The evaluation of 7 commercial real-time PCR kits for Zaire ebolavirus using virus-like particle–encapsulated EBOV RNA

The evaluation of 7 commercial real-time PCR kits for Zaire ebolavirus using virus-like particle–encapsulated EBOV RNA

    The evaluation of seven commercial real-time PCR kits for Zaire Ebolavirus using virus-like particles encapsulated EBOV RNA Guojing W...

285KB Sizes 3 Downloads 24 Views

    The evaluation of seven commercial real-time PCR kits for Zaire Ebolavirus using virus-like particles encapsulated EBOV RNA Guojing Wang, Rui Zhang, Le Chang, Dong Zhang, Lei Zhang, Xin Yang, Chao Liu, Jiansheng Ding, Kuo Zhang, Guigao Lin, Xie Jiehong, Jinming Li PII: DOI: Reference:

S0732-8893(15)00289-8 doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.07.025 DMB 13885

To appear in:

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

14 May 2015 8 July 2015 30 July 2015

Please cite this article as: Wang Guojing, Zhang Rui, Chang Le, Zhang Dong, Zhang Lei, Yang Xin, Liu Chao, Ding Jiansheng, Zhang Kuo, Lin Guigao, Jiehong Xie, Li Jinming, The evaluation of seven commercial real-time PCR kits for Zaire Ebolavirus using viruslike particles encapsulated EBOV RNA, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.07.025

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Title page The evaluation of seven commercial real-time PCR kits for Zaire

RI P

T

Ebolavirus using virus-like particles encapsulated EBOV RNA Guojing Wang1, 2, Rui Zhang1, Le Chang1, 2, Dong Zhang1, 2, Lei Zhang1, 3, Xin

SC

Yang1, 2, Chao Liu1, 2, Jiansheng Ding1, 2, Kuo Zhang1, Guigao Lin1, Xie Jiehong1,

1

MA NU

Jinming Li1*

National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital of National Health and

Family Planning Commission, Beijing, People’s Republic of China Graduate School, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical

ED

2

Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of

AC

China

CE

3

PT

Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

*Corresponding author Mailing address: National Center for Clinical Laboratories Beijing Hospital, No.1 Dahua Road, Dongdan, Beijing 100730, P R China. Tel: 86-10-58115053; Fax: 86-10-65212064 E-mail: [email protected] Running title: Evaluation of EBOV real-time RT-PCR kits Word counts of the abstract: 143 words Word counts of the body of the text: 2539 words

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ABSTRACT

RI P

T

Several Chinese commercial real-time PCR kits for Zaire Ebolavirus have been developed after the Ebola outbreak and used by Chinese medical teams in West

SC

Africa. In order to know the essential performance indicators of these kits, analytical sensitivity and precision were evaluated with virus-like particles (VLPs)

MA NU

encapsulated EBOV RNA. The limit of detection and the precision were completed with a series of VLPs. The maximum and minimum of limit of detection was acquired by ZJ BioTech and Daan gene respectively. For precision, all of the

ED

detection results were less than 5% except the maximum 5.17%. Among them

PT

Puruikang, Daan gene, Sansure, ZJ BioTech and Huada demonstrated superior reproducibility. Overall, the requirements of LOD<1000 copies/mL and CV<5%

CE

could be satisfied by all kits except Kehua. Meanwhile, it is feasible for VLPs as a

AC

substitute of positive samples in assays evaluation.

Keywords: Ebola virus, kits evaluation, real time RT-PCR, virus-like particles.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT INTRODUCTION Ebola virus belongs to the Filoviridae family and contains a single negative-sense,

phosphoprotein

(VP35),

matrix

protein

RI P

T

nearly 19kb RNA strand which encodes seven proteins: nucleoprotein (NP), (VP40),

glycoprotein

(GP),

SC

replication-transcription protein (VP30), matrix protein (VP24) and RNA dependent RNA polymerase (L) (Fields BN et al., 2007). Among the five species (Bundibugyo,

MA NU

Sudan, Zaire, Tai Forest and Reston), the Zaire species has the most frequent outbreaks and the highest mortality rate from 57% to 90% (McElroy AK et al., 2014) to human being. In 2014, viral isolation and sequence alignment were conducted and

PT

(Baize S et al., 2014).

ED

identified that the epidemic strain in West Africa was Zaire Ebolavirus (EBOV)

In early August, 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) had announced the

CE

outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa as “public healthy emergency

AC

of international concern”. The number of both infectors and deaths of EVD in recent epidemic was the highest and more than 22 prior outbreaks in total since the firstly identified in 1976 (WHO, 2014). The center for EBOV plague was Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, along with other countries in West Africa, such as Nigeria and Senegal. Europe and the United States had also been reported as sporadic affected regions (Ledgerwood JE et al., 2014). Confronting with the situation above, China authority had provided supports for Africa since September 2014. Sierra Leone - China friendship hospital was built and a mobile biosafety level-3 laboratory (BSL-3), diagnostic reagents for EBOV, public

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT health experts and medical staffers were all transported and dispatched for four times to EBOV-affected areas (Gao GF et al., 2014). In response to the aid of West Africa,

RI P

T

plenty of commercial kits for qualitative detecting Zaire Ebola virus had been independently developed in China.. The ZJ BioTech kit had obtained the fully

SC

approval of WHO in May 2015 and the certification from Conformite Europeenne (CE) since 2010. Five of them were approved by Chinese Food and Drug

MA NU

Administration (CFDA), including Daan gene, ZJ BioTech, Puruikang, Tianlong and HuaDa BioTech, and put into use in West Africa. The kit of Puruikang, which was applied by Chinese medical team, took the principal responsibility for testing Ebola

ED

virus in epidemic area. However, no evaluation for these commercial kits had been

PT

performed yet. In this circumstance, the National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) conducted the assessment of seven Chinese commercial EBOV real time

CE

RT-PCR assays using virus-like particles, concerning the analytical sensitivity and

AC

precision for the qualitative diagnostic reagents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Preparation of EBOV VLPs The full-length sequences of 3’ long terminal repeat (LTR) (1-55bp), NP (56-2340bp), and parts of GP (6291-6500bp and 7761-7850bp), L (13051-13710bp) and 5’ LTR (18271-18630bp) of recently epidemic Zaire strain (GenBank: KJ660346, KJ660347 and KJ660348) were gene synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Inc.(Beijing, China). The selected sequences were split into two parts and each part was individually subcloned into the vector of pACYC-MS2. The recombinant

RI P

T

plasmids of pACYC-MS2-NP and pACYC-MS2-GP/L were transformed into the Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3). Two kinds of MS2 virus-like particles (VLPs)

sequences

along with

5’LTR

were

SC

respectively contained the RNA of NP fragment along with 3’LTR, and GP and L prepared

by inducible expressions

of

MA NU

isopropyl--D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and purification by means of exclusion chromatography according to our previous protocols (Sun Y et al., 2013; Song L et al., 2011).

ED

The prepared VLPs were digested with DNase and RNase in order to eliminate the

PT

influence of nucleic acid out of the capsid of VLPs. Subsequently, the contents were extracted from the VLPs using the kit for viral nucleic acid extraction (QIAGEN

CE

China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and ordinary

AC

PCR were conducted simultaneously to verify the target RNA (not DNA) encapsulated in VLPs, which showed in S1 Fig. (Supplemental metarial). After extracted the RNA in successfully prepared VLPs, the concentration was tested and estimated following the formula: (6.02×1023 copies/mol) × armored RNA mass (g/ml)/molar mass (g/mol) = concentration (copies/ml). Two kinds of VLPs were diluted individually by normal human serum as substitutes of clinical samples. The characteristics of seven commercial kits In all of participated assays in this evaluation, the CFDA had approved the kits from Daan gene, ZJ BioTech, Puruikang in green channel for direct application in

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT West Africa. And the kit of Puruikang was appointed as the specialized detection assay for Chinese medical team. Subsequently, Huada and Tianlong were acquired the

RI P

T

qualification from CFDA. Meanwhile, the manufacturers of Sansure and Kehua developed the EBOV detection kits for alternative productions. The characteristics of

SC

the seven commercial EBOV real-time RT-PCR detection kits are summarized in Table 1. Among all of the manufacturers for Zaire species detection, only Sansure

MA NU

preferred the magnetic-bead based method for RNA extraction and provided related reagents by themselves. Others took the conventional approach of spin column and QIAamp viral RNA mini kit (QIAGEN China Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was

ED

selected in the process for nucleic acid extraction. Meanwhile, Ebola virus types

PT

testing could merely been carried out by the kit of Sansure, while others focused on the specific detection of Zaire species. The manufacturer of Puruikang chose GP

CE

fragment as detection site while others mainly concentrated on NP site, which was

AC

reflected in figure 1.

TABLE 1 Characteristics of seven commercial EBOV real-time RT-PCR kits Commercial kits

Target region

Genotyping

Principle

Dye

IC a (dye)

Quantitative

RNA extracted method

Daan Gene ZJ BioTech

EBOV-NP EBOV- NP, 3’LTR

No No

TaqMan TaqMan

VIC FAM

Yes(CY5) Yes(HEX)

No No

spin column spin column

HuaDa BioTech KeHua

EBOV-NP EBOV-NP

No No

TaqMan TaqMan

FAM FAM

No No

spin column spin column

TianLong

EBOV-NP

No

TaqMan

FAM

No

spin column

Sansure

EBOV-NP

Yes

TaqMan

FAM

Yes(VIC) Yes(HEX or VIC) Yes(HEX or VIC) Yes(HEX)

No

magnetic-bead

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT SUDV-NP TAFV-GP BDBV-NP EBOV-GP

Puruikang

b

TaqMan

FAM

No

T

IC, Internal control.

Yes(HEX)

RI P

a

No

Approval agency: CE, Conformite Europeenne; WHO, World Health Organization; CFDA,

SC

China’s Food and Drug Administration.

commercial assays. Ebola

virus

genome

MA NU

Fig.1 Organization of Ebola virus genome and detected target regions for

is

arranged

3’LTR-NP-VP35-VP40-GP-VP30-VP24-L-5’LTR.

in The

the

follow

detection

assays

order: were

ED

substituted by letters. A: ZJ BioTech; B: Daan Gene; C: HuaDa BioTech; D:

PT

Puruikang; E: TianLong; F: Sansure; G: Kehua. The detection regions for the seven

CE

commercial kits were marked in the sketch map.

AC

Limit of detection

Two kinds of EBOV VLPs were respectively diluted in a 10-fold series and tested preliminary from 107 copies/mL to 10 copies/mL. Applied biosystems 7500 fast real-time PCR system was used for evaluation of seven commercial kits. After the general scope of effective detection was determined, the endpoints for limitation were set. A series of diluted endpoints (500 copies/mL, 250 copies/mL, 100 copies/mL, 50 copies/mL, 25 copies/mL and 5 copies/mL) were used to compare the different concentrations for limit of detection (LOD) studies. Meanwhile, the logarithmic transformation for copies was conducted correspondingly. The experiments for LOD

spin column

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT were performed in five operating days, and every endpoint tested for three replicates in each time. Totally, 15 results for LOD were obtained and each data had only two

RI P

T

outcomes: detected or undetected (Table 2). The data was processed and Probit

SC

analysis was used for regression analysis by SPSS version 19.0.

Aa

Parameter

AC

a

B

C

D

E

F

G

15/15 100 8/15 53.33 5/15 33.33 3/15 20 UN b UN 677 399~1961

15/15 100 15/15 100 14/15 93.33 12/15 80 10/15 66.67 1/15 6.67 99 61~246

15/15 100 15/15 100 12/15 80 9/15 60 1/15 6.67 UN 139 97~318

15/15 100 15/15 100 13/15 86.67 10/15 66.67 2/15 13.33 UN 119 86~255

15/15 100 15/15 100 15/15 100 13/15 86.67 8/15 53.33 1/15 6.67 77 50~176

15/15 100 15/15 100 14/15 93.33 10/15 66.67 3/15 20 UN 104 73~244

ED

15/15 100 15/15 100 15/15 100 15/15 100 13/15 86.67 3/15 20 33 21~85

CE

500 No. of positive/Total 2.70 % Positive 250 No. of positive/Total 2.40 % Positive 100 No. of positive/Total 2.00 % Positive 50 No. of positive/Total 1.70 % Positive 25 No. of positive/Total 1.40 % Positive 5 No. of positive/Total 0.70 % Positive Estimated value of 95% CI c Limits of 95% CI

PT

Copies/ml Log10

MA NU

TABLE 2 Limit of detection of seven commercial EBOV detection assays

The commercial assays participated in evaluation: A: Daan Gene; B: ZJ BioTech; C: HuaDa

BioTech; D: KeHua; E: TianLong; F: Sansure; G: Puruikang. b

UN, undetected.

c

CI, confidential interval.

Precision Combined with the results of LOD, the concentrations for precision detection were

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT confirmed accordingly. The VLP encapsulated GP fragment, with the concentrations of 105 copies/mL, 103 copies/mL and 110 copies/mL, was used for the assessment of

RI P

T

the kit of Puruikang. Meanwhile, the serial concentration of 8×104 copies/mL, 8×102 copies/mL and 120 copies/mL for VLPs contained NP fragment were set to evaluate

SC

the remaining six kits. However, for the kit of ZJ Bio Tech, the lowest detection concentration was not included because of its high value of LOD. EBOV VLPs were

MA NU

diluted in advance and stored in 4℃ during the whole process for precision detection. The repeatability and reproducibility of the seven commercial assays were individually completed by detecting the intra-assay and inter-assay variations for the

ED

crossing threshold (Ct) values. The intra-assay precision was determined from 20

PT

replicates, while the inter-assay precision was calculated from six independent PCR runs with three replicates per run for each kit. Additionally, for the assay from Sansure

CE

Bio-Tech Co. Ltd., the precision was only detected with the Zaire strain of Ebola virus

AC

instead of other three types. The data was analyzed and the means, standard deviations (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated by SPSS version 19.0. The accredited range of CV for intra-assay and inter-assay variations of all evaluated assays was below 5%.

RESULTS Evaluation of EBOV VLPs The MS2 VLPs encapsulated with target EBOV RNA sequences were prepared

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT successfully. Target fragments were correctly amplified by RT-PCR instead of ordinary PCR, which effectively proved the contents encapsulated in VLPs were RNA

RI P

T

but not DNA after nucleotides extracted (S1 Fig.). The concentrations of two kinds of VLPs were both from 8×1010 copies/ml to 8×1011 copies/ml. The VLPs were stable in

SC

4℃ for two mouths which were consistent with the previous results (Song L et al., 2011). Seven commercial EBOV real-time RT-PCR kits were used and the scopes of

Limit of detection analysis

MA NU

dilution for VLPs were preliminarily determined.

Among the seven commercial EBOV real-time RT-PCR kits, the assay from

ED

Puruikang was evaluated by one of the VLPs encapsulated with GP fragment, while

PT

other kits by another VLP with the sequences of 3’LTR and NP. Generally, all of the seven reagents could detect EBOV under 1000 copies/mL and the details were list in

CE

Table 2. The Daan gene EBOV RT-PCR assay indicated the highest sensitivity, with a

AC

95% detection limit of 33 copies/mL (95% confidence interval (CI), 21 to 85 copies/mL), followed by the Sansure kit with 77 copies/mL (95% CI, 50 to 176 copies/mL) and the HuaDa BioTech kit with 99 copies/mL (95% CI, 61 to 246 copies/mL). The LOD of Kehua and Tianlong were 139 copies/mL (95% CI, 97 to 318 copies/mL) and 119 copies/mL (95% CI, 86 to 255 copies/mL) respectively, which were both more than 100 copies/mL. The ZJ BioTech kit possessed the maximum LOD in the seven different kits of 677 copies/mL (95% CI, 399 to 1961 copies/mL). However, the LOD of ZJ BioTech was also satisfied with the condition under 1000 copies/mL. The Puruikang kit could test the EBOV of 104 copies/mL

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (95% CI, 73 to 244 copies/mL) for GP fragment. Precision

RI P

T

In order to analyze the repeatability and reproducibility of the seven kits, intra-assay and inter-assay variations for the Ct values were demonstrated in Table 3.

SC

Referring the high concentration (NP: 8×104 copies/mL and GP: 105 copies/mL) of VLP for precision testing, the kit of Kehua demonstrated the maximum of CV

MA NU

(intra-assay: 2.01% and inter-assay: 3.84%) while the CV of the other kits were all below 2%. The relatively small variations were obtained by the reagent from ZJ Bio Tech (intra-assay CV: 0.30% and inter-assay CV: 0.98%) and Sansure (intra-assay CV:

ED

0.77% and inter-assay CV: 0.85%). The results in middle concentration of precision

PT

evaluation were similar to the high concentration group. In the group of low concentration, the relatively high values of CV were obtained by Kehua and Tianlong,

CE

while other kits were all lower than 3%. The maximum value of CV acquired by

AC

Kehua was 5.17%, which was the only one over 5% in the whole precision detection.

TABLE 3 Precision testing of different EBOV real-time RT-PCR kits

Concentration of VLPs a (Copies/mL)

Parameter b

Daan Gene

ZJ BioTech

HuaDa BioTech

KeHua

TianLong

Sansure

Puruikang

NP: 8×104 GP: 105

Intra-assay

28.350.19

29.950.09

27.470.32

21.420.43

22.130.40

27.200.21

24.010.19

(mean Ct S.D) CV (%)

0.67

0.30

1.16

2.01

1.81

0.77

0.79

Inter-assay

28.340.47

29.550.29

27.160.41

21.860.84

22.180.41

26.970.23

24.200.27

(mean Ct S.D) CV (%)

1.66

0.98

1.51

3.84

1.85

0.85

1.12

Intra-assay

35.170.59

34.280.62

33.540.40

28.830.98

28.880.74

34.050.46

30.960.39

NP: 800 GP: 103

(mean Ct S.D)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1.19

3.40

2.56

1.35

1.26

Inter-assay (mean Ct S.D) CV (%)

34.950.48

34.320.72

33.080.68

28.491.41

28.780.86

33.840.57

31.300.45

1.37

2.10

2.06

4.95

2.99

1.68

1.44

Intra-assay

37.250.98

Undetected

35.450.46

31.561.01

36.550.40

34.580.80

(mean Ct S.D) CV (%)

2.63

-

1.30

Inter-assay

37.910.96

Undetected

35.390.79

(mean Ct S.D) CV (%)

2.53

-

2.23

T

1.81

RI P

31.071.03

3.20

3.32

1.09

2.31

31.941.65

31.221.35

36.990.99

35.110.81

4.32

2.68

2.31

SC

a

1.68

5.17

VLPs with GP fragment was used for the assessment of the kit of Puruikang; VLPs with NP

MA NU

NP: 120 GP: 110

CV (%)

fragment was use for evaluating the other six assays.

Parameter, SD, standard deviations; CV, coefficient of variation.

PT

ED

b

DISCUSSION

CE

In response to the outbreak of Ebolavirus (Zaire) in West Africa by 2014, a variety

AC

of diagnostic real time PCR reagents were manufactured subsequently in China. As the kits for qualitative detection, the parameters of precision, analytical sensitivity, accuracy and the detection ability for the serum samples panel were necessary for the performance evaluation. However, clinical samples had not been transported to China for strong contagiosity and high mortality of EBOV which was classified as the pathogen of BSL 4 agents. Without the positive samples, we could only test two of the most essential indicators, analytical sensitivity and precision, for qualitative kits assessment in this study. Meanwhile, in order to evaluate all of the kits in uniform standards, the same template for Zaire epidemic strain was selected and packaged in

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT VLPs as mimic. For analytical sensitivity, when the concentration was less than 50 copies/ml only

RI P

T

the kit of Daan gene could ensure the effective detection, which indicated Daan gene was the most sensitive among all of the participated assays. The sensible capability of

SC

Sansure was followed closely with Daan gene. There was no significant difference of the LOD between Huada, Puruikang, Tianlong and Kehua. The maximum for

MA NU

analytical sensitivity was acquired by ZJ BioTech, which demonstrated the inferior detection capability in the seven different kits. Concerned about the precision, the maximum for SD (Ct value: 1.65) and CV (5.17%) were both acquired by Kehua,

ED

which was just over the requirement of 5% and indicated that there was still room to

PT

improve. In contrast, it was worth to praise for the good performance of ZJ BioTech and Sansure, especially in the evaluation with high concentration of VLPs. The

CE

remaining kits were similar in the precision evaluation of three different

AC

concentrations.

Overall, Daan gene had superior stability and sensitivity for EBOV detection in the seven kits. The performance of the kits from Puruikang, Huada and Sansure were creditable in all participated assays. For ZJ BioTech, there was notable reproducibility and tolerableness LOD. The repeatability and reproducibility for Kehua was improvable. Additionally, Tianlong kits achieved acceptable results in the evaluation of precision and analytical sensitivity. As the matter of fact, all of the seven commercial kits could meet the general requirement of LOD<1000 copies/mL. In clinical work, the viral load in plasma of

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT EVD patients was often no less than 105 copis/mL (Schieffelin JS et al., 2014). It was usually seemed as negative results when the viral load of Ebola was less than 1000

RI P

T

copies/mL (Kreuels B et al., 2014). Moreover, the outcome of real time PCR could only be one of valid evidences. The onset symptoms should be taken into

SC

consideration for the diagnosis of EVD (Saijo M et al., 2014). Therefore, all of the participated assays were eligible for Zaire species of Ebolavirus clinical detection. To

MA NU

reflect the repeatability and reproducibility, the intra-assay and inter-assay precision were tested. The requirement of CV<5% was satisfied by six kits and Kehua in the concentration of more than 800 copies/mL, which supplied the trustworthy

ED

prerequisite for accuracy.

PT

In our study, VLPs took the place of positive samples and was adopted for kit evaluation. As an alternative, the selected fragments and target sites encapsulated in

CE

VLPs were the principal element for consideration. It was a guarantee for successful

AC

detection when the primers could be paired with the target sequences in VLPs. For EBOV detection, the sites of NP (Towner JS et al., 2004; Huang Y et al., 2012), GP (Trombley AR et al., 2010), L (Gibb TR et al., 2001) and 5’ LTR (Kurosaki Y et al., 2007) were the most conventional choices for primers design in previous research. In combination with the diagnostic condition in 2014 (Baize Sb et al., 2014), the whole length of 3’ LTR and NP, along with parts of GP, L and 5’ LTR of the epidemic strain were all designed to enfold in VLPs. This is the first time to conduct the reagent evaluation with VLPs encapsulated target RNA. Though VLPs as the substitution do have some disadvantages, such as

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the high variability of RNA virus could not be reflected and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy for

RI P

T

kits could not been evaluated. However, the advantages far outweigh its disadvantages. First, the structure of VLPs, with the capsid of MS2 bacteriophage and targeted RNA

SC

fragment, is similar to the real RNA virus, which could implement the complete simulation for viral detection. Second, it is flexible and optional for targeted RNA

MA NU

fragment encapsulated into VLPs. Third, VLPs is stable in room temperatures for a long time. Fourth, the biological hazard of the real virus could be neglected because there hardly any danger of MS2 VLP for human under normal condition. Fifth, the

ED

preparative technique of VLPs is mature and feasible. Additionally, the source of

PT

target fragment in VLPs is clearly which confirms that it could be used into the related evaluation work. Hence, VLPs could replace the clinical samples for kits evaluation

AC

CE

and the relevant results are credible and guaranteed.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Huiqing Li from Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences for instructing

RI P

T

Probit Analysis with SPSS. We also thank all of the reagent manufacturers that provided the real-time RT-PCR kits for EBOV detection in this study.

SC

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China 863 program (grant No. 2011AA02A116) and “AIDS

AC

CE

PT

ED

China (No. 2013ZX10004805).

MA NU

and hepatitis, and other major infectious disease control and prevention” Program of

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT REFERENCES Baize

S, Pannetier

D, Oestereich

L, Rieger

T, Koivogui

L, Magassouba

RI P

T

N, Soropogui B, Sow MS, Keïta S, De Clerck H, Tiffany A, Dominguez G, Loua M, Traoré A, Kolié M, Malano ER, Heleze E, Bocquin A, Mély S, Raoul H, Caro

SC

V, Cadar D, Gabriel M, Pahlmann M, Tappe D, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Impouma B, Diallo AK,Formenty P, Van Herp M, Günther S (2014) Emergence of Zaire Ebola

MA NU

virus disease in Guinea. N Engl J Med 371:1418-1425.

Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM (2007) Fields’ virology. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

ED

Gao GF, Feng Y (2014) On the ground in Sierra Leone. Science 346:666.

PT

Gibb TR, Norwood DA Jr, Woollen N, Henchal EA (2001) Development and evaluation of a fluorogenic 5' nuclease assay to detect and differentiate between Ebola

CE

virus subtypes Zaire and Sudan. J Clin Microbiol 39:4125-4130.

AC

Huang Y, Wei H, Wang Y, Shi Z, Raoul H, Yuan Z (2012) Rapid detection of filoviruses by real-time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assays. Virol Sin 27:273-277.

Kreuels B, Wichmann D, Emmerich P, Schmidt-Chanasit J, de Heer G, Kluge S, Sow A, Renné T, Günther S, Lohse AW, Addo MM, Schmiedel S (2014) A case of sever Ebola virus infection complicated by gram-negative septicemia. N Engl J Med 371:2394-2401. Kurosaki Y, Takada A, Ebihara H, Grolla A, Kamo N, Feldmann H, Kawaoka Y, Yasuda J (2007) Rapid and simple detection of Ebola virus by reverse

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification. J Virol Methods 141:78-83. Ledgerwood JE, DeZure AD, Stanley DA, Novik L, Enama ME, Berkowitz NM, Hu

RI P

T

Z, Joshi G, Ploquin A, Sitar S, Gordon IJ, Plummer SA, Holman LA, Hendel CS, Yamshchikov G, Roman F, Nicosia A, Colloca S, Cortese R, Bailer RT, Schwartz

SC

RM, Roederer M, Mascola JR, Koup RA, Sullivan NJ, Graham BS; the VRC 207 Study Team (2014) Chimpanzee adenovirus vector Ebola vaccine – preliminary report.

McElroy

AK, Erickson

MA NU

N Engl J Med (Epub ahead of print).

BR, Flietstra

TD, Rollin

PE, Nichol

ST, Towner

JS, Spiropoulou CF (2014) Biomarker correlates of survival in pediatric patients with

ED

Ebols virus disease. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1683-1690.

diagnostic

PT

Saijo M, Niikura M, Ikegami T, Kurane I, Kurata T, Morikawa S (2006) Laboratory systems

for Ebola and Marburg hemorrhagic fevers

developed

with

CE

recombinant proteins. Clin Vaccine Immunol 13:444-451.

AC

Schieffelin JS, Shaffer JG, Goba A, Gbakie M, Gire SK, Colubri A, Sealfon RS, Kanneh L, Moigboi A, Momoh M, Fullah M, Moses LM, Brown BL, Andersen KG,Winnicki S, Schaffner SF, Park DJ, Yozwiak NL, Jiang PP, Kargbo D, Jalloh S, Fonnie M, Sinnah V, French I, Kovoma A, Kamara FK, Tucker V, Konuwa E, Sellu J, Mustapha

I, Foday

M, Yillah

M, Kanneh

F, Saffa

S, Massally

JL, Boisen

ML, Branco LM, Vandi MA, Grant DS, Happi C, Gevao SM, Fletcher TE, Fowler RA,Bausch DG, Sabeti PC, Khan SH, Garry RF; KGH Lassa Fever Program; Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium; WHO Clinical Response Team (2014) Clinical illness and outcomes in patients with Ebola in Sierra Leone. N Engl J Med

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 371:2092-2100. Song L, Sun S, Li B, Pan Y, Li W, Zhang K, Li J (2011) External quality

RI P

T

assessment for enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 detection by reverse transcription-PCR using armored RNA as a virus surrogate. J Clin Microbiol

SC

49:3591-3595.

Sun Y, Jia T, Sun Y, Han Y, Wang L, Zhang R, Zhang K, Lin G, Xie J, Li J. 2013. (H7N9) Virus

MA NU

External quality assessment for Avian Influenza A

detection

using

armored RNA. J Clin Microbiol 51:4055-4059.

Towner JS, Rollin PE, Bausch DG, Sanchez A, Crary SM, Vincent M, Lee

ED

WF, Spiropoulou CF, Ksiazek TG, Lukwiya M, Kaducu F, Downing R, Nichol ST

PT

(2004) Rapid diagnosis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever by reverse transcripition-PCR in an outbreak setting and assessment of patient viral load as a predictor of outcome. J

CE

Virol 78:4330-4341.

AC

Trombley AR, Wachter L, Garrison J, Buckley-Beason VA, Jahrling J, Hensley LE, Schoepp RJ, Norwood DA, Goba A, Fair JN, Kulesh DA (2010) Compregensive panel of real-time TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assays for detection and absolute quantification of filoviruses, arenaviruses and New World hantavirused. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82:954-960. World Health Organization (2014) Ebola virus disease: fact sheet no. 103. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Fig.1 Organization of Ebola virus genome and detected target regions for

Ebola

virus

genome

is

arranged

in

The

SC

3’LTR-NP-VP35-VP40-GP-VP30-VP24-L-5’LTR.

RI P

T

commercial assays.

the

follow

detection

assays

order: were

substituted by letters. A: ZJ BioTech; B: Daan Gene; C: HuaDa BioTech; D:

MA NU

Puruikang; E: TianLong; F: Sansure; G: Kehua. The detection regions for the seven

AC

CE

PT

ED

commercial kits were marked in the sketch map.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights Several real-time PCR kits for Zaire Ebolavirus have been evaluated in China.



Viruses like particles encapsulated EBOV RNA have been prepared as positive

RI P

T



substitutes.



The limit of detection and the precision were completed for the assays.

SC



Requirements for clinical EBOV detection are basically satisfied except

It is feasible for viruses like particles as a mimic of positive samples in

CE

PT

ED

assays evaluation.

AC



MA NU

one reagent.