Vol. 34, No. 5, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
THE MECHANISM OF THE ACTIVATION Ira Department
Received
January
8. Klein
of Biochemistry,
and Jack
OF PAPAIN
F. Kirsch
University
of California,
Berkeley
14, 1969
The predominant form of inactive papain prepared by the method of Kimmel and Smith (1) is shown to be a mixed disulfide formed between a sulfhydryl group on the enzyme and cysteine. Reduction or other nucleophilic cleavage of this bond frees the active thiol of papain and stoichiometric amounts of free cysteine or cysteine whose sulfur atom is cova {zntly bound to the activating nucleophile. It is shown specifically that K CN activation of papain produces 14C labeled 2-iminothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (ITC) and a stoichiometric amount of free SH on the protein. Performic acid oxidation of inactive papain yields an amount of cysteic acid approximately equivalent to the quantity of ITC obtained in the cyanide activation experiment.
Crystalline generally
papain
obtained
yet
of the
been
as thiols, inactive
Three
in Fig.
Form A has been showed molar
that
sodium
ratio
as demonstrated (7,8)
have
internal
suggested activation cially
from the
prepared
mixed
fact
were
virtually
disulfide
during
the
of papain
575
has not
of activation.
enzyme on a 1: 1
course
(6) thiol
reagents. that
of activation
and earlier is bound
activated
(9) who showed identical
The
procedure
the the
active
cyanide
by carbonyl
of Sluyterman
is
of Neumann --. et _.., al (5) who
Morihara
that
(4).
mechanisms
activated
to it
B in which
to inhibition
by experiments of papain
(Na3P03S) bound
(1)
have been made are shown dia-
the presumed
chromatography.
structure
sensitive
which
borohydride by their
by the experiments
reversibly
hemithioacetal
particularly
with
phosphorothioate
for
or sodium
suggestions
supported
by Sephadex
argued
(2,3),
and Smith
of the enzyme is promoted
of the enzyme obtained
1 together
and became
of Kimmel
Activation
form.
cyanide
form
established.
grammatically
by the method
in an inactive
by such reagents nature
prepared
papain Inactive
workers as an is form
the kinetics
to those
exhibited
and cysteine.
Glazer
C is
of
by an artifiand Smith
(4)
Vol. 34, No. 5, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Inactive
Active
-CN
\
OH
CN-
XJ I
+ CN-X w
C Figure 1. Previously suggested structures of B, (Ref. 6) ; and C, (Ref. 9)) XH = cysteine or The mode of activation of the enzyme species. Morihara (6) for structure B is shown together
did
look
formic
for acid
such a mixed oxidation
considerably
less
The results form of papain
is
disulfide
by analyzing
of the enzyme but than
the
thiol
titer
reported
herein
indeed
a mixed
inactive
titrable water
in the
thiol
per mole
to remove
sodium
phosphate
hr with
a final
absence
free buffer
(10).
Protein
that formed
activator
dialyzed
Activation
cysteic
from lots
cysteine
extensively
and the enzyme.
than
against in 0.01
was carried
by the method
out x
per-
inactive
SCA and 7DB.
and had less
was determined
576
after
were generally
that
of enzyme and K14CN of 3.6
concentration
acid
the predominant
was dissolved
The enzyme was assayed
1o-3 y respectively. IgelstrBm
enzyme.
or cystine
at pH 6.8.
concentration
of the
(Worthington
of protein)
cysteine
quantities
disulfide
of added
for
found
demonstrate
Methods rmd Materials--Papain were
inactive papain: A, (Ref. 5); unidentified inactivating by cyanide suggested by with those presumed for A and C.
Both 0.07
lots moles
distilled M EDTA-0.01
M
at 25°C for
4-5
10V4 2 and 1.0 x of Kirsch
by using
and
~~~~~ 51,000
(11).
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 34, No. 5, 1969
Gel filtration
was done on a 17 x 1 cm column
M ammonium acetate Thiol
a Packard
2,4
Tricarb acid
papain
buffer
with
Model
and 8 hrs
oxidized
(14).
from
cysteic
acid
using
a 25mm UM-10 membrane. Model tal
120 Amino Acid Readout
Cysteic Analyzer
2-Iminothiazolidine-4-carboxylic tography this
system
compound
was carried
column
of Bio
Rad Agl-X8
papain
was put
on the
to elute
the protein
was applied 0.09
et _al mm
(OH-),
200-400
in 1 c NH40H.
and excess
ammonia
ITC from
was separated with
Model
CRS 1OAB Digi-
(15). using
the paper
An aliquot
and isolation
of
on a 1 cm x 1 cm of K
30 ml of distilled
14
CN activated
water
a NaCl gradient
CN: ITC was eluted
chroma-
was used
(0-0.15!)
at 0.06
M - and CN- at
-M NaCl.
Results and Discussion--Fig. profile
of a 0.5 ml aliquot
Materials
and Methods.
new radioactivity with
excess
In-
a Beckman/Spinco
chromatography
and then
AIM-2,
fitted
identification
mesh.
containing
ultrafilter
was detected
exchange
8CA)
pestle.
protein
using
standards
Further
(16).
out by ion
column
to separate
Soluble
acid
of Bradham
a teflon
an Infratronics
to known
in
(lot
Manual
with
1 ml capacity
with
(13)
sodium citrate
pH 2.2
was determined
fitted
and compared
System
fitted
Diaflo acid
residue
dilutor-Instruction
by centrifugation.
an Amicon
solution
lyophillized with
homogenizer
was removed
1 ml/min.
0.4 urnmoles of papain
was extracted sample
0.01
Spectrometer.
soluble
recommended
was about
scintillation
Scintillation
The partially acid
rate
G-10 with
(12).
was done on about
a Potter-Elvehjem
material
reagent
a toluene-ethanol
oxidation
and cysteic
5) using
soluble
in
of Sephadex
The flow
Ellman’s
3003 Liquid
(Beckman/Spinco
part
as the eluent.
was counted
Performic for
pH 6.8
was titrated
Carbon-14
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
protein.
and the protein
of a papain
The last
containing The first peak.
2 illustrates
peaks (I)
solution
Peak
(III)
appear
and smaller
The middle
the
one (II)
577
one is
filtration
activated
contains which
gel
as described
unreacted
are due to the coincident
corresponds
elution
with
in
cyanide.
Two
cyanide
reaction
the
void
to a new species
volume
Vol. 34, No. 5, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
80 60 I ;
40
E” 20 0
6
15
10
20
Volume Eluted (ml) Figure 2. Separation of the products of the K 14 CN activation of papain by Sephadex G-10 chromatography as described in Materials and Methods; (0) protein, (a) carbon-14 and (A) thiol.
produced
by the reaction
material
was lyophillized
graphy
using
of the protein and subsequently
the system
of Bradham
The identification described
cally
in Fig.
under
explanation
3 where
is shown
react 14
enzyme with
with
the
is
thus thiol
sulfur
about
thiol
14
result
I,
from would
peak
chromato-
as
only
peak is
based
activating labile
cyclizes
nucleophile
must
Attack
cysteine. would
14 C while about
even if
peak
lead
of
to inactive
all
I has only
40 mumoles,
in this
the protein
9 mumoles.
although
coefficient.
was obtained
to approximately
578
species
to pro-
to 14 C-B-thiocyanoalanine.
activity that
papain
ITC (17).
on the extinction
catalytic
be equal
of
shown diagrammati-
inactive
disulfide
converted
50 mumoles
the graph
the
atom on the
cysteine
is
The latter
C than
of protein
CN- induced
evident
chromatography
with
to give
in the protein
100 mumoles
titer
to react
atom of the mixed
contains
of the maximal
of this
experiments
the sulfur
site
The titratable
It
has more
the active
Peak II
are over
cyanide
of these
preferentially
CN at the other
latter
as ITC by paper
exchange
enzyme and 6-thiocyanoalanine.
peak II
This
and Methods.
the conditions Since
identified
by ion
straightforward
duce the active
the activator.
et F”?” al (16). ..,-
was supported
in Materials
The most
with
were
0.5 mole/mole
there About
85%
experiment. active, protein.
It
Vol. 34, No. 5, 1969
therefore clusion ments
BIOCHEMICAL
follows
that
has been
drawn
(4,9,18).
not
all
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
the papain
previously
molecules
by others
The unactivatable
are
activatable.
on the basis
protein
This
of different
may represent
products
con-
experiof partial
autolysis. The values cysteine titer
produced of the
performic only
shown
acid
during
analyzer
scheme given
Table
Papain
in Fig. in which
I.
Comparison acid (ITC)
Lot
acid
were
#
column
to protein
0.45,
0.51,
cannot
the inactive
of Thiol Produced
amount
exclude
papain
7DB
equal
These from
of these
to the
latter
cysteic
thiol
values acid
experiments
in mixed
are
produced
support mechanism
disulfide
of
on the
material
a more complicated
is bound
of modified
2, 4, and 8 hrs
of contaminating
linkage
the of to
Titer and 2-Iminothiazolidine-4-carboxylic by the K 14CN Activation of Papain.a
Thiol
ITC
p;FOlr8&
8CA
amounts
for
and 0.51.
the results
3, they
the
ratios
separation
of a small
Although
that
are approximately
due to the incomplete
the oxidation.
activation
cleavage
Cysteic
oxidation
qualitative
amino
I demonstrate
by cyanide
enzyme.
acid
in Table
P;FOK%
%
%
40.5
52.5
43.3
56.2
56.0
a.Based on protein concentration the maximum obtainable activity.
61.0
as determined
579
from
absorbance
at 280 mu and
Vol. 34, No. 5, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
N III, /NH: s-s
ic
coo-
CZN-
SH + S,
-
CH2-C(-l cool H H ‘N’ *p -QNH s’ \
Figure
labile
cysteine
forms
the
through
active
of external
cysteine
to form the
dithio
bridges
remains
a thiol
site.
change
it
Reaction
3.
of cyanide
group
Activation as shown
active
in the
different
would
in Fig. It
site.
or not
this
papain.
that
proceed
3 followed has been
inactive
from
then
enzyme can be broken
to be seen whether
with
I ,CH CH2 lcoo-
which
eventually
in two steps;
by an internal
shown that
without
loss
property
is
release
disulfide
one of the
internal
of activity
(19))
related
ex-
but
to the activation
process. The mixed
disulfide
streptococcal
protease,
is
with
associated
disulfide Further
formed
in which
the inactive
binding
related
papain
a volatile form
from human plasma
experiments
and the apparent
form of inactive
but
as yet
of the enzyme
mercaptalbumin to the reaction
of activators
is analogous
will
cation.
580
with
unidentified
(ZO),
of papain
of a
mercaptan
and with
and cysteine
be reported
that
the mixed
(21).
with
in a later
carbonyl
reagents
communi-
Vol. 34, No. 5, 1969
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ACKNOWLEDGVENTS
We are grateful helpful
to Drs. J. Drenth, J. N. Jansonius, and R. Koekoek for
discussion of this problem.
This research was supported by National Institutes
of Health, Grant
GM12278and National Science Foundation Grant GB4606.
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18.
19. 20. 21.
Kimmel, J. R., and Smith, E. L., J. BioZ. Chem. 207, 515 (1954). Chem. 238, 165 (1963). Sanner, T., and Pihl, A., J. Biot. Smith, E. L. and Kimmel, J. R., in Boyer, P. D., Lardy, H., and Myrbgck, K The Enzymes, Vol. 4, Academic Press, New York, 2nd ed., p. 133 (260). Glazer, A. N., and Smith, E. L., J. BioZ. Chem. 240, 201 (1965). Neumann,H., Shinitsky, M., and Smith, R. A,, Biochem. 6, 1421 (1967). Morihara, K., CT. Biochem. (Tokyo) 62, 250 (1967). Bergmann, M., and Ross, W. F., J. BioZ. &em. 111, 659 (1935). Bergmann, M., and Ross, W. F., J. Biol. Chem. 114, 717 (1936). Sluyterman, L. A. AE., Biochem. Biophys. Acta 139, 430 (1967). Kirsch, J. F., and Igelstrllm, M., Biochem. 5, 783 (1966). Glazer, A. N., and Smith, E. L., J. BioZ. C&em. 236, 2948 (1961). Ellman, G. L., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82, 70 (1959). Hall, T. C., and Cocking, E. C., Biochem. J. 96, 626 (1965). Hirs, C. H. W., J. Biol. Chem. 219, 611 (1956). Hirs, C. H, W., Moore, S., and Stein, W. H., J. BioZ. Chem. 235, 633 (1960). Bradham, L. S., Catsimpoolas, N., and Wood, J. L., Anal. Biochem. 11, 230 (1965). SchUber, I. A., Kawohl, M., and Hamm,R., Ber. 84, 571 (1951). Bender, M. L., Beg&-Cant&, M. L., Blakely, R. L., Brubacher, L. J., Feder, J., Gunter, C. R., Kkzdy, F. J., Killheffer, J. V., Marshall, T. H., Miller, C. G., Roeske, R. W., and Stoops, J. K., J. Am. Chem. Sot., 88 5890 (1966). Neumann,H., IsmeZ J. C%m. 5 87~. (1967). Ferdinand, W., Stein, W. H., "andMoore, S., J. Biol. Chem. 240, 1150 (1965). King, T. P., J. BioZ. Chem. 236, PCS (1961).
581