Vol. 63, No. 4,1975
THE BlNDING
BIOCHEMICAL
OF THlAMINE
AND BIOPHYSICAL
PYHOPXOSPBATE WlTH TBANSKBTOLASE IN
BQUIIJBXLUM G.A. Laboratory
Kochetov,
N.K.
CONDlTlONS
Tikhomirova,
Pebruary
10,
P.P.
Philippov
Lomonosov USSR
of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow 117234,
Received
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
State
University
,
1975
SUkMAHY: The binding between thiamine pyrophosphate and transketolase, purified from baker’s yeast, in e uilibrium conditions has been studied. In the presence of Ca 2!+, the enzyme molecule has been shown to possess two binding site! for the coenz whose dissociation constants are 3.2 x IF and 2.5 x IO- Fe’ M; besides, there are site(s) where the binding of the coeneyme is cooperative inIn the presence of Mg2+, a positive less firm. teraction between the binding sites of thiamine pyrophosphate has been observed. Regardless of the cation used, the major part of the catalytic activity of the transketolase molecule manifests itself in the binding of one molecule of the coenzyme.
In ketolase mine
1961
it
was shown by Hacker
(!!K)
molecule
pyrophosphate
which
the
died
(2-101,
but
TPP binding
2.
In
in
the
on Sephadex,
TK purified
of Ca2+ and Mg2’ quantity Copyright AN rights
on there
the
the present baker’s
under
the
o 19 75 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in any form resewed.
were
(6,g)
yeast equilibrium
paper
in were
that
the
stu-
number
was equal the
removed
to
presence by gel
of filt-
of protein-bound the
binding
was studied
in
conditions,
TPP was determined 924
in
quantity
thia-
some works
and it
then
a transof
analogues
was preincubated
which
from
of protein-bound
two works
cofactors
after ln
were
‘TPP and its
in
that
(I)
2 to 9 molecules
TK was determined,
enzyme
free
TPP was determined. with
Later
was only
sites
the
from
of TK with it
cases
TPP and Mg 2+, ration
(TPP).
interaction
of
both
may bind
and Datta
in
of ‘TPP the i.e.
the
presence the
presence
Vol. 63, No. 4,1975
BIOCHEMICAL
of an equilibrium
AND BIOPHYSICAL
concentration
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of the coenzyme.
METHODS TK, after al.
having been purified
was fractionated
(II),
lution
by the method of Racker et
twice or thrice
of ammonium sulphate
(pH 7.6);
with a saturated
the resulting
so-
preparations
of the enzyme were homogenous, as proved by the data of polgacrylamide
gel electrophoresis.
parations tivity
was
10
measured directly,
determined
25'C in both cases). by the optical
nm (the optical
density
density value
activity
of the pre-
or 20 U if
measurements TK was preincubated
(temperature
14.5
U if
The specific
prior
with 'I'PP and metal ion
The quantity
of protein
value of '!!!I(solutions
of 'I% TK solution
(12) ) or by the method of Lowry (13). of the measurements were multiplied
The TK activity
(14)
previously.
as described
in (15)
(1.4
The binding
with
phosphate buffer the required
(pH 7.6),
concentrations
containing
3.6p, tion 3.5
by a factor
were determined
columns
with 2.5 mM potassium1.0
mM CsC12 or MgC12 and 25'C).
was varied
in the presence of A6g 2+- from 0.2 to 3.6p; of gel filtration
of 0.7.
of TPP with TK was studied
of TPP (temperature
presence of Ca2+, the TPP concentration
case
and the re-
the help of Sephadex G-50
x 28 cm), which were equilibrated
at 280
In the latter
and the quanti tg of TPP (I>
as described
was
at 280 nm is
bovine serium albumin was used as standard protein sults
to ac-
In the
from 0.02 the dura-
was 2.5 hours in the former case and
hours in the latter.
The results on TPP-TK binding were treated in r/A vs r coordinates (161, where r is the value of the ratio of the number of protein-bound
TPP to the number of moles of TK (molecular
925
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 63, No. 4, 1975
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
2 . : 1 .. . 2 In i
:ig.
3indi ng of ‘I’PP wi til 2K in 62g2+ (B). For experimental Straight lines in Yig. IA res method.
1.
weight
140,000 (1) >, A is the concentration
our case the concentration to its
total
sing a different is bound
most
M, the site
there are several affinity
firmly
value
cases. It in Fig.
binding
is not excluded, IA is indicative
sites
zyme binding perimental In this
curves
is unknown,
than in the first
cooperative
two
interaction
An approximate
between the coen-
extrapolation
gives an r
the experiments 926
from that in the
of the r/A vs r dependence interaction
to the abscissa
case, unlike
constant
different
curve
cooperative (17).
x low8
between TPP and TK in the pre-
IB) is basically
sites
K'=3.2
(17).
of the binding
the positive
posses-
however, that the dependence shown
case of Ca2+. IJ!he bell-shaped reflects
sites
= 2.5 x low7 M; in addi-
much higher
of negative
between the TPP binding sence of Mg2+ (Fig.
constant
- I("
that
where the coenzyme
whose dissociation
is undoubtedly
The character
as indicating
independent
has a dissociation
of less firm
equal
obtained in the presence
to TPP. The site
there is a site(s)
but its
The results
IA) should be interpreted
in the ‘I’K molecule
of free TPP (in
of free coenzyme is practically
concentration).
of Ca2+ (Rig.
tion,
the pre:;\+nce of Ca 2+ (A) and conditions see “kiie tbods”. are drawn by the least squc;-
values
of the exclose
with Ca2+, no direct
to
2.
deter-
Vol. 63, No. 4, 1975
0.08
ifig.
;i.
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
t
Dependence of ,i’i; activitg on ‘22F aresence ol Ca2+ (A) and L1g2+ (8). termined cfter Gel filtration in rcted by a buffer containin&; Y!?P details see “fLethocis”). StraiLnt least squares method.
mination
of
studying
the dependence
the
concentration
is
KD value
(Fig. u,
possible,
of
2B).
t
t 60
V
--0---
/
0
this
. l
16 .0
can be done
activity
(v)
constant
(Kz)
by
on TPP deter-
.
.
0 l
l 0* 0
I I
0
I
0
I
1
3.
but
The dissociation
%
80
concentration in the ‘I’ii activity was deSephadex G-50 e uiliband the cation ‘zfor lines are drawn by the
transketolase
100
r'it;.
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
0
I
2 3 z Jkpcndencc of LX activity on the amount of proteinbound ,i’i?P. Reconstruction of holo-TK was carried out in the presence of Ca2+(0) or I,$+ (0); ( - - - ) theoretical graph for the case v:hen the enzyme mol.ecule contains only one DC tive center and vaiue K for active i’i?l? molecule is much lower ihan for nonactive one(s). Activity measured in the presence of the optimal conand ‘PW was kken for IO@;. centra tions of the cation
927
Vol.63,No.4,1975
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
mined in this way equals 3.0 x the case of Ca2+ (Pig. to 7.4 x
in which the binding
the major part,
Ca2+,
if
not all,
of the TK molecule is revealed in the binding
the TH activity obtained
the at every
3 that in the presenof the catalytic
in the binding
acti-
of one TPP
of the other molecule of the coenzyme,
insignificantly. Although the results in the presence of Mg2+ are not so unambiguous, it is
nevertheless vity
of TPP with
we also measured the ,I'K activity
r . It is seen in Pig.
given value of
molecule;
in
10-s.
apoenzyme was studied,
vity
calculation
2A) gives for TPP a value of KE equal
In the experimenta
ce of
M; a similar
10m7
increases
evident
that here too the major part of the acti-
should be referred
to the first
of the two bound TPP mole-
cules. DILSCUSSION It vity
has been demonstrated
of TK reveals
itself
that
the maximum catalytic
when approximately
come bound to a mole of the enzyme (6,g). on reconstruction
and the quantity
If
acti-
2 moles of TPP beno metal is added
of bound TPP is measured af-
ter the free coenzyme has been removed, the enzyme activity increases
linearly
as r changes from 0 to 2. In the presence
of Mg2+, the linearity
is not observed so strictly,
over 60% of the maximal TK activity if
was revealed
the removal of free TPP is carried
for a longer at least
time,
the percentage
7Q%regardless
the data of this
clusions: site
+l) either
(6). However,
out on larger
columns and
of the TIC activity
at ~1
of whether the metal (calcium
magnesium) is added or not (our unpublished plus
and at J.Y
data).
and/or
These data
study prompts one to the following
in the TK molecule
and the other TPP binding
site(s) 928
is
con-
there is only one active performs
a different
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 63, No. 4, 1975
function;
2)
sistes
to
the
the
of ‘TPP bound
different
the
with
certainty sites,
cooperative
or in
the
sites
possessing
is
not
lated.
the
pectively. from referred
to the
of
centre If
the
is
when
drawing
the
valid,
which
rison
is
3.0
x 10-7
in
possible M is
weakly
true,
then
fact
favour for known.
the of
the
the But,
second
to be bound, are
mutually
may be calcu-
M, res-
of Ca 2+ determined x low8
M and should site
if
the
two active
hypothe-
sites
speaking, K;#K;‘).
taken
is
the
will
that
in
as only the
be extent
No such
Mg2+,
this
account
to a certain
with
of
But if
into
hypothesis.
remembering
be
the Kh and Kg values
Ki
experiments
929
interconver-
x 10m7
(i.e.
This
case
ki and 2.5
strictly
unequality
(The
the pre-
and not
case.
coenzyme.
YPP in
about
expressed
sites,
for
i.e.
than,
a ne-
TPP binding
ligand
binding
be nonlinear
graph, in
7.4
valid,
either
sites
the presence is
is
constants
x low8
suggestion
should
nonlinearity
an ar$ument
is
is
curve
is
in
between
possibly
obtained
“stronger”,
effectivity
vs l/A
thus 3.2
the
TPP binding
dependence
first,
coincide.
different
to
value
one active
should
l/v
equal
vs l/A
l/v
values
of
of Bng2+ one may
to the
of dissociation
presence
independent
several,
affinity
be paid
the ‘!WP binding
to
values
the
cooperativity
affinities
the
in
case
several
in
and
should
Ca2+ there
with
If
The Ki
the
the
here).
of Ca 2+ are
binding
positive
are
different
The Ki and Ki’
sence
sis
there
may exists
discussed
the TK activity
between
different
with
independent,
the
whereas
TK molecule
forms
In
interaction
when an enzyme tin@;,
of TPP-TK
about
two active
attention
enzyme,
IA and IB).
are
effiCienCieS.
between
the
character
TPP binding
ga tive
to
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
there
catalytic
relationship
Ca2+ and Mg 2+ (Fig. speak
the TK molecule
different
from
amount
in
else
possessing Apart
the
or
AND BIOPHYSICAL
cornpaKg =
experiments
Vol. 63, No. 4,1975
sith
BIOCHEMICAL
Ca2+ the values
of q
AND BIOPHYSICAL
and l$ differ
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
two-fold
at the most,
the l$ value for TPP in the presence of BQ2+ may be estimated frosn the corresponding
I$.
The authors thanks T.Xhaifsts tion
of this
for
assistance
in prepara-
paper. REFERENCES
Datta, A.G. and Racker, E. (1961) Kochetov, G.A., Usmanov, R.A. and Letters 2, 265-266. G.A. and Usmanov, R.A. 3. Kochetov, Commun. 4l, 1134-1140. G.A., Izotova, A.E. and 4. Kochetov, Biochem.Eiophys.Res.Commun. 43, G.A. and Izotova, A.E. 5. Kochetov, ::
J.Biol.Chem. 236, Merzlov, V.P.7970) (1970)
624-628,
FEBS
Biochem.Biophys.Res.
Meshalkina, L.E. (1971) 3198-1203. (1972) Dokl.AN USSR 205,
986-988.
Kochetov, G.A., va, N.K. (1972) C.P., 7i Heinrich, Eur.J.Biochem. G.A. a. Kochetov, 6.
Izotova, A.E., Philippov, P.P. and TikhomiroBiochem.Biophys.Res.Cornmun. 46, 616-620. Steffen, H., Janser, P. and Wiss, 0. (1972) 30, 533-541. aa Izotova, A.E. (1973) Biokhimiya 38, 552-
559.
15.
Heinrich, C.P. (1973) Experientia 2, 1227-1228. Heinrich, C.P., Schmidt, D. and Noack, K. (1974) Eur.J.Biothem, 41, 555-561, Tabachnick, 1~1. and Racker, E. Srere, KA., Cooper, J.R., (1958) Arch.Eiochem.Biophys. 74, 295-305. Heinrich, C.P., Noack, K. and Wiss, 0. (1972) Biochem.Biophys. Res.Commun. 49, 1427-1432. Lowry, O.H., Rosenrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. R&l;,5;) J.Biol.Chem. 193, 265-275. E. (1961) in:?Ih-e Enzymes, vol. 5, pp. 397-406, Acade&c Press, New York and London. Hummel, J.P. and Dreyer, W.J. (1962) Biochim.Biophys.Acta
16, 17.
Scatchard, Cook, R.A.
1:: 11. 12. 13. 14.
63,
530-532.
G, (1949) Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci. and Koshland, D.E. (1970)
3342.
930
51,
660-672.
Biochemistry
2,
3337-