The Influence of Preoperative Anemia on Clinical Outcomes After Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery

The Influence of Preoperative Anemia on Clinical Outcomes After Infrainguinal Bypass Surgery

Journal Pre-proof The influence of pre-operative anaemia on clinical outcomes following infra-inguinal bypass surgery S. Nandhra, L. Boylan, J. Prenti...

1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 70 Views

Journal Pre-proof The influence of pre-operative anaemia on clinical outcomes following infra-inguinal bypass surgery S. Nandhra, L. Boylan, J. Prentis, C. Nesbitt, the Northern Vascular Centre PII:

S0890-5096(19)31042-8

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.043

Reference:

AVSG 4811

To appear in:

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Received Date: 4 October 2019 Revised Date:

22 November 2019

Accepted Date: 25 November 2019

Please cite this article as: Nandhra S, Boylan L, Prentis J, Nesbitt C, the Northern Vascular Centre, The influence of pre-operative anaemia on clinical outcomes following infra-inguinal bypass surgery, Annals of Vascular Surgery (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.043. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Crown Copyright © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1 2 3

The influence of pre-operative anaemia on clinical outcomes following infra-inguinal bypass surgery Nandhra.S1,2, Boylan. L1, Prentis.J3, Nesbitt.C1 and the Northern Vascular Centre

4 5

Author Affiliations

6

1

7

Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE77DN

8

2

9

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX UK

Northern Vascular Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman

Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark, Richardson Road,

10

3

11

Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN UK.

Department of Anaesthesia, the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust,

12 13 14 15

Corresponding Author:

16

Sandip Nandhra; [email protected]

17

Northern Vascular Centre

18

Freeman Hospital

19 20

Declarations:

21

None to be declared

22 23 24

Word Count – body 3066

25

With references - 4256

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

1

Abstract

35 36 37

Introduction

38

Within chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) the effect of anaemia is becoming

39

apparent. This study aimed to further understand the influence of anaemia in patients

40

undergoing surgical revascularisation for lower-limb ischaemia.

Anaemia is associated with a greater mortality and complications in cardiovascular surgery.

41 42

Methods

43

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing infra-inguinal surgical revascularisation

44

between 2016 and 2018 at a tertiary centre was performed. Anaemia was defined as a

45

haemoglobin (Hb) of less than 120g/L. Primary outcome was overall survival by Kaplan-

46

Meier analysis. Secondary outcomes included, length of hospital stay, blood-transfusion

47

requirements, wound infection, myocardial infarction, limb-loss and all-cause mortality. Cox-

48

proportional hazard analysis and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) were performed.

49 50

Results

51

124 patients were followed up for a mean of 23(8) months. 45 patients were anaemic. There

52

were comparable baseline demographics, comorbidity and severity of symptoms. Overall

53

survival was significantly worse (Log rank p<0.01) in the anaemic group as was the duration

54

of stay; 27(23) days vs. 14(16) days (P=0.001). Anaemic patients received more blood

55

transfusions; 19 (42%) compared to 13 (16.5%) (p=0.001) and had more cardiac

56

complications (11.1% vs 3.8%) (P=0.02). Surgical Site infection rates were also higher (20%

57

vs. 6.3% P=0.036). There was no difference in graft patency or subsequent ipsilateral major

58

lower extremity amputation. 30-day mortality was comparable between the anaemic versus

59

the non-anaemic; 3 (6.7%) vs. 1 (1.3%) (P=0.132). At 1-year there was a greater mortality in

60

the anaemic group of 8 (18%) vs. 4 (5%) in the non-anaemic group (P=0.037) which persisted

61

into the long-term.

62

Anaemia was independently associated with mortality; Hazard Ratio 4.0 (1.14-12.1). A ‘cut-

63

off’ Hb of 112g/L was identified by ROC analysis.

64 65

Conclusion

66

2

67

Pre-operative anaemia in infra-inguinal bypass surgery has a significant association with

68

mortality and morbidity. Pre-operative anaemia should prompt the vascular team to

69

consider these patients as higher risk and consider optimisation of haemoglobin.

70 71 72

Introduction

73

Anaemia, defined by the world health organisation as a circulating haemoglobin (Hb)

74

concentration below 130g/l for men and 120g/l for women [1], is a disease of multifactorial

75

aetiologies but present in a third of patients undergoing surgery [1].

76

There is existing evidence that anaemic patients undergoing elective surgery or intervention

77

are at an increased risk of mortality at 30 days [2] and the effect is most notable In patients

78

undergoing cardiac surgery where pre-operative anaemia is associated with an increased

79

risk of death [2] along with longer inpatient hospital stay and a three times greater

80

likelihood of requiring a red blood cell transfusion compared to non-anaemic patients [3].

81

Within vascular surgery there is some evidence that suggests increasing age and cardiac co-

82

morbidities, which are common in patients having vascular procedures and in the presence

83

of anaemia may be associated with even greater mortality and post-operative morbidity[4-

84

6] but these studies predate significant recommendations by NICE (National Institute for

85

Clinical and Healthcare Excellence, UK) in 2016 [7]. Following this guidance there has also

86

been the increased recognition that a patient blood management (PBM) pathway is

87

important. PBM is a three-pillar WHO endorsed process (WHA63.12). The first pillar of PBM

88

is to manage pre-operative anaemia in surgical patients. The implementation of PBM

89

strategies have shown benefits in-terms of outcome and reduction in cost[8] but not all

90

healthcare settings have been able to apply PBM strategies due to a number of challenges

91

that have been reported to limit implementation before surgery[9, 10]. Whilst the

92

recognition of anaemia and poor outcome is not a new concept there has been little

93

evidence change in practice within vascular surgery. none-the-less the importance of

94

improving outcomes among peripheral arterial patients remains a key priority. In 2017 a UK

95

Delphi consensus endorsed by the Vascular society of Great Britain and the Royal college of

96

Surgeons England identified that improving outcomes in chronic limb threatening ischaemia

97

(CLTI) are a top ten research priority within the vascular community, furthermore the

98

publication of the global guidance on the management of Chronic Limb-threatening

99

Ischaemia[11] have confirmed its priority within world-wide vascular surgery. One area for

100

improvement is perhaps the recognition of anaemia because this has been proposed to be

101

associated with a higher incidence of major amputation in patients admitted with critical

3

102

limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) [12], equally pre-operative Red Blood Cell (RBC)

103

transfusion optimisation strategies have been shown to be not without risk; being

104

associated with poorer outcomes, including wound infection and death [1] amid the risk of a

105

transfusion related systemic reaction. Pre-optimisation with intravenous and oral iron

106

replacements have been proven to be effective in patients undergoing colorectal and

107

orthopaedic procedures [1, 13] but the specific evidence in vascular surgery is limited.

108

The aim of this cohort study is to assess the relationship between pre-operative anaemia

109

and post-operative outcomes, particularly since the advent of the NICE guidelines and the

110

recommendation of PBM practice, in those patients undergoing urgent surgical lower-limb

111

revascularisation.

112 113

Methods

114

Study design

115

A prospectively maintained database of all vascular procedures at the Northern Vascular

116

Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle (a UK tertiary centre) was retrospectively reviewed.

117

Any missing data were queried by the investigators retrospectively. All patients undergoing

118

primary infra-inguinal bypass surgery for Rutherford classification of 3 and above (severe

119

quality of life (QoL) limiting short distance claudication and/or CLTI) between December

120

2016 and December 2018 were included. Patients undergoing surgery for peripheral

121

aneurysmal disease or acute limb ischaemia were excluded.

122 123

Study population

124

Anaemia was defined as a Haemoglobin (Hb) of less than 120 g/L, this adopts the lower limit

125

of the WHO guidelines for men and women [1]. Baseline characteristics were collected,

126

including demographics, indication for surgery (Rutherford Classification)[14], co-

127

morbidities, statin and anti-platelet medication and pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb),

128

sodium, creatinine and eGFR. All patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate based

129

on the CKD-EPI formula [15] within 4 weeks prior to surgery.

130

Comorbidities were defined as per SVS guideline where possible[16]; diabetes was defined

131

by documented medical history, the use of oral antidiabetic agents or insulin or fasting

132

plasma glucose levels of at least 1.26 g/L; hypertension was defined by documented medical

133

history and use of antihypertensive drugs for this purpose, or systolic blood pressure (SBP)

134

of at least 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of at least 90 mmHg at admission

4

135

determined by the average of the first two measurements. The following diseases were

136

noted, according to the documented medical history: Ischaemic heart disease, heart failure,

137

cerebrovascular disease (stroke; including ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke as well as

138

transient ischemic attack), end-stage renal failure requiring dialysis and a documented

139

diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pre-operative statin and anti-

140

platelet use was recorded in the pre-assessment clinic. Duration of bypass revascularisation

141

surgery was recorded as were the conduits used.

142

Follow-up

143

Information regarding patient follow-up visits was entered prospectively into the

144

Departmental database. Follow-up for patients undergoing bypass of the peripheries in the

145

department consists of a 6 week out-patient clinical assessment, 3-month graft ultrasound

146

(DUS) surveillance and follow-up in the clinic thereafter at suitable intervals based upon

147

wound healing or symptom status. All other data was collected by review of electronic

148

records.

149

Patients were followed up using online electronic patient records and review of paper

150

records. Electronic general practice records were also reviewed in case of missing

151

information by the study team retrospectively.

152 153

Ethics

154

The study was approved by the Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Hospital research department and the

155

Newcastle University review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all

156

participating subjects according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

157

Outcomes

158

The primary outcome of interest is all-cause mortality at the end of follow-up.

159

Secondary outcomes included the all-cause mortality for CLTI only patients, length of

160

hospital stay, number of myocardial events within 30 days, post-operative red blood cell

161

transfusion, surgical site infection, renal function, Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) detected graft

162

patency, overall re-intervention rates, limb-loss and interval mortality (30 days and 1 year).

163

Complications were recorded as per SVS/AHA guidelines where possible[16]. Length of stay

164

was defined as the duration (in days) spent in the tertiary arterial centre until discharge

165

home or to a ‘step-down’ rehabilitation hospital. Surgical site infection was determined by

5

166

the presence of cellulitis, erythema requiring antibiotics and as part of a clinical diagnosis by

167

a member of the vascular surgical team within 30 days of surgery.

168

Follow-up renal function was recorded as eGFR. Overall re-intervention rate was defined as

169

the absolute number of patients who underwent either an endovascular (angioplasty) or

170

open surgical procedure (revision and/or redo) during the follow-up period. Limb-loss is

171

defined as any ipsilateral major lower limb amputation following the bypass surgery within

172

the follow-up period (above or below knee).

173 174

Statistical analysis

175

Data were recorded in a dedicated database. Normally distributed data are presented as

176

mean (SD), and hypothesis testing performed with paired and unpaired t-tests. Non-

177

normally distributed data are presented as median (IQR) values with analysis using Mann-

178

Whitney U test for unrelated samples and Wilcoxon signed rank test (WSR) for paired data.

179

Categorical data were analysed by means of chi squared (χ2) or, if necessary, Fisher’s exact

180

test. All data were collected during the dedicated clinic follow-up. Statistical analysis was

181

performed using SPSS version 24 (SPSS, IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA). A p value of <0.05 was

182

considered statistically significant for single comparisons. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were

183

used with log-rank test to compare the overall mortality. Cox regression model was used to

184

assess the survival according to the presence of anaemia. Regression analysis was

185

performed by a number of models. The first was to understand the impact of anaemia on

186

survival, the second was to take into account baseline demographics (age and gender), the

187

third was to understand the additional impact of co-morbidity and the fourth to appreciate

188

any influence of preventative medication and post-operative transfusion. Hazards ratios (HR)

189

with 95% confidence intervals (CI’s) are reported along with p-values. A HR of greater than 1

190

indicates a shorter time to death and a HR of less than 1 indicates a longer time-to-death.

191

Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify associations with complications and

192

multiple variates were tested. The resultant significant variables are presented as odds

193

ratios (OR) with 95% CI’s. An OR of greater than 1 indicates and increased likelihood of the

194

event occurring.

195 196

Results

197

Overall, 124 patients undergoing infra-inguinal bypass were included of which 45 were

198

found to be anaemic and all patients were followed-up for an overall mean (s.d) of 23(8)

199

months. Patients in each group had comparable baseline metrics for age, co-morbidity,

6

200

creatinine, antiplatelets, statins and Rutherford classification. There was a pre-ponderance

201

of females in the anaemia group; 13 (28.8%) vs 11 (13.9%) P=0.02. These are summarised in

202

Table 1.

203 204

The duration of surgery was equivalent between the two groups with the anaemic group

205

having a mean (s.d) operative duration of 256.7 (180) minutes versus the non-anaemic

206

group of 241.5 (153) minutes (P=0.781). There were equivalent vein and prosthetic bypass

207

conduits utilised.

208 209

Primary Outcome

210

Overall survival was worse in the anaemic patients and can be seen in the Kaplan-Meier plot

211

(P=0.017) (Figure 1). This shows a statistically significant difference in overall survival across

212

the follow-up period with those in the anaemic group fairing worse. Mean survival can be

213

found in Table 1.

214 215

Secondary Outcomes

216

Of the 124 patients studied, one-hundred and six were patients underwent a lower-limb

217

bypass for CLTI (Rutherford 4 or above). A Kaplan-Meier performed for this groups

218

demonstrated a significantly worse survival analysis for the 41 anaemic patients (Log rank

219

p=0.025).

220

Overall, the anaemic patients had a significantly greater mean duration of tertiary hospital

221

stay of 27(23) days compared to 14(16) days (P=0.001) with a significantly greater number of

222

patients who received a post-operative blood transfusion in the anaemic group with 19

223

(42%) compared to 13 (16.5%) (p=0.001). Although, the absolute number of units of blood

224

transfused were similar (see Table 3).

225

In terms of post-operative complications there was a significantly greater rate of 30-day

226

myocardial events in anaemic group (11.1% vs 3.8%) (P=0.02). Surgical site infection rates

227

were also higher in this group (20% vs. 6.3% P=0.036). There was no difference in graft

228

patency at three-month Duplex follow-up and there were comparable re-intervention rates

229

(see Table 2). There were similar rates of subsequent overall major lower limb amputation

230

with 14 undergoing amputation in the anaemic group and 17 in the non-anaemic group

231

(P=0.189), this remained non-significant when comparing the CLTI-only patients.

232

Renal function (eGFR) was comparable between each group at any time point within follow-

233

up (See Table 3).

7

234

Mortality at 30-days was comparable between the anaemic versus the non-anaemic; 3

235

(6.7%) vs. 1 (1.3%) respectively (P=0.132). At 1-year this had become significant with a

236

greater mortality in the anaemic patients of 8 (18%) compared to 4 (5%) in the non-anaemic

237

patients (P=0.037).

238 239

Regression analysis

240

Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed. Anaemia alone was a significantly

241

associated with a shorter time to death (HR 3.7 (1.1-12.3)) (p=0.034). Adjusting for

242

demographics continued to identify anaemia as the single significant variable. Further

243

adjustment for pre-operative co-morbidity again identified anaemia as the single significant

244

variable for an increased HR for death of 4.0 (1.14-12.1). The adjustment for medication and

245

transfusion high-lighted anti-platelet use as protective for death (see Table 5); transfusion of

246

RBC’s did not impact on survival.

247 248

For significant complications, multivariate binary regression analysis was performed. This

249

identified that anaemic patients had greater likelihood of MI with an OR of 9 (1.02 - 80)

250

P=0.048 and similarly a greater likelihood of wound infection (OR of 4.3 (1.2 – 15.6)

251

P=0.028); these were independent of demographics or pre-operative comorbidity and

252

medications.

253

In terms of requirement for post-operative RBC transfusion there was an increased

254

likelihood of transfusion amongst the anaemic patients with an OR of 4 (1.7 – 9.4) P=0.001.

255

When controlling for co-morbidity and medication, anaemia made the likelihood of

256

transfusion greater (OR 7 (2.3 – 21.4) P=0.001) but a pre-operative diagnosis of renal failure

257

was a significant associated variable (p=0.047).

258 259

Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve

260

A ROC analysis enabled identification of a ‘cut-off’ Hb for the primary outcome of overall

261

mortality. This demonstrated that a Hb of 112g/L was the most sensitive (66.7%) and specific

262

(79.5%) for mortality following bypass surgery (Area under the curve (AUC) 0.749, (see

263

Figure 2).

264

Similar analysis identified a cut-off Hb of below 122g/L for the requirement of a post -

265

operative transfusion (75% Sensitivity, 66.3% specificity, AUC 0.737) and the risk of a post-

266

operative MI (sensitivity 63% and specificity of 86%, AUC 0.683).

267 268 8

269 270

Discussion

271

This study demonstrates that patients with anaemia have a greater overall mortality

272

following infra-inguinal bypass surgery. Anaemia is also independently associated with death

273

irrespective of pre-operative co-morbidity and as such anaemic patients have a shorter

274

expected survival (HR 4.0 (1.14-12.1) than non-anaemic patient.

275

Additionally, anaemic patients spent on average 13 days longer in hospital (27 vs.14 days

276

(P=0.001)), more frequently received a post-operative blood transfusion (42.2% vs. 16.5%)

277

(OR of 4 (1.7 – 9.4) P=0.001) and experienced more post-operative complications; with a

278

higher rate 30-day myocardial events (11.1% vs 3.8%) (P=0.02) and surgical site infection

279

(20% vs. 6.3% P=0.036) (OR of 4.3 (1.2 – 15.6) P=0.028). This was irrespective of bypass

280

conduit or baseline comorbidity. These associations highlighted are stark and aligns with

281

other findings within the current literature. A large cohort study (5081patients) by Bodewes

282

et. al [17] compared the 30-day outcomes for a similar group of bypass patients using (USA)

283

registry data between 2011 and 2014. They identified that there was an increased mortality

284

rate with increasing severity of anaemia (severe, 3.1%; moderate, 3.0%; mild, 1.8%; no

285

anaemia: 0.7%; all P < .01) whilst there was a trend towards greater mortality at 30-days

286

within our data this did not reach significance (p=0.106). Furthermore, direct comparison by

287

stratification of anaemia was not performed due to the small sample size within the present

288

study. A French study of 925 patients using registry data from 2004 through to 2010 found

289

similar outcomes for anaemic patients with a greater HR for death and amputation[18] and

290

that amputation was associated with a lower haemoglobin (HR 1.20(1.07 – 1.36) irrespective

291

of comorbidity. Our study data did not find this relationship, but this may be a reflection of

292

a smaller sample size but also the thresholds for anaemia were much lower in the Desomais

293

group paper. Interestingly both Bodewes and Desomais found there to be a significant

294

difference in the baseline demographics with the anaemic patients tending to be older and

295

more co-morbid. The population within our study was comparable without difference in age

296

or comorbidity. This could be related to sample size but all of these studies will suffer from

297

the limitations of an observational study.

298

Interestingly our patients were average aged between 65.8 and 67.2 whish is lower than the

299

anaemic groups for both existing large cohort studies (70 and 73.7 respectively) and could

300

well reflect a different demographic within the UK population that highlight some

301

uniqueness when applying this data to other populations.

9

302

Surgical site infection rates were higher in our anaemic patients and but overall the

303

Bodewes group did not detect a similar difference; our records recorded only the presence

304

of infection based upon clinical assessment which may be subject to bias.

305

Within our sample a cut-off haemoglobin of 112g/L (see Error! Reference source not found.)

306

was identified, and is reasonably comparable to Spanish study for both endovascular and

307

open surgery of 100g/L for patients with CLTI[19].

308

Combining the ROC ‘cut-off’ for MI with that for mortality; may indicate that a target pre-

309

operative haemoglobin level between 112 and 122g/L to reduce the likelihood of adverse

310

outcome. This is a useful however for planning a prospective trial into targets for

311

optimisation. A randomised study comparing high (9.7g/L) to low (<8g/L) intra-operative

312

triggers for red blood cell transfusion in vascular surgery, powered to detect change in post-

313

operative Hb found that the lower <8.0g/L Hb trigger was associated with a higher rate of

314

death or major vascular complication (hazard ratio, 3.20; P=0.006) and fewer days alive

315

outside hospital within 90 days (median [IQR], 76 [67-82] vs. 82 [76-84] days; P=0.049) [20],

316

evidencing association of anaemia with poor outcome but also suggesting a Hb of 97 is

317

perhaps acceptable.

318

There are clearly limitations within this study. It is a small cohort from a single tertiary

319

centre which could limit broader generalisability to the wider population with the sample

320

size may limiting our ability to detect differences in amputation rates. Certainly, the nature

321

of an observational study means that control and matching of potential confounders is

322

challenging and the probability of bias remains high whilst multivariate analysis was used to

323

adjust for the impact of individual variables it is acknowledged that this is not a fail-proof

324

process and potentially reduces the impact of any identified associations.

325

The absolute cause of anaemia has not been evaluated which may present confounding

326

issues such as occult malignancy or other missed diagnosis such as heart or renal failure

327

which could influence prognosis within the anaemic patients[21].

328

The overall outcomes of medium to long term poor survival in the presence of anaemia are

329

congruent with other similar duration vascular studies[19]. Equally, our findings corroborate

330

findings from outside the UK in terms of shorter-term outcomes and the negative

331

association with anaemia. It is clear that anaemia plays a role in elective cardiac and vascular

332

surgery with finding a higher rate of mortality and cardiac events over 5 years[22]

333

irrespective of comorbidity among anaemic patients. Similarly, anaemia leads to greater

334

likelihood of myocardial events following vascular surgery in the Netherlands[23].

10

335

In terms of longer-term outcomes following revascularisation this study demonstrates a

336

negative implication on long-term survival but once again this as yet only an association.

337

There are existing causative mechanisms that may explain why anaemia results in death,

338

such as changes in cardiac physiology [21] leading to dysfunctional

339

hypertrophy (LVH), a risk-factor for myocardial infraction and all-cause mortality[24, 25].

340

However, association does not necessarily equate to causation and prospective work is now

341

required to further investigate this question. This paper has demonstrated that anaemia

342

must be carefully considered prior to surgical intervention as appears to be a poor

343

prognostic marker. It may help with planning care in the post-operative environment. Given

344

that the duration of surgery for both groups of patients was approximately 4 hours it could

345

perhaps guide treatment planning in terms of the appropriateness of open surgical

346

intervention. With the recent SVS/ESVS guidelines[11] in mind it seems that the pre-

347

optimisation of haemoglobin to improve survival following revascularisation is a relevant

348

avenue of future research.

349 350

Conclusion

351

This UK study highlights the prevalence and subsequent impact of pre-operative anaemia in

352

patients undergoing lower limb bypass surgery. Anaemia is associated with a greater

353

mortality and significantly greater rates of cardiac complication, wound infection, length of

354

hospital stay and post-operative blood transfusion. Low Haemoglobin levels as part of the

355

pre-operative work up should signal the potential for greater risks of morbidity and

356

mortality for urgent bypass patients.

357 358 359 360

Funding No funding sources to declare.

361 362

Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the vascular consultants; Miss

363

Anne Burdess, Mr Mike Clarke, Mr Tim Lees, Mr James McCaslin, Miss Lucy Wales and Mr

364

Mike Wyatt at the Northern Vascular Centre. In addition, offer special thanks to the research

365

nurses, Deborah Amis, Martin Catterson and Noala Parr.

left ventricular

366 367 368 369 370

1. Hogan M, Klein AA, Richards T. the impact of anaemia and intravenous iron replacement therapy on outcomes in caridac surgery. European Journal Of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2014; 1-9.

11

371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418

2. Fowler AJ, Ahmad T, Phull MK et al. Meta-analysis of the association between preoperative anaemia and mortality after surgery. British Journal Of Surgery 2015; 102. 3. Sanders J, Cooper JA, Farrar D et al. Pre-operative anaemia is associated with total morbidity burden on days 4 and 5 after cardiac surgery: a cohort study. Perioperative Medicine 2017; 6. 4. Horwich TB, Fonarow GC, Hamilton MA et al. Anemia is associated with worse symptoms, greater impairment in functional capacity and a significant increase in mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2002; 39: 1780-1786. 5. Szachniewicz J, Petruk-Kowalczyk J, Majda J et al. Anaemia is an independent predictor of poor outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology 2003; 90: 303-308. 6. Ezekowitz Justin A, McAlister Finlay A, Armstrong Paul W. Anemia Is Common in Heart Failure and Is Associated With Poor Outcomes. Circulation 2003; 107: 223-225. 7. National Clinical Guideline C. Blood transfusion (NG24). In. 2017. 8. Leahy MF, Hofmann A, Towler S et al. Improved outcomes and reduced costs associated with a health-system-wide patient blood management program: a retrospective observational study in four major adult tertiary-care hospitals. Transfusion 2017; 57: 1347-1358. 9. Munoz M, Gomez-Ramirez S, Kozek-Langeneker S et al. 'Fit to fly': overcoming barriers to preoperative haemoglobin optimization in surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 15-24. 10. Kotze A, Harris A, Baker C et al. British Committee for Standards in Haematology Guidelines on the Identification and Management of Pre-Operative Anaemia. Br J Haematol 2015; 171: 322-331. 11. Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P et al. Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019. 12. Desormais I, Aboyans V, Bura A et al. Anemia, an independant predictive factor for amputation and mortality in patients hospitalised for peripheral arterial disease. European Society For vascular Surgery 2014; 48. 13. Chau M, Richards T, Evans C et al. The UK cardiac and vascular surgery interventional anaemia response (CAVIAR) study: protocol for an observational cohort study to determine the impact and effect of pre-operative anaemia management in cardiac and vascular surgical patients. BMJ Open 2017; 7. 14. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 517-538. 15. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Annals of internal medicine 2009; 150: 604-612. 16. Al Falluji N, Lawrence-Nelson J, Kostis JB et al. Effect of anemia on 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 636-641. 17. Bodewes TCF, Pothof AB, Darling JD et al. Preoperative anemia associated with adverse outcomes after infrainguinal bypass surgery in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66: 1775-1785 e1772.

12

419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445

18. Desormais I, Aboyans V, Bura A et al. Anemia, an independent predictive factor for amputation and mortality in patients hospitalized for peripheral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48: 202-207. 19. Velescu A, Clará A, Cladellas M et al. Anemia Increases Mortality After Open or Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: A Retrospective Analysis. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2016; 51: 543-549. 20. Møller A, Nielsen HB, Wetterslev J et al. Low vs. high hemoglobin trigger for Transfusion in Vascular surgery (TV): a randomized clinical feasibility trial. Blood 2019; blood-2018-2010-877530. 21. McClellan WM, Flanders WD, Langston RD et al. Anemia and renal insufficiency are independent risk factors for death among patients with congestive heart failure admitted to community hospitals: a population-based study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1928-1936. 22. Dunkelgrun M, Hoeks SE, Welten GM et al. Anemia as an independent predictor of perioperative and long-term cardiovascular outcome in patients scheduled for elective vascular surgery. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 1196-1200. 23. Goei D, Flu WJ, Hoeks SE et al. The interrelationship between preoperative anemia and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: the effect on predicting postoperative cardiac outcome in vascular surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1403-1408. 24. Lipsic E, van der Horst IC, Voors AA et al. Hemoglobin levels and 30-day mortality in patients after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2005; 100: 289292. 25. Kannel WB. Lipids, diabetes, and coronary heart disease: insights from the Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1985; 110: 1100-1107.

446 447

13

Demographics Number AGE Gender Haemoglobin Rutherford Class. 3 – Claudication (modified) 4 - Rest Pain 5 - Tissue loss (digits) 6 - Extensive tissue loss Comorbidities and Medications Diabetes Hypertension IHD Heart Failure Renal Failure COPD Antiplatelets Statins Creatinine (Mean (s.d)) Sodium (mean (s.d)) Operative Data Duration in minutes (mean (s.d)) Conduit Vein Prosthetic

Non-Anaemic 79 (64%) 67.2(9.4) M68 F11 140.9 (14.8)

Anaemic 45 (36%) 65.8(11.2) M32 F13 105.5(9.5)

0.687 0.017 (<0.001)

14 (18%) 25 (32%) 9 (11%) 31 (39%)

4 (9%) 10 (22%) 6 (13%) 25 (56%)

0.118 0.139 0.918 0.214

23 (29.1%) 52 (65.8%) 23 (29.1%) 3 (4%) 3 (4%) 17 (21.5%) 54 (68.3%) 54 (68.3%) 86.4 (47.4) 137.6 (3.5)

18 (40%) 16 (35.6%) 33 (73.3%) 3 (6.7%) 2 (4.4%) 12 (26.7%) 29 (64.4%) 33 (73.3%) 89.4 (41.7) 137.2 (3.8)

0.193 0.699 0.364 0.297 0.550 0.514 0.241 0.875 0.272 0.591

241.5 (153) 69 (87.3%) 10 (12.7%)

256.7 (180) 39 (86.7%) 6 (13.3%)

0.781 0.701

Table 1 - Baseline demographics, co-morbidity and operative data

P Value

Group

Months (Mean (s.e)) 95% Confidence Interval

Non-anaemic

37.8 (1.4)

35.9 – 39.7

Anaemic

32.9 (2.1)

28.9 – 37.0

Overall

36.1(0.99)

34.2 – 38.1

Table 1-Mean survival in months

Non-Anaemic (79)

Anaemic (45)

P-Value

Myocardial Infarction

3 (3.8%)

5 (11.1%)

0.020

Wound infection

5 (6.3%)

9 (20%)

0.036

Graft Occlusion 3m

20 (25%)

16 (35.6%)

0.229

Re-intervention (endovas. or open)

32 (40.5%)

20 (44.4%)

0.495

Limb-loss

17 (21.5%)

14 (31.1%)

0.189

14 (16)

27 (23)

0.001

1 (1.3%)

3 (6.7%)

0.106

4 (5%)

8 (17.8%)

0.037

13 (16.5%)

19 (42.2%)

0.001

2 (2-3)

2 (1-3)

0.324

Complications

Length of Stay

Mortality 30d Mortality 1-year mort

Post -operative Red Blood Cell (RBC) transfusion Number of patients receiving RBC’s Median Quantity (IQR) (in units)

Table 1 – Complications, Length of Stay and Mortality, by Group

Renal Function (eGFR (ml/kg/min))

Non-Anaemic

Anaemic

Baseline

86.5 (28.2)

77.7 (26.6)

0.098

Day 1 Post-op

89.0 (31.6)

85.0 (34.9)

0.691

Week 1 Post-op

86.3 (31.2)

80.1 (30.8)

0.361

Year 1 Post-op

103.8 (43.2)

67.7 (25.0)

0.178

Table 1 – Renal function over time, by group

P-Value

1

Significant Variable

HR

95% CI

P-value

Anaemia1

3.7

1.1 – 12.3

0.034* 0.034*

Anaemia2

3.6

1.1 – 12.1

0.037* 0.037*

Anaemia3

4.0

1.14 – 12.1

0.031* 0.031*

Antiplatelet4

0.17

0.04 – 0.67

0.011* 0.011*

2

3

4

Anaemia, Anaemia, age, gender, +Comorbidities, +Medication and RBC transfusion (*significant p-value)

Table 1 - Cox Proportional Hazard table of significant variable by model of regression analysis

Non- anaemic Anaemic

Log rank, sig p=0.017

Months 0

6

12

18

24

30

36

Not anaemic

79

77

63

42

31

26

10

Anaemic

45

42

28

24

12

9

4

Figure 1 - Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis; (Non-Anaemic = Blue, Anaemic = Red,)

Non- anaemic Anaemic

Log rank, sig p=0.025

Months 0

6

12

18

24

30

36

Not anaemic

65

63

50

33

23

18

7

Anaemic

41

38

25

21

9

6

4

Figure 1 - Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis for sub-group of CLTI patients; (Non-Anaemic = Blue, Anaemic = Red)

ROC for mortality

Figure 1- ROC curve for mortality and Haemoglobin (AUC= 0.749)