The KLL Auger spectrum of manganese

The KLL Auger spectrum of manganese

J 3*c I Nuclear Physics A92 (1967) Not to be reproduced by photoprint THE KLL AUGER of Physics Received E RADIOACTIVITY or microfilm and...

342KB Sizes 12 Downloads 80 Views

J

3*c

I

Nuclear

Physics

A92 (1967)

Not to be reproduced

by photoprint

THE KLL AUGER

of Physics

Received

E

RADIOACTIVITY

or microfilm

and

and Astronomy,

Abstract: The KLL Auger spectrum decay of 55Fe. The measured The relative intensities of the with the theoretical values of line intensities the agreement

@ North-Holland without

SPECTRUM

Y. Y. LUI Department

139-144;

written

Publishing

Co., Amsterdam

permission

from the publisher

OF MANGANESE

R. G. ALBRIDGE Vanderbilt 26 August

University,

Nashville,

Tennessee

f

1966

of manganese (Z = 25) was measured from the electron capture energies do not agree with values calculated semi-theoretically. groups of lines KL,L,, 3 and KL,, 3Lz, a agree within error limits Asaad and of Mehlhorn and Asaad; however for the individual is not good.

55Fe [from 54Fe(n, ATOMIC PHYSICS

y)l; measured Mn measured

I K-A”~~~. Enriched EK.A”~~~, IK_A”~~~.

EK-A~~~~,

target.

1. Introduction In previous publications ‘*‘) f rom this laboratory we have reported on the K-Auger spectra of elements in the region of Z = 26 to Z = 33 in order to help define clearly the differences which exist between experimental and theoretical energies and intensities. The present study of the K-Auger spectrum of manganese (Z = 25) is a continuation of this work. For a recent summary of experimental and theoretical K-Auger studies see ref. 2). 2. Experimental

procedures

The Vanderbilt iron-free, double-focussing spectrometer was used. The spectrometer was originally described by Baird et al. 3), and its application to low-energy Auger studies has been discussed in refs. ‘g2). In the present work, as in the previous low-energy studies, batteries provided the spectrometer current. The Geiger counter with post-acceleration, originally described by Mehlhorn and Albridge 4), has also been discussed in refs. ’ 22). In the work reported here accelerating potentials of z 5 keV were used in conjunction with zapon counter windows of z 50 of z 98 “/d Pgicm’ (cut-off energy of % 3 keV) to obtain window transmissions throughout the K-Auger spectrum. The spectrometer source material was radioactive 55Fe which produces manganese K vacancies by electron capture. The activity was electroplated onto 25 pm thick platinum foils from z 1 ml of a solution made by mixing 33 ml of a saturated (NH,), C20, with 0.4 ml of 3 M H,SO,. The plating solution has been described earlier by Maletskos and Irvine 5). t Work supported

by a grant

from

the National 139

Science

Foundation.

140

Y.

A small amount

of radioactive

Y.

LUI

“Co

AND

R.

G.

ALBRIDGE

was mixed with the 55Fe so that the 7.3 keV

conversion line in the 57Co decay could be used to determine the approximate shape of the low-energy lines. This procedure, which is reported in our previous papers refered to above, is necessary because the instrumental resolution is not sufficient to separate essential

the Auger lines and a graphical separation must be accomplished. It is to determine the shape of the Auger lines before the analysis is undertaken

and the 7.3 keV conversion line provides an initial approximation of this shape. Since the line shapes are affected by source mass, it is best if the 55Fe and 57Co activities are electrodeposited simultaneously so that the source is homogeneous. Unmixed sources of 58Co, 6oCo (they are cheaper than 57Co) and 55Fe were plated at different pH values to determine the optimum pH for the mixed-source deposition. A pH of 5 was chosen, but during the plating the pH was varied back and forth on both sides of this value so that the deposition of the cobalt and iron were alternately favoured. Thus, if the sources were not uniform, they at least would probably have alternate layers of cobalt and iron activity. Several sources were produced and studied and the data presented here are those obtained from one of the best sources. This source was heated in a Bunsen flame to a faint red to remove extraneous mass. Attempts to produce sources by vacuum vaporization from an electrically heated tungsten boat were unsuccessful. 3. Results and discussion The manganese K-Auger spectrum is shown in fig. 1. The background, consisting of natural background plus the low-energy tail of the iron K-Auger spectrum which lies at slightly higher energy, has been subtracted. The shape of the tail from the iron spectrum was determined by analysing the iron spectrum in the same manner as was the manganese spectrum (described below). We estimate that the uncertainty introduced by the background could cause an error as large as 25 % in the measured intensities of the weakest manganese Auger lines. The dotted lines in fig. 1 are the results of the graphical analysis. The basic line shape used for this analysis was that of the 7.3 keV conversion line in the 57Co decay but this shape was altered, in a manner described previously ‘), to account for the differences in electron scattering and instrumental line width at different electron energies. The contribution from natural line widths is negligible compared to that from scattering and instrumental effects. Many different attempts to resolve the spectrum were made before the results shown in fig. 1 were obtained. These results are consistent in that the sum of the individual lines is the same as the experimental spectrum except in the region of the tail of the KL,L, line. To illustrate this one discrepancy we show as a dotted line in fig. 1 the standard line in the position of the KL,L, Auger line. It is seen that the tail of the experimental line is too small. This discrepancy could be eliminated by altering slightly the background and/or tails of the higher-energy lines. Although such a change would increase by a large fraction the area of the KL,L, line, it would have

KIJ.

AUGER

SPECTRUM

141

Y.

142

Y.

L”I

AND

R.

G.

ALBRIDGE

negligible effect on the areas of the other lines. Furthermore, since the line shapes are the same, their areas are proportional to their heights. Thus, rather than attempting to obtain a proper fit for the tail of the KL,L, line, we have chosen to take peak heights rather than areas as a measure of the transition intensities. We estimate that the uncertainties in the intensities of the individual lines obtained % for the KL,L,, KLL,L,, and KL,L, lines and in this way could be as large as “zi _ from + 25 % to f 50 % for the others. However, since one of the largest contributions to these uncertainties is introduced when the close-lying lines are graphically resolved, the relative intensities of the line groups KL,L,,3 and KL.,,,L,, 3 are measured to a higher precision (standard deviation of about & 25 %). The spectrometer was energy-calibrated by means of the 7.3 keV conversion line in the decay of 57Co. The energy of this line was measured ‘) to be 7.278kO.006 keV but was later 2, revised to a value of 7.300f0.006 keV. The standard deviations of the measured energies of the present work are z +0.2 %. The energies are given relative to the Fermi level since the work function of the aluminium spectrometer tank (assumed to be 4 eV) has been added to the measured kinetic energies. TABLE

Experimental

and theoretical

Transition

Energy exp.

KLL

energies

and relative

Relative cal. “) 4948 5050 5088

8.6 17 13

KL,L, KL,L, KL,L,

5191&g 5205k6 5225h8

5164 5186 5206

11 82 7.4

have been normalized

KLL Auger

8.6

1 3o 100

to 100 for the KL,,,L,,,

transitions

intensities

theor.

exp.

4958*8 5065&7 5102&7

intensities

of the manganese

(eV)

KL,L, KL,L,

The relative

1

intensities

6.9 28 9 1 8.6 79 I 12

theor.

“) 6.9

“)

8.2

37

37

100

100

group.

“) Semi-theoretical values of Axelson et al. IS) b) Deduced by linear interpolation of the values in ref. s). “) Deduced by linear interpolation of the values in ref. “).

The results are presented in table 1. Also shown for comparison are calculated energies and theoretical intensities. The calculated energies were obtained by the Uppsala group using the semi-theoretical method of Hiirnfeldt, Fahlman and Nordling 6, but using new binding energies ‘). The agreement between the calculated and experimental energies is not good +. The relative intensities have been normalized to a value of 100 for the KL,, 3 L,, 3 group. The theoretical values were deduced by linear interpolation of the values of Asaad ‘) and of Mehlhorn and Asaad ‘). Only the values calculated by these authors with the use of the transition amplitudes of Rubenstein and Snyder lo) are shown t See note added

in proof

KLL AUGER SPECTRUM

here because

those calculated

with other transition

143

amplitudes

either

do not span

the region of Z = 25 or differ so markedly from the experimental values that a comparison is meaningless. The theoretical intensities published by Asaad and Burhop ’ ‘) also differ greatly from the experimental values presented here. To obtain the theoretical values shown in table 1 it was necessary

to interpolate

between

values at Z = 18 and

Z = 36. We estimate that this interpolation could introduce uncertainties of the order of 15 ‘A. The agreement between the experimental and theoretical values is well within the limits of errors for the groups of lines in one configuration. When the intensities of the individual lines are compared the agreement is not as good, in some case being outside the limits of error. Mehlhorn and Asaad 9, did not publish individual line intensities, thus only their group intensities can be compared.

TABLE 2 Comparison

of relative

intensities

Transition

of iron KLL Experimental this work

KL,L, KL,L, KL,L, KLJ-2 KL,L, KLJ+

The

earlier

work

was performed

1.9 19 11 i 11 II I 12

at higher

lines to those relative

‘)

work

I)

6.4 6.4 23 8.9 I 32 8.4 83 1 100 8.4

3o 100

resolution

work

intensities

previous

1.9

of previous

and

is considered

to be more

accurate.

As mentioned above, the KLL Auger spectrum of iron was also analysed in this work. A comparison of the intensity results of this analysis with the previous results of Mehlhorn and Albridge ‘) obtained at higher resolution and, hence, higher accuracy is shown in table 2. The agreement is good for the three main groupings and is within + 25 % for the individual lines except for the weak KL,L2 and KL,L, transitions. This agreement is evidence that the error limits assigned to the manganese Auger intensity data in table 1 are reliable. The work here points up the need for more detailed theoretical and experimental intensity data in this region of Z. Note added in proof Working in cooperation with K. Siegbahn et al. we have used the Uppsala 30 cm iron-free spectrometer to remeasure the KL,Lr, KL,L,, KL2L3, and KL,L, energies and obtain values of 4961, 5068, 5204 and 5227 eV with error limits of about + 2 eV. A work function correction of 4 eV has been added. Chemical shift effects of several eV were observed.

144

Y.

Y.

LUI

AND

R.

G.

ALBRIDGE

References I) W. Mehlhorn

and R. G. Albridge, Z. Phys. 175 (1963) 506 R. E. Johnston, J. H. Douglas and R. G. Albridge, Nuclear Physics A91 (1967) Baird, Nall, Haynes and Hamilton, Nucl. Instr. 16 (1962) 275 W. Mehlhorn and R. G. Albridge, Nucl. Instr. 26 (1964) 37 C. J. Maletskos and J. W. Irvine, Jr., Nucleonics 14 (1956) 84 0. Hornfeldt, A. Fahlman and C. Nordling, Ark. Fys. 23 (1962) 155 K. Siegbahn et al., Nova Acta Regiae Sot. Sci. Upsaliensis, to be published W. N. Asaad, Nuclear Physics 66 (1965) 494 W. Mehlhorn and W. N. Asaad, Z. Phys. 191 (1966) 231 R. A. Rubenstein and J. N. Snyder, Phys. Rev. 97 (1953) 1653; R. A. Rubenstein, Ph. D. thesis, University of Illinois (1955) 11) W. N. Asaad and E. H. S. Burhop, Proc. Phys. Sot. 71 (1958) 369 12) Axelson ei al., private communication to R. G. Albridge (July 1966) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10)

505