Vol.
39,
No.
BIOCHEMICAL
1,197O
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE UNDEGRADED POLYPEPTIDE CHAIN OF YEAST HEXOKINASE John
R. Pringle
The Biological Laboratories, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
Harvard 02138
University
Received February 6, 1970
Summary Commercial preparations of yeast hexokinase are contaminated with a trace of at least one proteolytic enzyme. This contaminant will digest the hexokinase in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and a reliable molecular weight can be obtained by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis only when specific steps are taken to prevent this proteolysis. When appropriate precautions are taken, this technique yields a value of about 51,000 for the polypeptide chain molecular weight of yeast hexokinase. A similar value is obtained by gel filtration in 6M guanidine-HCl. Introduction A species generally
accepted
hexokinase
in the
isolation
seemed
possible
hexokinase
for
attack
in
and that
this
problem.
possibility,
the
enzyme 50,000
25,000
is of
the
ultimate
chain
with
smaller
possesses
46
illustrate
but
a sinSince,
known to be a problem. this
components
and also
reported
(6,7).
enzyme
a molecular
The experiments
of yeast
have
subunit
in spite
seems
subunit
daltons
proteases
products,
about
two laboratories
per
fact
a polypeptide
of
polypeptide
native
by yeast
breakdown
this
the
glucose
that
50,000,
circumvent
ultimate
and characterization
is
proteolytic
weight
However, that
site
in addition,
confirm
as the
indicating
binding
about
a molecular
(1,2,3,4,5).
evidence gle
with
of
(8,9),
of yeast weight
observed efforts
presented
it
of
were (4,8,9)
here
a significant
to seem to
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 39, No. 1, 1970
danger
attending
the
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNlCATlONS
use of SDS-polyacrylamidea
gel
electro-
phoresis. Materials
and Methods
Yeast 6309395
hexokinase
and 63592961,
Calbiochem tion.
was purchased
(lot
Other
from
8550211,
proteins
Sigma
by Dr.
Weber.
Reagents
electrophoresis
incorporating
on a .9 x 80 cm column 6M guanidine-HCl by Fish,
and alkylated Preparatory
to
.09M tris-HCl, at
100°;
conducted -Results
ICH2COOH
alkylation, .003M
at
Gel
SDS-polyacrylamide et al
(Bio
Gel
All
before
EDTA, pH8.0,
containing
was added
to
with
essentially
as
samples
were reduced
to the were
column.
dissolved
5.5M
.14M,
and
eluting
application samples
Mann,
was performed
ASM),
protein
(111,
(10).
from
filtration
protein
2-mercaptoethanol
in
guanidine-HCl
and incubation
37O overnight.
and Discussion As expected
hexokinase If,
(12).
were supplied
and Osborn
2-mercaptoethanol),
et -- al
with
for
as "Ultrapure"
of Agarose
(without
standards
by Shapiro,
purification.
purifica-
and were kindly
of Weber
was purchased
further
further
and procedures
modifications
Guanidine-HCl
described
(lo),
(lots
and from
weight
were as described the
used without
6787660),
used as molecular
by Weber and Osborn
gel
(lot
Boehringer
and was used without
as described Klaus
from
(8,9),
tested
commercial
are contaminated
to a solution
of hexokinase
tris-HCl,
.OOlM
toethanol
are added
a The abbreviation
all
EDTA,
with in buffer
preparations
of yeast
proteolytic
activity.
(.4mg/ml
in
. 2M NaCl,
pH 7.6)
at 25O,
to 1% each,
a rapid
and extensive
used is
SDS (sodium 47
dodecyl
.03M
SDS and 2-mercap-
sulfate).
proteolysis
Vol. 39, No. 1, 1970
ensues
BIOCHEMICAL
unless
proteolysis
specific
weight
forms
steps
revealed
is
this
3min
exposure
are:
to 100°
and mercaptoethanol:
(b) inhibitor
used as described
in
addition
the
hexokinase
followed with
of
of hexokinase phoretic
about
of about the
region
both
band
under
material
the
If just
bands
none
of
are
conditions
of
that
gel) weight with
No material weight between it
the
little
of
is
con-
digestion an electro1,
is obtained.
80% of the observed
in a
(10,11,14)
of
molecular
weights
is
observed
in
of
25,000.
Since
chains
seems very
52,000
to
in
at least
links
prior
guanidine-HCl,
5, Figure
observed
(13;
solution
is applied,
stained
with
immediately initial
SDS
Methods, -an SDS solution. Each
into
gel
to a
solution fluoride
5.5M
of them
I presume
should
be
unlikely
that
can be other
than
a
represents
the
un-
this
hexokinase.
treatments at
sample
by inactivating
used,
weight
of yeast the
urea
mini-
of the
as described
20,500.
chain.
continued
hot
to a molecular
of molecular
monomer
in
to a molecular
and disulfide
polypeptide
degraded
enzyme
containing
on the
and about
non-covalent
single
tion
a major
corresponding
destroyed the
to that
Minor
32,000
any
similar
corresponding 52,000.
the
addition
rapidly
if
(by densitometry
position
of
(c)
works
sufficiently
can occur;
pattern,
protein
9.2M
presumably
pattern
this
but
through
protease
in
minutes
and alkylation
treatments
taminating
several
buffer,
by reduction
of these
In
in
then
effective
phenylmethanesulfonyl 9) for
molecular gel
following of the
The
subsequent
(a> subjection
SDS and mercaptoethanol; not
dialysis
the found
treatment
this.
of higher
in
immediately
proteolytic
to prevent
Treatments
proteolysis
the
taken
components
patterns.
mizing
the
are
by a replacement
by smaller
electrophoretic
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNlCATfONS
(a)-(c)
25O after
the 48
is addition
applied,
but
incuba-
of SDS and mercap-
Vol. 39, No. 1, 1970
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
BSA
2
I 0.3
6 04
1 0.5 06 * Mobility
OJ
08
I
Figure 1. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of yeast hexokinase protected (gel a) and unprotected. (gel b) against proteolysis in SDS solutiof;. Electrophoresis was From bottom to top of the gels as pictured. The "Minor Bands" in gel a are indicated by arrows. The exact form of the standard curve to the left of fumarase is not clear from these data; the two lines indicate the limits. BSA is bovine serum albumin: ATCase C and R the catalytic and regulatory chains of E. coli aspartate transcarbamylase.
toethanol to
gel
to the b, FLgure
disappearance
solution
1 (Boehringer,
of
and Calbiochem
hexokinase
the higher
enzymes)
apparently
occurs
incubation
of
only
in buffer,
lot
63093951,
molecular
is
observed.
after
the
such a hexokinase
addition solution
49
weight This
a pattern or with
a complete
components wholesale
of the in buffer
similar
(Sigma degradation
SDS, as a 13hr at O",
fol-
Vol. 39, No. 1, 1970
lowed
BIOCHEMICAL
by treatment a.
(a)
or (b),
that
of gel
Further
will
be presented
elsewhere.
Confirmation
of
by investigation
pletely (151,
should
the
polypeptide series
of
the
disulfide
an accurate
chain
peptide
the
6M com-
chains
and extensively
carboxy-
protein's
behavior
of its
individual
(12),have
shown for
correlation
weight
of hexokinase
observed
an elution
exists
and position
Methods,
between
50,000
The earlier
their
elution
2b).
a
be-
of elution
d,
misleading unit
of the the
fact
was ob-
material
electrophoreses in
Figure
was run
2a reveal
a strict
from
the
column
Again
the
hypothesis
hexokinase
corres-
has a molecular
and their that weight
supported.
this chain
that
peak
with
position
results for
the
to a molecular
arrows
1, gel
seems strongly
column,
A main
gel
at the
of yeast
63592961,
Some smaller
on electrophoresis.
due to proteolysis that
(Figure
Figure
polypeptide
on the
corresponding
taken
chain
lot
2a was obtained.
seen in
of migration polypeptide
was run
SDS-polyacrylamide
of material
same bands
(Boehringer,
position
51,000
as well.
on samples
in
of Figure
of about
I suggest
in
between
et al
molecular
filtration
lengths
that
profile
of about
of the
was obtained
to eliminate
bonds,
to
process
thought
was reduced
19 proteins
weight
mental
sample
Fish,
with
the
gel
is
Indeed,
served
rate
degradation
interactions
as described
pondence
on this
hexokinase
similar
column.
prepared
the
a pattern
during
chains.
When a sample
elution
yields
for
solvent
a function
tween polypeptide from
this
to destroy be strictly
results
behavior
non-covalent
and since
methylated
these
Since
all
still
information
of its
guanidine-HCl.
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
indicating enzyme
must
of molecular
these 50
results
a smaller
funda-
surely
have been
weight
about
were obtained
50,000. by in-
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 39, No. 1, 1970
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
4A”’ - 1 .*’
65
4 Molecular
Weight
(IO-‘)
Figure 2. Gel filtration of hexokinase in 6M guanidine-HCl. A. Elution profile. Blue Dextran and DNP-alanine were included as internal standards in each run. Small arrows across the top indicate sites from which samples for SDS-gels were taken. B. Standard Curve (from Rosenbusch & Weber, in preparation). kdist is the distribution coefficient (see reference 12); that for GluDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; hexokinase is shown by the arrow. Mb, myoglobin; ATCase, see Figure 1. vestigators cation avoid
of hexokinase, this,
countered fects.
who were
indicates
aware of the problem
of proteolytic
and who were taking
considerable
the extreme
in attempting I suggest
SDS, as noted
to avoid
also
above,
difficulty
that
the
obligates
phoretic
technique
controls
such as (a>-(c),
completely enhancement
which
modifipains
may be en-
such proteolytic of proteolysis
one who uses the SDS-gel
on a previously
untested This
above. 51
also
to
protein minimizes
efby
electro-
to perform the
pos-
Vol. 39, No. 1, 1970
BlOCHEMlCAL
sibility
that
some rare
cubation
usually
protein
employed,
(10).
These
results
of the
technique
for
ported
by others
(10,11,14).
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
will
as already
do not,
of course,
molecular
weight
not
be denatured
noted
by the
in-
by Weber and Osborn
negate
the
reliability
determinations,
as re-
Acknowledgements --The possibility that proteolysis was occurring in SDS solutions originally emerged in discussions with Dr. Rudolf Weil. I also thank Dr. J. P. Rosenbusch for the use of his column and his calibration data, and Dr. Klaus Weber and Professor Guido Guidotti for their most appreciated material and intellectual support. This work was supported by United States Public Health Service Grant HE-08893 and by National Science Foundation Grant GB-6360 (Guide Guidotti).
References A., Stellwagen, E., and Schachman, H.K., Fed. Proc., -.20, 387 (1961). 2. Kenkare, U.W., and Colowick, S.P., J. Biol. Chem., 240, 4570 (1965). J., Schulze, I.T., Gooding, R.H., Womack, F.C., and 3. Gazith, Colowick, S.P., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 151, 307 (1968). 4. Easterby, J.S., and Rosemeyer, M.ATB.S. Letters, 5, 84 (1969). N.R., Derechin, M., and Barnard, E.A., Biochem., 5. Lazarus, 7. 2390 (1968). s:, Ricard, J., Borel, M., and Got, C., Eur. J. 6. Noat, ll-, 106 (1969). Biochem., Colowick, S.P., and Womack, F.C.., J. Biol. Chem., 244, 774 7. (1969). 8. Schulze, I.T., and Colowick, S.P., J. Biol. Chem., z, 2306 (1969). 9. Lazarus, N.R., Ramel, A.H., Rustum, Y.M., and Barnard, E.A., Biochem., 5, 4003 (1966). and &born, M., J. Biol. Chem., 244, 4406 (1969). 10. Weber, K Vinuela, E., and Maizel, J.V.,iochem. 11. Shapiro,'i.L., 1.
12. 13. 14. 15.
Ramel,
Fish,~g~~~~~~~~~'~n~a~~~r~~g~~~'J. Biol. . Fahrn&D.E., and Gold, A.M., J. Am. Chem. Sot., (1963). Dunker, A.K., and Rueckert, R.R., J. Biol. Chem., 5074 (1969). Tanford, C., Advan. Protein Chem., 23, 121 (1968). --
52
Chem., -85, 244,
997