THE
ELECTRONIC AS
STRUCTURE
THE
OF
INHIBITORS
OF
CARBAMATE
DERIVATIVES
CHOLINESTERASE
TAKASHI BAN Departmentof Pharmacology,Facultyof Medicine,Kyoto University,Sakyo-ku,Kyoto CHIKAYOSHI
NAGATA
NationalCancerResearchInstitute,Chuo-ku,Tokyo Received for publication July 30, 1965 The inhibition of many
of cholinesterase
researchers
in relation
by some of carbamates
to the clinical
(2, 3) of the compounds. In this paper the author's chief concern tionship
between
cholinesterase
the electronic
inhibitors
and
structure
usefulness
is mainly
has attracted (1) and
devoted to investigating
of several structurally
the inhibitory
potency
the attention
insecticidal
the rela
related carbamate
of these compounds
(acetyl) cholinesterase, on the basis of the experiments et al. (4) and Wilson et al. (5) and to trying to analyse
activity
against
type true
of Kolbezen et al. (2), Myers the inhibitory mechanism of
them by this means. METHODS As the bamate and
the
the total
of a series
of car
7r electron
density
superdelocalizability were
treated
methyl
carbamate
in the
phenyl
moyl
choline
by
LCAO here
and
of the its
the MO
are
series with
part
phenyl
N-methyl
and
carba
and
N,N
adopted
are listed
with the reports
of Fukui et al.
(7, 8). Sometimes finer differences of reactivity among some analogous compounds can be detect
隆 志 ・永 田
as also shown in this report.
親義
employed
N
as those of Fukui et al. (6). Concerning the meaning of the superdelocalizability the readers
伴
parameters
calculation.
some substituents
molecule
parameters
ed by this index
the
method.
the
in Table 1. These values are the similar values
might consult
Energy
in
variational
derivatives.
The energy
1.
for a nucleophilic
calculated
of the simple
Molecules
dimethyl
indices
compounds,
reactivity method
reactivity
TABLE
* The coulomb integral
of the atom
X is written as ax=a+axJS, where a and f are the coulomb integral and the resonance integral in benzene respec tively. t The resonance integral between the atom X and Y is written as (3x_Y=l(3. + In the carbamoyl choline series, the latter value was adopted. In this case only the coulomb integral of the carbon atom adjacent to the substituent is assumed to be changed and estimated as aci=a+0.5J3.
FiG. 1. Relationship between logarithm of median ChE (fly brain) inhibitory molar concentration (pI50) of substituted phenyl N-methyl carbamates and the total 7r electron density of the ethereal oxygen atom (I., q_o_), that of carbonyl oxygen atom (II., qo=), that of the carbonyl carbon atom (III., q,, 0-), the superdelocalizability for a nucleophilic reactivity of that atom (III., Sr(N), 0------) and logarithm of alkali hydrolytic constant (IV.) of these compounds. This last value (IV.) is taken from Ref. (3). The scale of q, is taken in inverse order, because the nucleophilic reactivity would be increased as the atom loses its 7r electron share and gets posi tive. The results of calculation of the approximate superdelocalizability for a nucleophilic reactivity of the carbonyl carbon atom were published previously (28). In this and subsequent figures, each line indicates a regression line.
As for the carbamoyl choline derivatives, the alkyl group was excluded from the calculations because it might not be conjugated with the it electron system of the car bamate ester group. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION We calculated philic reactivity and found that
the total it electron
density
and the superdelocalizability
for a nucleo
on various positions of several substituted phenyl N-metyl carbamates the total it electron density of the ethereal oxygen atoms and, though
in the lesser degree, that with the house-fly
brain
of the carbonyl cholinesterase
oxygen
atoms had
inhibitory
potency
(2) (Fig. 1-I and II) and with that of the rat brain by Myers et al. (4) (Fig. 2), while the positive charge or the superdelocalizability
almost linear
observed
correlation
by Kolbezen et al.
true (acetyl) cholinesterase
observed
for a nucleo
philic reactivity of the carbonyl carbon atoms was inversely related to them (Fig. 1-111 and 2) and roughly parallel with the hydrolytic ability in the alkaline solution measured by Kolbezen et al. (2) (Fig. 1-III and IV). The similar tendency shown in Figs . 1-I, III and 2 suggests that the enzyme of Kolbezen et al. and
that
of Myers
et al. are the same
kind. On the other hand, we also calculated
the
positive charge and the superdelocalizability for a nucleophilic reactivity of the carbonyl carbon atoms
of the
methyl and
carbamoyl
N,N-dimethyl
total n electron
density
choline
and
derivatives
its N and the
of the ethereal oxygen
FIG. 2. Relationship between logarithm of median ChE (rat brain) inhibitory molar concentration (pI50) of substitut ed phenyl N-methyl carbamates and the total it electron density of the ethereal oxygen atom (q_0 0-) and the superdelocalizability for a nucleophilic reactivity of the carbonyl carbon atom (Sr(N), •------) of them.
atoms of them. Seen in Fig. 3 is the parallel
relationship
between
those indices
of the carbonyl
carbon atoms and the rate constant (k,,: referred to later) of the formation of the irre versible enzyme inhibitor complex measured by Wilson et al . (5) and the inverse rela tionship between the total rr electron density of the ethereal oxygen atoms and the rate constrant The
k3'. parallel
the ethereal
relationships
or carbonyl
inverse relationships
between
the reactivities
for an electrophilic
oxygen atom and the cholinesterase
between
those for a nucleophilic
atom and the latter in the phenyl
carbamate
reaction
inhibitory
reaction
potency
of the carbonyl
of
or the carbon
series were also noticed by Kolbezen et al ., more
Metcalf, and Myers et al. in the papers cited above (2-4) though they were estimated quantitatively. By plotting
the I50 value to the reactivity
of the ethereal
or carbonyl
oxygen atom
FiG. 3. Relationship between logarithm of the rate constant k3 of carbamoyl choline derivatives and the total it electron density of the carbonyl carbon atom (q, , the superdelocalizability for a nucleophilic reactivity of that atom (Sr(N), •------) and the total r electron density of the ethereal oxygen atom (q-o-, 0-) of these compounds.
estimated
by Hammett's
sigma
values, the formers
(2, 3) suggested
that
as an initial
process either oxygen atom might react with the positive site of the enzyme receiving the attack of water, hydrolytic cleavage of C-O bond would occur. planation reversible
and then This ex
seems to be consistent with the finding that some of the carbamates are not competitive inhibitors but are competitive substrates of which the destruction
rate is very slow (9-13). There have been some indications such as prostigmine and furthermore,
requires
at its esteratic
which the dialkyl phosphates The above led Myers
but simple potency
involved
site of the enzyme
might form the carbamoyl
(14),
derivatives
similar
of
to that in
the enzyme.
et al. (4) to the supposition
inhibitory
reaction
in the esteratic
site (5, 11, 12, 15-18) in a manner
phosphorylate
not be substrates
the cholinesterase the inhibitory
the basic group
that some of the carbamates
the cholinesterase
mates might
that the binding of some of the phenyl carbamates
that these phenyl
competitive
N-methyl
carba
because the order
of
is the reverse of that which might be expected
if
a transesterification
inhibitors,
of the N-methyl
carbamoyl
group
from the phenol to the active center and is also the reverse of that observed with ana logous organophosphorus compounds. Though
the final answer
would be given by a more direct attack on this problem,
more recent works of Wilson et al. (5, 18) seem to us to give a more reasonable tion for our consideration The general reaction moyl enzyme According
proposed
of the electronic
structure
scheme for the cholinesterase by Wilson, Harrison
of the carbamates. inhibitor
and Ginsburg
to this scheme and their equation
interpreta
which
produces a carba
(5) is shown below.
(18), I5, value at the attainment
of the
steady states isapproximately equal to KkIk4-(K, = ki)assuming k2» k,,K,» I5,and
that
the E' complex
mainly
contributes
to the
inhibition. Therefore,
it is expected
that
the
rate constant
k3 is and the
smaller
tion
K,
rate
the
constant more
potent
and
the
will
be the
larger
the
the dissocia
constant
k, are , of the
inhibition
cholinesterase. The
magnitude
on the
nucleophilic
carbon
atom
ratic
of K,
may
with
the
basic
site of the enzyme.
tionship
shown
largely
of the group
Here
in Figs.
by the interpretation the inhibitory
depend
reactivity
carbonyl
in the este
the inverse
1-111 and 2, is explained
that the contribution
potency of the compounds
are not very strong The magnitude the comparative
rela
of the initial process may be negligible
probably
corresponding
for
to the finding that they
inhibitors. of k3 depends on the lability of C-O (C-X) bond.
values of this bond lability
by the magnitude
We could estimate
of the positive charges of
the ethereal oxygen atoms, because it is stated that as the electron deficiency of the atoms of susceptible
link is increased,
and the reaction
the activation
energy of bond cleavage will be decreased
rate (k3) will be increased
(16, 19, 20). is the reverse of the results in Figs . 1-I and 2. These seeming contradictory results are explainable when one considers This expectation
may exist an acidic group in certain
near the basic group of the esteratic
substrates might participate
the protonation
of the ethereal
with the hydrolytic
that there
site (16, 21-24) which
cleavage of this bond through
oxygen atom.
When this is the case, the smaller the positive charge of the ethereal oxygen atom is, the more easily the bond cleavage will be promoted through the formation of the stronger
hydrogen
bond
(16, 19).
From the above discussions, true (acetyl) cholinesterase electronic
structure
we might suspect that these relationships
inhibitory
indicate
that
potency of phenyl
N-methyl
between
carbamates
the
and their
they
are substrates , but, that their rate determining process is not the initial process (designated as k, and k2) but the second process (desig nated as k3). It must be stressed that the rate determining necessarily N-methyl
lie in the second process. and N,N-dimethyl
by the relation Whether
between
derivatives
Some of them such as carbamoyl may have it in the initial
may not
choline and its
process as suggested
their reactivity
the rate determining
to be dependent
process of all the carbamates
on the magnitude
indices and rate constant k3'. process is the initial process or the second process seems of the rate of the initial process , because it is known by the introduction of quarternary
that when the rate of the initial process is promoted ammonium
ion (to the substrate)
which interacts
with the anionic
site of the enzyme ,
the second step is also promoted
(25, 26) though
in the case of prostigmine
the acidic
group in the esteratic site rather seems to be deprived of its binding ability (14). This would be the case of carbamoyl choline inhibitors. But when the rate of this process is not accelerated as much, the second process which is not affected by the initial process and is by nature
a slower process, would become the rate determining
would be the case of phenyl
N-methyl
carbamates
process, and this
except for its quartenary
ammonium
salts. Recent
work of Metzger
of cholinesterase
by diphenyl
and Wilson (27) which carbamoyl
also suggests that the rate determining nary
investigated
process of these inhibitors
which have no quarter
salts seems to be in the second process.
The inhibitory
potency of some other carbamates
molecule
N-methyl
or alkyl
the verification
without
such as m-trimethyl
with some substituents quarternary
ammonium
on the other part of the
ammonium
ion may be useful
for
of this supposition.
Our consideration propriety matically
carbamates
carbamates
reaction
chloride and their fluoride
ammonium
salts of phenyl
the inhibitory
and methyl carbamoyl
of the electronic
structure
is interesting
as it is suggestive
of the
of the assumption of Wilson et al. that some carbamates are destroyed enzy through two intermediate stages and also it is suggestive of the functional
dependency
between
the esteratic
site and the anionic
site.
SUMMARY The total rr electron vity of several phenyl tives are calculated cholinesterase
density and the superdelocalizability N-methyl
inhibitory
The relationships
derivatives
and
carbamoyl
in relation
choline
reacti deriva
to their true (acetyl)
potency. found are as follows :
1. In the phenyl N-methyl 7r electron
carbamate
by the simple LCAO MO method
for a nucleophilic
carbamate
density of the ethereal
series the order of the magnitude
oxygen atom and the carbonyl
of the total
oxygen atom is almost
parallel to that of the inhibitory potency of the enzyme, while the order of the magni tude of the positive charge or the superdelocalizability for a nucleophilic reactivity of the carbonyl
carbon
atom is the reverse to that.
2. In the carbamoyl
choline series, the order of the magnitude
and the superdelocalizability is parallel complex,
for a nucleophilic
to the rate constant while that
reactivity
of the formation
of the magnitude
of the positive charge
of the carbonyl
of the irreversible
of the total rr electron
density
carbon
enzyme
atom
inhibitor
of the ethereal
oxygen atom is the reverse of that. From these results, and the possibility enzyme, it is suggested action
between
that in the latter
the carbonyl
carbon
esteratic
site of the enzyme supported
ion and
the anionic
atom
that these carbamates
might carbamylate
series the rate determining of carbamates
by the one between
site (the initial process), while
and
the
process is the re
the basic group
the quarternary
in the
ammonium
in the former series , it is the C-O
bond cleavage process through the hydrogen bond formation between the ethereal oxygen atom of the compounds and the acidic group in the esteratic site of the enzyme (the second process). It is stressed contribute
that
to clarifying
exploration
of the electronic
the inhibitory
mechanism
structure
of the compounds
may
of the enzyme.
Acknowledgement : The authors wish to acknowledge that a part of the calculation were carried out on the computers in Department of Public Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University and National Cancer Research Institute, Tokyo. We also wish to express our thanks to Dr. Lowy and Mr. Robert Ratcheson, of the Center for Brain Research, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y. for reading the manuscript and for their kind advices. REFERENCES 1) STEMPEL, A. ANDAESCHLIMANN, J.A. : MedicinalChemistry,Edited by BLICKE, F.F. ANDCox, R.H., vol. III, p. 238, John Wiley, New York (1956) 2) KOLBEZEN, M., METCALF, R.L. ANDFUKUTO,T.: J. Agr. Food Chem.2, 864 (1954) 3) METCALF,R.L. : OrganicInsecticides, p. 317, Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York (1955) 4) MYERS,D.K., KEMP,A. JR., TOL,J.W. ANDDEJONGE,M.H.T. : Biochem. J. 65, 232 (1957) 5) WILSON,I.B., HARRISON, M.A. ANDGINSBURG, S. : J. Biol. Chem.236, 1498 (1961) 6) FUKUI,K., MOROKUMA, K., NAGATA, C. ANDIMAMURA, A. : Bull. Chem.Soc.Japan 34, 1224 (1961) 7) FUKUI,K., YONEZAWA, T. ANDNAGATA, C.: J. chem.Phys.29, 1247 (1957) 8) FUKUI,K., YONEZAWA, T. ANDNAGATA,C.: Bull. Chem.Soc.Japan 27, 423 (1954) 9) GOLDSTEIN, A. ANDHAMLISCH, R.E. : Arch. Biochem.Biophys.35, 12 (1952) 10) MYERS,D.K.: Biochem. J. 52, 46 (1952) 11) MYERS,D.K.: Ibid. 62, 556 (1956) 12) CASIDA, J.E., AUGUSTINSSON, K.-B. ANDJONSSON,G. : J. econ.Ent. 53, 205 (1960) 13) FELLMAN, J.H. ANDFUJITA,T.S. : Fed. Proc. 23, 384 (1964) 14) WILSON,I.B.: Biochem.biophys.acta 7, 466 (1951) 15) MYERS,D.K. ANDKEMP,A.: Nature,Lond. 173, 33 (1954) 16) BERGMANN, F. : Advancesin Catalysis12, 130 (1958) 17) AUGUSTINSSON, K.-B., FREDRIKSSON, T., SUNDWALL, A. ANDJONSSON,G. : Biochem.Pharmacol.3, 68 (1959) 18) WILSON,LB., HATCH,M.A. ANDGINSBURG, S. : J. biol. Chem.235, 2312 (1960) 19) BERGMANN, F., RIMON,S. ANDSEGAL,R. : Biochem. J. 68, 493 (1958) 20) PULLMAN, A. ANDPULLMAN, B.: Proc.nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.45, 1572 (1959) 21) WILSON,LB. ANDBERGMANN, F. : J. biol. Chem.186, 683 (1950) 22) WILSON,LB.: The Mechanismof Enzyme Action,Edited by MCELROY, W.D. ANDGLASS,B., p. 642, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore (1954) 23) BERGMANN, F., SEGAL,R., SHIMONI,A. ANDWURZEL,M. : Biochcm.J. 63, 684 (1956) 24) BAN,T.: THISJOURNAL13, 225 (1963) 25) WILSON,I.B. : Discussions Faraday Soc.No. 20, 119 (1955) 26) WILSON,I.B. ANDCABIB,E. : J. Amer.Chem.Soc.78, 202 (1956) 27) METZGER, H.P. ANDWILSON,I.B. : Fed. Proc.23, 316 (1964) 28) BAN,T. ANDSHINAGAWA, Y. : SeibutsuButsuri2, 23 (1962)