BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 26, No. 2, 1967
THE
BINDING THE
OF ACTINOMYCIN
NATURE
Richard Gates Norman
Received
site
on DNA
of Cancer
omycin
per
pothesis
Several
are
examined.
for
actinomycin
base
The two-stranded
crab pairs
synthetic
et.
, 1965;
alternate
DNA
(Goldberg,
G is the critical
xc
sites.
residue
sites
et al.,
the sequence
Contribution
No.
the component
as crab
dAT,
which
binding
most
nucleosides
varying
1965).
Thus,
either
around
a G in order
3452
116
at about there for
the results,
only
suggest
binding
1965).
pair
that
1961).
7 base further
to occur,
Gellert, must
be
G rather However,
75 to 25%,
1 per
is some
in native
, 1962;
a CC base
from
bind-
1962 ; Cavalieri
c+&.
(Kersten,
constant
strong
and Felsenfeld,
1963)
for binding
the hy-
with
to occur
(Goldberg,
and Hurwitz,
at one actin-
for
and Reich,
at all
a GG content
is fairly
appear
the ratio
excludes
consistent
Neville,
with
saturates
probably
are
AMD
Smith,
for
is required
Rabinowitz,
not bind
Studies
with
for
of the binding
that with
which
sites
Kahan,
of DNA’s
(Gellert, for
does
Kahan,
than
result
the nature
We find
on one strand
Gellert,
dAT
binding
SITE
Davidson
with
the strong
hypotheses,
binding
in these
known
This
strong
present
a number
DNA
is 1:28,
pairs.
1964;
Since
deals
D (AMD).
a GpG sequence
and Nemchin.
BINDING
and Norman
communication
56 base
ing.
DNA
dAT;
29, 1966
present
that
of AMD
W. Hyman
antenarrius
of CC to AT
OF THE
TO CRAB
and Crellin Laboratories of Chemistry* and W. Church Laboratory of Chemical Biology California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91109
November The
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COhVWNlCATlONS
in
the number pairs
requirement or repulsive
Vol. 26, No. 2, 1967
interactions
(either
the DNA
base
Crab
pairs.
fully
form,
nativ’e
veloped
in this
that
interactions
interest
(1963)
distortion
limit
estimate
of
the amount that
of actinomycin
an alternating
A method
for
the direct
would
DNA,
are
occurs
extend
less
likely
to investigate
low
the binding
with
of this
Widholm,
GC base
in a very
copolymer,
of the GC base
(Davidson,
In this
AT
the preparation
disruption
Laboratory
GpG
chains
is mainly
without
1965).
sequence
actinomycins
and Reich
peptide
by local
for
pairs.
and Wang, steric:
Fuller,
dAT
of GC base
or indirectly
neighboring
of the cyclic
three
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
steric
between
Hamilton,
effect
about
directly
structure)
of binding. steric
BIOCHEMICAL
material
pairs,
Nandi,
pairs
are
has been
de-
Olivera,
sufficiently
rare
so
furthermore,
It therefore
of actinomycin
3%
in its
Jensen,
to be important;
frequency.
about
the
seemed
to native
crab
of
dAT.
Experimental sancer of Smith
(1963)
component buoyant ‘nating are
antenarrius except
called
dAT
(2. 7% CC).
AMD
complex
washed The
studies
solution.
SW39 ml
also
1o-3
M - phosphate,
rpm
for
six hours
tube
contained loat 20°C
et al.
(1965).
pairs
(Widholm,
of the better
Cancer
were
made
by sedimenting
pH 7. pelleting
117
rotor
and Dohme. the DNA-
remaining known
in
amounts
in a carefully
two ml
Salt The
AMD
containing
with
borealis
Sharp,
of free
placed
is an alterits properties
Merck,
20% sucrose.
thereby
1965);
known
were
sulfate
DNA
from
and covered
&I NaCl,
This
a gift
and AMD
The
by the mercury-cesium
ml of solution
of DNA
by the method
out in the cold.
the concentration Three
polyallomer
essentially
carried
separated
D was
and measuring
prepared
were
to those
binding
determined)
bottom
was
Actinomycin
the supernatant (spectrally
steps
3. 5% GC base
similar
Equilibrium
was
of Davidson,
with very
all
dAT
method
copolymer generally
that
crab
density
DNA
of mineral
concentrations was
the AMD-DNA
oil. were
spun
at 42,000
complex.
The
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 26, No. 2, 1967
polyallomer
tubes
were
dripped
two ml of supernatant then
measured
solution
readily tubes
adsorbs
using
to glass
Plots dAT
shown
surfaces
1.
I
The
I
vertical
I
e-
.4
I
.(I AMDf
low
of free
free
a higher plot
nucleotides; The
AMD.
actinomycin
curves
concentration.
of these
data
in the strong
These
values For
was
lengths.
handled
with
poly-
and one site agree crab
well dAT,
per
with
I
f,
DNA
and
is the ratio
of
I
2.4
2.1
1 coordinate
a strong
binding
region
binding
118
reaction
uptake analysis
gives
14 (* 1) nucleotides, reported
is the concen-
binding
by further
A least-squares
the intrinsic
thymus
I I /a
followed
those
calf
CobfNt~ymus0 _
indicate
concentration
AMD
liter.
#
the horizontal
free
mole-’
concentration
coordinate,
1.2 I.6 2.0 x 106 mole liter-’
Fig. to total
to native
Crab dAT i I : ef’ I : A
10 -
tration
and was
and
and Discussion
‘2 -
AMD
AMD
1 and 5 cm path
of actinomycin
in Fig.
I.
bound
free
the bottom,
and pipets.
of the binding
are
one ml from
The
collected.
Results
crab
the side,
by spectrophotometry,
Actinomycin propylene
from
of AMD
at
of a Scatahard
K = 2. 3 (*. 5) X lo6 for
calf
thymus
by Gel1ert.s. constant
at
is
DNA.
(1965). 2. 5 (k.
5) x
106
Vol. 26, No. 2, 1967
-1
mole
liter,
56 base
and there
pairs.
Since
tude
as for calf
dAT
appears
one such
CC) have
site
for
data
neighbor
determined
are:
ApA
DNA’s,
binding
two
CC base
order
There
pairs for
by Schwartz,
on crab
is approximately
Cancer
= 0.0126;
of magnisite
in crab
Trautner,
TpT
or one per
the binding
site.
frequencies
= 0.0127,
nucleotides,
is of the same
typical
strong every
112 (i4)
constant
and other
nearest
been
per
the binding
thymus
binding
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
is one site
to be a typical
The
These
BIOCHEMICAL
dAT.
borealis
dAT
and Kornberg CpA
= 0.0100,
(2.7%
(1962). TpG
=
0.0089;
GpA
= 0.0042,
TpC
= 0.0015;
CpT
= 0.0004,
ApG
= 0.0018;
0.0081;
ApC
= 0.0069;
GpG
= 0.0009,
CpC
= 0.0009;
TpA
= 0. 504; ApT
0.429;
CpG
residues
GpC
a’re followed
a non-G base
= 0.0007;
residue.
G residues these
by non-G;
If there
preceding
From
for
is no correlation
a G residue
Cancer
borealis
if all the binding
sites
that
on the same
adjacent
G’s
these
data,
0. 927 of the G residues
a G and the probability
do not have
data
= 0.0015.
of a base on either
dAT
involve
between
apply
a G residue, strand
are
are
needed
by
the probability
of a
a G, 0.87
exclude
of the
neighbor.
antennarius
to define
=
preceded
side as a nearest
the data
=
0. 939 of the G
following
to Cancer
GpT
If
dAT,
and
the possibility a strong
binding
site. Professor to us.
The
Don Crothers
nearest
0. 64 of the G’s are ceded tides
neighbor followed
prec.eding
frequencies
and following
a purine
as a nearest
neighbor.
consists
of a G plus
an adjacent
of one site
per .Apart
about
assuming
purine
argument
Cancer
show
borealis
and 0. 74 of the G’s no correlation
the G, l-(0. Thus,
out the following
64-O.
that
are pre-
between
the nucleo-
74) = 0. 52 of the G’s have
the assumption is consistent
that a binding with
site
the observation
two G’s. from
the distribution
is random,
for
by a pyrimidine
Thus,
by a pyrimidine.
has pointed
the nearest of CC base
and if E = frequency
neighbor pairs
frequencies, along
of occurrence
119
the chain. of an AT
nothing
is known
If the distribution base
pair,
the
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 26, No. 2, 1967
probability pairs
that
a sequence
followed is(n)
are
to or shorter
equal
= l/(1
the sequences steric
following
are
-E).
interaction
between
that
only
of them
the CC base
that
dAT
chain
but there
is sufficient
bunching
ber
of sites
to l/2.
Alternatively,
there
around
must
have
a G; for
example,
a neighboring We are
are
are
plies
ment
pairs
pair
grateful
to Dr. dAT.
J. Widholm
the U. S. P. H. S.
GM
for
is an additional
that
large
strong
a
distance.
a binding
at random
to decrease
= 28, half
unlikely this
a
binding
along
site, im-
the crab
the fractional
num-
sequence
require-
by Crothers
that the G
purine.
GM-10991 Grant
available
of such
the sequences
is intrinsically
the one suggested
of crab
under
half
if (2)
extend
(s - 1)AT
length
It seems
not distributed
the preparation from
that Thus,
would
CC base
l/2
- E).
pairs.
actinomycins
if every
Therefore, the observation
19 base
consistsof
Th e average
of 2 such
is In 2/(1
than
CC pair
- E).
The value
than11
longer
a given
is E n-1(1
by a CC pair
sequence
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
This
research
for
advice
has been
and instruction supported
on
by Grant
One of us (R. W. H. ) is an N. I. H.
Trainee
1262.
References Cavalieri, Davidson, Gellert, Goldberg, Hamilton, Hurwitz, Kahan, Kersten, Schwartz, Smith, Widholm,
L. and Nemchin, R. (1964). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 87, 641. N., Widholm, J., Nandi, U.S., Jensen, R., Olivera, B.M., and Wang, J. C. (1965). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. , U. S. , 53, 111. M. , Smith, C. E., Neville, D. , and Felsenfeld, G. (1965F J. Mol. Biol., 11, 445, I. H., RabiGwitz, M. , and Reich, E. (1962). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S., 48, 2094. L. D. , Fuller, W., and Reich, E. (1963). Nature, 198, 538. J., Furth, J. J., Malamy, M., and Alexander, M. (1962). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S., 3, 1222. E., Kahan, F. M. , and Hurwitz, J. (1963). J. Biol. Chem., 238, 2491. W. (1961). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 47, 610. M. N., Trautner, T. A., and Kornberg, A. (1962). J, Biol. Chem., 237, 1961. M. (1963).xochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 10, 67. J. (1965). Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
120