The Corneal Graft: A Multiple Variable Analysis of the Penetrating Keratoplasty

The Corneal Graft: A Multiple Variable Analysis of the Penetrating Keratoplasty

AMERICAN JOURNAL VOLUME 72 OF OPHTHALMOLOGY JULY, 1971 NUMBER 1, PART 2 THE CORNEAL GRAFT: A MULTIPLE VARIABLE ANALYSIS OF THE PENETRATING KERATO...

389KB Sizes 1 Downloads 25 Views

AMERICAN JOURNAL VOLUME

72

OF OPHTHALMOLOGY

JULY, 1971

NUMBER 1, PART 2

THE CORNEAL GRAFT: A MULTIPLE VARIABLE ANALYSIS OF THE PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY THOMAS E.

M O O R E , J R . , M.D.,

AND S A M U E L B. ARONSON,

M.D.

San Francisco, California

The period of delayed graft reaction be­ gins when the early graft reaction ends and extends indefinitely. Variables in this period include: (1) microbiology of the external eye, (2) immunologic factors in the host re­ sponse, (3) pre- and postoperative morphol­ ogy of the host eye, and (4) socioeconomic status of the recipient. Morphologic struc­ ture and socioeconomic status proved to be the critical variables in delayed graft failure. The combination of early and delayed graft results makes up the long-term graft results for this series. Patients have been followed for a maximum of five years, so that definite long-term prognoses cannot be presented. However, the incidence of delayed graft reac­ tion appears to diminish with time, so that reasonable projections can be made. To evaluate clinical variables more exten­ sively simultaneous studies were done in the rabbit. The early graft period was desig­ nated arbitrarily at 75 days, although sutures were removed between 10 and 14 days. Such early suture removal was required if a suc­ cessful graft was to be achieved. The vari­ ables studied in this period were: (1) the surgical procedure, (2) suture toxicity, (3) pathogenic and indigenous bacterial toxicity, (4) tissue noncompatibility, and (5) genetic variability of the host. The factors of princi­ pal significance were: (1) the surgical pro­ cedure, (2) the suture material, and (3) ge­ netic composition. The delayed graft reaction was evaluated in rabbits 90 days following surgery. De­ Reprint requests to Thomas E. Moore, Jr., M.D., Suite 309, 45 Castro Street, San Francisco, Califor­ layed reactions were studied under both nia 94114. spontaneous and experimental conditions.

Since the early period of keratoplasty, ophthalmic surgeons have anticipated a good outcome in the grafting of any diseased cor­ nea. In the past, success could be attained only in patients with good prognosis. To maximize the possibility of success, we at­ tempted to identify and define accurately the operative variables associated with graft fail­ ure. Early in this attempt, it became evident that variables could be subdivided into two general groups according to time of occur­ rence : (1) the period of early graft reaction, and (2) the delayed reaction period. The early period (Fig. 1) extended from the time of surgery until suture removal. Arbitrarily se­ lected variables in this period were: (1) se­ lection of the donor graft tissue, (2) thera­ peutic protocols before and after surgery, (3) adjunctive medical therapy in the post­ operative period, and (4) standardization of surgical technique to permit classification of each procedure. Variables evaluated and compared include: (1) morphologic status of the host eye, (2) etiologic and syndromal di­ agnosis of the host eye, (3) surgical proce­ dures, (4) suture materials and techniques, (5) microbially-induced reactions, (6) immunologic status of the host, and (7) tissue noncompatibility. The variables found to be essential in the early graft period were: (1) morphologic classification, (2) surgical pro­ cedure, and (3) suture material.

205

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY

206

JULY, 1971

A. latency before inflam motion B. early graft reaction C. inflammatory resolution D. delayed graft reaction X physiologic failure

>-

y

ui

>

V)

/

/

y y

S

£ ~" -^

\

\

/ / /

« A:—*

/

/

/

/

X

^

B.

C.

/ \

\

\

\

\

\

/

,C

y '

s

r> X . yl

\

A

\ \

TIME

Fig. 1 (Moore and Aronson). The corneal graft reaction. The early graft reaction comprises periods B and C in a successful graft and B and X in graft failure. The delayed graft reaction comprises D in a successful graft and X in graft failure.

Variables evaluated include: (1) bacterial and antigenic stimuli, (2) immune compe­ tence of the host response, and (3) the se­ verity of structural alteration. The rabbit graft experiments strongly support the ob­ servations made in the human series and provide a much more accurate appraisal of several factors in graft failure, e.g., the role of the tissue noncompatibility reaction. How­ ever, these observations cannot be used to verify aspects of the human data, but only to support it. Finally, a large number of variables have been analyzed by discriminant function. This procedure provides statistical evidence to sup­

port some of our observations, e.g., the surgi­ cal procedure and suture toxicity. Similarly, it demonstrates that others are not statisti­ cally valid, e.g., immunologic evaluation. The strength of this technique is that an indepen­ dent evaluation has utilized prospective data from our graft series and has placed in perspective the importance of each studied variable. Although these studies have fallen some­ what short of our projected goal—namely, to graft successfully any vision-reducing cornea —they present an integrated approach to the corneal graft whereby that goal can one day be reached.