Accepted Manuscript The initiation and development of a caldera-forming Plinian eruption (172ka Lower Pumice 2 eruption, Santorini, Greece)
J.M. Simmons, R.A.F. Cas, T.H. Druitt, R.J. Carey PII: DOI: Reference:
S0377-0273(16)30249-9 doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.05.034 VOLGEO 6119
To appear in:
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
12 August 2016 20 May 2017 30 May 2017
Please cite this article as: J.M. Simmons, R.A.F. Cas, T.H. Druitt, R.J. Carey , The initiation and development of a caldera-forming Plinian eruption (172ka Lower Pumice 2 eruption, Santorini, Greece), Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.05.034
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The initiation and development of a caldera-forming Plinian eruption (172 ka Lower Pumice 2 eruption, Santorini, Greece) J.M. Simmonsa, R.A.F Casa, b, T.H. Druittc, R.J. Careyb School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment (EAE), Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 3800 b School of Physical Sciences/CODES, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia c Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, IRD, OPGC, 6 Avenue Blaise Pascal, 63178 Clermont-Ferrand, France
a
PT
Keywords: Lower Pumice 2, Santorini, Precursor, Plinian, Caldera, Magma decompression
RI
ABSTRACT
SC
The rhyodacitic 172 ka Lower Pumice 2 (LP2) eruption terminated the first magmatic cycle at Santorini (Greece), producing a proximal <50 m thick succession of pyroclastic fall
NU
deposits, diffusely-stratified to massive ignimbrites and multiple lithic breccias. The eruption
MA
commenced with the development of a short-lived precursory eruption column, depositing a <15 cm blanket of 1-2 cm sized pumice fragments at near vent localities (LP2-A1). The precursor deposits are conformably overlain by a <30 m thick sequence of reversely-
D
graded/ungraded pumice fall deposits that reflect opening and widening of a point-source
PT E
vent, increasing mass discharge rates up to 108 kg s-1, and the development of a 36 km high eruption column (LP2-A2, A3).
The progressive increase in maximum vesicle number
CE
density (NVF) in rhyodacitic pumice, from 3.2 x 109 cm-3 in the basal fall unit of LP2-A2-1 to
AC
9.2 x 109 cm-3 in LP2-A3, translates to an increase in magma decompression rate from 18 to 29 MPa s-1 over the course of LP2-A. This is interpreted to be a consequence of progressive vent widening and a deepening of the fragmentation surface.
Such interpretations are
supported by the increase in lithic clast abundance vertically through LP2-A, and the occurrence of basement-derived (deep) lithic components in LP2-A3. The increasing lithic clast content and the inability to effectively entrain air into the eruption column, due to vent widening, resulted in column collapse and the development of pyroclastic density currents (PDCs; LP2-B). A major vent excavation event or the opening of new vents, possibly
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT associated with incipient caldera collapse, facilitated the ingress of water into the magmatic system, the development of widespread PDCs and the deposition of a <20 m thick massive phreatomagmatic tuff (LP2-C). The eruption cumulated in catastrophic caldera collapse, the enlargement of a pre-existing flooded caldera and the discharge of lithic-rich PDCs,
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
depositing proximal <9 m thick lithic lag breccias (LP2-D).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. INTRODUCTION The low recurrence times of caldera-forming explosive eruptions necessitate the need for modern appraisals of pre-historic Plinian eruption sequences and their source volcanoes. The stratigraphy of such volcanoes often document a prolonged history of explosive
PT
volcanism, associated with a range of explosive phenomena, including precursor, plume,
RI
ignimbrite and caldera-forming events (e.g., Froggatt, 1981; Walker, 1981a; Walker, 1981b;
SC
Houghton et al., 2003; Houghton et al., 2010; Houghton et al., 2014; Wilson et al., 1995; Chesner and Rose, 1991; Chesner et al., 1991; Chesner, 2012; De Silva et al., 2015; Simmons Santorini Volcano, in the Aegean Sea, Greece, is one such example,
NU
et al., 2016).
representing the product of twelve major explosive eruptions (with recurrence periods of 10-
MA
30 kyr) and five major caldera collapse events (Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt and Francaviglia, 1992; Druitt et al., 1999; Simmons et al., 2016; Simmons et al., 2017). Santorini is one of the
D
most intensively studied volcanoes on Earth, infamous for the VEI 6-7 Minoan eruption and
PT E
its part in the displacement of the Minoan society, from 1627 BCE (Bond and Sparks, 1976; Pichler and Friedrich, 1980; Heiken and McCoy Jr, 1984; Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt et al.,
CE
1999; Heiken and McCoy, 1990; Sparks and Wilson, 1990; Cioni et al., 2000; Pfeiffer, 2001; Sigurdsson et al., 2006; Druitt, 2014; date from Friedrich et al., 2006). The Minoan eruption
AC
was the largest and most recent Plinian explosive eruption of Santorini, terminating the second of two magmatic cycles. The earlier rhyodacitic 172 ka Lower Pumice 2 (LP2) eruption, thought to be of equivalent magnitude to the Minoan event, concluded the first magmatic cycle, forming one of the early calderas of Santorini. Despite these affinities, detailed research on the LP2 sequence is still in its infancy (e.g., Druitt et al. 1989; Druitt et al.,1999; Gertisser et al., 2009; Cadoux et al., 2014; Keller et al., 2014). Here, we use the stratigraphy of the LP2 deposit sequence, its components and their textures to reconstruct the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT eruption conditions, style of fragmentation (i.e., magmatic versus phreatomagmatic), dispersal and depositional processes, and the evolution of the vent system during one of the earliest recorded cataclysmic events of the Aegean region.
2. SANTORINI VOLCANO
PT
Santorini is one of five volcanic provinces that collectively define the Hellenic
RI
Volcanic Arc, resulting from the northward subduction of the African-Arabian plate beneath
SC
the Aegean microplate plate (McKenzie, 1970; Papazachos and Comninakis, 1971; Mercier et al., 1989; Jackson, 1994). The Santorini volcanic province consists of three volcanic fields,
NU
including Santorini caldera (e.g., Fouque, 1879; Nicholls, 1971; Bond and Sparks, 1976; Druitt et al., 1989; Perissoratis, 1995; Druitt et al., 1999), the Kolumbo Volcano to the NE
MA
(Druitt et al., 1999; Nomikou et al., 2012; Kilias et al., 2013; Nomikou et al., 2013; Cantner et al., 2014; Hübscher et al., 2015), and the Christiana Islands to the SW (Druitt et al., 1999;
D
Keller et al., 2010). The modern caldera of Santorini is bound by the islands of Thera,
PT E
Therasia and Aspronisi. The intra-caldera islands of Palea Kameni and Nea Kameni record the latest phase of volcanism at Santorini, which involved the growth of a lava flow and
CE
dome complex (Fig. 1A; Nicholls, 1971; Druitt et al., 1999; Pyle and Elliott, 2006). Santorini Volcano overlies continental crust of the Cycladic massif, which consists of
AC
non-exposed Proterozoic gneiss (Hercynian basement) and Mesozoic igneous and sedimentary assemblages.
These assemblages underwent high and medium pressure
metamorphism during the Eocene and Miocene, respectively (Alpine Orogeny; Nicholls, 1971; Makris, 1978; Andriessen et al., 1979; van der Maar and Jansen, 1983; Andriessen et al., 1987; Papanikolaou, 1987; Schliestedt et al., 1987; Liew and Hofmann, 1988; Urai et al., 1990; Skarpelis et al., 1992; Lips et al., 1999). Altered Triassic limestone and Eocene metapelites form exposures at Mt Profitis Ilias and Athinios, on Thera, the main island of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Santorini (Nicholls, 1971; Druitt et al., 1999). Granitoids have also been identified in drill cores near the town of Megalochori, on Thera (Skarpelis et al., 1992). Accessory limestone fragments, marbles, skarns, granitoids and other diverse metasedimentary lithic components preserved in the caldera wall deposits, provide additional insights into the diverse crustal assemblages of the Aegean.
PT
Early volcanism at Santorini was characterised by effusive to localised explosive
RI
activity on the Akrotiri Peninsula, producing basaltic to rhyodacitic submarine and subaerial
SC
lavas, hyaloclastite breccias and other pyroclastic deposits (650-550 ka Early Volcanic Centres of the Akrotiri Peninsula; Nicholls, 1971; Druitt et al., 1999). From 530 ka, a
NU
stratovolcano, named Peristeria, developed on the northern margin of the present-day caldera, producing a succession of basaltic-andesitic lavas.
This occurred concurrently with
MA
stombolian style eruptions on the Akrotiri Peninsula (e.g., Cape Balos, Cape Kokkinoperra, Cape Mavrorachida/Red Beach - 450-330 ka; Druitt et al., 1999). Twelve major explosive
D
eruptions and at least five major caldera collapse events have occur since 360 ka (Fig. 1A, B;
PT E
Heiken and McCoy Jr, 1984; Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt and Francaviglia, 1992; Druitt et al., 1999). The deposits from these eruptions define two mafic to silicic magmatic cycles that
CE
ended with the 172 ka Lower Pumice 2 and 3.6 ka Minoan eruptions, respectively (Fig. 1B;
2014).
AC
Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt et al., 1999; Gertisser et al., 2009; Cadoux et al., 2014; Keller et al.,
In historic times, volcanism has been restricted to Nea Kameni, characterised by effusive lava flows and vulcanian explosive activity. The last documented eruption occurred in 1950 (Druitt et al., 1999; Pyle and Elliott, 2006). From 2011 to 2012, the intrusion of > 1.4x107 m3 of magma beneath Santorini, resulted in inflation of the caldera floor and increased seismicity (Chouliaras et al., 2012; Newman et al., 2012; Kaviris et al., 2015;
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Papadimitriou et al., 2015; Parks et al., 2015). At the time of publication, seismicity is at baseline levels.
Figure 1. A. Distribution of the Thera Pyroclastics on Santorini (including the LP2 sequence; after Druitt et al., 1999). S1, S2, S3 etc. denotes the field locations (e.g., Site 1, Site 2, Site 3
PT
etc.) studied as the basis for this research (coordinates for each field location are provided in
RI
the supplementary material). B. Stratigraphy of the Thera Pyroclastics (after Druitt et al.,
SC
1999). Black bars denote periods of erosion between eruptions. Eruption dates from Druitt et al. (1999), Keller et al. (2000), Friedrich et al. (2006), Lee et al. (2013) and Fabbro et al.
METHODS
MA
3.
NU
(2013).
3.1. Facies and stratigraphic analysis
D
Stratigraphic analysis of the LP2 sequence was conducted at 13 localities inside the
PT E
caldera wall and at other selected extra-caldera exposures on the southern coast of the Akrotiri Peninsula (Fig. 1). This involved using the facies and terminology approach of Cas
CE
et al. (2009) to distinguish units based on lithological characteristics (e.g., componentry,
textures, geochemistry), depositional structures (e.g., diffuse bedding, ripples, dunes, cross
AC
bedding, laminations etc.) and fabrics (e.g., imbrication). Graphic logs recording grainsize, componentry, sorting, grading, clast angularity, bedforms, and contact relationships between successive lithofacies were constructed at each locality. The proportions of juvenile and lithic clast assemblages were determined by counting the number of clasts (>1 cm), of a specified component type, for a defined area of interest (typically 0.5-2 m2 depending on unit thickness).
Fallout dispersal patterns were assessed by recording the thicknesses of
individual fallout units at each field locality, then constructing isopach diagrams. In addition,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the average maximum diameters of the five largest juvenile and lithic clasts were measured at each locality, and isopleth diagrams were constructed for each fallout deposit.
The
thicknesses of ignimbrites and other associated deposits were also mapped, where accessible, to identify variations in unit geometry. Juvenile pyroclasts and volcanic ash were sampled at each major stratigraphic level at Cape Balos West (Site 4) and Fira (Site 9) to identify
PT
variations, or absence thereof, in texture, morphology, density and chemistry through the
RI
eruption sequence. Ash morphologies were imaged using a JEOL 7001F Scanning Electron
SC
Microscope (SEM) at the Monash Centre for Electron Microscopy (MCEM) to characterise the style of magma fragmentation (magmatic versus phreatomagmatic). The composition of
NU
juvenile pyroclasts (Table 1) was determined using the method detailed in Simmons et al. (2016). Lithic clasts were also sampled and characterised using petrographic analysis, to
D
over the course of the LP2 eruption.
MA
assess the temporal variations in fragmentation depth and the evolution of the vent system
PT E
3.2. Pyroclast density and vesicularity
The densities, total, connected and isolated vesicularities of juvenile pumice
CE
pyroclasts were measured at the Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans, in Clermont-Ferrand, France. Fifty to one hundred rhyodacitic white pumice pyroclasts (16–24 mm in diameter),
AC
selected from specified stratigraphic units of the LP2 sequence, were cleaned using distilled water and dried at 100°C for a period of 24 hours. Pumices which exceeded 24 mm in diameter were excluded from study, to minimise the effects of post-fragmentation vesiculation and thermal expansion (e.g., Thomas and Sparks, 1992). The fragments were first weighed using Metler Toledo DB602 electric scales (MP - sample mass). The volumes of pumice (VP) were then determined using glass beads (600-800 µm), as per the method of Silva (2008), which is detailed in Simmons et al. (2017). These parameters define pyroclast
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT density (kg m-3). To determine the mean solids density (DSOL - in kg m-3), selected pyroclasts were crushed using a Rocklabs tungsten carbide mill and weighed. The solids volume was then determined using an AccuPyc II 1340 He-Pycnometer. Total vesicularity was then
Equation 1.
RI
Total Vesicularity (VeT) = 1 – (MP / (DSOL x VP))
PT
determined using the following equation:
Connected (VeC) and isolated (VeI) vesicularities were subsequently
MA
determined as per the following equations:
NU
pycnometery.
SC
The combined glass and isolated vesicle volumes (VC) were also determined using helium
Equation 2.
D
Connected Vesicularity (VeC) = 1 – (VC / VP)
PT E
Isolated Vesicularity (VeI) = VeT – VeC
CE
Equation 3.
3.3. Analysis of vesicles textures
AC
Vesicle textures in pumice were imaged using a JEOL 7001F Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at Monash University’s Centre for Electron Microscopy (MCEM). Samples from each stratigraphic level and selected density classes (low, modal and high) were impregnated in epoxy and polished at Monash University’s petrographic facility. Vesicle textures were then imaged at four different magnifications (section scan, x25, x100, x500 on our JEOL 7001F SEM) to capture each vesicle size class, as per the method of Shea et al. (2010). These images were processed using the Matlab program, FOAMS (Shea et al.,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2010), which uses the stereological conversion technique of Sahagian and Proussevitch (1998) to quantify vesicle volume distributions and vesicle number densities (NV).
A
minimum vesicle size diameter of 1 μm was used in the calculation of NV, which was then corrected for vesicularity (NmV). Vesicle number densities were also calculated for vesicle populations with equivalent diameters between 1 and 10 μm (NVF), to facilitate the
PT
determination of magma decompression rate (Toramaru, 2006; Shea et al., 2011; Simmons et
SC
RI
al., 2017).
4. RESULTS
NU
Druitt et al. (1989) and Pyle (1990a) previously defined four key stratigraphic units that commonly occur throughout the LP2 deposit sequence. These include:
MA
a very-thick basal pumice fall deposit (LP2-A), overlain by a diffusely-stratified to massive ignimbrite (LP2-B), which is overlain by
D
a widespread phreatomagmatic tuff (LP2-C), and finally
PT E
a lithic-rich lag breccia (LP2-D).
Subsequent analysis by Gertisser et al. (2009) delineated a minor precursory deposit
CE
(LP2-A1) and additional subunits within LP2-A (A2-1, A2-2, A3) and LP2-B (B1, B2). These units disconformably overlie deposits of the earlier 184 ka Lower Pumice 1 (LP1)
AC
eruption (Simmons et al., 2016; Simmons et al., 2017), cropping out in the caldera wall from Cape Loumaravi to Fira, and irregularly at Oia (Site 10, 11), Cape Perivola (Site 12) and Mt Megalo Vouno (Site 13) in the north. Vertical sections through the stratigraphy also occur at Mesa Pigadia Beach (Site 1) and Kambia Beach (Site 2), on south coast of the Akrotiri Peninsula (Fig 1A). Plinian fall deposits (LP2-A) have also been identified on the island of Anafi, ~31 km east of Santorini (Keller et al., 2014), while centimetre thick tephra deposits (V-1 tephra layer), considered to be the distal deposits of LP2 eruption, occur in deep-sea
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT cores throughout the Aegean (Keller et al., 1978; Keller, 1981; Keller et al., 2000). Revisions of the LP2 sequence, conducted as the basis for this study, has defined an additional twelve previously undescribed subunits. These subunits are discussed herein with reference to the established stratigraphic framework of the LP2 sequence.
PT
4.1. Componentry
RI
4.1.1. Juvenile Pyroclasts
SC
Three juvenile clast types are distinguished in the stratigraphy. These include white pumice pyroclasts, grey and banded pumice pyroclasts, and dark cauliform pyroclasts (Fig.
NU
2A-C). White pumice pyroclasts are dacitic to rhyodacitic in composition (65-71 wt. % SiO2; Fig. 2A, 3 - blue symbols), highly-vesicular (51-90 vol. %) and crystal-poor (< 5 vol. %; 6-8 wt. %; Cadoux et al., 2014), characterised by dispersed
MA
Gertisser et al., 2009;
phenocrysts of plagioclase, orthopyroxene and minor clinopyroxene (Gertisser et al., 2009;
D
Cadoux et al., 2014). Amphibole, ilmenite and magnetite also occur (Gertisser et al., 2009).
PT E
Analysed melt inclusions in minerals have maximum water contents ranging from 4.7 wt. % (Gertisser et al., 2009) to 5.3 wt. % (Cadoux et al., 2014). Grey and banded pumice
CE
pyroclasts are dacitic to rhyodacitic in composition (63-68 wt. % SiO2; Fig. 2B, 3 - orange symbols), have high vesicularities (42-85 vol. %) and low to moderate crystal contents (5-15
inclusions.
AC
vol. %), which include plagioclase, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene and felspathic mafic Cauliform pyroclasts are tabular to oval in morphology and have variably
crenulated surfaces (Fig. 2C). Analysed clasts are basaltic to basaltic andesite in composition (47-56 wt. % SiO2; Fig. 3 - green symbols), dense (~2000-2500 kg m-3) and variably crystalrich (20-40 vol. %), characterised by phenocrysts of plagioclase, olivine, two pyroxenes and iron oxides (Ti-magnetite and ilmenite; Gertisser et al., 2009). Maximum water contents of 4.0 wt. % were measured in olivine-hosted melt inclusions (Gertisser et al., 2009).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 1. Whole-rock major and trace element data. bd - below detection limit. W - White pumice. G - Grey and banded pumice. C - Cauliform pyroclasts.
4.1.2. Lithic Pyroclasts
PT
A variety of lithic clast assemblages have been identified within the LP2 sequence,
RI
which have been characterised broadly as either volcanic or basement-derived. Volcanic
sequence.
SC
lithic components, of all shapes (round to angular) and sizes (<2 m), occur throughout the Noted examples include poorly to moderately-vesicular basalts, crystal-rich
NU
basalts, aphanitic basalts and variably flow-banded andesite/dacites (Fig. 2D-G). Basementderived lithics are typically smaller (15-20 cm max) and less abundant (5 vol. %). Identified
schists (Fig. 2H-K).
MA
basement assemblages include granitoids, altered limestone, marbles, sandstones, slate and Approximately 20-30% of clasts, particularly basalts, exhibit
PT E
D
hydrothermal alteration.
Figure 2. Pyroclast assemblages in the LP2 sequence. Juvenile pyroclasts. A: White
CE
pumice. B: Grey and banded pumice. Note the alternating bands of light and dark coloured glass. C: Tabular, crenulated, cauliform basaltic pyroclasts, with adhered white pumice.
AC
Volcanic lithic assemblages. D: Mildly-vesiculated basalt. E: Dense, crystal-rich basalt. F: Aphanitic basalt.
G:
Flow-banded dacite.
Basement-derived lithic assemblages.
H:
Granodiorite. I: Altered limestone. J: Sandstone. K: Slate.
Figure 3. Total alkali silica (TAS) diagram illustrating the compositional spectrum of juvenile pyroclasts (white pumice - blue symbols, grey and banded pumice (G/B) - orange symbols, and cauliform pyroclasts - green symbols) from the LP2 sequence. TAS diagram
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from Le Maitre et al. (1989). Alkaline (dark grey) - subalkaline (light grey) boundary from Irvine and Baragar (1971). Symbol shapes (circle and square) represent included data from Druitt et al. (1999) and Gertisser et al. (2009), respectively.
4.2. Stratigraphic and lithofacies architecture
PT
The LP2 sequence consists of 18 lithological subunits that define five major
RI
stratigraphic divisions. These include, from the bottom up, a thin, fine-grained, pumice
SC
lapillistone unit (LP2-A1), a sequence of massive pumice lapillistones (LP2-A2, A3), a series of diffusely-stratified to massive, pumice lapilli-tuffs (LP2-B1-1, B1-2, B1-3, B2), a massive,
MA
breccias (LP2-D1, D2, D3, D4; Fig. 4, 5).
NU
poorly-sorted, pumice-lithic tuff (LP2-C1-1, C1-2 , C2-1, C2-2, C3-1, C3-2), and lithic
Figure 4. Stratigraphic unit correlations for the LP2 sequence, showing the locations of
PT E
D
measured sections on Santorini.
Figure 5. Stratigraphic subdivisions and architecture of the LP2 sequence, showing
CE
variations in juvenile (white, grey and banded pumice, and cauliform pyroclasts) and lithic
AC
clast (volcanic and basement lithics) assemblages.
4.2.1. LP2-A - Pumice lapillistones A sequence of moderately to well-sorted, pumice lapillistones, termed LP2-A1, A2-1, A2-2 and A3, are laterally widespread units that occur ubiquitously at the base of the deposit sequence (Fig. 6A, B; Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt et al., 1999; Gertisser et al., 2009; Keller et al., 2014). LP2-A1 is characterised by a clast-supported framework of rhyodacitic white pumice (⌀ - diameter ~2 cm; 14 cm thick near Athinios; Fig. 6C). On the Akrotiri Peninsula,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT LP2-A1 is thin (<3 cm thick), defined by very diffuse stratification of indurated ash (Fig. 6D, 7A). LP2-A2-1 (<2 m thick), which conformably overlies LP2-A1, has a lithic-rich base (<5 cm thick; ⌀ <1 cm; 40 vol. % lithics; Fig. 6C). LP2-A2-1 is also massive and reverselygraded (⌀ ~3 mm to 14 cm), characterised by a clast-supported framework of rhyodacitic white (⌀ 14 cm; 96 vol. %) and grey (⌀ 8 cm; 2 vol. %;) pumice, and dispersed volcanic
PT
lithics (⌀ <4 cm; 2 vol. %). LP2-A2-2 is massive and nongraded, distinguished from LP2-
RI
A2-1 by a larger fraction of grey and banded pumice lapilli (⌀ 7 cm; 3 vol. %), and volcanic
SC
lithic components (⌀ <3 cm; 3 vol. %; Gertisser et al., 2009). LP2-A3 is similarly massive and nongraded (Fig. 6E, F), defined by a framework of rhyodacitic white pumice (⌀ <30 cm;
NU
85-93 vol. %). However, LP2-A3 also has andesitic-dacitic grey and banded lapilli/blocks (⌀ <35 cm), and cauliform basalt clasts (⌀ 10 cm), which decrease (grey and banded pumice 11
MA
to 3 vol. %) and increase (cauliform basalts 7 to 15 vol. %) in abundance vertically upwards in the stratigraphy. Near Fira, grey and banded pumice pyroclasts are characterised by
D
elongate shapes, with long axis parallel to the depositional surface (Fig. 6E). Elsewhere,
PT E
pyroclasts of this type show no preferential plane of alignment. Volcanic (⌀ < 60 cm; 7 to 13 vol. %) and basement-derived (⌀ < 15 cm; 0 to 2 vol. %) lithic assemblages also increase in
CE
abundance vertically. Isopach and isopleth patterns for LP2-A2 and A3 show significant
AC
decreases in unit thickness, juvenile and lithic clast diameters towards the south, with dispersal axis towards the east (Fig. 7B-E). Such characteristics suggest the deposits formed via fallout from a buoyant eruption column (Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt et al., 1999; Gertisser et al., 2009; Keller et al., 2014). Lithic horizons and reverse grading of juvenile pyroclasts at the base of LP2-A2-1 are typical of vent opening/widening and wind shifts or waxing column heights, respectively (Wilson et al., 1980; Walker et al., 1984; Wilson and Walker, 1987; Edgar et al., 2002; Folch, 2012; Jordan et al., 2016).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 6. LP2-A - Massive pumice fall deposits. A: Pumice fall deposits within the caldera wall near Fira (top left of picture). Note the decrease in unit thickness towards the south (to the right of the picture). B: >20 m thick pumice fall deposits (LP2-A2, A3) overlying lithic lag breccias of the earlier LP1 eruption (Fira - Site 9). C, D: LP2-A1 precursory fall deposits, overlain by massive, reversely-graded, pumice lapillistone deposits (LP2-A2, A3) at (C)
PT
proximal vent localities (note the lithic-rich horizon at the base of LP2-A2-1; Fira - Site 9)
RI
and (D) distal vent localities (Cape Balos West - Site 4). E: Spatter-like grey and banded
SC
pumice in a clast-supported framework of white pumice pyroclasts. Note that the direction of clast elongation is parallel to the depositional surface (LP2-A3; Fira - Site 9). F: Massive
NU
pumice lapillistone with dispersed cauliform basalts/andesites (LP2-A3; Cape Balos West -
Figure 7.
MA
Site 4).
LP2 dispersal characteristics. A: Isopach maps detailing variations in unit
D
thickness for A: LP2-A1, B: LP2-A2, C: LP2-A3. D, E: Isopleth maps for LP2-A3 detailing
PT E
variations in (D) juvenile and (E) lithic clasts diameters. Thickness variations for units F:
CE
LP2-B, G: LP2-C, and H: LP2-D.
4.2.2. LP2-B - Diffusely-stratified to massive, poorly-sorted ignimbrite
AC
Diffusely-stratified to massive, poorly-sorted, pumice lapilli-tuff beds, conformably overly the fall deposits of LP2-A (Fig. 8A, B; Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt et al., 1999; Gertisser et al., 2009). Gertisser et al. (2009) previously defined two key subunits within LP2-B, termed LP2-B1 and LP2-B2. In this study, we have identified four key subunits, termed LP2B1-1, B1-2, B1-3 and B2, in reference to the nomenclature of Gertisser et al. (2009). LP2B1-1 (<50 cm thick) is diffusely-stratified, characterised by a matrix-supported framework of imbricated white (⌀ <3 cm; 15 vol. %) and grey (⌀ <2 cm; 3 vol. %) pumice, and volcanic
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT lithic assemblages (⌀ <2 cm; 15 vol. %). LP2-B1-2 (<30-40 cm thick) is massive and poorlysorted, with pinch and swell (dune-like) geometries (scales of several metres), consisting of white pumice (⌀ <10 cm; 40 vol. %), cauliform pyroclasts (⌀ <5 cm; 2 vol. %) and volcanic lithics (⌀ <6 cm; 5 vol. %). LP2-B1-3 (<80 cm thick) transitions vertically upwards from an initially diffusely-stratified base (with possible cross-bedding) to more massive depositional
PT
structures. The subunit consists of white pumice (⌀ <8 cm; 30 vol. %) and volcanic lithic
RI
components (⌀ <6 cm; 15 vol. %). LP2-B2 (<6 m thick) is entirely massive, charactered by
SC
inverse grading of white pumice (⌀ 20 cm; 35-40 vol. %) and subordinate volcanic lithic assemblages (⌀ 10 cm; 5 vol. %). A 30 cm interval at the base of LP2-B2 is pumice-poor and
lithic assemblages.
NU
lithic-rich (⌀ 20 cm; <40 vol. % lithics; Fig. 5, 8B). LP2-B1-3 and B2 lack basement-derived The ash matrix of each subunit consists of minor plagioclase and
MA
orthopyroxene crystal fragments, volcanic lithic grains and cuspate glass shards (Fig. 9A). On the Akrotiri Peninsula, these subunits range in thickness up to 6.6 m, although their
D
thickness varies significantly between localities (up to several metres difference; Fig. 7F).
PT E
Between Athinios and Fira, the deposits are generally thin or absent, highlighting the influence of pre-existing topography on the dispersal of LP2-B. These deposit characteristics
CE
(diffusely-stratified to massive, poorly-sorted, matrix-supported, cuspate glass shards) suggest the deposition of pumice, lithics and ash from a moderate to high-particle
AC
concentration, valley-confined, pyroclastic density current (PDC; Sparks et al., 1973; Cas and Wright, 1987; Branney and Kokelaar, 2002), associated with a magmatic style of eruption (Heiken and Wohletz, 1991; Cioni et al., 1992; van Otterloo et al., 2013).
Figure 8. LP2-B - Diffusely-stratified to massive PDC deposits. A: Vertical transition from diffusely-stratified deposits at the base, with pinch and swell geometries, to massive, unstructured, tabular ignimbrites (Cape Balos - Site 5). B: Planar-stratified deposits of LP2-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT B1-1, conformably overlying pumice fall deposits of LP2-A3, overlain by a massive, ‘dunelike’ PDC deposit of LP2-B1-2, a diffusely-stratified (predominantly planar with cryptic cross-bedding) to massive PDC deposit of LP2-B1-3, and a massive ignimbrite of LP2-B2. Note the occurrence of a lithic horizon at the base of LP2-B2 (Cape Balos - Site 5).
PT
Figure 9. Morphological features of ash shards from the LP2 sequence. A: Cuspate glass
RI
shards associated with a magmatic style of eruption (LP2-B2). B: Angular glass shards
SC
associated with a predominantly phreatomagmatic style of eruption (LP2-C2-2).
NU
4.2.3. LP2-C - Massive, fines-poor, lithic breccias and pumice-lithic lapilli-tuffs A package of massive lithic breccias (LP2-C1-1, C2-1, C3-1), and thick (<18.5 m),
of LP2-B (Fig. 10A, B).
MA
ash-rich, pumice-lithic lapilli-tuffs (LP2-C1-2, C2-2, C3-2) directly overly the PDC deposits LP2-C1-1 is generally tabular and unconstrained by
D
paleotopography, although pinch and swell geometries on scales of up to five metres are
PT E
common where the breccias have infilled erosional gullies (Fig. 10C; <8 m thick; Gertisser et al., 2009). The subunit is characterised by a clast-supported framework of white pumice
CE
lapilli (⌀ <6 cm; 20-25 vol. %), and a variety of volcanic (⌀ <1-2 m; <70 vol. %) and basement-derived (⌀ <5 cm; <2 vol. %) lithic assemblages (Fig. 10D). LP2-C1-1 grades
AC
sharply upwards into a pumice-lithic lapilli-tuff unit (LP2-C1-2), characterised by a matrixsupported framework of white pumice (⌀ <30 cm; 30 vol. %;) and volcanic lithic assemblages (⌀ 60 cm; 20 vol. %). LP2-C2-1 and C3-1 are similar to LP2-C1-1, except they are laterally discontinuous, less than one metre thick, matrix-supported and lack basementderived lithic assemblages (Fig. 10B). LP2-C2-2 and C3-2 have a similar componentry to LP2-C1-2. The ash matrix of LP2-C1-2, C2-2 and C3-2 consists of crystal fragments, volcanic lithic grains and blocky to cuspate glass shards (Fig. 9B). These units repeatedly
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT increase and decrease in thickness over several tens to hundreds of metres within the caldera wall sequence, parallel to the Akrotiri Peninsula (Fig. 7G). The massive, pumice-lithic lapilli-tuff deposits are interpreted as ‘Layer 2b’ ignimbrites that were deposited rapidly from a PDC (Sparks et al., 1973; Cas and Wright, 1987; Branney and Kokelaar, 2002). The abundance of lithic components and fine ash, with blocky to cuspate textures, in addition to
PT
the absence of accretionary lapilli, suggest these flow types were the product of a relatively
RI
‘dry’ phreatomagmatic style of eruption (Heiken and Wohletz, 1991; Cioni et al., 1992; van
SC
Otterloo et al., 2013; Jordan et al., 2014). The lithological properties of the LP2-C1-1 massive lithic breccia, and its association with the overlying pumice-lithic lapilli-tuff, are
NU
characteristic of Layer 1 ground breccias, which form through intense fluidisation at the head of a PDC (Walker et al., 1981; Druitt and Sparks, 1982; Wilson and Walker, 1982; Walker,
MA
1983; Walker, 1985; Allen and Cas, 1998) or at turbulent flow boundary layers (Fisher, 1990; Buesch, 1992). Subsequent lithic breccias (LP2-C2-1, C3-1) within the ignimbrite, which are
D
matrix-supported, are interpreted to reflect pulses within the PDC and discreet, high intensity
PT E
explosive events.
CE
Figure 10. LP2-C - Massive, fines-poor, lithic (ground) breccia overlain by a massive, poorly-sorted, pumice-lithic tuff. A: Massive phreatomagmatic PDC deposits of LP2-C
AC
overlying the LP2-A and B (Cape Balos - Site 5). B: Massive ignimbrite with discontinuous lithic horizons (lh; LP2-C; Oia 2 - Site 11). C: Ground breccia, with pinch and swell morphologies (LP2-C1-1), grading sharply upwards into a massive phreatomagmatic ignimbrite (LP2-C1-2; Cape Balos - Site 5). D: Matrix to clast-supported ground breccia (LP2-C1-1; Cape Balos West - Site 6).
4.2.4. LP2-D - Massive to diffusely-stratified, fines-poor, poorly-sorted, lithic breccia
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The LP2 sequence is capped by a thick package of rhyodacitic, lithic-rich breccias (Druitt et al., 1989; Druitt et al., 1999; Gertisser et al., 2009) that transition variably upwards from massive and matrix-supported (LP2-D1, D3) to diffusely-stratified and clast-supported (LP2-D2, D4; Fig. 11A, B). Subunits of this facies consist of varying proportions of white pumice (⌀ <5 cm; 3-10 vol. %), volcanic (⌀ <60 cm; 70 vol. %;) and basement-derived lithic
Although relatively widespread and tabular in geometry, LP2-D varies in
RI
(Fig 11A).
PT
assemblages (⌀ <20 cm; 2-5 %). Scour type structures are common at the base of LP2-D1
SC
thickness by up to several metres between closely spaced field sites (4.8 m at Site 5 to 8.4 m at Site 6; Fig. 7H). The abundance of lithics in the preserved deposit sequence, and the lack (i.e., lithic breccias don’t transition upwards into
NU
of identifiable facies associations
ignimbrite units), suggests that these breccias were deposited in deflation zones close to the
MA
vent whereby PDCs were unable to support the relatively dense lithic blocks that were incorporated into the collapsing eruption column (Wright and Walker, 1977; Druitt and
D
Sparks, 1982; Druitt, 1985; Walker, 1985; Allen and Cas, 1998; Branney and Kokelaar, 2002;
PT E
Pittari et al., 2008). Scour type structures at the base of LP2-D suggest the lithic-rich PDCs were highly erosive. These deposit characteristics are typical of lithic lag breccias and are
CE
expected to grade laterally (away from the vent) into lithic-poor ignimbrites (e.g., Minoan
AC
sequence; Druitt et al., 1999; Druitt, 2014).
Figure 11. LP2-D - Massive to diffusely-stratified, poorly-sorted, lithic lag breccias. A: Alternating horizons of massive and diffusively-stratified lithic breccias, with scour type structures at the base (LP2-D; Cape Balos West - Site 6). B: Massive, matrix-supported lithic breccia. (LP2-D1; Cape Balos West - Site 6).
4.3. Pyroclast properties
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4.3.1. Density and Vesicularity The median density of rhyodacitic pumice pyroclasts decrease (LP2-A to LP2-B) and then increase (LP2-B to LP2-D) within the stratigraphy of the LP2 sequence (Fig. 12A). Pumice from LP2-A2-1 have density and vesicularity ranges of 420-1230 kg m-3 and 52-83 vol. %, respectively, with median densities of 620 kg m-3. Pumice clasts from LP2-A2-2 and
PT
LP2-A3 have much lower densities of 350-1030 kg m-3 (VeT – total vesicularity 60-86 vol. %)
RI
and 360-950 kg m-3 (VeT 63-86 vol. %), respectively, with medians of 550 kg m-3 and 530 kg m-3. The median density of pumice in LP2-B2 is 460 kg m-3 (VeT 82 vol. %), ranging from
SC
280-640 kg m-3 (VeT 75-89 vol. %). Pumice clasts in LP2-C2-2 and LP2-D2 have similar
NU
minimum densities (270 kg m-3 and 260 kg m-3) to LP2-B2, but have significantly higher median (480 kg m-3; VeT 81 vol. %; LP2-C2-2, D2) and maximum densities of 710 kg m-3
MA
(VeT 72 vol. %; LP2-C2-2) and 1000 kg m-3 (VeT 60 vol. %; LP2-D2; Fig. 12A). Isolated vesicularity (VeI) ranges consistently between 1-13 vol. %, irrespective of stratigraphic
D
position. However, a very-weak relationship between VeI and VeT suggests that increasing
PT E
vesicle connectivity results as a function of increasing total vesicularity (Figure 12B). Based on these analyses, low, modal and high density pumice pyroclasts were sectioned for 2D
CE
image analysis and the characterisation of vesicle textures.
AC
Figure 12. Density and vesicularity characteristics for rhyodacitic pumice pyroclasts from the fall deposits (LP2-A2-1, A2-2, A3), magmatic ignimbrite (LP2-B2), phreatomagmatic tuff (LP2-C2-2) and lithic lag breccia (LP2-D). A: Density histograms. Bin size 100 kg m-3. Stars denote density classes from which samples were sectioned for 2D image analysis. B: Bivariate plots of connected versus total vesicularity. Oblique dashed lines represent isolated vesicularity (5 vol. % intervals).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4.3.2. Vesicle textures and size distributions Vesicles in analysed pumice from the LP2 sequence define symmetrical to coarseskewed unimodal to bimodal size distributions, with modes of 30 to 75 μm (Fig. 13A-C). Pumices from LP2-A (A2-1, A2-2, A3) have largely homogenous microvesicular textures, characterised by small, round, closely-spaced vesicles (diameters <60 μm) with thin glass
PT
walls (1-10 μm), irrespective of pyroclast density (Fig. 14A, B). Vesicle walls 1-5 μm thick
RI
are common between vesicles of similar size and shape, reflecting the simultaneous growth of
SC
closely-spaced bubbles (Klug et al., 2002). Vesicles >60 μm often have more elongate or irregular shapes, resulting from stretching or rupturing of the bubble wall during coalescence
NU
(Fig. 14A; e.g., Klug et al., 2002). Between 52-74 % of vesicles in each sample are <60 μm, while 13 to 32 % are >100 μm. In LP2-A1 and LP2-A3 the fraction of vesicles >100 μm
MA
decreases as a function of increasing pumice density (32 to 13% in LP2-A2-1; 24 to 16 % in LP2-A3); no obvious relationship exists for pumices from LP2-A2-2. This suggests that
D
pyroclast density is controlled, at least in part, by the abundance of large vesicles (Fig. 14B).
PT E
Pumice from LP2-B2, C2-2 and D2 have a smaller fraction of vesicles <60 μm, between 48 and 69 %. The fraction of vesicles >100 μm also decreases with increasing pumice density
CE
(38 to 17 % in LP2-B2; 33 to 21 % in LP2-C2-2; 40 to 27 % in LP2-D2), similar to clasts from LP2-A (Fig. 14A). However, unlike LP2-A, clasts from LP2-B2, C2-2 and D2 exhibit
AC
distinct microvesicular textural domains (Fig. 14A - LP2-B2, C2-2). These domains are typically bound by larger, more expanded vesicles that range in shape from round to stretched and highly irregular. Stretched vesicles in the samples reflect localised and preferential shearing (Klug et al., 2002; Houghton et al., 2010; Shea et al., 2012), while the irregular vesicle population reflects bubble coalescence (Fig. 14A; Klug et al., 2002). Vesicles >100 μm in diameter show evidence for either coalescence, resulting in irregular vesicle shapes, or significant bubble expansion. With respect to the latter, the surrounding vesicle population is
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT often variably deformed, appearing to wrap around or trace the boundary of the expanded vesicle (Fig. 14A - LP2-B2). Many clasts from the PDCs also have coarsely vesicular interiors and small vesicle rinds. Such textures likely reflect post-fragmentation bubble growth in the eruption column and encompassing PDCs (e.g., Houghton et al., 2010). Such
PT
textures are absent in clasts from LP2-A.
RI
Figure 13. Vesicle size distributions and number densities for low, modal and high density
SC
clasts from the fall deposits (LP2-A2-1, A2-2, A3), magmatic ignimbrite (LP2-B2), phreatomagmatic tuff (LP2-C2-2) and lithic lag breccia (LP2-D). A: Low density. B: Modal
NU
density. C: High density.
MA
Figure 14. Vesicle characteristics for pyroclasts from the fall deposits (LP2-A2-1, A2-2, A3), magmatic ignimbrite (LP2-B2), phreatomagmatic tuff (LP2-C2-2) and lithic lag breccia
D
(LP2-D). A: Characteristic vesicle textures for modal density clasts from each unit captured
PT E
at low (x25), medium (x100) and high (x500) magnifications. B: Vesicle characteristics for low, modal and high density pumice clasts from each major stratigraphic division of the LP2
CE
sequence (x 100 magnification). Note the general increase in vesicle wall thickness and the decrease in the abundance of large vesicles with increasing pumice density or decreasing
AC
vesicularity. R - Ruptured vesicle wall. P - Planar glass wall. D - Donut-like structures. mv - Microvesicular textures.
Post frag expan. – Vesicle (bubbles) that experienced post
fragmentation expansion. Pl. – Plagioclase.
4.3.3. Vesicle number density Vesicle number density (corrected for vesicularity; NmV) in pumice ranges over an order of magnitude from 1.1 x 109 to 5.1 x 1010 cm-3. The median and maximum NmV
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT increases vertically upwards within the basal fallout sequence with no overlap, from 4.0 x 109 - 5.1 x 109 cm-3 in LP2-A2-1, to 5.6 x 109 - 6.2 x 109 cm-3 in LP2-A2-2, and 6.2 x 109 - 1.0 x 1010 cm-3 in LP2-A3. However, the minimum NmV for clasts from each subunit is smaller, at 1.7 x 109 cm-3 for LP2-A2-1, 3.0 x 109 cm-3 for LP2-A2-2, and 1.2 x 109 cm-3 for LP2-A3 (Fig. 15). NmV in pumice from the PDC phases are significantly more variable. Pumice from
PT
LP2-B2 have similar minimum and median NmV of 2.3 x 109 and 2.7 x 109 cm-3, respectively,
RI
with maximum NmV over an order of magnitude larger, at 5.1 x 1010 cm-3. The NmV in
SC
pumice from LP2-C2-2 and LP2-D2 are generally similar (1 x 109 to 3 x 109 cm-3), with the exception of the modal density clast in D2 which has clusters of small round vesicles and
NU
associated number densities of 1.3 x 1010 cm-3. Excluding two samples from LP2-B2 and D2, which have anomalously high NmV, pumice from the PDC phases typically exhibit lower NmV
MA
relative to LP2-A (Table 2; Fig. 15). This is attributed to the occurrence of larger vesicles in
D
clasts from LP2-B, C and D, related to post-fragmentation expansion.
PT E
Table 2. Vesicularity data for low, modal and high density pyroclasts from selective units of the LP2 sequence. VeT - Total vesicularity. NmV - vesicularity corrected vesicle number
AC
10 μm.
CE
density for vesicles >1 μm. NVF - corrected vesicle number density for vesicles between 1 and
Figure 15. Variations in NmV between units of the LP2 sequence, compared with vesicle number density data for other well-known silicic eruptions (Adams et al., 2006; Carey et al., 2010; Houghton et al., 2010; Klug et al., 2002).
NmV for the LP2 clasts have been
recalculated with a minimum vesicle cut-off of 4 μm to enable comparison with other studies. Note that the NmV in pumice from the Crater Lake eruption was previously determined based
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT on a minimum vesicle cut-off size of 1 μm (Klug et al., 2002). Tie line denotes median NmV in clasts from the LP2 sequence.
5. DISCUSSION 5.1. Eruption initiation and magma ascent
PT
The high vesicularity of pumice, in addition to the broad spectrum of vesicle sizes and
RI
the observed textural characteristics of those clasts, attest to a prolonged history of magma
SC
degassing, bubble nucleation and growth. Symmetrical to coarse-skewed, unimodal vesicle size distributions in pumice from the fall deposits indicate a near continuous history of
NU
magma degassing (e.g., Klug et al., 2002; Alfano et al., 2012), with the largest vesicle population representing the earliest recorded stage of bubble nucleation and growth.
MA
Experimental results indicate that at confining pressures of 100 MPa and magma temperatures of 856°C (as estimated for the rhyodacitic LP2 magma), magma saturation was
D
reached at 3.4 wt. % H2O (Cadoux et al., 2014). At higher confining pressures of 200 MPa,
PT E
5.6-8 wt. % water is necessary to achieve saturation (Cadoux et al., 2014). Measured preeruptive water contents of 5-6 wt. % and calculated storage pressures of 200 MPa suggest
CE
that the magma was close to or at saturation at reservoir depths (Cadoux et al., 2014), and possibly experienced a period of equilibrium degassing prior to dyke propagation and magma
AC
ascent. Because H2O has a low specific volume of <3 cm3/g in 800-900°C magma at 200 MPa (McBirney, 1963), dyke propagation and magma ascent, driven purely by volatile exsolution, is unlikely. Instead, the increase in magmatic pressure, driven by the intrusion of compositionally diverse (higher temperature) magmas into the main rhyodacitic reservoir (evidenced by the occurrence of grey and banded pumice, and cauliform basaltic clasts in the stratigraphy of LP2-A), is considered to be the primary trigger for dyke propagation and magma ascent.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5.2. Magma decompression rates At the critical point (22 MPa; crustal depths <1 km depending on density), exsolved water transitions from a supercritical fluid to a gas (bubbles). As a result, the rate of specific volume growth of H2O accelerates, leading to increased rates of decompression and magma
PT
ascent (20 cm3/g at 22 MPa to 100 cm3/g at 5 MPa; McBirney, 1963).
According to
RI
nucleation theory, the rate of decompression can be projected if the properties of magmas are
SC
known (Toramaru, 2006; Shea et al., 2011). Magma decompression rates were determined by combining the methods of Toramaru (2006) and Shea et al. (2011). Vesicles between 1
NU
and 10 μm (NVF) were considered to reflect the final stage of magma degassing and bubble nucleation during late-stage magma ascent (Shea et al., 2011). Initial water contents (5.3 wt.
MA
%; Cadoux et al., 2014) were corrected for magma degassing based on the porosity of vesicles >10 μm as per the equilibrium models of Gardner et al. (1999) and Shea et al.
D
(2011). Magma temperatures of 856oC (Cadoux et al., 2014) and an effective surface tension
PT E
of 0.075 N m-1, characteristic of homogeneous nucleation in dacitic to rhyolitic melts (Gardner et al., 2013), were considered in all subsequent calculations (see supplementary
CE
material for further details). The maximum NVF in pumice from the fall units were used in the calculation of magma decompression rate. Decompression rates were not determined for
AC
the PDC phases due to evidence of post fragmentation bubble modification in the analysed clasts. Based on maximum NVF of 4.6 x 109 cm-3, 5.1 x 109 cm-3 and 9.2 x 109 cm-3 for LP2A2-1, A2-2 and A3, respectively, magma decompression rate is calculated to have increased from a maximum of 18 MPa s-1 to 29 MPa s-1, over the course of the initial Plinian phase.
5.3. Eruption characteristics 5.3.1. Mass discharge rates and plume height
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Mass discharge rates (MDR) are conventionally determined by measuring the volume of magma ejected over a specified period of time. In the absence of well-defined time constraints, MDR can be inferred based on eruption column height. Assessing the heights of volcanic plumes typically require well-exposed fall deposits and constraints on their dispersal (e.g., Carey and Sparks, 1986). Because most of the outcrop is within the caldera wall,
PT
relatively few isopleths could be extrapolated with certainty. Nonetheless, we have attempted
RI
a calculation, and estimate minimum plume heights of ~36 km for LP2-A3, based on crosswind distances of 10.7 km for a 6.4 cm isopleth (Fig. 7E; Carey and Sparks, 1986).
SC
These plume heights are consistent with interpreted MDR of 108 kgs-1 (Wilson et al., 1980;
NU
Sparks, 1986; Mastin et al., 2009; Woodhouse et al., 2013), and are the same as proposed
1990; Bonadonna and Costa, 2013).
D
5.3.2. Tephra volume
MA
plume heights for the Minoan eruption (36 km; Sigurdsson et al., 1990; Sparks and Wilson,
PT E
The minimum volume for the LP2-A2 and A3 fall deposits was determined as per the method of Legros (2000), which calculates tephra volume based on the thickness and area of
CE
a selected isopach (V = 3.69 x thickness x area). Using this method, minimum dense rock volumes of 0.08 km3 and 0.27 km3 were determined for LP2-A2 and A3, respectively (Fig.
AC
16). In contrast, Keller et al. (2014) estimates a combined minimum dense rock tephra volume of 0.60 km3 (LP2-A2 and A3), based on the method of Fierstein and Nathenson (1992). The volumes for the PDC phases could not be determined due to burial by the deposits of successive eruptions, deposition in a marine environment and multiple caldera collapse events.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 16. Isopach maps for the Plinian fall deposits (LP2-A2, A3), incorporating thickness data from Keller et al. (2014) on the island of Anafi. The minimum volume of each fall deposit was determined based on the deposit thickness and inferred area for each defined isopach, where V = 3.69 x thickness x area (Legros 2000).
PT
5.4. Transitions between eruption phases
RI
5.4.1. Precursor (LP2-A1) to Plinian (LP2-A2, A3)
SC
The characteristics of the precursor unit (LP2-A1) at the base of the deposit sequence attest to an initial short-lived plume from an opening phase of the eruption. Since the contact between
NU
it and the overlying main fallout unit (LP2-A2) is conformable at every observable location, and no paleosoil exists, it’s possible that only a few hours to weeks separated the two events.
MA
A repose period of more than a few weeks is unlikely given the excellent preservation of LP2-A1 (c.f., a 2-day hiatus during the 1600 eruption of Huaynaputina resulted in localised
D
erosion of the earlier Phase 1 deposits, prior to the initiation of Phase 2; Adams et al. 2001).
PT E
The dispersal and grainsize characteristics of LP2-A1 are comparable to Unit P0 of the Minoan sequence, interpreted as fallout from a 7-10 km plume (MDRs of ~106 kg s-1) during
CE
an initial phreatomagmatic event (Heiken and McCoy, 1990; Cioni et al., 2000; Druitt, 2014),
AC
suggesting similar plume heights and eruption conditions.
5.4.2. Plinian eruption column (LP2-A2, A3) to pyroclastic flows (LP2-B) The dispersal characteristics of the Plinian fall units (LP2-A2, A3) indicate a subaerial point source vent located NE of present-day Nea Kameni (Druitt et al., 1989; 1999; Keller et al., 2014). The concentration of lithics at the base of LP2-A2-1, in addition to evidence of reverse grading of pumice lapilli, attest to initial vent opening and clearing, followed by the progressive increase in eruption column height to ~36 km, comparable to phase P1b of the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Minoan eruption (Bonadonna and Costa, 2013).
The progressive increase in lithic
components vertically within the stratigraphy attest to continuous erosion of the conduit and vent over the course of LP2-A. The resulting change in conduit and vent geometry led to an increase in magma decompression rate (18 to 29 MPa s-1), a deepening of the fragmentation surface and the incorporation of basement-derived lithic components into the eruption
PT
column. The former also occurred during phases EU1 and EU2 of the 79 AD Vesuvius
RI
eruption (Shea et al., 2011), while a deepening of the fragmentation surface, as evidenced by the occurrence of plutonic lithics towards the top of Unit P1b, occurred during the initial
SC
Plinian phase of the Minoan eruption (Druitt, 2014). Inferred MDRs of 108 kg s-1 suggests
NU
that LP2-A was the product of at least four hours of near continuous fallout from a buoyant eruption column (based on a minimum DRE volume of 0.6 km3; Keller et al., 2014).
MA
Minimum volume estimates for P1 of the Minoan eruption of 0.24 km3 DRE (Pyle, 1990b) are four to eight times smaller than maximum dense rock estimates of 1-1.2 km3 (Pyle, 1990b)
D
and 2 km3 (Sigurdsson et al., 1990, 2006). This discrepancy suggests significantly larger
PT E
maximum dense rock volumes for LP2-A of 2.4-5 km3, which translates to ~16-32 hrs of pumice fallout prior to eruption column collapse. Because the mean density of juvenile
CE
pyroclasts decreased between LP2-A and B, and the influence of water during the early eruptive phases was negligible, we propose that continued vent widening and the inability to
AC
entrain air into the eruption column resulted in eruption column collapse (LP2-B; e.g., Andrews and Gardner, 2009).
5.4.3. Pyroclastic density currents (LP2-B) and the incorporation of water into the vent system (LP2-C) Eruption column collapse and the development of PDCs resulted in the emplacement of diffusely-stratified to massive ignimbrites (LP2-B). The absence of basement-derived
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT lithics within the ignimbrite indicates a shallowing of the fragmentation surface at the onset of this eruption phase, while the vertical change from diffusely-stratified to massive units reflect an increase in MDR and deposit aggradation rate or the progressive transition from an unsteady to steady density current. The former also occurred during the transition to the initial PDC phase of the Minoan eruption (P1 to P2; Druitt, 2014). Enlargement of the
PT
existing vent, or the development of new vents during incipient caldera collapse, facilitated a
RI
deepening of the fragmentation surface (as inferred by the occurrence of basement-derived lithic assemblages in LP2-C1-1) and the ingress of water into the magmatic system. This
SC
resulted in the development of lithic-rich PDCs, associated with a “dry” phreatomagmatic
NU
style of eruption. Multiple subunits of LP2-C attest to several discrete vent excavation events. The absence of basement-derived lithic assemblages, within the main body of these
MA
depositional subunits (excluding the basal unit LP2-C1-1), again suggests shallowing of the
D
fragmentation surface over the course of this phase.
PT E
5.4.3.1. The source of water driving phreatomagmatism We suggest that the main vent and any subsequent vents that developed over the
CE
course of the eruption, formed within a pre-existing flooded depression of Santorini (most likely a caldera associated with the earlier 196 ka Cape Therma 3 and 184 ka Lower Pumice
AC
1 eruptions; Simmons et al., 2016; Simmons et al., 2017). The ingress of water from the Aegean Sea (as is the case for present-day Santorini), or rainfall, may have flooded the early caldera. Although no direct evidence exists for either process, sapropel layers (layer S6 175-165 ka) in deep sea cores from the Mediterranean Sea (cores DED87-08 and KET80-04) and Tyrrhenian Sea (core MD84-641) show high organic carbon content and relatively low δ18O of G. bulloides and G. ruber (δ18O 0-0.2; foraminifer), suggesting high rainfall with low surface temperatures around the time of the LP2 eruption (12°C; Kallel et al., 2000). While
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT not discounting the possibility that the caldera was ‘open’ to the Aegean Sea, this data lend credence to the hypothesis that rain water, and rain water runoff, may have equally infilled a pre-existing caldera.
5.4.4. Transition to caldera collapse (LP2-D)
PT
The occurrence of lithic-rich lag breccias at the top of the deposit sequence, and a
RI
northward dipping unconformity (which truncates and terminates at the top of the lag
SC
breccias) beneath Fira (Fig. 17), suggests that caldera collapse accompanied and followed LP2-D. In particular, magma evacuation over the course of the eruption and subsequent
NU
under pressurisation of the magma reservoir led to the break-up of the reservoir roof block, the widening of fracture as vents, the discharge of lithic-rich PDCs and finally roof-block
Simmons et al., 2017).
MA
subsidence (Druitt and Sparks, 1984; Branney, 1995; Lipman, 1997; Cole et al., 2005; Paleomagnetic measurements indicate the lithic breccias were
D
deposited at relatively low temperatures of approximately 200 °C, although several clasts
PT E
from the same depositional unit indicate emplacement temperatures ranging from 100-600 °C (Bardot, 2000; Bardot et al., 1996). This variability has been attributed to the fragmentation
CE
and incorporation of crustal fragments from a range of crustal levels (shallow and deep), which have temperatures that fluctuate in accordance with the geothermal gradient, and the
AC
location and depth of the magma reservoir (Bardot, 2000). The occurrence of both volcanic and basement-derived lithic assemblages in LP2-D, support this conclusion, indicating deep fragmentation depths.
Such interpretations are consistent with field-based studies (e.g.,
Edgar et al., 2002; Simmons et al., 2017) and numerical models (e.g., Martı et al., 2000), which propose a deepening of the fragmentation surface as a consequence of decompression and caldera collapse.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure 17. Northward dipping unconformity truncating the LP2 sequence, reflecting latestage caldera collapse or post eruption slumping. Bedding of the Middle tuff series (ap4) is parallel to the unconformity. Deposits of the Middle tuff series also pinch towards the south, over the unconformity.
aa - Andesites of Cape Alai, ap1 - Cape Therma 1 Tuff, ra -
Rhyodacites of Cape Alonaki, rp3 - Lower Pumice Tuffs, ap4 - Middle tuffs, as2 - Andesites
PT
and basalts of Cape Skaros, rt - Rhyodacites of Therasia, rpb7 - Minoan tuff (nomenclature
SC
RI
from Druitt et al., 1999).
5.5. Implications
NU
Changes in the dynamics and dispersal processes of Plinian eruptions can result as a consequence of a variety of processes, including changes in magma properties (e.g.,
MA
composition, density, volatile content, viscosity; Wilson et al., 1980; Carey et al., 1990; Civetta et al., 1997; Balcone-Boissard et al., 2011; Shea et al., 2011), variations in magma
D
discharge rates (Wilson et al., 1980; Pensa et al., 2015), the presence or absence of external
PT E
water (Morrissey et al., 2000), and the geometry of the conduit and vent (Wilson et al., 1980; Carey and Sigurdsson, 1989; Woods and Bower, 1995; Koyaguchi et al., 2010). Interestingly,
CE
many sequences transition repeatedly from plume to flow events. For example, the 4.6 ka Fogo A sequence preserves evidence for simultaneous plume and ignimbrite-forming events
AC
resulting from instabilities in the eruption column and rapid variations in MDR, possibly associated with changing magma chemistries (Pensa et al., 2015). Alternating and repeated transitions from plume to flow during the 79 AD Vesuvius eruption have been interpreted as resulting from an increase in juvenile clast density (Shea et al., 2011), while interbedded phreatomagmatic surge deposits in the Minoan fallout deposit reflect the episodic influx of water into the magmatic system (Heiken and McCoy Jr, 1984). Such rapid and repeated transitions in dispersal processes are not typically associated with changes in vent
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT morphology. These examples are in contrast to the LP2 eruption, whereby vent widening facilitated eruption column collapse. Thus, in the presence of an unchanging single-vent system, fluctuations in dispersal processes may occur over relatively short temporal scales. However, given that all vents evolve over the course of an explosive eruption, we suggest that once a critical vent diameter/area is achieved, eruption column collapse and the
RI
PT
development of PDCs is inevitable.
SC
6. CONCLUSIONS
The LP2 eruption was triggered by the intrusion of primitive magmas into the more
NU
evolved rhyodacitic magmatic system, which facilitated dyke propagation and the initial discharge of magma from a point-source vent. The eruption commenced with the development of a short-lived precursor plume that
MA
deposited small pumice lapilli at near vent localities (LP1-A1). Vent widening over the course of the initial Plinian phase (LP2-A2, A3) resulted in a
D
PT E
deepening of the fragmentation surface and increased rates of magma decompression (18 MPa s-1 to 29 MPa s-1), which was followed by eruption column collapse and the
A major vent excavation event, possibly associated with incipient caldera collapse,
AC
CE
development of pyroclastic density currents (LP2-B).
resulted in a rapid increase in the fragmentation depth, followed by shallowing and the ingress of water into the magmatic system (LP2-C).
The development of fracture vents, associated with under-pressurisation of the magma reservoir, resulted in a deepening of the fragmentation surface, the discharge of lithicrich pyroclastic density currents and caldera collapse (LP2-D).
Although magma properties (composition, volatile content, temperature, viscosity etc.) are first order factors influencing the intensity of eruptions, the geometry and structure
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT of the vent system plays a very significant role in the course and temporal evolution of highly explosive, caldera-forming Plinian eruptions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was conducted as part of a PhD research dissertation supported by
PT
discretionary research funds of Ray Cas and a Faculty of Science Dean’s Postgraduate
RI
Research Scholarship. The paper has benefited from constructive reviews by S. Allen and
SC
one anonymous reviewer whom we thank for their suggestions. Thank you also to Jörg Keller for his correspondence regarding the V-1 (LP2) tephra layer in deep sea cores
NU
throughout the Aegean. The authors acknowledge use of facilities within the Monash Centre for Electron Microscopy (MCEM), which are supported under the Australian Research
MA
Council's Centres of Excellence funding scheme (COE for Design in Light Metals). This is
AC
CE
PT E
D
Laboratory of Excellence ClerVolc contribution number xx.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT REFERENCES CITED Acocella, V., 2007. Understanding caldera structure and development: An overview of analogue models compared to natural calderas. Earth-Science Reviews, 85(3–4): 125160. Adams, N.K., de Silva, S.L., Self, S., Salas, G., Schubring, S., Permenter, J.L. and Arbesman,
PT
K., 2001. The physical volcanology of the 1600 eruption of Huaynaputina, southern
RI
Peru. Bulletin of Volcanology, 62(8), 493-518.
SC
Adams, N.K., Houghton, B.F. and Hildreth, W., 2006. Abrupt transitions during sustained explosive eruptions: Examples from the 1912 eruption of Novarupta, Alaska. Bulletin
NU
of Volcanology, 69(2): 189-206.
Alfano, F., Bonadonna, C. and Gurioli, L., 2012. Insights into eruption dynamics from
MA
textural analysis: the case of the May, 2008, Chaitén eruption. Bulletin of Volcanology, 74(9): 2095-2108.
D
Allen, S.R. and Cas, R.A.F., 1998. Lateral variations within coarse co-ignimbrite lithic
PT E
breccias of the Kos Plateau Tuff, Greece. Bulletin of Volcanology, 59(5): 356-377. Andrews, B.J. and Gardner, J.E., 2009. Turbulent dynamics of the 18 May 1980 Mount St.
CE
Helens eruption column. Geology, 37(10): 895-898. Andriessen, P., Banga, G. and Hebeda, E., 1987. Isotopic age study of pre-Alpine rocks in the
AC
basal units on Naxos, Sikinos and Ios, Greek Cyclades. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 66(1): 3-14.
Andriessen, P.A.M., Boelrijk, N.A.I.M., Hebeda, E.H., Priem, H.N.A., Verdurnen, E.A.T. and Verschure, R.H., 1979. Dating the events of metamorphism and granitic magmatism in the Alpine orogen of Naxos (Cyclades, Greece). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 69(3): 215-225.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Balcone-Boissard, H., Boudon, G. and Villemant, B., 2011. Textural and geochemical constraints on eruptive style of the 79 AD eruption at Vesuvius. Bulletin of Volcanology, 73(3): 279-294. Bardot, L., 2000. Emplacement temperature determinations of proximal pyroclastic deposits on Santorini, Greece, and their implications. Bulletin of Volcanology, 61(7): 450-467.
PT
Bardot, L., Thomas, R. and McClelland, E., 1996. Emplacement temperatures of pyroclastic
RI
deposits on Santorini deduced from palaeomagnetic measurements: Constraints on
SC
eruption mechanisms, pp. 345-357.
Bonadonna, C. and Costa, A., 2013. Plume height, volume, and classification of explosive
NU
volcanic eruptions based on the Weibull function. Bulletin of Volcanology, 75(8): 119.
MA
Bond, A. and Sparks, R.S.J., 1976. The Minoan eruption of Santorini, Greece. Journal of the Geological Society, 132(1): 1-16.
D
Branney, M.J. and Kokelaar, B.P., 2002. Pyroclastic Density Currents and Sedimentation
PT E
from Ignimbrites. Geological Society, London. Bryan, S.E., Cas, R.A.F. and Martí, J., 1998. Lithic breccias in intermediate volume
CE
phonolitic ignimbrites, Tenerife (Canary Islands): constraints on pyroclastic flow depositional processes. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 81(3-4):
AC
269-296.
Buesch, D.C., 1992. Incorporation and redistribution of locally derived lithic fragments within a pyroclastic flow. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 104(9): 1193-1207. Cadoux, A., Scaillet, B., Druitt, T.H. and Deloule, E., 2014. Magma Storage Conditions of Large Plinian Eruptions of Santorini Volcano (Greece). Journal of Petrology, 55(6): 1129-1171.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Cantner, K., Carey, S. and Nomikou, P., 2014. Integrated volcanologic and petrologic analysis of the 1650AD eruption of Kolumbo submarine volcano, Greece. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 269: 28-43. Carey, R.J., Houghton, B.F. and Thordarson, T., 2010. Tephra dispersal and eruption dynamics of wet and dry phases of the 1875 eruption of Askja Volcano, Iceland.
PT
Bulletin of Volcanology, 72(3): 259-278.
RI
Carey, S. and Sigurdsson, H., 1989. The intensity of plinian eruptions. Bulletin of
SC
Volcanology, 51(1): 28-40.
Carey, S., Sigurdsson, H., Gardner, J.E. and Criswell, W., 1990. Variations in column height
NU
and magma discharge during the May 18, 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 43(1–4): 99-112.
MA
Carey, S. and Sparks, R.S.J., 1986. Quantitative models of the fallout and dispersal of tephra from volcanic eruption columns. Bulletin of Volcanology, 48(2-3): 109-125.
D
Cas, R.A.F., Porritt, L., Pittari, A. and Hayman, P.C., 2009. A practical guide to terminology
PT E
for kimberlite facies: A systematic progression from descriptive to genetic, including a pocket guide. Lithos, 112: 183-190.
CE
Cas, R.A.F., Wright, H.M.N., Folkes, C.B., Lesti, C., Porreca, M., Giordano, G. and Viramonte, J.G., 2011. The flow dynamics of an extremely large volume pyroclastic
AC
flow, the 2.08-Ma Cerro Galán Ignimbrite, NW Argentina, and comparison with other flow types. Bulletin of Volcanology, 73(10): 1583-1609. Cas, R.A.F. and Wright, J.V., 1987. Volcanic Successions: Modern and Ancient. Allen & Unwin Ltd, London, 528 pp. Chesner, C.A., 2012. The Toba Caldera Complex. Quaternary International, 258: 5-18. Chesner, C.A. and Rose, W.I., 1991. Stratigraphy of the Toba Tuffs and the evolution of the Toba Caldera Complex, Sumatra, Indonesia. Bulletin of Volcanology, 53(5): 343-356.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Chesner, C.A., Rose, W.I., Deino, A., Drake, R. and Westgate, J.A., 1991. Eruptive history of Earth's largest Quaternary caldera (Toba,Indonesia) clarified. Geology, 19(3): 200203. Chouliaras, G., Drakatos, G., Makropoulos, K. and Melis, N., 2012. Recent seismicity detection increase in the Santorini volcanic island complex. Natural Hazards and
PT
Earth System Sciences, 12(4): 859-866.
RI
Cioni, R., Gurioli, L., Sbrana, A. and Vougioukalakis, G., 2000. Precursory phenomena and
SC
destructive events related to the Late Bronze Age Minoan (Thera, Greece) and AD 79 (Vesuvius, Italy) Plinian eruptions; inferences from the stratigraphy in the
NU
archaeological areas, pp. 123-141.
Cioni, R., Sbrana, A. and Vecci, R., 1992. Morphologic features of juvenile pyroclasts from
MA
magmatic and phreatomagmatic deposits of Vesuvius. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 51(1): 61-78.
D
Civetta, L., Orsi, G., Pappalardo, L., Fisher, R.V., Heiken, G. and Ort, M., 1997.
PT E
Geochemical zoning, mingling, eruptive dynamics and depositional processes - The Campanian Ignimbrite, Campi Flegrei caldera, Italy. Journal of Volcanology and
CE
Geothermal Research, 75(3-4): 183-219. De Silva, S.L., Mucek, A., Gregg, P. and Pratomo, I., 2015. Resurgent Toba – field,
AC
chronologic, and model constraints on time scales and mechanisms of resurgence at large calderas. Frontiers in Earth Science, 3. Druitt, T.H., 1985. Vent evolution and lag breccia formation during the Cape Riva eruption of Santorini, Greece. Journal of Geology, 93(4): 439-454. Druitt, T.H., 2014. New insights into the initiation and venting of the Bronze-Age eruption of Santorini (Greece), from component analysis. Bulletin of Volcanology, 76(2): 1-21.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Druitt, T.H., Costa, F., Deloule, E., Dungan, M. and Scaillet, B., 2012. Decadal to monthly timescales of magma transfer and reservoir growth at a caldera volcano. Nature, 482(7383): 77-80. Druitt, T.H., Edwards, L., Mellors, R.M., Pyle, D.M., Sparks, R.S.J., Lanphere, M., Davies, M. and Barreirio, B., 1999. Santorini Volcano. The Geological Society, London.
PT
Druitt, T.H. and Francaviglia, V., 1992. Caldera formation on Santorini and the physiography
RI
of the islands in the late Bronze Age. Bulletin of Volcanology, 54(6): 484-493.
SC
38. Druitt, T.H., Mellors, R.A., Pyle, D.M. and Sparks, R.S.J., 1989. Explosive volcanism on Santorini, Greece. Geological Magazine, 126(2): 95-126.
NU
Druitt, T.H. and Sparks, R.S.J., 1982. A proximal ignimbrite breccia facies on Santorini, Greece. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 13(1-2): 147-171.
MA
Edgar, C.J., Wolff, J.A., Nichols, H.J., Cas, R.A.F. and Martı́, J., 2002. A complex Quaternary ignimbrite-forming phonolitic eruption: the Poris Member of the Diego
D
Hernández Formation (Tenerife, Canary Islands). Journal of Volcanology and
PT E
Geothermal Research, 118(1–2): 99-130. Fabbro, G.N., Druitt, T.H. and Scaillet, S., 2013. Evolution of the crustal magma plumbing
CE
system during the build-up to the 22-ka caldera-forming eruption of Santorini (Greece). Bulletin of Volcanology, 75(12): 1-22.
AC
Fierstein, J. and Nathenson, M., 1992. Another look at the calculation of fallout tephra volumes. Bulletin of Volcanology, 54(2): 156-167. Fisher, R.V., 1990. Transport and deposition of a pyroclastic surge across an area of high relief: The 18 May 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 102(8): 1038-1054.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Folch, A., 2012. A review of tephra transport and dispersal models: Evolution, current status, and future perspectives. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 235–236: 96-115. Fouque, F., 1879. Santorin et ses eruptions. Masson, Parris. Friedrich, W.L., Kromer, B., Friedrich, M., Heinemeier, J., Pfeiffer, T. and Talamo, S., 2006.
PT
Santorini eruption radiocarbon dated to 1627-1600 B.C. Science, 312(5773): 548.
RI
Froggatt, P.C., 1981. Stratigraphy and nature of Taupo Pumice Formation New Zealand. New
SC
Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 24(2): 231-248.
Gardner, J.E., Hilton, M. and Carroll, M.R., 1999. Experimental constraints on degassing of
NU
magma: isothermal bubble growth during continuous decompression from high pressure. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 168(1–2): 201-218.
MA
Gardner, J.E., Ketcham, R.A. and Moore, G., 2013. Surface tension of hydrous silicate melts: Constraints on the impact of melt composition. Journal of Volcanology and
D
Geothermal Research, 267: 68-74.
PT E
Gertisser, R., Preece, K. and Keller, J., 2009. The Plinian Lower Pumice 2 eruption, Santorini, Greece: Magma evolution and volatile behaviour. Journal of Volcanology and
CE
Geothermal Research, 186(3-4): 387-406. Gregg, P.M., de Silva, S.L., Grosfils, E.B. and Parmigiani, J.P., 2012. Catastrophic caldera-
AC
forming eruptions: Thermomechanics and implications for eruption triggering and maximum caldera dimensions on Earth. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 241–242(0): 1-12. Heiken, G. and McCoy, F., 1990. Precursory Activity to the Minoan Eruption, Thera, Greece. In: D.A. Hardy, J. Keller, V.P. Galanopoulos, N.C. Flemming and T.H. Druitt (Editors), Thera and the Aegean World III. The Thera Foundation, London, pp. 79-88.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Heiken, G. and McCoy Jr, F., 1984. Caldera development during the Minoan eruption, Thira, Cyclades, Greece. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(B10): 8441-8462. Heiken, G. and Wohletz, K., 1991. Fragmentation processes in explosive volcanic eruptions. Sedimentation in volcanic settings: 19-26. Houghton, B.F., Carey, R.J., Cashman, K.V., Wilson, C.J.N., Hobden, B.J. and Hammer, J.E.,
PT
2010. Diverse patterns of ascent, degassing, and eruption of rhyolite magma during
RI
the 1.8ka Taupo eruption, New Zealand: Evidence from clast vesicularity. Journal of
SC
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 195(1): 31-47.
Houghton, B.F., Carey, R.J. and Rosenberg, M.D., 2014. The 1800a Taupo eruption: "Ill
NU
wind" blows the ultraplinian type event down to Plinian. Geology, 42(5): 459-461. Houghton, B.F., Hobden, B.J., Cashman, K.V., Wilson, C.J.N. and Smith, R.T., 2003. Large-
MA
Scale Interaction of Lake Water and Rhyolitic Magma During the 1.8 Ka Taupo Eruption, New Zealand, Explosive Subaqueous Volcanism. American Geophysical
D
Union, pp. 97-109.
PT E
Hübscher, C., Ruhnau, M. and Nomikou, P., 2015. Volcano-tectonic evolution of the polygenetic Kolumbo submarine volcano/Santorini (Aegean Sea). Journal of
CE
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 291: 101-111. Irvine, T.N. and Baragar, W.R.A., 1971. A guide to the chemical classification of common
AC
volcanic rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8: 523-548. Jackson, J., 1994. Active tectonics of the Aegean region. Annual Review of Earth & Planetary Sciences, 22: 239-271. Jordan, S.C., Dürig, T., Cas, R.A.F. and Zimanowski, B., 2014. Processes controlling the shape of ash particles: Results of statistical IPA. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 288(0): 19-27.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Jordan, S.C., Le Pennec, J.L., Gurioli, L., Roche, O. and Boivin, P., 2016. Highly explosive eruption of the monogenetic 8.6 ka BP La Vache et Lassolas scoria cone complex (Chaîne des Puys, France). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 313: 15-28. Kallel, N., Duplessy, J.C., Labeyrie, L., Fontugne, M., Paterne, M. and Montacer, M., 2000.
PT
Mediterranean pluvial periods and sapropel formation over the last 200 000 years.
RI
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 157(1–2): 45-58.
SC
Kaviris, G., Papadimitriou, P., Kravvariti, P., Kapetanidis, V., Karakonstantis, A., Voulgaris, N. and Makropoulos, K., 2015. A detailed seismic anisotropy study during the 2011-
NU
2012 unrest period in the Santorini Volcanic Complex. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 238: 51-88.
MA
Keller, J., 1981. Quaternary Tephrochronology in the Mediterranean Region. In: S. Self and R.S.J. Sparks (Editors), Tephra Studies. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series.
D
Springer Netherlands, pp. 227-244.
PT E
Keller, J., Dietrich, V., Reusser, E., Gertisser, R. and Aarburg, S., 2010. Recognition of a major ignimbrite in the early evolution of the Santorini Group: the Christiani
CE
Ignimbrite, Cities on Volcanoes 6, Tenerife, Spain, pp. 4-5. Keller, J., Gertisser, R., Reusser, E. and Dietrich, V., 2014. Pumice deposits of the Santorini
AC
Lower Pumice 2 eruption on Anafi island, Greece: Indications for a Plinian event of exceptional magnitude. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 278-279: 120-128. Keller, J., Kraml, M. and Schwarz, M., 2000. Dating major volcanic paroxysms within the deep-sea record: the example of the Thera Formation, Santorini, Greece, IAVCEI General Assembly, Bali, Indonesia, pp. 16.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Keller, J., Ryan, W.B.F., Ninkovich, D. and Altherr, R., 1978. Explosive volcanic activity in the Mediterranean over the past 200,000 yr as recorded in deep-sea sediments. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 89(4): 591-604. Kilias, S.P., Nomikou, P., Papanikolaou, D., Polymenakou, P.N., Godelitsas, A., Argyraki, A., Carey, S., Gamaletsos, P., Mertzimekis, T.J., Stathopoulou, E., Goettlicher, J.,
PT
Steininger, R., Betzelou, K., Livanos, I., Christakis, C., Bell, K.C. and Scoullos, M.,
RI
2013. New insights into hydrothermal vent processes in the unique shallow-submarine
SC
arc-volcano, Kolumbo (Santorini), Greece. Sci. Rep., 3.
Klug, C., Cashman, K. and Bacon, C., 2002. Structure and physical characteristics of pumice
NU
from the climactic eruption of Mount Mazama (Crater Lake), Oregon. Bulletin of Volcanology, 64(7): 486-501.
MA
Koyaguchi, T., Suzuki, Y.J. and Kozono, T., 2010. Effects of the crater on eruption column dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth, 115(7).
D
Le Maitre, R.W., bateman, P., Dudek, A., Keller, J., Lameyre Les bas, M.J., Sabine, P.A.,
PT E
Schmid, R., Sorensen, H., Streckeisen, A., Wolley, A.R. and Zanettin, B., 1989. A classification of igneous rocks and glossary terms. Blackwell Scientific Publishing,
CE
Oxford.
Lee, S., Ramsey, C.B. and Hardiman, M., 2013. Modeling the age of the Cape Riva (Y-2)
AC
tephra. Radiocarbon, 55(2-3): 741-747. Legros, F., 2000. Minimum volume of a tephra fallout deposit estimated from a single isopach. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 96(1–2): 25-32. Liew, T.C. and Hofmann, A.W., 1988. Precambrian crustal components, plutonic associations, plate environment of the Hercynian Fold Belt of central Europe: Indications from a Nd and Sr isotopic study. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 98(2): 129-138.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Lips, A.L.W., Wijbrans, J.R. and White, S.H., 1999. New insights from 40Ar/39Ar laserprobe dating of white mica fabrics from the Pelion Massif, Pelagonian Zone, Internal Hellenides, Greece: implications for the timing of metamorphic episodes and tectonic events in the Aegean region. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 156(1): 457-474.
PT
Makris, J., 1978. The crust and upper mantle of the Aegean region from deep seismic
RI
soundings. Tectonophysics, 46(3-4): 269-284.
SC
Martı, J., Folch, A., Neri, A. and Macedonio, G., 2000. Pressure evolution during explosive caldera-forming eruptions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 175(3–4): 275-287.
NU
Mastin, L. G., Guffanti, M., Servranckx, R., Webley, P., Barsotti, S., Dean, K., Durant, A., Ewert, J.W., Neri, A., Rose, W.I., Schneider, D., Siebert, L., Stunder, B., Swanson, G.,
MA
Tupper, A., Volentik, A., Waythomas, C.F., 2009. A multidisciplinary effort to assign realistic source parameters to models of volcanic ash-cloud transport and dispersion
D
during eruptions Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 186(1-2), 10-21.
PT E
McBirney, A.R., 1963. Factors governing the nature of submarine volcanism. Bulletin Volcanologique, 26(1): 455-469.
CE
McLeod, P. and Tait, S., 1999. The growth of dykes from magma chambers. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 92(3-4): 231-245
AC
McKenzie, D.P., 1970. Plate tectonics of the mediterranean region. Nature, 226(5242): 239243.
Mercier, J.L., Sorel, D., Vergely, P. and Simeakis, K., 1989. Extensional tectonic regimes in the Aegean basins during the Cenozoic. Basin Research, 2(1): 49-71. Morrissey, M., Zimanowski, B., Wohletz, K. and Buettner, R., 2000. Phreatomagmatic Fragmentation. In: H. Sigurdsson, B.F. Houghton, S.R. McNutt, H. Rymer and J. Stix (Editors), Encyclopedia of Volcanoes. Academic press, San Diego.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Newman, A.V., Stiros, S., Feng, L., Psimoulis, P., Moschas, F., Saltogianni, V., Jiang, Y., Papazachos, C., Panagiotopoulos, D., Karagianni, E. and Vamvakaris, D., 2012. Recent geodetic unrest at Santorini Caldera, Greece. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(6). Nicholls, I.A., 1971. Petrology of santorini volcano, cyclades, Greece. Journal of Petrology,
PT
12(1): 67-119.
RI
Nomikou, P., Carey, S., Papanikolaou, D., Croff Bell, K., Sakellariou, D., Alexandri, M. and
SC
Bejelou, K., 2012. Submarine volcanoes of the Kolumbo volcanic zone NE of Santorini Caldera, Greece. Global and Planetary Change(0).
NU
Nomikou, P., Papanikolaou, D., Alexandri, M., Sakellariou, D. and Rousakis, G., 2013. Submarine volcanoes along the aegean volcanic arc. Tectonophysics, 597-598: 123-
MA
146.
Papadimitriou, P., Kapetanidis, V., Karakonstantis, A., Kaviris, G., Voulgaris, N. and
D
Makropoulos, K., 2015. The Santorini Volcanic Complex: A detailed multi-parameter
PT E
seismological approach with emphasis on the 2011-2012 unrest period. Journal of Geodynamics, 85: 32-57.
CE
Papanikolaou, D., 1987. Tectonic Evolution of the Cycladic Blueschist Belt (Aegean Sea, Greece). In: H. Helgeson (Editor), Chemical Transport in Metasomatic Processes.
AC
NATO ASI Series. Springer Netherlands, pp. 429-450. Papazachos, B.C. and Comninakis, P.E., 1971. Geophysical and Tectonic Features of the Aegean Arc. J. Geophys. Res., 76(35): 8517-8533. Parks, M.M., Moore, J.D.P., Papanikolaou, X., Biggs, J., Mather, T.A., Pyle, D.M., Raptakis, C., Paradissis, D., Hooper, A., Parsons, B. and Nomikou, P., 2015. From quiescence to unrest: 20 years of satellite geodetic measurements at Santorini volcano, Greece. Journal of Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Pensa, A., Cas, R., Giordano, G., Porreca, M. and Wallenstein, N., 2015. Transition from steady to unsteady Plinian eruption column: the VEI 5, 4.6 ka Fogo A Plinian eruption, São Miguel, Azores. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 305: 1-18. Perissoratis, C., 1995. The Santorini volcanic complex and its relation to the stratigraphy and structure of the Aegean arc, Greece. Marine Geology, 128(1–2): 37-58.
PT
Pfeiffer, T., 2001. Vent development during the Minoan eruption (1640 BC) of Santorini,
RI
Greece, as suggested by ballistic blocks. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
SC
Research, 106(3-4): 229-242.
Pichler, H. and Friedrich, W.L., 1980. Mechanism of the Minoan Eruption of Santorini. In: C.
NU
Doumas (Editor), Thera and the Aegean World II. Thera and the Agean World, London, pp. 15-30.
MA
Pittari, A., Cas, R.A.F., Wolff, J.A., Nichols, H.J., Larson, P.B. and Martí, J., 2008. Chapter 3 The Use of Lithic Clast Distributions in Pyroclastic Deposits to Understand Pre- and
D
Syn-Caldera Collapse Processes: A Case Study of the Abrigo Ignimbrite, Tenerife,
PT E
Canary Islands. In: G. Joachim, M. Joan and iacute (Editors), Developments in Volcanology. Elsevier, pp. 97-142.
CE
Polacci, M., 2005. Constraining the dynamics of volcanic eruptions by characterization of pumice textures. Annals of Geophysics, 48(4-5): 731-738.
AC
Pyle, D., 1990a. Geological and radiochemical studies on young volcanoes: Santorini, Greece and Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania, University of Cambridge. Pyle, D., 1990b. New estimates for the volume of the Minoan eruption. In: Hardy, D.A., Keller, J., Galanopoulos, V.P., Flemming, N.C., Druitt, T.H. (Eds.), Thera and the Aegean World III, vol. 2. The Thera Foundation, London, pp. 113–121. Pyle, D.M. and Elliott, J.R., 2006. Quantitative morphology, recent evolution, and future activity of the Kameni Islands volcano, Santorini, Greece. Geosphere, 2(5): 253-268.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Sahagian, D.L. and Proussevitch, A.A., 1998. 3D particle size distributions from 2D observations: stereology for natural applications. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 84(3–4): 173-196. Schliestedt, M., Altherr, R. and Mathews, A., 1987. Evolution of the Cyclandic crystalline complex: petrology, isotope geochemistry and geochronology. In: R. Helgeson
PT
(Editor), Chemical processes in metasomatic processes. NATO Advanced Study
RI
Institute Series. Reidal, Dordrecht, pp. 389-428.
SC
Shea, T., Gurioli, L. and Houghton, B.F., 2012. Transitions between fall phases and pyroclastic density currents during the AD 79 eruption at Vesuvius: Building a
NU
transient conduit model from the textural and volatile record. Bulletin of Volcanology, 74(10): 2363-2381.
MA
Shea, T., Gurioli, L., Houghton, B.F., Cioni, R. and Cashman, K.V., 2011. Column collapse and generation of pyroclastic density currents during the A.D. 79 eruption of
D
Vesuvius: The role of pyroclast density. Geology, 39(7): 695-698.
PT E
Shea, T., Houghton, B.F., Gurioli, L., Cashman, K.V., Hammer, J.E. and Hobden, B.J., 2010. Textural studies of vesicles in volcanic rocks: An integrated methodology. Journal of
CE
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 190(3-4): 271-289. Sigurdsson, H., Carey, S., Alexandri, M., Vougioukalakis, G., Croff, K., Roman, C.,
AC
Sakellariou, D., Anagnostou, C., Rousakis, G., Ioakim, C., Gogou, A., Ballas, D., Misaridis, T. and Nomikou, P., 2006. Marine investigations of Greece's Santorini volcanic field. Eos, 87(34): 337-339. Sigurdsson, H., Carey, S. and Devine, J.D., 1990. Assessment of Mass, Dynamics and Environmental Effects of the Minoan Eruption of Santorini Volcano. In: D.A. Hardy, J. Keller, V.P. Galanopoulos, N.C. Flemming and T.H. Druitt (Editors), Thera and the Aegean World III. The Thera Foundation, London, pp. 100-112.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Silva, C., 2008. Reconstruction and eruptive dynamics of the Holocene basaltic-andesitic Pucón Ignimbrite, University of Blaise Pascal. Simmons, J. M., Carey, R. J., Cas, R.A.F., Druitt, T.H., 2017. High magma decompression rates at the peak of a violent caldera-forming eruption (Lower Pumice 1 eruption, Santorini, Greece). Bulletin of Volcanology, 79(6):42
PT
Simmons, J. M., Cas, R.A.F., Druitt, T.H. and Folkes, C.B., 2016. Complex variations during
RI
a caldera-forming Plinian eruption, including precursor deposits, thick pumice fallout,
SC
co-ignimbrite breccias and climactic lag breccias: The 184 ka Lower Pumice 1 eruption sequence, Santorini, Greece. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal
NU
Research, 324: 200-219.
Skarpelis, N., Kyriakopoulos, K. and Villa, I., 1992. Occurrence and40Ar/39Ar dating of a
MA
granite in Thera (Santorini, Greece). Geologische Rundschau, 81(3): 729-735. Sparks, R.S.J., 1986. The dimensions and dynamics of volcanic eruption columns. Bulletin of
D
Volcanology, 48(1): 3-15.
1(3): 115-118.
PT E
Sparks, R.S.J., Self, S. and Walker, G.P.L., 1973. Products of Ignimbrite Eruptions. Geology,
CE
Sparks, R.S.J. and Wilson, C.J.N., 1990. The Minoan Deposits: A review of their Characteristics and Interpretation. In: D.A. Hardy, J. Keller, V.P. Galanopoulos, N.C.
AC
Flemming and T.H. Druitt (Editors), Thera and the Aegean World III The Thera Foundation, London, pp. 89-99. Thomas, R.M.E. and Sparks, R.S.J., 1992. Cooling of tephra during fallout from eruption columns. Bulletin of Volcanology, 54(7): 542-553. Toramaru, A., 2006. BND (bubble number density) decompression rate meter for explosive volcanic eruptions. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 154(3–4): 303316.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Urai, J.L., Schuiling, R.D. and Jansen, J.B.H., 1990. Alpine deformation on Naxos (Greece), Geological Society Special Publication, pp. 509-522. van der Maar, P. and Jansen, J.B., 1983. The geology of the polymetamorphic complex of Ios, Cyclades, Greece and its significance for the Cycladic Massif. Geologische Rundschau, 72(1): 283-299.
PT
van Otterloo, J., Cas, R.A.F. and Sheard, M.J., 2013. Eruption processes and deposit
RI
characteristics at the monogenetic Mt. Gambier Volcanic Complex, SE Australia:
SC
Implications for alternating magmatic and phreatomagmatic activity. Bulletin of Volcanology, 75(8): 1-21.
NU
Walker, G.P.L., 1981a. Plinian eruptions and their products. Bulletin Volcanologique, 44(3): 223-240.
MA
Walker, G.P.L., 1981b. The Waimihia and Hatepe plinian deposits from the rhyolitic Taupo Volcanic Centre. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 24(3): 305-324.
D
Walker, G.P.L., 1983. Ignimbrite types and ignimbrite problems. Journal of Volcanology and
PT E
Geothermal Research, 17(1-4): 65-88. Walker, G.P.L., 1985. Origin of coarse lithic breccias near ignimbrite source vents. Journal of
CE
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 25(1-2): 157-171. Walker, G.P.L., Self, S. and Froggatt, P.C., 1981. The ground layer of the taupo ignimbrite:
AC
A striking example of sedimentation from a pyroclastic flow. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 10(1–3): 1-11. Walker, G.P.L., Self, S. and Wilson, L., 1984. Tarawera 1886, New Zealand — A basaltic plinian fissure eruption. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 21(1–2): 61-78.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Wallace, P.J., Plank, T., Edmonds, M. and Hauri, E.H., 2015. Chapter 7 - Volatiles in Magmas. In: H. Sigurdsson (Editor), The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (Second Edition). Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp. 163-183. Wilson, C.J.N., Houghton, B.F., McWilliams, M.O., Lanphere, M.A., Weaver, S.D. and Briggs, R.M., 1995. Volcanic and structural evolution of Taupo Volcanic Zone, New
PT
Zealand: a review. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 68(1-3): 1-28.
RI
Wilson, C.J.N. and Walker, G.P.L., 1982. Ignimbrite depositional facies: the anatomy of a
SC
pyroclastic flow. Journal of the Geological Society, 139(5): 581-592. Wilson, L., Stephen, R., Sparks, J. and Walker, G.P.L., 1980. Explosive volcanic eruptions -
NU
IV. The control of magma properties and conduit geometry on eruption column behaviour. Geophysical Journal, Royal Astronomical Society, 63(1): 117-148.
MA
Wilson, L. and Walker, G.P.L., 1987. Explosive volcanic eruptions - VI. Ejecta dispersal in plinian eruptions: the control of eruption conditions and atmospheric properties.
D
Geophysical Journal International, 89(2): 657-679.
PT E
Woodhouse, M., Hogg, A., Phillips, J., Sparks, R., 2013. Interaction between volcanic plumes and wind during the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption, Iceland. Journal of
CE
Geophysical Research B: Solid Earth, 118(1), 92-109. Woods, A.W. and Bower, S.M., 1995. The decompression of volcanic jets in a crater during
AC
explosive volcanic eruptions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 131(3–4): 189-205. Wright, J.V. and Walker, G.P.L., 1977. The ignimbrite source problem: Significance of a coignimbrite lag-fall deposit. Geology, 5(12): 729-732.
Figure 1
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
Figure 2
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
Figure 3
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 4
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 5
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 6
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 7
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
Figure 8
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
Figure 9
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 10
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
Figure 11
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
Figure 12
Figure 13
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
Figure 14
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
Figure 15
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
Figure 16
PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
Figure 17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT TABLE 1.
Major Elements (Wt. %) SiO2
TiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MnO
MgO
CaO
Na2O
K2O
P2O5
SO3
LOI
Tot.
W
64.72
0.45
13.92
3.32
0.12
0.91
1.74
5.59
2.94
0.08
bd
6.78
100.58
LP2-A2
W
63.33
0.48
14.16
3.45
0.12
0.82
1.97
5.58
2.85
0.1
0.02
7.97
100.86
LP2-A3
W
66.4
0.53
14.82
3.87
0.12
0.84
2.22
4.77
2.8
0.1
bd
4.26
100.73
LP2-A3
G
62.78
0.81
15.74
5.44
0.15
1.72
3.98
5.14
2.06
0.22
0.01
2.71
100.76
LP2-A3
C
63.01
0.84
16.71
4.86
0.12
1.46
4.44
4.79
2.12
0.18
0.08
2.22
100.83
LP2-B1-1
W
60.2
0.41
13.03
3.07
0.1
0.67
1.84
5.19
2.73
0.08
bd
13.51
100.82
LP2-B2
W
68.28
0.47
14.54
3.37
0.12
0.54
1.77
5.01
3.15
0.09
bd
3.63
100.97
LP2-C1
W
67.18
0.47
14.38
3.32
0.11
0.53
1.94
LP2-C2
W
67.1
0.45
14.39
3.26
0.11
0.53
1.9
LP2-C3
W
67.5
0.47
14.52
3.39
0.11
0.54
LP2-D3
W
68.1
0.49
14.6
3.33
0.11
0.62
4.84
3.12
0.09
bd
4.73
100.71
4.8
3.21
0.08
0.01
5.02
100.87
SC
RI
PT
LP2-A1
4.75
3.25
0.09
bd
4.16
100.65
1.77
4.51
3.16
0.1
bd
3.91
100.71
NU
1.87
Zr
Nb
Mo
Cd
MA
Trace Elements (ppm) Sn
Sb
Cs
Ba
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
W
274
11.7
2.40
0.14
4.29
0.35
3.17
410
26.3
54.5
6.26
23.8
5.48
1.07
LP2-A2
W
263
11.6
2.48
0.13
2.90
0.26
2.67
424
26.4
53.0
6.44
24.8
5.74
1.18
LP2-A3
W
294
12.9
2.66
0.14
3.08
0.35
3.12
466
28.6
59.3
7.02
26.9
6.19
1.28
LP2-A3
G
225
11.2
2.23
0.12
2.48
0.25
2.23
379
24.6
51.4
6.35
25.5
6.06
1.51
LP2-A3
C
223
10.7
LP2-B1
W
253
11.3
LP2-B4
W
305
12.8
LP2-C1
W
309
13.0
LP2-C2
W
316
13.4
LP2-C3
W
312
LP2-D3
W
312
PT E
D
LP2-A1
2.89
0.11
2.42
0.26
2.54
437
24.6
50.3
5.98
23.3
5.44
1.37
1.92
0.10
2.46
0.27
2.55
377
26.5
50.8
5.96
22.8
5.55
1.05
2.35
0.11
2.73
0.37
3.08
468
31.3
60.2
6.98
26.8
6.48
1.23
2.78
0.16
3.78
0.30
3.36
478
29.4
60.5
7.16
27.2
6.29
1.25
0.15
3.29
0.31
3.34
511
29.8
61.1
7.15
27.2
6.26
1.25
2.77
0.15
3.17
0.31
3.25
470
29.6
60.7
7.15
27.4
6.30
1.27
13.6
2.70
0.15
3.18
0.39
3.11
456
28.4
59.1
6.93
26.6
6.15
1.15
AC
CE
2.90
13.3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Trace Elements (ppm) Li
Be
Sc
V
Cr
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Ga
As
Rb
Sr
Y
W
17.4
2.04
8.52
16.2
17.6
3.17
6.49
12.9
105
15.2
9.51
101
75.1
45.6
LP2-A2
W
14.1
1.88
8.74
10.7
16.4
2.43
1.46
5.60
81.2
15.4
5.66
87.9
98.0
46.8
LP2-A3
W
14.5
2.13
10.6
22.7
27.3
3.82
2.53
5.91
75.1
17.3
5.46
103
102
50.6
LP2-A3
G
11.7
1.71
15.1
62.4
24.0
7.63
4.75
9.36
98.8
17.6
4.26
75.0
162
46.7
LP2-A3
C
15.3
1.78
15.2
90.4
19.0
7.42
1.64
16.4
78.1
18.2
11.4
84.3
211
41.9
LP2-B1
W
11.8
1.81
9.25
10.6
15.5
2.79
2.68
9.31
61.9
13.5
2.63
87.8
73.9
44.3
LP2-B4
W
11.3
2.11
9.40
11.6
22.1
2.25
1.58
6.26
57.0
16.2
3.74
104
84.2
52.4
LP2-C1
W
10.7
2.16
8.87
8.45
27.8
2.08
0.61
4.52
67.0
16.6
4.71
109
83.8
52.0
LP2-C2
W
10.2
2.30
9.17
8.21
22.6
2.12
0.94
3.72
82.3
17.1
6.74
111
85.3
52.5
LP2-C3
W
11.1
2.22
9.30
9.28
29.8
2.17
0.63
3.51
68.0
17.1
6.80
106
86.9
52.4
LP2-D3
W
11.7
2.26
9.77
17.9
62.9
2.90
2.06
5.00
82.3
16.6
7.71
108
85.4
51.6
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
LP2-A1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Trace Elements (ppm) Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Yb
Lu
Hf
Ta
Tl
Pb
Th
U
W
6.00
1.01
6.52
1.46
4.52
0.70
4.70
0.73
6.44
0.84
0.71
22.5
16.0
4.69
LP2-A2
W
6.31
1.06
6.80
1.52
4.64
0.72
4.80
0.75
6.26
0.83
0.43
17.9
15.4
4.42
LP2-A3
W
6.85
1.15
7.36
1.64
5.04
0.78
5.24
0.81
7.04
0.92
0.50
21.8
16.9
5.07
LP2-A3
G
6.71
1.12
7.09
1.56
4.69
0.71
4.66
0.72
5.53
0.79
0.39
16.5
12.7
3.83
LP2-A3
C
5.98
1.00
6.31
1.39
4.20
0.63
4.23
0.65
5.40
0.79
0.55
18.5
14.7
4.79
LP2-B1
W
5.70
1.04
6.75
1.59
4.63
0.69
4.70
0.74
6.44
0.82
0.46
17.3
14.9
4.50
LP2-B2
W
6.65
1.22
7.98
1.88
5.48
0.81
5.57
0.88
7.78
0.95
0.59
41.6
17.9
5.52
LP2-C1
W
6.95
1.18
7.53
1.69
5.23
0.81
5.46
0.85
7.47
0.95
0.63
18.8
18.1
5.46
LP2-C2
W
6.90
1.18
7.53
1.69
5.20
0.80
5.40
0.85
7.48
0.95
0.58
18.8
18.1
5.43
LP2-C3
W
6.96
1.18
7.57
1.69
5.21
0.81
5.42
0.85
7.41
0.95
0.54
19.0
17.9
5.40
LP2-D3
W
6.74
1.16
7.42
1.66
5.17
0.80
5.41
0.85
7.46
1.01
0.54
19.0
18.4
5.53
RI
SC NU MA D PT E CE AC
PT
LP2-A1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT TABLE 2.
LP2A3
LP2A2-2
0.0496
High
60.7
0.0496
Low
86.2
0.0297
Modal
81.3
High
75.2
0.0496
Low
84.9
0.0496
Modal
82.5
High
77.4
Low
85.3
0.0297
0.0745
Modal
79.0
0.0297
0.0745
High
73.7
Low
84.3
Modal
77.8
High
73.7
LP2A2-1
82.5
AC
Low
0.0297
0.0297
0.0745
0.0745
0.0297
Modal
77.8
0.0297 0.0496 0.0297 0.0297
High
75.6
0.0496
0.0297
2.71 x 109 5.04 x 1010 2.28 x 109 6.20 x 109 1.03 x 1010 1.16 x 109
1.95 x 109 4.88 x 1010 1.28 x 109 4.38 x 109 9.15 x 109 6.08 x 108
5.60 x 109 6.19 x 109 3.04 x 109
3.85 x 109 5.13 x 109 2.66 x 109
1.68 x 109 3.95 x 109 5.12 x 109
1.07 x 109 3.17 x 109 4.63 x 109
0.0745
0.0297
N/A
N/A
PT
81.3
1.60 x 109 1.20 x 1010 9.63 x 108 2.15 x 109 1.59 x 109 6.20 x 108
RI
Modal
2.50 x 109 1.30 x 1010 1.35 x 109 3.18 x 109 2.81 x 109 1.07 x 109
Decom. Rate (MPa s-1)
SC
0.0496
NVF (cm-3)
NU
88.2
NmV (cm-3)
MA
LP2B2
Low
D
LP2C2-2
2nd Mode (mm)
VeT %
PT E
LP2D2
1st Mode (mm)
Density Class
CE
Unit
N/A
18.9 28.9 4.7 17.0 19.7 12.5 7.4 14.4 18.2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights
Plinian eruption column to the development of magmatic and phreatomagmatic pyroclastic density currents, and lithic-rich density currents during late-stage caldera collapse.
PT
decompression rates, a
RI
deepening of the fragmentation surface and the development of pyroclastics density currents.
AC
CE
PT E
D
MA
NU
SC
evolution of caldera-forming, Plinian eruptions.