THROMBOSIS RESEARCH 29; 333-341, 1983 0049-3848/83/030333-09$03.00/O Printed in the USA. Copyright (c) 1983 Pergamon Press Ltd. All rights reserved.
THE APPLICATION
OF POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL TO RADIOIMMUNOASSAYS USED IN HAEMOSTASIS
8.
J.
Haemostasis Royal
Free
Woodhams Unit,
and
F.8.P..
Department
Hospital
,
London
Kernoff, of
tiaematology, England
NW3 ZQG,
Accepted by Editor C.R.M. Prentice. (Received 25.8.1982. Received in final form by Executive Editorial Office 22.11.1982)
fiBSTRACT Use
of
polyethylene
antibody
glycol
6000
radioimmunoassays
in
for
the
secc.nd
stages
fibrinopeptide
A,
of
double
B-thromboglobulin
and platelet factor 4 facilitates the more rapid separation and allows precipitating antiserum free from bound antigen, At a final PEG 6000 concentration used in greater dilution.
of to be of
of free from bound antigen was complete within s %, separation 1 hour, and antisera couid be used in dilutions 3-g times greater PEG 6000 had a than those recommended by the manufacturers. negligible effect on the affinity of first stage antibodies for their respective antigens. Radioimunoassays using PEG 6000 were failure to adjust standards to sensitive to protein concentration, similar artefactcal
protein ly
concentrations low results.
as
those
of
test
samples
causing
I NTRODUCTI ON An essential from bound
step antigen.
precipitate
in
all radioimmunoassays Separation methods
antigen-antibody
absence of the antigen non-specific precipitation However , double antibody expensive step
of
and the
High molecular antigen-antibody from solution
Key
Words:
complexes
to
techniques - it
require
glycol, in,
have
is overnight
weight polyethylene interactions (1) (2).
Polyethylene B-thromboglobul
have
not
the
disadvantages for
(PEG) is precipitation
radicimmunoassay, platelet factor
333
advantages,
the
known
of second
free tc
of the sulphate.
being precipitation
to enhance both of macromolecules
fibrinopeptide 4.
of
including
charcoal, and avoidance such agents as ammonium
unusual incubation.
glycol and the
is the separation a second antiserum
several
stripping caused by associated with
time-consuming
assay
(RIAs) which use
A,
334
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL IN R.I.A.
In this RlAs assay
study
used time
we
have
evaluated
in haemostasis, by increasing
the assay. which utilises
The
assays a first
the higher molecular (BTG and PF4), which
the
with the the speed studied stage
weight
use of PEG 6000 in three dcuble antibdy particular objective of shortening overall of precipitation in the second stage of
were an antiserum antigens
utilise
rabbit
haptanic raised
of
FPA:
Rabbit
in
RIA for rabbits;
fibrinopeptide and two
B-thromboglobulin and
goat
MATERIALS Radioimmunoassay
Vo1.29, No.3
and
antisera,
A(FPA), for
RlAs
platelet
factor
4
respectively.
AND METHODS
anti-human
FPA antiserum,
desaminotyrosyl
FPA
(DATFPA), and FPA standard were obtained from IMCO Limited, Stockholm,Sweden, and prepared for use as previously described (3). Anti-FPA antiserum was used at a dilution of 1 in 128o. Apart from differences in the method of separation of free from bound antigen, the assay was performed as previously described (3), first stage incubations normally being overnight at 4’C. Shorter incubations - e.g. 30 mins. at 37’C followed by 15 mins. at 4’C gave similar results. All dilutions for FPA assays were made in 0.05M tris buffer containing O.lM sodium chloride, @.l% sodium azide and 0.1% ovalbumin (TBS ovalbumin, pH 8.5). presented in Tables 2-7 Optimisation ‘Goat
of
anti-rabbit
antiserum. second
The
controls
separation
IgG
stage
according ation with
the
effects
incubation
of
assays were mean values. of
(Sigma)
to the standard al 1 components (tube
All being
was
free
as
out
bound
the
dilutions shown
system
in
duplicate,
FPA antigen
second
stage
concentrations
and
protocol, of the
frcm
used
different
times,
carried
of
results
using
PEG 6000
(Sigma),
of antiserum were studied Table 1, which compared
in present
(tube
PEG 6000:
precipitating
1)
with
a series
separof
2-5). TABLE
1
Tube 1
number
2
3
4
5
.1251-DATFPA
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
TBS ovalbumin
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
Ant i-FPA
0.1
0.1
0.1
-
-
Overnight Precipitating PEG
antiserum
6000
0.1 0.5
TBS Ovalbumin
Volumes of free
(ml) used in bound antigen
incubation -
0.5 c.1
experiments designed using PEG 6000
to
0.1 -
at 0.1
-
0.5
0.5
-
0.1
0.5
optimise
4’C
the
separation
The control tubes were included to check: possible precipitation of 125-lDATFPA-anti-FPA conjugate by PEG 6000 alone (tube 2); possible precipitation of 125-I-DATFPA-anti-FPA conjugate by the precipitating antiserum alone possible precipitation of 125-l DATFPA trapped or bound to the (tube 3);
second DATFPA uged
at
25OOg
before antigen was free
from
30
bound
mins. in
at
was
5% (w/v),
4OC,
counter
a Rackgamma In the final
antigen
precipitating
Separation precipitating
an
accomplished
incubation
antisertim
at
(LKB
version
of
using
period
of
Ltd.). the
were were
25 ml 20 ml
activated Sepharose was O.lM sodium bicarbonate groups were blocked by The Sepharose conjugate
also this
stored as l:g mixture
incubated centrifuged
natant was removed further two times. counted. Separation
of
the
phase
liquid
purposes. assay tune
at
free
0.1 and
temperature,
mixed with 1 ampoule 18 hours at 4’C. for mixing the was then and stored
Langmuir
Assay
of
FPA
from
gel for a further 2hours extensively washed with at 4OC as a 1:l slurry
was
in
using bentonite concentration
bound
FPA antigenusing
PEG 6000:
maximum in
binding
unactivated In the assay,
tube
This
precipitating
method
was
used
and
the
mix-
antiserum for
diluted 1 in 32 was added to each were incubated overnight at 4OC.
tubes
were
and
centrifuged
the
calculated
tubes
from
at
20C0
g for
in
comparative second stage After adding 30
mins.
at
4’C,
counted.
data
obta
i ned
from
standard
curves
(5).
clinical
prepared of
that l:Y
1:l slurry with TBS ovalbumin. was added to each second stage
ml antiserum the mixtures
pl’cts
and
a
of undiluted Any rema i n-
at 4’C. After adding 1 ml TBS ovalbumin, the g for 10 minutes at 4’C, 1 ml of the superand the washing cycle repeated a with a vacuum I ine, After removal of the final supernatant, the tubes k_,ere
without
affinity
using
collected
room
overnight at 200C
the 1 ml TBS ovalbumin, the supernatant aspirated, Antibody
of cf
100.
O.lM sodium bicarbonate and TBS ovalbumin, Preliminary experiments indicated with TBS ovalbumin. was obtained wher. the Sepharose conjugate was diluted
tures tubes
bound
concentration
1 hour 1 in
of
separation
free from bound FPA antigen using Sepharose-conjugated antiserum without PEG 6060: This method was used for comparative Sepharose 46 (Pharmacia Ltd.) was activated using cyanogen bromide
CNBr-activated lg L-glycine.
Sepharose, 0.2 ml of
Percentage
assay,
a final
of
a dilution
precipitation of 12.5-lthe tubes were centrifremoved with a vacuum
of
purposes. (CNBr) (4). antiserum in ing with
for
counting calculated.
PEG 6000 of and
and possible 4); After incubation, and the supernatant
phase antiserum by PEG (tube by PEG 6000 alone (tube 5).
1 ine
335
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL T.NR.T.A.
vo1.29, No.3
blood for
samples
assay
as
using
described
PEC 6000:
Blood
by Woodhams
adscrption to remove cross-reacting first stage incubation tubes used
samples
6 Kernoff
fibrinogen. to prepare
were (3))
The protein standard curves
for assay of plasma samples using PEG 6000 was increased by the addition of 0.1 ml 7% ovalbumin or 0.1 ml FPA.-free horse serum, the latter being prepared by bentonite absorption of horse serum foIlo.+ed by extensive dialysis against 0.1 ml saline until no FPA was detectable in an assay using Sepharoseconjugated
antiserum.
Radioimnunoassays
of
BTC and
PF4:
Rabbi t
anti
-human
BTG cnt i serum
.jnd bTJ stan-
dard were a gift from Dr.Duncan Pepper. Reagents were prepared and the BTG assay performed as described by Bolton et al(6),apart from differences in the method of separation of free frcm hound antigen.Goat anti-human PF4antiserum was a gift from Dr.Karen Kaplan. PF4 standard was supplied by Dr.DuncanPepper. 10 ug PF4 was iodinated using 1mCi of carrier-free 125-l (Radiochemical Centre, Amersham, UK) by the method of Hunter & Greenwood (7). The label led PF4 has separated from unreacted 125-l by one passage only through a Sephadex
336
POLYETHYLEXE GLYCOL IN R.I.4.
(1.C x 15 cm). for BTG and PF4 containing C.15M
G25 coium dilutions (pH 7.5)
vo1.29, yo.3
No further purificaticn was performed. Al! assays were made in O.C5M scdium phosphate buffer sodium chloride, C.12 sodium azide, 10 iu/ml
(Weddell) and 2% horse serum, which was also used as porcine mucosai heparin eluart in the preparation of labellec ETG and PF4. First stage incubations in BTG and PF4 assays were overnight at LiGC. Optimal conditions fcr use c,f PEG 6000 in the second stages of both assays were established as described above for the FPA assay, and were similar tc these used in the FPA assay i.e. a f ina 1 PEG 6OOC concentration of 5% and an incubation period of I hour at rcom temperature. In tt-e final version of the BTG assay, the precipitating antiserum (goat anti-rabbit IgG, Sigma, titre 1 in 16) was used at a dilution of 1 in 100. In the PF4 assay, rabbit anti-goat IgG (Sigma, titre
1 in 16) was used at a diluticn of 1 in 150. Separation cf BTG using Sepharose-conjugated antiserum was carried out as for FPA, except that scdiusl phosphate buffer was substituted
free
frcm
described for TBS
bound above cvalbumin
RESULTS Effect of PEG 6000 concentration of seoaration of free frcm bound FFA antigen (Table 2): Within the final concentration range of 1.D - lO.O%, increasinc concentrations cf PEG 6000 caused enhancement of orecioitation Control Lubes of bound antigen (tube 1) with an optimal effect at 5%. showed negligible precipitation.
TABLE
2
-. Final of
Tube
concentration
PEG 6OCO
(w/v)
2
1
nurrbe r 3
4
5
1.0%
14.2
1.6
1.6
2.2
2.1
1.25%
3G.5
2.0
1.6
2.0
1.5
1.5%
39.0
1.5
1.6
2.2
1.5
2.5%
56.9
2.2
1.6
5.1
1.9
5.0/;
c3.e
2.0
1.6
2.c
2.0
10.0%
61.2
3.9
1.6
3.9
3.3
Percentage of bound FPA antigen precipitated using different Experimental design as shown in concentrations of PEG 6000. Table 1. Second stage incubation time 1 hr. at room temper1 : 100. ature. Precipitating antiserum dilution
Effect of precipitating antiserum dilution on separaticn of free from bound FPA antigen (Table 3): Inclusion cf PEG 6000 in the seccnd stage of the assay allaa use of the precipitating antiserum at a higher working dilution (1 in 1CO) than that recommended by the manufacturer for conventional methods cf separation (1 in 32).
Vo1.29,
%.3
337
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL IN X.1.A.
3
TABLE _--
Tube Antiserum
dilution
1
2
3
number 4
5
1 in
32
62.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1 in
SO
62.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1 in
100
69.2
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.G
i
in
150
32.0
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
1 in
200
4.0
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
Percentage
of
antiserum Table Final
Effect antigen
in
bound
FPA antigen
different
dilutions.
1. Second concentration
stage of
precipitated
incubation PEG 6000
time 5%.
of second stage incubation time (Table 4): Using PEG 6000 the
pletion within separation of incubation.
using
Experimental 1 hr.
at
room
on separation >>a>=
the
of
as
shcwn
in
temperature.
free
react
1 hour (tube 1). Without PEG 600C (tube free from bound antigen could be detected
TABLE
precipitating
desiyn
ion
from
bound
reached
FPA
corn-
-
3), very little after 4 hours
4
Incubation (room
time
(hrs)
Tube 1
temperature)
2
3
number 4
5
0.5
57.6
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.6
1 .o
61.5
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.0
62.4
2.0
2.6
2.6
2.0
4.0
61.9
2.0
1.6
1.6
l.P!
Percentage second stage in Table 1. concentration
of
bound
FPA antigen
incubaticn Precipitating of
PEG 6000
precipitated
times. Exper imenta antiserum dilution
using
different
1 des i gn as shown 1 in 100. Final
5%.
Comparison of stanlord curves and affinity ccnstants obtained using PEG and non-PEG methods of separm%f free from bound FPF. antigen (Tables 5 d 6) : The PEG 6000 method of separation was compared tiith two other optimised methods. In the first, precipitating antibodies were conjugated to Sepharose 4e ; in the second, the antiserum was used in the liquid phase. Calibration curves obtained by all three methods were very similar (Table 5), as were
338
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL IN R.I.A.
antibody cause first
affinity alteratior! stagz of
constants
(Table
of binding the assay.
6)
characteristics
TABLE
vo1.29, No.3
indicating that PEG 6000 did between FFF and anti-FPA
not in
the
5
--% BOUND
F”,I II PEG 6000
Sepharcse
63.2
59.0
54.7
0.52
56.7
56.2
45.0
1 .a4
49.2
53.8
36.4
2.05
35.7
38.8
33.5
3.13
29.8
31.6
21.4
4.17
27.8
25.3
20.3
6.25
20.8
17.4
16.8
8.34
15.5
15.8
11.4
2.3
5.0
1.2
pmol s/n1
0
BLANKS
Comparison methods of
of standard separation
curves of free
TABLE
Liquid
Phase
obtained using three different from bound FPA antigen.
6
PEG 6000
Sepharose
Liquid
phase
-
Ka L/M
x
10’
Comparison methods of
Assay
of
FPA
in
4.2
of affinity separation
clinical
plasma
4.5
3.7
constants (Ka) using different of free from bound FPA antigen.
samples
using
PEG 6000:
Initial
application
of the PEG 6000 method to clinical plasma samples produced significantly lower results at low levels (0.5 pmols/ml) than those obtained using Sepharose-conjugated antiserum. The possibility was studied that differences in protein concentrations between assay mixtures containing standards and those containing test samples might be a cause of these lower results. Addition of 0.1 m! of either ovalbumin (70 g/l) or FPA-depleted horse serum to standards used in the PEG 6000 assay caused a shift in the standard curve (Table 7), and produced results which did not significantly differ from those obtained using Sepharose-conjugated antiserum. (Hilcoxon signed rank test,
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL ZN R.I.A.
vo1.29, No.3
68 plasma samples, FPA Within assay coefficient using
PEG 6000
coefficient
was
of
range of
13.4%
(mean
variation
was
standard
O-15 pmols/ml, variation for 1.04
8.8%
TABLE
normal
a single
pmols/ml, (mean
normal
n = 10).
3.18
339
pmols/ml,
deviate
sample Between n = 9).
1.26).
assayed assay
7
% Bound pmol /ml
FPA
No added
With
protein
added
protein
0
83.0
70.7
0.52
77.3
64.8
1.04
69.0
62.1
2.~8
56.0
51.3
3.13
46.4
44.4
4.17
40.4
39.7
6.25
31.2
30.8
8.34
28.4
27.1
Comparison of standard curves obtained with and without addition of ovalbumin. Similar results were obtained using FPA-depleted horse serum as a source of protein.
Application Optimal those of precipitation
of conditions the
the
PEG 6000 for
method
of
separation
BTG and PF4 assays PEG 6000 without
FPA assay. of 125-I-BTG, Precipitating
to
BTG and
PF4
assay:
similar using PEG 6000 were antisertim caused negligible
to
125-I-PF4, or first stage antigen-antibody antisera used without PEG 6000 were unable to complexes. In both cause antigen-antibody precipitation after a 1 hour incubation. antisera could be used 6-g times more dilute than suggested by the assays, As with the FPA assay, manufacturers for conventional methods of separation. the protein concentration of standards was increased by addition of 0.1 ml horse serum when assaying clinical samples. There were no significant differences between plasma BTG levels measured using PEG 6000 and those measured using Sepharose-conjugated antiserum (Wilcoxon signed rank test, 0.28). Affinity 64 samples, BTG range O-200 ng/ml, standard normal deviate constants (Ka) were similar (2.9 and 3.5 x lOlo L/M, respectively). Within assay coefficient was 10.3% (mean
of 76.5
variation ng/ml,
for a single n = 8). Between
sample assay
assayed coefficient
using of
PEG 6000 variation
was 7.2% (mean 57 ng/ml , n = 6). Mean recovery of BTG added to normal plasma in the range 60-2000 ng/ml was 97% (SO 21, n = 7) , with no trend to No comparison of different different recoveries at higher or lower levels. separation methods was made in the PF4 assay, but the range of results on normal plasmas (0.02 - 1.04 pmols/ml, mean 0.47, SD 0.27, n = 21) was similar
to
previously repeated values using other methods of separation assay coefficient of variation for a single sample assayed was 1.5% (mean 1.74 pmols/ml, n = 5). Eetween assay coeff i cwas 8.8% (mean 1.54 pmols/ml, n = 6). nean recovery of
Within (8, 9). using PEG 6000 ient of variation
340
POLYETHYLENE GLYCuL IN R.I.A.
PF4 added to n = 16) with
normal plasma in the no trend tc different
range O-15.5 recoveries
,b-01.29, No.3
pmols/ml at higher
was 112.9:: (SD or lower levels.
30.5,
DISCUSSION How PEG precipitates proteins is poorly understood. It has been suggested that it acts as an inert sponge which, by absorbing solvent, raises the effective concentrations and therefore activities of proteins in the surrounding mi I ieu (2). Larger molecular weight proteins are most sensitive to this effect and will precipitate at lower PEG concentrations. The activity of PEG increases than those used in PEG will antiserum
precipitate (10).
polymers
cause
of
excess
time
RlAs can antiserum.
By
suitably
for
precipitation
addition high
of
in
equally
of
second
applicable
of
disruption
in
to
of
stage
the concentration are expensive and
economy
molecules, and precipitating It had little effect on lack
the
the
RlAs
therefore,
use
based
of on
double
of has
haptens
antiserum.
and
larger
from different of antibodies
for
animal FPA or
equilibria
in
the
of the PEG method Failure to adjust test samples may
of
antibody
assay time - an samples - which
precipitating
antigen/antibody
stages of the assays. The only disadvantage be its sensitivity to protein concentration. to similar protein concentrations as those artefactual ly low results.
significant
of precipitating we have found use
overall clinical
antiserum affinity
the
of
a second
molecular weight in the presence
PEG concentrations,
effective means of shortening when results are needed from
advantage
indicating
without
PEG and other interactions
adjusting
be reduced by increasing However, these reagents
a more factor
PEG appeared
complexes
concentrations, of antigen-antibody
(1).
required also
additional
antigenic sources.
2). At concentrations higher agents such as ammonium sulphate,
of the large molecular weight antibody-antigen-antibody a double antibody RIA can be accelerated without of other components of the assay.
of
PEG to be important the
antigen-antibody
At lower enhancement
antibody
precipitation complexes precipitation The
with polymer size (1, this study, and as with
BTG,
first
appeared standards cause
to
REFERENCES 1.
HELLSING, the
The
K.
antigen
effects
antibody
of
of the Biological Fluids, 2.
ATHA, by
3.
4.
5.
D.H.
and
INGHAMS,
polyethylene
glycols.
WOODHAMS, 6.J. Fibrinopeptide
WILCHEK, affinity
PIWCKARD, conjugates. D.M. Weir
Equilibrium
Chapter
R.N. In: 17.
K.C. J.
as 21,
polymers
measured
579-583,
with
for
enhancement
1974.
Mechanism
of
precipitation
of
Rapid
radioimmunoassay
for
and
C.
Selective
Scientific
1981.
enzyme
Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci., 61,
preparation
of
hapten
Handbook of Experimental Immunology. 3rd Blackwell
proteins 1981.
Thromb. Res. 22, 407-416,
M. and ANFINSEN, chromatography.
dialysis
of
Protides
nephelometry.
Biol. Chem. 250, 121C8-12117,
and KERNOFF, P.B.A. A in human ptasma.
CUATRECASAS, P., purification by 636-643, 1968.
(Ed)
different
reaction
Publications.
London,
edition. 1978.
POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL :N R.I.A.
vo1.29, No.3
6.
BOLTON, A.E., LClDLAM, C.A.; MOORE, S., Three approaches to the radioimmunoassay
Er. J. f?aematol., 33, 233-238, 7.
HUNTER,
\!.M. and
CREEF!WOOD,
human
growth hormone 495-496, 1962.
a.
5.
Preparation
cf
D.S.
and
CASH,
J.D.
B-thrombcglobulin.
1976.
F.C.
high
huran
specific
activity.
iodine-131
labelled
iveture, 194,
The release, distribution DAWES, J., SMITH, R.C., and PEPPER, C.S. and clearance of human B-thrombcglobulin and piatelet factor 4. Thrcmb.
Rea.,
KAPLAN,
K.L.
Platelet 199-202, lc;.
of
PEPPER, of
341
COLLINS,
12, 351-361, and
Factor 1981.
CWEN, 4 as
1573.
J.
Flasma
indices
of
levels platelet
of
D-thromboglobclin
activation
in vivo.
and ~locc?,
W.P. @ARfJARD, G.J.R. and HENNAM, J.F. Factors affecting the choice of separation technique. In: Steroid ~mcunoassay. E.H.D. Cameron, S.G, Hillier, K. Griffiths (Eds.) Alpha Omega Publishing Ltd., Cardiff, Wales, 1975, pp 223-228.
57,