The submillimeter rotation tunneling spectrum of (D2O)2

The submillimeter rotation tunneling spectrum of (D2O)2

CHEMICALPHYSICSLETTERS Volume 173,number 1 28 September 1990 The submillimeter rotation tunneling spectrum of ( D20)2 E. Zwart, J.J. ter Meulen and...

527KB Sizes 6 Downloads 22 Views

CHEMICALPHYSICSLETTERS

Volume 173,number 1

28 September 1990

The submillimeter rotation tunneling spectrum of ( D20)2 E. Zwart, J.J. ter Meulen and W. Leo Meerts Fjsisch Lboratorium,

Universityof Nijmegen, Toernooiveld, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received 14 June 1990

By direct absorption of submillimeter radiation in a planar supersonicjet, we have measured K,= 1+K,= 2 transitions of the fully deuterated water dimer (Da)* in the region between 350 and 430 GHz Severalpreviously unknown constants have been derived. The A-rotational constant is determined as 120327.492(32) MHz. The sum or the difference of the largest tunneling splittings for K,,= 1 and K,,= 2 is approximately 2 1 GHz. The tunneling matrix element hZY has been found to be a factor of 100 smaller than in (HaO)*.

1. Introduction The water dimer, (HzO)2, has been the subject of extensive studies during the past years (see refs. [ 1,21, and referencestherein ). It has been found that the vibrational ground state splits into six states as Ein , GHz 300*-

r

(H+N2

a result of tunneling. In fig. 1 this splitting is drawn schematically.Each of the six vibrational tunneling levels has its own rotational structure, which is that of a near-prolate symmetric top. The rotational structure is only indicated by drawing the first two K. levels. The various J levels for one K, are rather

1

L

c 2ooGl-b

I 1GHz t

I 2oGl-k

I

K,=O

K,.l

I

Ha=0

K,=l

Fie. 1. Energy-leveldiagram of the lowestlevels of (H10)2 and (Dz0)2. 0009-2614/90/%03.50 0 1990 - Elaevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland)

115

Volume 173,number 1

CHEMICALPHYSICSLETTERS

close together and are not drawn. In a first approximation this splitting can be described by two tunneling motions. The tunneling motion with the lowest barrier corresponds to a 180 ’ rotation of the hydrogen-accepting HZ0 monomer as a result of which the two hydrogen atoms are interchanged. This splits the vibrational ground state into two states, separated by approximately 200 GHz. These states are split again into three states by the interconversion tunneling motion in which the hydrogen donor/acceptor roles of the two HZ0 monomers are interchanged. The result is a state shifted upward, a state shifted downward and a (doubly degenerate) state which is not shifted from the position without interconversion tunneling. The energy difference between the two nondegenerate states is usually called the interconversion tunneling splitting and amounts approximately to 20 GHz. The fully deuterated species, ( Dz0)2, probably has a similar energy-level scheme. However, the tunneling splittings will be smaller. The expected energy level diagram is also drawn in fig. 1. In the theoretical model developed by Coudert and Hougen [ 3 1, which was used to fit all available experimental data of ( Hz0 )2, a high tunneling barrier was assumed. In particular for the internal rotation of the hydrogenaccepting Hz0 monomer, there may be some doubt about this assumption. The fully deuterated water dimer, (DzO)z, will be a good candidate to test the high-barrier assumption. Until now, only microwave measurements have been reported for (DzO)* [4-71. Dyke et al. [4] have measured AJ= 1 rotational transitions for K,,=2andK,=3,andAJ=OrftransitionsforKQ=2. Coudert et al. [ 5 ] and Odutola et al. [ 61 have measured AJ= 1 rotational and rotational-tunneling transitions for K, = 0. Suenram et al. [ 71 have extended the previous work. They have measured many transitions for K, = 0 and K, = 1. Transitions in all symmetry states were found. As a result of these microwave measurements, for many rotational constants accurate values are known for the various tunneling levels for K,=O and K,= 1; in addition, the interconversion tunneling splittings have been determined. The latter turned out to be approximately 1 GHz, i.e. a factor of 20 smaller than in (H,O)*. Since no ti,& 1 transitions were measured, the Arotational constant and the largest tunneling split116

28 Scptcmbcr 1990

ting are not known precisely from the rotational data. In this Letter we present measurements of submillimeter transitions from K, = 1 to K,= 2. We have found four of the six possible bands. With these new results, the A-rotational constant is obtained and several tunneling splittings are derived or estimated.

2. Experimental The spectrometer used in this work has been de scribed in detail in refs. [ 2,8,9]. The radiation used in this work is produced by generating harmonics of microwave radiation from klystrons. Most lines have been measured with the sixth harmonic of a 60 GHz klystron. The tuning range of the fundamental is 10 GHz and its power 100 mW. The harmonics are generated in an open-structure multiplier with a Schottky barrier diode and radiated in free space by an antenna. The harmonic needed for the experiment is filtered out with a monochromator. The radiation is detected by a 1.5 K Si bolometer in a direct absorption experiment. The dimers are formed in a continuous expansion of Ar and D20, produced with a slit nozzle. The slit is 4 cm long and 15 pm wide. The backing pressure is 500 Torr and the pressure in the vacuum chamber 0.05 Torr. The vacuum chamber is pumped by a 4000 m3/h roots pump. By passing Ar over DtO, we produce a gas mixture with a few per cent. D20 in Ar. The S/N ratio of the measured lines was at most 10 with an RC time of 3 s.

3. Results In order to facilitate the understanding of the observed bands, the K,= 1 and K, = 2 levels are drawn with enlarged tunneling splittings in fig, 2. The symmetries in the figure are the symmetries of the rotational-vibrational tunneling wavefunctions in G16 [ 10 1. For K,> 0, each state is split due to asymmetry splitting and the following rules hold for the symmetries of the two components of a X-type doublet: For the upper component the symmetry on the left (right) must be taken for Jeven (odd). For the lower component the symmetry on the left (right) must be taken for J odd (even). E’ levels between Af , Bf

Volume 173, number I

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

T 5ymm. weight A;

21

A;

3

Bf

15

B$

6

Et

18

Fig. 2. Energy-level diagram for the K,= 1 and K,= 2 levels of ( DzO)> The allowed transitions between vibrational tunneling states and the symmetries of the rotational-vibrational tunneling wavefunctions and their statistical weights are also given. For the symmetries of the two components of a K-type doublet, the following rules hold: For the upper component the symmetry on the let? (right ) must be taken for J even (odd). For the lower component the symmetry on the left (right) must be taken for Jodd (even).

levels are called E: and E’ levels between A;, B: levels are called Ei, E: and El are not symmetries from G16, but are convenient to distinguish the various E’ levels [ 7,111. Also given in the figure are the statistical weights. Selection rules for electric dipole transitions are E: ++E:, E: -Ej, Af-A:, A+A$ ,B: -B: , B: -BZ . Transitions E:-E: are not forbidden, but are assumed to be very weak in the high-barrier limit [ 111. The various transitions between K,= 1 and & = 2 are drawn. Each arrow indicates a set of transitions following the above symmetry selection rules and the additional selection rules AJ=O, k 1. It is clear that the spectrum will consist of six bands, similar to vibrational bands, with P, Q and R branches. We will denote the bands by the symmetries of the initial states (e.g. (A:, B, ) ), and a line from a band by the J tran-

28 September 1990

sition and the symmetry of the initial state (e.g. R(4)At ). We have found four of the six possible bands. The other bands are probably too weak to observe. It should be noted that the sign of the largest tunneling splitting cannot unambiguously be determined by theory, and further that this sign can be different for different K,. This will be discussed in the next section. Fig. 3 is a part of the Q branch of the (A:, B, ) band. This represents only one half of the Q branch. (In this part the lines are rather close together, ) Due to asymmetry doubling, every line from a band appears twice. Because of the low intensity of the lines, the bands were not found in initial, fast scans. In that case only Ar-D20 bands were observed [ 121. Next, in slow scans, a few lines of (D20)* were detected. To distinguish them from lines of complexes with Ar, we replaced Ar by Kr. With the help of the known microwave transitions and their spectroscopic constants, the other lines could be predicted and were then found. The asymmetry constants for K,= 1 from ref. [ 71 were especially helpful in assigning the observed spectra. (The asymmetry splittings in K, = 2 are small. ) We were only able to detect Q- and R-branch transitions. No P-branch lines were detected, though their positions are very accurately known from combination differences with microwave results. For ( Hz0 ), it was found [ 9,131 that the P lines are a few times weaker than Q or R lines. From fig_3 it is clear,

Fig. 3. Part of the Q branch of the (A:, Bi ) band. The RC time is 3 s. The distance between the frequency markers is IO MHz.

117

Volume 173, number 1

CHEMICAL PHYSICSLETTERS

that we cannot afford to loose more than a factor of 3 in intensity. We therefore assume that the sensitivity is too low to detect P-branch lines. For the two bands of the E* levels, microwave measurements have been made in both initial and final states, so for these bands combination differences can be used to check our assignments. The combination differences agreed to within 0.1 MHz, which is approximately the accuracy of our frequency measurements. For the other two bands only microwave measurements in the initial states are available, so only combination differences can be calculated between two submillimeter transitions with a common upper state. Unfortunately, this was not possible for the present results because of the lack of P lines. Additionally the relative intensities of the observed transitions confirm the assignments. Lines in the bands of E’ symmetry show no intensity alternation, whereas the other two bands have an intensity alternation. The latter was to be expected from the ratio of statistical weights .of A: and B: symmetry 2 1/ 15. Due to the low intensity of the lines, the exact intensity ratio is difficult to measure. However, a comparison of the strengths of two lines from a K-type doublet clearly shows intensity alternations. Furthermore, bands which could not be detected are, due to their statistical weights, appreciably weaker than the observed ones. (See fig. 2.) The four bands were fitted separately to a nearprolate symmetric-top formula. The same procedure was used by Suenram et al. [ 7 1. The transitions were assumed to be c-type. The constants, given in table 5, have their usual meanings. The parameter d is the distortion in the asymmetry constant for K, = 1. The constant c describes the asymmetry splitting in K, = 2 and is the same as used by Dyke et al. [ 41, i.e. the asymmetry splitting in KG=2 is given by c( J- 1) x J( J+ 1) (J+ 2). In all cases we obtained acceptable fits as can be seen from tables l-4. The resulting parameters are listed in table 5.

28 September 1990

Table 1 Observed and calculated frequencies for the (ET, E: ) band in MHz Transition

Observed

Ohs. - talc.

Q(2)& QCVEf Q(3)@ Q(3IEi Q(4)& Q(4)E: Q(5)E: Q(5)& Q(6)& Q(6)E:

350543.41 350722.40 350439.37 350797.43 350300.63 350897.51 350127.00 351022.61 3499 18.63 351172.94

-0.01 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.02 -0.02 -0.03 0.00 0.01

R(l)E: R(l)& R(2)& WW: W)E,’ R(3)&

372324.02 372383.62 383108.23 383286.97 393855.36 394212.61 404564.74 405159.59 415235.58 416126.84

0.02 0.00 0.00 -0.01 -0.03 -0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 -0.01

R(4)%

R(4)E: W5)E: R(S)Ei

Table 2 Observed and calculated frequencies for the (ET, ET ) band in MHz Transition

Observed

ohs. -talc.

Q(2)E: Q(2))% Q(3IEi Q(VE: Q(4)E: Q(4)Ei Q(5)& Q(5)E:

371248.93 371348.24 371154.70 371353.46 371029.15 371360.50 370872.50 371369.52

0.02 -0.02 0.00 0.03 -0.04 0.02 0.02 -0.02

R(I)Ei R(l)E: R(2)E: R(2)E, R(3)Ei W3)E: R(4)% R(4)&

393012.64 393045.73 403798.16 403897.49 414549.95 414748.48 425267.19 425597.94

0.01 -0.01 -0.03 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 -0.01

4. Discussion The standard deviations of the fits are somewhat smaller than the estimated uncertainty of the measured frequencies. The constants from the tit agree 118

very well with those obtained from refs. [ 4,7 1. This proves that the assignment of the two bands which could not be checked with combination differences must be correct. From the results of the fit several

28 September 1990

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

Volume 173, number 1

Table 3 Observed and calculated frequencies for the (B: , Ai ) band in MHz

Table 4 Observed and calculated frequencies for the (A:, Bi ) band in MHz

Transition

Observed

Obs. -talc.

Transition

Observed

Obs. - talc.

QGP: Q(2)& Q(3)Ai Q(3P: Q(4)B: Q(4)& Q(5)& Q(5P:

370282.21 370381.32 370189.67 370387.86 370066.38 370396.80 369912.50 370408.33

0.00

0.03 0.02 -0.02 0.00 -0.03 -0.01 0.02

Q(2M: Qt2)Bi

3i2164.77 372264.07 372869.49 372268.17 371942.44 372273.67 371783.88 372280.87

-0.01 -0.04 0.04 0.02 -0.01 -0.02 0.00 0.01

R(l)Ai R(l)% R(2)B: R(2)& R(3)& R(3)B: N4)B: R(4)&

392045.05 392078.06 402831.91 402930.86 413585.42 413183.45 424305.09 424635.00

-0.02 -0.03 0.06 -0.02 -0.01 0.02 -0.01 0.00

393929.15 j93962.28 404713.88 404813.17 415464.45 415662.96 426180.13 426510.84

0.00 0.03 -0.02 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00

Q(J)&

QOM: Q(4)G Q(4)& Q(5)%

Q(W: B(l)Bi B(l)A: B(2)A:

R(2)Bi R(3)& B(3)A: B(4)A: B(4)Bi

Table 5 Molecular constants of (D20)* and their errors obtained from the least squares fit of the various bands. The errors in the constants are the errors which result from the estimated uncertainty in the observed frequencies (0.1 MHz 1. The standard deviations are approximately a factor of 4 smaller. u. (band origin), 8”) 8’, B” -C” and u (stand. dev.) in MHz. D”, D’, d” and c’ in lrHz

W, VCI

8” D" p-c d

I,

D' C' u

Et)

350647.442 (84) 5430.505 (14) 35.45(25) 59.661(16) 0.42( 12) 5428.085 (15) 35.46(26) 1.722(62) 0.017

(Et, Ei)

(B:,Ai)

371343.19(11) 5432.934( 18) 35.55 (47) 33.1133(64)

370374.85(11) 5432.740( 18) 35.51(47) 33.0282( 64)

372260.18(11) 5433.100(8) 35.79(47) 33.1079(64)

5425.493(22) 34.40(53) 0.43(11) 0.019

5425.549(22) 34.10(53) 0.45(11) 0.022

5425.471(22) 34.59(53) 0.43(11) 0.019

constants which were previously unknown can be derived. This will be discussed below and the results are summarized in table 6. The interconversion tunneling splitting between (A:, Bi ) and (B:, Ai ) levels for K,=2 can easily be calculated and the result is 808.72( 16) MHz. Comparing this splitting with those for & = 0 ( 1172 MHz) and K,=l (1077 MHz), we find that it strongly decreases with increasing K,. A similar re-

Table 6 Constants and their errors obtained fmm the observed bands. Av,, is the interconversion tunneling splitting between (A:, Bi ) and (B: , Ai ) levels for K,= 2. All quantities am in MHz Constant

Value

Avia,

808.72( 16) - 6.420(34) 120327.492132)

h2” A

119

Volume 173, number 1

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

sult was found for (H,O)*. There exists another tunneling motion in the water dimer in which the hydrogens of the hydrogen-donating water monomer are interchanged. This tuneling motion causes shifts of the energy levels. Coudert and Hougen [ 14] proposed that for ( Hz0) 2 and ( Dz0)2, levels of E symmetry are moved upward for K, even and downward for Kaodd, respectively. For levels of A and B symmetry, the levels shift downward and upward for K, even and odd, respectively. If we neglect the dependence on the rotational tunneling state this shift is given by 1hzvI. Here hzu is a matrix element from ref. [ 14 1, whose value is proposed to be negative. It will be clear that as a result of this tunneling motion, the K,= l-+2 bands will be shifted upward (E levels) or downward (A, B levels) by 2 1hzul . The band origins yield 1,&I. From the results of table 5, we calculate h = - 6.420( 34) MHz. This value is approximately a’iactor of 100 smaller than in (H,O), [ 151. If one neglects the dependence of the tunneling shift, described by hZvon the rotational-tunneling state, the mean of the band origins of the two bands of E symmetry, p, obeys 8=3At

12hj,l ,

where A is the rotational constant along the a axis.

(a)

28 September 1990

Substituting r and hzu in this equation, we find A= 120327.492(32) MHz. Probably the most interesting quantity which cannot be determined from microwave spectroscopy concerns the largest tunneling motion for (DzO)z. From the submillimeter results, we can obtain information about this quantity. However, there is some ambiguity which depends on the ordering of the levels. There are three possibilities, depicted in fig. 4: In fig, 4a the ordering for K,= 1 is the same as in (H,O),. This assumption is supported by the observation that transitions in the (ET, ET ) band are approximately 1.5 times stronger than those in the (EF , EL ) band. Fig. 4a implies that the tunneling splitting in K, = 2 is 2 1 GHz larger than the tunneling splitting in K,= 1. If the levels are ordered as in fig. 4b the splitting in K,= 2 is 21 GHz smaller than the splitting in K,= 1, i.e. a decrease of the tunneling splitting is found similar to that for the interconversion tunneling splitting. The ordering in fig. 4c implies that the sum of the splittings in K. = 1 and K,= 2 is 21 GHz. In that case, the tunneling splitting would be a factor of 20 smaller than for (H,O)z, which is the same factor as for the interconversion tunneling splitting. Though we have a weak preference for the assumption of fig. 4a, we cannot unambiguously prove either of the assumptions.

b)

Fig. 4. The various possible assignments of the observed bands. El and Ez denote the levels for which the possible rotational-vibrational tunneling symmetries are Et and E: , respectively.

120

Volume 173, number 1

CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS

Acknowledgement The authors are grateful to Professor J. Reuss and Dr. J. Hougen for having encouraged them to work on this problem. The authors wish to thank Mr. E. van Leeuwen, Mr. J. Holtkamp and Mr. F. van Rijn for their technical assistance. This work was financially supported by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (FOM/NWO).

References [ 1] G.T. Fraser, Intern. Rev. Phys. Chem., to be published. [2] E. Zwart, J.J. ter Meulen and W.L. Meerts, Chem. Phys. Letters 166 (1990) 500. [ 31 L.H. Coudert and J.T. Hougen, J. Mol. Spectry. 139 ( 1990) 259. [4] T.R. Dyke, KM. Mack and J.S. Muenter, J. Chem. Phys. 66 (1977) 498.

28 September 1990

[S] LA. Couden, F.J. Lovas, R.D. Suenmm and J.T. Hougen, J. Chetn. Phys. 87 ( 1987) 6290. [6] J.A. Gdutola, T.A. Hu, D. Prinslow, S.E. O’Dell and T.R. Dyke, J. Cbem. Phys. 88 ( 1988) 5352. [ 71 RD. Suenram, G.T. Fraser and F.J. Lovas, J. Mol. Spectry. 138 (1989) 440. [N] P. Verhoeve, E. Zwart, M. Drabbels, M. Versluis, J.J. ter Meulen, A. Dymanus and D. h&Lay, Rev. Sci. Instr., to be published, [ 91E. Zwart, J.J. ter Meulen, W.L. Meerts and L.H. Coudert, in preparation. [lo] T.R. Dyke, J. Chem. Phys. 66 (1977) 492. [ 111G.T. Fraser, R.D. Suenram and L.H. Coudert, J. Chem. Phys. 90 (1989) 6077. [ 121 E. Zwart, J.J. ter Meulen and W.L. Meerts, in preparation. [ 131 K.L. Busarow, RC. Cohen, G.A. Blake, K.B. Laughlin, Y.T. Lee and R.J. Saykally, J. Chem. Phys. 90 (1989) 3937. [14]L.H.CoudertandJ.T.Hougen,J.Mo1.Spectry.130(1988) 86. [ 151 G.T. Fraser, R.D. Suemam, L.H. Coudert and R.S. Frye, J. Mol. Spectry. 137 ( 1989) 244.

121