The molecular mechanisms between metabolic syndrome and breast cancer

The molecular mechanisms between metabolic syndrome and breast cancer

Accepted Manuscript The molecular mechanisms between metabolic syndrome and breast cancer Yi Chen, Ya-yuan Wen, Zhi-rong Li, Dong-lin Luo, Xiao-hua Zh...

659KB Sizes 0 Downloads 69 Views

Accepted Manuscript The molecular mechanisms between metabolic syndrome and breast cancer Yi Chen, Ya-yuan Wen, Zhi-rong Li, Dong-lin Luo, Xiao-hua Zhang PII:

S0006-291X(16)30223-6

DOI:

10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.02.034

Reference:

YBBRC 35337

To appear in:

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Received Date: 11 January 2016 Accepted Date: 10 February 2016

Please cite this article as: Y. Chen, Y.-y. Wen, Z.-r. Li, D.-l. Luo, X.-h. Zhang, The molecular mechanisms between metabolic syndrome and breast cancer, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.02.034. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The molecular mechanisms between metabolic syndrome

RI PT

and breast cancer

Department of General Surgery (Breast, Thyroid and Vascular Suerery), Daping

M AN U

1

SC

Yi Chen1, Ya-yuan Wen1, Zhi-rong Li1, Dong-lin Luo1, Xiao-hua Zhang1,*

Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China

* Corresponding Author:

TE D

Xiao-hua Zhang, Department of General Surgery (Breast, Thyroid and Vascular Suerery), Daping Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing,

AC C

EP

400042, China, Tel: 86-13637970778, Email: [email protected].

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Metabolic syndrome, which is extremely common in developed and some developing countries, is a clustering of at least three of five of the following medical conditions: abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure, elevated fasting plasma glucose, high serum triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein levels. It has been

RI PT

proved that there is a strong association between metabolic syndrome and breast cancer. Metabolic syndrome could increase the risk of breast cancer and influence the prognosis of the breast cancer patients. Some characteristic of metabolic syndrome such as obesity and lack of physical exercise are all risk factors for developing breast

SC

cancer. The metabolic syndrome mainly include obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and each of them impacts

M AN U

the risk of breast cancer and the prognosis of the breast cancer patients in different ways. In this Review, we focus on recently uncovered aspects of the immunological and molecular mechanisms that are responsible for the development of this highly prevalent and serious disease. These studies bring new insight into the complex associations between metabolic syndrome and breast cancer and have led to the

TE D

development of novel therapeutic strategies that might enable a personalized approach in the management of this disease.

Keywords: Metabolic syndrome, breast cancer, obesity, type 2 diabetes, nonalcoholic

AC C

EP

fatty liver disease.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Breast cancer (BC) is perhaps the most-studied malignancy in the world. Some 1.7 million women were diagnosed with the disease in 2012, making it a global priority [1]. Although the research on the diagnosis and treatment of BC have been received intense attention, there are still some questions needed to be answered, such as which

RI PT

cancers need to be treated, who should be having mammograms, and how often, what are the possibilities, and limits, of immunotherapy, and what are the risk factors for the disease [2].

Several studies have reported that BC is associated with metabolic syndrome (MS)

SC

and insulin resistance (IR) [3,4]. It is also reported that MS is associated with a modestly increased risk of second breast cancer events and BC-specific mortality that

M AN U

is concerning due to the growing population of BC survivors and prevalence of MS risk factors [5]. Recent study shows that within the U.S. there are more than 2.4 million BC survivors with a 5-year survival rate of 88.6%. These survivors are at an increased risk of cancer recurrence, comorbidities such as diabetes, osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [6,7]. The MS is defined by a group of metabolic risk

TE D

factors that have a tendency to cluster together in one individual-obesity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and IR. These factors have been associated with several chronic diseases, especially CVD, type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

EP

(NAFLD) separately and jointly [8].

MS, a spectrum of conditions including abdominal obesity, IR, atherogenic dyslipidemia and hypertension, has been related to the risk of BC worldwide [9]. The

AC C

ORDET cohort showed that after menopause the presence of MS is associated with a 2.6 times higher BC risk compared with the absence of any components of MS. Women with MS (3 or more components) had a significantly higher risk of BC than women without MS (less than 3 components): HR 1.58 [10]. A recent meta-analysis showed that the risk of BC is 1.56 times higher in postmenopausal women with MS than in women without MS [11]. Bhandari R et al. also suggested that positive association was observed between MS and BC risk (RR: 1.47, 95% CI, 1.15-1.87; z = 3.13; p = 0.002; Q = 26.28, p = 0.001; I (2) = 69.55%). MS is associated with increased BC risk in adult women [12]. Berrino F et al. suggested that the presence of

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT MS was a major determinant of the occurrence of new BC events in a cohort of 2,092 women patients operated for BC on average 1.7 years before recruitment. The risk of distant metastases was more than double in patients with MS than in patients without any dismetabolic traits [13].

RI PT

Given that metabolic dysregulation may affect risk for recurrence of BC and onset of additional chronic disease, investigation into effective interventions for reducing MS in BC survivors is also a badly needed area of research. However, the mechanisms by which MS affects prognosis of BC patients are not clear, which might

SC

include higher sex hormone levels, higher levels of insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and chronic inflammatory status [14].

M AN U

In this review, we will discuss how the MS such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and NAFLD may contribute to the development of BC growth and influence the prognosis of BC patients mainly focusing on the linking molecular mechanisms between the MS and BC (Fig 1). Obesity and breast cancer

TE D

Obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, is associated with IR and the development of dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and ultimately type 2 diabetes. Although many metabolic abnormalities occur with obesity and type 2 diabetes, IR and

EP

hyperinsulinemia appear to be central to these conditions and may contribute to the dyslipidemia and altered levels of circulating estrogens. It has been recognized in 2001 that excess body weight increases the risk of BC in

AC C

postmenopausal women, and there is a closely association between the obesity and the risk of BC [15,16]. Obesity and carcinogenesis share 2 properties in common. On the one hand, they involve inflammatory pathways, and on the other hand, they are characterized by dysregulated metabolism [17,18]. Importantly, obesity can promote carcinogenesis through directly and indirectly pathways. The direct pathway is that the aromatase enzyme synthesizes estrogens in adipose tissue from circulating androgens, then stimulating breast cells to proliferate, and the indirect pathway is that the presence of visceral obesity impacts on cell sensitivity to insulin activity and increases synthesis of leptin by adipose tissue, which will resulting in a

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT hyperinsulinemic state and disordered mitogenic and antiapoptotic effects [19,20]. A study from U.S in 2009 found that among women who gained weight after BC diagnosis, each 5-kg gain was associated with a 13% increase in BC-specific mortality, which concluded that greater post-diagnosis body mass index and weight gain were

offer women a greater chance of surviving BC [21].

RI PT

associated with higher rates of BC mortality, hence avoidance of weight gain may

It has been deemed that obesity may affect BC prognosis through several ways. Firstly, obese women are often diagnosed with more advanced disease, such as

SC

NAFLD and Type 2 diabetes, which will probably increase the risk of liver and renal related mortality [22]. Secondly, BC progression is definitely under natural

M AN U

immunosurveillance and accumulating evidence indicates that the negative impact of obesity and MS on the function of immune system may play an aggravating role as well [23]. Thirdly, treatment may be less effective than among non-obese women affected by obesity [24]. Finally, obesity affects the level of various hormones including estrogen, insulin, and the IGF system and tumor progression [25]. It is

TE D

reported that the increase in BC risk with increasing BMI among postmenopausal women is largely the result of the associated increase in estrogens. Higher circulating endogenous estrogen increases the IR of postmenopausal BC approximately two fold

EP

[26].

Estrogens play an essential role in the progression of breast tumors. The effects of estrogen in the breast are mediated through estrogen receptor α (ERα), ERβ, and the G

AC C

protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) [27]. Classically, estrogen signaling occurs through the binding of estrogen to the ERα, leading to dimerization of ERα, translocation to the nucleus, and the regulation of gene transcription. The ER complex consisted of ERα and ERβ binds to ER response elements in the promoter regions of various ER-regulated genes, and gene transcription may be activated or repressed depending on the activators and repressors in the ER complex [28,29]. The ER is a primary target for BC treatment. The ER status of a tumor has two conditions, which are closely associated with therapeutic method. The ER status of a tumor is designated as ER negative if there is less than 10% nuclear staining for ERα

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT on immunohistochemistry. However, “ER-negative” BC cells may still express ERα at low level. In addition, ERβ expression is higher in some “ER-negative” BC cell lines than in ER-positive cell lines. Consequently, in breast cancers traditionally considered as ER negative and unresponsive to hormone therapy, the ERs may play a role in cell

RI PT

signaling, growth, and survival [30]. As BC progresses to estrogen-independent growth, the IGF-IR and the ER interact in synergistic cross-talk mechanisms, which result in enhanced activation of both receptors' signaling cascades. Cross talk between the IGF-IR and ER signaling pathway has been hypothesized as a mechanism of

SC

resistance to hormone receptor-targeted therapy [31]. IGF-II is critical in BC progression and its actions are mediated by the IGF-IR. Gene expression profiling of

M AN U

MCF-7 cells treated with IGF-I and estrogen suggested that estrogen and IGF-I signaling result in the repression of many common target genes, and for many of the genes, the estrogen- and IGF-I-mediated repression occurred independent of IGF-IR and ER signaling [32]. Therefore, because of this cross talk and independent regulation of common genes, it has been hypothesized that inhibiting IGF-IR

TE D

signaling and ER signaling would prevent BC resistance to hormone therapy, which might be an effective way to treat the BC. Altogether, these studies above indicated that there is a closely relationship between obesity and BC, and obesity can aggravate

EP

the prognosis of BC patients through various pathways. Type 2 diabetes and breast cancer IR and hyperinsulinemia are essential to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, and

AC C

several studies have focused specifically on these aspects associated with the development of BC. A case-cohort study nested in a multicentre italian cohort indicated that presence of MS was associated with increased BC risk in postmenopausal women. Among the MS, high fasting glucose was significantly associated with increased BC risk in all women [33]. The insulin is best known for its important role it plays as a homeostatic regulator of blood glucose, gluconeogenesis, and fatty acid metabolism in metabolic tissues such as the skeletal muscle, adipose tissue and liver. Recently several epidemiological studies explore the connection between type 2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT diabetes and the incidence, recurrence, and mortality of BC in women. One of the studies conducted by Cleveland RJ. et al. indicated that postmenopausal women with diabetes were at increased risk of developing BC [odds ratio (OR) = 1.35], as were those who were not of white race (such as the black race and the yellow race)

RI PT

regardless of menopausal status [OR = 3.89]. Among women, diabetes was associated with a modestly increased risk of death from all causes, an association that was stronger in women who were obese at BC diagnosis [34]. Their findings suggest that diabetes may increase incidence of BC in older women and non-whites, and mortality

SC

due to all causes [34]. In a study from Asia, a lower breast cancer-specific survival rate has been reported for diabetic versus nondiabetic women over 40 years of age at

M AN U

both 2 and 5 years postsurgery, which suggest that type 2 diabetes is an independent predictor of lower breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) and overall survival (OS) rates in Asian patients with early-stage BC [35].

IR is a pathological condition in which cells fail to respond to the normal actions of the hormone insulin. When the body produces insulin under conditions of IR, the cells

TE D

in the body are resistant to the insulin and are unable to use it effectively, leading to hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. IR is usually caused by defects in the IR signaling pathways which mediate glucose uptake and is a central characteristic of

EP

both the MS and type 2 diabetes. Insulin and the IGF family classically comprise ligands including insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II. There are three receptors, the insulin receptor, the IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) and the IGF-II receptor (IGF-IIR) [36]. It is

AC C

deemed that hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia could potentially impact cancer progression through several mechanisms. First, hyperinsulinemia increases IGF-I bioavailability by increasing hepatic growth hormone receptor expression, leading to growth hormone mediated increases in IGF-I production by the liver and repressing hepatic production of IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP)-1 and -2. This increase in IGF-I could lead to increased signaling via insulin receptor isoform-A/IGF-IR hybrids and the IGF-IR. Second, insulin has a high affinity for insulin receptor isoform-A and could promote cell proliferation through its cognate receptor [37,38]. Mammographic density, which reflects cell proliferation activity in the breast, can

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT hamper the detection of BC with a mammogram. Reduced mammographic sensitivity to BC was observed in women with dense breast tissue compared with those with fattier breast tissue, due to the masking effect of dense breast tissue. There is emerging evidence that in a large sample of Korean women, IR was associated with

RI PT

mammographic dense breast, which demonstrated that IR, as a potentially modifiable risk factor, may increase BC risk, possibly through high mammographic density [39]. Other factors such as physical activity, alcohol consumption and diet, all of which affect IR, may also influence BC risk through mammographic density [40-42].

SC

Although several pathways between type 2 diabetes and BC have been identified, the precise mechanism of each pathway and the role molecules involved in the process

M AN U

play remains to be further investigated.

Other types of diseases of metabolic syndrome and breast cancer Dyslipidemia has been associated with an increased risk for developing cancer such as BC growth and metastasis [43]. It has been reported that hypercholesterolemia affects mammary tumor growth and metastasis [44]. Because apolipoprotein E (ApoE)

TE D

glycoprotein functions as a regulator of plasma lipid levels and has a role in the uptake of lipids into different tissues and in delivering cholesterol and triglycerides into cells, Alikhani et al. used the ApoE knockout (ApoE-/-) mice, which exhibit

EP

marked dyslipidemia such as elevated circulating cholesterol and triglyceride levels, to explore the role of dyslipidemia in BC growth and metastasis. They found that the hypercholesterolemic milieu in the ApoE-/- mice is a favorable setting for mammary

AC C

tumor growth and metastasis, and they deemed that cholesterol can promote tumor growth and metastasis in BC through PI3K/Akt signal pathway, and thus suggest that reducing total cholesterol levels may be an important therapeutic modality in the prevention and treatment of BC [44]. It has been proven that matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) promotes metastasis of the cancer cells. The effect of MMP-9 on the malignant progression of invasive BC promoted by membrane progesterone receptorα (mPRα) has been widely investigated, and it is recently reported that mPRα was a major marker of harmful prognosis and it promoted the expression of MMP-9 during invasion to the local lymph nodes through the pathway of PI3K/Akt in the invasive

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT BC [45]. NAFLD, which has become the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the developed world, is projected to become the leading cause of liver transplantation in the USA by 2020 [46]. Selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM)-associated

RI PT

NAFLD might be related to treatment efficacy in patients with BC because of circulating estrogen antagonism. One study aimed to investigate the relationship between NAFLD and survival outcomes in patients with BC treated with tamoxifen, finally they concluded that SERM-associated NAFLD was independently associated

SC

with improved disease-free survival (DFS) and might be useful for predicting treatment responses in BC patients treated with SERMs [47]. Some inflammatory

M AN U

factors have been suggested to contribute to the increased risk of BC progression and mortality. For instance, the NF-κB signaling pathway has been reported to take part in growth of anti-estrogen-resistant BC cells using an macrophage chemotactic factor (MCF) 7-derived cell model, whereas NF-κB signaling pathway is also activated durning the state of NAFLD [48,49]. Although it has been acknowledged that there is

TE D

a relationship between NAFLD and BC, the data from clinical observation and basic research is still insufficient. Additional studies are needed to explore the exact mechanism and signal pathway that are responsible for the effects of NAFLD on BC.

EP

Concluding remarks

MS has become a major public health problem worldwide and represents a common clinical condition in countries with a high incidence of obesity and western

AC C

dietary patterns [5]. Of all the components of MS, obesity seems to be the essential initial factor which provides a direct link between inflammation and dysregulated metabolism and has been the etiology of numerous cancers such as BC. In addition, obesity plays an important role in the regulation of estrogen biosynthesis in adipose tissue. The role of MS especially obesity in postmenopausal BC must be seen because estrogen plays a dominant role in driving this disease [14]. Due to a higher prevalence of MS in BC survivors, lifestyle interventions are badly needed to prevent chronic diseases associated with obesity. BC clinics should consider offering BC patients with MS personalised nutritional advice in order to reduce MS

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT parameters. Increasing exercise adherence is a necessary target for further research in obese BC survivors. The treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and endocrine therapy usually result in adverse effects. One important consequence of these adverse effects is a profound decline in physical activity. This is particularly

RI PT

essential because physical activity is thought to lower the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality [50]. It is reported that metabolic disease-related effects of resistance and aerobic exercise training and inform intervention programs that will optimally improve physiological and psychosocial health during cancer survivorship, and that

SC

are ultimately aimed at improving prognosis of the BC patients [51]. Guinan E et al. examined the effect of an 8-week aerobic exercise intervention on several of these

M AN U

outcomes, including body composition, the MS and physical activity in BC survivors 2-6 months post-chemotherapy. They found that those who adhered to >90 % of the supervised exercise class showed a significant decrease in waist circumference although did not elicit significant improvements in biomarkers of BC risk [52]. More importantly, it is generally recognized that regular and persistent exercise after cancer

TE D

diagnosis, even at low-to-moderate intensity level, decrease the prevalence of MS among long-term BC survivors, and then improve the prognosis of the long-term BC survivors [53].

EP

In summary, we should know which women are susceptible to BC and why those women have got BC, which would illuminate the root causes of the disease and lead to new approaches for prevention and treatment. Different molecular pathways

AC C

involved in MS and breast carcinogenesis are expected to be clearly confirmed, which would also help us to integrate them and find pivotal treatment targets.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Reference 1. 2. 3.

RI PT

4.

Woolston C. Breast cancer. Nature. 2015 Nov 18;527(7578):S101. Woolston C. Breast cancer: 4 big questions. Nature. 2015 Nov 18;527(7578):S120. Xue F, Michels KB. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer: a review of the current evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Sep;86(3):s823-35. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235-41. Calip GS, Malone KE, Gralow JR, et al. Metabolic syndrome and outcomes following early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Nov;148(2):363-77. Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics review, 1975-2004. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006. Bradshaw PT, Ibrahim JG, Khankari N, et al. Post-diagnosis physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: the Long Island Breast Cancer Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;145(3):735-42. Ferguson RD, Gallagher EJ, Scheinman EJ, et al. The epidemiology and molecular mechanisms linking obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Vitam Horm. 2013;93:51-98. Reeves GK, Pirie K, Beral V, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: cohort study. BMJ. 2007 Dec 1;335(7630):1134. Agnoli C, Berrino F, Abagnato CA, et al. Metabolic syndrome and postmenopausal breast cancer in the ORDET cohort: a nested case-control study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Jan;20(1):41-8. Esposito K, Chiodini P, Colao A, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov;35(11):2402-11. Bhandari R, Kelley GA, Hartley TA, et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased breast cancer risk: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Breast Cancer. 2014;2014:189384. Berrino F, Villarini A, Traina A, et al. Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Aug;147(1):159-65. Ross-Innes CS, Stark R, Teschendorff AE, et al. Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature. 2012 Jan 4;481(7381):389-93. Bergström A, Pisani P, Tenet V, et al. Overweight as an avoidable cause of cancer in Europe. Int J Cancer. 2001 Feb 1;91(3):421-30. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, et al. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature.

SC

5.

6.

9.

10.

11.

AC C

12.

EP

8.

TE D

M AN U

7.

13.

14.

15. 16.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

21.

22.

23. 24. 25.

RI PT

AC C

26.

SC

20.

M AN U

19.

TE D

18.

EP

17.

2008;454:436-444. Protani M, Coory M, Martin JH. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Oct;123(3):627-35. Koppenol WH, Bounds PL. Contribution to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:325-337. Khandekar MJ, Cohen P, Spiegelman BM. Molecular mechanisms of cancer development in obesity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Nov 24;11(12):886-95. Capasso I, Esposito E, Pentimalli F, et al. Homeostasis model assessment to detect insulin resistance and identify patients at high risk of breast cancer development: National Cancer Institute of Naples experience. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 14;32:14. Nichols HB, Trentham-Dietz A, Egan KM, et al. Body mass index before and after breast cancer diagnosis: associations with all-cause, breast cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 May;18(5):1403-9. Peairs KS, Barone BB, Snyder CF, et al. Diabetes mellitus and breast cancer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 1;29(1):40-6. Kroemer G, Senovilla L, Galluzzi L, et al. Natural and therapy-induced immunosurveillance in breast cancer. Nat Med. 2015 Oct;21(10):1128-38. Bray F, McCarron P, Parkin DM. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(6):229-39. Renehan AG, Roberts DL, Dive C. Obesity and cancer: pathophysiological and biological mechanisms. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2008 Feb;114(1):71-83. Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK, et al. Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Aug 20;95(16):1218-26.

27. Bartella V, De Marco P, Malaguarnera R, et al. New advances on the functional cross-talk between insulin-like growth factor-I and estrogen signaling in cancer. Cell Signal. 2012 Aug;24(8):1515-21. 28. Ariazi EA, Leitão A, Oprea TI, et al. Exemestane's 17-hydroxylated metabolite exerts biological effects as an androgen. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007 Nov;6(11):2817-27. 29. Malik S, Jiang S, Garee JP, et al. Histone deacetylase 7 and FoxA1 in estrogen-mediated repression of RPRM. Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Jan;30(2):399-412. 30. Richardson AE, Hamilton N, Davis W, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2) activates estrogen receptor-α and -β via the IGF-1 and the insulin receptors in breast cancer cells. Growth Factors. 2011 Apr;29(2-3):82-93.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

31. Fagan DH, Yee D. Crosstalk between IGF1R and estrogen receptor signaling in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2008 Dec;13(4):423-9. 32. Casa AJ, Potter AS, Malik S, et al. Estrogen and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) independently down-regulate critical repressors of breast cancer growth. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;132(1):61-73. 33. Agnoli C, Grioni S1, Sieri S, et al. Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer risk: a case-cohort study nested in a multicentre italian cohort. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0128891. 34. Cleveland RJ, North KE, Stevens J, et al. The association of diabetes with breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project. Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Jul;23(7):1193-203. 35. Chen WW, Shao YY, Shau WY, et al. The impact of diabetes mellitus on prognosis of early breast cancer in Asia. Oncologist. 2012;17(4):485-91. 36. Belardi V, Gallagher EJ, Novosyadlyy R, et al. Insulin and IGFs in obesity-related breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2013 Dec;18(3-4):277-89. 37. Rhoads RP, Kim JW, Leury BJ, et al. Insulin increases the abundance of the growth hormone receptor in liver and adipose tissue of periparturient dairy cows. J Nutr. 2004 May;134(5):1020-7. 38. Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Aug;4(8):579-91. 39. Kim BK, Chang Y, Ahn J, et al. Metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and mammographic density in pre- and postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Sep;153(2):425-34. 40. Hanna M, Dumas I, Jacob S, et al. Physical activity, mammographic density, and age-related lobular involution among premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2015 Sep;22(9):964-75. 41. Lindgren J, Dorgan J, Savage-Williams J, et al. Diet across the Lifespan and the Association with Breast Density in Adulthood. Int J Breast Cancer. 2013;2013:808317. 42. Trinh T, Eriksson M, Darabi H, et al. Background risk of breast cancer and the association between physical activity and mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Apr 2;17:50.

43. Rodrigues Dos Santos C, Fonseca I, Dias S, et al. Plasma level of LDL-cholesterol at diagnosis is a predictor factor of breast tumor progression. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 26;14:132. 44. Alikhani N, Ferguson RD, Novosyadlyy R, et al. Mammary tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis are enhanced in a hyperlipidemic mouse model. Oncogene. 2013;32(8):961-7. 45. Wu X, Sun L, Wang X, et al. Breast Cancer Invasion and Metastasis by mPRα

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

50.

51.

52.

AC C

EP

53.

RI PT

49.

SC

48.

M AN U

47.

TE D

46.

Through the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. Pathol Oncol Res. 2015 Nov 25. Mahady SE, George J. Management of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an evidence-based approach. Clin Liver Dis. 2012 Aug;16(3):631-45. Zheng Q, Xu F, Nie M, et al. Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator-Associated Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Improved Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(40):e1718. Simpson ER, Brown KA. Minireview: Obesity and breast cancer: a tale of inflammation and dysregulated metabolism. Mol Endocrinol. 2013 May;27(5):715-25. Yde CW, Emdal KB, Guerra B, Lykkesfeldt AE. NF-κB signaling is important for growth of antiestrogen resistant breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;135:67–78. Irwin ML, Smith AW, McTiernan A, et al. Influence of pre- and postdiagnosis physical activity on mortality in breast cancer survivors: the health, eating, activity, and lifestyle study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 20;26(24):3958-64. Dieli-Conwright CM, Mortimer JE, Schroeder ET, et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of combined progressive exercise on metabolic syndrome in breast cancer survivors: rationale, design, and methods. BMC Cancer. 2014 Apr 3;14:238. Guinan E, Hussey J, Broderick JM, et al. The effect of aerobic exercise on metabolic and inflammatory markers in breast cancer survivors--a pilot study. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jul;21(7):1983-92. Bao PP, Zheng Y, Nechuta S, et al. Exercise after diagnosis and metabolic syndrome among breast cancer survivors: a report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2013 Sep;24(9):1747-56.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure legends Figure 1. Diseases of metabolic syndrome influencing the breast cancer through different signaling pathways. Metabolic syndrome is a clustering of at least three of five of the following medical conditions: abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure,

RI PT

elevated fasting plasma glucose, high serum triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein levels. The metabolic syndrome mainly include obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and each of them impacts the risk of breast cancer through different signaling pathways. FPG, fasting plasma

SC

glucose; TG, triglyceride; BP, blood pressure; HDL, high density lipoprotein; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; IGF, insulin-like

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

growth factor; ER, estrogen receptor; IR, insulin resistance.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights 1.

Breast cancer is perhaps the most-studied malignancy in the world. Some 1.7 million women were diagnosed with the disease in 2012, making it a global priority. Although the research on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer has

RI PT

been received intense attention, there are still some questions needed to be answered. 2.

Obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, is associated with insulin resistance and the development of dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and ultimately type 2 diabetes.

SC

It has been deemed that obesity may affect breast cancer prognosis through several ways.

M AN U

Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are essential to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, and several studies have focused specifically on these aspects associated

EP

TE D

with the development of breast cancer.

AC C

3.