91. numkr
\‘calrne
CHEMICAL
5
THE PHOTODYNAMICS
4 February
1983
OF Z-(2’-HYDROXY-5’-hlETHYLPHENYL)-BENZOTRIAZOLE
IN LOW-TEMPERATURE S.R.
PHYSICS LETTERS
ORGANIC
GLASSES
BARBARA
FLOhl and PI.
Lkpaarrrn~t~ t of Clwnrisr~r. L’nircrsiry of hlinnesora, hlinneapolis. hlinnesota 5.i4.5.5. USA Ilrccivcd 7 Ocrobcr
1981
The non-tillic-resolved and time-resolved emission spectroscopy of 2 -( 2’-hydroxy-5’-mcthylphmyl)-benzotriazole in lowtcmpcraturc organic $ISSCS has been investigted. The observed data are consistent Gth ;Lkinetic -model that has been disCIIMXI prcviuusly
by several rcsearchrrs. Our results sugest that the estrernely efficient electronic radiationless decay of this c-trnlpound is due to an esceptionally rapid decay rate for the proton-transferred form of the fist electronically excited
singlet st3te.
2. Experimental
1. Introduction Tltc special photophysical otgwii
niolcctrlcs
properties
3s ;I result
imparted
of intranioieculsr
to
hydro-
gen btmcling
have been under investigation for over _X ?-cars [ I --_:I _ in recent years. primarily as a result of nc\x’ cspcrinlrntrrl techniques (especially picosecond
sp~‘c~roscopy).
considerable
(iw nwchanistic &II‘the ccntra1
progress
understanding
has been nxtde on
of this field
issues in this regard
has been
[S].
One
the mech-
HMPB was generously supplied at no charge by Ciba-Geigy Corporation and purified by recrystallization tbrce times from absolute ethanol. Spectroscopic solvents were reagent grade and purified by treatntent with activated
alumina (methylcyclohexane and isopentane) or by distillation from calcium hydride (Smethylpentane). Sample solutions were =104
mole/liter
anistis tlet;iils of how hydrogen bonding can enhance electronic txkttitmless Jcczty in ;i variety of molesules. e.g. SW rcfs. 14-6 J . In tilis paper we con1 inue our research 17-9 ] in
quartz
this xez
study.
by stttd\ting the low-telnper~ture
static
and
dynamic tluorcsccnie sprctroscopy of 2-(2’~hydrosy5‘-~1~sti~~ipl1~~~\.1)-b~~~z0triazole (HXlPB). HMPB. 3s iornprtred
to closely
drosy-phenyl gen bonds.
related
substi~uents
has xi esccptionally
rxliatiwiless
dwrty
prrprr the
spccrroscopy
identify
pmnd.
4s
with
efficient
nwchariisrnjs).
the rclasation
responsible
con~pwtids
and intramolecular
hydro-
electronic
We esaniine
of IlhlPB in an attempt process
for the rscrptional
or processes
properties
2-hy-
in this
to
that are
of this com-
in HAlPB and contained
optical
in sealed 1 mm
cells.
Our apparatus for variable-temperature, time- and wavelength-resolved fluorescence measurements has been described
molecular
in detail elsewhere [9]. In the present excitation is at 355 nm and emission
is monitored at variable z-1 5 mn wide regions. The experimental digital time-dependent fluorescence traces (points in the figures) were fit (solid lines in the figures) by an iterative procedure with a convolution
of the experimentally
deterntined
instrument
response function (=-5O ps full width half height) and an assumed kinetic model, see section 3. Employing this procedure we routinely achieve ~10 ps effective time resolution. see elsewhere for further details [9]. Static emission spectra (4 mn resolution) were determined with 3.55 nm. 30 ps excitation and detection by a spectrograph constructed from an HR320 (Instruments SA) polychromator with a 150 groove/ 0 009-2614/83/0000-0000/S
03.00 0 1983 North-Holland
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 94, number 5
mm holographid grating and a 1420 (Princeton Applied Research) photodiode array, PDA, with a 520 photocathode. The spectra we report have been corrected for the channel-dependent sensitivity of the PDA but not for the wavelength-dependent sensitivity of our apparatus_
3. Results and discussion 3. I. Basic photophysical
mechanism
S,z t121 se2 + hv --f s,a_
(1)
This species rapidly rearranges
by excited-state
S--II
molecular proton transfer, ESIPT, to yield a lowerenergy excited species, SJ3
intra-
(2)
512+%3-
Fig. 1 allows for the following radiative and non-radiative decay processes s, 2 + so2 + hv,
(3)
s,,
(4)
+ so3 f hv,
S,, -
The spectroscopy of HMPB and derivatives [lo--161 have been investigated by several groups. The generally accepted photophysical mechanism is closely analogous to that believed to be operating in related molecules, e.g. see refs. [2,4,S17,17]. In non-polar solvents HMPB exists predominantly in an intramolecularly hydrogen-bound form, 2, which when excited in the ultraviolet yields a Fran&-Condon excited singlet state,
4 February 1983
4
x-6 S13-
So2 + heat,
(5)
So3 + heat,
(6)
So3 + So? -f heat _
(7)
The identification of which process or combination of processes [eqs. (3)-(7)] is responsible for the exceptionally efficient electronic radiationless decay in non-polar solvents is a central issue in this study of HMPB, see below_ In polar, hydrogen-bonding solvents HMPB has been shown to exist (at least partially) in an intermolecularly bonded form. 1 [ 121. This type of spe-
4
E c
I
z-a
cn t
0
cu 0
15
S-01
Fig_ 1_ A schematic representation of the photodynamics of HMPB in the form of a Jablonski diagam.
489
Volume
94. number
5
CHEMICAL
4 February 1983
PHYSICS LETTERS
tics. which does not exhibit ESIPT [ 121. apparently also exists in non-polar solvent when small amounts of polar impurities are present_ see below. The pertinent kinetic steps associated with 1 are as fl~llows:
+iIU
s,
1
-
%l*
@I
s,, + hu.
(9)
S, I - S,,
+ herlt.
(10)
The emission spectra we observe for HMPB in lowtemperature organic glasses are displayed in fig. 2. Absorption spectroscopy of I-IhlPB in similar environments have been investigated [ 121 and reveals that 111s lowest-energy absorption band is at ~350 ml [eq_ ( 1 )] and 110 detectable absorption is present %I00 mn. The significantly Stokes-shifted 630 nm emission in ligs. 23 and 3 has been previously assigned to fluorescence Ieq_ i4)] from St, which is produced by ESIPT [cq. (‘)I. The emission we observe at =I00 nm is more diit?su11 to interpret. It would be tempting to assign this band IO llu~,resccnce from S, z [eq. (3)]_ But. a variety of
b
Wavelength
(nm)
IQ 2. Emission spectra of HMPB at low temperature with 355 nm excitation in the followin:: solvents: WX/IP (a). 3UP (b) and 3hlP with added moisture (c). Fig. 2s is truncated at 4 10 nm because of interference from a colored glass 400 nm “long pass” filter used in the collection optics for this spectrum only. A 375 nm “long pass” filter was employed in the collection of figs_ 2b and 2c.
Will.
Ttlc evidcncc just mentioned, as weI1 as the similarity of the <500 JIII~ emission spectrum (fig. 3b) to that
3.3. Time-resolved
specrroscopy
The time- and wavelength-resolved emission data are in complete agreement with fig. 1 and the arguments just made about the non-time-resolved spectroscopy. In both 3methylpentane (3MP) and a 1 : 1 mixture of methylcyclohexane and isopentane (MCH/IP), the 400 nm kinetics at <90 K appears in 2 ns. The red fluorescence band (monitored at 615 2 15 nm) also appears in
CHEhliCAL
Volume 94. number 5
3UP
I
T=SOK
.
Time
(psec)
Fig. 3. Time-resolved fluorescence of HMPB at low temperature in organic glasses. See the figure and texf for further details. The lifetime (~1) or lifetimes (~1 and ~~ biexponential decay) for the emission in each panelas determinedby a fitting procedure (see text) are as follows: (a) 7 = 2000 2 300 ps;(b)~=345~20ps:(c)~,=10+5psandr~=220~20ps; and(d)~1=10f5psand-rz=245i20ps.
PHYSICS LETTERS
4 February
1983
emission is considerably less intense than the 6 15 nm band. The non-exponential decay kinetics we observe at 615 nm may be a manifestation of time-resolvable vibrational relaxation which has been observed in many other low-temperature systems [4,5,7,18,19] _We have not investigated this aspect of the kinetics in detail, and will not discuss it further. The simplest interpretation of the fluorescence kinetics is that the species responsible for 400 mn and 615 nm fluorescence are kinetically unrelated and are due to excitation (355 nm) of two different groundstate species - presumably 1 and 2 as described above. This is supported by the observation that. while the relative non-time-resolved intensity of the 613 and 100 nm bands are dependent on sample preparation (see section 3_2), the kinetics of each of the bands are not_ Our data are in contradiction with the recent proposal by Huston et al. [lo] that S12 and St; are in rapid picosecond equilibrium, since we see no evidence of the onset of equilibrium in the 615 mn kinetics nor do we observe identical lifetimes at 615 and 400 nm - which their mechanism implies_ Based on these arguments, the 615 nm kinetics can now be analyzed to determine a lower limit for the rate constant for ESIPT, X-, in eq. (2)_ If it is assumed. as will be justified below, that k2 > X-, it can be shown simply that the rate of appearance of the 615 nm emission is a measure of X-2. Since we observe that emission at this wavelength is formed in (10 ps, even at 16 K, the rate constant for ESIPT in HMPB must be greater than 1011 s-l_ ESIPT rates as large as lOi s-l have indeed been observed for every compound structurally related to HMPB that has been studied by picosecond fluorescence spectroscopy [4,5,7,17,20]. and appears to be a general rule for this type of compound_ It has been suggested. incidentally, that the ESIPT in these compounds may be so rapid because ESIPT, in this case, is not impeded by a significant potential energy barrier and as such represents a special class of vibrational relaxation [?,2 1] _ 3.4. EIecrronic mdiationlessdecay mechanism It has been proposed that the dominant mechanism for electronic radiationless decay of HMPB [12.1~,15]
4 February 1983
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS
and relared compounds IIU -s,2
s,,
ES1P-f -s
[I ] is as follows: 13 - So3 + heat
- StI1 + heat.
(11)
The kinetics we observe at 615 mn (ij are consiswith this III~L-h311is1r1. (ii) suggest that the estrcmcly efficient decay mechanism of HMPB is due to 311 exceptionally large non-radiative decay rate (k6) of S13 as coInpared to related compounds. arid are consistcur \vith the assumption that k2 >k,. X-, can. of course. be Cslinlated sccurately from the inverse of trn~
the lifetime of the 615 nm kinetics. see figs. 3 and 4. II should 1x2mentioned. however. that low-temperature tr3w.icnt grourtd-state recovery me;lsurements will bc required to rigorously establish the validity of ccl_ ( I 1 ). \\‘c are prcscutly continuinp research on
llhll’l3 ahwg tlwse lines. The tcmpersrure and solvent dependence of the non-mdiative decay rate of S13 offer some insight on f hc IIIectIarIisIn of the decay process [es_ (G)] . see fig. 3. Seal- rhe $ss-forming Icrnperature of the solvenls [ :2 J. ;= 120 K. rhc drrrl?; rates increase rapidly with incrcasiug tcmpcrature. This is similar to related compw~ds. c-g_ 2-l ~-lI\~dros~plIen?:l)-beIIzotlIiazole (f 1131‘) [ 5 I_ and is evidcrlce tflat the decay process involvc’s. rit !cast p2rIly. a “large-amplitude internal molions'. Tltis type of iIncma1 motion. e.g. rotation sbou~ a single bond. which is available to “flexible” IIIC&XU~~S. and lends to be diIninished in the highly
.P.~C”,IP 3 M P
I 1
viscous environment of a glass solvent, can promote non-radiative decay. Incidentally, the use of large solvent viscosity effects on non-radiative decay rates as evidence for large-amplitude excited-state motion has been clearly established and quite popular [19,X---261. In the temperature range 16-90 K k6 is only slightly temperature dependent, even though the available thermal energy and solvent hardness [22] must be varying greatfy. Related compounds in the same envirdmnents exhibit radiationless decay rates that are orders of magnitude slower [4,5.7X2], because the large-amplitude motion decay mechanism of these LoI.Ipounds is essentially “turned off” in “rigid” environments. it seems reasonable then to suspect thaI the I?~ decay process has two components: (i) a process similar to other ESIPT molecules that involves large-amplitude motion and is dominant above the glass-forming temperature of the solvent and (ii) a process which is still rapid at high viscosity and extremely low temperature. The latter process seems analogous to the rapid radiationless decay observed in some “rigid” molecules [27]_ It is likely that the “rigid” component of the decay mechanism is, in fact, responsible for the exceptional photochemical stability of HMPB in “hard” environments, e.g. organic polymers [ 16]_ It is important to note. however. that the phenomenological separation of “large-amplitude” and “‘small-amplitude” decay components by viscosity effects is at best approximate in nature and only recently has been evaluated carefully by comparison to theoretical prediction [23] _The observation of weak viscosity effects on the radiative properties of obviously “rigid” molecules [3S] _ furthermore, suggest that weak viscosity effects must be interpreted with caution. The differences we observe between the decay kinetics of HMPB at -230 K in 3MP and MCH/IP may be a further example of a relatively weak “hardness” or viscosity effects on a “small-amplitude” motion controlled non-radiative decay process.
f 4. Conclusions
and summary
The non-time-resolved emission spectroscopy 2-(2’~hydroxy-5’-methylphenyl)-benzotriazole in temperature organic glasses has been investigated_ observed data are consistent with a kinetic model
of lowThe [eq.
CtiE,MICAL
PHYSI-
(1 l)] that has been discussed previously by several researchers_ Our results suggest that the extremely efficient electronic radiationless decay of this cqmpound is due to an exceptionally rapid decay rate for the proton-transferred
form (S13) of the electronically
ex-
cited singlet state.
Acknowledgement
Acknowledgement
is made for partial support
of
this research to the following agencies: the donors of the Petroleum Research Fund (administered by the American Chemical Society), the Research Corporation, and the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota. SRF would like to thank the Allied Corporation for partial support during the period of thii
research_
LETTERS
1983
[9] A. Strandjord, S. Courtney, DM Friedrich and P.F. Barbara, Excited-State Dynamics of S-Hydrosyflavone, J. Phys. Chem., submitted for publication. [lo] A. Huston, G-W. Scott and A. Gupta, J_ Chem. Phvs.. 76 (1982) 4978. Ill1 A-A. E&nov and VS. Sivokhin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSR 250 (1980) 387. 1121 T. Werner, J. Phys. Chem. 83 (1979) 320. 1131 VS. Sivokhin and A-A. Eftmov. Zb. Prikl. Spectroskopiys 31 (1979) 813. 1141 A. Gupta, G-W. Scott and D. Kliger, ACS Symposium Series 151 (ACS, Washington, 1960) ch. 3. 1151 J-A. Otterstedt. J. Chem. Phys. 58 (1973) 5716. [=I HJ_ He&r and H.R. Bhttmann, Pure AppL Chem 36 (1973) 141_ 1171 K.K. Smith and K J. Kaufman, J. Phys. Chem. 82 (1978) 2286. WI P.F. Barbara, P.M. Rentzepis and L.E. Brus. J. Chem. Phys. 72 (1980) 6802; B-P. Boczar and M-R_ Topp. Vibrational. Excitonic and !dolecular Site Relasation of Perylene in Solid Solution at Low Temperature. presented at the 182nd ACS National hlerting, New York, 1961.
[I91
P-F_ Barbara. S-D. Rand and P-XI. Renrrepis, J. Am.
PI
Chem. Sot. 103 (1961) 2156. GJ. Woolfe and PJ. Thisticrh~~aite, 1. Am. Chem. Sot.
References 111 W_ Kliinffer. Advan. Photochrm. 10 (1977) 311_ i2] D. Huppert~bl. Gutman and K.J. Klaufma&, Advan. Chem. Phvs. 47 (1981) 643. [3] J-F_ Ireland and P.A.H. Wyatt. Advan. Phys. Org. Chem. 12 (1976) 131. 141 PI_ Barbara. PM. Rentzepis and L.E. Brus, J. Am_ Chem. Sot. 102 (1980) 2786. 151 P-F. Barbara, LE. Brus and PM. Rentzepis, J. Am. Chem. Sot. 102 (1980) 5631. [6] H. Inoue. hl. Hida, N. Nakashiia and K. Yoshihara, J. Phys. Chem. 86 (1982) 3184. [7] P.F. Barbara, S.H. Courtney and K. Ding. Picosecond Emission Spectroscopy with Intensified Photodiode Arrays, presented at the 184th National Meeting of the ACS, Kansas City, September 1982; K. Ding. S.H. Courtney, AJ_ Strandjord, S. Flom. D. Friedrich and P-F. Barbara, Excited-State Intramolecular Proton Transfer and Vibrational Relaxation in 2-(2Hydroxyphenyl)-Benzothiazole. J. Phys. Chem., submitted for publication. [S] P-F. Barbara, A. Strandjord and S. Courtney, ExcitedState Dynamics of 3-Hydroxyllavone, presented at the 16th Great Lakes Regional ACS hleeting, Normal, Illinois, June 1982.
4 February
103 (1981)
Pll [22] I231 1341 [25] 1261 1271 IW
3649;
D. Ford, P-J. Thistlethwite and G-J. Woolfe. Chem. Phys. Letters 69 (1980) 246. D-L. Williams and A. Heller. J. Phys. Chem. 74 (1970) 4473. G. Fischer and E_ Fischer, !%lol. Photochrm. 8 (1977) 279. S.P. Velsko and G.R. Fleming. J. Chem. Phys. 76 (1982) 3553. J-R. Taylor, h1.C. Adams and W. Sibbett, 1. Photochem. 12 (1980) 127. Th. Forster and G. Hoffman. Z. Physik Chem. (Leipzig) 75 (1971) 63. D_ Gegiou, K-A. hluszkst and E. Fischer. J_ Am. Chem. Sot. 90 (1966) 12. G.W. Robinson, Excited States 1 (1974) l_ T.G. Politis and H-G. Drickamer, J_ Chem. Phys. 75 (1981) 3203; E. Blatt, E. Treloar and K-P- Ghkino, J. Phys. Chem. 85 (1981) 2810.
393