REVIEW The spread of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum b-lactamases G. M. Rossolini, M. M. D’Andrea and C. Mugnaioli Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Sezione di Microbiologia, Universita` di Siena, Siena, Italy
ABSTRACT CTX-M-type enzymes are a group of class A extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBLs) that are rapidly spreading among Enterobacteriaceae worldwide. More that 50 allotypes are known, clustered into six sub-lineages. The CTX-M-encoding genes have been captured from the chromosome of Kluyvera spp. on conjugative plasmids that mediate their dissemination among pathogenic enterobacteria. CTX-M-type ESBLs exhibit powerful activity against cefotaxime and ceftriaxone but generally not against ceftazidime, which has important implications for laboratory detection. However, several CTX-M variants with enhanced ceftazidimase activity have been detected. The rapid and massive spread of CTX-M-type ESBLs is rapidly changing the ESBL epidemiology and, in some geographical areas, these enzymes are now the most prevalent ESBLs in Enterobacteriaceae. Keywords
CTX-M, Enterobacteriaceae, epidemiology, extended-spectrum b-lactamase, review
Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14 (Suppl. 1): 33–41
INTRODUCTION Among the ‘new’ b-lactamases emerging in Gramnegative pathogens, the molecular class A extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBLs), active against expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and monobactams (but not against cephamycins or carbapenems), are currently of great epidemiological and clinical interest [1,2]. The dissemination of these enzymes is a problem of global magnitude, with rates of ESBL production being particularly high in some enterobacterial species (e.g., Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli) and in some areas (e.g., Europe and South America) [2]. The emergence of ESBLs followed the introduction into clinical practice of expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, which are acknowledged to be the most powerful selectors for these resistance determinants. The spread of ESBLs represents a major challenge to the activity of these drugs, which were a milestone in antimicrobial chemotherapy of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative pathogens [2]. Enterobacteriaceae have adopted two major strategies for the production of ESBL activity: Corresponding author and reprint requests: G. M. Rossolini, Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Sezione di Microbiologia, Universita` di Siena, I-53100 Siena, Italy E-mail:
[email protected]
(i) expansion of substrate specificity of the broadspectrum TEM- and SHV-type b-lactamases, which were already widespread as acquired b-lactamases in the clinical setting when expanded-spectrum cephalosporins were introducted, by substitution of single or multiple amino-acid residues at critical positions; and (ii) capture of new genes encoding enzymes with ESBL activity by horizontal transfer [3]. The latter strategy became more prominent at a somewhat later date (since the early 1990s), but has gained an increasingly important role in the evolution of ESBLs. Several types of acquired ESBLs, other than TEM and SHV mutants, have been described in Enterobacteriaceae, including the CTX-M, VEB, GES ⁄ IBC, PER, TLA, BES and SFO enzymes [2]. Among these, the CTX-M-type ESBLs are by far the most successful in terms of spread and, in several settings, their impact is currently comparable to, or even greater than, that of TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs. This review aims to provide an overview of CTX-M-type ESBLs and their rapidly increasing epidemiological and clinical impact. CTX-M-TYPE b-LACTAMASES: A RAPIDLY GROWING GROUP CTX-M-type enzymes constitute a distinct lineage of molecular class A b-lactamases, and are a
2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
34 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 14, Supplement 1, January 2008
CTX-M-45
CTX-M-1/3/10-12/15/ CTX-M-2/4-7/20/ 31/35/43/44 22/23/28-30/32-34/ CTX-M-25/26/ 36/37/42/52-54/57/58/60/61 39/41 CTX-M-8/40/63 CTX-M-9/13/14/ 16/17-19/21/24/ 27/38/46-51/55/65
Fig. 1. The six known sub-lineages (or groups) of CTX-M-type b-lactamases, shown in a tree diagram that reflects similarity at the amino-acid sequence level. Filled triangles at the end of each branch indicate the presence of minor allelic variants within the corresponding group. The tree was constructed with the TREEVIEW program (http://taxonomy. zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treeview.html), based on a multiple sequence alignment of the publicly available CTX-M sequences (http://www.lahey.org/Studies/). The degree of amino-acid sequence divergence among different groups ranges from 9.3% to 32% (or 25%, not considering the most divergent CTX-M-45 enzyme), being £3.5% within each group. CTX-M-14 is identical to CTX-M-18, and only the former is listed. Toho-1 corresponds to CTX-M-44, Toho-2 to CTX-M-45, UOE-1 to CTX-M-15, and UOE-2 and Toho-3 to CTX-M-14.
rapidly growing group. The first CTX-M-type enzyme of clinical origin, CTX-M-1, was described in enterobacterial strains isolated in Europe in the late 1980s [4]. Thereafter, new CTX-M variants have been described at an increasing pace and, presently, more than 50 allelic variants are known, clustered in six sublineages or groups. Each group is named after the first described member and, usually, includes minor allelic variants that differ from each other by single or a few amino-acid residues (Fig. 1). CAPTURE AND SPREAD OF CTX-MTYPE b-LACTAMASE GENES IN THE CLINICAL SETTING Unlike for most other acquired ESBLs, the original source of genes encoding CTX-M-type b-lactamases is known. The sources of CTX-M determinants are chromosomal genes resident in members of the genus Kluyvera, which includes a number of environmental species with little or no pathogenic activity against humans. In particular, precursors of genes encoding enzymes of the CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-2 groups have been detected in strains of Kluyvera ascorbata [4,5], while precursors of genes encoding enzymes of the CTX-M-8 and CTX-M-9 group occur in strains of Kluyvera georgiana [4,6]. The original sources of genes encoding members of the CTX-M-25 and
CTX-M-45 subgroups remain to be identified, but most likely comprise other members of the genus Kluyvera. Altogether, the heterogeneity of CTXM-type enzymes spreading in the clinical setting among enterobacterial pathogens probably reflects the occurrence of multiple independent events of capture of blaCTX-M genes from somewhat different sources within the Kluyvera genus. Multiple genetic mechanisms have apparently been involved in the capture and dissemination of CTX-M determinants. Genes encoding enzymes of several CTX-M groups (CTX-M-1, CTX-M-2, CTX-M-9 and CTX-M-25) have been found downstream of an ISEcp1 insertion sequence (Fig. 2), a transposable element that can co-mobilise flanking DNA fragments via a one-ended transposition mechanism. This was experimentally shown to be able to mediate the capture of blaCTX-M genes from the chromosomes of Kluyvera spp. and to facilitate their inter-replicon mobility inside E. coli hosts [7,8]. Genes encoding enzymes of some CTX-M groups (CTX-M-2 and CTX-M-9) have also been found within the so-called CR1 region associated with some class 1 integrons (Fig. 2). ISEcp1 and the recombination system associated with CR1 regions have probably played a major role in the capture of blaCTX-M genes by conjugative plasmids, and in their further inter-replicon dissemination, while the association of CR1 regions with
2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
Rossolini et al.
(a)
CTX-M b-lactamases 35
blaCTX-M-15 ISEcp1
IRi
qacEΔ1 sul1
intI1
3’CS1
Gene cassettes
qacEΔ1 sul1 orf5 3’CS2
(b)
blaCTX-M-2
ISCR1
(c)
Similar to tnpA from Tn1000
Phage related DNA invertase
blaCTX-M-10
Fig. 2. Examples of different genetic contexts of blaCTX-M genes. (a) blaCTX-M-15 located downstream of ISEcp1. A similar arrangement has also been observed with several other blaCTX-M allotypes of the CTX-M-1, CTX-M-2, CTX-M-9 and CXTM-25 groups [4,33]. (b) blaCTX-M-2 located downstream of ISCR1, in association with a class 1 integron structure [4,34]. A similar arrangement has also been observed with several other blaCTX-M allotypes of the CTX-M-2 and CXT-M-9 groups [34]. (c) blaCTX-M-10 in an unusual genetic context, associated with phage-related genes and insertion sequences [35].
Tn402-like backbones could provide a further mechanism of mobility for resistance genes. Recently, a blaCTX-M-10 gene (CTX-M-9 group) was detected within an original genetic context, associated with phage-related sequences (Fig. 2), suggesting that additional types of mobile element might be involved in the mobilisation of blaCTX-M genes. The horizontal spread of blaCTX-M genes among strains of the same or different enterobacterial
species is largely promoted by plasmids, which often are self-conjugative and carry additional resistance determinants [4]. FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF CTXM-TYPE b-LACTAMASES The CTX-M-type b-lactamases are natural ESBLs that exhibit a striking substrate preference for cefotaxime (and ceftriaxone) over ceftazidime
Table 1. Catalytic efficiencies of CTX-M-type enzymes, representative of major groups, for some b-lactam substrates kcat ⁄ KM ( ⁄ s ⁄ M) Enzymes
Group
PEN
LOT
CTX-M-3 CTX-M-8 CTX-M-9 CTX-M-44
CTX-M-1 CTX-M-8 CTX-M-9 CTX-M-2
>5 · 107 1 · 107 1 · 107 3 · 106
3 2 2 1
· · · ·
107 107 107 107
CTX 3 1 4 2
· · · ·
106 106 106 106
CAZ
FEP
ATM
NH <4 · 103 3 · 103 1 · 103
1 · 103 1 · 105 ND 7 · 104
1 · 106 2 · 104 5 · 104 ND
PEN, penicillin G; LOT, cephalothin; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; ATM, aztreonam; NH, no detectable hydrolysis; ND, no data available. Data are from [4] and [13] 2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
36 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 14, Supplement 1, January 2008
(Table 1). Their strong cefotaximase activity is related to the unique geometry of the b-lactambinding site, which allows efficient recognition of penicillins, narrow-spectrum cephalosporins and cefotaxime, but not of the bulkier ceftazidime molecule [9,10]. The peculiar substrate specificity of CTX-Mtype enzymes has important implications for laboratory detection. Strains of Enterobacteriaceae with CTX-M enzymes normally appear to be resistant or exhibit reduced susceptibility to cefotaxime (also to ceftriaxone and cefpodoxime) and are readily detected as potential ESBL producers using the CLSI breakpoints indicating suspicion of ESBL production [11], whereas they often appear to be susceptible to ceftazidime, with MIC values and inhibition zone sizes, respectively, lower or larger than the CLSI breakpoints indicating suspicion of ESBL production. Therefore, to ensure that no isolate with CTX-M enzymes is missed, cefotaxime (or ceftriaxone or cefpodoxime) must always be included, in addi-
tion to ceftazidime, in screening for the presence of ESBL producers in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Modulation of the substrate spectrum of CTXM-type enzymes by point mutations is possible, similar to what happens with the TEM- and SHVtype enzymes [3]. In particular, a number of CTXM mutants with increased ceftazidimase activity have been described. These have probably been selected by the massive use of ceftazidime in clinical practice [4,12,13]. The mutations in these variants occur in two of the structural elements that delimit the b-lactam-binding site, namely the terminal part of the B3 b-strand and the W-loop (Fig. 3). The Asp240 fi Gly substitution in the terminal part of the B3 b-strand is responsible for increased flexibility of the b-strand, rendering the active site more accessible to the bulkier ceftazidime molecule [9], while the substitutions in the X-loop (at position 167) apparently modify the mode of interaction of b-lactams with the binding site [14]. Overall, these mutations result in a
α2
β3
Ser *
167 Ω loop 240
Fig. 3. Modulation of the substrate spectrum of CTX-M-type enzymes by point mutations. The structure of a CTX-M-type enzyme (CTX-M-9; PDB entry 1YLJ) is shown here as a ribbon diagram generated with the DEEPVIEW program (http:// www.expasy.org/spdbv/). As with other serine b-lactamases, the overall molecular fold consists of an a-helical domain (on the left side) and a mixed a ⁄ b-domain (on the right side). The b-lactam-binding site, indicated by an arrow, is located in a cleft between the two domains. Positions 167 and 240, where amino-acid substitutions enhancing ceftazidimase activity occur, are located either in the X-loop (in green, at the bottom of the binding site) or in the terminal part of the B3 b-strand (b3, in red, on the right side of the binding site), and are shown by red dots. The active site serine residue (Ser*) in the active site, located at the end of H2 a-helix (a2, in yellow), is also shown. The Asp240 fi Gly substitution should increase the flexibility of the B3 b-strand, rendering the active site more accessible to the bulkier ceftazidime molecule [9]. The Pro167 fi Ser substitution in the X-loop is thought to modify the mode of interaction of b-lactams with the binding site, allowing better recognition of ceftazidime but impairing recognition of some other substrates [14]. 2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
Rossolini et al.
CTX-M b-lactamases 37
Table 2. Susceptibility to various b-lactams of Escherichia coli strains producing CTX-M derivatives with enhanced ceftazidimase activity, in comparison with that of E. coli strains producing the parent enzymes MICs (mg ⁄ L) E. coli strains
Enzymes
CTX
DH10Ba DH10B DH10B
None CTX-M-3 CTX-M-15 (CTX-M-3 Asp240 fi Gly) CTX-M-54 (CTX-M-3 Pro167 fi Gln) CTX-M-1 CTX-M-32 (CTX-M-1 Asp240 fi Gly) CTX-M-9 CTX-M-16 (CTX-M-9 Asp240 fi Gly) CTX-M-18 CTX-M-19 (CTX-M-18 Pro167 fi Ser)
£0.06 >256 >256
J53 TG1 TG1 DH5a DH5a JM109 JM109
CAZ £0.06 32 256
FEP
ATM
£0.06 128 64
0.06 128 64
8
128
1
2
>128 >128
6 >256
48 64
48 >256
16 16
1 8
ND ND
4 8
64 4
2 128
16 4
64 4
a
The b-lactam susceptibility of E. coli DH10B, as a representative host not producing b-lactamase activity, is shown for comparison. ND, no data available. CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; ATM, aztreonam. Data are from [4] (for the CTX-M-3 ⁄ CTX-M-15, CXT-M-9 ⁄ CTX-M-16 and CTX-M-14 ⁄ CTX-M-19 pairs), from [15] (for the CTX-M-1 ⁄ CTX-M-32 pair) and from [16] (for CTX-M-54).
modest increase in the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme against ceftazidime [4,12,13]. Nevertheless, this is sufficient to significantly increase the ceftazidime MICs for the strains producing the mutant enzymes (Table 2). Unlike the Asp240 fi Gly substitution, which does not significantly affect the activity of the enzyme against other b-lactam substrates, the substitutions in the X-loop are associated with a significant decrease in the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme for other substrates [4,12,13], which is also reflected in the corresponding MIC values (Table 2). This could account, at least in part, for the fact that the Asp240 fi Gly substitution has apparently been selected more frequently than mutations in the X-loop. THE 1960s EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CTX-M-TYPE b-LACTAMASES Strains producing CTX-M-type ESBLs were first reported, sporadically, in the late 1980s in Japan, Europe and Argentina [4]. In the early 1990s, a massive spread of CTX-M-producing strains occurred in Argentina and neighbouring countries. This regional CTX-M epidemic involved several enterobacterial species (including
Salmonella enterica, Proteus mirabilis, E. coli, Shigella sonnei, Morganella morganii, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens and Enterobacter aerogenes) and, mostly, allotypes of the CTX-M-2 group [4]. During the past 15 years, CTX-M-type ESBLs have undergone a rapid and global spread. Enterobacterial strains producing these enzymes have now been reported almost everywhere (Fig. 4) and, in some settings, CTX-M-type enzymes outnumber the classic TEM- and SHVtype ESBLs [15,16]. This massive worldwide dissemination, which could be referred to as the ‘CTX-M pandemic’, is one of the most striking examples of rapid and global dissemination of plasmid-mediated resistance determinants among bacterial pathogens, and has been compared to the dissemination of the broad-spectrum TEMtype b-lactamases observed since the 1960s. The reason(s) for such an explosive dissemination of CTX-M-type ESBLs in Enterobacteriaceae remain(s) to be clarified. Carriage on plasmids that are highly efficient at conjugal transfer, and ⁄ or a lower fitness cost imposed by these enzymes and cognate genetic elements upon the bacterial hosts (as compared with other types of ESBLs), could be included among the possible explanations for the remarkable success of CTX-M-type enzymes, as
2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
38 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 14, Supplement 1, January 2008
CTX-M-1 group CTX-M-2 group CTX-M-8 group CTX-M-9 group CTX-M-25 group CTX-M-45 group Uncharacterized CTX-M type
Fig. 4. World map showing locations where clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae producing CTX-M-type extendedspectrum b-lactamases have been reported. Data are according to Reference [4] and the subsequent literature available on the PubMed database (http://www.pubmed.com).
compared with other types of ESBLs. However, these issues remain to be clarified and would constitute an interesting subject for future investigations. In recent surveillance studies, high rates of CTX-M enzymes among ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates have been reported from South America, Asia and Europe, while a lower impact has been observed in Canada
(Table 3). In some of those settings, rates of CTX-M-production as high as 89.7% in E. coli and 58.5% in K. pneumoniae have been reported (Table 3). In Europe, where the TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs were first described and have played a major role as ESBL determinants [3], the CTX-Mtype ESBLs have recently achieved a remarkable diffusion in several countries. The spread of
Country
Year(s)
E. coli (%)
K. pneumoniae (%)
References
Russia Canada Argentina Spain Italy Taiwan South Korea
1997–1998 2000 2000 2002 2003 2003 2003
35.9 6.3 80.0 52.3 54.8 89.7 30.4
35.0 13.7a 50.0 12.5 12.3 58.5 32.7
[17] [36] [37] [19] [20] [16] [38]
Table 3. Rates of isolates with CTX-M enzymes, among extendedspectrum b-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, as reported in recent surveillance studies
a
Klebsiella spp.
2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
Rossolini et al.
CTX-M-producing strains was first reported in eastern Europe [4,17], but has subsequently involved also western and southern European countries. One of the most striking examples of rapid dissemination of these ESBLs has been reported in the UK, where CTX-M enzymes were first reported in 2000 and have subsequently undergone an explosive spread involving E. coli and also K. pneumoniae, with a predominance of group 1 enzymes (mostly CTX-M-15) [18]. In the London area, E. coli resistance to expandedspectrum cephalosporins increased from 1.8% in 2001 to 7.5% in 2004, largely as a consequence of the diffusion of CTX-M-type ESBLs [18], raising considerable concern, since E. coli is one of the most common species isolated from clinical samples. A remarkable diffusion of CTX-M-type ESBLs has also been observed in the most recent nationwide surveys of ESBL production carried out in Spain [19] and Italy [20]. In Spain, rates of production of CTX-M enzymes were found to be 52.3% and 12.5% among ESBL-producing isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively, with a predominance of group 9 (CTX-M-9 and CTX-M-14) and group 1 (CTX-M-10) [19]. In Italy, the rates of CTX-M production were found to be 54.8% and 12.3% among ESBL-producing isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively, with an absolute predominance of group 1 enzymes (mostly CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-15 and, less frequently, CTX-M-32) [20,21]. High-rates of CTX-M enzymes have also been reported in Greek hospitals [15], and the presence of CTX-M-type ESBLs of various groups has been well-documented in other European countries, including France, Austria and Sweden [22–24]. The progressive change in the epidemiology of ESBLs due to the spread of CTX-M-type enzymes has been clearly documented in two longitudinal studies, carried out at a regional level, in northern Italy and in Austria [23,25]. In those areas, the prevalence of CTX-M enzymes among ESBLproducing E. coli was found to be low or nil at the beginning of the surveillance period (12.5% in Italy in 1999; 0% in Austria in 1998), but a steady increase in prevalence was observed during the following years, concluding with rates that were as high as 38.2% of all ESBLs in Italy in 2003 and 85% in Austria in 2004, respectively. Notably, the increase of CTX-M enzymes in E. coli as compared with other ESBL types did not reflect a
CTX-M b-lactamases 39
relative, but rather an absolute, increase in the former isolates. Although originally confined to hospitals, ESBL-producing strains are now emerging also in the community [26]. This is an alarming phenomenon that could have major implications for antimicrobial chemotherapy. Most ESBL-producing isolates that cause community-acquired infections have been E. coli, with CTX-M-type b-lactamases [26]. In a recent study, producers of CTX-M enzymes were found to be involved in eight of ten cases of bacteraemia caused by community-acquired ESBL-producing enterobacteria [27]. Another relevant issue in the epidemiology of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (especially E. coli) is their presence in the commensal microbiota of humans. Here again, the CTX-M-type ESBLs appear to play a consistent role. In a recent study from Spain, rates of faecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli during non-outbreak situations were found to be as high as 11.8% among inpatients and 5.5% among outpatients, while 42% and 69% of the ESBL-positive isolates, respectively, had CTX-M-type enzymes [28]. In another recent study, carried out in Israel, a 10.8% rate of faecal carriage of ESBL-positive isolates was found upon hospital admission, and most of the community-acquired isolates produced a CTX-M-type enzyme [27]. The risk of developing subsequent bacteraemia caused by an ESBL-producing strain was found to be significantly higher in colonised vs. non-colonised patients [27]. Finally, E. coli isolates with CTXM enzymes have also been detected in samples from livestock [29,30] and companion animals [31], showing that animals might act as an important reservoir. CLINICAL IMPACT OF CTX-M-TYPE b-LACTAMASES Overall, production of CTX-M-type b-lactamases has the same clinical implications as production of other ESBLs, leaving carbapenems as the only reliable b-lactams for treatment of serious infections caused by producer pathogens [2]. Similar to what was observed with enterobacterial strains producing TEM- and SHV-type ESBLs, high-rates of co-resistance to potentially active drugs, e.g., fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides, have also been reported for strains with CTX-M enzymes.
2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
40 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 14, Supplement 1, January 2008
In the most recent nationwide survey carried out in Italy, the gentamicin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant rates, among E. coli with CTX-M enzymes, were 62% and 19%, respectively [21]. Although carbapenems are stable to CTX-Mtype enzymes, the emergence of resistance during carbapenem therapy has recently been reported in a K. pneumoniae strain producing the CTX-M-15 enzyme, following the loss of an outer-membrane porin [32]. Such mutations tend to be rapidly lost in the absence of a selective pressure; however, the possibility of selection of carbapenem-resistant mutants of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae during carbapenem therapy is a matter of concern, due to the increasing prevalence of these enzymes and to the limited number of therapeutic alternatives.
testing ceftazidime as the sole representative of expanded-spectrum cephalosporins can lead to false-negative results, thereby underestimating the prevalence of ESBL producers.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
REFERENCES
The CTX-M-type ESBLs have recently undergone a rapid and global spread in Enterobacteriaceae. This CTX-M ‘epidemic’ is changing the epidemiology of ESBLs and, in several settings, the CTXM-type ESBLs are now the most prevalent ESBLs encountered in E. coli and K. pneumoniae. The propensity of CTX-M-encoding genes to rapidly spread in E. coli is a matter of major concern, considering that this is one of the most common species isolated from clinical samples. Dissemination of the CTX-M-type ESBLs is not restricted to the nosocomial setting but also involves the community. This phenomenon is acting to modify the epidemiology of ESBLs, whereas those enzymes were, previously, mostly restricted to the nosocomial setting. The CTX-M-type b-lactamases exhibit a remarkable allotypic diversity, and their genes occur in a notable variety of genetic contexts. Both these features, and especially the latter, could account for the rapid dissemination exhibited by these resistance determinants. Evolution of substrate specificity by point mutations is also possible, as with TEM- and SHV-type b-lactamases. The spread of CTX-M-type ESBLs is causing rapid, important and unpredictable changes in the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance. It underlines the need for strict surveillance. In this regard, it should be emphasized that testing molecules such as cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and ⁄ or cefpodoxime is essential for laboratory detection of isolates producing CTX-M enzymes, and that
1. Jacoby GA, Munoz-Price LS. The new b-lactamases. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 380–391. 2. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum b-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18: 657– 686. 3. Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum b-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14: 933–951. 4. Bonnet R. Growing group of extended-spectrum b-lactamases: the CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 1–14. 5. Rodriguez MM, Power P, Radice M et al. Chromosomeencoded CTX-M-3 from Kluyvera ascorbata: a possible origin of plasmid-borne CTX-M-1-derived cefotaximases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 4895–4897. 6. Olson AB, Silverman M, Boyd DA et al. Identification of a progenitor of the CTX-M-9 group of extended-spectrum b-lactamases from Kluyvera georgiana isolated in Guyana. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2112–2115. 7. Lartigue MF, Poirel L, Aubert D et al. In vitro analysis of ISEcp1B-mediated mobilization of naturally occurring b-lactamase gene blaCTX-M of Kluyvera ascorbata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1282–1286. 8. Poirel L, Lartigue MF, Decousser JW et al. ISEcp1B-mediated transposition of blaCTX-M in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 447–450. 9. Chen Y, Delmas J, Sirot J et al. Atomic resolution structures of CTX-M b-lactamases: extended spectrum activities from increased mobility and decreased stability. J Mol Biol 2005; 348: 349–362. 10. Ibuka AS, Ishii Y, Galleni M et al. Crystal structure of extended-spectrum b-lactamase Toho-1: insights into the molecular mechanism for catalytic reaction and substrate specificity expansion. Biochemistry 2003; 42: 10634–10643. 11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 16th informational supplement. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2006.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The experimental work on ESBLs carried out in our laboratory was supported in part by research grants from the European Commission (LSHM-CT-2003-503335, COBRA Specific Targeted Research Project), the Italian Ministry of Research and University (MIUR, PRIN 2005), and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. Owing to the limit on the number of references, it was not possible to cite all the original sources of the reviewed material. Consequently, recent review articles have mostly been cited for data that have already been referenced therein. The authors would like to acknowledge all the original scientific contributions relevant to the field that could not be cited owing to space limitations.
2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41
Rossolini et al.
12. Cartelle M, Del Mar TM, Molina F et al. High-level resistance to ceftazidime conferred by a novel enzyme, CTX-M32, derived from CTX-M-1 through a single Asp240–Gly substitution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 2308– 2313. 13. Bae IK, Lee BH, Hwang HY et al. A novel ceftazidimehydrolysing extended-spectrum b-lactamase, CTX-M-54, with a single amino acid substitution at position 167 in the omega loop. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58: 315–319. 14. Kimura S, Ishiguro M, Ishii Y et al. Role of a mutation at position 167 of CTX-M-19 in ceftazidime hydrolysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 1454–1460. 15. Pournaras S, Ikonomidis A, Kristo I et al. CTX-M enzymes are the most common extended-spectrum b-lactamases among Escherichia coli in a tertiary Greek hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54: 574–575. 16. Yan JJ, Hsueh PR, Lu JJ et al. Extended-spectrum b-lactamases and plasmid-mediated AmpC enzymes among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from seven medical centers in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1861–1864. 17. Edelstein M, Pimkin M, Palagin I et al. Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of CTX-M extended-spectrum blactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Russian hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 3724–3732. 18. Livermore DM, Hawkey PM. CTX-M: changing the face of ESBLs in the UK. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 451–454. 19. Hernandez JR, Martinez-Martinez L, Canton R et al. Nationwide study of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae producing extended-spectrum b-lactamases in Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2122–2125. 20. Luzzaro F, Mezzatesta M, Mugnaioli C et al. Trends in production of extended-spectrum b-lactamases among enterobacteria of medical interest: report of the second Italian nationwide survey. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 1659– 1664. 21. Mugnaioli C, Luzzaro F, De Luca F et al. CTX-M-type extended-spectrum b-lactamases in Italy: molecular epidemiology of an emerging countrywide problem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 2700–2706. 22. Eckert C, Gautier V, Saladin-Allard M et al. Dissemination of CTX-M-type b-lactamases among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in Paris, France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 1249–1255. 23. Eisner A, Fagan EJ, Feierl G et al. Emergence of Enterobacteriaceae isolates producing CTX-M extended-spectrum b-lactamase in Austria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 785–787. 24. Fang H, Lundberg C, Olsson-Liljequist B et al. Molecular epidemiological analysis of Escherichia coli isolates producing extended-spectrum b-lactamases for identification of nosocomial outbreaks in Stockholm, Sweden. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 5917–5920. 25. Brigante G, Luzzaro F, Perilli M et al. Evolution of CTX-Mtype b-lactamases in isolates of Escherichia coli infecting
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
CTX-M b-lactamases 41
hospital and community patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2005; 25: 157–162. Pitout JD, Nordmann P, Laupland KB et al. Emergence of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBLs) in the community. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 52–59. Ben-Ami R, Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S et al. Influx of extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae into the hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42: 925–934. Valverde A, Coque TM, Sanchez-Moreno MP et al. Dramatic increase in prevalence of fecal carriage of extendedspectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae during nonoutbreak situations in Spain. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 4769–4775. Brinas L, Moreno MA, Teshager T et al. Monitoring and characterization of extended-spectrum b-lactamases in Escherichia coli strains from healthy and sick animals in Spain in 2003. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 1262– 1264. Kojima A, Ishii Y, Ishihara K et al. Extended-spectrum-blactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from farm animals from 1999 to 2002: report from the Japanese Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 3533–3537. Carattoli A, Lovari S, Franco A et al. Extended-spectrum blactamases in Escherichia coli isolated from dogs and cats in Rome, Italy, from 2001 to 2003. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 833–835. Elliott E, Brink AJ, Van Greune J et al. In vivo development of ertapenem resistance in a patient with pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae with an extended-spectrum b-lactamase. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42: e95–e98. Munday CJ, Boyd DA, Brenwald N et al. Molecular and kinetic comparison of the novel extended-spectrum b-lactamases CTX-M-25 and CTX-M-26. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 4829–4834. Toleman MA, Bennett PM, Walsh TR. ISCR elements: novel gene-capturing systems of the 21st century? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006; 70: 296–316. Oliver A, Coque TM, Alonso D et al. CTX-M-10 linked to a phage-related element is widely disseminated among Enterobacteriaceae in a Spanish hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 1567–1571. Mulvey MR, Bryce E, Boyd D et al. Ambler class A extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in Canadian hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 1204–1214. Quinteros M, Radice M, Gardella N et al. Extended-spectrum b-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae in Buenos Aires, Argentina, public hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 2864–2867. Ryoo NH, Kim EC, Hong SG et al. Dissemination of SHV12 and CTX-M-type extended-spectrum b-lactamases among clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae and emergence of GES-3 in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56: 698–702.
2008 The Authors Journal Compilation 2008 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 14 (Suppl. 1), 33–41