263 THE REMOVAL OF TESTOSTERONE BINDING GLOBULIN FROM PLASMA BY AFFINITY
CHROMATOGRAPHY
Sumner H. Burstein Department of Biophysics,
The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel”
Received June 26, 1969 ABSTRACT The use of steroid immobilized on an insoluble polysaccharide for the separation of a specific binding protein from human plasma is described. An androstane derivative covalently bound to agarose was effective in removing testosterone binding globulin from plasma. The protein could subsequently be separated from the reagent in low yield by means of guanidine.
The presence in human plasma of a protein which specifically binds testosterone has been indicated by the work of several groups . ’ A facile method for separating proteins, which reversibly bind small molecules from complex mixtures has been known for some time. ’ This method, called affinity chromatography,
has been applied to the purification of enzymes and
antibodies with considerable success.
Experiments designed to separate
estradiol receptor proteins from uterine preparations by affinity chromatography have also recently been published. 3 Unfortunately, these latter authors were unable to obtain the protein free from the specific adsorbent which obviously limits the utility of their findings.
It was thought that suitable adapta-
tion of the above techniques could be applied to the separation of testosterone binding globulin (TBG) from plasma. In general the method involves the covalent attachment of the small molecule to an insoluble polymer in such a fashion that it is still free to bind to its specific protein.
When a mixture containing the specific binding protein
On leave from the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, Shrewsbury, Mass.
264
STEROIDS
14:3
is passed through a column of such a polymer, will be retained.
Subsequent displacement
only the protein which binds
of the protein
should yield a
pure substance. The polymeric purified
saccharide
beaded form
is available
commercially
in a
which has excellent chromatographic 4 A method has been described for linking primary-amino
properties. containing
agarose
molecules
(Sepharose)
to agarose
by means of cyanogen
nature of the bonding is not known, however,
bromide.
it is believed
The exact
that a urethan 2
type derivative decided
Based on the experience
is formed.
that an agarose
complex
of others
would give the best chances
it was for success
in
this case. The problem sterone
affecting
In fact the essential
binding affinity.
only a 17 (3-hydroxyl
p-01 is commercially
available
The binding constant which was considered chromatography.
therefore,
and seemed
of TBG is reported
sufficiently
no interference
shown to be a
3 P-Aminoandrostan-17
to be approximately
high for a successful
separation
in a non-specific
of magnitude
features. 1
10’ by affinity
manner,
lower than TBG,
is to be expected.
of all of the above factors
the separation
of TBG from plasma.
pure material
to allow the properties
The more pragmatic
for plasma testosterone
were
to have all of the required
its constant is about four orders
aspect
prompted
The objective
the undertaking
of
was to obtain sufficient
of this protein to be studied in some of using the protein
in displacement
assays ’
was also considered. MATERIALS
Labelled
since testo-
work on TBG ’ showed
features
substituent.
Albumin binds testosterone
Considerations
detail.
then arose
that ring A could be altered within limits without seriously
D containing
however,
steroid
The published
does not have an amino group.
quite clearly
ring
of finding an appropriate
Testosterone
:
AND METHODS
1, 2-H3-Testosterone
England Nuclear Corp. and had a specific was checked by thin layer chromatography.
activity
was purchased of 50.0
Ci/mM.
from Purity
New
STEROIDS
Sept. 1969
265
Commercially available agarose (Sepharose 4B, Pharmacia Agarose: Co.) was used without any prior treatment. 3 p-Aminoandrostan-17 p-01: This steroid was purchased from Ikapharm co. , Ramat Gan, Israel, and used without further purification. The m. p. , infrared spectrum and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum were all consistent with the above formula. Pooled plasma was obtained through the courtesy of the Kaplan Plasma: Hospital, Rehovot, Israel. The sample contained contributions from both male and female donors and was stored under sterile conditions at 4’C. Assay for Binding Activity: The procedure followed was adapted from the results of Vermeulen and Verdonck. ’ Briefly, this involved incubation of 0.5 ml of plasma with about 100,000 dpm H3-testosterone. The bound material was separated from unbound by gel filtration chromatography on Sephadex G-25 (1 x 25 cm column). The elution patterns were exactly as those reported. All of the proteins appeared in the lo-20 mlvolume of effluent; the unbound testosterone came out in a broad peak centered at about 50 ml. Aliquots (0.2 ml) of the protein containing fraction were counted in a mixture of toluene-ethanol (10:3) containing 4 g PPO and 50 mg POPOP per liter. A Packard Tri Carb instrument was used and efficiencies were determined by the internal standard method. Preparation of Steroid-Agarose Complex: The method of Porath 4 was used exactly as described in the literature except that a steroid was used for the amino component. About 30 mg of steroid was reacted with 30 g of “activated” Sepharose and approximately 90% of the steroid was covalently bound. About 2-3 mg of steroid could be found in the filtrate from the reaction mixture and only traces of steroid could be extracted by leaching of a polymer sample with a CHC13-ethanol mixture. Separation of T. B. G. : A bed of the steroid-sepharose complex 1 cm in diameter x 2 cm high was prepared. 50 ml of plasma were passed through at room temperature at the rate of about 1.0 ml/min. The column was then washed with 0.15 M phosphate buffer (PH 7.4) until only traces of protein were being eluted. The displacing solution (1.0 M guanidine. HCl) was then passed through followed by several volumes of buffer (0.15 M phosphate, pH 7.4) to insure complete elution. The eluent was concentrated using pressure filtration through a gel membrane (Diaflo Corp. ). A “50,000 cut-off” membrane (XM - 50) was used after a control run indicated that no binding activity is lost by this procedure. RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
The removal of TBG from plasma by affirfity chromatography is summarized in the Table below.
The first column (dpm) represents the
2G6
14:3
STEROIDS total radioactivity
in the bound fraction
and is therefore
amount of TBG present.
The total protein
estimated
the optical
second
by determining
The ratio dpm/O.
column.
the solution with respect
content in the bound fraction
D. (r)
is a measure
Chromatography
decrease
1 (about 50 ml) contains
0. D.
(dpm)
n8epharosem demonstrating
r (dpm/O. D. )
(280 mp)
5,500 1,300 23,400 159,000 5,600 4,200
2. 8 2.6 0.080 0.015 2.4 0.63
the bulk of the plasma
An aliquot was assayed
could not be observed
after it was passed
for binding activity by untreated
when plasma was passed
that the steroid-agarose
and showed a
plasma
complex
was interacting
The question now was whether the TBG had been somehow
or whether
it could be retrieved
No significant
negligible.
(Fraction
fraction
agent was needed to remove was eluted by passing
was immediately Fraction
three times
in an effort
for binding activity. in binding activity
binding activity
density
could be detected
of the high binding constant a fairly
the TBG from the column.
A third
1.0 ml of 1 M guanidine. HCl at pH 2.1. 6 This
diluted by 10 ml of buffer
3 was concentrated
(50 ml) until the optical
2).
It was then apparent that because powerful
denatured
from the column intact.
The column was then washed with buffer
in these washings
(see Table).
over untreated
with TBG.
of the eluent became
of
of Plasma
of about 75’4 from the value exhibited
This effect
of enrichment
15,500 3,380 1,870 2,380 13,500 2,600
Untreated plasma Fraction 1 Fraction 3 Fraction 3 ’ “Sepharose” control “Diaflo” control
through the column.
was
density at 280 rnp and is shown in the
Bound Radioactivity
Fraction
of the
to TBG.
Affinity
Sample
a measure
(PH 7.4) to minimize
by ultrafiltration,
to remove
rediluted
all of the guanidine.
As can be seen from the Table, had been achieved.
denaturation.
and reconcentrated It was then assayed
about a 4 fold enrichment
267
STEROIDS
Sept. 1969
The bound fraction (10 ml) from the assay of Fraction 3 was then concentrated
to
1.0 ml by ultrafiltration
chromatography was assayed
had removed
since it was expected
all traces
of guanidine.
and indeed the binding activity
Examination
of the total radioactivity
the yield of TBG by this procedure that the guanidine does not efficiently is that considerable
protein
The concentrate
had increased in Fractions
is quite small remove
(Fraction
3 ‘)
more than 6 fold. 3 and 3’ indicates
(0.4’4).
One possibility
the adhering
is being inreversibly
that Sephadex
protein.
denatured
that is
Another
in the process.
It
3
is interesting difficulties
to note that Vonderhaar
with their receptor
The above experiments this protein
from plasma
and Mueller
have experienced
similar
proteins. with TBG demonstrate
by affinity
the possibility
chromatography.
will,
of course,
have to be improved
before
large
samples.
It is hoped that future efforts
The efficiency
of separating of the process
it can be used for the preparation on this problem
will resolve
of
this
difficulty.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express for the hospitality
extended
are also due to numerous in conducting preparation
this research.
Cancer
Society
to Professor
E. Katchalski
during the tenure of his stay in Rehovot. other members In particular
of the agarose-steroid
This project
gratitude
complex
was made possible
(Grant No. P-498).
of the Institute for advice the help of Dr. is greatly
with the financial
Thanks and help
S. Blumberg
in the
appreciated. assistance
of the American
268
14:3
STEROIDS
REFERENCES
Steroids, 2,
609 (1968) and references,
1.
Vermeulen, A., Verdonck, cited therein.
2(a)
Baker, B. R. “Design of 4ctive-Site-Directed Irreversible Inhibitors “, Chap. 13, John Wiley and Sons (1967).
(b)
L.,
Enzyme-
Silman, I. H., Katchalski, E., Ann. Rev. Biochem. v 35_, 873 (1966).
3.
Vonderhaar, B., Muella, G. C., Biochim. Biophgs. Acta,
176, 626 (1969).
4.
Porath, J., Axen, R.,
5.
Horton, R. , Kato, T. , Sherins, R. , Steroids, 10, 245 (1967).
6.
Cuatrecasas, 235 (1968).
Ernback, S., Nature, 215, 1491 (1967).
P. , Wilchek, M. , Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.
33(2) -