Fluid Phase Equilibria, Elsevier Scientific
10 (1983)
Publishing
327-336
Company,
327
Amsterdam
-
THE EXTRACTION OF COAL WITH SUPCRCRITICAL
M.J.
FINN,
National
C.J.
Coal
BOWER and R.D. Board,
Gloucestershire
GL52
Printed in ‘rhe Netherlands
HYL)xClCARBO:JMIXTURES
HUGHES
Coal
Research
4RZ
(England)
Establishwart,
Stoke
Orchard,
Cheltenham,
ABSTRACT The National Coal Board has developed a process for converting coal into distillable liquids based on the extraction by supercritical fluids of fragments of coal molecules produced by thermolysis. The resultant coal extract has desirable properties for subsequent hydroprocessing. This paper outlines process requirements and describes how these were realised in a 10 kg h-1 pilot plant. Results illustrating the effects of main process variables are given, using examples taken from experimental work employing a simulated processderived solvent as extractant. Yields and analyses are presented for products obtained under varied processing conditions. INTRODUCT ION It the
is
apparent
supply
of
happens
both
coal,
fuels
The in
chemical
reserves
Two processes
have
coal
that
extract
principal
been
developed
is
coal
is
de-ashed
in
first
taken
a high-boiling
liquid
solvent
.
The
employs
a much
second
temperatures Extract results
ion
above (SGE) .
the
critical
This
illustrating
the
paper
and
the
into
a stage
at
which
projected into
society,
past
most
chemical
0378-3812/83/$03.00
compounds
used
to for
is
values.
constituting
will
decade,
distillable
and
obvious been liquids,
termed
of
It the the
a 25
and yield
Liquid
thus
the
latter
the
at
has
liquids.
The One process
Extraction
pressures
and
Supercritical technique
coal
have
0 1983 Elsevier Science Publishers 13.V.
high
Gas
and presents
process.
extremely
the
resultant
coal.
Solvent
termed
experimental
Each
that light
dissolving
solvent, is
tonne/day
PROCESS REQUIREMENTS The
that
it
source,
the
continuation.
solution
lower-boiling
describes
operation
for
is
this
Assuming
by
an alternative
coal
hydroprocessing
(LSE)
from
surpluses,
before
occur.
petroleum,
of
the
method
uses
will required
therefore,
to is
the
that
products.
plant
before
is
has
of
and
price
still
them
those
conversion
petroleum
pilot
difference
the
in
are
replace
Board
at
short-term
exhausted,
rise
times
crude
development feature
Coal
aimed for
common
notwithstanding
become
to
many
National
research
a replacement
equipment
later,
feedstocks
and necessary
proven
candidate.
or will
and progressive
and
economic with
engaged as
sooner
petroleum
a considerable
automotive be
that
crude
molecular
328 weights.
They
are
together
fused
these
consist
structures
oxygen,
are
nitrogen
large, coal
molecules
this
is
the
large
tend
to
weaker
process
by
under
using
to
use
of
a gas
is
that
confers
the
should
be
of
significance,
to
extract
is
not
employ
the
have
with
for
solvent
fluid
is
that
soluble
components, by heating,
are
by
reactive broken
the
form,
and
formation
order
radicals
achieved
above
its
critical
in
the
density
is
into
solution.
tension
of
the
solvent
that
the
critical
to
must
be
the
SGE
temperature
taken
surface
and penetration
of
In
the
thus
originally
is
be
very
produced
This
a gas, to
benefit
of
in
to
be
sufficiently The
effects
are
into
the
coal
with
higher
a regeneration be
in
the
liquid
but
use.
latter
at
It
can
be
be
be
even
possible pressure
stable
at
the
inclusion
solvent
as
advantageous
it
would
to extract
in be
losses
also
oxygen
atmospheric
the
scale
though
is
stabilising
implies
is
would
It
must
thus
this
even
aliphatic,
the
phase
On an industrial
process-derived,
than
containing
extract.
solvent
properties,
yields,
stage.
The
repeated
donor
of
density
type
better
although
solvent
Chemical
Compounds
processing
iLs
hydrogen
being
c’sal.
temperature
a high
pressure.
general the
selection.
permit
allowing
effective,
flirther
solvent to
is
excess.ive
of
Solubility
for
to
use
nature
in
choice
temperature,
solvents
shown
and obtaining
the
the
been
water.
compounds
of
a liquid
fragments
are
irreversible.
residut,.
and
non-destructively.
bonds
is
s,olvent
solvent
the
conditions
radicals
the
process
in the
the
occur,
from
a criterion
process
the
low-boiling
extraction
contaminants
operating
frorr
additional
aromatic
and nitrogen
formed
many of recombination
molecular
without
expected
undesirable
but
into
strains
w!lich
containing
molecules
coal
down
the
rings
complexity,
rings
the
dissolving
radicals
material
influencing to
maintained
be
and carbon
broken
free
carbon of
hindered.
close
be
be
rendering of
problems
factor
to
of
Under
although
large
not
The main
to
removed
even
no wetting
particle
would
so
enable
absent,
yield
degrees
Because
capable
bonds,
and
aromatic
heteroatoms.
the
bonds,
of
various
rings
Furthermore,
a relatively
pressure,
high
up:
heteroatom
solution
of
thermolysis.
break
an acceptable into
as found
rapidly.
carbon-carbon
clusters
alicyclic
therefore
by
molecules
produce taken
have
achieved
recombine
the
by
been
of
structures
linked
has
and
stronger
unit
and sulphur
no solvent
The
are
principally
into
the
necessary
are
small.
LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS Initial stirred solvent, passed the before
work
on developing
Lhe ideas
in
into
a coal
charge
autoclaves, the
autoclave
through
disadvantages extraction),
when
which was
electrically
critical
that
heating
relatively
large
had
slow
and
been
(allowing
volunes
laboratory
employed
WRS placed.
heated
conditions was
the
of
filling
of
solvent
a stream
achieved.
This
had
with was
technique
had
to occur
recombination solvent
conventional
After
to
be used,
and it
329 was
difficult
to
relate
the
results
continuous
process.
These
miniature,
unstirred
autoclave
porous
plates.
heating
were
Results
from
this
proportions
of
operating
by
work
the
and
batch-wise
respective
effects
SOLVENT
solvent
was
whole
of
in
experiments. to
the
to
coal
However, it
ratio
and
and
rapid
properties
rates
the
not
in
relation
to
for
process
possible
contact
operations
to
separate
the
time.
COAL
4iJv
RESIDUE SEPARATORS
HIGH PRESSURE WMP
RECYCLE PUMP
STILL f
LET- DOWN L
FI G. 1. DIAGRAMMATIC PILOT In
order to
batches
to
balance of
overcome
build
Figure
extract
of In
the
limitations
plant, operate
large
enough
processing
operation,
to
of
which
would
conditions
capable 1.
a pilot
data,
hydroprocessing unit,
FLOWSHEET
OF 10kgti’
PILOT
PLANT
PLANT
decided mass
EXTRACT
WATER
STORAGE
in to
be
small
enable
carried
1.0 kg
h-1
of and
coal,
on
of
mode,
experiments out
batch
capable
a continuous
be
temperatures
using
would
and into
a consistent .is shown
pressures
are
of
sandbath.
sufficient
since
was
between
substantial
quantities
coal,
a
retained
a fluidised
extracting
s;olvent
extract
using
was
included, in
a scaled-up
by
charge
assembly
desirable
to
overcome
g coal
feasibility
produced
solvent
experiments
partly
a 50
the
the
relative of
for
determined
hydroprocessing
still
which
coil
showed
batch
were
immersing
coal,
conditions,
preliminary were
in
A preheating achieved
from
limitations
apparatus
generating would the
was
produce effect
of
feedstock.
diagraun~atically stabilised
it
reliable
by
The in circulat-
330 ing
before
only,
solvent
solvent.
This
Pump 9 and
preheated
sandbath.
coil,
slurry
of
the
Since the
the
whirh
of
extract/solvent is
collected,
by
the
and
mixture
partial
produced
Solvent
by
Extract to
is
which
normally
off
are
cooled
from
feed
a heated
in
a larger resulting
the of
still
as
kettle
of
cyclone-
solids
the
fluid.
in
a single
of
where
the to
they and
which
is end
the
the
solvent, reuse.
each
in
virtually
on cooling pressurised
run.
The
almost
indistinguishable
course
it
has
followed
separator.
for
solidifies
still
vapour
condenser,
collected of
extract the
by water
leave
a by
The
heat.
and returned
returned
a liquid,
as
accompanied
latent
a total
as
is
is
accompanied
settling,
solid,,
although
boiling-point, precipitated
a still
out
to
sampled
the
is
to
vapour,
Residue at
pressure
Expansion
system,
emptied
coal,
and
The
depressurised
extract
scrubbed
gravity
the
particulate
the
the
passes
and
solid.
and
a free-flowing
appearance
the
brittle
in
a primary
viscosity
is
converted
the
being
measured
from
black
is
into
by
low
droplets.
heat
through
to
completes
atmospheric
Solvent
separated
the
and
decomposition,
passage
run
a remeltable
vessels
are
its
solvent
sandbath.
which
by
its
liquid
droplets
are
by
passes
solution
vapour,
solvent.
immersed
the
coal
a reciprocating
valve.
above
passed
coal
Gases
and water
unchanged
is
cf
by
a separator.
the
sensible
escaping
reflux
easier
to
coal
crushed
by
a coil
a second
filter
made
far
in
residual
solids,
a tenuous
SOOC as
any
gases
by
is
to
coalesces
some
and
of
pressure
in
pressure-control
temperature
rapidly
a cooling
all
a slurry
extracted
a secondary
being
expands
are
temperature
to
to
critical
temperature
radicals at
thence
system
changed the
selected
coal
virtually the
solvent
mist
the
separation
across
is
solution
and
removed
stage
to
super-critical
removal,
feed above
maintained
separator
Having
the
pressurised
Thermolysed
contactor
type
is
residue in
a high
is size
degree
and
of
porosity.
RESULTS The
solvent
aromatic
from
mixture
solvent
the had
critical
was
products the
pressure
It
rather
higher,
since
either
the
more
than
critical one
the
3.1 is
Some
as
was
reported
by
that Rzasa
mixtures
by
in
& Katz,,
results the
4400C
the
actual
normally
anomalous
present.
the
present
in
by
critical
obtained
in
pseudo-
and
pressure (ref
pressures experiments
investigations
The
and the
Prausnitz
Comings
an
distillation
(713oK),
modified
of
isomeric
process.
pseudo-critical
quoted have
mixture
two
a particular
hydrogenation
of
calculated
a made-up each
of
extract
temperature
M Pa,
was
compound,
representative
subsequent
temperature phase
here
aromatic:
probable
work
hydrocarbon
component.
near
work
chosen
of
of
(ref.1).
binary
the
pseudo-critical
method
that
in
a fully-hydrogenated
This
forms. cut
employed
and
also
.2),
was showed
higher at
Gunn
than
5 M Pa
suggested
that
331 of
Yield
using
to
ments
of
coal
coal
possible
some
(for
a non-reactive
solvent
as
extract
has
ation
of
pressure
60
its
of too
process
rate
with
prevent
become
and
The
increases to
is
solvent,
ratio.
recombination
which
a given
coal
controlled of
will
in
conditions
occur,
matched
the
and residence
temperature.
extract
causing to
a careful to
the
must
insoluble
weight
requires
teaperature,
to
molecular
size
solvent
be
removed Even
precipitation
choice
in of
type
of
solvent
used.
a
s
30 1,
FIG.2
,
I
1
I
5 EXTRACTION
10
15
20
EFFECT
PRESSURE
OF
(M F’al
PRESSURE
ON EXTRACT
LLO
L20
EXTRACTION
FIG. 3
EFFECT
YIELD
A
A
Lao
160 TEMPERATURE
OF TEMPERATURE
(“Cl
ON EXTRACT
as in
quickly solution,
material
quantity,
W
0,
frag-
Optimiz-
solution.
I .. is
and
molecular
residue.
remain
time),
pressure
aof extractable
and
temperature,
extract
by
liberation
recombination
high
particle
type,
YIELD
Extract yield, shown as a percentage approximately
of dry, ash-free coal, increases in an
linear fashion with pressure
temperature
of 420%,
significant
increase.
where doubling
(Fig.2), except at the lowest
the pressure from 10 to 20 ?I Pa produced no
In contrast, the results for the efrect of temperature
suggest (Fig.3), but by no means establish, yield in the region 44Oo-460°C.
the presence of a broad maximum for
These results can be explained by the conjecall available material has been extracted
ture that, at the lowest temperature,
even at 10 M Pa, whilst at the higher temperatures extract recombination
and precipitation
inefficient
extraction or
occurs as the solvent density falls.
It was difficult for us to determine accurate values for solvent density at condition,
but calculations
temperature,
and generalised
values quoted above.
have been made based on reduced pressure, reduced compressibility
should have some significance, calculated
8y replotting
density, Figure 4 is obtained.
is, within experimental of the subcritical
factor, using the pseudo-critical
Whilst the absolute values are unreliable, relative values the results for yield against
This shows that the yield of extract
limits, linear with solvent density, with the exception
results at 420°C which lie below the line
/
300
5M3
LOO
CAlflUTED
SOWENT
FIG. &. EFFECT
DENSITY
600 (kg m -31
OF DENSITY
ON EXTRACT
The effect of solvent to coal ratio is dcmonstratfd 10 M Pa and 20 M Pa, 460%.
At the lower pressure,
YIELD
in Figure 5 for tests at
the yield is linear with
solvent to coal ratio in the range covered, indicating
that reduced solvent
density can be at least partly compensated by increased dilution. yield at 4:l
However,
the
and 10 M Pa is still below that obtained at 2:l and 20 M Pa, and it
is likely Lhat process economics would
favour the higher pressure and lower
333 ratio. 2:l to
It LO 3:l
4:l
will at
be
extract
of
that
whilst
20 M Pa produces
and 5:l
extraction
seen
is
a larger
negligible.
soluble
It
material
concentration
in
increasing
the
can
yield, be
deduced
was virtually solvent
nf
the
solvent
to
coal
the
benefit
in
further
thaL
complete
about
ratio
from
increasing
a~
this
pressure
at
3:1,
representing
the
15%.
60 ./--A-
8 cl
10 M Pa
/
* I-
I
I
I
I
1
2
3
1
5
MLVENTl
FIG
5 EFFECT The
molecular
isopiestically, information
OF
COAL
SOLVENTlCOAL
weight
of
the
and corrected on the
(w/w)
extracts for
mechanisms
ON EXTRACT
produced traces
or
yield
(number
average, present)
(Figure
6).
OF
CALCULATED
SOLVENT
determined provides
At
rach
pressure
1
500 SOLVENT
YIELD
:solvent
I
LOO
EFFECT
thtl
determining
LOO1
FIG. 6.
RATIO
600 DENSITY
DENSITY WEIGHT
1 kg
m-3
1
ON EXTRACT
MOLECULAR
an
334 LIW
molecular
weight
falls progressively
solvent density is thereby reduced.
as the temperature
Similarly,
is increased and the
increasing the pressure and The
thereby the density in general produces an increased molecular weight. implication material
is that as the temperature
increases the amount of extractable
produced also increases, whilsl the size of the molecular fragments
decreases.
However, the ability of the solvent to hold material
is reduced as its density
in solution
falls, leading to a tendency for the heavier species
to precipitate.
This is the likely explanation
with temperature
at each pressure suggested by LIW results o1 sigure
for the maximum value of yield
Changes in extract composition with temperature Table 1. hydrogen
3.
and pressure are shown in
When compared with the coal, all extracts show higher carbon and contents, and a higher hydrogen
to carbon atomic ratio.
sulphur are reduced below the coal values, but nitrogen presumably
due to its occurrence
Results at constant pressure composition with temperature;
Oxygen and
tends to increase,
in stable ring-structures. (10 M Pa) show a progressive
change in extract
the carbon content increases and the hydrogen,
oxygen and sulphur contents fall as tenlperature increases,
At the same time
extract molecular weight falls, even though the extract yield does not change significantly.
Increasing pressure at constant temperature
(44O@Cj produces
an increase in yield from 41.6% to 57.82, accompanied by compositional
changes.
Carbon content is constant, but the increasing molecular weight is accompanied by an increase in oxygen and sulphur and a reduction in hydrogen.
TABLE 1 Product yields, extract and coal analyses Extraction conditions
Yield Extract analyses of Extract Ash C HO Pressure Temp Solvent % w daf content density* coal M Pa kg m-3 % w daf oC %W 5
10
20
440
470
41.6
0.21
82.5 6.6
N
S
Molecular weight atomic (number ratio average) H/C
8.4 1.29 1.19 0.94
520
420
557
46.1
0.07
82.3 6.1
8.9 1.31 1.24 0.90
630
440
538
41.5
0.09
82.5 6.4
8.6 1.37 1.17 0.93
580
460
511
47.1
0.11
83.3 6.3
8.0 1.37 1.11 0.90
540
480
483
47.6
0.13
84.4 6.1
7.1 1.45 0.98 0.86
500
440
599
57.8
0.09
82.51 6.1
8.7 1.21 1.39 0.89
600
12.0
80.0 5.1 11.6 1.33 1.94 0.74
Typical coal analysis * calculated
-
335
TABLE 2 Composition of gaseous products (nitrogen and oxygen free basis) PressurP:
10 M Pa
Constituent
% w of gas
Extraction temperature oC
Gas yield % w daf coal
CO
CO2
H2S
H2
CH4
Other hydrocarbons
420
3.2
6.1
50.8
15.0
0.3
13.7
14.1
440
4. 8
4.7
42.5
10.7
0.4
15.5
26.2
460
5.7
5.7
34.5
14.7
1.0
19.2
24.9
480
7.0
4.8
30.3
9.6
1.1
21.3
32.9
Yield of gas increases progressively changes, Table 2.
with
At the lowest temperature
temperature
the proportion
PROCESS
of carbon dioxide falls to one-third,
of hydrocarbon
over conventional
can be adjusted
which utilises
enhanced
in the extract,
The process
bituminous different
conditions,
advantage
the proportions
such that, in the context
of the SGE
coal conversion processes. of extract and
of a self sufficient
plant,
only part of the coal the hydrogen leading to lower hydrogen
to carbon ratio is
requirements
in downstream
This does not reduce the utility of the residue which has an ash-
free calorific
processed
a potential
the residue as a fuel, the most economic ratio can be obtained.
Secondly, by extracting
processing.
illustrate
liquid solvent extraction
First, by choice of operating residue
and aver half
constituents.
IMPLICATIONS
The results of this program process
and its composition
As the gas yield increases with
dioxide, with about a quarter hydrocarbons.
the gas consists
temperature,
0ve.r half the gas is carbon
value similar is adaptable
to that of the coal. to a wide variety
of feedstocks.
Coals successfully
in the 10 kg h-1 unit include British coking as well as non-caking coals, Australian types of solvent.
perhydrous With
coal and North American
these attributes,
lignite, using
it is apparent
conversion
of coal may prove to be a field in which supercritical
technology
has a future role.
that the fluid
336
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Authors
thank the National Coal Board for permission
to publish this
paper, and the European Coal and Steel Community for financial support. views expressed
are those of the authors and not necessarily
The
those of the Board.
REFERENCES 1. R.C. Reid and T.K. Sherwood, The Properties of Gases anh Liquids, McGraw Hill Book Co.. 2nd Edition, p.316. 2. E.W. Comings, High Pressure Technology, McGraw Hill Book Co., 1956, p.300.