The constitution and configuration of the theaflavin pigments of black tea

The constitution and configuration of the theaflavin pigments of black tea

Tetrahedron Letters No.60, Pp. 5237-5240, 1970. Pergamon Press. Printed in Great Britain. THE CONSI’IlUTION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE THEAFLAVIN FIGM...

220KB Sizes 13 Downloads 56 Views

Tetrahedron Letters No.60, Pp. 5237-5240, 1970. Pergamon Press.

Printed in Great Britain.

THE CONSI’IlUTION AND CONFIGURATION OF THE THEAFLAVIN FIGMENTS OF BLACK TEA D. T. Coxon, A. Holmes, W. D. Ollis, * and V. C. Vora Department of Chemistry, The University, Sheffield S3 7HF (Received in UK 7 October 1970; accepted for publication

25 November 1970)

The pigments characteristic of black tea infusions are of two general types’ associated with the theaflavin fraction and the thearubigin fraction. proanthocyanidins . 2

The thearubigins have been recognised as polymeric

The theaflavin fraction contains a considerable number of compounds which are

benxtropolone derivatives including theaflavm 3’4 (I; ca. 8%). theaflavin-3-gallate (II; ca. 3%). the&h&n-3’-gallate

(III; ca. 20%), theaflavin-3.3’-digallate

theaflavic and epitheaflavic acids6

(IV; ca. 4%).

isotheaflavin5 (4%). and

the approximate relative proportions given by our present

fractionation procedures are indicated.

We now report upon the elucidation of the constitutions snd

configurations of the galloyl esters (II, III, and IV) by spectroscopic methods, and the confirmation of these configurations by synthesis. Chromatography [Sephadex LH 20; propan-2-01, acetic acid, water (4 : I: 4)] of the thesflavin fraction7 gave three well separated bands.

The first consisted mainly of theaflavin (I) and isotheaflavin,

the second yielded a mixture of the monogallates (II and III), and the third gave the digallate (IV).

The

IR spectra of the galloyl esters were very similar to that of theaflavin, but there were additional bands w 1690 cm -1. ) which could be assigned to gallates derived from alcoholic hydroxyl groups. (%o absorption spectra (Table 1) of the compounds (II, III, and IV) were extremely similar to that of

‘Ihe

theailavm (I) and their ORD curves closely corresponded with the ORD curve of theaflavin (I). ‘Ihe molecular formulae of the compounds (II), (III), and (IV) were established by high resolution mass spectrometric examination of their methyl ethers (methylation with dimethyl sulphate and potassium carbonate in boiling acetone). (VI and VII)

[Found: M, 856.2939.

The monogallates (II and III) gave the decamethyl ethers

C36H1806(0Me)lo requires M, 856.29431;

similarly characterised as the tridecamethyl ether (VIII) requires M, 1050.352].

[Found: M, 1050.353.

the digallate (IV) was C43H1907(OMe)13

Their absorption spectra (Table 1) and their mass spectral fragmentation

patterns summarised in the Scheme showed a striking relationship to that of theaflavm heptamethyl ether3 (V) and indicated particularly that the gallates (II, III, and IV) were galloyl derivatives involving either the 3- or the 3’-hydroxyl groups of theaflavin (I). (i) cleavage (-212 a.m.u.)

involving the trimethoxybenxoyloxy residues and (ii) retro-Diels-Alder

reactions (-166 a.m.u.). *

The fragmentations were clearly dominated by

To whom correspondence should be addressed. 5237

5

No.60

OR1

X = Galloyl(3,4.5-trlhydronybenroyl);

(IV).

of the NMR spectra

Although the monogallates

these three galloyl configurations

chloride

H

(III)

H

(Iv)

H

approximate

the assignments the indication

in pyridine gave,

(v)

Me

(VI)

Me

(VII)

Me

(VIII)

Me

1

hmax (Emax) in ethanol

supported the constitutions

by chromatography ratio 3

from their ORD curves

Having established

the Nh4R spectra

the constitutions

that they had corresponding

llmaflavin

after chromatographic

ether (VIII) and a mixture of theaflavin-3-

as a single fraction,

(II), (III), and

: 2) and the derived mixture of decamethyl

given in Table 2.

(II, III, and IV) was settled by synthesis.

methoxybenzoyl tridecamethyl

esters,

H

given in Table 2 clearly

were isolated

obtained on this mixture (II + III; ethers (VI + VII) permitted

spectra

(1) (IQ

R3 =

Y = 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl

TABLE Absor@on

Comparison

R2 =

R1 =

_

heptamethyl

fractionation,

and -3’-monogallate

of

absolute

ether (V) and 3,4, S-tritheaflavin3,3:digallate

decamethyl

ethers

(VI and

VII). The theaflavln oxldative

process

is not involved,

pigments do not occur

during the fermentation then the probable

and (-)-epigallocatechin

gallate],

in the green leaf,

but are formed

of green leaf to give black tea.

precursors’

are as indicated:

theaflavin-3’-gallate

(III)

theaflavln

[(-)-epicatechin

by an enzyme-catalysed If hydrolysis 3-gallate

of gallate esters (II)

[(-)-epicatechln

gallate and (-)-epigallo-

2 G?

a

b

C

d

Chemical

5”

2.00

7”

-4.84

-4.88

Tropolone -OH

3.05

3.12

MHz.)a

3”

2.02

1.98

-4.76

(100

6, 8; 6’, 8’ ma 2.46 1.99

1.98

-4.81

Spectra

4., 4’ ma 3.97-3.99 2.41

1.99

2.01

NMR

ma 7.07 3.85-4.01 2.41

2.01

2.35

2.

5.54d 6.92 3.85-4.01

2.26

2.79

TABLE

4.25

I 5.36 6.92 3.82-3.89

4.05

5.86

7.09

7.09

3.72-3.91

3.72-3.91

4.05

4.05

2.96

2.96

2.52

2.43

2.36

6.04,

6.45

6.27-6.30

Methoxyl

6.04-6.24,

6.45

6.12, 2.92

6.04 -6.24,

6.50

2.92 2.90

6.35,

2.88,

6.14-6.22,

2.96,

HC g

5.46d 4.20 4.20 6.91

3.79-3.96

I

4.97 4.20 4.01 4.17 7.12

4.30 4.66

2.95

3’

4.66 5.54 3.90

/ 5.76

2’

4.90 4.17 4.50

2

4.52 5.52 4.66 4.30

4.02

3.01

5.38 5.04 5.86

3.74-3.87

I

5.33

7.02

is quoted.

the signals given in Table 2 are singlets,

4.48

indicated,

4.27

Unless otherwise

4.48

scale.

4.96

shifts are given on the f

(V) - (VIII).

= m, and either the range of the multiplet or the centre of broad multiplets CDC13 for compounds

Multiplets

(I) - (IV);

et a1.8 __

atoms of either galloyl or 3,4, S-trimethoxybenzoyl

for compounds

(CD3)2C0

to the 2,6-hydrogen

differ from those of P. D. Collier

groups

Solvents: Hg refers

These assignments

3240

No.60

catechin]

and theaflavin-3,

Our configurations

I’-digallate

(IV)

[(-)-epicatechin

(II, Ill, and IV) are different

has kindly informed us that these earlier

gallate and (-)-epigallocatechin

gallate]

.

from those already reported, 8 but Dr. Collier

formulations8

are in error

and that they should be amended

to become identical with ours.

W)

tw w w

cw

-

(a

-

l(V)-]

(-166)~

m/e 496

T6,

(-166)b

m/e 330

m,e 478

m/e 644

m/e 672

m/e 626

OMe

OMe (IX)

(-166)~

m/e 212

(X)

m/e 460

OMe

m/e 195

(XI)

OMe

m/e 191

(XII)

m/e 167

REFERENCES

(1) E. A. H. Roberts,

in The Chemistry of Flavonoid Compounds (edited by T. A. Geissman), p. 468, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1962); D. J. Millin and D. W. Rustidge, Process Biochem. (6), 2, 9 (1967); D. J. Millin, D. Swaine, and P. L. Dix, J.Sci.Food Agric. 22, 296 (1969).

Nature 221, 742 (1969); (2) A. G. Brown, W. B. Eyton, A. Holmes, and W. D. Ollis, -Phytochemistrp

5, 2333 (1969).

(3)

Y. Takino,

A. Ferretti,

V. Flanagan, M. Gianturco,

(4)

A. G. Brown, C. P. Falshaw, 1193 (1966).

E. Haslam,

and M. Vogel,

A. Holmes,

Tetrahedron

and W. D. Ollis,

Tetrahedron

(5)

D. T. Coxon, A. Holmes,

and W. D. Ollis,

Tetrahedron

Letters

(1970).

(6)

D. T. Coxon, A. Holmes,

and W. D. Ollis,

Tetrahedron

Letters

(1970).

(7)

E. A. H. Roberts and M. Myers,

(8)

T. Bryce, P. D. Collier, Letters 2789 (1970).

J.Sci.Food

I. Fowlis,

Agric.

P. E. Thomas,

Letters

4019 (1965).

Letters

Lo=, 176 (1959). D. Frost,

and C. K. Wilkins,

Tetrahedron