THE
HARDENING
OF COPPER
SINGLE
M. J. MAKINt
CRYSTALS
and
BY ELECTRON
IRRADIATION*
T. H. BLEWITT$
Irradiation with 4 Mev electrons has been found to increase the critical shear stress of copper single crystals and to raise the whole stress-strain curve to higher stresses. The effect is independent of the irradiation temperature below a dose of ~5 pA/hr cm+; above this dose the critical shear stress of specimens irradiated at 20°C increases to a saturation value of 0.5 kg. mm2 after 40 pA/hr cm-z. Specimens irradiated at - 195”C, however, continue to harden and after 100 ,uA/hr cm?’ have a critical shear stress of 1 kg/mm2. Crystals irradiated at - 78°C lie on an intermediate curve indicating that the rate of hardening is a continuous function of the temperature and is not due to irradiating above or below a particular recovery stage. Annealing at 20°C after irradiation at - 195°C produces only ~10 per cent recovery in shear stress. The annealing of the hardening after irradiation at 20°C commences at ~80°C and continues up to temperatures above 400°C. No discrete recovery stages are visible. Thin film transmission electron microscopy does not reveal any clustered damage. Electron hardening is compared in detail with that due to neutron hardening and it is concluded that the absence of the displacement spikes has a very profound effect. DURCISSEMENT
DE MONOCRISTAUX
DE CUIVRE
PAR
IRRADIATION
ELECTRONIQUE
On a observe qu’une irradiation par des electrons de 4 Mev aocroissait la contrainte tangentielle critique de monocristaux de cuivre, et deplapait toute la courbe contrainte-deformation vers des contraintes plus &levees. L’effet observe est independent de la temperature d’irradiation au-dessous d’une dose d’environ 5 pA/hr cm+; au-dessus de cette dose, la contrainte tangentielle critique des echantillons irradies a 20°C croit jusqu’a une valeur de saturation de 0,5 kg/mma aprBs 40 pA/hr CII-~. Les Bchantillons irradies a - 195”C, cependant, continuent a durcir et presentent une contrainte tangentielle critique de 1 kg/nun2 apres 100 yA/hr cm+. Les cristaux irradies a -78°C se situent sur une courbe intermediaire indiquant que la vitesse de durcissement est une fonction continue de la temperature et n’est pas due a ce que l’irradiation est faite au-dessus ou au-dessous d’une temperature de restauration particuliere. Un traitement thermique Q 20°C apres une irradiation L -195°C n’amene qu’une restauration de la contrainte tangentielle critique d’environ 10%. La disparition du durcissement dil a l’irradiation a 20°C debute a 80°C environ et se poursuit jusqu’a des temperatures superieures a 400°C. On n’observe pas de stades distincts dans la restauration des proprietes et l’examen de pellicules minces en microscopic Blectronique ne revele pas de deterioration du materiau. Les auters Btablissent une comparaison detail&e entre les durcissements par irradiation Qlectronique et par irradiation neutronique et concluent que I’absence de zones fortement perturbees dans l’irradiation 6lectronique a une t&s grande importance. VERFESTIGUNG
VON
KUPFEREINKRISTALLEN
DURCH
ELEKTRONENBESTRAHLUNG
Bestrahlung mit 4MeV-Elektronen erhoht die kritische Schubspannung von Kupfereinkristallen und verschiebt die ganze Spannungs-Dehnungskurve zu hoheren Spannungen. Unterhalb einer Dosis von 5 PAh cm-* ist der Effekt unabhangig von der Bestrahlungstemperatur. Oberhalb dieser Dosis steigt bei Proben, die bei 20°C bestrahlt wurden, die kritische Schubspannung auf einen Sattigungswert von 0.5 kp/ mm2 nach 40 ~Ah/cm*. Bei -195°C bestrahlte Proben verfestigen sich jedoch weiter und haben nach 100 @h/cm2 eine kritische Schubspannung von 1 kp/nun2. Bei -78°C bestrahlte Kristalle liegen auf einer mittleren Kurve; das deutet darauf hin, da8 die Verfestigungsgeschwindigkeit stetig von der Temperatur abhangt und nicht auf Bestrahlung oberhalb oder unterhalb einer besonderen Erholungsstufe beruht. Nach Bestrahlung bei -195°C fiihrt Anlassen bei 20°C nur zu ~10% Erholung der Schubspannung. Die Erholung der Verfestigung nach Bestrahlung bei 20°C beginnt bei ~80°C und dauert bis zu Temperaturen tiber 400°C an. Diskrete Erholungsstufen sind nicht sichtbar. Transmissionsaufnahmen diinner Filme im Elektronenmikroskop zeigen keine Schiidigung in Form von Clusters. Die Elektronenverfestigung wird im einzelnen mit der Verfestigung durch Neutronen verlichen; es wird geschlossen, da13 das Fehlen stark gestiirter Zonen (displacement spikes) einen sehr bedeutenden EinAuIj hat. INTRODUCTION
The hardening
2 mm in copper.
of metals by neutron
well known and the main characteristics have been established
irradiation
is
of the process
in a number of different metals
work on the mechanical
changes due to electron
limited.
Dixon and Meechano)
ness of copper
of various crystal structures. In contrast, very little attention has so far been paid to hardening by irradia-
Previous
property
increased
from
irradiation
is very
report that the hard44.3 to 47.7 kg/mm2
after irradiation by 5 x lO1s electrons/cm2 at -20°C and that half this increase annealed after 8 hr at 170°C.
tion with charged particles and, in the case of heavy
Dieckampf2), in a study of 0.010 in. diam. large grained
charged particles,
polycrystalline
this is partly explained
by the very
short range of these particles making it impossible
to
irradiate conventional test specimens. In the case of electrons however this restriction need not apply, since the range of a 4 MeV electron is of the order of * Received August 1, 1961. t Metallurgy Division, A.E.R.E., $ Argonne National Laboratory, ACTA
METALLURGIA,
VOL.
Harwell, England. Illinois, U.S.A.
10, MARCH
1962
after 100 pA/hr cm-2 at
-195°C but no change in the yield stress. The effect of electron irradiation on the mechanical properties of metals is of considerable theoretical interest as a comparison to the effect of neutron irradiation because of the different distributions of damage
241
copper wires, reports an increase in the
flow stress at 1 y0 elongation
following
the
two
types
of
irradiation.
ACTA
242
Energetic
electrons,
because
METALLURGICA,
of their small mass, can
VOL.
cooling
10, 1962
by a liquid
is the only
transfer little energy to a metal atom and hence the
removing
the heat.
damage consists of relatively
specimen
and the accelerator
shielding
the specimen
of four defects distributed crystal.
isolated pairs or groups
at random
There is no possibility
throughout
of anything
the
like a
displacement spike being formed. Neutrons, however, because of their heavier mass and the absence of Rutherford
collisions, transfer on average a very much
flow down it. less
than
of a direct collision
difference
between
Primary
a 1 MeV neutron
knock-ons,
because
and a of their
charge and large mass, rapidly lose energy by collision with neighbouring to be produced disturbance. liberated
atoms and hence the damage tends in isolated
regions
A considerable
of very
quantity
during the formation
heavy
of heat is also
of these “zones”,
the
must be thin to avoid
from the beam.
The temperature
10°C
Calculations
atom).
way of
between
For irradi-
ations at 20°C the problem was solved by directing a jet of water onto the top of the specimen and letting it
greater energy per collision (up to 6,000 eV in the case copper
practicable
The film of liquid
in
the
rise in the water was
maximum
beam
showed that t’he maximum
current.
temperature
between the centre and the surface of the
specimen was also of the order of 10°C. Irradiations were also carried out at -20% and -78°C by this method using calcium chloride solution and
methyl
-195”C,
alcohol,
respectively.
To
the specimen was suspended
irradiate
at
in a target box
and
(Fig. 1) in a stream of liquid nitrogen blown through
exists of many atomic rearrangements during the cooling of the zone. Seegerc3) has estimated that approximately 20 per cent of the atoms within a
under pressure, the specimen being clamped to a thin copper window. To minimize the heating in the target
zone are ejected by a replacement
slit
the possibility
leaving an excess of vacancies The detailed
damage
neutron irradiation character,
collision mechanism
behind.
resulting
from
electron
and
of a metal is thus very different in
and it was felt that the mechanical
played
by the isolated
heavily damaged
point
and
icing
on
the
defects
zones in the hardening
properand the
mechanism.
Sindanyo showed
Single
crystals
of Johnson
maintained
the at
Above
250 pA/cm2. became both attributed
specimen
-195°C
DETAILS
up to this
Matthey
spectroscop-
accelerator
y0 = 2, = 40” was ensured
current
the
could
be
density
of
temperature and this was
All irradiations were therefore Since the
delivers a reproducible
copper calorimeter
standard
a beam
made with a beam current of 150 pA/cm2.
split
A
by
measurements
temperature
high and very unsteady
immediately
moulds.
prevented
to the failure of the liquid nitrogen to wet
ically pure copper, 1.7 mm in diameter, were grown in an argon atmosphere by the Bridgman technique using graphite
was
ring (Fig. 1). Thermocouple that
the specimen properly. EXPERIMENTAL
window
enclosing the space between the slit and the box in a
ties might reflect this difference and hence indicate the part
box, the beam was restricted by a wat,er cooled copper
orientation
of
by seeding to eliminate
density
was
measured after
was substituted
by
beam the current
a
calorimetric
method
a specimen
irradiation.
A thin
containing
a known mass of water
for the specimen and the temperature
the variation in tensile properties with crystal orienta-
rise measured after a short irradiation.
tion.
Tensile tests were carried out in a conventional hardbeam machine in which specimens could be irradiated
Specimens
with a gauge length
of 1 cm were
prepared by cutting the crystals into 2 in. lengths by warm dilute nitric acid and soldering loops to the ends to provide grips for tensile testing. the specimens were electropolished acid and the dimensions The irradiations
accurately
After preparation
an intermediate
rise in
in orthophosphoric EXPERIMENTAL
measured.
were carried out in the beam of a
4 MeV Metropolitan-Vickers linear accelerator. The diameter of the beam was ~11 mm and the penetration of a 4 MeV electron in copper is ~2
mm so that
the whole gauge length of the specimen was irradiated. The maximum energy density in the beam was quite high (1200 W/cm2) and considerable attention was devoted to securing adequate cooling of the specimens. In a beam of 300 PA/cm2 the heat generated in a specimen was ~225 W and calculations showed that cooling by a gas or by conduction and through a grip was completely
and tested at - 195°C without temperature.
along the specimen Direct inadequate.
RESULTS
Typical stress-strain curves showing the effect of electron irradiation at -195°C on the mechanical properties of copper single crystals are shown in Fig. 2, Following
irradiation
- 195°C without
the
crystals
intermediate
were
tested
at,
rise in temperature.
The effect of the irradiation was to increase the critical shear stress and generally to displace the stress-strain curve to higher stress levels. No yield point was introduced and the slope and magnitude of the “easy glide” region was unaltered. Similar results were obtained during tests at -195’C on crystals irradiated at 20°C.
MAKIN
AND
BLEWITT:
HARDENING
BY
ELECTRON
IRRADIATION
243
Accelerator
Liquid Nitrogen Inlet
I inch
FIG. 1. The target dose used for irradiating at - 195%.
The critical shear stress at -195°C has been determined as a function of dose during irradiations at -195, -78 and 20°C (Fig. 3). In all cases the specimens were stored at -195°C immediately after irradiation and specimens irradiated at low temperatures were not allowed to warm-up before testing. The critical shear-stress-dose curve is very sensitive to the irradiation temperature except at low doses. During i~adiation at - 195°C the critical shear stress continues to increase with electron dose, although at a decreasing rate, until after a dose of 100 ,uA/hr cm2 a critical shear stress of 1 kg/mm2 is reached, starting from the unirradiated value of 80 g/mm2. Irradiation at 2O*C,however, produces rapid hardening initially at the same rate as at -195°C up to a dose of 8 pA/hr cm2 after which the rate of hardening diminishes rapidly, the critical shear stress saturating at 500 g/mm-2 after 40 pA1h.r cm-2, remaining constant thereafter up to doses as high as 200 pA/hr cm-2. Irradiations at -78°C and -20°C produces curves intermediate between the 20°C and -195% results. Due to the difficulty of irradiating specimens at -20°C for long periods it was not possible to ascertain whether a true saturation occurred at this temperature. To determine whether the great difference in the hardening obtained during irradiation at - 195’C and 20% was due to irradiating on either side of a large recovery stage specimens were irradiated for 80 pA/hr cmm2at -195°C and were then annealed at 20°C for
several hours before testing at -- 195°C. This annealing decreased the critical shear stress by only 10 per cent (Fig. 4), i.e. from ~9OOg/mma to ~800 g/mm2, in comparison to the value of 500 gimm2 observed after irradiation at 20°C. Annealing for increased times at 20°C produced no further decrease. The results obtained at -78 and -20°C also suggest that the effect is not due to irradiating on either side of a recovery stage but is a ~ont~uous function of temperature. Annealing experiments to ascertain the temperature range in which recovery of the irradiation induced hardening occurred were carried out on a batch of
0’
5
IO
15
20
25
GLIDE, % Pm. 2. Stress-strain curves of electronirradiated copper
single crystals of identical orientation. y. = lo = 4V.
244
.4CTA
1
20
METALLURGICA,
10,
1962
I
/
100
80
60
40 ELECTRON
FIQ. 3.
VOL.
hr cme2
DOSE,
The critical shear stress of copper single crystals as & function of eleotron dose at various temperatures.
specimens
irradiated
for
31 pA1h.r cm-2
at
20°C.
The critical shear stress of these specimens at - 195% was
490 g/mm2, almost at the saturation value. Each specimen was annealed for 30 min at a particular temperature way.
and then tested at -195%
in the usual
The results shown in Fig. 5 reveal that recovery
commences
at
temperatures
increases
steadily
Recovery
was not
30 min at 420°C.
with
as low
as 80%
increasing
complete,
however,
No particular
and
temperature.
annealing
even
after
stages are
recognisable.
ELECTRON
In view
MICROSCOPE
of the direct
OBSERVATIONS
observation
of damage
in
copper after neutron(4y5) and alpha particle(6) irradiation by thin film transmission attempt
was made to observe
electron irradiation.
electron microscopy, the defects
an
following
Annealed copper foils, 0.0005 and
0.002 in. thick, were irradiated at 20°C for doses up to 1500 pA/hr cm-2 and at -195°C for doses up to 200 ,uA/hr cm- 2. Electropolishing was carried out in an orthophosphoric acid-water bath at 20°C and the
GLIDE, ‘lo FIG. 4. The decrease in flow stress which occurs annealing at 20°C crystals irradirtted at -195’C.
on
specimen examined in a Siemens Elmiskop I microscope. No defects attributable to the electron irradiation were observed. A further experiment was carried out in which defects were introduced by other methods, such as neutron irradiation or quenching, and then observing whether these defects were altered by subsequent electron irradiation (1500 PAlhr cm-2) at 20°C.
MAKIN
AND
BLEWITT:
HARDENIXG
No significant effect of the irradiation was observed in either case. DISCUSSION
Bombarding electrons lose energy in a solid by electrostatic collision with both the electrons and the nuclei in the material and because of the much greater equality in the masses, most of the energy is lost in electron-electron collisions. In a metal these produce, however, no permanent damage, only electron-nucleus collisions result in dispIaced atoms. The cross-section for such a collision, in which more than 25 eV is transferred to the copper atom, is quite large and has been calculated(7) to be ~30 barns for a I-MeV electron increasing to ~75 barns for a 4-MeV electron. The maximum energy transferred is then 68 and 272 eV and the mean energy 44 and 66 eV respectively. Hence, the knocked-on atoms can themselves produce o&y a very small number of further dispIacements. The total damage rate is nevertheless quite rapid. For example, taking average values, the concentration of defects produced in a copper single crystal 1.7 mm diameter will be ~3.4 x 1O-6 per pA/hr cm-2. In neutron irradiation of a hollow uranium cylinder in the BEPO reactor at Harwell, where the fast &IX is 4 x 1O1rneutrons/cm2 see-l, the concentration of displacements produced per week should be 18 x lo-“, assuming a collision cross-section of 3 X 1O-24cm2 and thirty defect pairs per primary knock-on. Hence, an irradiation of 5.3 ,uA/hr cm-2 is equivalent to 1 week in the reactor and with the accelerator at full beam power the specimen can be given this dose in
BY
ELECTRON
IRRADIATION
only 2.55 min. The damage rate is therefore very rapid compared with neutron irradiation. The damage differs from that produced by reactor neutron irradiation, however, in that it consists of very widely dispersed pairs of interstitial atoms and vacancies instea.d of heavily clustered groups of defects. This difference in the spatial distribution of the damage after electron and neutron irradiations has a very profound effect on the radiation hardening and this is apparent both in the ma,gnitude and the nature of the hardening. Perhaps the most striking difference is in the sensitivity of electron hardening to the irradiation temperature. This does not occur during neutron irradiation, where the two hardening curves obtained at -195°C and 20°C differ by only the ~10O/~ recovery which occurs at about 0°CY8). This latter recovery effect, incidentally, is one of the very few points of similarity between the two types of hardening. The high temperature recovery of the hardening is very different after electron and neutron irradiation.@) Instead of the steady decrease in critical shear stress with annealing temperature observed after electron irradiation, Fig. 5, recovery after neutron irradiation occurs in a fairly well defined stage beginning (for a 30-min anneal) at about 300°C and extending up to ~380°C. No recovery is observed at temperatu~s as low as 100°C. EIectron hardening is much closer in magnitude to quench hardeningus~rlJbut there are very important differences, particularly in the annealing behaviour. Quenched gold recovers between 500 and 700% and @=3fp
-I -a
A. hr. cm
Anneding Tim@ 3Omin Testing Tempemture - I~S”C.
aim loo
Annealing
245
400 Temperature, “C
Fta. 5. The deeream in critic& shear stress on annealing of crystals irradiated at 20°C.
ACTA
246
METALLURGICA,
annealing for as long as 6 hours at 250°C produced detectable
softening,
behaviour
in
marked
of electron irradiated
duced tion
by electron
dislocations
obstacles
unequivocably
from pro-
is due to the forma-
resisting
suggests that most probably obstacles.
very small, as they
the motion
of
the hardening
is due to
that
the
type
at different
neutron
and
hence
there
must
of irradiation
suggests
collision
nucleation mutual
during
that
this process
nucleation
point
of intermingled irradiation
will
occur
in the hardening.
will
defects.
ture at which recovery
between - 195°C and 2073, and, thirdly,
These differences the difference the
leading
to
early of the
by the low tempera-
commences.
this hardening The
complete electron
hypothesis
absence
associated
irradiation.
that the “zones”
and principally
for the majority
mental evidence for this hypothesis by comparing
spikes
This supports the formed in the displace-
hardening produced by neutron irradiation.c3) obtained
with
of the damage pro-
of displacement
ment spikes are responsible
of the Experi-
has recently been
the mechanical
properties
of
neutron irradiated copper with the defects observed by thin film electron microscopy.(5) due
interstitial-vacancy produced
to
the
The hardening pro-
is therefore the type of
introduction
of
pairs and is different
by either zones or quenched
isolated from that
in vacancies.
principal
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge assistance
and that
due to
differences
are,
the valuable
given by the operating staff of the electron
tory.
The main feature of this work has been to determine
between
stages.
are undoubtedly
in the distribution
linear accelerator
in
some of the basic characteristics of hardening due to electron irradiation and to demonstrate the great irradiation.
on the irradiation
and the absence of discrete recovery
result
CONCLUSIONS
difference
the great
temperature
vacancies
The instability
resulting damage is demonstrated
neutron
secondly,
the very low temperature at which recovery commences
may
of clusters
on a very fine scale and a large amount of
recombination
saturation
defects,
after
produce the same
hardening
hardening
of the
electron
upon the tempera-
of migrating
The high rate of formation interstitials
of point
be some
other
the
of electron
duced by electron irradiation
The early saturation
depend upon the homogeneous
and
concentration
these zones are
clusters of point defects that can
give rise to hardening.
by the random
with
for the hardening.
however,
effect at 20°C and the dependence ture
the damage identical
and this is so if the zones pos-
During electron irradiation, process of forming
of
temperatures.
irradiation
tulated by Seegerc3) are responsible formed
or amount
must be virtually
that formed at 20°C
not
of
with
be seen in the electron
of the hardening on the irradiation
during
magnitude
with that due to neutrons
duced by the two types of irradiation
implies
at -195°C
small
cannot
stored is different
Conversely, formed
very
compared
dependence
during
The dependence damage
the
hardening
1962
If this is so then these must be
microscope. temperature
firstly,
10,
irradiation doses which theoretically
or to the difficulty of initiating dislocation The absence of yield points, however,
movement. dispersed
the
whether the hardening
irradiation
of dispersed
no
to
copper.
It is not possible to determine the present experiments
contrast
VOL.
at the Wantage
Research
Labora-
REFERENCES 1. C. E. DIXON and C. J. MEECHAN, P&s. Rev. 91,237 (1953). 2. H. DIECIUMP, NAA-SR-1452 (1955). 3. A. SEEGER, PTOC. 2nd Int. Conf. Peaceful Uses Atomic Energy, Geneva 6, 250 (1958). 4. J. SILCOX end P. B. HIRSCH, Phil. hfag. 4, 1356 (1959). 5. M. J. MAIUN, A. D. WHAPHAM and F. J. MINTER, Phil. Mag. 6, 465 (1961). 6. R. S. BARNES and D. J. MAZEY, Phil. Mag. 5,1247 (1960). 7. R. S. PEASE and G. H. KINCHIN, Rep. Progr. Phys. 18, 1 (1955). 8. M. J. MAKIN, Acta. Met. 6, 305 (1958). 9. T. H. BLEWITT, R. R. COLTMAN,R. E. JAMISONand J. K. REDMAN, J. Nucl. Mat. 2, 277 (1960). 10. H. KIMURA, R. MADDIN and D. KUHLMAN-WILSDORF, Acta. Met. 7, 154 (1959). 11. M. MESHII and J. W. KAUFFMAN, A&c. Met. 7, 180 (1959).