Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 5 (1983/1984) 15--26 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam -- Printed in The Netherlands
THE A N T I B O D Y - C O N T A I N I N G LYMPH
FOLLOWING
ANTIGEN K.J.
INTRAPERITONEAL
IN DIFFERENT
BEH 1
and
CELL RESPONSE
A.K.
15
IN HEPATIC AND INTESTINAL
AND INTRAVENOUS
ADMINISTRATION
LASCELLES 2
ICSIRO Division of Animal Health, McMaster Laboratory, Bag No. I, P.O., Glebe, N.S.W. 2037, Australia 2CSIRO Division of Animal Health, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (Accepted
19 January
OF
ADJUVANTS
Private
Bag No.
Private
i, P.O.,
1983)
ABSTRACT Beh, K.J. and Lascelles, A.K., 1983. The antibody-containing cell response in hepatic and intestinal lymph following intraperitoneal and intravenous administration of antigen in different adjuvants. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 5: 15-26.
A comparison was made of the antibody-containing cell (ACC) response in hepatic and intestinal lymph of sheep following intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin in Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA), Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA) or the bland vegetable oil preparation, adjuvant 65. There was a substantial ACC response in intestinal lymph following intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin in either FCA or FIA. Responses were e s s e n t i a l l y similar in magnitude and for both adjuvants ACC were distributed mainly among the IgGl, IgA and IgM immunoglobulin classes. In contrast, there was a negligible ACC response in intestinal lymph following injection of antigen in adjuvant 65. The output of ACC in hepatic lymph and the immunoglobulin class distribution of the ACC following intraperitoneal injection of antigen in either FCA or FIA were similar and results were comparable with those for intestinal lymph with ACC of IgA specificity comprising 32% of ACC at the peak of the response. In contrast to results for intestinal lymph, injection of antigen in adjuvant 65 was followed by a significant ACC response mainly of IgGl-and IgM-specific cells in hepatic lymph. The ACC response was much smaller in magnitude than with the Freund's adjuvants. Intravenous injection of ovalbumin in FIA or adjuvant 65 gave rise to substantial ACC responses in hepatic lymph which contrasted with the barely detectable response in intestinal lymph. Following intravenous administration the great majority of ACC in hepatic lymph were of the IgM class irrespective of adjuvant used although ACC of the IgA class made a transitory appearance.
0165-2427/83/$03.00
© 1983 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
16
INTRODUCTION Previous
studies have shown that the route of a d m i n i s t r a t i o n
of antigen
markedly
containing
cell
Subcutaneous (FCA)
5% of the ACC
in a vigorous
immunization
in intestinal,
It was suggested
part
of antigen
(Beh et al.,
In the present
of
However, component
(FIA),
introduced lymphoid
diaphragmatic
the possibility
some
65, which
hypothesis
is a n o n - i r r i t a n t
lymph
that some of the a n t i g e n / a d j u v a n t
lymphatic a p p a r a t u s
cavity
and entry 1970).
the
into the general
(Yoffey and Cortice,
lymph following
stimulated
by way of the
were also carried out to determine
emulsion.
in afferent
The results of these studies
into the p e r i t o n e a l
intestinal
in FCA,
are emulsions
To study the origin of the response
system following a b s o r p t i o n
of a n t i g e n / a d j u v a n t
following
incorporated
circulation
and
also
in the FCA plays
experiments in h e p a t i c
the
lamina propria or Peyers
the ACC response was m e a s u r e d
led to the tentative
hepatic
lymph
that the irritancy of
both of which
or adjuvant
oil preparation.
from the liver and gall bladder.
emulsion
hepatic and coelic
intestines of sheep
injection of o v a l b u m i n
lymph
in FCA gave
class s p e c i f i c i t y of the ACC.
irritant mineral oil,
in hepatic
On the
of ovalbumin
study a comparison was made of the ACC response
incomplete adjuvant
vegetable
in the
less than
the nature of the immune response with regard
from the liver and
intraperitoneal Freund's
response
of the serosa allowing
1979).
to the i m m u n o g l o b u l i n
in lymph
complete adjuvant
constituting
previously
into intestinal
that the m y c o b a c t e r i a l
in d i r e c t i n g
1980).
18-40% of total ACC at the peak of
FCA may cause a p e r m e a b i l i t y penetration
exists
in Freund's
IgG-ACC and IgM-ACC
IgA-ACC constituted
the response.
patches
(Beh & Lascelles,
in lymph at the peak of the response.
intraperitoneal
to an ACC response
in which
in lymph
lymph with ACC of the IgA class
other hand, rise
the nature of the antibody-
injection of o v a l b u m i n
resulted
popliteal
influenced
(ACC) response
Accordingly, the ACC response
intravenous
injection
17 MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Animals One kept
to two-year-old
in m e t a b o l i s m
Merino wethers were
cages and offered
used.
Sheep were
feed and water ad libitum.
Antigen Crystalline Chemical
Co.,
ovalbumin
(grade V) was obtained
St. Louis,
Miss.
from the Sigma
U.S.A.
Adjuvant FCA and FIA were obtained antigen
mixture
Hilleman
was prepared using
et al.,
comprising
from the Difco.
65
the method described
by
1972, and consisted
50% aqueous ovalbumin
The vehicle
Adjuvant
consisted
of a water
solution
of 86% peanut
oil,
in oil emulsion
and 50% oil vehicle. 10% arlacel A and 4%
a l u m i n i u m monostearate. Enumeration
of ACC
The number of ACC and the
immunoglobulin
antibody
was determined
outlined
by Beh and Lascelles
this
involved
sequential
tetramethylrhodamine labelled
recover
Cannulation
followed
(1961).
determined 16 days. emulsion,
injection
emulsified
Outputs
Briefly, smears with
and fluorescein
of intestinal
procedures
described
Sheep were allowed before
receiving
to
by of
in an equal volume of FCA, FIA or adjuvant cells and ACC
on fresh samples of lymph collected In the sheep receiving prior cannulation
of ovalbumin
and by
1-2 days
5 ml of a i0 mg/ml solution
of large basophilic
using a polyvinylchloride solution
of cytocentrifuge
anti-ovalbumin
from the effects of surgery
intraperitoneal 65.
ducts
and Morris
ovalbumin
to p r o c e d u r e s
(1977).
reagents.
lymphatics:
lymphatic
Lascelles
according
and Beh
of
procedure
(a) Efferent hepatic
spreads
(1974)
staining
labelled
antiglobulin
Experimental
in cell
class specificity
intravenous
in lymph were daily
for the next
antigen/adjuvant
of the jugular vein was carried out
catheter.
emulsified
Five ml of a 10 mg/ml
in an equal volume
of either FIA
18 or adjuvant catheter during
65 were
into
which
the
slowly
introduced
sheep.
both
the
Two
days
intestinal
by way of the
later
and
sheep
hepatic
jugular
underwent
lymphatic
surgery
ducts
were
cannulated.
(b) A f f e r e n t located One
near
or two ducts
(0.5mm
I.D.,
hepatic
lymphatics:
the hepatic were
was
slow was
injection
of a n t i g e n / a d j u v a n t an ACC
with
carried
out
ducts
were
to the portal
a polyvinylchloride
lymph
and cannulated
surgery
hepatic
adjacent
Because
3-4 days,
to observe
node
cannulated
0.9mm O.D.).
ducts
Afferent
lymph
flow
ducts
4-5 days
mixture
vein. cannula
from afferent
usually after
reducing
blocked
after
intrperitoneal
the
time
required
response.
RESULTS
ACC in intestinal lymph following o v a l b u m i n in various a d j u v a n t s The
output
peritoneal adjuvant was
of ACC
injection
output
of antigen
or sixth
eighth The
of o v a l b u m i n
illustrated
a substantial
fifth
in intestinal
injection
65 is
in FCA
ACC
output of blast
It can
in intestinal
or FIA.
which
The and
around
in lymph was
cells,
i.
injection
following
incorporated
injection
comprised
in ACC
lymph
in Fig.
of ACC
day after
day when
increase
intraperitoneal
intra-
in FCA,
FIA or
be seen
that
response
3% of
with
there
following began
a peak
total
associated
for FIA was
the
lymph
reached
of
cells an
on the
on the in lymph.
increase
less p r o n o u n c e d
in
than
for
a meagre
ACC
FCA. The
injection
of adjuvant
65 was
in lymph with
peak
observed
with
adjuvants
(lower
of blast
cells.
was
no change The
of antigen
for FCA,
lymph for
stained
IgG2.
cells
in output
immunoglobulin
injection that
Freund's
for IgGl,
0.9%
On the day prior The
intraperitoneal
of ACC
specificity (Fig.
and at the peak
predominated.
following
class in FIA
levels
followed
response
2) was
of the for
than
5% of those
graph,
Fig.
i) and
of the ACC
IgM and 0.8%
of ACC
injection
the same
1% of cells for IgA,
of the ACC in the
of adjuvant
there
following
essentially
response
to the peak
number
by only
less
with
response
intestinal 65 was
as
in none IgA
lymph
too low
19 for an accurate
determination
of immunoglobulin
class
distribution.
Complete Freund's adjuvant 110
I
80 70 6O 50 30 2O 10 o
x
Incomplete Freund's adjuvant
ul
E
c -c ~ ~.,
70 60 5O 40
.Q
~
20 10
_
0
0
I
*
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
"5
~Q3
Adjuvant 65
:
I
-
-
-
i
i
T
I
i
I
I
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ? 8 91011121314516 Time after intraperitoneal injection(days) Fig. i. Output of ACC in intestinal lymph following intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin emulsified in FCA (3 sheep), FIA (4 sheep) of adjuvant 65 (4 sheep). Plotted points are mean outpt/h x 10 -5 ~ SE.
20
"~ 5"5
:ic lymph
u
uo
l-
~D
o 5.0 E /.,'5 -" 0 4-0 o
3.5
_~
3"0
<
u
~
2.5
~
2.0
r-
~j
~,, 1-5
Y/
0
~¢-
10
o 0"5 "~ 0
0
567891012 14 789101112 78910 Time after intraperitoneal injection(days)
Fig. 2. D i s t r i b u t i o n of ACC a m o n g s t v a r i o u s i m m u n o g l o b u l i n c l a s s e s in i n t e s t i n a l lymph f o l l o w i n g i n t r a p e r i t o n e a l injection of o v a l b u m i n e m u l s i f i e d in FIA and in h e p a t i c lymph f o l l o w i n g intraperitoneal i n j e c t i o n of a n t i g e n in FIA or a d j u v a n t 65. E a c h c o l u m n r e p r e s e n t s m e a n ACC o u t p u t e x p r e s s e d as a p e r c e n t a g e of total l y m p h o c y t e s in lymph. :
IgG 1 - ACC
:
IgM
- ACC
:
IgA
- ACC
21 ACC in hepatic lymph following intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin in various adjuvants The output of ACC in hepatic lymph following intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin incorporated in FCA, FIA or adjuvant 65 is illustrated in Fig. 3.
The outputs of ACC following injection of
Complete Freund's adjuvant
50 40 30 20 10 ~"
O~
x
~ :
.
,
. . . . . . . . .
Incomplete greund's adjuvant
~ 7o i~ 6o so
? 40 30 20
0
o
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Time after intraperitoneal injection (days)
Fig. 3. Output of ACC in efferent hepatic lymph following intraperitoneal injection of ovalbumin emulsified in FCA (3 sheep), FIA (4 sheep) or adjuvant 65 (4 sheep). Plotted points are mean output/h x 10 -5 ~ SE.
22 antigen
in FIA approached
same as that obtained antigen much
in FCA,
but the response
smaller magnitude.
ACC comprised days after reached cells
those
5.6% of cells
the injection.
in lymph.
injection of antigen
injected with adjuvant
injection when they comprised
to the Freund's
In addition,
there was a substantial
in hepatic
whereas
only a small
adjuvant The
lymph which
in sheep
closely
increase
injected with antigen increase
followed
followed
adjuvants was
in blast
the ACC response,
injection of antigen
in
65.
immunoglobulin
following adjuvant
class s p e c i f i c i t y of ACC
intraperitoneal 65 is presented
injection of ovalbumin
in Fig.
2.
in FIA resulted
in hepatic
in a substantial
antisera.
lymph staining with
At the peak of the ACC response,
stained
for IgA,
results
have been reported p r e v i o u s l y
intraperitoneal
1.4% for IgG 1 and 2.1%
immunization with FCA
in hepatic
IgA-specific
1.8% of total cells
for IgM.
for hepatic
Similar lymph following
(Beh and Lascelles,
1982).
only a small number ACC of the IgA class were
lymph of adjuvant
these animals ACC were either predominance
lymph
in PIA and
It can be seen that
of ACC
On the other hand,
in hepatic
injection of ovalbumin
proportion
found
65, ACC 2.2% of
feature of the adjuvant 65
the responses
its short duration.
cells
in FIA,
in lymph at the peak of the response 9 In sheep
in Freund's
adjuvants
the
injection of
to adjuvant 65 was clearly of
The most striking
compared with
lymph and were
lymph following
Following
a peak 7 days after
response
for intestinal
for hepatic
65-injected
animals.
In
IgM- or I g G l - s p e c i f i c with a
of the latter.
Source of ACC in hepatic lymph The hepatic response may have arisen as a result of stimulation
of lymphoid cells
bladder
lamina propria
through
the serosa.
peritoneal
cavity
diaphragmatic response
Moreover,
antigen absorbed
from the
into the blood stream by way of the
lymphatic vessels would
in the hepatic
A t t e m p t s were made experiments.
in the liver or biliary and gall
following direct p e n e t r a t i o n of antigen
lymph node
be expected
to induce a
following uptake by the liver.
to study these p o s t u l a t e s
in the following
23
(a) ACC bladder
in afferent hepatic lymph:
One of 3 sheep whose gall
lymph was studied gave a small response
intraperitoneal injection,
a d m i n i s t r t i o n of antigen
0.14% of cells
In afferent
following
in FIA.
On day 8 after
in lymph were ACC.
lymph originating
from the liver,
3/4 sheep had an
ACC response with a mean of 0.014% ACC present on day 8. were detected permit
IgA-ACC
in these sheep but responses were too small to
an accurate estimation of the isotype d i s t r i b u t i o n of ACC.
(b) ACC in efferent hepatic and intestinal intravenous of each
injection:
immunoglobulin
lymphocytes ovalbumin
in hepatic
Table
lymph following
I presents
the numbers of ACC
class expressed
as a percentage
lymph following
intravenous
in either FIA or adjuvant 65.
TABLE
of total
injection of
It can be seen that there
I
I m m u n o g l o b u l i n class specificity of ACC in hepatic lymph at various times following i n t r a v e n o u s injection of ovalbumin emulsified in either FIA (3 sheep) or adjuvant 65 (2 sheep). The number of ACC of each immunoglobulin class in lymph was expressed as a percentage of total lymphocytes. Values presented are means + S.E.
Days after ACC class specificity
Adjuvant
6
intravenous
injection
7
8
9
i0
Incomplete
IgG 1
0
0
0.13~0.13
0.01~0.01
0
Freund's
IgG 2
0
0
0.04~0.04
0
0
Adjuvant
IgA
0
0.06
0.03
0.01
0
0.3
0.57
0.44
0.04
0
Adjuvant
65
IgG 1
0.04~0.04
0.08~0.08
0
0
0
IgG 2
0
0
0.01
0
0
IgA
0.02+0.01
0.04+0.02
0.18+0.16
0.02+0.02
0
IgM
0.36+0.36
0.26+0.18
0.07+ 0
0
0
24 was a substantial antigen
for adjuvant after
output of ACC
in hepatic
in either adjuvant with responses 65.
Responses
for both adjuvants
injection and reached peak
comprised injected
sheep.
in intestinal
antigen
5-6 days
there was only a meagre ACC
in one of 3 sheep which
received
in FIA intravenously.
It also can be seen from Table were
commenced
in lymph for FIA and adjuvant 65-
In marked contrast, lymph
injection of
levels at 6-7 days when ACC
0.6% and 0.4% of cells
response
lymph after
for FIA larger than those
of the IgM class
I that the great majority of ACC
irrespective of the adjuvant
of the IgA class were well represented injection of adjuvant
on one day
used,
but ACC
(day 8) after
65.
DISCUSSION The large standard errors variation was
for the ACC outputs were due to
in the tempo of the response
a 1-2 day variation
The
a particular
either
in intestinal
injection of antigen
the irritancy of the adjuvant allowing
presence
injection
of antigen
lymph following
intraperitoneal
in adjuvant 65, although
lymph.
intraperitoneal adjuvants was
In contrast
to results
injection of antigen
important
to stress that d i f f e r e n c e s lymph were
the Freund's
for
in hepatic
incorporated
the response was of considerably
than was observed with and hepatic
that the
influence on the
there was a significant ACC response
magnitude intestinal
that
of the serosa
to both FCA and FIA were similar
and qualitatively.
lymph,
following
following
of ACC in intestinal
in either of the Freund's
responses
quantitatively intestinal
in hepatic
in
into the lamina propria or
in FCA has a significant
class d i s t r i b u t i o n
The ACC response
substantial;
lymph
The results rule out any suggestion
of m y c o b a c t e r i a
immunoglobulin
in sheep
the hypothesis
increased p e r m e a b i l i t y
direct p e n e t r a t i o n of antigen patches.
sheep
incorporated
of antigen with adjuvant 65 supports
there
the same.
FCA or FIA and the absence of the response
Peyer's
Thus
response
treatment was e s s e n t i a l l y
intraperitoneal
injection
lymph
but the overall
similarity of the ACC responses
following
sheep.
in the time at which different
e x h i b i t e d maximal ACC responses, receiving
between
lower
adjuvants.
in response between
sensitively
tested
in the
It is
25
experiments
reported as in most animals both hepatic and
intestinal ducts were cannulated
allowing within animal comparisons
to be made for individual adjuvants. lymph of sheep receiving antigen smallness of its IgA component, class were observed.
The ACC response
peritoneal
for the
while many ACC of IgG 1 and IgM
It was considered
that antigenic stimulation
of the hepatic lymphoid system with this non-irritant have arisen
in hepatic
in adjuvant 65 was notable
adjuvant may
indirectly by transfer of antigen/oil emulsion from the cavity into the bloodstream followed by its uptake from
the blood passing through the liver. vegetable oil emulsion
The rapid disappearance
from the peritoneal
of
cavity supported this
proposition.
No trace of adjuvant 65 emulsion could be found in
the peritoneal
cavity of sheep at post-mortem conducted two weeks
after injection. The proposal was further supported by the results of experiments injected
in which ovalbumin
intravenously,
in FIA and adjuvant 65 were
when there was a substantial ACC response
in hepatic lymph, predominantly of IgM specificity. there was a moderate transitory the adjuvant 65-injected
IgA response,
sheep.
Presumably
However,
especially
in one of
blood-borne antigen
was taken up by Kupffer cells lining the sinusoids of the liver and antigen then transferred were found in abundance intravenous
injection of ovalbumin
of the IgA-ACC response ovalbumin
to the hepatic
lymph node where ACC
following either intraperitoneal following
in adjuvant. intraperitoneal
or
The predominance injection of
in FIA, contrasting with the strong IgM response
animals receiving
the same material
intravenously,
in
suggests that
serosal penetration of antigen favours IgA stimulation,
although
this is not entirely borne out by results for afferent hepatic lymph.
26 REFERENCES Beh, K.J.,
1977.
The origin of IgA-containing
lymph of sheep. Beh, K.J.,
Husband,
response
in intestinal
55: 263-274.
A.J.
1979.
and Lascelles,
of sheep to intraperitoneal
Immunology, Beh, K.J.
cells
Aust. J.exp.Biol.med. Sci., A°K.,
Intestinal
immunization.
37: 385-388.
and Lascelles,
intracellular
A.K,
and surface
and intestinal
1974.
Class specificity of
immunoglobulin
lymph from sheep.
of cells
in popliteal
Aust.J.exp. Biol.med. Sci.,
52: 505-514. Beh, K.J.
and Lascelles,
administration response Hilleman, Stokes,
1981.
M.R., Woodhour, J., 1972. A.K.
The effect of route of
of antigen on the antibody-containing
in lymph of sheep.
Ann. Allergy, Lascelles,
A.K.,
Immunology,
A°, Friedman,
The clinical
A., Weibel,
Physiol., J.M.
R.E.
and
application of adjuvant 65.
30: 152-157. and Morris,
B.,1961.
Surgical
collection of lymph from unaenaesthetized Yoffey,
cell
42: 577-582.
techniques
sheep.
Q.J.
for the exp.
46: 199-205. and Courtice,
lympghomyeloid
complex.
F.C.,
1970.
Lymphatics,
Academic Press,
London.
lymph and the pp.942.