The microbiome of a striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded in Portugal

The microbiome of a striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded in Portugal

Accepted Manuscript The microbiome of a striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded in Portugal Filipa Godoy-Vitorino, Arnold Rodriguez-Hilario, ...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 52 Views

Accepted Manuscript The microbiome of a striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded in Portugal Filipa Godoy-Vitorino, Arnold Rodriguez-Hilario, Ana Luísa Alves, Filipa Gonçalves, Beatriz Cabrera-Colon, Cristina Sousa Mesquita, Pedro Soares-Castro, Marisa Ferreira, Ana Marçalo, José Vingada, Catarina Eira, Pedro Miguel Santos PII:

S0923-2508(16)30096-1

DOI:

10.1016/j.resmic.2016.08.004

Reference:

RESMIC 3534

To appear in:

Research in Microbiology

Received Date: 5 May 2016 Revised Date:

20 July 2016

Accepted Date: 23 August 2016

Please cite this article as: F. Godoy-Vitorino, A. Rodriguez-Hilario, A.L. Alves, F. Gonçalves, B. CabreraColon, C.S. Mesquita, P. Soares-Castro, M. Ferreira, A. Marçalo, J. Vingada, C. Eira, P.M. Santos, The microbiome of a striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded in Portugal, Research in Microbiologoy (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2016.08.004. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

For publication

2

The microbiome of a striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded in

3

Portugal

4

Filipa Godoy-Vitorinoa, Arnold Rodriguez-Hilarioa, Ana Luísa Alvesb, Filipa Gonçalvesb,

5

Beatriz Cabrera-Colona, Cristina Sousa Mesquitab, Pedro Soares-Castrob, Marisa Ferreirab,c, Ana

6

Marçalod, José Vingadac,e, Catarina Eirac,d, Pedro Miguel Santosb*

SC

RI PT

1

a

Microbial Ecology and Genomics Lab, Department of Natural Sciences, Inter American University of

7

b

Department of Biology and Centre for Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), University of

9

Minho, Campus de Gualtar 4710-087 Braga, Portugal

10 11

M AN U

Puerto Rico, Metropolitan Campus, P.O. Box 191293 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919-1293

8

c

Portuguese Wildlife Society (SPVS), Quiaios Field Station, Apartado 16 EC Quiaios, 3081-101 Figueira da Foz, Portugal

12

22 23 24 25 26 27

Department of Biology and CESAM, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar 4710-087 Braga, Portugal

E-mail addresses: [email protected] (F. Godoy-Vitorino), [email protected] (A. Rodriguez-Hilario), [email protected] (B. Cabrera-Colon), [email protected] (A.L. Alves), [email protected] (F. Gonçalves), [email protected] (C.S. Mesquita), [email protected] (P. Soares-Castro), [email protected] (M. Ferreira), [email protected] (A. Marçalo), [email protected] (J. Vingada), [email protected] (C. Eira), [email protected]* (P.M. Santos) *Corresponding author

EP

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

e

AC C

14

Department of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

TE D

d

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 28

Abstract Infectious diseases with epizootic consequences have not been fully studied in marine

30

mammals. Presently, the unprecedented depth of sequencing, made available by high-throughput

31

approaches, allows detailed comparisons of the microbiome in health and disease. This is the

32

first report of the striped dolphin microbiome in different body sites. Samples from one striped

33

female edematous dolphin were acquired from a variety of body niches, including the blowhole,

34

oral cavity, oral mucosa, tongue, stomach, intestines and genital mucosa. Detailed 16S rRNA

35

analysis of over half a million sequences identified 235 OTUs. Beta diversity analyses indicated

36

that microbial communities vary in structure and cluster by sample origin. Pathogenic, Gram-

37

negative, facultative and obligate anaerobic taxa were significantly detected, including

38

Cetobacterium, Fusobacterium and Ureaplasma. Phocoenobacter and Arcobacter dominated the

39

oral-type samples, while Cardiobacteriaceae and Vibrio were associated with the blowhole and

40

Photobacterium were abundant in the gut. We report for the first time the association of

41

Epulopiscium with a marine mammal gut.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

29

The striped dolphin microbiota shows variation in structure and diversity according to the

43

organ type. The high dominance of Gram-negative anaerobic pathogens evidences a cetacean

44

microbiome affected by human-related bacteria.

45

Keywords: Cetacean; Striped dolphin; 16S rRNA; Microbiota; Metagenomics

46

1. Introduction

AC C

47

EP

42

The integrity and ecological sustainability of marine ecosystems are under increasing

48

threats mainly due to long-term consequences of climate change, habitat degradation and human

49

impact [1,2]. Marine mammal species are top predators and have long life spans. Often, they

50

need to cope with exposure to a variable combination of environmental stressors (e.g. xenobiotic

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3 pollutants) and pathogens [3]. Therefore, marine mammals can be considered prime sentinel

52

species of aquatic ecosystem health. In fact, the low resilience of marine mammal species results

53

from their low fecundity rate and their position at the top of food webs, which makes them more

54

susceptible to many human-induced pressures [4]. In Europe, there is growing concern about the

55

current health status of marine mammal populations. Significantly, a decline in some coastal

56

species such as the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) was registered [5–7], including the

57

population of the Iberian Atlantic coast, where a new porpoise ecotype was recently proposed [8].

58

Likewise, the health status of striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) populations is of great

59

concern, particularly the Mediterranean population, considering their very high mortality rates

60

during Morbillivirus (MV) outbreaks [9–11].

M AN U

SC

RI PT

51

Information on microbiological infections in cetaceans worldwide is critical for

62

understanding epidemiology in their populations, as well as warning about ocean health changes,

63

even more so in light of additional non-infectious aggressions mainly due to human activities,

64

that already render these populations susceptible to disease. In some reports, the death of

65

stranded dolphins has been associated with viruses (in addition to MV outbreaks), bacteria, fungi

66

and parasites. In striped dolphins, these included bacteria such as Brucella affecting the central

67

nervous system [12], fungal yeast such as Cryptococcus gattii associated with pulmonary disease

68

[13] and parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii in cerebral toxoplasmosis [14]. In bottlenose

69

dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), Papillomaviruses (PVs) have been associated with malignant

70

genital tumors [15]. However, information on striped dolphin health remains scarce, and most

71

available studies are based on bottlenose dolphins, the most common cetacean species in

72

captivity around the world. For example, a study performed in a bottlenose dolphin in captivity

73

over a 7-year period documented potentially zoonotic bacterial pathogens through isolation of

AC C

EP

TE D

61

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4 74

bacteria such as Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [16].

75

Microbial isolates from free-ranging bottlenose dolphins in Florida, Texas and North Carolina

76

evidenced abundant Staphylococcus spp. Contents, suggesting direct human impact [17]. In order to treat live-stranded or captive dolphins, we need to be able to assess the

78

vulnerability of free-ranging dolphin populations and to evaluate the risk of disease transmission

79

between humans and dolphins. Also, to further assess the proposed role of dolphins as

80

environmental sentinels, we need detailed characterization of the dolphin microbiota in health

81

and disease contexts. Since ~99% of all microorganisms are recalcitrant to isolation under

82

conventional laboratory conditions [18], next-generation sequencing technologies applied to 16S

83

rRNA genes have been playing a pivotal role in

84

natural ecosystems [19]. The unprecedented depth of sequencing made available by high-

85

throughput approaches allows for finely detailed descriptions of the microbiome of marine

86

mammals, and thus provides a relevant approach to environmental surveillance of the marine

87

environment. Very recently, the microbial taxonomic composition of 48 healthy bottlenose

88

dolphins (38 in captivity and 10 wild animals) and 18 California sea lions (Zalophus

89

californianus) was reported [20]. The authors found as many as 30 phyla in the dolphin

90

specimens and

91

overall bacterial taxonomic compositions of the marine mammals were distinct from dietary fish

92

and seawater. Similar findings have been reported for terrestrial vertebrate gut microbiota [21].

SC

M AN U

microbial diversity in

EP

TE D

characterization of

significant differences between wild and captive dolphins, concluding that the

AC C

93

RI PT

77

A multidisciplinary team from Portuguese and Spanish research centers was established

94

some years ago to evaluate the health status of marine mammal populations along the Iberian

95

Atlantic coast,

96

species by collecting data regarding trait history, contaminants, bacteriological and fungal

systematically

assessing population status and health of coastal cetacean

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 97

imbalances, prevalence of viral diseases, parasite load and tissue damage [22,23]. In the context

98

of this integrative approach, standardized sample collection procedures for evaluating the

99

taxonomic composition of the microbiome of cetaceans were implemented. Here,

first results

emerging from this collaborative effort are reported. Specifically, a 16S rRNA gene-based

101

Illumina MiSeq sequencing approach was used to investigate

102

composition and structure in an edematous female striped dolphin stranded along the Algarve

103

coast in Portugal.

104

2. Materials and methods

105

2.1. Sample collection

RI PT

100

M AN U

SC

microbial community

The striped dolphin sampled in the present study was stranded alive in the Algarve at

107

the Meia Praia Beach (37.115885ºN, -8,648677°E), and died shortly after the arrival of a rescue

108

team from the Marine Animal Stranding Network (coordinated by the Instituto para a

109

Conservação da Natureza e Florestas, http://www.icnf.pt/portal/icnf, Portugal, in cooperation

110

with the Portuguese Wildlife Society (SPVS)). The dead animal was taken to the Quiaios Field

111

Station in Figueira da Foz (Portugal), where the respective necropsy took place. The dolphin was

112

an immature female with a total length of 191 cm and 63.6 kg of weight. Post-mortem analysis

113

was performed within 12 h after the animal’s death according to standard protocols [24]. The

114

occurrence of gross pathologies was recorded if any evidence of pathology (lesions or abnormal

115

appearance) was found in any organ system [25]. The animal was emaciated and presented low

116

consistency of brain, liver and pancreas tissues, lung lesions compatible with pneumonia and

117

ulcerous formations in the stomach chambers.

AC C

EP

TE D

106

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6 During the necropsy, tissue and swab samples from different body sites (blowhole, colon,

119

intestine, stomach, tongue, oral cavity (mouth), duodenum, genitals) were collected in triplicate

120

and stored in RNA-Later and frozen within an hour after the necropsy at -80 °C.

121

2.2. Genomic DNA extraction, PCR Amplifications and Sequencing

RI PT

118

Total DNA extractions were done in triplicate (for each sample) using the PowerSoil DNA

123

isolation kit (MoBio). Briefly, 250 mg of tissue or 250 ml of total pellet recovered from swabs

124

(following extensive washing with saline solution) were added to powerbead tubes (MoBio). All

125

subsequent steps were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration

126

and quality of DNA was evaluated using a NanoDrop™ 1000 spectrophotometer.

M AN U

SC

122

To determine whether the extracted DNA samples included intact DNA of bacterial

128

origin, PCR amplification of the whole 16S rRNA gene was carried out using universal primers

129

27F and 1492R [26]. Due to varying PCR yields across samples, PCR reactions were pooled

130

from triplicate samples from each origin prior to sequencing.

TE D

127

The composition of microbial communities from the different striped dolphin samples

132

was assessed using primers for paired-end V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq

133

platform [27].

134

2.3. Data deposition

136 137

The sequences used in this study have been deposited with BioProject database ID

AC C

135

EP

131

PRJNA316486 in SRA with accession number SRP072736. 2.4. Sequence processing and data analyses

138

Sequencing reads were processed using QIIME [28] with strict quality and size filtering,

139

de-replication and clustering (Usearch [29]). The resulting high-quality dataset was then

140

screened for chimeric sequences and contaminant chloroplast DNA (Uchime [30]). Filtered

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7 141

sequences were used to evaluate the diversity and taxonomic composition of target samples

142

using

143

performed. Sequence binning was done using the 97% identity threshold with the Silva database

144

[31]. Data were subsampled,

145

Richness curves were built using the The chao 1 index that uses low frequency counts for

146

richness (singletons and doubletons) to estimate the number of missing species [32].

beta and alpha diversity measures and significance tests were

thus mitigating biases due to differences in sampling depth.

RI PT

QIIME 1.9.1, where all

Principal component analyses of bacterial communities from the eight body site samples

148

were compared phylogenetically using UniFrac distances [33], a β-diversity measure that uses

149

phylogenetic information to compare samples in which the distances between them represent

150

their ecological distances. The “R” Vegan package [34] was used to draw heat maps, and ggplot2

151

[35] and reshape2 [36] were used to draw dendrograms. PICRUSt (phylogenetic investigation of

152

communities by reconstruction of unobserved states) was used for functional metagenome

153

prediction, estimating gene families (KEGG KO functions) contributing to a bacterial

154

metagenome identified by 16S rRNA sequencing [37].

155

3. Results

TE D

M AN U

SC

147

In order to monitor the microbiome composition of stranded cetaceans, a standardized

157

procedure pipeline was implemented, as depicted in Fig. 1. Briefly, following cetacean stranding

158

registration, the animal is evaluated and, whenever it evidences a fresh status (time of death

159

below 24 h), samples for microbiome content evaluation are collected during necropsy.

160

Following total DNA extraction, all samples evidencing the presence of bacteria (assessed by

161

PCR amplification of the full 16S rRNA region) are then sequenced using V3-V4 16S rRNA

162

protocol on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Here, the first results of this procedure are presented.

163

AC C

EP

156

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 8 164

3.1. Community diversity and structure An initial set of 923,066 raw reads underwent strict filtering, including dereplication,

166

quality and size filtering, removing reads with poor quality scores, chimeras and chloroplasts. A

167

total of 639,116 sequences with an average read length of about 460 bp passed preprocessing.

168

The number of sequences per sample varied from a minimum of 24,083 to a maximum of

169

289,253 sequences, with an average of 79,904 sequences per sample (Table 1). Differences

170

between the total number of retrieved sequences may suggest significant variations in bacterial

171

richness and abundance according to the sampled body site. Binning of the 639,116 sequences

172

resulted in 235 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (Table 1). All samples were rarefied to an

173

even sampling depth of 24,000 sequences prior to statistical analysis. The samples with the

174

highest number of OTUs were the oral cavity, the tongue and the blowhole (Table 1). Oral cavity

175

bacteria shared more OTUs with the tongue compared to all other body sites, followed by the

176

genital sample, which also shared OTUs with both the tongue and oral cavity (Supplementary

177

Table 1S). PCoA of UniFrac distances revealed that bacterial communities from each body site

178

segregated the duodenum and stomach from all other samples (Fig. 2). The genital sample shared

179

fewer OTUs with the other samples, and there existed community similarities between tongue

180

and oral samples as well as between colon and intestine, with the blowhole having a community

181

similar to the oral and intestinal samples (Fig. 2). The tongue, oral, blowhole and genitals

182

samples showed the highest Chao1 richness values and were separate from gut samples (Fig. 2,

183

Supplementary Fig. 1S, Supplementary Fig. 2S).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

165

184 185 186

3.2. Microbial taxonomic profiles A total of 15 phyla, with the 5 most abundant (>5%) being Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria,

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9 Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Tenericutes, were found. The remaining phyla had less than 5%

188

abundance. Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were present across all

189

samples (Fig. 3). Genitals and blowholes were the external body orifices with a dominance of

190

Fusobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria, with half of its community dominated by

191

Cardiobacteriales and Pasteurellales (~43%) (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 3S). Oral and tongue

192

samples were dominated by Proteobacterial orders Pasteurellales and Campylobacterales (~85%).

193

The stomach sample had a dominance of Tenericutes order Mycoplasmatales (~43%) followed

194

by Firmicutes, and the duodenum had a dominance of Firmicutes order Clostridiales (~98%),

195

Intestines and colon evidenced a similar community structure dominated by Proteobacteria,

196

Fusobacteria and Firmicutes. Interestingly, the amount of Bacteroidetes decreased from open

197

orifices, through the oral cavity and gut, with virtually no such taxa in the intestine or colon; the

198

opposite occurred with the Firmicutes.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

187

A total of 108 genera were detected, most of which had residual abundance (<0.5%), and

200

each sample had a dominance of different taxa; the blowhole had ~27% of uncultured

201

Cardiobacteraceae,

202

Tenacibaculum

203

Porphyromonas (~20%), Actinobacillus (15%), Parvimonas (~7%), and Ureaplasma (5%). The

204

oral cavity had dominant Phocoenobacter (~30%) and Arcobacter (24%), but also

205

Porphyromonas (~14%) very similar to the tongue’s genus profile, with a slightly higher amount

206

of

207

Peptostreptococaceae-IncertaeSedis (~98%), representing a dominance of ~40% in the stomach,

208

followed by Ureaplasma (~36%), Mycoplasma (~7%) and Helicobacter (4%). The intestine had

209

a dominance of Photobacterium (64%), Cetobacterium (20%) and Peptostreptococaceae-

TE D

199

~18%

Helcococcus.

Pasteurellaceae,

The

genital

~9%

sample

had

Actinobacillus

and

Fusobacterium

5%

(25%),

AC C

EP

and

uncultured

Phocoenobacter

(~52%).

The

duodenum

samples

evidenced

a

dominance

of

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10 210

IncertaeSedis (14%). The colon had a dominance of Actinobacillus (~33%), Photobacterium

211

(30%), Cetobacterium (10%) and Epulopiscium (8%) (Fig. 3). Tongue and oral cavity samples

212

apparently shared Phocoenobacter,

213

(Supplementary Fig. 4S). Shared taxa between colon and intestine included Photobacterium,

214

Actinobacillus and Cetobacterium. The blowhole shared Actinobacillus with the colon and

215

intestine (Supplementary Fig. 4S).

RI PT

Arcobacter and Porphyromonas with a genital sample

Significantly different taxa (p<0.05) included Streptobacillus, Arcobacter, Vibrio and

217

Tenacibacter in the blowhole (taxa absent in all other samples). In the colon, Actinobacillus and

218

Epulopiscium were significantly more abundant while, in the intestine,

219

damselae and Cetobacterium predominated; the stomach had Helicobacter heilmanii,

220

Mycoplasma, Ureaplasma and Paeniclostridium sordellii; in the tongue, Phocoenobacter was

221

significantly more abundant (Fig. 4). Oral samples had diverse and highly abundant taxa

222

including Campylobacter, Parvimonas, Tenacibaculum, Porphyromonas, Psychrobacter and

223

Arcobacter sp., while in the duodenum, Paeniclostridium sordellii dominated and in the genitals

224

Actinobacillus scotiae and Fusobacterium were significantly more abundant (Fig. 4).

227

M AN U

TE D

EP

226

Photobacterium

3.3. Phenotypic and metabolic inference Based on inference of taxonomic-to-phenotypic mapping of metabolism using

AC C

225

SC

216

228

METAGENassist [38], ammonia oxidizing pathways in the blowhole, sulfate reducers and

229

oxidizers in the colon, chitin degradation and denitrification in the intestine, nitrogen fixation in

230

the stomach, ammonia oxidizers and dehalogenation in the oral cavity and ammonia oxidizers in

231

the genitals were found (Supplementary Fig. 5S). As a whole, we found mostly anaerobic and

232

facultative anaerobic bacteria, and a dominance of Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria in most

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11 organs except for the duodenum and intestines (Supplementary Fig. 5S). Picrust analyses for oral

234

and gut samples revealed that taxa in these samples included metabolic pathways previously

235

associated with human diseases such as cell signaling in H. pylori infections, Tuberculosis, the

236

Vibrio chloreae cycle and immunodeficiency were significantly associated with gut samples.

237

Pathways associated with pertussis and Huntington’s disease were significantly associated with

238

taxa found in the oral samples (Supplementary Fig. 6S).

239

4.

SC

Discussion

RI PT

233

Studies on the impact of microbial pathogens in dolphin strandings have relied on

241

cultivation techniques, PCR and clonal sequencing; however, very few studies have focused on

242

the inventory of bacteria in different body sites using next-generation sequencing, a thorough and

243

sophisticated approach to understanding the overall health status of the animal. Here, the first

244

microbiome inventory of a striped dolphin, a small oceanic delphinid species, is presented. One

245

of the potential bottlenecks of this approach was the high risk of sample contamination with

246

external sources during stranded animal handling up until sample collection. Nonetheless,

247

bacterial inventory of the striped dolphin specimen under analysis included a variety of bacteria

248

in a range of 15 phyla,

249

conducted on bottlenose dolphins along the US Coast [20], although with a different relative

250

abundance of the main phyla. This corroborates the validity of

251

sample collection from stranded specimens. Compared to a large marine mammal study by Bik

252

and co-workers [20], we confirm that oral samples were richer than gut samples, as were those in

253

the blowhole and genitals.

TE D

M AN U

240

AC C

EP

also reported in a more extensive microbiome composition survey

implemented procedures for

254

Most of the bacteria within the 15 phyla changed their relative abundance in each organ

255

type, but overall, we found a dominance of mostly facultative, anaerobic, Gram-negative taxa,

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12 some of which are host-adapted and

could be traced to human infections. Some of these

257

dominant bacteria included common residents of the mucous membranes of animals, such as

258

Pasteurellaceae OTUs, which can be commensals, as well as Actinobacillus and

259

Phocoenobacter, which were recently recovered from marine mammal carcasses and were

260

related to septicemia [39]. Actinobacillus were also found in high abundance in gastric rectal

261

samples from healthy dolphins, but Phocoenobacter is apparently absent in the healthy animals

262

[20]. These taxa were found in the striped dolphin in very high abundance, corresponding to

263

nearly half of the bacterial community in the blowhole and colon as well as in the tongue and

264

oral samples. We found several obligatory anaerobic bacteria such as Arcobacter, a genus

265

associated with human and animal illness [40] as well as

266

hemolytic bacteria [42,43] and Tenacibacullum (bacteria common in the GI tract and fish

267

pathogen [44]) are all obligatory anaerobic bacteria. Campylobacter of human and livestock

268

origin present in animal oral samples, are regarded as zoonotic bacteria, causing gastroenteritis

269

and septicemia and occasionally other conditions in marine mammals [45]. Cardiobacteriaceae

270

OTUs were also found in the blowhole, tongue and oral cavity of the dolphin, and these

271

anaerobic taxa are associated with bacteremia and wound infections in humans [46]. The fact

272

that these taxa are anaerobic and have entry portals mostly in the gut, and are found at a highly

273

oxygenized area of the animal such as the blowhole, indicates

274

stranded striped dolphins from Italy were diagnosed with cardiovascular pathologies, including

275

ventricular dilation associated with hypoplasia of the tricuspid chordae and valvular fibrosis,

276

ventricular hypertrophy and myocarditis; however, no pathogens were found [48]. Additionally,

277

another study reporting the first case of sepsis in a live-stranded sperm whale

278

pathogen Edwardsiella tarda, relating these bacteria to stranding and death of the animal [49].

M AN U

SC

RI PT

256

AC C

EP

TE D

marine sediments [41]; Helcococcus -

sepsis [47]. Recently, nine

found the

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13 The abundance of Cardiobacteriaceae OTUs in the dolphin may suggest a microbial role for

280

similar cardiopathologies. Other obligate Gram-negatives such as Cetobacterium were abundant

281

in the colon and intestines and had already been isolated from other marine mammals [50].

282

Pathogenic Vibrionaceae were also abundant in the colon and intestines (Photobacterium), as

283

well as Vibrio, a known cytotoxic bacteria, in the blowhole [51]. Gastric inflammation has been

284

considered a cytologic marker of systemic illness in dolphins; however, no clinically significant

285

findings of cultured bacteria and fungi have been reported, except for a case of biliary cirrhosis

286

produced by Campula spp [52]. In agreement with this, the presence of Ureaplasma in the

287

stomach of healthy asymptomatic bottlenose dolphins was previously reported [20]; thus, the

288

impact of these organisms in the health of dolphins remains unknown. Another taxon that may be

289

a biomarker for disease is, for instance, genital Fusobacterium, a Gram-negative, obligatory

290

anaerobic species that is a common resident of the GI tract, but that possesses a number of

291

pathogenic traits with relevance to gut diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease [53].

292

Interestingly, we found Epulopiscium, a large symbiotic bacteria found in the tropical surgeon

293

fish [54], probably helping fish to break down algal nutrients in the diet. This is the first report

294

of Epulopiscium in the gut of a marine mammal.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

295

RI PT

279

In conclusion, the main goal of this work was to reveal, with high resolution, the microbiome of a critically ill female edematous striped dolphin.

297

diverse community, mainly dominated by Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria of human origin.

298

The veterinary bibliography on marine mammal research regarding infectious diseases in

299

strandings reveals a remarkable scarcity of comprehensive literature about diseases/disorders

300

affecting different body systems of dolphins, and these data are quite limited in marine mammals

301

inhabiting Portuguese and northern Spanish waters. Data exist on the effects of accidental

AC C

296

As a result, we

report a

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14 capture [55], the prevalence of some parasite species [56,57] and pollutants [5,22,23] in marine

303

mammal populations. However, studies on infectious disease epidemiology in cetacean species

304

are lacking despite recent reports of re-emerging or new infectious diseases in marine mammal

305

populations, with epizootic and potential zoonotic consequences.

RI PT

302

Our in-depth study using next-generation sequencing technologies is the first bacterial

307

metagenomic survey of an edematous striped dolphin to show that the analyzed animal

308

harbored multiple bacterial pathogens resembling those present in humans. Whether human

309

activities

310

light on the cetacean pathogenic microbiome that critically impacted a striped dolphin on the

311

Iberian Peninsula. Detailed epidemiological models using next-generation sequencing and

312

metagenomics as tools to predict new outbreaks and facilitate their control are warranted.

SC

306

M AN U

actually contribute to such a burden remains to be clarified. This study sheds new

313

315

Acknowledgements

TE D

314

The authors would like to acknowledge Jörg Becker and João Sobral for

sequencing

services provided at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência and to Ricardo Araújo for preliminary

317

DNA extraction tests.

EP

316

This work was supported by project CetSenti RECI/AAG-GLO/0470/2012 (FCOMP-01-

319

0124-FEDER-027472), FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) and FEDER-COMPETE (POFC), the strategic

320

program

321

through the FCT I.P., by the ERDF through the COMPETE2020 - Programa Operacional

322

Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and through PhD grants (SFRH/BD/76894/2011,

323

SFRH/BD/98558/2013) attributed to P.S-C and C.S.M, respectively. The work was also

324

supported by the FCT through CESAM UID/AMB/50017/2013 co-funded by the FCT/MEC and

AC C

318

UID/BIA/04050/2013 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007569) funded by national funds

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15 325

FEDER, within PT2020 and Compete 2020 (C.E.) and grants SFRH/BD/30240/2006 (M.F.) and

326

SFRH/BPD/64889/2009 (A.M.).

327

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

329 330

References

331

[1]

SC

Dayton PK. The importance of the natural sciences to conservation: (an American Society of Naturalists symposium paper). Am Nat 2003;162:1–13.

332 333

RI PT

Conflicts of interest

[2]

Marques M, da Costa MF, Mayorga MI de O, Pinheiro PR. Water environments:

M AN U

328

334

anthropogenic pressures and ecosystem changes in the Atlantic drainage basins of Brazil.

335

Ambio 2004;33:68–77. [3]

2011;48:676–690.

337 338

Bossart GD. Marine mammals as sentinel species for oceans and human health. Vet Pathol

[4]

TE D

336

Peltier H, Baagøe HJ, Camphuysen KCJ, Czeck R, Dabin W, Daniel P, et al. The stranding anomaly as population indicator: the case of harbour porpoise Phocoena

340

phocoena in North-Western Europe. PLoS One 2013;8:e62180. [5]

and ecological factors related to trace element levels in harbour porpoises (Phocoena

342

phocoena) from European waters. Mar Environ Res 2007;64:247–266.

343 344

Lahaye V, Bustamante P, Law RJ, Learmonth JA, Santos MB, Boon JP, et al. Biological

AC C

341

EP

339

[6]

Mahfouz C, Henry F, Courcot L, Pezeril S, Bouveroux T, Dabin W, et al. Harbour

345

porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) stranded along the southern North Sea: an assessment

346

through metallic contamination. Environ Res 2014;133:266–273.

347

[7]

Siebert U, Wünschmann A, Weiss R, Frank H, Benke H, Frese K. Post-mortem findings in

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 16 348

harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the German North and Baltic Seas. J Comp

349

Pathol 2001;124:102–114.

350

[8]

Fontaine MC, Roland K, Calves I, Austerlitz F, Palstra FP, Tolley KA, et al. Postglacial climate changes and rise of three ecotypes of harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena, in

352

western Palearctic waters. Mol Ecol 2014;23:3306–3321.

353

[9]

RI PT

351

Van Bressem M-F, Duignan PJ, Banyard A, Barbieri M, Colegrove KM, De Guise S, et al. Cetacean morbillivirus: current knowledge and future directions. Viruses 2014;6:5145–

355

181. [10]

1993;22:524–528.

357 358

Aguilar A, Raga JA. The Striped Dolphin Epizootic in the Mediterranean Sea. Ambio

M AN U

356

SC

354

[11]

Raga J-A, Banyard A, Domingo M, Corteyn M, Van Bressem M-F, Fernández M, et al. Dolphin morbillivirus epizootic resurgence, Mediterranean Sea. Emerg Infect Dis

360

2008;14:471–473.

361

[12]

TE D

359

González-Barrientos R, Morales J-A, Hernández-Mora G, Barquero-Calvo E, GuzmánVerri C, Chaves-Olarte E, et al. Pathology of striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba)

363

infected with Brucella ceti. J Comp Pathol 2010;142:347–52. [13]

coeruleoalba). J Wildl Dis 1985;21:443–446.

365 366 367 368

Gales N, Wallace G, Dickson J. Pulmonary cryptococcosis in a striped dolphin (Stenella

[14]

AC C

364

EP

362

Di Guardo G, Proietto U, Di Francesco CE, Marsilio F, Zaccaroni A, Scaravelli D, et al. Cerebral toxoplasmosis in striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) stranded along the Ligurian Sea coast of Italy. Vet Pathol 2010;47:245–253.

369

[15] Rehtanz M, Bossart GD, Doescher B, Rector A, Van Ranst M, Fair PA, et al. Bottlenose

370

dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) papillomaviruses: vaccine antigen candidates and screening

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 17 test development. Vet Microbiol 2009;133:43–53.

371 372

[16] Chan OS, Mukherjee J, Yuen CS. Microbial flora of blowhole samples in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus aduncas-type) in Hong Kong, 1993– 2000. Proc.

374

32nd Annu. Conf. Int. Assoc. Aquat. Anim. Med., Tampa, FL: 2001, p. 24–25.

375

[17]

RI PT

373

Buck JD, Wells RS, Rhinehart HL, Hansen LJ. Aerobic micro-organisms associated with freeranging dolphins in coastal Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean waters. J Wildl Dis

377

2006;42:536–544. [18]

culture in a simulated natural environment. Science 2002;296:1127–1129.

379 380

Kaeberlein T, Lewis K, Epstein SS. Isolating “uncultivable” microorganisms in pure

[19]

M AN U

378

SC

376

Brooks JP, Edwards DJ, Harwich Jr. MD, Rivera MC, Fettweis JM, Serrano MG, et al.

381

The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.

382

BMC Microbiol 2015;15:66. [20]

Bik EM, Costello EK, Switzer AD, Callahan BJ, Holmes SP, Wells RS, et al. Marine

TE D

383 384

mammals harbor unique microbiotas shaped by and yet distinct from the sea. Nat

385

Commun 2016;7:10516.

evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008;6:776–788.

387 388

[22]

(Phocoena phocoena) from Portugal (western Iberian Peninsula). Environ Pollut

390

2016;210:293–302.

391

393

Ferreira M, Monteiro SS, Torres J, Oliveira I, Sequeira M, López A, et al. Biological variables and health status affecting inorganic element concentrations in harbour porpoises

389

392

Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R, Gordon JI. Worlds within worlds:

EP

[21]

AC C

386

[23]

Monteiro SS, Torres J, Ferreira M, Marçalo A, Nicolau L, Vingada J V, et al. Ecological variables influencing trace element concentrations in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 18 394

truncatus, Montagu 1821) stranded in continental Portugal. Sci Total Environ

395

2016;544:837–844.

396

[24]

Kuiken T, Hartmann MG. Proceedings of the First ECS Workshop on Cetacean Pathology : dissection techniques and tissue sampling, Leiden, Netherlands: [European

398

Cetacean Society]; 1991.

399

[25]

RI PT

397

Pugliares KR, Bogomolni A, Touhey KM, Herzig SM, Harry CT, Moore MJ. Marine mammal necropsy : an introductory guide for stranding responders and field biologists.

401

Woods Hole, MA: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; 2007. [26]

1991.

403 404

Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons;

M AN U

402

SC

400

[27]

Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultrahigh-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq

406

platforms. ISME J 2012;6:1621–1624.

407

[28]

TE D

405

Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Walters WA, González A, Caporaso JG, Knight R. Using QIIME to analyze 16S rRNA gene sequences from microbial communities. Curr Protoc

409

Bioinformatics 2011;Chapter 10:Unit 10.7. [29]

2010;26:2460–2461.

411 412

[30]

Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2194–2200.

413 414

Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics

AC C

410

EP

408

[31]

Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal

415

RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic

416

Acids Res 2013;41:D590–6.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19 [32]

completeness rather than size. Ecology 2012;93:2533–2547.

418 419

[33]

Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:8228–8235.

420 421

Chao A, Jost L. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by

[34]

RI PT

417

Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’Hara R, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3-4 2016. https://cran.r-

423

project.org/package=vegan. [35]

Wickham H. ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Hadley Wickham, Springer. 1st ed. Springer-Verlag New York; 2009.

425

M AN U

424

SC

422

426

[36]

Wickham H. Reshaping Data with the reshape Package. J Stat Softw 2007;21:1–20.

427

[37]

Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene

429

sequences. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:814–821.

430

[38]

TE D

428

Arndt D, Xia J, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Guo AC, Cruz JA, et al. METAGENassist: a comprehensive web server for comparative metagenomics. Nucleic Acids Res

432

2012;40:W88–95. [39]

uteri gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Pasteurellaceae Pohl (1979) 1981

434

isolated from a harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000;50

435

Pt 1:135–139.

436 437

Foster G, Ross HM, Malnick H, Willems A, Hutson RA, Reid RJ, et al. Phocoenobacter

AC C

433

EP

431

[40]

Lee C, Agidi S, Marion JW, Lee J. Arcobacter in Lake Erie beach waters: an emerging

438

gastrointestinal pathogen linked with human-associated fecal contamination. Appl

439

Environ Microbiol 2012;78:5511–5519.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20 440

[41]

players in sulphidic habitats. Nat Rev Microbiol 2006;4:458–468.

441 442

Campbell BJ, Engel AS, Porter ML, Takai K. The versatile epsilon-proteobacteria: key

[42] Chow SK, Clarridge III JE. Identification and clinical significance of Helcococcus species, with description of Helcococcus seattlensis sp. nov. from a patient with urosepsis. J Clin

444

Microbiol 2014;52:854–858. [43]

from a human wound. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004;54:1557–1560.

446 447

Collins MD, Falsen E, Brownlee K, Lawson PA. Helcococcus sueciensis sp. nov., isolated

[44]

SC

445

RI PT

443

Småge SB, Brevik ØJ, Duesund H, Ottem KF, Watanabe K, Nylund A. Tenacibaculum finnmarkense sp. nov., a fish pathogenic bacterium of the family Flavobacteriaceae

449

isolated from Atlantic salmon. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2016;109:273–285.

450

[45]

M AN U

448

Stoddard RA, Atwill ER, Gulland FMD, Miller MA, Dabritz HA, Paradies DM, et al. Risk factors for infection with pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant fecal bacteria in northern

452

elephant seals in California. Public Health Rep 2008;123:360–370. [46]

caused by HACEK microorganisms. Annu Rev Med 1997;48:25–33. [47]

1982;31:95–104.

456 457

[48]

Scaglione FE, Bollo E, Pregel P, Chiappino L, Sereno A, Mignone W, et al. Heart pathologies in dolphins stranded along the northwestern Italian coast. Dis Aquat Organ

458

2013;107:31–36.

459 460

Nord CE. Anaerobic bacteria in septicaemia and endocarditis. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl

EP

454 455

Das M, Badley AD, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Wilson WR. Infective endocarditis

AC C

453

TE D

451

[49]

Cools P, Haelters J, Lopes dos Santos Santiago G, Claeys G, Boelens J, Leroux-Roels I, et

461

al. Edwardsiella tarda sepsis in a live-stranded sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus).

462

Vet Microbiol 2013;166:311-315.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 21 463

[50]

Foster G, Ross HM, Naylor RD, Collins MD, Ramos CP, Fernandez Garayzabal F, et al.

464

Cetobacterium ceti gen. nov., sp. nov., a new Gram-negative obligate anaerobe from sea

465

mammals. Lett Appl Microbiol 1995;21:202–206. [51]

Naim R, Yanagihara I, Iida T, Honda T. Vibrio parahaemolyticus thermostable direct

RI PT

466 467

hemolysin can induce an apoptotic cell death in Rat-1 cells from inside and outside of the

468

cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2001;195:237–244. [52]

Jaber JR, Pérez J, Rotstein D, Zafra R, Herráez P, Carrascosa C, et al. Biliary cirrhosis

SC

469

caused by Campula spp. in a dolphin and four porpoises. Dis Aquat Organ 2013;106:79–

471

84.

472

[53]

Allen-Vercoe E, Strauss J, Chadee K. Fusobacterium nucleatum: an emerging gut pathogen? Gut Microbes 2011;2:294–298.

473 474

M AN U

470

[54] Fishelson L, Montgomery L, Myrberg W, Arthur A. A unique symbiosis in the gut of tropical herbivorous surgeonfish (Acanthuridae: teleostei) from the red sea. Science

476

1985;229:49–51.

477

[55]

TE D

475

López A, Santos MB, Pierce GJ, González AF, Valeiras X, Guerra A. Trends in strandings and by-catch of marine mammals in north-west Spain during the 1990s. J Mar Biol Assoc

479

UK 2002;82:513–521. [56]

lesions in cetacean stranded on the northwestern Spanish Atlantic coast. Dis Aquat Organ

481

1998;32:227–231.

482 483 484 485

Abollo E, López A, Benavente P, Cabaleiro M, Pascual S. Macroparasites andgross

AC C

480

EP

478

[57]

Pascual S, Abollo E, López A. Elemental analysis of cetacean skull lesions associated with nematode infections. Dis Aquat Organ 2000;42:71–75.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 22 486 487

Table and Figure Legends

488

Table 1. Number of sequences and OTU estimates across body sites.

490

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the procedure outline for assessing the microbiome

491

composition of stranded cetaceans.

492

Fig. 2. Measures of microbial diversity of the eight body sites. Panel A depicts a beta

493

diversity plot based on UniFrac distances calculated on the OTU table of the eight body sites.

494

Panel B shows alpha diversity rarefaction curves for Chao1 richness estimates for each body site.

495

Fig. 3. Taxonomic distribution of the OTUs at the phylum level (panel A) and genus level

496

(panel B) for each body site. Panel A: A total of 15 phyla were detected; the five most abundant

497

(>5%) were Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Tenericutes. The

498

remaining phyla had a relative abundance below 5%. Panel B: A total of 108 genera were

499

detected, but some had only residual abundance (<0.5%).

500

Fig. 4. Genus level heat map depicting significantly different OTUs according to body site.

501

The 51 OTUs were selected after a statistical G-test comparing OTU frequencies in the sample

502

groups. Only those taxa that showed p<0.05 were selected. The dendrograms were made through

503

hierarchical clustering using the ggdendro and ggplot2 packages in R. Percentage of identity (ID)

504

of the best-hit matches of the respective representative sequences, using BLASTN analysis, are

505

indicated next to the assigned taxonomy.

506

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

489

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. Number of sequences and OTU estimates across body sites

Number

of Total number Number

sequences

of OTUs per unique OTUs sample

per sample

43,896

122

32

Colon

39,579

75

1

Intestine

74,465

54

0

Stomach

62,886

85

3

Duodenum

57,705

70

0

Tongue

47,249

149

1

Oral

289,253

156

14

Genitals

24,083

95

0

Total

639,116

235(unique)

51

M AN U

TE D EP

SC

Blowhole

AC C

of

RI PT

Sample Type

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT