Cytotherapy (2001) Vol. 3, No. 3, 175–188
Review
The current status of T-cell depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplants in adult patients with AML D Bunjes Stem Cell Transplantation Programme, Department of Haematology/Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, FRG
Introduction Treatment results for adult patients suffering from AML have improved considerably over the past 10 years, thanks to the use of intensive consolidation therapy [1,2]. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients relapse or never achieve a remission, and an allogeneic stem-cell transplant (SCT) is the only curative treatment option available [3,4]. For those 60–80% of patients who achieve a remission after induction chemotherapy, the optimal consolidation therapy has not yet been defined [2–4]. In several randomized prospective trials comparing allogeneic SCT with autologous SCT and consolidation chemotherapy, the lowest relapse rates have consistently been observed after allogeneic SCT [2,5–7]. None of these trials have reported a survival advantage for patients given an allogeneic SCT as consolidation therapy in first remission, because of the high procedure-related mortality associated with an allogeneic transplant. Transplantrelated complications cause the death of 20–30% of patients with AML transplanted from an HLA-identical sibling in first CR, and this figure rises to 40–50% in patients beyond first remission [8]. Most of these procedure-related deaths are directly or indirectly caused by GvHD, which also has a dominant influence on the qualityof-life achieved after an allogeneic SCT [9,10]. A combination of cyclosporine and methotrexate 6 steroids given post-transplant is used as GvHDprophylaxis in approximately two-thirds of patients receiving an allogeneic SCT worldwide [8]. The efficacy of this combination is limited, 30–50% of patients receiving an HLA-identical sibling transplant will develop clinically relevant Grade II–IV acute GvHD and the same percentage develop chronic GvHD [11–13]. The incidence of
acute GvHD rises to 70–100% in patients given matched unrelated or mismatched family donor grafts [14–16]. Ever since the central role of T cells in the pathogenesis of GvHD was established in animal experiments in the late 1970s [17,18], the removal of T cells from the graft, i.e. T-cell depletion, has suggested itself as a potentially more effective and less toxic alternative to post-transplant immunosuppression. The initial results of the first trials of T-cell depletion in human allogeneic SCT seemed to confirm these expectations [19–23]. Provided that a ù 2 log T-cell depletion was achieved, the incidence of Grade II–IV acute GvHD was reduced to 10–20% after an HLAidentical transplant and a similar reduction in chronic GvHD was observed. Haploidentical transplants can be performed with a 10% risk of Grade II–IV acute GvHD if the graft is depleted by 3–3.5 log [24,25]. However, it rapidly became apparent that T-cell depletion was associated with a 10–60% risk of graft failure and a 2–5 fold increase in the risk of relapse [20–23,26–28]. T-cell depletion was also shown to delay immune reconstitution after SCT and to increase the risk of EBV-induced lymphoproliferative disease [29,30]. Thus, Marmont et al. concluded in 1991 that, although T-cell depletion reduced the risk of acute and chronic GvHD, it increased the risk of treatment failure for all types of leukemia [31]. Over the past 10 years, numerous investigators have attempted to define the pathogenesis of the complications associated with T-cell depletion and to develop strategies to overcome them. The following review will describe and discuss the most important of these strategies and their impact on T-cell depleted transplants for acute leukemia.
Correspondence to: D Bunjes, Stem Cell Transplantation Programme, Department of Haematology/Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Robert Koch Strasse 8, 89081 Ulm, Germany. © 2001 ISHAGE
175
176
D Bunjes
The pathogenesis of graft failure and approaches to prevention The increased risk of graft failure observed in practically all studies of T-cell depletion could be caused by two general mechanisms: Stem-cell damage due to the manipulation of the graft in vitro. n Loss of a graft-enhancing effect of graft T cells, which could be due to their production of growth-stimulating cytokines, or their alloreactivity towards residual host cell. n
A multivariate analysis performed by the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) on a large number of patients receiving T-cell depleted BM grafts from HLA-identical siblings revealed three major factors with a protective effect against graft failure [31]: A TBI dose of . 11 Gy. A high dose-rate of TBI. n Post-transplant immunosuppression with cyclosporine and/or methotrexate. n n
These data clearly suggest that host anti-donor immune reactivity, normally eliminated by the T cells in the graft, is the main mechanism responsible for the graft failures observed after T-cell depleted SCT. Laboratory studies in several centers have indeed confirmed that host T cells with reactivity against donor hemopoiesis can be identified in the peripheral blood of patients with graft failure [32–41]. There is no evidence in the literature to suggest that stem-cell damage due to graft manipulation has been a significant cause of graft failure, but the possibility that T cells contribute to engraftment by producing cytokines was not excluded. Based on these in vitro studies, investigators have proposed and evaluated a number of approaches to prevent graft failures: n n n n n n n
Intensifying the chemoconditioning prior to SCT; Increasing the dose of TBI; Adding TLI to TBI; In vivo T-cell depletion with MAbs, or ATG/ALG; Giving hemopoietic growth factors, such as GM-CSF or G-CSF; Partial or selective T-cell depletion; Increasing the stem-cell dose.
The experimental basis for intensifying chemoconditioning, increasing the dose of TBI or adding TLI was mainly provided by work performed by Reisner’s group in Israel [42–46]. In these animal studies, the addition of alkylating agents, such as thiotepa or dimethylbusulfan, increasing the dose of TBI, or adding TLI, significantly reduced the risk of graft failure. These animal data were confirmed in human studies in which either additional chemotherapy or a higher dose of TBI were used. In some of these studies, however, no survival benefit was obtained, due to increased organ toxicity [26,47,48]. Adding TLI to the standard conditioning regimen has proved to be both effective and well tolerated [49–52]. In view of the importance of radioresistant host T lymphocytes, a more selective approach to inactivating or eliminating these cells in vivo, by the use of MAbs or ATG/ALG appeared to be an attractive option. Functional inactivation of host T cells using an antiLFA1 MAb was effective in preventing graft failures in children with congenital immunodeficiencies, but not in patients with leukemias [53,54]. The concept of in vivo/ex vivo T-cell depletion with MAbs, to control both GvHD and graft failure, was established in an experimental mouse model by Cobbold et al. [55], and CAMPATH-1G was found to be as effective as TBI or high-dose chemotherapy in depleting T cells in vivo [56]. This approach has been used in several studies utilizing either ATG or CAMPATH-1G for in vivo T-cell depletion. The efficacy of ATG is difficult to evaluate because in the studies in which it has been used the investigators have generally intensified chemoradiotherapy as well [57,58]. This very intensive conditioning was highly effective in preventing graft failure and was well tolerated. Proof of principle for the in vivo/ex vivo concept was provided by a study of the CAMPATH Users Group, in which the only change in the conditioning of the study group was the addition of CAMPATH-1G. This significantly reduced the risk of graft failure when compared with a historical control group [59,60]. The addition of hemopoietic growth factors after SCT has been tested in a very limited number of patients, but giving GM-CSF had no effect on the rate of graft failures after T-celldepleted SCT [61]. Several groups have performed selective or partial T-cell depletion to reduce the risk of graft failure. Depletion of only CD81 T cells did not improve engraftment [62,63], which is not surprising given the fact that
T-cell depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplants
CD81 T cells appear to have a graft-enhancing effect [64]. Partial depletion of marrow T cells, or early addback of donor T cells has been effective in terms of preventing graft failure, but has been associated with a clearly increased risk of GvHD [50,65,66]. There is ample evidence from animal studies that a high marrow-cell or stem-cell dose promotes engraftment [67,68]. In recent years there have been several reports emphasizing the importance of a high marrow cell count and/or high numbers of CD341 cells for the outcome of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation [15,69–72]. Given the limited scope for increasing the stem-cell dose in human BMT, no formal trial testing of this hypothesis has been performed. However, there is some evidence available from haploidentical SCT. Aversa et al. were able to significantly reduce the risk of graft failure by adding T-cell depleted G-CSF mobilized PBPC to T-cell-depleted haploidentical BM grafts [25,58]. The discussion has so far focused on graft failure after a T-cell depleted HLA-compatible family-donor transplant. The amount of information about the risk of graft failure after a T-cell depleted MUD transplant, or an HLA-mismatched family donor is limited. The risk of graft failure after a T-cell depleted MUD transplant seems somewhat higher than after a matched family transplant, in spite of the fact that the majority of patients received an intensified conditioning regimen and most of them were given cyclosporine post-transplant [16,73,74]. The incidence of graft failure after a MUD transplant is of the order of 10–15%, even if additional in vivo T-cell depletion is performed and high stem-cell doses are given, as shown in pediatric trials [75,76]. T-cell depletion of haploidentical marrow grafts for patients with leukemia was associated with a prohibitive graft failure rate, of up to 50% [77]. In the past 5 years several investigators have achieved significant improvements in the rate of stable engraftment in this group of patients. Two types of approach have been pursued. The Perugia group and several other groups have combined an intensified conditioning regimen, in vivo T-cell depletion with ATG and an ultra-high stem-cell dose, obtained by either adding mobilized blood stem cells to a marrow graft, or by using a large number of blood stem cells [25,78–80]. The mechanism of action of the high doses of T cells has not been completely defined, but there is some experimental evidence suggesting that donor CD341 cells are acting as veto cells for host T cells [81]. The
177
alternative approach has been to combine very intensive conditioning with partial T-cell depletion and intensive post-transplant immunosuppression [82]. Both approaches have succeeded in reducing the incidence of graft failure after a T-cell depleted haploidentical stem-cell transplant to about 10%.
The pathogenesis of relapse and approaches to its prevention Within a few years of the introduction of T-cell depletion into clinical practice it became obvious that this type of GvHD prophylaxis was associated with a greatly increased risk of relapse for patients with CML in the first chronic phase [28,83]. The initial reports in patients with AML were contradictory, with some centers reporting no increase in relapse rates [20,23,84–86] and others observing a significantly higher risk of relapse [27]. Two large studies by the IBMTR using multivariate analysis then provided clear evidence that T-cell depletion is associated with an increased risk of relapse, even among patients transplanted in first remission, although the risk is very much lower than in patients with CML [31,87]. The analysis performed by Horowitz et al. [87], and the study of identical twins by Gale et al. [88], suggested that there were three different variants of the GvL effect mediated by donor T cells: A GvL effect associated with GvHD mediated by T cells with specificity for minor histocompatibility Ags shared by leukemic blasts and GvHD target tissues. n A GvL effect associated with alloreactivity, but independent of GvHD mediated by T cells with specificity for hemopoiesis-restricted minor Ags. n A GvL-effect induced by T cells with specificity for leukemia-specific Ags. n
These hypothetical mechanisms were supported by experimental studies demonstrating that T cells with these different target specificities could be found in the blood of healthy donors [89–93]. Direct proof of the potency of the GvL effect exerted by donor T cells was provided by the pioneering work of Slavin and Kolb who showed that donor lymphocytes can induce complete remissions in patients relapsing after allogeneic transplants without the help of cytoreductive chemoradiotherapy [94,95]. Although donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are most effective in patients with relapsed CML in chronic phase, there is clear evidence
178
D Bunjes
that they can induce complete remissions in 20–25% of patients with an AML relapse after allogeneic SCT [96–98]. These observations clearly suggest two approaches to reducing the relapse risk after T-cell depleted stem-cell transplant in patients with acute leukemia: Intensification of the conditioning regimen, by increasing the dose of TBI and/or adding additional cytoreductive drugs. n Prophylactic or preemptive use of donor lymphocytes post-transplant. n
Several investigators have chosen the first approach, usually raising the TBI dose from 12 to 14–15.75 Gy and/or adding cytotoxic drugs, such as thiotepa or high-dose cytosine arabinoside [30,57,58,86,99]. In contrast to patients given GvHD-prophylaxis with cyclosporine/ methotrexate, patients receiving T-cell depleted grafts tolerated these intensified conditioning regimens without increased organ toxicity [100,101]. The relapse rates reported in these studies for patients with AML in first remission were similar to, or lower than those receiving conventional GvHD-prophylaxis [3,8,102]. However, I would like to point out that very similar results have been achieved without the intensification of cytoreductive therapy in patients with AML in first CR [51,52,59,85]. Most of these studies provide little information about the cytogenetics of the leukemias at diagnosis, which is the most important prognostic factor for outcome after both chemotherapy and allogeneic SCT [103–106]. Therefore, the impact of T-cell depletion in this group of patients is unclear at present. The number of TD allogeneic SCT performed in patients beyond first remission is fairly small, because most investigators have considered the relapse rates reported by the IBMTR to be unacceptably high [31]. There is limited information available for patients transplanted in second remission after an intensified conditioning regimen containing high-dose TBI and thiotepa [57,58]. The relapse rates in these two studies do not appear to be significantly higher than in patients receiving a conventional transplant [3,8,107]. In our own institution we have initiated a study to intensify the conditioning regimen of patients at high risk of relapse after a TD SCT by using a radiolabeled MAb [108]. The concept of targeted radiotherapy of the BM using radiolabeled MAbs was pioneered by
investigators in Seattle and New York, using 131Ilabelled anti-CD33 and anti-CD45 antibodies [109–115]. These studies established the feasibility of this approach in the context of a conventional BMT with HLA-identical sibling donors and the results are quite encouraging [116,117]. Our study differs from the Seattle study in several important respects. In order to improve feasibility we used a 188Re-labeled anti-CD66, instead of the 131I-labeled anti-CD45 Ab, thus significantly reducing the radiation-protection requirements for the study. We included both patients with high-risk AML in first remission and patients beyond first remission in our study, and donors were not restricted to HLA-identical siblings but also included mismatched or haploidentical family donors and MUD. More than 90% of patients received G-CSF mobilized PBPC, instead of BM, and all grafts were T-cell depleted with CAMPATH-1H for HLA-compatible family donors and CD341 selection for MUD and haploidentical transplants [108]. Patients with a favorable dosimetry received a therapeutic dose of the labeled antibody prior to standard myeloablative conditioning with TBI, or busulfan plus high-dose cyclophosphamide. Over the last 3 years we have recruited a total of 42 patients with high risk AML/MDS for the study. The median age of the patients was 48 years, 17 were in first or second remission at the time of transplant and 25 in partial remission, with ø 25% blasts in the BM. Approximately half the patients received mobilized blood cells from an alternative donor. The radioimmunoconjugate provided a mean dose of 15 Gy to the marrow, the kidney was the dose-limiting normal organ. Acute toxicity was low, with a mortality of 6% at 100 days. After a median follow-up of 18 months the overall transplantrelated mortality was 22%, 26% of patients have now relapsed, 20% of those in first or second remission at the time of transplant and 30% of those not in remission (Bunjes et al., Blood, submitted). For patients transplanted in remission the actuarial probability of DFS is 67%, for those grafted in partial remission it is 30%. This approach may reduce the incidence of relapse after T-cell depleted SCT in patients with a high risk of relapse and transplant-related death. It is difficult to judge how much the use of blood stem cells may have contributed to the low relapse rate and the relatively low transplant-related mortality [70,118,119].
T-cell depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplants
The concept of using prophylactic or preemptive DLI to prevent hematological relapse has not been extensively tested in patients with acute leukemia, although it is highly effective among patients with CML in chronic phase receiving T-cell depleted grafts from HLA-identical siblings [66,120–122]. The interpretation of the data from the two studies that included AML patients is complicated by low numbers [66] and several different schedules for DLI [50]. Both studies suggest a lower relapse rate among patients transplanted in remission, but this does not reach statistical significance — even in the study with a sufficient number of patients to be statistically significant [50]. In both studies the early use of DLI was associated with a significant incidence of acute and chronic GvHD [50,66]. The same trends were observed if grafts with a fixed, low number of T cells were used [65].
The pathogenesis of immunodeficiency and approaches to its prevention The third untoward effect of T-cell-depleted SCT is a delay in immunological reconstitution. Several studies have documented that T-cell depletion delays the reconstitution of T-cell and B-cell function by approximately 6–12 months, especially in adults and in patients receiving grafts from alternative donors [29,123–127]. The most consistent findings have been a very rapid reconstitution of natural killer (NK) cell function and a long delay in the regeneration of CD41 T cells, especially CD41 CD45RA1, i.e. naive helper cells. Since CD41 counts have an influence on the risk of infection after allogeneic SCT [128], it is not surprising that several studies have appeared reporting a high incidence of and a high mortality from viral infections after T-cell depleted SCT [126,129–131]. Early T-cell regeneration after SCT is normally the result of the peripheral expansion of mature T cells in the graft [132–134], whereas late T-cell regeneration and the production of CD45RA1 T cells is dependent on thymic function [135–138]. It is therefore not surprising that T-cell depletion results in a delay in T-cell reconstitution and/or the development of a restricted T-cell repertoire [139–141]. There is no evidence to suggest that the late phase of T-cell reconstitution is compromised by T-cell depletion but, since the majority of patients receiving T-cell depleted grafts are adults and thymic function is compromised anyway, a delay in this phase can be anticipated [135,136,142–144].
179
A limited number of strategies to accelerate T-cell reconstitution have so far been investigated. Early donor lymphocyte infusions have contributed to the clearance of infection in individual patients, but their overall impact on T-cell reconstitution and T-cell repertoire development has been limited and they have been associated with a significant risk of GvHD [66,123,124,141]. A number of strategies have been suggested to circumvent the problem of DLI-associated GvHD. One approach is the prophylactic or preemptive infusion of pathogen-specific T-cell lines or clones. This strategy has been tested for CMV and EBV infections, in the context of both conventional and T-cell depleted SCT [145–147]. The data reported are impressive and suggest that this is a highly effective way of protecting patients against selected pathogens. But this approach does have clear-cut limitations. It is restricted to an individual pathogen and it is extremely time-consuming, labor intensive and expensive. It is doubtful whether it is suitable for routine use in a moderately sized transplant program. An alternative is the inactivation or elimination of alloreactive T cells, either from the graft in vitro or by suicide-gene activation in vivo [148–151]. Although effective in small numbers of patients the value of these methods remains unclear at present. The application of cytokines to stimulate T-cell reconstitution after T-cell depleted allogeneic SCT has been limited to low-dose IL2 [152]. Unfortunately, no significant acceleration of T-cell reconstitution was observed. Other cytokines, which have proven effective in animal experiments, have so far not been tested in man.
The pathogenesis of EBV-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease and methods for its prevention The expansion of EBV-infected human B cells is normally controlled by T-cells specific for certain viral peptides [153]. It is therefore not surprising that several single-center and registry studies have demonstrated an increased risk of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease (BLPD) after T-cell depleted allogeneic SCTs [30,154]. The risk seems to be higher among patients receiving mismatched family donor or MUD grafts and seems to be dependent on the method used for T-cell depletion. This complication of T-cell depletion can be effectively prevented by B-cell depletion of the graft, e.g. with CD52 Abs [154–156], or by the prophylactic
180
D Bunjes
infusion of EBV-specific donor T-cell lines [147]. A more practical approach is the monitoring of EBV-reactivation by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the prophylactic use of the anti-CD 20 Mab (rituximab), which is also highly effective in the treatment of this complication [157–160]. DLI are an effective alternative for the treatment of this life-threatening complication [161,162].
The role of T-cell depleted PBPC Over the past 5 years G-CSF mobilized PBPC have gradually supplanted BM as the preferred stem-cell source in HLA-identical stem-cell transplants [163–165]. Several randomized trials have consistently demonstrated that hemopoietic reconstitution is faster after PBPC grafts than after a marrow graft, whereas no difference in the incidence of acute GvHD was observed. An increase in chronic GvHD was noted in some studies, but this was not a consistent finding [118,119,166,167]. Although overall survival was not different in these studies, there is a trend towards an improved DFS in patients with advanced acute leukemias. A similar trend was observed in a recently published large registry study [168]. All of these studies were performed with unmanipulated PBPC. T-cell depleted PBPC transplants have been reported in several small and one larger trial [169–173]. In these initial trials, graft failure did not appear to be a significant problem, probably because only a moderate degree of T-cell depletion was achieved and the majority of patients were given additional GvHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine 6 methotrexate. In a recent update of the largest trial of T-cell depleted PBPC a significant incidence of graft failures (11%) was noted in patients receiving a T-cell PBPC graft from an HLA-identical donor after effective depletion with a number of CD 341 selection techniques, but without rejection prophylaxis [174]. In vivo T-cell depletion with CAMPATH-1H has been shown to be effective in preventing graft failures in HLA-identical PBPC transplants [175,176]. In our own center we have not observed a single case of graft failure in . 50 patients receiving a PBPC graft from an HLAcompatible sibling donor after in vivo/ex vivo T-cell depletion with CAMPATH-1H [85]. The incidence of both acute and chronic GvHD in some of the studies of T-cell depleted PBPC grafts has been significant; probably because of the only moderate T-cell depletion achieved with early CD341 selection techniques
[169,170]. In Ulm we have observed a significant increase in GvHD after in vivo/ex vivo T-cell depletion of PBPC grafts with CAMPATH-1H, compared with in vivo/ex vivo T-cell depletion of BM with CAMPATH1G/CAMPATH-1M [59,85]. This difference might be a reflection of the less effective T-cell depletion achieved with a lower dose of Ab (20–30 mg of CAMPATH-1H) as compared with 100 mg of CAMPATH-1G in the marrow group in the face of a 10-fold load of donor T cells. With higher in vivo doses of CAMPATH-1H, the incidence of GvHD in PBPC transplants seems comparable to that observed in BMT [176]. The impact of using T-cell depleted PBPC on other measures of outcome, such as relapse, DFS, or survival, is unknown at present. We have not been able to confirm the accelerated immunological reconstitution observed after unmanipulated PBPC transplants [177] in patients receiving PBPC grafts depleted by using CAMPATH-1H. On the contrary, our impression is that the recovery of T-cell function is possibly further delayed [85,178]. One conceivable mechanism for this functional delay could be the use of G-CSF pre-transplant to mobilize stem cells and post-transplant to accelerate neutrophil recovery after SCT. There is growing evidence that the use of G-CSF might prime donor T cells to differentiate into Type 2 T-helper cells and may also impair NK cell function [179–183]. The amount of information about PBPC transplants with grafts derived from MUD donors is very limited [184]. Of the patients reported in the study by Ringden et al. only a small subgroup received grafts T-cell depleted by CD341 selection. A significant incidence of graft failure was reported in spite of in vivo T-cell depletion with ATG. However, graft failures were limited to patients conditioned with busulfan/cyclophosphamide. This combination may not be sufficiently immunosuppressive for a T-cell depleted SCT [185]. In our center we have performed . 40 CD341 selected MUD PBPC transplants after in vivo/ex vivo T-cell depletion with ATG and CD341 selection, and have observed a residue of graft failures affecting 5–10% of patients. This incidence of graft failures is similar to that reported for patients receiving T-cell depleted PBPC grafts from haploidentical family donors [25,78–80]. The relapse rate for patients with AML in these studies was surprisingly low, in spite of the fact that the vast majority had very advanced disease at the time of transplant. One potential explanation for these observations is the appearance
T-cell depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplants
of alloreactive NK cells in the peripheral blood of patients post-transplant, which can exert a powerful antileukemic effect, at least in vitro [186]. The incidence of infections, BLPD and overall transplant-related mortality after haploidentical PBPCT seems similar to that reported for MUD marrow transplants for patients with advanced AML [15,16,69]. The introduction of PBSC represents a significant advance for patients requiring a haploidentical SCT.
Summary
3 4
5
6
For patients with standard-risk leukemia scheduled for an HLA-identical family donor transplant, T-cell depletion of the marrow graft constitutes an acceptable, if not superior, alternative to standard GvHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine/methotrexate, provided appropriate graft rejection prophylaxis with in vivo T-cell depletion or TLI is used. Although there is no evidence available to show that T-cell depletion is superior to conventional GvHD prophylaxis, in terms of leukemia-free survival, the more effective prevention of chronic GvHD results in a better quality-of-life for surviving patients. It is unclear whether replacing BM by blood as a stem-cell source improves the overall outcome in these good-risk patients. T-cell depletion of the graft is also appropriate for patients with high-risk features grafted in first or second CR, provided that an intensified conditioning regimen is used to reduce the risk of relapse. Patients with more advanced disease with a matched family donor or MUD should only receive a T-cell depleted graft in the context of a clinical trial geared to reducing the risk of relapse. In this setting, a PBPC graft may be preferable to a BM graft. If no compatible family donor is available and a compatible unrelated donor cannot be identified within an adequate time-frame, a T-cell depleted haploidentical PBPC graft is probably the most suitable approach, provided an intensified conditioning regimen and appropriate graft rejection prophylaxis are used. The delay in immune reconstitution remains the most intractable problem associated with T-cell depleted allogeneic SCT and a major research effort will be required to address this problem.
10
References
15
1
2
Mayer R, Davis R, Schiffer C et al. Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1994;331:896. Wheatley K, Burnett A, Goldstone A et al. A simple, robust, validated and highly predictive index for the deter-
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
16
181
mination of risk-directed therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia derived from the MRC AML 10 trial. Br J Haematol 1999;107:69–79. Appelbaum F. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Sem Oncol 1997;24:114–23. Edenfield W, Gore S. Stage-specific application of allogeneic and autologous marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Oncol 1999;26:21–34. Appelbaum F, Fisher L, Thomas E et al. Chemotherapy v marrow transplantation for adults with nonlymphoblastic leukemia: a five-year follow-up. Blood 1988;72:179–84. Archimbaud E, Thomas X, Michallet M et al. Prospective genetically randomized comparison between intensive postinduction chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation inadults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:262–7. Zittoun R, Mandelli F, Willemze R et al. Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 1995;332:217–23. Horowitz M. Results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for malignant disorders. In: Hoffman R, Benz E, Shattil S et al., editors. Hematology, basic principles and practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 1999:1573–87. Sullivan K, Weiden P, Storb R et al. Influence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease on relapse and survival after bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical siblings as treatment of acute and chronic leukemia. Blood 1989;73:1720–8. Sullivan K. Graft-versus-host disease. In: Forman S, Blume K, Thomas E, editors. Bone marrow transplantation. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993:339–62. Storb R, Deeg H, Whitehead J et al. Methotrexate and cyclosporine compared with cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation for leukemia. N Engl J Med 1986;314:729–35. Storb R, Deeg H, Pepe M et al. Methotrexate and cyclosporine versus cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease in patients given HLA-identical marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of a controlled trial. Blood 1989;73:1729–34. Chao N, Schmidt G, Niland J et al. Cyclosporine, methotrexate and prednisone compared with cyclosporine and prednisone for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1225–30. Anasetti C, Etzioni R, Petersdorf E et al. Marrow transplantation from unrelated volunteer donors. Annu Rev Med 1995;46:169–79. Sierra J, Storer B, Hansen J et al. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: an update of the Seattle experience. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26:397–404. Kernan N, Bartsch G, Ash R et al. Analysis of 462 transplantations from unrelated donors facilitated by the
182
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D Bunjes
National Marrow Donor Program. N Engl J Med 1993;328:593–602. Rodt H, Thierfelder S, Eulitz M. Anti-lymphocyte antibodies and marrow transplantation.III. Effect of heterologous anti-brain antibodies in acute secondary disease in mice. J Immunol 1974;4:25–9. Korngold R, Sprent J. Lethal graft-vs-host disease following bone marrow transplantation across minor histocompatibility barriers in mice. Prevention by removing mature T-cells from marrow. J Exp Med 1978;148:1687–98. Reisner Y, Kapoor N, Kirkpatrick D et al. Transplantation for acute leukaemia with HLA-A and B nonidentical parental marrow cells fractionated with soybean agglutinin and sheep red blood cells. Lancet 1981;ii:327–31. Prentice H, Janossy G, Price-Jones L et al. Depletion of T lymphocytes in donor marrow prevents significant graftversus-host disease in matched allogeneic leukaemic marrow transplant recipients. Lancet 1984;ii:472–5. Waldmann H, Hale G, Cividalli et al. Elimination of graftversus-host disease by in vitro depletion of alloreactive lymphocytes with a monoclonal rat anti-human lymphocyte antibody. Lancet 1984;ii:483–6. Filipovich A, Youle R, Neville D et al. Ex-vivo treatment of donor marrow with anti-T-cell immunotoxins for prevention of graft-versus-host disease. Lancet 1984; i:469–72. Heit W, Bunjes D, Wiesneth M et al. Ex vivo T-cell depletion with the monoclonal antibody CAMPATH-1 plus human complement effectively prevents acute graft-versushost disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol 1986;64:479–86. O Reilly R, Brochstein J, Collins N et al. Evaluation of HLA-haplotype dispararate parental marrow grafts depleted of T cells by differential agglutination with a soybean lectin and E-rosette depletion for the treatment of severe combined immunodeficiency. Vox Sang 1986;51:81–6. Aversa F, Tabilio A, Terenzi A et al. Successful engraftment of T-cell-depleted haploidentical three loci incompatible transplants in leukaemia patients by addition of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating-factor mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells to marrow inoculum. Blood 1994;84:3948–55. Martin P, Hansen J, Torok-Storb B et al. Graft failure in patients receiving T cell-depleted HLA-identical allogeneic marrow transplants. Bone Marrow Transplant 1988;3:445–56. Mitsuyasu R, Champlin R, Gale R et al. Treatment of donor bone marrow with monoclonal anti T cell antibody and complement for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Ann Intern Med 1986;105:20–26. Apperley J, Jones L, Hale G et al. Bone marrow transplantation for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: T cell depletion with CAMPATH-1 reduces the incidence of
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
graft-versus-host disease but may increase the risk of leukaemic relapse. Bone Marrow Transplant 1986;1:53–66. Keever C, Small T, Flomenberg N et al. Immune reconstitution following bone marrow reconstitution: comparison of recipients of T cell depleted marrow with recipients of conventional marrow grafts. Blood 1989;73:1340–50. Antin J, Bierer B, Smith B, Ferrara J et al. Selective depletion of bone marrow T lymphocytes with anti-CD5 monoclonal antibodies: effective prophylaxis for graftversus-host disease in patients with haematological malignancies. Blood 1991;78:2139–49. Marmont A, Horowitz M, Gale R et al. T-cell depletion of HLA-identical transplants in leukemia. Blood 1991; 78:2120–30. Bunjes D, Heit W, Arnold R et al. Evidence for the involvement of host-derived OKT8-positive T cells in the rejection of T-depleted, HLA-identical bone marrow grafts. Transplantation 1987;43:501–5. Bunjes D, Wiesneth M, Hertenstein B et al. Graft failure after T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation: clinical and immunological characteristics and response to immunosuppressive therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 1990;6:309–14. Bunjes D, Theobald M, Wiesneth M et al. Graft rejection by a population of primed CDw52- host T cells after in vivo/ex vivo T-depleted bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993;12:209–15. Kernan N, Flomenberg N, Dupont B, O’Reilly R. Graft rejection in recipients of T-cell-depleted HLA-nonidentical marrow transplants for leukaemia. Transplantation 1987;43:842–7. Kernan N, Bordignon C, Heller G et al. Graft failure after T-cell-depleted human leukocyte antigen identical marrow transplants for leukemia: I. Analysis of risk factors and results of secondary transplants. Blood 1989;74:2227–36. Bordignon C, Keever C, Small T et al. Graft failure after T-cell-depleted human leukocyte antigen identical marrow transplants for leukaemia: II. In vitro analyses of host effector mechanisms. Blood 1989;74:2237–43. Fleischhauer K, Kernan N, O Reilly R et al. Bone marrow graft rejection by host-derived allocytotoxic T lymphocytes recognizes a single amino acid at position 156 of the HLAB44 class I antigen. N Eng J Med 1990;323:1818–22. Marijt W, Kernan N, Diaz-Barrientos T et al. Multiple minor histocompatibility antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell clones can be generated during graft rejection after HLAidentical bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995;16:125–32. Voogt P, Fibbe W, Marijt W et al. Rejection of bone-marrow graft by recipient-derived cytotoxic T lymphocytes against minor histocompatibility antigens. Lancet 1990;335:131–4. Voltarelli J, Przepiorka D, Shankar P et al. CD8+/DR+/CD25-T-lymphocytes associated wiith marrow graft failure. Bone Marrow Transplant 1989;4:647–52.
T-cell depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplants
42 Reisner Y. Engraftment of T-cell depleted bone marrow in murine models for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. In: Champlin R, editor. Bone marrow transplantation. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 1990:9–25. 43 Lapidot T, Singer T, Salomon O et al. Booster irradiation to the spleen following total body irradiation. J Immunol 1988;141:2619–24. 44 Lapidot T, Terenzi A, Singer T et al. Enhancement by dimethyl myleran of donor type chimerism in murine recipients of bone marrow allografts. Blood 1989;73:2025–32. 45 Terenzi A, Lubin I, Lapidot T et al. Enhancement of T celldepleted bone marrow allografts by thiotepa. Transplantation 1990;50:717–20. 46 Schwartz E, Lapidot T, Gozes D et al. Abrogation of bone marrow allograft resistance in mice by increased total body irradiation correlates with eradication of host clonable T cells and alloreactive cytotoxic precursors. J Immunol 1987;138:460–5. 47 Champlin R, Ho W, Mitsuyasu R et al. Graft failure and leukaemia relapse following T lymphocyte-depleted bone marrow transplants: effect of intensification of immunosuppressive conditioning. Transplant Proc 1987;19:2616–19. 48 Burnett A, Hann I, Alcorn M et al. Prevention of graftversus-host disease by ex vivo T cell depletion: reduction in graft failure with augmented total body irradiation. Leukaemia 1988;2:300–3. 49 Slavin S, Or R, Naparstek E et al. New approaches for the prevention of rejection and graft-versus-host disease in clinical bone marrow transplantation. Israel J Med Sci 1986;22:264–7. 50 Naparstek E, Or R, Nagler A et al. T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute leukaemia using CAMPATH-1 antibodies and post transplant administration of donors perpheral blood lymphocytes for prevention of relapse. Br J Haematol 1995;89:506–15. 51 Jacobs P, Wood L, Fullard L et al. T-cell depletion by exposure to CAMPATH-1G in vitro prevents graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994;13:763. 52 Novitzky N, Thomas V, Hale G, Waldmann H. Ex vivo depletion of T cells from bone marrow grafts with CAMPATH-1 in acute leukaemia. Transplantation 1999;67:620–6. 53 Fischer A, Griscelli C, Le Deist F et al. Prevention of graft failure by an anti-LFA1 monoclonal antibody in HLAmismatched bone marrow transplantation. Lancet 1986;ii: 1058–62. 54 Baume D, Kuentz M, Pico J et al. Failure of a CD 18/antiLFA-1 monoclonal antibody infusion to prevent graft rejection in leukaemic patients receiving T-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1989; 47:472–4. 55 Cobbold S, Martin G, Waldmann H. Monoclonal antibodies for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease and marrow graft rejection.The depletion of T cell subsets in vitro and in vivo. Transplantation 1986;42:239–47.
183
56 Theobald M, Hoffmann T, Bunjes D, Heit W. Comparative analysis of in vivo T cell depletion with radiotherapy, combination chemotherapy, and the monoclonal antibody CAMPATH-1G, using limiting dilution methodology. Transplantation 1990;49:553–9. 57 Papadopoulos E, Carabasi M, Castro-Malespina H et al. Tcell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as post-remission therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: freedom from relapse in the absence of graft-versus-host disease. Blood 1998;91:1083–90. 58 Aversa F, Terenzi A, Carotti A et al. Improved outcome with T-cell depleted bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1545–50. 59 Bunjes D, Hertenstein B, Wiesneth M et al. In vivo/ex vivo T cell depletion reduces the morbidity of allogeneic transplantation in patients with acute leukaemias in first remission without increasing the risk of treatment failure: comparison with cyclosporin/methotrexate. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995;15:563–8. 60 Hale G, Zhang M-J, Bunjes D et al. Improving the outcome of bone marrow transplantation by using CD52 monoclonal antibodies to prevent graft-versus-host disease and graft rejection. Blood 1998;92:4581–90. 61 De Witte T, Gratwohl A, Vanderlely N. Recombinant human granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) reduces infection-related mortality after allogeneic T-depleted bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1991;7:83–9. 62 Champlin R, Winston H, Gajewski J et al. Selective depletion of CD8+ T lymphocytes for prevention of graftversus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1990;76:418–23. 63 Nimer S, Gajewski J, Giorgi J et al. Selective depletion of CD8+ cells for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. A randomized trial. Transplantation 1994;57:82–7. 64 Martin P. Donor CD8 cells prevent allogeneic marrow graft rejection in mice: potential implications for marrow transplantation in humans. J Exp Med 1993;178:703–12. 65 Verdonck L, Dekker A, De Gast G et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with a fixed low number of T cells in the marrow graft. Blood 1994;83:3090–6. 66 Barrett A, Mavroudis D, Tisdale J et al. T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation and delayed T cell add-back to control acute GvHD and conserve a graft-versusleukemia effect. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;21:543–51. 67 Bachar-Lustig E, Rachamim N, Li H-W et al. Megadose of T cell-depleted bone marrow overcomes MHC barriers in sublethally irradiated mice. Nature Med 1995;1:1268–73. 68 Uharek L, Gassmann W, Glass B et al. Influence of cell dose and graft-versus-host reactivity on rejection rates after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1992;79:1912. 69 Sierra J, Storer B, Hansen J et al. Transplantation of marrow cells from unrelated donors for treatment of high-risk acute
184
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
D Bunjes
leukemia: the effect of leukemic burden, donor HLAmatching, and marrow cell dose. Blood 1997;89:4226–35. Bahceci E, Read E, Leitman S et al. CD34+ cell dose predicts relapse and survival after T-cell-depleted HLAidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 2000;108:408–14. Mavroudis D, Read E, Cotter-Fox M et al. CD34+ cell dose predicts survival, postransplant morbidity and rate of hematologic recovery after allogeneic marrow transplants for hematologic malignancies. Blood 1996;88:3223–9. Singhal S, Powles R, Treleaven J et al. A low CD34+ cell dose results in higher mortality and poorer survival after blood or marrow stem cell transplantation from HLAidentical siblings: should 2 3 106 CD34+ cells/kg be considered the minimum threshold? Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;26:489–96. Champlin R, Passweg J, Zhang M-J et al. T-cell depletion of bone marrow transplants for leukemia from donors other than HLA-identical siblings: advantage of T-cell antibodies with narrow specificities. Blood 2000;95:3996–4003. Ash R, Casper J, Chitambar C et al. Successful allogeneic transplantation of T-cell depleted bone marrow from closely HLA-matched unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 1990;322:485–94. Green A, Clarke E, Hunt L et al. Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who receive T-cell-depleted HLA mismatched marrow allografts from unrelated donors have an increased incidence of primary graft failure but a similar overall transplant outcome. Blood 1999;94:2236–46. Oakhill A, Pamphilon D, Potter M et al. Unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in second complete remission. Br J Haematol 1996;94:574–8. O Reilly R, Keever C, Kernan N et al. HLA nonidentical T cell depleted marrow transplants: A comparison of results in patients for leukaemia and severe combined immunodeficiency disease. Transplant Proc 1987;19:55–60. Aversa F, Tabilio A, Velardi A et al. Treatment of high-risk acute leukemia with T-cell-depleted stem cells from related donors with one fully mismatched HLA-haplotype. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1186–93. Handgretinger R, Schumm M, Lang P et al. Transplantation of megadoses of purified haploidentical stem cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999;872:351–60. Bunjes D, Duncker C, Wiesneth M et al. CD34+ selected cells in mismatched stem cell transplantation: a single centre experience of haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;25 (Suppl. 2):9–11. Rachamim N, Gan J, Segall H et al. Tolerance induction by megadose hematopoietic transplants: donor-type human CD34+ stem cells induce potent specific reductions of host-
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
anti-donor cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors in mixed lymphocyte culture. Transplantation 1998;65:1386–96. Henslee-Downey P, Abhyankar S, Parrish R et al. Use of partially mismatched related donors extends access to allogeneic marrow transplant. Blood 1997;89:3864–72. Goldman J, Gale R, Horowitz M et al. Bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase: Increased risk of relapse associated with T celldepletion. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:806–14. Wiesneth M, Hertenstein B, Bunjes D et al. T-cell depletion versus methotrexate as GvHD-prophylaxis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for leukaemia. Eur J Haematol 1988;41:243–9. Bunjes D. T cell depletion of allogeneic stem cell grafts with anti-CD 52 monoclonal antibodies. Transfus Sci 2000; 23:151–62. Young J, Papadopoulos E, Cunningham I et al. T-celldepleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in adults with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia in first remission. Blood 1992;79:3380–7. Horowitz M, Gale R, Sondel P et al. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1990; 75:555–62. Gale R, Horowitz M, Ash R et al. Identical-twin bone marrow transplants for leukemia. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:646–52. Falkenburg J, Goselink H, Van der Harst D et al. Growth inhibition of clonogenic leukemic precursor cells by minor histocompatibility antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 1991;174:27–33. Faber L, Van der Hoeven J, Goulmy E et al. Recognition of clonogenic leukemic cells, remission bone marrow and HLA-identical donor marrow by CD8+ or CD4+ minor histocompatibility antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Clin Invest 1995;96:877–83. Van der Harst D, Goulmy E, Falkenburg J et al. Recognition of minor histocompatibility antigens on lymphocytic and myeloid leukemic cells by cytotoxic T-cell clones. Blood 1994;83:1060–6. Dolstra H, Fredrix H, Preijers F et al. Recognition of a B cell leukemia-associated minor histocompatibility antigen by CTL. J Immunol 1997:560–5. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Grignani F, Arienti F et al. Human CD4 lymphocytes specifically recognize a peptide representing the fusion region of the hybrid protein pml/RAR present in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Blood 1993;81:1369–75. Slavin S, Naparstek E, Nagler A et al. Allogeneic cell therapy with donor peripheral blood cells and recombinant human interleukin-2 to treat leukemia relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1996;87:2195–204. Kolb H, Mittermüller J, Clemm C et al. Donor leukocyte transfusions for treatment of recurrent chronic myelognous
T-cell depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplants
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
leukemia in marrow transplant patients. Blood 1990; 76:2462–5. Kolb H, Schattenberg A, Goldman J et al. Graft-versusleukemia effect of donor lymphocyte transfusions in marrow grafted patients. Blood 1995;86:2041–50. Collins R, Shpilberg O, Drobyski W et al. Donor leukocyte infusions in 140 patients with relapsed malignancy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:433–44. Szer J, Grigg A, Philips G, Sheridan W. Donor leukocyte infusions after chemotherapy for patients relapsing with acute leukaemia following allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993;11:109–11. Soiffer R, Fairclough D, Robertson M et al. CD6-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia in first remission. Blood 1997;89:3039–47. Clift R, Buckner C, Appelbaum F et al. Allogeneic marrow transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a randomized trial of two irradiation regimens. Blood 1990;76:1867–71. Soiffer R, Dear K, Rabinowe S et al. Hepatic dysfunction following T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1991;52:1014–19. Frassoni F, Labopin M, Gluckman E et al. Results of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia have improved in Europe with time — a report of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;17:13–18. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. Blood 1998;92:2322–33. Bloomfield C, Lawrence D, Byrd J et al. Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype. Cancer Res 1998;58:4173–9. Gale R, Horowitz M, Weiner R et al. Impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on outcome of bone marrow transplantats in acute myelogenous leukemia in first remission. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995;16:203–8. Ferrant A, Labopin M, Frassoni F et al. Karyotype in acute myeloblastic leukemia: prognostic significance for bone marrow transplantation in first remission: a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study. Blood 1997;90:2931–8. Michallet M, Thomas X, Vernant J et al. Long-term outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced stage acute myeloblastic leukemia : a retrospective study of 379 patients reported to the Sociètè Francaise de Greffe de Moelle (SFGM). Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;26:1157–63.
185
108 Bunjes D, Buchmann I, Duncker C et al. 188 Re-labeled anti-CD66 (a,b,c,e) monoclonal antibody to intensify the conditioning regimen prior to stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: results of a phase I–II study. Blood In press. 109 Appelbaum F, Matthews D, Eary J et al. The use of radiolabelled anti-CD33 antibody to augment marrow irradiation prior to marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia. Transplantation 1992;54:629–33. 110 Matthews D, Appelbaum F, Eary J et al. Radiolabeled antiCD45 monoclonal antibodies target lymphohematopoetic tissue in the macaque. Blood 1991;78:1864. 111 Matthews D, Badger C, Fisher D et al. Selective radiation of hematolymphoid tissue delivered by anti-CD 45 antibody. Cancer Res 1992;52:1228. 112 Matthews D, Appelbaum F, Eary J et al. Targeted hematopoietic irradiation using 131-I-anti-CD45 antibody in patients with acute leukemia undergoing marrow transplantation. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1996;37:627. 113 Scheinberg D, Lovett D, Divgi C et al. A phase I trial of monoclonal antibody M195 in acute myelogenous leukemia: specific bone marrow targeting and internalization of radionuclide. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:478–90. 114 Papadopoulos E, Caron P, Castro-Malaspina H et al. Results of allogeneic bone marrow transplant following 131 I-M 195/Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) in patients with advanced/refractory myeloid malignancies. Blood 1993;82:80a. 115 Jurcic J, Caron P, Nikula T et al. Radiolabeled anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody M195 for myeloid leukemias. Cancer Res (Suppl) 1995;55:5908a–5910a. 116 Matthews D, Appelbaum F, Eary J et al. Phase I study of 131 I-anti CD45 antibody plus cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation for advanced acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 1999;94:1237–47. 117 Ruffner K, Matthews D. Current uses of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of acute leukemia. Sem Oncol 2000;27:531–9. 118 Powles R, Mehta J, Kulkarni S et al. Allogeneic blood and bone marrow stem cell transplantation in haematological malignant diseases: a randomized trial. Lancet 2000; 355:1231–7. 119 Bensinger W, Martin P, Storer B et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med 2001;344:175–81. 120 Drobyski W, Hessner M, Klein J et al. T-cell depletion plus salvage immunotherapy with donor leukocyte infusions as a strategy to treat chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia patients undergoing HLA-identical sibling marrow transplantation. Blood 1999;94:434–41.
186
D Bunjes
121 Sehn L, Alyea E, Weller E et al. Comparative outcome of T-cell-depleted and non T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: impact of donor lymphocyte infusions. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:561–8. 122 Novitzky N, Rubinstein R, Hallett J et al. Bone marrow transplantation depleted of T cells followed by repletion with incremental doses of donor lymphocytes for relapsing patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Transplantation 2000;69:1358–63. 123 Small T. Immunologic reconstitution following stem cell transplantation. Curr Opin Haematol 1996;3:461–5. 124 Small T, Papadopoulos E, Boulad F et al. Comparison of immune reconstitution after unrelated and related T-celldepleted bone marrow transplantation: effect of patient age and donor leukocyte infusions. Blood 1999;93:467–80. 125 Lowdell M, Craston R, Ray N et al. The effect of T cell depletion with CAMPATH 1M on immune reconstitution after chemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplant as treatment for leukaemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;21:679–86. 126 Davison G, Novitzky N, Kline A et al. Immune reconstitution after allogeneic marrow transplantation depleted of T cells. Transplantation 2000;69:1341–7. 127 De Gast G, Gratama J, Verdonck L et al. The influence of T cell depletion on recovery of T cell proliferation to herpes viruses and candida after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1989;48:111–15. 128 Storek J, Gooley T, Witherspoon R et al. Infectious morbidity in long-term survivors of allogeneic marrow transplantation is associated with low CD4 T cell counts. Am J Haematol 1997;54:131–8. 129 Engelhard D, Or R, Strauus N et al. Cytomegalovirus infection and disease after T cell depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for malignant hematologic diseases. Transplant Proc 1989;21:3101–2. 130 Couriel D, Canosa J, Engler H et al. Early reactivation of cytomegalovirus and high risk of interstitial pneumonitis following T-depleted BMT for adults with hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;18:347. 131 Childs R, Sanchez C, Engler H et al. High incidence of adeno-and polyomavirus-induced hemorrhagic cystitis in bone marrow transplantation for hematological malignancies following T cell depletion and cyclosporine. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;22:889–93. 132 Mackall C, Granger L, Sheard M et al. T-cell regeneration after bone marrow transplantation: differential CD45 isoform expression on thymic-derived versus thymicindependent progeny. Blood 1993;82:2585–94. 133 Mackall C, Gress R. Pathways of T-cell regeneration in mice and humans: implications for bone marrow transplantation and immunotherapy. Immunol Rev 1997;157:61–72. 134 Storek J, Witherspoon R, Storb R. T cell reconstitution after bone marrow transplantation in adult patients does
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142 143
144
145
146
147
148
149
not resemble T cell development in early life. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995;16. Mackall C, Fleisher T, Brown M et al. Age, thymopoeisis and CD4+T-lymphocyte regeneration after intensive chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 1995;332:143–9. Hakim F, Cepeda R, Kaimel S et al. Constraints on CD4 recovery postchemotherapy in adults: thymic insufficiency and apoptotic decline of expanded peripheral CD4 cells. Blood 1997;90:3789–98. Heitger A, Greinix H, Mannhalter C et al. Requirement of residual thymus to restore normal T-cell subsets after human allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 2000;69:2366–73. Roux E, Dumont-Girard F, Starobinski M et al. Recovery of immune reactivity after T-cell-depleted bone marrow depends on thymic activity. Blood 2000;96:2299–303. Roux E, Helg C, Chapuis B et al. T-cell repertoire complexity after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Hum Immunol 1996;48:135–8. Gorsky J, Yassai M, Zhu X et al. Circulating T cell repertoire complexity in normal individuals and bone marrow recipients analysed by CDR3 size spectratyping. J Immunol 1994;152:5109–19. Verfuerth S, Peggs K, Vyas P et al. Longitudinal monitoring of immune reconstitution by CDR3 size spectratyping after T-cell-depleted allogeneic one marrow transplant and the effect of donor lymphocyte infusions on T cell repertoire. Blood 2000;95:3990–5. Mackall C, Gress R. Thymic aging and T cell regeneration. Immunol Rev 1997;160:91–102. Mackall C, Punt J, Morgan P, Farr A, Gress R. Thymic function in young/old chimeras: substantial thymic T cell regenerative capacity despite irreversible age-associated thymic involution. Eur J Immunol 1998;28:1886–93. Poulin J-F, Viswanathan MN, Harris JM et al. Direct evidence of thymic function in adult humans. J Exp Med 1999;190:479–86. Walter E, Greenberg P, Gilbert M et al. Reconstitution of cellular immunity against cytomegalovirus in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow by transfer of T cell clones from the donor. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 1038–44. Riddell S, Watanabe K, Goodrich J et al. Restoration of viral immunity in immunodeficient humans by adoptive transfer of T cell clones. Science 1992;257:238–41. Rooney C, Smith C, Ng C et al. Infusion of cytotoxic T cells for the prevention and treatment of Epstein–Barr virus-induced lymphoma in allogeneic transplant recipients. Blood 1998;92:1549–55. Koh M, Prentice H, Lowdell M. Selective removal of alloreactive cells from haematopoietic stem cell grafts: graft engineering for GVHD prophylaxis. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999;23:1071–8. Datta A, Barrett A, Jiang Y et al. Distinct T cell populations
T-cell depleted allogeneic stem-cell transplants
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162 163
distinguish chronic myeloid leukemia cells from lymphocytes in the same individual: a model for separating GVHD fromGVLreactions.BoneMarrowTransplant1994;14:517–24. Bonini C, Ferrari G, Verzeletti S et al. HSV-TK gene transfer into donor lymphocytes for control of allogeneic graft-versus-leukemia. Science 1997;276:1719–24. Guinan E, Boussiotis V, Neuberg D et al. Transplantation of anergic histoincompatible bone marrow allografts. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1704–14. Soiffer R, Murray C, Gonin R, Ritz J. Effect of low-dose interleukin-2 on disease relapse after T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1994;84:964–71. Murray R, Kurilla M, Brooks J et al. Identification of target antigens for the human T-cell response to Epstein–Barr virus (EBV): implications for the control of EBV-positive malignancies. J Exp Med 1992;176:157–68. Curtis R, Travis L, Rowlings P et al. Risk of lymphoproliferative disorders after bone marrow transplantation : a multiinstitutional study. Blood 1999;94:2208–16. Hale G, Waldmann H. Risks of developing Epstein–Barr virus-related lymphoproliferative disorders after T-celldepleted marrow transplants. Blood 1998;91:3079–89. Cavazzano-Calvo M, Benoussian D, Jabado N et al. Prevention of EBV-induced B lymphoproliferative disorder by ex-vivo marrow B cell depletion in HLA-phenoidentical or nonidentical T-depleted bone marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol 1998;103:543–51. Rooney C, Loftin S, Holladay M et al. Early identification of Epstein–Barr virus-associated post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease. Br J Haematol 1995;89:98–103. Lucas K, Burton A, Zimmermann S, et al. Semiquantatative Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) polymerase chain reaction for the determination of patients at risk for EBV-induced lymphoproliferative disease after stem cell transplantation. Blood 1998;91:3654. Kuehnle I, Huls M, Liu Z et al. CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) for therapy of Epstein–Barr virus lymphoma after hemopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Blood 2000;95: 1502–5. Milpied N, Vasseur B, Parquet N et al. Humanized antiCD 20 monoclonal antibody (Rituximab) in post transplant B-lymphoproliferative disorder: a retrospective analysis of 32 patients. Ann Oncol 2000;11(Suppl. 1):113–16. Papadopoulos E, Ladanyi M, Emanuel D et al. Infusions of donor leukocytes to treat Epstein–Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disorders after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1185-91. Heslop H, Brenner M, Rooney C. Donor T cells to treat EBV-associated lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1994;331:679–80. Schmitz N, Dreger P, Suttorp M et al. Primary transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by filgastrim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). Blood 1995;85:1666.
187
164 Körbling M, Przepiorka D, Huh Y et al. Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia and lymphoma: potential advantages of blood over marrow allografts. Blood 1995;85:1659–65. 165 Bensinger W, Weaver C, Appelbaum F et al. Transplantation of allogeneic blood stem cells mobilized by recombinant human recombinant granulocyte colonystimulating factor. Blood 1995;85:1413. 166 Vigorito A, Azevedo W, Marques J et al. A randomized, prospective comparison of allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of haematological malignancies. 1998; Bone Marrow Transplant 22:1145–51. 167 Blaise D, Kuentz M, Fortanier C et al. Bone Marrow (BMT) versus lenogastrim-primed blood cell (BCT) allogeneic transplantation: a randomized trial from the Sociètè Francaise De Greffe de Moelle. Blood 1999;94 (Suppl. 1): 608a (Abstract 2705). 168 Champlin R, Schmitz N, Horowitz M et al. Blood stem cells compared with bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic cells for allogeneic transplantation. Blood 2000;95:3702–9. 169 Link H, Arseniev L, Bähre O et al. Transplantation of allogeneic CD34+ blood cells. Blood 1996;87:4303–9. 170 Bensinger W, Buckner C, Shanon-Dorcy K et al. Transplantation of allogeneic CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells in patients with advanced hematologic malignancy. Blood 1996;87:4132. 171 Finke J, Brugger W, Bertz H et al. Allogeneic transplantation of positively selected peripheral blood progenitors from matched related donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996;18:1081. 172 Urbano-Ispizua A, Rozman C, Martinez C et al. Rapid engraftment without significant graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic transplantation of CD34+ selected cells from peripheral blood. Blood 1997;89:3967–73. 173 Urbano-Ispizua A, Solano C, Brunet S et al. Allogeneic transplantation of selected CD34+ cells from peripheral blood: experience of 62 cases using immunoadsorption of immunomagnetic technique. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;22:519–25. 174 Urbano-Ispizua A, Rozman C, Pimentel P et al. The number of donor CD+ cells is the most important factor for graft failure after allogeneic transplantation of CD34+ selected cells from peripheral blood of HLA-identical siblings. Blood 2001;97:383–7. 175 Hale G, Jacobs P, Wood L et al. CD52 antibodies for prevention of graft-versus-host disease and graft rejection following transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;26:69–76. 176 Kottaridis P, Milligan D, Chopra R et al. In vivo CAMPATH-1H prevents graft-versus-host disease following nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation. Blood 2000;96:2419–25.
188
D Bunjes
177 Ottinger H, Beelen D, Scheulen B et al. Improved immune reconstitution after allotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow. Blood 1996;88:2775. 178 Bunjes D, Wiesneth M, Von Harsdorf S et al. T-cell depleted allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplants in 30 patients with haematological malignancies: benefits and risks. Blood 1997;90 (Suppl 1):103a (Abstract 454). 179 Pan L, Delmonte J, Jalonen C, Ferrara J. Pretreatment of donor mice with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor polarizes donor T lymphocytes toward type-2 cytokine production and reduces severity of experimental graftversus-host disease. Blood 1995;86:4422–9. 180 Mielcarek M, Martin P, Torok-Storb B. Suppression of alloantigen-induced T-cell proliferation by CD14+ cells derived from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF)-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Blood 1997;89:1629–34. 181 Arpinati M, Green C, Heimfeld S et al. Granulocytecolony stimulating factor mobilizes T helper 2-inducing dendritic cells. Blood 2000;95:2484–90.
182 Miller J, Prosper F, McCullar V. Natural killer (NK) cells are functionally abnormal and NK cell progenitors are diminished in granulocyte colony-stimulating factormobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell collections. Blood 1997;90:3098–105. 183 Volpi I, Perrucio K, Ruggeri L et al. G-CSF blocks Il-12 production by antigen-presenting cells: implications for improved immune reconstitution after haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation. Blood 1999;94 (Suppl. 1): 640a (Abstract 2841). 184 Ringden O, Remberger M, Runde V et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors : a comparison with marrow transplantation. Blood 1999;94:455–64. 185 Mehta J, Powles R, Mitchell P et al. Graft failure after bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors using busulphan and cyclophosphamide for conditioning. Bone Marrow Transplant 1994;13:583–7. 186 Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Casucci M et al. Role of natural killer cell alloreactivity in HLA-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 1999;94:333–9.