The Los Angeles La Brea Station by PETER
J. IOVIN ad
ANTHONY
LUMSDEN
preface This
article
a part
gives a description
of the overall
Southern
rapid
California
architectural of Kaiser portion
Rapid
Engineers
philosophy
and
employed
The
basic station
an origin
travel,
Travel-time
considerations
program.
to the nature
and
the
engineering
and
consisting The first
and station
second
Many
of these
portion
design
describes
same factors stations
patrons
to the system, developed
bus transfer stations
in the urban be
capacity.
center
will
Recognizing careful
However,
and
govern
Therefore,
accommodated
only in the manner
screening
community.
certain
Selection
area.
spacing of station
factors
with
the
automobile parking.
Urban
more
than
pedestrian to
stations
in and
at suburban concentrations
at suburban
interference
ex-
on walk-in
access and circulation
heavier
For
access to bring
locations,
sidewalk
ant1
flow
or
it is apparent that each station size reconsideration in its layout and development.
since
can be illustrated
the site elements
by a typical
are common
to all,
station
and
vary
in which they are accommodated.
to provide
adjacent
service Station
are more widely spaced
will depend
In all cases, one of the most important requirement
speed.
it is
modes
factors,
individual
plan
location.
site development.
upon
Conversely,
undue
most of these considerations
site development
surrounding
in nature,
adequate
vehicle
be much
by other
of these service
individual
element.
without these
system
rely heavily
such as the CBD
an important
needs
centers.
and thus require
areas
passengers.
becomes
must
of the
origin
in the urban
the service
of the area, i.e., whether of the location
a balance
largely
the most important
satisfies
by station
on average
upon
stations,
densely
density
influenced
influence
stations
suburban
location
and character
relative
predicted
that suburban
than destination
relating
The
by several factors,
area, the accessibility
is also materially
has been
ample,
is dictated
How well a particular
is the most significant location
the
planning,
is
by the
La Brea station.
or destination
of surface
quires
the entire
location
is service.
of an area is related
must
The
which
Angeles
Considerations
of which
result
District.
station
for Los
was performed by a joint venture Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall.
Daniel,
for
La Brea
proposed
deals with the general
of the Hollywood
General
system
Transit
design of the facilities
of this article
features
of the Hollywood
transit
areas,
a pleasant
Landscaping visually
aspects
surrounding dividing
the overall site to the surroundings.
501
can
of site development
for both the transit assist
large
in
areas
accomplishing to add
is the
patron this
character,
and by and
Peter J. Iovin
and Anthony
Lumsden
Access and site circulation are important in all stations, and vital in suburban areas. Access to the site from the surrounding area is best provided where several routes and entry points can be developed. This will reduce conflict with other traffic during peak hours, and also facilitate movement of transit oriented traffic. These considerations are also improved for the private automobile where site access is not made directly from major arterials, but rather from secondary streets where some queuing capacity can be provided. However, a large percentage of transit patrons will utilize the feeder bus system to reach the stations. Bus operations are best accommodated on the major arterials where local service is also required and where greater street width and capacity permit easier bus operation and better scheduling. Therefore, station sites must be easily accessible from major arterials and as close to them as practicable to provide direct routes and avoid delays in bus operation. Within the site, passenger safety and convenience are best served if the various feeder modes are physically separated from each other, and from pedestrian circulation. Also, passenger loading and unloading must be as convenient to station entrances as possible. This is generally accomplished by providing off-street bus loading areas at one side of the station complex, adjacent to the street and automobile loading areas, with short-term parking for “kiss and ride” patrons on the opposite side of the station. This short-term parking area must be separated from the long-term parking areas and also have a separate vehicle entrance to avoid traffic conflict. Further, pedestrian access to these areas should not cross vehicle circulation patterns. Long-term parking areas must accommodate both vehicular circulation seeking a parking stall and pedestrian circulation leading to the station entrance. The patterns must be arranged to minimize conflict, improve safety, and to reduce delay. This is best accomplished with multiple vehicle entrances leading directly to circulation aisles, and with wheel bumpers between parking aisles spaced adequately to permit pedestrian circulation between parked automobiles rather than in the drive aisles. These pedestrian aisles should lead to a central walkway leading directly to the station.
PETER J. IOVIN
is Project
Engineers-Daniel,
Mann,
Manager
for the joint venture
Johnson and
Mendenhall,
the Southern California
Rapid Transit
elor of Science
in civil engineering
degree
and is a member of the Institute of Naval
Architects
transportation tion Agency
and Marine
projects
related
in Washington,
and the Port Authority
District.
from
Rutgers
Bay Area
Trans-Hudson
University
and the Society
He has been involved in
to the National the
to
He received a Bach-
for Rapid Transit Engineers.
of Kaiser
consultants
Capital
Rapid
Transporta-
Transit
District,
system in the New York City
area.
502
Journal of the Franklin Institute
Los Angeles
La Brea Station
At each station, space should be provided for a paved pedestrian area around the station. This space will alleviate pedestrian congestion and cross movements adjacent to the station entry during peak hours.
Station Design Stations are conceived to be incorporated into the community environment in a positive manner with the ability to be a strong design element adding visual scale to the neighborhood. The transit system may either blend, complement, or contrast without being obtrusive, with the surroundings both initially and in the future. The multi-level concourse platform systems will allow for extensions, equipment additions, station enclosure and potential use of air rights around and over the station. The basic function of the station is to accomplish a transfer between various travel modes for large numbers of people in the most direct manner, conveniently and quickly. A certain degree of standardization will establish an identity for the transit system as a whole and enable patrons to find their way easily, even in stations new to them. Standardization of certain elements throughout all stations is also necessary from the standpoint of economy and function. Continuity is achieved by the use of special materials, certain standard items of equipment and prefabricated units, and similar orientation of spaces and their relationships in all stations. The best solutions are repeated where applicable and form the basis of the system. Site conditions, location, r.o.w. structure type, and passenger volumes result in variations in the facilities within the framework of these established standards. Station areas basically related to passenger movement are platforms, concourse area, and horizontal and vertical connections between these areas and the street or buildings. Visual connection between spaces and elements of the station have been given a high priority. Open mezzanines which bridge the platforms present both horizontal and vertical views to orient the passenger; high-ceilinged platform spaces without obstructions reduce the sense of enclosure and, in subway facilities, a labyrinth of passages and spaces should be avoided. Glassed access bridges afford visual openness in areas connecting
ANTHONY Urban tects
J.
Design and
Daniel,
engineers
Architecture is a
LUMSDEN, for
degree
member
Royal Institute
of the
of from
RIBA, Mann,
is Director Johnson
Los Angeles. the
He
University
Royal Australian
and
of
Architecture Mendenhall,
received
a
Bachelor
of Sydney, Australia, Institute
and archi-
of Architects
of and and
of British Architects.
Vol. 286, No. 5, November 1968
503
Peter
J. Iovzn
concourse
and
Anthony
and platforms
assist the movement ness and feeling passenger
of safety,
lated primarily movement
to be cyclic variations
and glassed
through
a rigorous are
A feeling relating
analysis
of the
of the station
tial that the transit
as part
facilities,
of the city. A major
articu-
definition
achieved
sized to allow
passenger-
of spaciousness,
achieved
of the stations,
and is the basis of the facilities factor.
Skylights,
trees, and landscaped
internal
also The
the areas
to functions
the determining
area afford views of buildings,
in passenger-recognition awareness
and width
They
to his aware.
and confusion.
to another,
and with some nodal
and discontinuous.
sensibilities
stations.
any apprehension
spaces are adequately
in height
has been developed Human
separation These
ground
areas and contribute
one area of the facility
by vertical
and lighting.
and above
between
thus reducing
from
by volume
design.
in the aerial
of the passenger
proceeds
through
Lumsden
organization
of the community
of
openings
plazas;
the
and landscape.
like the system as a whole,
assist
facility;
It is essen-
perpetuate
effort has been made to make the facilities
allow
the vitality
equitable
with
the rest of the city’s artifacts.
Hollywood
La Brea
La Brea midway
station
between
(Figs.
Sunset
rapidly-developing The
Station A, B) is on the San Fernando Boulevard
commercial
area is presently
and Hollywood
and apartment
served
in routing
to provide
boarding
alighting
are located
Avenue
and adjacent
passengers
have
to the station, immediate
Bus stops at the station
in an area of
close
to the station
which
have
easier and safer access to the station. on
Hawthorne
convenient
access
in Hollywood
buildings.
by bus lines
been modified
line
Boulevard
to the
Avenue
and
But
Lakewood
to the escalators
and stairs,
station
crossing
a street.
the heavily-trafficed
La Brc;c
have been removed
from
without
so that
Avenue. Rather than surface amenity, advantage
of this entire
buildings is no
developing especially
for
tracks, the station This
earth
the street
right-of-way impossible
maintaining
is to use unretained of restricted
to the station
street
La Brea.
traffic
Since
above
the
there transit
platform
cut
wall construction
construction and natural
right-of-way
and
by carrying
method
costs required
slope,
but
this
ground
is ~tsually
buildings.
the walls vertical11
to a mezzanine
costs, level
the walls where
the earth slopes back, resulting
and maximum
38 I’eet
for below
neighboring
and its associated
vertically
area. Then
structural
the top of the rail is approximately
space created
are carried
lower plaza promenade retaining
by old one- and two-story
it reaches
existing
level. An inexpensive
because
to the platform
before
light and avoids the expensive
and traffic where
avoid the not-so-pleasant adjacent
is now occupied
of Selma
is left open to the sky (Fig. C).
admits natural
to support below
site, which
at the termination
requirement
a conventional subway station, with ver)’ little to the non-transit user, it was decided to take
view by the passenger
To
K8 f’eet adj;~c.ent
there
is ;I
in minimum at pl;~cl’ot-III
level.
504
Journal
of the Franklin
Institute
Los
Angeles
La Brea
Station
Passengers have the advantage of being able to wait for their trains in the usually comfortable Los Angeles climate. For inclement weather, 200 feet of the station is covered. The open station does not require air conditioning which would otherwise be required for the high-speed trains in tubes, especially with the long tube-run under the mountains between this station and the San Fernando valley. Escalators and stairs from the upper park plaza lead directly to the ticket concourse at each end of the station (Fig. D). At the ticket concourse the commuter with a valid ticket inserts it in a turnstile and proceeds by escalators to the platform level. Ticketing areas at the ends of the platforms at the mezzanine level contain turnstiles, emergency exit gates, money changers, coin dispensers and transfer dispensers. Escalation at the ends of the platform avoids bottlenecks in passenger circulation, assist-the-passenger orientation and allows passage directly, without horizontal or vertical reversals of direction to and from destination and interface points. Ticketing at each end of the station increases station availability and facilitates passenger access. At the street and at the intermediate levels all the park plazas are accessible to the public without entering the station facilities (Fig. E). The park plazas are simply landscaped and should contribute substantially to the physical, social and aesthetic development of the neighborhood.
FIG. 4. Perspcctivc
view of the Hollywood
La Brea Station.
Peter
506
J. Iovin
and Anthony Lumsden
Jourxl
of the Franlilin
Instituk
FIG. C. Aerial view of the Station looking west.
FIG. D. La Brea Station entry from upper plaza.
Peter
J.
Zovin
and Anthony
Lumsden
,” 1,1 ..._.. _....+y
/
_.-
/G .
,i ; 8
.-
,,!
,.’,;’
I
Journal of the Franklin Institute