.-fo{~.i s t a b [ l l t ! , ..~ Of ..... d.~,h~@ C~_l,tiS~;:d b y }h-a;: < } x t S t c l l e e o f a u a p a , . t n e s s relation. A r e t h e r e other intere..;tix~g reI~rtions o n the reals which triviaiize i~ the ch'ssieat case, b u t affect the thec~rv of emma!ire in the i n m i t i o n i s f i c case? T h e t o n e of {hese coa}'siderations Ctl~O;"~tq th'-~t we tea~ to a e o n i e c t u r e of non.-axi~:matizah:iliiv, t~owc,,<~,*' t h e r e ']s a n o t h e r side to tim coin: D E Q is n'?t comp!cte, b u t is com:p!cte enou~?h that i,. ¢:. ~heor~cs i~l..e DF!:O+(t.:ag) which descri{:~" ~<;,t o n t y t h e cardina!ity of t/he ......r,c ..... , a~.z~o ~,~a; cardh~alities of posSible e v e u s i ( m s ()[ the t t l l i ~ , ~ e i s e } ~ t h e . e x t e n s i o n s ~.!;~t r>~: in (the l i m i t e d ) p r a c t i c e (afforded b y Sectio,~ 4) we::e q u k e simple. W h i l e ti',~e~>::.'r?iSbt ~,.., several theorie~ of equa!i!gy of the ~:ea?~< dei:cv*!irw o n the notio~:t i-ff re~).k¢ ,.~,, ~.,,~,,'~ {=t,.~,i,,h+,.>..,be. tiu~t there iia~,e . . . . . . a s mi:iar v. i-.,~-.w , - ~~,.,., , ¢,~ CO*tll~IOI'Isill3lh{),org, q hi.rtk ..... .'; ) ........ : . . . . ,' d o [~. a K d p k e modcq o f equalily h'~ w~i:i;:.i=~eve~.v t w o e i e m e n i s m u s t li~ok a l i k e ? W e l l there are q u e s d v n ~ ot liow tmii~rmi:7 ~hev ~ook alike, f l o w bi-unifort:nly they look alike. Etc, If we insist o n s~tfiCi::nt!y auJri-ut~ifor.m, bomo,zm~aitv~ is t h e n u m l ~ r of parameters left small e n o u g h *o obtain a I,iXe,(:y}y x,vhose, e x t e n s i o n s a:re as limited as t h o s e Of D E e ? : ) : i
7
22:i
........
2
.
.
.
f~,.
}.