75.