The American Association of Orthodontists Audio-Visual Library
0
ne of the most cxtensivc prot’rssional continuing education programs in existence is housed in thr central office of the American Association of Orthodontists. It has grown to a total of ninety-one individual audio-visual sequences, as listed below. Ten to fifteen new programs arc added each year after the Association’s annual session. The great majority are slide-tape programs, with a few 16 mm. films. Eight of the slide-tape programs are available in Spanish. The complete list is published herewith for the convenience of A. A. 0. members and other interested dentists. Because of the heavy demand, it is essential that orders for individual programs be placed at least 4 to 6 weeks prior to the actual date of use. A specified date, as well as the sequence number, must be indicated for booking purposes. Requests for audio-visual materials should be addressed to the American Association of Orthodontists, 7477 Delmar Blvd., St,. Ilouis, Missouri 63130. AUDIO-VISUAL All To use
LIBRARY
sequences
order must
in
a
sequence,
be
indicated.
CATALOG the
A.
the
A.
title
0.
Audio-Visual
and
Library
catalog
number,
are
available
variation
in three
desired,
and
variations.
exact
date
of
Variations 1.
The
simplest
script. clearly to
and
this
each Rental
margin
as
of
each
hand
control
the
slide.
Slide
changes
him
to
spend
as
loaded
in a Carousel
tray,
a package.
Places
for
the
manuscript,
so that
the
reader
of
the
are
much,
or
Carousel thus as
and slide
projector
under
the
little,
at
as
manu-
merely the
control
time
the changes
of
he
are presses
indicated the
needs
reader, to
study
fee-$2.50 second
point
type tray,
required
clearly
marked
presses
a
indicated permit has
of
unit
and
the
for
each in
button to of
is slide
prepared
the
change. the
slide.
audio
tape,
tape
has
The The
of
tape
may on
the
the be
slides
loaded
audible
places so
control voice
the an
the
manuscript,
hand slide.
slide-tape
the audio
In addition,
of
the
of
The
automatic
particular the
up
margin
advance a
made
manuscript.
the
on
spot study
Rental
372
slides,
sent
automatic
allows
Carousel
3.
the
advance
the
are
slide.
The
who
of
elements in the
on
spot
consists
two
marked
a button
2.
type
The
for
that
the
Carousel
tape
slide
is that
at
at
any
of
the
a the
change
listener projector
stopped
in
“beep”
are merely at
the
time
to
clinician
sequence.
fee-$250
The
third
ally
pulsed,
and
most audio
sophisticated tape,
the
package slides
loaded
consists
of
in a Carousel
the
foil-pulsed, tray,
the
or electronicmanuscript,
and
Audio-Visual a
slide
synchronizer.
place,
as
without
the
used
this
standard
one
Rental
the
capstan to
mechanically
that
the
control.
other
drive
adapt
been so
manual
with
the will
has
The
two and
but
speed
of
of
at
advance
Eastman
units, a
a variety
pulsed
slides
the
projector
recorder
33/d
proper
automatically
Carousel
the
373
inches
may per
is
be
any
second.
The
Association
of
recorders.
fee-$3.50 fee
both
on
Orthodontists
all
ways,
three
are
paid
variations
by
for
the
renter.
nonmembers
of
the
American
$10.00.
is
TREATMENT Complex
Orthodontic
Ashur
G.
in many
35
treatment.
In
some
cases
An for
use
Adult
Adu(t
40
will
T. M.
One
the
panoramic
The
55 newer
(Running
(Running
32
This
the
permit
many
complete
of
these
orthodontic
description
of
a technique
Several
presentation
obiectives, cases
panoramic
advantages
serve
radiograph. and
diagnosis panoramic
discusses
and as
appliance
illustrations.
and
After
disadvantages
treatment
are
a
and discussed.
brief the
disuse
Each
of
entity
radiographs.
183-68
Texas
be
oriented
in Intra-
and Jr.,
and
obtained compared,
by for
cephalometric
Extraoral
making clinical
M.
a
three-dimensional
evaluation
and
oriented prognosis,
with
roentgenograms.
Photography
Carolus
Cobb,
137-66 III,
Boston,
Mass.
minutes) presentation
the
This
treatment
adult.
is the
the
Analysis
may and
18
problems. loss,
PHOTOGRAPHY
tools
advantages
which
audio-visual will
since
orthodontic compromise
minutes)
F. Quigley, time:
for some
III.
Dallas,
of
Horizons
Lawrence
AND
by selected
photographs
New
adults of
require
a detailed
treatment tooth
in the
in orthodontic
time:
cast
may
present
by think
indicated,
others
to
of
therapy
Gnathostatic
Presentation
is certainly
unique
available,
J. Murphey,
gnathostatic
poses
diagnostic
equipment
Oriented
to
minutes]
illustrated
Phelps
is
187-68
radiography
is profusely
demand
patients.
ramifications
Kenilworth,
time:
the
increasing
orthodontist
N. Y.
Radiography
of of
made
RADIOGRAPHY,
(Running
an
However, of these
orthodontic
Graber,
the
approach
be
York,
often
CEPHALOMETRICS, Panoramic
be
minutes)
problems, for
to
120-64
orthodontics
considerations
an
treatment
New
time:
tissue-response
oriented
such
attempt in the
J. Seide,
[Running
C.
of
treatment.
Orthodontics
Leonard
cussion
appears reaction
minimal
rehabilitation. adapted
there
immediate
require
156-66
Adults
D.
minutes)
practices The
for
Washington,
time:
treatment. patients
Treatment
Chavoor,
[Running
which
tape
manuscript,
listener as
with
charges,
Rental
audio the
of
type,
synchronizer
Shipping
ADULT
by
need
with
slide
The
indicated
Library
evaluation
primarily of
the
presents photographic
systems part
designed of
the
record
for at
clinical the
use time
of
the
examination
by
nation,
patient
cameras
as
well
photographing are
means
of
positioning, as the
Polaroid
and
the
new
patient
film.
framing CU-5.
with
Solutions
of
the
Integrated
both
color
to
field
the
are
problems
presented
record-taking and
of
focusing,
illumi-
utilizing
older
Polaroid
systems
black-and-white
that
will
permit
instant-processing
film
described.
Roentgenogmphic Cecil
(Running This dontic are
Cephalometrics
R. Steiner,
Beverly
time:
70
Photographic Los
Part
26
the
value.
Dr.
Van
of
cephalometrics
their
correction,
to
demonstrate
Techniques
to and
this
determine to
what
the
the
results
evaluate
orthothat
usage.
191-68
minutes]
criteria,
of
the
discusses
diagnostic,
use for
Calif.
armamentarium
diagnostic
provide
is used
Angeles,
time:
of
therapy
report
Fay
other
the
plan
Orthodontic (Running
the
to
A case
C. Van,
with
deals are,
achieved.
Calif.
minutes)
presentation problems
121-64
Hills,
the
intraoral
techniques
prognostic,
orthodontist and
that and
is the
extraoral will
and
give
progress
camera.
facial
uniformly
information
As
a coordinator
photographs
to
are
good
pictures
both
the
of
of
and
great
thereby
orthodontist
and
patient.
DIAGNOSIS The
Power
George
to Estimate M.
[Running
of
time:
Dr.
Anderson
being
an
causes
of
Things
Anderson, 37
educator,
historical
we
are
dealing
point
can
the
true
three
author
problem
a
of
view.
with of
Sassouni,
(Running
The the
In
this
Class
velopment
is
which
a
Class
II elastics,
bite
Rote
Thomas
The important
time:
successful
correction
maior
A
point
and
of
many
orthodontic
each
years
problem,
discussed
approach
bone-is be
facial
theory
basis plan
a
on
in turn recognizing
emphasized.
the from that
Only
then
determined.
Differential
of
this,
types
the a
is
proposed.
specific
case
which
palatal
splitting,
or Reason
Treatment
basic
differential
described:
Different full-band
the
open-bite,
underlying
diagnosis
is illustrated and
are
mechanism orthodontic (vertical
their
is established forces headcap,
defrom
are
then
chin
cap,
technique).
168-67
Augusta,
Ga.
minutes] orientation
of
orthodontic
discipline
at
times.
aspects use
it are and
Diagnosis
four III.
the
plane,
diagnostic
discretionary more
in
35
mechanical
the
a broad-based muscle
its
vantage
of
Pa.
On
J. Zwemer,
(Running
about
develop
and
the
nature
done
Differential
treatment
applied
from
The
be to
problem
Class
proposed.
be
Diagnosis:
need
For
and
differential to
can
sequence,
II,
181-68
minutes)
slide-tape
deep-bite,
selected
40
questions
systems-teeth,
Pittsburgh,
time:
Worth
clinician.
what
three
nature
basic and
and
Facial Types: A Basis Planning 146-66 Viken
True
Md.
minutes]
discusses
the
at Their
Baltimore,
of of
orthodontic the
orthodontic
This
diagnosis appliances
treatment
tends
sequence
emphasizes
the
recognized,
permit
which,
if
themselves.
to
overshadow
the cognitive a
alland
routinely
Audio-Visual GENERAL
Orthodontic
T. M.
Graber,
(Running This
time:
55
of
stringent
limitations
GROWTH
is directed
(Running
taking
and
facial
growth
125
Fred
II
This its
analyzed
the
Vertical
controls
on
of facial
type
The Vertical Donald
and occlusal
time:
abnormal clearance
have
with
special
growth
the to
field. the
and
Part
blood, been
reference
to
developmental
re-
phe-
I is primarily
dentition.
Cephalofacial
to
biologic
jaws
on
Clinical
cranial
implications
of
Complex
in the
First
Two
Decades
timing
share
in
and this
is sequential
over-all
in the
pattern.
sense
Growth
of
inter-
illustrated.
118-64
current
growth.
concepts
It
it affects
of the
will
influences
of
malocclusion
in Orthodontic Toronto,
on
show
treatment.
iaws
treatment
An the
vertical
attempt
is also
growth
growth
in
will
behavior
be
of the
of
the
vertical
made
to
mandible.
the
face
and
dimension show
The
how
the
importance
discussed.
Treatment
Ontario,
the
how
Planning
136-66
Canada
minutes)
is in two interocclusal in
the
structures
Pa.
and
discuss
how
90
including
normal
Texas
Dimension
sequence
tissues,
minutes)
G. Woodside,
(Running This
and
will
in the
in
the
Dimension
55
growth
craniofacial
is linked
Houston,
and
of
the
mainly
of
face,
anteroposterior
overbite
mechanism
the
the
discussion
subject.
research
Philadelphia,
growth
presentation
effect
these
After
forming
is a detailed
minutes)
Head,
time:
of
masses
There
development,
the
devoted
and
Krogman,
F. Schudy,
latest is
Body
are
[Running
with
primordial
elucidated.
60
physical
abnormal
the palate.
elements.
describes the
Part
phases.
Discover
the and
minutes)
are
time:
relationships
in
described,
III.
sequence
Marion
Human
are
101-63
Kenilworth,
incorporates
(Running
to
concerned
The Growth of the of Life 104-63
rapid-slow
implement
described
116-64
of and
differentiation
skeletal
Development
aspects;
Wilton
techniques
Structures
tongue,
and and
today
phenomena
Oral
development
face,
is given
time:
and
the
development
two-part
and
and
of
nervous,
place
[Running
and
the
Graber,
nomena
Simple
is to
as
Mich.
growth
consideration
This
Its goal
Orthodontists,
minutes)
structures
to
T. M.
practitioner. of
Education.
Face
Arbor,
the
muscular,
Growth
Orthodontic
of the
35 of
deeper
discussed,
general
Association
stressed.
Ann
time:
reference
the
American
on
are
discussion
vascular, search
Council
K. Avery,
and
toward
the
Development
James
119-64
Practice
DEVELOPMENT
Prenatal
face
of
the
AND
in General
III.
minutes)
presentation
brochure
in
Procedures
Kenilworth,
recommendations
A
375
PRACTICE
Limited
the
Library
parts. clearance
cephalometric
The
factors are
analysis
responsible reviewed. and
for The
in
the
the
importance differential
development of
of
abnormal
diagnosis
and
normal intertreat-
376 ment
planning
of
mandibular III
Librwy
Audio-Visuul
overbite
malocclusions
and
direction
the
creation
Class
The
time:
Probably
the
sequence
which
mandible
large
influence
to
purposeful
in
conjunction
interocclusal
involving the
with of
clearances
of
postural
temporary
Class
position
creation
preorthodontic
in the
functional
planning
in the the
method
mesial
treatment
alterations
A simple
Eruption
and 15
malocclusion
approach
of
guidance
treatment
of
a by
certain
Class
is outlined.
of Tooth
J. Zwemer
(Running
This
of
Significance
Thomas
at
is outlined,
Ill malocclusions
of
An
attempt
the
clearance
temporary
II and
treatment
discussed.
an
of
interocclusal
the
are
involving
growth
large
and
displacement
Jack
189-68
D. Zwemer,
Evans,
Ga.
minutes)
most
critical
deals
with
the
developing
time
of
dental
of
tooth
problems
development eruption
and
is the
mixed-dentition
period.
points
out
factors
the
various
dentition.
HABITS A Matter T. M.
of Care
Graber,
(Running This York
time:
sound
City,
The
The
current
ponents
of
mental
types
definite
the
Kyrle
over
up
need
Not
cussions
30
least
tooth
facial
and
attainment
these center
An show plane,
time:
to
gonial
of
role one
This
diagnostic
in
in New
them.
malformations
of
the
most
presentation
and
mal-
important
classifies
com-
the
procedures,
and
fundaoffers
a
117-64
Growth
and
of
of
“normal are
thumb-sucking they
are
are
not
always
It
habit
which
practices
is
for
the
the
Unfortunately, the
and
subject the
purpose
affect
of
only
much
this
dis-
while
they annoy-
habits
of
oral
indi-
most
finger-sucking,
and
malformation.
occlusion”
habits.
and
habits
parents,
arch
so-called factors
childhood
many
a variety
San 37
involved
sequence
growth,
dental
to occlu-
to
extraoral angle,
Mateo,
Open-Bite Cases with Syndrome 128-65
Steep
Mandibular
Plane
Calif.
minutes]
is made
is paid where
with
development.
analysis
attention
their
specific
influential about
recognized
J. Straub,
(Running
and study tongue.
Facial
The Successive Treatment of Skeletal Angles, Complicated by the Tongue-Thrust Walter
recently
coping
problems.
Oral
the
habits
displacement
and
made
of
Md.
among
discuss
means
minutes)
commonly
and
definitive
tongue
Affecting
embarrassment
illustrate sion,
for
programs
simple
problems a
illustrates
influence
the
most
and
for
Baltimore,
concerning
the
ance
muscle system-the
routine
time:
television and
11 O-63
tongue-thrust,
factors
one-hour
Mich.
stomatognathic
Preis,
(Running
vidual.
the
Habits
W.
Many
in
concern
treatment
97-65
film)
problems
Arbor,
minutes)
of
Childhood
two
Problem 50
points
on habit
Ann
time:
picture
minutes)
muscle
E. Moyers,
occlusion
motion III.
based
Tongue-Thrust
(Running
mm.
120
movie,
describes
Robert
are
(16
Kenilworth,
of
patterns force and
recent
contributions
where
vertical
can direction
produce of
to growth
literature
is dominant.
demonstrable growth.
the
The
changes actual
on
the
Recent
subiect. research
in vertical
elevation
of
height, the
palatal
Particular is cited occlusal plane
to
and
flattening
scoliosis,
of
philosophy
LAY
with
palatal
vault
by
by Alexander
conventional
the
in his
extraoral
Milwaukee
study,
brace
shows
therapy
is
the
during
the
treatment
far-reaching
effect.
in
of
illustrated
a series
of
Use
of
case
this
reports.
EDUCATION Straight
Talk
About
Produced
by
(Running
time:
This class,
film
slide
helps
varied
causes
to-understand clinical Particularly men
to
women
Dentistry
Through
(Running
time:
This
mm.
16
comprehensive minutes,
the
and
the
color
lively
cartooning
parent,
the Ages sound
gamut
ages
periodontic,
excellent
parent-education
other
school
the
to
measures
opportunity.
(16
in
showing
health
well-being
clarify
all
ages.
movie)
speech can
adult
of
problem
cause
cases.
are
actual
and for
mm.
or
that
problems
explain
educational
health habits
orthodontic
but
color
inadequate
movie
individual
from
infancy
The
oral
of
group, is for
a child’s against
corrective
a career
the
described.
because
how
warns
photography
of Man
and for
of
and
teacher concern
faulty
The
explored “before
and
orthodontic Also
many in easyafter”
treatment.
inviting
to
young
99-65
minutes]
dentistry
illustrated
and
choosing
23
and
or
Graphic the
when
and/or whose
It
preventive
with
helpful
and
fee
parent
when,
malocclusions
teams
any
organization
treatment.
includes of
for
civic
whether,
language.
cases
rental
community’s
answer It
AAO-PR
Relations-No
is ideal or
orthodontic
alignment.
and
film club,
or the
from
Teeth
Public
minutes)
people’s
benefit
tooth
on
20
own
The may
Straight
Council
full-color
young
children-their
are
the
as described
key
surgery,
the entire
to
the old
elements and
preventive
stresses and
age to
facets
family
is run
the
prosthetic
and
various
interceptive
and
the
orthodontist
care
and In 23
the
must
earlier.
preventive a lifetime.
manifold
are
which
care
of
during
problems
oral
problems
serve
in
film
serves
The
later
life as
an
vehicle.
MISCELLANEOUS Cephalofacial Leonard
Relationships A.
time:
Physical
anthropologists
Mongolian.
There
is
group
and
most
often
that
these
from data
the
another
the
authenticity
planning,
and
or norms
prepared
[Running The and
of
for
treated
concept
that on
racial
of Ankylosed 50
Rockville
anatomy
is
more
Teeth Centre,
racial
have
been
developed
have
discovered
other
racial
racial groups
beautiful
related
individuals
and
to
features.
each
investigators
three is
of
in norms
for
Negro,
cephalofacial
groups. are
than
ethnic
Com-
presented,
healthful
orthodontic
rather
or
than
treatment on
standards
groups.
129-65 N. Y.
minutes)
tooth, in
the
of used
variability
or ethnic
of
found
the
face
groups-Caucasian,
basis and
when of
one
Cephalofacial
the
A number
modified
relationships
is placed
Biederman, time:
be
racial
on
Standards
children.
must
specific
three features
groups.
Caucasian
the
into in part,
cephalofacial
cephalofacial
emphasis
ankylosed
the
norms
of
men
made,
different
briefly.
Management
William
in
or
all
are
between
is discussed
The
divide divisions
studies on
D. C.
minutes)
variability
especially standards
parative and
60
These
great
152-66
Washington,
(Running
and
ated,
Altemus,
terms
one
of of
the basic
anomalies bone
of biology.
tooth
eruption,
Frequency,
is diagnosed, locale,
and
differentiincidence
are
considered each
in relation
are
to
delineated.
A Multidisciplinary Lancaster A.
Palate
This Cleft proach
and
by
Clinic, similar
service
first
Fastening A.
This
film
describes
wire
25
in
(Running
time:
the
a new
the
in
for
New
mm.
York,
Lancaster and
federal
multidisciplinary The
other
ap-
Lancaster
institutions
movie)
N.
by
which
Cleft
desiring
to
96-67 W.
G.
Martin,
L. 0.
Oden,
Y.
automatically
demonstrates as
the
well
dispensed
applicability
are
the
“C”
of
speed
and
this
rings
hold
instrument
comfort
to
with
which
secured.
of Mandibular
M.
Rankow,
of
Prognathism
and
true
the
the
for
Angle
between
cases
of
Mullen,
Julius
Tarshis,
Class
III
which
true may
prognathism.
Dingman
and
123-65 New
York,
and
malocclusion
N.
are
pseudo-Class
III
be
treated
conservatively
Case
reports
will
procedures
Placement
Pompton
35
Y.
(through
Removal
of
the
and
illustrate
the
presented.
and both
In-
differen-
those
which
condylotomy
body).
Orthodontic
Appliances
(16
mm.
movie
three
saliva with
the
bands.
also
helps
time:
75
Cavitron
can not
selection,
of
Oral
the saliva
be
used
only
produce
by
Dallas,
the
complete
method
expenditure
Prognathia
limitations
for
operator
less
J. Murphey,
combined
This
with
It demonstrates
ejectors
which
the
with
of
N. J.
is concerned
technique.
ease
mouth
Lakes,
minutes)
the
of
model
(16
Shown
those
under
the
a
the
the
state
professions.
K. J. Malovany,
Huettner,
diagnosis
a multiband
with
(Running
various
Orthodontics
treatment
and
time:
Phelps
of
of both
98-65 W.
Correction
methods
and
sound-and-color
but
blending
the as
by
minutes)
Technic
(Running
As
35
ramus)
Richard
a clean
154-66
development
J.
and
and
reduction
Simplified movie)
tion
serves
method
Robin
between
(through
shows
type,
and recognition
The of
L. Whitman,
differential
diagnosis surgical
It
its
brackets
DiSalvo,
diagnosis are
fracture
discussed.
Management
A.
operation
are
for
be changed
Nicholas
This
founding growth,
techniques.
can
bands
Disorders
minutes)
the
orthodontic
require
of
the
contributions
C.
Orthodontic-Surgical
tial
for
E. Cumpston
The
Robert
and
arch
The
Charles
describes
Device
time:
cluded
recommendations
Pa.
K. Cooper.
of
DiSalvo,
T. Tunstall,
wires
and
rendered
the
(Running
arch
specific
service.
A Rapid
current
H.
showing
as
Nicholas G.
and
illustrated.
Communicative
Lancaster,
E. Long,
Dr.
is illustrated,
Palate
are
minutes)
sequence
Clinic
render
an
26
slide-tape
agencies,
situations
failures
to Oral-facial
Clinic,
Ross
time:
Palate
possible
and
Director
Cooper,
(Running
Six
successes
Approach
Cleft
H. K. Cooper, John
etiology.
Both
a chair
Surgery
more time
and
of
a central
evacuation, for
offers
cementation,
use
scaling
a more durable
and
Orthodontic
and
reflection.
fear
method
banding
removal system,
tissue
without
efficient cement
during
and
and vacuum of of
gives
cement
cementa-
the
patient
debanding.
162-67
Therapy
Texas
minutes) of
conventional
surgery
and
tooth-moving orthodontic
treatment
appliances are
became being
more
developed
apparent, to
achieve
Audio-Visual rapid,
stable,
one
and
technique
surgeon
and
H.
Donald Paul
H. Roth,
San
time:
to
40
present
sequence
illustrates
“team”
approach
of
Calif.
minutes)
some
is
of
intended
the
not
basic
as
a
fundamental
substitute
for
principles
of
a course this
of
study
technique
but,
that
are
It will
Demonstrate alloy
This The
Wash.
sequence
in orthodontics.
1.
deformities. prognathism.
Calif.
Mateo,
Seattle,
slide-tape
rather,
dentofacial
maxillary
148-66 Alameda,
(Running
of
379
is illustrated.
Parker,
D. Lewis,
This
of
correction
Soldering
John
treatment
basal
orthodontist
Electric
useful
successful
for
Library
a simple
wires
with
method
a
for
minimum
the
of
repair
heat
or
transfer
reinforcement to
areas
of
fractured
adjacent
to
chrome
the
point
of
fracture. 2.
Demonstrate can
be
use 3.
the
simplicity
useful
of
in
electric
any
ease
by
which
spring
appliances
in
appliances
which
of
they
are
measured indicated
force by
the
on
re-
soldering.
Demonstrate
the
pairing
and orthodontic
wires
instantaneous
within
flow
1 mm.
of
of
high-fusing
acrylic
gold
without
or
significant
silver
solders
transfer
to
the
plastic
material. 4.
include
a few
short
case
The Temporomandibular Robert
M.
(Running This joint. problems
55
the
The
The
Nuk
Rocky
Sauger time:
theory
physiologic play
is
Resistance Unitek (Running
Stress Unitek (Running
and
the
time:
Relief
Heat
Corporation, time:
of
the
biologic
contributions
the
of
the
the
understanding,
temporomandibular
Company,
traditional
Denver,
of
the
nipple
and
temporomandibular
so
that
clinical of there
this is
an
joint.
Colo.
Nuk which
Practice
Calif.
and
Practice
Calif.
minutes)
Treatment Monrovia,
20
background,
minutes]
Monrovia, 20
research
kinesiologic
Welding-Theory
Soldering-Theory Corporation,
of
are
appreciation
development the
Monrovia, 20
implications
discussion
Sauger calls
tongue-thrusting.
Resistance time:
149-66
minutes)
replacing
Corporation,
(Running
totality 105-63
40
an better
Products
perpetuates
Orthodontic
a
Dental
behind
and
and
for
broadest
in the
Story
nursing,
Unitek
joint,
functional
Mountain
[Running The
the
Mechanism
Calif.
the
pursued
the plea
of
the Jaw
minutes)
avenues
main
and
Palisades,
encompasses
involving
appreciation
into
Pacific
presentation
Among
area.
Joint
Rickets, time:
presentations.
minutes]
108-63 Calif.
107-63
106-63
nipple. abnormal
The
goal
is truly
muscle
habits
380
Audio-C'isuul About
Faces
Thomas
One
time:
of
appearance. and
the
strongest
The
various
in and
discussed
and
Expansion
J. Haas,
[Running
our
“face-conscious”
objective
society
criteria
illustrated
by
and
the
author.
the
history
is
concern
considerations
of
about the
facial
This
human
claim
cases
“the
and
therapy
has
5 years
of
long
and
presented.
to
palate-expansion
offered
treat
to
substantiate
‘impossible’
cases
and
procedure
will
features
of the
be
discussed
appliance
and and
illustrated.
its construction.
147-66 Minn.
basal
bone
orthodontists.
of
the
loads
amount in
discrepancies This
of
rapid
expansion
to
produce
appliance
during
slide-tape
analyzing
required
Modifications
also
the
salient
procedures
the
it possible
the
be
minutes)
intrigued
Evidence
skeleton
of
to the
correcting
experimental
procedure.
of
will
routine.”
Expansion
50 of
evidence
makes
Minneapolis,
time:
concept
consider
experimental
technique
given
Maxillary
(Running
briefly
application
be
J. Isaacson,
The
Ohio
animal
relatively
will
Orthopedic Robert
that
for
attention
will
and
become
Indications Finally,
Falls,
minutes)
sequence
Both
difficult
60
slide-tape
author’s
159-67
Cuyahoga
time:
procedure.
the
sequence maxillary
produced these
construction
expansion in
of
areas
different
activation,
orthopedic
a summary as an
in different
effects and
course presents
of
age
based
of
orthopedic the
facial
groups
upon
the
are data,
suggested.
Rapid
Palatal
Robert
A.
(Running
Expansion
Wertz, 40
of
the
is discussed. clinical
maxillary
components
Emphasis
is placed
on
with
attendant
anatomic
opening
considerations,
of
the
appliance
midpalatal construction,
ADMINISTRATION Orthodontic
George
N.
(Running Your
Practice Boone,
time:
auxiliary
ing
experience.
this
slide-tape
Efficient
48
practice
personnel, To
can
better
you
Ofiice
Design West 30
have
the
practice
our come
124-65 Lafayette,
minutes)
which
environment, make
understand
sequence
time:
185-68
Calif.
minutes)
E. Draper,
(Running
Environment
Pasadena,
orthodontic
your
Paul
III.
minutes)
application.
PRACTICE The
158-67
Kankakee,
time:
Expansion and
motivations subjective
are
Palatal
Andrew
suture
Ga.
minutes)
EXPANSION
Rapid
are
Augusta,
25
balance
PALATE
the
184-68
J. Zwemer,
(Running
form
Libwry
lnd.
philosophy
to visit
is what of
our
orthodontics concerning
office.
I like
to
call
your
a successful ofTice
procedures,
office and
and
rewardthrough
An tice.
office
design
is presented
The
objective
is
presentation
may
offer
Patient
and
Paul
There
is
a
treatment.
The
importance
of
time:
cussed,
tasks
and
time:
of the
an
orthodontic
successful
this
orthodontic
and
The
be
theme
illustrated. is the
that
office
The
team.
This
the
The
and offtce
practice
productivity.
“team”
in
pyramid
is dis-
the
personnel.
unique
and
is essential
if
sequence
is beneficial
efficiency of
service.
are
ahead
achieved.
office parts
specialty
practice
Planning practice
greater
important
to specific
Iowa
of
and
the
Case
effort”
40
significantly
the
best
discusses
to the
different
possible and
orthodontist,
illustrates his
from
service,
under
a
modern
professional
team,
is an the
This
55
as
a
clerical
professional
relations
will
Audio-Visual
The
time:
and
certain principles reviewed.
pitfalls and
and
patient,
and
Administration
suggest
a number
concerning
the
treatment. case
This
sequence
presentation,
out-
enhancing
a
parents.
of
an
Orthodontic
of
important
appointment
suggested
be illustrated
and
file
Practice
131-65
for
management
schedule, income
tax
considera-
management use,
and
of public
elaborated.
and
Park,
Pitfalls
160-67
Calif.
minutes) sequence
patient
orthodontic
Mich.
matters,
Canoga 12
audio-visual
in parent
Better
Sequence-Promises
F. Mulick,
(Running
dentist,
will
policy
book,
James
of
education
minutes]
sequence
items
part
patient
Detroit,
appointment
The
of
Toward
Martinek,
automated
Such
important
orthodontist,
Suggestions time:
163-67 D. C.
minutes)
aspects
from
(Running
Presentation
Washington,
important
C. Edward
are
allotted
130-65
counseling
Some
and
most
orthodontic
Moines,
is to
time:
Patient
These
and described
is stressed.
demand
the
Planning
P. Kerrigan,
[Running
tions.
that
patient.
James
“team
are
assistance
Des
minutes)
orthodontic
of
are
practice.
Consultation
lines
cooperation
motivation
conditions
60
conditions,
concept
prac-
believed
to others.
patient
patient and
greater
in Office
general
optimum
orthodontic
is
III.
one
various
demands
of
one It
minutes)
C. Jefferies,
The those
50
of
(Running
use
for
stress.
179-68
horizons
Foresight Frank
between
education
discusses
and
of
well
less
Ind.
of
socioeconomic
expanding
be
very
with
164-67
facets
Kenilworth,
sequence
might
correlation
parental
Changing This
high
Graber,
(Running
worked
patients,
15 minutes)
Personnel
T. M.
that
Lafayette,
salient
Auxiliary
has
to
Motivation
West
time:
which
service
ideas
Parent
E. Draper,
(Running
better
has
education must pitfalls
be
great
and avoided and
their
promise
motivation. in
the
application
in the Certain construction to
orthodontic basic
the
and varied
office
principles
as must
production needs
of of
the
an
auxiliary
be
followed sequences.
orthodontist
the and
382
Audio-T’isunl Audio-Visual James
Parent
M.
(Running
time:
personnel This
is
time:
ing
of
them
are
Through
proper
superior
lob
a
training, for
auxiliary
us.
This
idea
is
registered
clinic
presented
at
the
1966
annual
Orthodontists.
out the
the
objectives
myriad
of
of
proper
questions
Potential
50
the
for
Amboy,
pitfalls
telephone
placed are
by
illustrated,
and
technique
patients and
through
means
of
the avoid-
Efficient
Practice
Management
135-65
N. J.
minutes)
keynote
of
manner
possible,
recognition
of
team
should
design
and
ofice
Otfice
Perth
efficient
professional proper
a
of
sets for
Orthodontic
time: is
ensuring
of
communication.
an
Service most
help.
often
Conn.
sequence
Zagoreen,
(Running
the
can
and
suggested.
Designing Sidney
178-68
minutes)
answers
telephone
Personnel
illustrated.
recording
37
possible
good
are
Westport,
slide-tape
Auxiliary
177-67
H. Sands,
(Running
Utilizing
aids
a
Association
Technique
Richard
means
do
methods
American
Telephone
This
to
on-the-spot
the
illustrates
audio-visual
taught
suggested an
of
Education
Texas
minutes)
colorful
be
and
Patient
Lubbock,
65
and can
session
and
Reynolds,
interesting pursued,
Librcr~?j
orthodontics
orthodontic be
as
a
specialty.
maintaining
a
“noblesse
kept
to
Facilities
high
level
oblige.”
Stress
a
minimum,
as
this
some
of
routine
should
of
personal
and
strain
sequence
foster
this
contact for
points
the out,
in and
entire through
execution.
RETENTION Retention
170-67
Richard
A.
(Running An ning.
time:
attempt
the
SERIAL
in
records
retention
(Running
clusion
the
classification at
appliances
The
and
least
is also
10
requirements description
years
of of
retention
plan-
retention
postretention.
prognosis
Some
description
included.
45
and
Used are
results
for
Serial
60
greatly
between
the
authentic
borderline
serial
extraction
irregularity,
with
maloctreatment
in each.
112-63
Mass.
minutes]
progressive properly,
190-68
nonextraction
Extraction
Salem,
extraction with reduced.
considerations basic
differences
postretention
time: or
the
similar
R. Mayne,
Precautions
minutes)
deceptively
Rationale
(Running
and
III.
defines
the
Warren
Serial
Requirements Evanston,
time:
and
three
is a
malocclusions
and
sequence
procedures
the
describe
treated
Extraction:
This
problems
to sequence
EXTRACTION
B. F. Dewel,
appliance
made the
of
Wash.
minutes)
techniques
Serial
therapy.
Seattle,
40 is
Included
with of
Riedel,
systems-skeletal,
are
has
adequate Indications, discussed. muscle,
long
been
diagnostic
an
adjunct
procedures
contraindications, Interpretations are and
tooth.
to and
orthodontic acumen,
mechanothe
appliance
diagnostic procedures, made concerning the
role
and of
Serial
Extraction
Quentin
M.
(Running This pros
time:
45
cons
material
sequence
of
on
St. Louis,
serial
clinical
presents
extraction
a
and
extraction
development,
MO.
minutes]
audio-visual
and
and
155-66
Ringenberg,
critique
presents
procedures.
treatment
timing,
of
seriul
evidence
Consideration
length
of
extraction.
evolved is given
treatment,
It
from
and
evaluates
controlled
to
its
stability
effects of
the
research on
growth
ultimate
results.
TECHNIQUES The
Test
Mclver,
[Running
time:
52
minutes)
on
twenty
ends
study
BEGG
comments
Begg
Harry
and
95-68
Minn.
describes
a
treated
light
cases.
suggestions
Light-Wire
Barrer,
[Running
force
technique
It shows
for
The author
Technique
Reading,
time:
stress
38
in
purtenances,
so
the
improved
for
results
extraction
of
extraction the
treatment
treatment,
treatment
and
it
mechanics.
describes
minutes)
this as
182-68
Pa.
audio-visual
to
provide
personal
sequence the
is on
highest
modifications
level
of
he
feels
that
manipulation service
of
with
will
help
Begg
minimum produce
technique
ap-
problems.
The
better
results
with
third
stage
finishing
pro-
effort.
The
Third
Sidney
Stage,
This the
Begg
Brandt,
(Running
40
will
technique.
teeth
adjacent
plete
treatment
Basic
so
The
sites,
Begg
Philosophy
(Running
time:
underlying of
be
and
of
of
that
is involved
lower
incisors,
tooth
the
with root
repositioning
paralleling
is necessary
of
to
com-
appliances.
Kingsport,
Tenn.
attempt
to
embrace
management Extraction
placed
on
the
explanation
Treatment
and three as
all of
separate to
Australia
and
practical
the
Begg
fundamental
what
stages
factors
technique-from
nonextraction
cases of
happens
will
be
treatment, and
that
both with
how
the
discussed. efforts
it happens.
114-63
Technique
South
of
the
minutes) principles
cases
and
whatever
A. White,
aspects.
Adelaide, 70
upper
removal
successful
satisfactory
R. Simms,
and
will
the will
a
the
mechanotherapy
treatment
minutes)
technical
emphasis toward
essayist’s
of
140-66 Ralph
sequence in
and
Milton
method.
34
phase
both
to the
and
tape-slide
Particular
illustration
Moss
time:
philosophical
The
extraction
imperative
directed
of
Technique
W.
the
is the
preparatory
(Running This
demonstrate
This torquing
to
Begg
George
N. J.
minutes)
presentation including
145-66
Technique
Millburn,
time:
Begg
cedures,
are
movie)
TECHNIQUE The
of
movie
done
with
mm.
Minneapolis,
color-and-sound
a
less
(16
W.
This and
of a Technique
Lawrence
treated
by
Norman
application Cetlin
of
of Newton
the
Begg
Centre,
approach, Mass.,
using
with this
Am.
Atypical
Extraction
Treatment
Brainerd
F. Swain,
Morristown,
(Running
time:
minutes)
The will
40
application
be
of
described.
tooth-width
the
The
cases
with
Begg
F. Swain,
[Running
time:
The
40
lems
will
be
oral
therapy
overbite,
the
discussed.
or
as
seven
atypical
congenital
problems
absence,
in conjunction
with
anterior
treatment,
and
be discussed.
Begg
Technique
144-66
N. J.
Begg
The to
the
the
will
of
such
minutes) of
prior and
19G9
143-66
treatment
before
loss,
with
the
anomalies,
extractions
Morristown,
application
Technique
in
of
anchorage
Treatment
Brainerd
Begg
technique
unlike
undue
Nonextraction
the
April
N. J.
management
discrepancies,
referral
with
J. Orthodontics
technique
in the
management
Begg
of
treatment,
relative
the
magnitude
of
treatment
Class
of
seven
nonextraction
II malocclusions
maintenance
forces
of
used
in
with
anchorage,
nonextraction
prob-
the
use
of
the
correction
treatment
extraof
will
be
discussed.
The
Pure
Begg
Karl
von
der
(Running This Begg
time:
slide
60
is
manipulation, tooth
von
(Running
the
extraction traction. extraction be
A
and
[Running is
and,
second,
The
Begg
Dr. treatment Begg The
Begg of
technique basic
of
Begg.
application
of
optimum
by
those
these What
the
Begg
malocclusions can
cases
tests these
technique which
are
be
which
require
end
and
treated
exwithout
result
the
the
without
be
the
are,
extensively
not
resolved
can
passed,
criteria
is
do
will
results
show
which
can
180-68
III.
Stage
to
previous
there
are
III
productions two
by
parts:
first,
auxiliaries-torquing
Dr. a
von
der
discussion
and
Heydt of
paralleling
on
arch
the
wires,
mechanisms.
LaGrange,
its
III.
minutes)
evolved in
the
malocclusions
Appliance
Ellyn,
instance,
a
malocclusion.
considerations
to Dr.
pure
132-65 55
has
of of
When
sequence
this
Theory time:
the
appliance
minutes)
T. Williams,
(Running
which
sequence,
141-66
impression,
passed
esthetics.
Glen
a discussion
Raleigh
Technique
treatment
be
Light-Wire
35
In
the
must
a companion
technique.
response by
by
treatment
explored.
Heydt,
time:
Begg
details
of
Ill.
technique.
Begg
der
mechanical
designed
percentage
facial be
of the von
This
tests
Begg
will
Action
Begg
of
the
typical
orthodontic in
certain
desirable
anticipated,
Karl
general
of by
stability
the
Ellyn,
the
discussion
appliances
with
efficient
series
a
minutes]
the
teeth.
of is
of
using
extremely A
explanation Included
Glen
45
to
and
an
observation
Heydt,
time:
Contrary used
is
Treatment der
III.
minutes)
movement,
Nonextraction Karl
Ellyn,
executed.
and
for
133-65
Glen
sequence
technique
forces
Technique Heydt,
new His
pure of
form the
concept technique produces
Begg
theory
of
normal
exploits unique are
occlusion, the
new
responses illustrated
to
be
concept. of and
the
used
as
a basis
Employment hard
discussed
and in this
of soft
for the
tissues.
sequence.
The
Treatment
Raleigh
of
(Running
time:
Formerly,
the
aged problem.
orthodontic
provide
have
to
sions
with
root
time:
severe
Technique
142-66
molars
had
been
lost
picture
and
can
encourage
orthodontist
or
a
severely
dam-
difficult the
technical patient
with
it easily.
Treated
with
the
Begg
Technique
167-67
III.
cases,
room
to
later.
and
treat
This
the
the
sequence
necessary
satisfactory
even
the
at
the
four
time
of
are
shown.
first
Often,
successful
the
changes
of
properly.
illustrates
teeth
facial
removal
malocclusion
premolars
third
treatment
treatment.
may
molars of
may
malocclu-
Anchorage
control,
TECHNIQUE Metal
Removable
Samuel
D. Gore,
[Running
time:
The
Sr., 60
Crozat
Part
and
cases
(Running
Knoxville,
35
Part
time:
III.
time:
Note:
These
EDGEWISE
T.
minutes)
15
minutes)
of the
sequences
removable principles
(80 the
Crozat
may
Lindquist,
(Running The
time:
search
changes
appliances, and
design,
application
of
and
principles
the
technique.
slides)
be
Appliance
Appliance booked
for
of
extraction
(40
Correctly
(80
slides)
slides)
individually
or as a package.
inch
lighter
range
of
of
Edgewise Quentin [Running
more be
contains
time:
voluminous
arch
wires
and
and
modifications. arches, decrease
Louis,
forces
A
retains The
the basic modifications
and the
or
clinical years.
other
forces
have
clinical
prompted
approach
to
concepts include
auxiliaries
of
which
many the
prob-
the edgethe use of
increase
the
involved. 188-68
a Technique?
MO.
minutes)
amount orthodontic
few which
Philosophy St.
optimal
past
presented
many
Ringenberg, 65
nearly the
multiple-loop
Mechanism-A M.
Newer 165-67
Ind.
in
will
brackets,
activity
and
mechanics
but slot
to
minutes)
cases
appliance
0.018
Appliance Mechanics
Indianapolis, 40
in treatment
techniques
of the
Appliance Manipulate
35
the Edgewise of Treatment
John
A
La
TECHNIQUE
Adapting Concepts
wise
Orleans,
minutes)
Philosophy
[Running
New
Tenn.
a Well-Fitting
II. Adiustments-To
(Running
103-63
Jr.,
126-65
Parker,
time:
Appliance
D. Gore,
illustrate
Technique A.
I. Making
Part
Samuel
disadvantages
Selected
William
or Crozat
and
minutes)
advantages
discussed.
The
lem
Cases
of
paralleling,
Begg
minutes)
removed
Precious
are
37
removal
the
discouraging the
execute
arch-length-discrepancy
be
with
first
a
technique,
and
LaGrange,
sufficient
CROZAT
whose with
Begg
T. Williams,
(Running
not
the
Extraction
Raleigh
In
patient
prognosis
Eight-Tooth
Cases
III.
orthodontist
with
favorable
Extraction
minutes)
the
Now,
Molar
LaGrange,
40
presented
a very
First
T. Williams,
of
literature philosophies.
appears Confusion
in
our
journals
frequently
concerning exists
as
orthodontic to
whether
a
specific
appliance
pose
of
this
technique tions
in and
orthodontic
The
changes
and
the
The
cious
time: of
only
result;
therapeutic actual
upon
projections
approach
of
the
The
edgewise of
its
in treating
edgewise
use,
with
appliance
procedures
primary
pur-
appliance
in
as observed
as
its
the
edgewise
relation
to
through
research
tissue
Bailey
N.
Jacobson,
Chicago,
III.
sequence
that
be
in
on
position
various
the
the
control
movement
tooth
The
demonstrate
placed
continued
tooth
extremes
is to
will
over
needed
to are steps
an
anatomic
of
tooth
changes
treatment
various
ability
uses
the
of
movement.
produce will
best
needed be
present-day through
Emphasis
the
not
the
appliance, possible
to
and
achieve
illustrated
the
by
iudi-
is placed
a
most desired
number
of
THERAPY Extraoral
James
Jay,
(Running Total the
Therapy New
time:
It
50
the to
of
be
a complete
Forces
(Running
time:
treatment
planning. approach
etiologic
test
for
Total to
basis
for
orthodontic extraoral
orthodontic
orthodontic
therapy,
leading
appliance
treatment
technique
rather
than
an
are
discussed.
of
of
light-wire
Unusual Force
R. Jarabak,
(Running
time:
Congenital
tissue
reaction
the
technique.
Class
III
Malocclusion
to
these
forces
with
176-67 Ind.
minutes)
growth
defects,
such
problems.
much
and
to illustrate
Appliances
Hammond,
35
treatment
therapy
treatment
an
Differential
Joseph
Ind.
minutes)
through
Treatment
111-63
Hammond, 55
principles is carried
learn
and
a diagnostic
TECHNIQUE
light R. Jarabak,
special
in
to
Joseph
light
of
growth
LIGHT-WIRE
The
utilization
therapies.
Differential
A case
represents
the
therapy
JARABAK
minutes]
permits
other
N. Y.
therapy
harnessing
allows
122-64
York,
extraoral
procedures.
about
These
the
as craniofacial will
normal.
be
This
dysostosis
described
and
sequence
has
or
Crouzon’s
illustrated.
disease,
From
information
of
the
value
pose
pathologic for
routine
Therapy. Treatment
of
Class
Loyola-Jarabak Robert (Running Although plish
a
indica-
151-66
facilitate
objective.
Total
we
philosophy. the
cases.
EXTRAORAL
aid
a of
minutes)
this
to
obtaining
is
orthodontic
and
Stress
application,
on
to
30
mechanism.
stable
or
versatility
step-by-step effect
practical
Rosenstein
purpose
edgewise
the the
Mechanism
W.
(Running
of
treatment the
University.
Edgewise
Sheldon
of Emphasis
and of
results
Louis
technique demonstrate
treatment.
projections
at Saint
The
a
is to
contraindications,
appliance. work
becomes
sequence
them
II,
light
R. Lokar, time:
1 Malocclusion
with
174-67
Technique
Dearborn, 50
treatment mechanism
Division Wire
Mich.
minutes] objectives may
vary.
for This
Class sequence
II
therapy illustrates
are
essentially the
use
similar, of
low-friction
to
accomsliding
yokes
for
distal
driving.
Maxillary
second
molar
extraction
problems
will
also
be
dis-
cussed.
Treatment Extraction
of a Class I Malocclusion Requiring of Four Premolars 172-67
Richard
B. Manning,
(Running
time:
Helical
loop
Continuous ously,
are
appliances
root
in
David
J.
in
interferences
Treatment
Neuromuscular
problems.
objectives
simultane-
continuous
changes
Loyola-Jarabak
without
technique
visible principles.
Canada
treatment
procedure
using
implications
helical
are
spring
appliances
elucidated,
and
is
removal
of
minutes)
of
selected
of
cases
helical the
Loyola-Jarabak
Light-Wire
Appliances
175-67
Calif.
of
spring
malocclusion
application
of
and
is described
appliances
with
the
Loyola-Jarabak
illustrated
conventional
in
twin
this
edgewise
principles.
TECHNIQUE
William
Technique H. Oliver,
(Running The
with
Mateo,
60
demonstrates
Labio-Lingual time:
65
Tenn.
minutes] technique,
Technic,
and
109-63
Nashville,
labio-lingual
Labio-Lingual
is
twin-wire
with
basic
presented,
labial
with
appliances
principles special
are
as
advocated
emphasis
on
in
the
Dr.
Oliver’s
occlusal
text,
guide
plane.
demonstrated.
TECHNIQUE
Intervention According
and Treatment of Malocclusion to Dr. Charles H. Tweed’s Principles
C. Homer
Garson,
(Running
time:
Because
of
bone mixed all
Los Angeles, 32
the
possible
Mixed Dentition, Concepts 161-67
Calif.
minutes) many
discrepancy
ramifications and
dentition
in the and
is quite
of
tooth
material,
involved.
An
conditioning
factors.
growth and
attempt
Complete
trends, the will
variations
persistence be
treatment
made of
in of
to two
the
habits,
explain different
amount
of
treatment the
in
elimination
types
of
cases
be shown.
The
Tweed
Philosophy
L. Levern
Merrifield,
(Running
time:
This under
Dealing San
use
LABIO-LINGUAL
ing
Ontario,
and
time:
The
bracket
will
and
applying
discrepancy
treatment
II Cases with 173-67
sequence.
treatment
sequence.
of
arch-length
minutes]
Aspects
(Running
the
in several
Rapid
achieved
discipline
H. Roth,
The
basal
use
is illustrated.
Ronald
TWEED
be
Islington,
27
this
widest
accomplishing
Treatment in Class and Deep Overbite
time:
diagnostic
described
their
sequence.
may
Mitchell,
(Running
this
dentin
Nonextraction Broken Contacts
Round
find forces,
illustrated to
Pa.
minutes)
low-magnitude
damage
A
Devon,
30
50
is a technique
course
directed
the
auspices
of
Treating
Ponca
of
Protrusion
Malocclusions
1 SO-66
Okla.
minutes) and
by
Bimaxillary
City,
Dr. the
treatment Charles Charles
procedure H. H.
Tweed Tweed
as given and
Dr.
Foundation.
and L. Levern
demonstrated Merrifield.
at the This
teach-
course
is
388
Audio-Visucxl The
Tweed
Walter
Technique
(Running
time:
sequence
occlusion,
utilizing
correction
of
Memphis,
40
Tenn.
minutes)
describes the
the
J. Orthodontics A$%-42 1969
134-65
C. Sandusky,
This
Am.
Libmry
the
Tweed
molar
correction
of
method
of
relationship
a
low-FMIA-angle
Class
diagnosis
and
extraoral
anchorage
with
II,
treatment.
In
Division
this
precedes
1 mal-
patient, the
full
early banded
technique.
TWIN-WIRE
TECHNIQUE
Pitfalls
with
Claude (Running The are
shown.
This
time:
sectional
efficient
The
theory, (2)
The
systems
are
of
tooth
35
control,
of Helical
(including
and
the
torquing
cases.
Application
spring
designs
use
of
springs)
make
these
modifi-
of
Spring
of
(1) and
canine, (3)
central,
bodily
for
and
en
root
masse
movement root
move-
movement.
171-67
Appliances
III.
minutes) of
analytical
mechanics
Moments
time:
127
and
and
application
couples
are
Tooth
Movement
of
discussed,
these
and
principles
the
various
are force
the
light
the
of
Dr.
Kaare
Practice,
by T. M.
A
of
Study
time:
discusses
number of
62
of
the
latest
Reitan
of
the
tissue
questions Oslo,
of
histologic
changes great data.
Norway,
and
that
occur
importance
to
Illustrations from
the
with the
are text,
varying
Forces Ponca
minutes)
City,
largely
Orthodontic
186-68 Okla.,
and
James
J. Cross,
Ardmore,
types
orthodontist
Graber.
Directional
Merrifield,
102-63
minutes)
A
in
Orthodontic
III.
sequence
movement.
L. Levern
of
Kenilworth,
slide-tape
[Running
extraction
activation are
and
Principles
Graber,
work
proper
included
sequence.
discussed
and
of
appliance
uprighting
illustrated.
(Running This
Johnson
Ind.
and
Chicago,
this
Biomechanical T. M.
basic
treatment
headings
principles in
the
minutes]
Mechanics time:
illustrated
appliance
115-64
anchorage,
Indianapolis,
60
E. Fizzell,
(Running
of
the
measurement
Relevant
an
cases.
fabrication,
Basic
James
mechanism
good
113-63
Topic
force
twin-wire as
MOVEMENT
time:
presented.
the
is just
be.
Technique
extraoral
for
J. Burstone,
[Running
ment,
and
Movement
Charles
it should
Wire
in using
twin-wire
minutes)
in clinical
ROOT
the
Tenn.
modifications
appliance
AND
“as”
Twin-Arch
60
encountered that
and
Memphis,
palatal
is shown
Root
are
“when”
and
arches,
pitfalls
demonstrates
Johnson
[Running
TOOTH
mechanical
N. Weber,
Adaptations
139-66 Canada
minutes)
if applied
Faustin
Mechanism Quebec,
sequence
A Modified
it an
45
common
other
cations
Twin-Wire Montreal,
time:
most
as any
the
Baril,
Okla.
taken
are from
Principles
This sequence discusses the all-important question of the direction of forces and the correlation with treatment results. Much has been written of force amounts, but too little attention has been paid to force direction in headgear use and in elastics. The authors show that certain types of headgear produce unfavorable occlusal plane changes which can be prevented by proper design and use of both extraoral and intraoral appliances. Torque and Its Application in Orthodontics Erman D. Rauch, Joplin, MO. (Running time: 45 minutes)
166-67
One of the most important treatment objectives is root movement, particularly of the anterior teeth and teeth adjacent to extraction spaces. Yet, paradoxically, the accomplishment of this objective is difficult and time consuming. This sequence describes the principles behind torque and illustrates the mechanism for efficient achievement. Orthodontic Prescription: Rx Force Sam Weinstein, Lincoln, Neb. (Running time: 45 minutes) An explanation and analysis on tipping and bodily movements any tooth movement is discussed. sizing the ability of the orthodontist terns in the P.D.L. and bone, free TREATMENT
OF
CLASS
II
169-67
of
forces, moments, and couples and their implications is presented. The importance of centers of rotation in A series of malocclusion problems is presented, emphato control location of centers of rotation, stress patbodily analysis, reactionary forces, etc.
CASES
Ramification of the Class Allan G. Brodie, Chicago, (Running time: 50 minutes]
II Problem III.
157-66
This presentation traces the evolution of orthodontic thinking on the Class II malocclusion (Angle] and the etiologic factors that seem to be responsible for it. It begins with the early efforts at classification of malocclusion and relates the series of investigations that have been directed at testing many of the factors that have been advanced as causes. Some of these are relative size of jaws, tooth-jaw relations, variations among head parts, musculature, and neuromuscular adaptations. The Management of Class II, Joseph R. Jarabak, Hammond, (Running time: 80 minutes)
Division Ind.
2 Type
This slide-narration sequence opens with tors. Then follows the case analysis, statement derly outline of efficient appliance arrangement necessary retention needs are described, with bration.
Malocclusion
125-65
a brief discussion of genetic and local facof objective, and treatment plan. An oris demonstrated in a case report. The a short discussion of posttreatment equili-
Correction of Maxillary Protrusion by Ostectomy Phelps J. Murphey and Robert V. Walker, Dallas, (Running time: 45 minutes)
with Texas
Orthodontic
Therapy
138-66
The correction of severe Class II, Division 1 malocclusion is difficult to achieve by orthodontic or surgical methods alone. Treatment of such a malocclusion and the concomitant facial disharmony previously has been considered unpredictable when approached from a strictly surgical or orthodontic standpoint. The basic principles relative to mandibular ostectomy for the correction of maxillary protrusion accompanied by man-
dibular
retrognathia
malocclusion corrective and
working Case
Analysis
J. A.
Salzmann,
types
of
of
A
II,
(Running
the
various
1 plans
are
and
Technique
45
types
a
early to
geometric
working
arch
form,
is made.
Division
1 Malocclusion
is most
analysis
of
frequently
the
127-65
is
caused
principal
presented,
abnormalities.
showing The
by
differences
failure
to
in eight relationships
differences
and
make
different between
similarities
are
summarized. Early
Treatment
appliance, retainers
effective
dentition.
discrepancies
parts.
“Extraoral
clinically
natural
of
Class
first
which a
clinically
Retention,” to
reduce
and
II
concerns employs
153-66
Malocclusion
use
of
useful
adjunct the
possibility
in use of
headgear
relapse.
II that
a physiologic The
headgear The
Class
contention
dysplasias.
orthodontic of
the
create
various forces.”
skeletal
on
craniofacial
“controlled
concerns
treating
placed
retention
osseous the
of is
subsequent of
the
method
Emphasis
reductions The
appliance
of
of
evaluating
and
N. Y.
mixed
tooth
in three
COSLA
II,
for
study
minutes)
the of
edgewise
called
for
Yonkers,
outlines
conducive
Class
malocclusion
treatment
reduction
an
An dental
in
splint
II malocclusions
and
malocclusions
predetermination
occlusal of
technique
photographs,
N. Y.
Class
Division
time:
is presented
Types
planned
oriented
minutes)
profile,
technique
vironment
an
York,
G. Spengeman,
This
includes
work-up,
diagnosis.
Rationale
Walter
part,
60
treated
Class and
early
Eight
A carefully
It
which
New
facial,
stressed
of
of
differential
skeletal,
with
from
time:
Relapse
demonstrated.
developed.
roentgenographic
casts
proper
be
been
casts,
(Running
a
will
has
in conjunction
second
is a discussion
treatment. in
enmaterial
conjunction
The
third with