Nuclear Instruments and Methods North-Holland, Amsterdam
in Physics
THE UNISOR NUCLEAR
ORIENTATION
I.C.
Research
B40/41
423
(1989) 423-428
FACILITY
GIRIT
Vanderbilt Uniuerslty, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Nashudle, Tennessee 37235, USA, UNISOR, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA, and Joint Institute for Heauy Ion Research, HHIRF, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
The combination of an on-line isotope separator and a dilution refrigerator has increased the applicability of the nuclear orientation technique to a wide range of nuclei, especially those very far from stability. The UNISOR nuclear orientation facility (UNISOR/NOF) has recently become operational. The following is an overall view of the UNISOR system and recent results.
[6,7]
1. Introduction
and internal
systems The
major
developments
nuclear
orientation
decade
can be summarized
a dilution after
production
by this
relaxation
method
of
another
problems
associated of
eliminated.
There
type: at
NICOLE
been
second
in
FRG major
on oriented
tems.
are
of this
the DOLIS-
recent
[3]. The
development
only to long-lived
systems [l],
very
Switzerland
Up to this decade
applied
materials
addition,
FOLBIS
sys-
to an accelerator of the past decade
magnetic
resonance
spin
nuclear
field gradient
relaxation
hyperfine
the NMR/ON
technique
was
nance
was considered
(For
rightfully
tion of the nuclear with
nuclear
technique state
g-factor
of
in combination or isomeric
limitations
nuclei.
Furthermore, measurement The
of the ability
0 Elsevier Publishing
Science
this of the
last decade
has
to detect
(Y, p
Publishers
Division)
B.V.
correlations ments) spin ments
states)
and
for the first time and can in the rare-earth
stability.
of on-line
region.
in the solid-state
studies
is the nuclear This of
III. NUCLEAR
contri-
especially
spectroscopy
is due partly
to the
such
as angular
coincidence
measure-
(reduced
to extensive
isotope
the major
technique,
techniques,
intensity
and partly
field,
orientation
of traditional (low
the mea-
the double-reso-
[12] which was used to study
orientation,
or in-beam
Auo, of the
see ref. [13].)
nuclear
ground
the
field gradient,
that enables
g [ll];
spectroscopy
on-line
determining
include
on oriented
splitting,
technique
for studies
of the nuclear far from
spin
innova-
[lo] as a means of measur-
i6’TbTb,
bution
of nuclei
isotopes.
to 1985,
mag-
nuclear
passage
of the NO applications
In the nuclear
a powerful
also seen the development
Physics
applica-
field prior
provides
of the implanted
(North-Holland
method
a very accurate
0168-583X/89/$03.50
of
B and
dilute
recent
due to an electric
method
system,
field interac-
field
of NMR/ON,
quadrupole
spin echo
as a model
resonance
short-lived
provides
The success
that the on-line
orientation
magnetic
for directly
spins
technique
proved
systems.
the from
solid-state
hyperfine
The
adiabatic
of the sign of
NMR/ON
the
orientation,
developed
electric
a review
of
changes
of the low-temperature in
damage.
area
interaction
a rare-earth
times
[6] on some of the In and
in the
V_,; a novel
in on-line
the hyperfine
nuclear
of modulated
has
nuclei
eq), thermometry,
radiation
nuclei (MAPON),
serve
Ag isotopes
mostly
technique
of
a-detection
anisotropy
of static
(both
force
and
orientation
the
structural
technique
parameters
brute
in
nuclei.
the electric netism,
of
the
the application
tion (HFI)
ing the weak
(see review by Herzog
of
the measurement
surement
by KOOL
is a measure
[4]. tech-
that
A,
gives a
measurements
with oriented fact
orientation
included
e.g. higher and
importance
the
to daughter
sys-
with on-line
The
Traditionally,
and long search
the first NMR/ON
states.
a-radiation
by on-line
this technique
temperatures
in
in on-line term
for B-particles
advantages,
higher
lies
radiation
of the dipole
function
in connection
systems
[5]). Due to the need for high statistics to be incompatible
l/2
NMR/ON, isotopes
for the resonance,
at
tions,
[2], the UNISOR/NOF a
is not on-line
nuclei,
the
by diffusion
host
Belgium
and,
the use of the nuclear
nique
the
England
USA,
at CERN,
tem in Bonn,
the insolubility
at Leuven,
Ridge,
is that
of practical
effects
parent
the
by ion implan-
method
number
distribution
technique
The
> 10 s. Since
are now four on-line
at Daresbury,
Oak
The
with
method.
directly
of this
impurities
the KOOL
COLD
the
is due to the nuclear-spin
advantage
techniques
stability
T,,2 of nuclei which can
nuclei under study are produced tation,
far from
T,. which is typically
time,
the last
the use of
and electromagnetic
extension
limit on the half-lives
be studied
during First,
nuclei
at an accelerator
the angular
low-temperature
as follows.
to cool
is a major
principal
the
field that took place
refrigerator
selection,
in
bremsstrahlung
[8,9]. The occurrence
separators
population technical with
of lowdevelop-
accelerators
PHYSICS/ASTROPHYSICS
424
I. C. Girit / LJNISOR nuclear orientation facility
which made access Thus,
coupled
spectroscopy, ground-
to nuclei
far from stability
with gamma-ray nuclear
orientation
experiments
spin
static
and excited-level
dipole and electric and long-lived
quadrupole
isomers,
and,
most
tion multipolarities
of almost
decay.
A detailed
ments
of
magnetic
quadrupole
moments
techniques
respectively. ments The [16].
mixing
parameter because
phases
ability
depends things
of the electric
on can
square
spe-
principle
models
This
is
values,
a matrix
(b) tion,
tell
prob-
of
a spherical
A = 150 region
to those
of a deformed
Fig.
upon
crossing
the
of
host. a
Shape
coexistence
a structure
occurs
in the
boundary
needs
accurate
bands
of different
example,
bands
[19]. The
conversion possible
with
data
bands
examples
unambiguous
nucleus,
for
of the same
between
spin in these
multipolarity.
to resolve Such
Internal
ambiguities
EO transitions
[20] for transitions
above
and
precise in well
many
between
others
determination these the
can be done
in are
differ-
require of
is
errors
well to a certain
satisfied
if one of the two possible
rejected.
This is because
an de-
obtained
2, the of
3 contains
the
in the facility.
solutions
the
the host on the
in that the beam
access
of the refrigerator.
up to eight
detectors
to
This
to view
of the heat shields
the
enables
four at 45O, to view the target
with
field direc-
the axis of symmetry,
dual-plane
in fig.
lies in the
a modified
ion source by
the cold beam cryostat.
the activity
is implanted
the 3He-4He
a 90”
is focused
refrigerator
Fe)
dilution
magnet
(SM).
The
(typically
tube (CBT) is soldered refrigerator at about
magnetic
are polarized
pro-
on a target
bending (see
research (TM)
The ionized
in
reac-
at 50 kV)
magnet.
section
The
2.2)
before
which is part of the
The ferromagnetic
the temperature
open.
(IS).
are then accelerated beam
(usually
heavy-ion accelerator
beam which is focused
mass-separated
chosen-mass
Holifield
25 MV tandem
FEBIAD
tion products
view of the UNISOR/NOF
2. The
vides the primary
baffle
is that onto
plane.
(HHIRF)
maintain
systems
implanted
the bottom
four
The common
The UNISOR/NOF,
in design
allows
of the
systems.
on-line
the construction
A schematic
entering
comparison
foil (T) on which
to the cold finger of (DR)
which
should
12 mK with the 4 K
domains
in the target
foils
by a 1.5 T superconducting
degree, for
function
2. I. The ‘He- 4He dilution refrigerator
are
of S can only be
S is a quadratic
In section
mixing
measurements systematic
in the determination
these design
the operation
Section
is directly
tion, which determines
and
of neutron-deficient
in the same core.
how
This
but the certainty
the same
Existing
in some cases, by connect-
EO + Ml
precision by
eliminated.
states
unable
and
The
termined
where one
the sign of 6 changes
admixtures.
signatures
ently shaped
ratios.
are
multipole
considered The
within
are characterized,
transitions
instance
measurements.
in the case
[18] where
two bands ing
ratio
shape
can be seen
Au isotopes these
mixing
radia-
is the main
the same solid angle. The external
equatorial
between
[17].
is another
to nearly
to 99% Ml
underlie
orientation
of these
the eight detectors, essentially
facility
change
that
a side access.
Also,
of multipole (c)
three
is from
is shown
ratios
fact
a schematic
nuclear
ion beam
N = 88 and N = 90, where both the sign and magnitude mixing
of
setup
1 shows
fully on-line
the host
nuclear
characteris-
with
This
recently
other hand, differs
For example,
rotor
values
one corresponding
are discussed. results
separated
of informa-
with a level structure
vibrator
in terms
the
the UNISOR/NOF.
2. Experimental
feature
element.
us about
of nuclei.
the
and the other
principles
configuration
on the shape
from nuclei
described
behind
design
UNISOR/NOF
multi-
and shell closures.
especially
by
[Zl],
so
the mixing
The sign of S is also a good source
transition
extra
the arguments
transition
value.
by studying
can
ratios,
ref.
this
using
at this angle will help to distinguish
foil through model
2 of
unambiguously.
preliminary
of mixing ratios with the predictions
single-shell
collectivity
measurement two cases
of nuclei.
the
fig.
at an indefor
sensitive
a transition
of
In
mixing
mo-
have
and magnetic
whereas
be learned
(a) Comparison
tic
the
nuclear
matrix-element
are preserved,
Several
orien-
ratios
than a reduced
contains
6(E2/Ml)
basic
a more
or B(M1)
[21].
be clarified
need
tion, give the same W(90 “)/W(O o ) ratio but differ by 20% in their 45 o angular distribution. Thus only a
electric
below.
be
further
measurements
as 45 O. The
and
mixing
may
as a B(E2)
a S-value
the relative
of
6,
in
such
99% pure E2 radiation
the transition
E2/Ml
can
Krane
[14] and [15],
tests of different
ratio,
such
pole operators
ratios
of
angle
and this requires
angle,
the measurenuclear
in refs.
explained
in many instances
probability,
emitted
to use A,, pendent
transi-
on the other hand, deserves
very sensitive
The
moments
for the reasons
measurements
provided
on
to measure
unambiguously,
cial attention
importantly,
study
be found
yield
of ground states
by low-temperature
need
directional distribution coefficients, A,. In order to eliminate one of the two solutions, it is often necessary
magnetic
all radiatioins
dipole
can
The
values,
moments
radioactive
tation
possible.
and conversion-electron
6 is of the
The refrigerator
and the bottom
bly (fig. 3) were manufactured [22]. The refrigerator to allow bottom
is a standard
access,
access
by Oxford design,
the tail section
beam
assem-
Instruments but, in order
and the magnet
1. C. Gwit / UNISOR
O~-L~~E
NO 1 3 -
OF
0 90 TO
0 90
2 4 2 -
MAGNETIC
T
9 cm
FIELD
& DIRECTION
1.5 T horizontal FIRST 1981
ON-LINE
November
Fig. 1, A schematic
1.5 T horizontal
IMPLANTATION
1983 comparison
have been modified. The tails are cylindrical; the outer one is 18 cm in diameter, so the closest source-to-detector distance is 9 cm. At this distance, for detectors with 5 cm crystal diameter, the magnet allows 1.65, 1.29 and 1.07% solid angle for 0 O, 45” and 90” detectors, respectively. There is also a 2.2 cm opening at the bottom of the magnet for beam entrance. The refrigerator is
UNISOR
0 45 90
DISTANCE
7 cm MAX.
November
-
DETECTOR
cm
0.5, 1.5 vertical
UNlSORfNOF
DETECTORS 2 2
SOURCE 5,6
SYSTEMS
DARESBURY /NICOLE
LEUVEN
425
nuclear orrentation facility
OLNO
/
July
1988
June
1988
of fully on-line systems.
equipped with a “top load” facility to change target material while the refrigerator is operational. The cooling power of the refrigerator at a circulation rate of 500 pmol/s is given by the power relation Q = 0.017(T2 44.9) pW, where T is the target base temperature. The target foils and thermometer sources are soldered on the face of a 1.0 cm diameter cylindrical copper
FACILITY
MS
Hor$on;tai
Vertical PIZIW
Fig. 2. An overall view of the UNISOR/NOF experimental setup. TM: HHIRF 25 MV tandem, IS: modified FEBIAD ion source, MS: mass separator 90 o bending magnet, ED: 90’ electrostatic deflector, QL: quadrupole triplet lens, CBT: cold beam tube, SM: superconducting pofarizing magnet, T: ferromagnetic target foil, DR: dilution refrigerator. III. NUCLEAR
PHYSICS/ASTROPHYSICS
I. C. Grit / UNISOR
426
nuclear orientation facility
it to the entrance of the 90 o electrostatic deflector. The transmission through the horizontal beam line is checked by a removable
Faraday
cup. An x-y
also be used to monitor up.
A 90°
equally
electrostatic
spaced
quadrupole
deflector
parallel
triplet
plates
lens just
vides the final focusing
before
control
deflectors
Faraday
the beam enters
target
ranges
striking
at this stage
cup mounted
The transmission
seven
beam.
the deflector
placed just before
of the beam
of
the
A pro-
the cold
of the beam is achieved
the size of the beam
intensity
can
it is bent
consisting deflects
beyond
beam line. The final steering a set of x-y
beam scanner
the beam shape before
by
an iris used to the target.
The
is monitored
by a
on the 4 K baffle. from the dispersion
chamber
from 70% to 96% for different
to the
beams.
2.3. Data acquisition system Currently
the UNISOR/NOF
tem is based linked
on a Tennecomp
to a Concurrent
CAMAC
interface.
transferred either
THE BOTTOM ACCESS
in the isotope holder
ber
which
of the dilution
is screwed unit
into the mixing
by the top
loading
sample
holder
is made of high-purity
lurium
copper
and lies at the center
holtz-type
superconducting
run in persistent and
the beam
refrigerator
magnet
cryostat
detection liquid
transfer
Recent baffles
which
surrounds
are closed,
can
also
be
field.
The
are accommod-
A separate
experimentalists
experiments
tel-
is horizontal,
to this
and the detectors
electronics,
platform and
for
cryogenic
shown
that,
a base temperature
when
all the
of 7.6 mK can be
reached.
first,
monitor
of
the
beam
A compressor
line narrows
is focused
separator
and a Faraday
sity of the beam line.
is controlled
by several lenses and deflector
the separated
before
in
which
cup check it enters
and
assemblies.
At
in the dispersion a beam
the shape
profile
and inten-
the horizontal
lens at the beginning
the beam;
accesses
the anisotropy
of interest.
of spec-
Thus,
to be
the data on the of the refrigera-
of up to three peaks the experimenters
of the sample
In on-line ber of counts
nuclear
orientation
observed
can
in real time.
beam
of the beam
an einzel lens at the end focuses
experiments
by a detector
the num-
at a given angle
0
is given by N( 0, T) = &&W(@, where
N,
T)&(7),
is the beam
rate
of the intrinsic
angle
0, the solid
angle
0, branching
angle
of the detector
at
by the detector
at
factors
counting
time at temperature
decay
etc.;
W(0,
is the
T) refers
to the
of a y-ray
T as defined
and
T,(T)
at an angle
in ref. [23].
orientation
experiments
where the
of the isotope
of interest
is constant,
and since
orientation
temperature
experiments, due
current
T;
function
coefficients,
(T = 1 K),
NT& can be determined tion
in the decay
dewars
nuclear
the nuclear high
involved
through
distribution
T, je is a
efficiency
attenuation
In off-line
(I) at temperature
subtended
radiation
0 and host temperature The 50 kV beam from the separator
chamber
and length
2.4. Data analysis
directional
2.2. The beam line
monitored
stored tapes.
allows the collection
the base temperature
the alignment
function
the inner one. have
are
of a 1.5 T Helm-
is vertical
ated by a 6 m high platform.
monitor
they
and the type of data storage program
a be
rod. The
oxygen-free
mode. The field direction direction
cham-
through
automatically
where
the number
A separate
disk and monitors
sys-
which is
computer can
of both computers
tra to be transferred controlled.
acquisition
disk drives or magnetic
time of the acquisition,
tor, and calculates sample
spectra
mainframe
on high-capacity
The software
Fig. 3. The bottom beam access to a ‘H~G~H~ refrigerator: (1) mixing chamber, (2) target, (3) superconducting magnet (1.5 T), (4) room temperature shield, (5) 77 K shield, (6) 4 K shield, (7) iris, (8) iris controller.
mainframe
The
to the
data
TP 5000 system
go to zero at
at high temperature.
the variations
to the fluctuations or changes
B,,
the normalization
factor
In on-line
in the rate of ion implantain the
in the extraction
accelerator
beam
efficiency
of the
I. C. Gird / UNISOR
isotope
separator
“warm”
(T-
this case,
will cause
1 K)
the normalization
the ratio
N( 0, T)/N(
R = B”(e,
will no longer
data.
cancel
The nuclide symmetry
(2)
on-line
[24] was chosen
experiment
spectrum The
c)N,/N,,
(3)
HHIRF
the ratio:
R,=R/R,,
(4)
eliminated.
unknown
Then,
A(B)
= l-
NJN,,,
at an angle
T)/W(O,
is
0 can be
in the following
(5) to choose
the ratio
of
way:
where
[NC@,c>/t(e> c>l [N(O, c>/f(O,c>l [N(Q, w>,‘t(e, w)] [N(O>w)/‘t(O, w)] ’ (6) 0 refers to six possible
45 o or 90 o positions
0 means 0 ’ or 180 O. Due to differences each
detector,
rately.
live times
The errors
tainties
correction system
to directly
and
B,U,A,) distribution
detectors,
with movement ak calculated
on a natural
The
data
were
K and was deposited
controlling
this temperature, were
from
for movement
in
of
and
A,
U,
for
to directional respectively.
effects
associated
For example,
A(45 o ) and A(90 o ) with A(270 o ), we correct
the line connecting
In the six-detector to obtain tectors
ak from
(0”
system eight
or 180a;
the 90°
and
these
eight
times,
so in the final
values, final known
combinations,
from A,,
each
information then
source would
of de-
45O or 225’).
detector average
is increased
if the orientation
the main
combinations
or 270”;
statistical
the uncertainty analysis,
now in use, it is possible
different
90°
in eight
at the
cycles.
Beam
h in each cycle.
the beam
access
from
buildup
was closed At
for two hours.
six detectors
placed
at 0 O,
runs, each of
At the end of each cycle,
the sample
by a new iron foil in order to avoid the
of daughter
end of this period
activity.
The activity
was collected taken.
At the
the beam was shut off by a gate valve
and the target was allowed The
1
Then
down to base temperature.
cold data were collected
acquired
the
ion/s
was about
on the target while warm data were being
102 transitions
to cool for about
observed
30-40
min.
in 19’Au are currently
under analysis.
4. Conclusion The
ur( =
from pairs of diamet-
A(45 o ) and
along
values
are reduced.
from
was 2 X lo5
- l/2
the
The advantage
radiation,
results
for
from
Throughout
when the target
and the target was cooled Data
W target.
collected
on the target
= 51 min)
C beam
uncer-
270 o detectors.
cients.
target.
a 110 MeV
(Tl,2
accu-
introduced
coefficients,
systematic
of the beam
uk calculated
the
where
for gamma
by averaging
opposite
averaging
obtain
and deorientation
Furthermore,
classification by radioactive
isomer
the beam intensity
was allowed
is that, from any pair of A(90”),
u4( = BJJ,A,),
k = 2 and 4 refer,
quite
statistical
uncertainties
and peak fitting.
it is possible
cients,
experiment
and
of dead time of
be known
on N(t7, T) include
of the present
rically
should
as well as additional
background
state,
tandem
10 min duration.
_
state
a O(6)
its low-lying
this
of 19’Au, studied
by using
foil was replaced 1
by
45 O, 90 O, 180 O, 225 o and 270 o in 12-14
A(e)
=
whether
described
states
the gate valve
T).
it is convenient
this function
ratio
to 0 ‘, as shown below:
W(t9,
Experimentally
beam-rate
the anisotropies
given with respect
with
for the first UNISOR/NOF
r91Hg high-spin
of the
Instead,
the
be
excited
decay
where c and w refer to cold and warm data respectively.
that
nuclei
to determine
could
were produced
so
of even-even
scheme.
to:
we define
t9’Au, which has a Z = 3/2 ground
and lies in a region
’
Nwje
=
3. The on-line nuclear orientation of 19’Hg
In
from
NcfeW0, c>
w)/te(w)
which will reduce
in NT between
(T < 20 mK)
0, T -+ co). So we will have
NC@, c)/b(c>
R= N(B,
variations
and “cold”
421
nuclear orientation facility
is used of the eight
by fi
In four nk
= 2. In the
coefficients,
B,,
based
on the parent
ground
on distribution
coeffi-
of
tion refrigerators angles around ments as
the beam
The option
the target,
count
rate
in distance
bottom
90°
due
between
feature number
of detectors
available.
to achieve
this extra
means affect they affect
the performance
detectors,
multiple
mixing
will enhance
but ratios
with
technical
changes
did not by any
of an NMR
nor will
system
and
determination
of
a high degree
our understanding
and the
etc. This due to the
of the refigerator,
unambiguous
such
movement,
holder
feature
mo-
errors,
due to contractions, the counting statistics
the incorporation
particle
transition
beam
The
at 45 o
of the system,
the to
orienta-
the system
detectors
the sample
detector also enhances
necessary
enters
feature
uniquely
successfully
nuclear
some of the systematic
fluctuations
changes
now
of placing
a unique
us to determine and reduces
has
for on-line
whereby
from the bottom. enables
system
a new design
of nuclear
of accuracy structure.
are
of error
be due to those
UNISOR/NOF
demonstrated
U, coeffi-
The work at Vanderbilt supported Contract 760R00033,
by nos.
the
US
University
Department
DE-AS05-76ER05034
respectively.
UNISOR
III. NUCLEAR
and UNISOR of
Energy and
is
under
DE-ACOS-
is a consortium
PHYSICS/ASTROPHYSICS
of
428
I. C. Girit / UNISOR
universities, State of Tennessee, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and is partially supported by them and by the US Department of Energy. The Joint Institute for Heavy Ion Research has as member institutions the University of Tennessee, Vanderbilt University, and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory; it is supported by the members and by the Department of Energy through Contract no. DE-FGOS87ER40361 with the University of Tennessee.
nuclear orientation facdity [7] J. Wouters, [8] L.
Vanneste,
[lo]
P.J. Back,
[ll]
W.D.
[12]
H. Marshak,
D. Vandeplassche, Nuytten
L. Vanneste,
and E. van Walle,
Instr.
J. Geenen, and Meth.
C. 186
Hamilton,
Hyperfine
Interactions
10
Green,
Hyperfine
S.J. Robinson, Interactions
[31 K. Schlosser, Workshop, tember
Conf. St.
N.J.
15/16 Proc.
Edmunds
Stone
(1983)
On-Line Hall,
4, 1988, to be published
Oxford,
Orientation-l
August
in Hyperfine
Interactions.
Hamilton
E.F. Zganjar,
[20]
E.F.
E. van Walle,
J. Wouters,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986)
N. Severijns 2641.
[23]
M.O.
Stability,
Phys.
Interactions
Int.
Conf. Rosseau
Proc. (1988)
Wood,
1567. 4th Den-
p. 630.
Kortelahti,
5th
(1979)
Helsingor,
D. Vandeplassche,
Hyperfine
N. Severijns
22 (1985)
J.L.
Wood
on
Nuclei
507.
and Far
Lake, Ontario,
CD. From
Canada
p. 313.
ref. [3].
Instruments
K.S. Krane,
[24] J.L.
97.
and M.A. Grimm,
Ltd., Osney Mead, Oxford
England.
p. 731.
Inter-
Rev. Mod.
J. Phys. Gil
81-09)
ed. I.S. Towner,
Krane,
[22] Oxford
Hamilton,
Far From
J. Wouters,
Papanicolopulos,
[21] KS.
Hyperfine
22 (1985)
Cole, J.L. Wood
1981 (CERN
Zganjar,
Stability,
and J.H.
on Nuclei
1987, AIP Conf.
Nuclear Orientation, eds. H. 151 P. Herzog, Low Temperature Postma and N.J. Stone (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986)
Interactions
and K. Kumar, J.D.
and L. Vanneste,
421.
[61 D. Vandeplassche. and L. Vanneste,
Hyperfine
[19] E. van Walle,
31-Sep-
K. Frei-
1764;
119.
mark, June
979. Nuclear
E. Klein,
59 (1987)
ref. [5] p. 199.
Int. Conf.
and P.M. Walker,
W. Vander-
ref. [3].
P. Roman,
and N. Mutsoro,
K. Kumar
(171 W.D.
W.
1583.
193.
ref. [5] p. 527.
A. KIuge, M. Reu141 P. Herzog, H.R. Folle, K. Freitag, schenbach and E. Bodenstadt, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 155 (1978)
1. Berkes,
Chaplin,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
[16] J. Lange,
[18]
1219;
and
33 (1988)
J. Vanhaverbeke,
Brewer,
K. Nishimura 39 (1988)
54 (1982)
N.J. Stone and W.D.
Vanhaverbeke
ref. (81 p. 1583.
and D.H.
W.D.
[15] E. Hagn,
211.
(1981) V.R.
H. Pattyn,
Nucl.
J.
N. Severijns 1901.
ref. [3].
Hutchison
tag and P. Herzog,
[14]
PI
N. Severijns,
[13] B.G. Turrel,
References
Severijns,
56 (1986)
Bull. Am. Phys. Sot.
and J. Wouters,
S. Ohya,
(1981)
N.
[9] L. Vanneste, poorten
E. van Walle,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Vanderpoorten,
actions
PI
D. Vandeplassche,
and L. Vanneste,
ref. [5] p. 31. Phys. Rev. C24 (1981)
1788.
OX2 ODX,