The effect of epidural anesthesia on oxytocin-induced labor

The effect of epidural anesthesia on oxytocin-induced labor

The effect of epidural anesthesia on oxytocin-induced J. S. HENRY, M. B. KINGSTON, G. B. MAUGHAN, Montreal, Quebec JR., labor M.D. M.D. M...

882KB Sizes 0 Downloads 37 Views

The effect of epidural anesthesia on oxytocin-induced J.

S.

HENRY,

M.

B.

KINGSTON,

G.

B.

MAUGHAN,

Montreal,

Quebec

JR.,

labor M.D. M.D.

M.D.

Eighteen cases of induced labor at or near term were monitored with continuous amniotic pressure recordings, and the intensity, frequency, and uterine activity of contractions were measured. Epidural anesthesia was given at varying points in the first stage and maintained untiE delivery, and the progress of labor in terms of timedilatation and time-uterine work was measured in each case. No significant changes were noted in contractility or progress of labor in the series. Theoretical considerations suggest that in this series none of the known factors which change contractility were operative.

E P I D u R A L anesthesia has in recent years played an increasingly important role in the management of labor and dehvery. In spite of its common use there is still controversy over the effect it has on contractility and on the progress of labor. A few recent studies have compared the length of labor in cases with epidural and those without. Heinrichs, Kornmesser, and Tullochl reported shorter labors for both primiparas and multiparas, although they stated that Pitocin was given to many patients to counteract the secondary inertia which may follow epidural anesthesia. Nielsen and associates2 observed that a transient slowing and weakening of contractions might occur, although contractions usually remained strong and effective. Cowles3 found an ac-

celeration in primiparous labor but no change in multiparas, compared with a control group. Several recent studies have reported objective measurements of contractility. Vasicka and Kretchmer4 measured amniotic pressure in 9 patients given epidural anesthesia during oxytocin induced labor. They found no over-all inhibitory or stimulating effect on contractility, although they noted an almost consistent temporary fall in the intensity of contractions. Vasicka and co-workers’ further reported on 18 cases and noted again no important changes providing the maternal arterial pressure was maintained within normal limits. Acute postepidural hypotension resulted in decreased uterine contractility. This study is presented to add further objective evidence of the effect of epidural anesthesia on contractility and to attempt to correlate the contractility with the progress of labor.

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Victoria Hospital and McGill University. The work presented in this paper was aided by the Medical Research Council of Canada Grant No. 298-88 and by a grant from the Banting Research Foundation.

Material Eighteen patients who were selected for induction of labor at or near term were chosen for this study. Table I outlines the significant details.

Presented at the Twenty-second Annual Meeting of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Jasper, Alberta, June 17-19, 1966. 350

Epidural

Table I. Ciinical

__-

I

Case No. 64

(

7

details

39

1

in oxytocin-induced

labor

351

of the 18 cases

I Age

anesthesia

I Parity G4,

( PO

Weeks

Dilatation at epidural (cm.)

Maternal blood pressure

Drug and concentration

42

10

Xylocaine

1%

Normotension

Normotension

64 22

22

Gl

37

5

Xylocaine

1%

65 4

35

Gl

40

7

Xylocaine

1%

65

10

21

Gl

39

6

Xylocaine

1%

Normotension

65

14

25

Gl

40

5

Xylocaine

1%

Normotension

65 20

22

Gl

41

6

Xylocaine

2%

Normotension

66 3

22

Gl

38

4

Xylocaine

1%

Normotension

66 5

21

Gl

40

6

Xylocaine

1%

Normotension

66 6

18

Gl

42

6

Xylocaine

1%

Normotension

64

17

24

G3,

P2

42

8

Xylocaine

1%

Normotension

64 20

28

G2.

Pl

40

5

Xylocaine

2 “7

Normotension

64 21

25

G4,

P2

40

7

Propitocaine

2%

Normotension

64 23

21

40

5

Propitocaine

2%

Normotension

65 3

26

P2

40

8

Carbocaine

2%

Normotension

65

7

22

P2, Al

40

6

Carbocaine

2%

Normotension

65 9

42

G6,

P4

38

6

Xylocaine

2%

Normotension

65

16

33

G3,

P2

41

Xylocaine

2%

Normotension

65

18

35

G3,

I’2

41

Xylocaine

2%

Hypotension -80

G3,

G3,

G4,

Pl,

Al

Remarks Low forceps, 2.860 grams, Apgar 10 Diabetes, hydramnios, low forceps, cord around neck, 4,060 grams Apgar 5 Difficult midforceps, 3,621 grams, Apgar 10 Low forceps, 3,200 grams, Apgar 9 Low forceps, 3.175 grams, Apgar 10 Mid forceps, 3.510 grams, Apgar 10 Spontaneous, 3010 grams, Apgar 10 Low forceps, 3,360 grams, Apgar 9 Spontaneous, 3,180 grams, Apgar 9 Low forceps, 3.600 grams, Apgar 9 Low forceps, 4,000 grams, Apgar 10 Spontaneous, 2.960 grams, Apgar 10 Spontaneous, 3,680 grams, Apgar 10 Spontaneous, 3,180 grams, Apgar 10 Spontaneous, 3,960 grams, Apgar 10 Rh negative with antibodies. spontaneous, 3,760 grams, Apgar 10 Low forceps, 3,190 grams. Apgar 10 Spontaneous, 3,360 grams, .4pgar 10

352

Henry, Kingston,

All our patients graphic examination and fetal maturity. centas had already study.

February 1, 1967 Am. J. Obst. & Gynec.

and Maughan

are submitted to radiofor placental position Those with anterior plabeen excluded from the

Methods

Before instrumentation for recording, each patient received a continuous infusion of Demerol and chlorpromazine at the initial rate of 0.1 mg. of Demerol and 0.05 mg. of chlorpromazine per minute and this continued until the epidural anesthetic was given. Analgesia in this amount does not significantly influence normal contractility.6* 7 Contractions were recorded by means of a fluid-filled polyvinyl catheter passed transabdominally into the amniotic cavity. The fetal heart rate was recorded with a cardiotachometer fed from the fetal ECG complex obtained by direct electrode contact with the fetus. Amniotic pressure and fetal heart rate were recorded on a Sanborn polygraph (Fig. 1). The fetal heart rate served in these cases

Fig.

1. Sample

tracing

of amniotic

fluid

pressure

as a monitor of fetal well-being. Its relation to contractility with epidural anesthesia was the subject of a previous study.* Labor was induced with a constant rate infusion of oxytocin beginning at 1 or 2 milliunits per minute and increasing to rates of 4 or 8 milliunits as needed. Cervical dilatation was assessed by sterile vaginal examination, and at a suitable point in the labor the membranes were ruptured artificially. At a suitable level of contractility the infusion rate of oxytocin was maintained constant and the patient’s position was not changed,9 in an effort to reduce to a minimum the variables which might affect contractility. Lumbar epidural anesthesia was performed by staff anesthetists and continued until after delivery. under their supervision. Maternal blood pressure and level of anesthesia were determined by the usual clinical methods. Anesthesia was begun when the patient became uncomfortable (rather than at a uniform dilatation) in order to simulate the

and fetal

heart

rate.

Volume Number

97 3

Epidural

clinical situation. The level of anesthesia was from T,, or T,, to L, or L, in all patients. Blood pressure was maintained at the preanesthetic level in all but one patient, who exhibited a fall to 80/O mm. Hg. This was rest.ored to normal with Methedrine. Results Contractility. First fifteen contractions during anesthsia. The fifteen contractions INTENSITY

BEFORE

I

WRING

,

PhttMO Multipam Awage

50

[BEFORE

~ DURING

t ‘\

‘\.

----Y--1 1 ‘\

---. I

, CABEB SNWtNG

mmH9

70

1

epidural before

IO

I

I

I

CASES SHOWHG

MXEABE

DECREASE

Fig. 2. Intensity of 15 contractions before compared with 15 contractions during epidural anesthesia.

BEFORE

Primipom Multipam Abropr

in oxytocin-induced

labor

353

and the first fifteen contractions during the epidural anesthesia were compared for changes in intensity, frequency, and uterine activity (Figs. 2, 3, and 4). In 5 cases the intensity rose and in 13 it fell. In 11 cases the frequency increased and in 7 it decreased. Uterine activity, the product of intensity and frequency, increased in 7 cases and in 11 there was a decrease. There was no significant difference between the primiparas and the multiparas. The degree of change in each parameter of contractility was analyzed and expressed as per cent of change from the pre-epidural values (Fig. 5). Intensity varied from an increase of 31 per cent to a decrease of 57 per cent. The average value was a decrease of 13.5 per cent. Frequency varied from an increase of 83 per cent to a decrease of 16 per cent with an average value of 9 per cent increase. Uterine activity varied between a 64 per cent increase and a 41 per cent decrease. The average value was a decrease of 4.3 per cent. There was no relationship between the degree of change in any parameter and the cervical dilatation at the initiation of the epidural anesthesia. An analysis of the relationship between the

IO FREQUENCY

anesthesia

UTERINE ACTIVITY

contrllmin.

t WRINi

Primpnra _----

- - -

CASES SHOWING

MMipam

INCREASE

CASES

SHOWING DECREASE

Fig., 3. Frequency

of 15 contractions

pared

contractions

with

anesthesia.

15

during

before comepidurai

Fig. 4. Uterine activity of 15 contractions before compared with 15 contractions during epidural anesthesia.

354

Henry,

Kingston,

and

February 1, 1967 Am. J. Obst. & Gynec.

Maughan

changes in the various parameters shows that the small over-all decrease in uterine activity is primarily the result of the depression of the intensity (Fig. 6). Effect of epidural anesthesia beyond the first fifteen contractions. The analysis of

uterine activity was carried out where possible to include the thirty contractions following the onset of the epidural anesthesia (Fig. 7). There was an average decrease of 32 Montevideo units, or 20 per cent in the primiparas, an average increase of 6 Monte-

60

60

60

INTENSITY

40

(%)

20 0 -20 -40

FREPUENCY

UTERINE ACTIVITY

40

.

l ’

20

.:;t

.

l e

‘g:‘.

l * .

0



-20

l .

-40

I 4 6 . INDIVIDUAL CASES 0 AVERAGE VALUES

6

4

IO

FIGURE 5:

Fig. with

5. Per cent 15 contractions

change in preceding

-60

CERVICAL

values for it. (Cervical

6

6

-60 4

IO

between

6

IO

15 contractions after epidural anesthesia dilatation is expressed in centimeters.)

-40

variation

6

DILATATION

-20

0 VARIATION

Fig. 6. Relationship anesthesia.

60

.

in

intensity

and

20 IN INTENSITY

uterine

40

compared

.

W

activity

caused

by

epidural

Volume

97

Number

3

Epidural

in oxytocin-induced

I --I

PRIMIPARAS

250

I50 i

20

15

IO

5

5

BEFORE

and during

IO

15 WRING

CONTRACTIONS

Fig. 7. Uterine activity before

labor

355

Cervical dilatation and uterine work. Cervical dilatation was then plotted against “uterine work.” This is the effort exhibited by the uterus during a given interval and is measured in millimeters of mercury by adding the intensities of all the contractions during that period.‘O When uterine work is plotted against dilatation, the slope of the line serves as an index of the efficiency of the uterus. Time-dilatation curves can only record the result without taking into account the contractility required to produce it. In Figs. 10 and 11, the cervical dilatation-uterine work curves of these groups are displayed. For the primiparous group the curves show greater efficiency in 6 cases, no change in one, and a period of reduced efficiency in the one who exhibited stationary dilatation. The remaining patient had epidural anesthesia in the second stage. In the multiparous group, 6 cases showed greater efficiency, one showed a period of decreased efficiency although progress was maintained, and 2 showed a period of more markedly decreased efficiency.

video units, or 4 per cent, in the multiparas. The over-all change for the series was a fall of 13 Montevideo units or 8.5 per cent. Progress of labor. Each case was then examined for the effect epidural anesthesia might have on the progress of labor. Cervical dilatation and time. Cervical dilatation was plotted against time to delivery. In Figs. 8 and 9, the “curves” have been separated along the ordinate of dilatation to exhibit each one individually. The time scale on the abscissa is maintained. In the primiparous group, 6 patients exhibited an accleration of dilatation during epidural anesthesia. In one the rate of dilata.tion remained steady. In one there was a period of one hour and 7 minutes of stationary dilatation; the ninth received her epidural anesthesia in the second stage. In the multiparous group the rate of dilatation accelerated in 5 cases; in one there was a slight decrease, but progress was maintained. In one there was a period of 40 minutes of stationary dilatation following the and in 2 cases the epiepidural anesthesia, dural anesthesia was given too close to full dilatation to assess the effect on progress. 350

anesthesia

epidural

anesthesia.

20

25

30

356

Henry,

Kingston,

and

I 6

b I

Maughan

February 1,1967 Am. J. Obst. & Gynec.

I 5

I 4 Noms

I 3

I 2

, I

t 0

T O CEWERV

Fig. 8.

TIME-DILATATION

h

I

CURVES FOR MULTIWRAS

41

3I IaJRS

Fig. 9.

To

#LIVERY

2.

I I

8

Volulne 97 Number 3

Epidural

UTERINE

WORK -DlLAlAlIoW

anesthesia

in oxytocin-induced

labor

357

CURVES FOR PRIMIPARAS

CERYICAL D)LAIATIoW

UTERINE

WRK

T O DELIVERY

Fig. 10. UTERINE

WORK--MLATATION

CURVES

FOR MULTIPARAS

CERWCU DILATA7lDK

c mmNg 6ow

I xl00

I 6nDD

UTERINE

Fig. 11.

I do

I sew rrmK

T O DELIVERY

I x00

I

2ooo

I m

t 0

358

Henry, Kingston,

and Maughan

Postepidural hypotension. The one patient who exhibited postepidural hypotension showed a decrease of 25.5 per cent in the intensity of her contractions, an increase of 19 per cent in their frequency, and a resultant fall of 5.8 per cent in uterine activity. Her labor exhibited a slight decreasein the rate of dilatation after the epidural anesthesia and the efficiency fell slightly as well. Comment

In this small seriesof induced labors there were minimal to marked individual variations in the parameters of contractility mentioned. There was not, however, a trend in either the primiparas or the multiparas suggesting a significant change in contractility with epidural anesthesia. The progress of labor, whether measured against time or against uterine work, did not appear to be materially affected by the epidural anesthesia. If any generalization may be drawn it should be to say that the labors tended to exhibit a slight acceleration of progressand greater efficiency. These are the conclusions to be drawn from the measurementsmade. On theoretical grounds how should we expect epidural anesthesia to affect induced labor? There is evidence that uterine contractility may be influenced in a number of ways: 1. Ferguson reflex. Although there has been no convincing proof to date of the existence in women of the reflex which Fergusonll observed in rabbits, it is probable that it plays a part in the augmentation of uterine activity which accompaniesdilatation in spontaneous labor. Certainly the total uterine activity observed as induced labor progressesis commonly greater than that expected of the infused oxytocin alone. The epidural anesthesiasin our casesdid not descendbelow L, or L, until the perineal dose was given during the second stage. It is unlikely then that an active Ferguson reflex, if present, would have been interfered with. 2. Effect of epinephrine and norepinephrine. The work of Garrett’2 and of Alvarez

February 1, 1967 Am. J. Obst. & Gym.

and Caldeyro-BarciaZ3 indicates that infusions of pure epinephrine are capable of depressing uterine contractility while norepinephrine increases the frequency of contractions and introduces incoordination. Infusions of extracts of the adrenal medulla which contain 80 per cent epinephrine and 20 per cent norepinephrine reduce the intensity and increase the frequency and tonus of contractions, and they become incoordinated. Caldeyro-Barcia6 suggests that “pain, anxiety and other conditions which increase the secretion of the adrenal medulla may disturb uterine contractility in a similar manner.” Since our patients did not experience even the average amount of pain, fear, anxiety, etc., as a result of the constant presence of attendants, the analgesic infusion, and the epidural anesthesia, it is unlikely that this factor was present in any significant sense. It is our belief, however, that in patients who are experiencing fear and pain in labor, the introduction of epidural anesthesiamay be responsible for an observed improvement in the progress of labor for the reasons mentioned above. 3. Position of the mother. Caldeyro-Barcia and ’ co-worker? have described a reciprocal change in the intensity and frequency of contractions which occurs when some patients change from dorsal to lateral position. We have noted these changes in some of our monitored labors and maintained the patient’s position as much as possiblein this seriesto eliminate this source of error in our observations. 4. Oxytocin. The amount of contractility induced by a constant rate infusion of oxytotin increasesfor a period of time and then remains stabIe as long as that rate of infusion is maintained14. This principle was observed in the series; no observations were begun until the period of stable induced contractility was reached. On these grounds it might have been reasonable to predict that epidural anesthesia would not produce any marked changes in the contractility or the progress of these labors.

Volume Number

97 3

Epidural

anesthesia

in oxytocin-induced

labor

359

REFERENCES

1. Heinrichs, W. L., Kornmesser, J. G., and Tulloch, J. A.: Harper Hosp. Bull. 20: 6, 1962. 2. Nielsen, J. S., Spoerel, W. E., Keenleyside, H. B., Slater, P. E., and Clancy, P. R.: Canad. Anesth. Sot. J. 9: 143, 1962. 3. Cowles, G. T.: Obst. & Gynec. 26: 734, 1965. 4. Vasicka, A., and AM. J. Kretchmer, H.: OBST. & GYNEC. 82: 600, 1961. 5. Vasicka, A., Hutchison, H. T., Eng, M., and Allen, C. R.: AM. J. OBST. & GYNEC. 90: 800, 1964. 6. Caldeyro-Barcia, R.: Proc. Second Internat. Congr. Gynec. & Obst. vol. 1: 65, 1958. 7. Caldeyro-Barcia, R., Poseiro, J. J., Alvarez, H., and Test, P.: AM. J. OBST. & GYNEC. 75: 1088, 1958. 8. Henry, J. S., Jr., Hierz, O., Maughan, G. B., and Melanson, G. A.: Proc. Symposium on the Effect of Labor on the Fetus and

9.

10.

11. 12. 13. 14.

Newborn, Montevideo, Uruguay, October, 1964. In press. Caldeyro-Barcia, R., Noriega-Guerra, L., Cibils, L. A., Alvarez, H., Poseiro, J. J., Pose, S. V., Sica-Blanco, Y., Menda-Bauer, C., and Gonzalez-Pan&a, V. H.: Anr. J. OBST. & GYNEC. 80: 284, 1960. Alvarez, H., Cibils, L. A., and GonzalesPan&a, V. H.: In Caldeyro-Barcia, R., and Heller, H., editors: Oxytocin, New York, 1961, Pergamon Press, Inc., p. 203. Surg., Gynec. & Obst. Ferguson, J. K. W.: 73: 379, 1941. Garrett, W.: J. Obst. & Gynaec Brit. Emp. 61: 586, 1954. Alvarez, H., and Caldeyro-Barcia, R.: Maternidade e Infancia 13: 11, 1954. Sica-Blanco, Y., and Sala, N. L.: In Caldeyro-Barcia, R., and Heller, H., editors: Oxytocin, New York, 1961, Pergamon Press, Inc., p. 127.