Pharmacological
Research
Communications.
THE TRANSITION
Vol. 17, No. 5, 1985
FROM A FIXED
463
RATIO TO A FIXED
INTERVAL
SCHEDULE
OF REINFORCEMFNT IN HYPO AND HYPERTHYROID RATS.
Fundarb
A.,
Molinengo
Institute
of
L.
and Cassone
Pharmacology
C. Raffaello
M.C.
and Pharmacognosy
31 - 10125
Turin
Received
- School
of
Pharmacy
- Italy in final form
6 March
1985
SU"IMARY The modification
of
behavior
roidism
were
studied
when
the
changed
from
a fixed
ratio
to
The conditions with
of hypo
a chronic
xine.
of
the
determined
by evaluation
the
levels
of
Hyperthyroidism
(learning) in
high
sion
of
the
the
a fixed
in
behaviour
learning
were
of basal
and of
thyroid
obtained 1-thyro=
activity
metabolic
rate
was and of
T4. no modification to
the
In
of
the
rat
new experimental
hypothyroidism.
hypothyroidism. rat
the
was
interval.
modifications of
and hyperthy=
reinforcement
of methimazole
adapting
was found
dent
of
in
of
and hyperthyroidism
caused
A difficulty
by hypo
schedule
administration
The level
plasma
caused
This
low
situation
effect
is
hypothyroidism
may interfere
with
behaviour.
evi=
a depres=
the
modification
process.
INTRODUCTION The thyroid heimer
et
protein reported hydroxylase Singhal
hormones
al.
,1974)
synthesis that
can enter
and influence
(Verity
et
hypothyroidism activity
(1976)
0031-6989/85/050463-08/$03.00/0
observed
in
al.
mature
an increase
mature
the
aminoacid
,1977).
caused the
the
brain
Emlen
an elevation brain of
uptake
0 1985
and
and others(1972) of
and Rastogi tyrosine
(Oppen=
tyrosin= and
and trypto=
The
Italian
Pharmacological
Society
464
Pharmacological
phan
in
the
Moreover
of
Hoffman
offered the
brain
of
cholinergic thyroid
1974). actions
contrast
of
dence
of
thyroid
the
et
evident in
the
dramatic,
man (Whybrow
and Ferrel and clinical
subjects,
adult
the
often
neurochemical
adult
animals of
with
Finally,an
there
is
evi=
there
is
no
thyroidectomy
reviews
of Eayrs,
may be a consequence
of
the
actions
We now report
darb
adult
(1981)
hormones
system.
in
(see
inconsistencies
ascertain
with
nervous
as a result
hormones
sensitivity
rats
thyroid
evident,
in
behaviour
of
the
l-triiodothyronine.
and others
causes
hormones that
with
Vol. 17, No. 5, 1985
or of 1960
and of
and Oppenheimer,l979).
These cient
the
these
suggests
modification
Schwartz
to
thyroid
which
giving
iunction
Communications,
(1947),Baruch
of
modifications
In
treated
an interaction
section
behavioural
rats
and others
evidence
abnormal
adult
Research
of
the
al .,1983)
behavioural
methods
the
hormones.
thyroid
results
a behavioural
of
obtained
test
exhibited
in
which
in
an insuffi=
utilized
hypo
and hyperthyroid
previous
a considerable
to
researches
(Fun=
sensitivity.
METHODS Twenty used.
iive
male
The animals,
experiments,were about
20°C)
with
The single was used dule
lasted
morning
for
lo-12
saltz
weighing
200-250
kept
in
food
and water
lever
and all
the
the
rats(Wistar
groups other
for hours of four
groups
Skinner
the
rats
(1 reinforcement
session
five
albino
every
15 minutes.
were
in
were
beginning
cages
of
ad libitum. rats
trained
of to
the
Grason
&Stadler
ratio
sche=
a fixed on the
lever).
Each
were
performed
kept
without
before
the
trials.
Rats
were
The rats
one group a solution
Serva-Feinbiochemica,Heidelberg)
the
(temperature
The experiments week.
drank
five
strain)
the
10 responses
per
groups
g at
box for
5 days
5 animals:
of
derived
drank of
were water
food
divided
in
(controls),
l-thyroxine
2mg/liter
in
(Naor
l-thyro=
Pharmacological
xine
Research
Communications,
4 mg/liter
mazole
or of
drank
about
about
28 ml/day/rat.
After of
The rats
35 ml/day/rat.
20 davs
of
reinforcement
interval
schedule:
bolic
after
rate
et
was used.Oxygen
fixed
for
of
to
the
first
first
to
vein
of
immunosorbant
The procedure
the
meta=
method
given
S.p.A.,Milan)
in
small
animals
was transformed of in
the
D'Amour
in et
a1.(19691
a few ml of
rat.
assay,
suggested
5 min
100 minutes.
(Terzano
minute
determined
after
The basal
consumption
were
a fixed
was evaluated
according
indications
less,
schedule
to
lasted
trials.
the
drank
given
trials
per
groups
the time
response
oxygen
caudal
T4 (Enzym urn linked
the
The apparatus
T4 levels
from
treatment,
interval
consumption
The serum
was used.
groups
was measured
according
collected
The methimazole
and hyperthyroidism
determination
cal/sqm/hr
l-thyroxine
interval
a1.(1969).
or of methi=
two
the
the
(BVR)
by D'Amour the
only
of hypo
immediately
the
pharmacological
The fixed
The level
250 mg/liter
of
was changed
was reinforced.
for
methimazole
500 mg/liter.
465
Vol. 17, No. 5, 1985
blood (R)
The Enzymum-Test
Boehringer,Mannheim)
by the
above
firm
of
the
controls
with
low
was
followed. RFSULTS The basal 0.83
In
cal/sqm/hr.
l-thyroxine
the
drinking to
metabolic
the
methimazole
induced
low
doses
a reduction
test
indicates
doses
( ~40.01 not
of
significant
of
doses
of
and in
l-thyroxine
and high the
was 59.16+_
it
the
rats
increased
concentrations
BMR respectively
of to
cal/sqm/hr. that
l-thyroxine
),while
cal/sqm/hr of
The low
47.19k1.40
are
treated
concentration
and to
by high
significant
rats
cal/sqm/hr.
The Student's
(BMR)
BMR was 61.00+0.54
caused
49.85k2.65
the
higher
64.57+1.03
rate
the
the
metabolism or of
methimazole
BMR modifications
( p > 10% >.
modifications are caused
by
466
Pharmacological
The T4 level increased
the
rats
high
were
respectively
T41evels
The differences highly
between
significant
On the and the fixed
number
ratio
luation
or low
to the
of the
results
These last
20 minutes
experimental the first
number
bability
of
controls
and treated
ber
a casual
cent
differences
were
animals. N20'
ces between
reported controls
values
indicate
in
number
centages increased.
of the
per
by Skinner(l938).
animal
and in
of the C-T
between
by rats
trials
(C)
the
differences
in
the
and in
(T),were
to estimate
the
various
given
administration
(P)
eva=
20 minutes
control
the
of responses
differences?.100
was used
from
cal= pro=
between
- NlOO' ,100 between the num= N20' during the 100 minutes of expe=
calculated.
The results
the
first each
in
test
result
always
and by treated
quantitative
suggested
for
drug
of responses/reinforcement
riment
method
made in the
after
were
was changed
per reinforcement
The Mann-Whitney
rats
the
of experiment trials
~g/lOOml.
of reinforcements
by control
The per cent
culated.
The per
number
we measured
of responses
corresponding
groups
the
of experiment
20 minutes
and 1.85kO.15
For
were
groups.
number
the
given
the
measurements
of methimazole
interval.
reinforcement,following
rats
).
of reinforcements
fixed
the
of l-thyroxine.
and treated
measured
of responses
ml and it
ml in
concentrations
controls
schedule
pg/lOO
1.25+0.17
Vol. 17. No. 5, 1985
pg/lOO
or 4mgfliter
( p < 0.01
tracings,we
when the
18.05+0.40
2mg/liter
drinking
Communications,
was 2.7OkO.20
and to
respectively
In the
rats
controls
to 6.4050.25
drinking the
in
Research
indicate
in
table
and treated
that
drug
1 are the rats.
administration
per
Therefore caused
of responses/reinforcement,while that
A statistically
the
number significant
cent
differen=
positive a reduction negative
per=
of responses/reinforcement reduction
of the
re=
Pharmacological
Table
Research
Communications,
1 - Differences
treated
between
rats(n*=number
forcement
given
interval
in
schedule.
estimated
with
controls(nl=number
of items) the
first
in
the
20minutes
The probability
the
467
Vol. 17, No. 5, 1985
number
items)
interval
in
the
fixed
result
(P) was
test.
Per cent differences
nl
n2
P
Low hypothyroidism
+66.60
5
5
0.008
High
hypothyroidism
- 9.34
5
5
0.421
Low hyperthyroidism
+ 5.63
5
5
0.50
High
-39.93
5
5
0.111
Table
hyperthyroidism
2 - Differences
cement
given
in
last
the
in
with
first
the number
The probability the
Mann-Whitney
Treatment
of responses/reinfor=
20 minutes(nl=number
20 minutes(n2=number
xed interval. mated
the
between
of
of of the
items)
of a casual
result
items)
and
trial
at fi
(P) was estL
test.
Per cent differences
nl
n2
P
Controls
+82.76
5
5
0.004
Low hypothyroidism
+47.28
5
5
0.075
High
hypothyroidism
+58.30
5
5
0.111
Low hyperthyroidism
+7a.53
5
5
0.048
High
+87.42
5
5
0.004
hyperthyroidism
and
of responses/rein
of a casual
Mann-Whitney
Treatment
of
468
Pharmacological
soonsesfreinforcement observed
only
in
in
the
hypothyroidism. is
In
The data ween the min
and
reported
the
the
per
last
the
other
and
reduction
hypothyroid
responses/reinforcement
of
experiment
but
condition
in
to
trial
in
the
hyperthyroid
of
the
responses is
the
which
the
differences
first
20 schedule
schedule.
rats
there
is
a con=
reinforcement.
first
of
to
are
bet=
the
some reduction
from
there
controls.
interval
per
low
differences in
in
a fixed
of
the
cent
given
the
was
situations to
per
reinforcement
these
the
Vol. 17, No. 5, 1985
experiment
experimental
2 are
groups,there
of
in
difference
table
20 min
Communications,
20 min of
rats
was changed
controls
siderable
of
the
in
responses in
first
significant
of reinforcement In
group
all
no statistically
the
Research
not
the
In
the
number
last
20 min
statistically
significant.
DISCUSSION The evaluation indicate
that
obtain two
the
BMR and of
conditions the
schedule
transition
to
of
pharmacological
pressive the
(table action
the
cement comparing
which
the data
limit
of
by the
table
and high)
a fixed
to reduce
the
of
1 response
rate in
with
number
rat of
20 min
the
2 to
the
of
of
responses
reduction
in per
determi= reinfor=
may be evaluated data
a de=
of reinforcement.
behaviour
experiment
five
caused
first
new schedule the
and
interval
the
as an evaluation
interfere
100 min of of
to
of
in
be taken
the
us to
responses/reinforcement
might
caused
reduction
the
has
treatment
of a depression
during
the
the
l),may
responses
The weight
ratio
rat
T4
and high).
a fixed
a theoretical
A reduction
experiment
ning
from
(low
(low
of
allowed
hyperthyroidism
reinforcement
of responding
by the
of
concentrations
treatment
of hypothyroidism
of
minutes.
plasma
pharmacological
two conditions
In
of
of
of
table
1.
Pharmacological
Research
There the
is
in
reduction
not
in
beginning
differ
from that
rat
to
On the
in
the
the to
that
in is
of
the
fixed
the
rats
20 min
in
of
the
rat
there the
to
thyroidism
defines
this
in
interfere
may be noted
of
the
have
which
the
necessitate different behavioural
by the the
of
is
of adapting of
the
20 minutes
in
not
the in
case
the
in
first
no indication
of
data
2 in=
of
of
table
these
rats
a
in
reinforcement. as the to
process
adjust
that damage
the in
doubts
of
the
rat
low the
hype=
to
for
situation
for
only
room
depression
between
by means
to new situations.
causes leaves
found
hype=
reduction
last
is
experimental
been
(Cassone
difficulty
and the
differences
low
depression
we may conclude
effect
also
This
hypothyroidism:
able
This
the
number
This
hyperthyroidism
in that
decay
obtaining
becomes
and not
hypothyroidism
which
of responses
learning
definition
process.
memory
the
2).
of
of
situation.
difficulty
new schedule
ability
of
1) there
evident
the
of
in
high
results
conditions
the
behaviour
is
These
2) does
in
shown
(table
an animal
According
thyroidism
of
l).The
(table
modify
experiment.
(table
(table
experiment
controls.
determine
trial
Kreezer(l971)
might
rats
situation
experiment
to
learning
the
the
and
responses/reinforcement
does not
of
conditions
that
of which
in
the
might
interval
depression
adapting
end of
rats
experiment
the
responses/reinforcement
of
dicate
of
a reduction
experimental
of
hyperthyroid
new experimenta.
20 minutes
behaviour
number
the
the
contrary,
first
the
rats
found
to
the
20 min
hyperthyroidism
there
rat
first
to
adapt
thyroidism
between
hyperthyroid
the
indicate the
the
469
Vol. 17, No. 5, 1985
no difference
controls
from
Communications,
low
behaviour
we used.
It
and high
hype=
modifications
of
and Molinengo,l981).
These
an explanation,emphasize
the
levels
of
thyroid
activity
actions
of
thyroid
hormones.
observations, importance in
the
study
of
470
Pharmacological
Research
Communications,
Vol. 17, No. 5. 1985
REFERENCES BARUCH G.B.,Y.EGOZI,Y.KLOOG,S.MASHIACH,H.SOKOLOWSKY. nology
Endocri=
=,235,1981.
CASSONE M.C.
and L.MOLINENGO,
D'AMOUR F.E.,F.R.BLOOD ry work
Sci.
and A.D.BELDEN
in mammalian
Chicago-London,
Life
physiology
Jr.
Part
The University
EAYRS J.T.,Brit.Med.Bull.
2,1983,1981. Manual
for
I Exp.25,3rd
of Chicago
Press,
laborato= edn. 1969.
l6,122,1960.
EMLEN W.,D.S.SEGAL
and A.J.MANDEL,Science
FUNDARO' A.,M.C.CASSONE
and L.MOLINENGO,
pharmacol.&Biol.Psychiat. HOFFMAN F.,E.J.HOFFMAN
=,79,1972. Progr.Neuro-Psycho=
2,57,1983. and J.TALESNIK,
Amer.J.Physiol.
148,
689,1947. KREEZER G.L.,in Farris
The rat
in
and J.Q.Griffith
York,p.
laboratory
investigation.
Jr.
Publishing
Hafner
ed E.J. Company,
New
203,1971.
OPPENHEIMER J.H.,H.L.SCHWARTZ
and M.I.SURKS,Endocrinology
2,
897,1974. RASTOGI R.B.
and R.L.SINGHAL,
J.Pharmac.Exptl.Ther.
198,609,
1976. SCHWARTZ H.L.
and J.H.OPPENHEIMER,
and Treatment pp139
of Disease
Pergamon
Press,
in The Thyroid,Physiology
edts.
Hershman
J.M.
and G.A.Bray,
Oxford,1979.
SKINNER B.F.
The Behaviour
Appleton
Century-Crofts,Inc.
of Organism. New York,
VERITY M.A.,W.J.BROWN,M.K.CHEUNG
7th edn,pp.130-131
,
1938.
and G.J.CZER,
J.Neurochem.
2&853,1977. WHYBROWP. and R.FERREL, vior.
ed.A.J.Prange
in The thyroid Jr.,
~~5-28,
axis,
drugs
Raven Press,
New York,
1974. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. This
research
was supported
by MPI Grant
and beha=
60%,1983