Vol. 73, No. 4, 1976
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
THE EFFECTS OF LIGANDS ON ENZYMIC CARBOXYL-METHYLATION Emanuel
J. Diliberto,
, Julius
Axelrod
and Irwin
M. Chaiken
Laboratory of Clinical Science National Institute of Mental Health and Laboratory of Chemical Biology Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland 20014
National
Received
*
Jr.
OF NEUROPHYSINS
October
Diseases
19,1976
Summary: The methyl-acceptor activities of bovine neurophysins I and II for the enzyme protein carboxymethylase (EC 2.1.1.24) were found to be similar and as high as for other previously identified, biologically active protein substrates. Effects on the rate of methylation of these neurophysins were investigated with the posterior pituitary hormone ligands, oxytocin and vasopressin, and the hormone-related tripeptide ligand, methionyl-tyrosylphenylalaninamide. An increase in the rate of neurophysin II methylation was observed with both oxytocin and tripeptide. This ligand-induced response did not occur with either native neurophysin I or disulfide-scrambled neurophysin :1. INTRODUCTION Protein
carboxymethylase
0-methyltransferase, the methyl formation bovine
group
EC 2.1.1.24;
methyl
gland
of the enzyme showed acceptors
while
not
as substrates
serve
active
proteins
esters
that
all
the posterior
showed
(3). that
protein
pituitary
the posterior
of neurophysin
carboxymethylase
temporal
chains
guinea
1063
pig
effective
methyl
and vasopressin,
for
did
biologically proteins,
protein
has been of endogenous hypothalamus.
National
from specificity
hormone-binding
substrates
of
in the
purified
were
of other
relationship
Present address: Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Mental Health, Bethesda, Md. 20014. G 1976 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in any form reserved.
oxytocin
and the synthesis
in cultured
transfer
of the substrate
pituitary
effective
*
Copyright All rights
side
hormones
investigation
a close
for
A study
However,
Further,
catalyzes
The enzyme has been
hormones,
methylase
the synthesis
(l-4).
pituitary
as highly
II)
to carboxyl
anterior
do serve
between
methylase
and characterized.
the neurophysins, (5,6).
protein
of S-adenosyl-L-methionine
of protein pituitary
(S-adenosyl-L-methionine:protein-carboxyl
Institute
carboxy-
found
(7)
substrate This of
Vol. 73, No. 4, 1976
relationship
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
is perhaps an expression of -in vivo methylation
of neurophysin
by this enzyme. Inasmuch as neurophysins are active and neurophysin hormone-binding activity
substrates for protein carboxymethylase appears to involve
an ionic inter-
action between a side-chain carboxyl group of neurophysin and the a-amino group of hormone or other peptide ligand (8), a role for methylation neurophysin function
must be considered.
by tht? high specific
activity
One aspect requiring
clarification
methylation
[lysine-vasopressinl-Sepharose
is suggested further
of the enzyme in the posterior
and hormone binding.
of neurophysin did not affect
This possibility
is the direct Previously
qualitatively
in
relationship,
pituitary
(4).
if any, between
(6), it was shown that methylation the binding of the protein
by all-or-none
affinity
to
chromatographic elution.
In the present study, the reverse question was raised, namely, does ligand binding affect related
methylation.
tripeptide
We find that binding of oxytocin
increase carboxyl-methylation
and a hormone-
of neurophysin II.
MATERIALSANDMETHODS Enzyme Purification and Assay-- Protein carboxymethylase was purified from bovine pituitaries by the procedure previously described (3,4). Protein carboxymethylase activity assays (4) were carried out at pH 6.0. In most experiments, neurophysins were preinsubated with ligand at 20" for 10 min prior to addition of S-adenosyl-L-[methylHlmethionine and purified protein carboxymethylase (more than 2000-fold purified); this enzyme incubation was carried out at 37' for 15 min (the period of linear activity). Specific enzqic activity is expressed as units per mg of protein, where a unit equals 1 pmol [ HImethyl transferred per 15 min. Neurophysins-- Bovine neurophysins I and II were isolated from acetonedried posterior pituitaries (Pel-Freeze, Rogers, Arkansas) by the procedure of Hollenberg and Hope (9) with final purification using DEAE-SephadexA-50 (10). Disulfide-scrambled neurophysin II was prepared by incubation of 0.6 mg of neurophysin II in 1 ml of 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate, pH 7.2, containing 1.0 mM 2-mercaptoethanol for 45 h at room temperature. The denatured product was used after exhaustive lyophilization. Synthetic oxytocin (generously Neurophysin Ligands and Other Materialsdesalted provided by Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, as "Syntocinon") was lyophilized, by passing through a Sephadex G-15 column equilibrated with 50% acetic acid, and lyophilized repeatedly from water before use. Native arginine-vasopressin was isolated as a byproduct of the neurophysin isolation and purified further on sulfoethyl-Sephadex C-25 with an elution procedure similar to that described previously (11). Methionyl-tyrosyl-phenylalaninamide, a tripeptide, was prepared by the solid phas3 synthesis method (12). S-adenosyl-L-[methylHlmethionine, 8.54 Ci/mmole, was purchased from New England Nuclear Corp. Luteinizing hormone (ovine) was a generous gift of Dr. Leo Reichert, Emory University.
1064
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 73, No. 4,1976
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Table
1
Comparison of the effects of oxytocin and methionyl-tyrosylphenylalaninamide on the carboxyl-methylation of neurophysins. Protein
PM Activity Ratio with/without added ligand
PCM Activityb (with no additions) (units)
Substrate
a
Oxytocin (0.6 mM) Neurophysin II 10 pM 20 UM
l.62d 3.41d
1.68 1.14
1.74 1.14
Neurophysin 11 (Scrambled) 10 IJM 20 nM
0.53e 1.33e
-------
1.08 0.85
Neurophysin I 10 I-IM 20 UM
2.24 4.04
0.75 0.86
0.83 0.99
Luteining hormone 10 nM
2.29
1.07
----
aUnless otherwise of results from b
Protein Materials
indicated, data are from one experiment at least two other experiments.
carboxymethylase and Methods.
(PCM) activity
was assayed
and are
as described
typical in
%ethionyl-tyrosyl-phenylalaninamide. d
Average
of three
eThese data neurophysin respectively.
experiments.
were obtained II activities
in an experiment where the control native were 1.28 and 2.58 units for 10 uM and 20 !JM,
RESULTS Effect pituitary
of ligand hormones,
carboxymethylase of bovine The relative trations
binding oxytocin
(3).
neurophysin increase of neurophysin
on methylation and vasopressin,
However, II
as shown
was found
in methylation II,
of neurophysins--
reflecting
are not
in Table
1065
rate
for
greater
a decrease
protein
of methylation
by the presence
was consistently at least
substrates
1, the
to be increased
The posterior
of oxytocin
at lower in Km.
concen-
Such a
Vol. 73, No. 4, 1976
response
BIOCHEMICAL
was not observed
hormone
(LH).
An indication
in the observation nificantly for
that
the rate
neurophysin
reduced
in
with
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
non-oxytocin of the specificity
the rate
the presence
of neurophysin
of methylation
of oxytocin
examined
for
its
an increase that
in a manner effect
found
with
assay
were
studies
Comparison
by this
were
response--
which
caused
an increase
II
or slightly
to bind
II
specifically
(13), (Table
to an extent
peptide
was 1).
Again,
similar
effect
(data
with
based
to
activity
on the errors
rate the
II
on substrate II
in
of the
decrease
activity
was shown previously
Denaturation
(13).
a marked
of neurophysin
in substrate
II
activity
of methionyl-tyrosyl-phenylalaninamide of methylation
scrambled
in altering not
in methylating
neurophysin
ligands
caused
in the
changes
neurophysin
a concentration
was ineffective
neurophysin
Also,
as insignificant.
and denatured
procedure
had no significant oxytocin
sig-
shown).
and vasopressin
to interpret
Disulfide-scrambled
Furthermore,
1).
shown
of neurophysin
effects,
regarded
in binding
reduction
(Table
not
changed
was obtained,
difficult
of native
to be inactive
to oxytocin
of ligand
considered
and therefore
and ligand
was obtained
oxytocin.
In the above 15% or less
effect in altering
(data
previously
of methylation
luteinizing
1).
on the methylation
in the rate
II
was little
(Table
similar
i.e.,
was ineffective
Methionyl-tyrosyl-phenylalaninamide, to neurophysins
proteins,
of the ligand
arginine-vasopressin
of methylation
I,
binding
of native
neurophysin
the rate
neurophysin
(Table
of methylation
1).
II
Similarly,
of scrambled
shown).
DISCUSSION The side-chain hormone
binding
methylase. physins, sites.
carboxyl (8)
is a potential
However, hormone This
view
group
since
binding is
of neurophysin site
the hormone
for
methylation
does not
and carboxyl-methylation
consistent
with
a previous
1066
purported
by protein
inhibit
methylation
probably report
to be involved
occur
in which
in
carboxyof neuroat different methylation
of
Vol. 73, No. 4, 1976
neurophysin
BIOCHEMICAL
did
not
appear
vasopressinl-Sepharose The data ligands
not
i.e.,
they
the present
study
inhibit
II
only,
physin,
allowing
for
Aspects
of conformation aggregation
The high
(13)
substrate
effect
protein
carboxymethylase
neurophysin
[lysine-
a greater could
activity
the idea
in fact
certain
neurophysin
have an opposite Furthermore,
effect, a degree
of a significant
and methionyl-tyrosyl-phenylalaninamide I.
This
phenomenon
in some conformational affinity
by ligand
a particular
feature
of neurophysins
(5),
and the high
in the posterior of a biological
pituitary role
aspect
of neurophysin
be affected
on carboxyl-methylation
with
to
by the observation
on neurophysin
or perhaps
that
of reaction.
indicated
oxytocin
change
which
but
the rate
is
and not
at least
hormone
consistent
in
with
of a hormone-induced
simply
of the protein
indicate
methylation
response
of methylation
on neurophysin
the binding
an increase
in this
stimulation
result
in
do not
produce
of specificity
to alter
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
(6).
obtained only
AND BIOPHYSICAL
for
may be the of the neuro-
for
binding
the enzyme. might
in monomeric the specificity
specific
activity
and hypothalamus methylation
include
folding. of the of (4)
are
in hormone-
function.
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. a. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
Kim, S. and Paik, W.K. (1971) Biochemistry, 10, 3141-3145. Morin, A.M. and Liss, M. (1973) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 52, 373-378. Diliberto, E.J., Jr. and Axelrod, J. (1974) Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 1701-1704. Diliberto, E.J., Jr. and Axelrod, J. (1976) J. Neurochem., 26, 1159-1165. Axelrod, J. and Diliberto, E.J., Jr. (1975) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 248, 90-91. Edgar, D.H. and Hope, D.B. (1974) FEBS Letters, 49, 145-148. Kim, S., Pearson, D. and Paik, W.P. (1975) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 67, 448-454. Walter, R. and Hoffman, P.L. (1973) Fed. Proc., 32, 5674. Hollenberg, M.D. and Hope, D.B. (1968) Biochem. J., 106, 557-564. Breslow, E., Aanning, H.L., Abrash, L. and Schmir, M. (1971) ,J. Biol. Chem., 246, 5179-5188. Acher, R., Light, A. and duvigneaud, V. (1958) J. Biol. Chem., 233, 116-120. Merrifield, R.B. (1963) J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 85, 2149-2154. Chaiken, I.M., Randolph, R.E. and Taylor, H.C. (1975) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 248, 442-450.
1067