The use of a soft denture liner for chronic residual ridge soreness

The use of a soft denture liner for chronic residual ridge soreness

BRI EF REPORTS The use of a soft denture liner for chronic residual ridge soreness J. David Duncan, DDS, M SD Lawrence L. Clark, DDS, M S r hronic...

477KB Sizes 3 Downloads 58 Views

BRI EF

REPORTS

The use of a soft denture liner for chronic residual ridge soreness J. David Duncan, DDS, M SD Lawrence L. Clark, DDS, M S

r

hronic resid u al ridge soreness in com plete denture patients can be one of the m ost vexing problem s a dentist en­ counters. The difficulty exists not only in determ ining the cause of the problem, but also in deciding on the proper course of treatm en t. W h eth er th e problem is a faulty prosthesis or sim ply the incompatability of the hard denture base press­ ing delicate tissue against the residual ridge m ust be determ ined by the clini­ cian.

D iagnosis

soreness occasionally persists after im prove­ m ent of diet and oral hygiene, and the elim ina­ tion of technical errors in the dentures. One of the m ost comm on causes of this sore­ ness is senile atrophy of the tissues covering th e re s id u a l rid g e . As th e p a tie n t ages, catabolism predom inates anabolism resulting in the reduction of the num ber of cell layers in the mucosa, as w ell as a reduction in th e total denture-bearing area. The normal m asticatory force com presses the sensory nerve endings in a th in m ucosa betw een the hard denture base and the often sharp residual ridge. In th is par­ ticular situation, a soft resilient liner betw een the hard acrylic resin base and underlying structures can prevent m uch of the nerve com­ pression and resultant pain.

A differential diagnosis m ust be made to de­ term ine w hether the problem is caused by one D iscussion or more of the following reasons: reaction of the soft tissues to the base m aterial or excessive m onom er retained w ithin the base; im proper Soft liners have been used on a routine occlusal relationships (vertical, centric, or ex­ basis as w ell as for special problems in­ cursive); poor fit of the denture base; bacterial volving chronic ridge soreness, bilater­ o r f u n g a l i n f e c t i o n ; p r e s s u r e o n th e ally undercut residual ridges, and pros­ nasopalatine nerve or pressure on the m an­ thetic obturators. The basic requirem ents d ibular canal; physiologic changes associated for a soft liner include: insolubility in the w ith clim ateric changes; senile atrophy, pro­ m outh; adhesion to and no serious effect ducing a lack of thickness in the lam ina pro­ on the denture base; m aintenance of soft­ pria covering the denture-bearing area, w hich often contains num erous sharp, bony spicules; ness and resiliency; low w ater absorp­ bruxism ; excessive den tu re wear; or other tion; sm all dim ensional change during problem s, such as debilitating diseases, neo­ processing; ease of cleaning w ith good plasm , or poor nutrition. abrasion resistance; color stability; and A proper m edical and dental history, ra­ satisfactory tissue tolerance. diographic evaluation, and clinical exam ina­ Generally, resin resilient liners are rela­ tion are invaluable in diagnosing the problem tively hard and have a short life. Various and determ ining a proper course of treatm ent.

other soft lining m aterials have been used in the past, but none has m et all the re­ Treatment quirem ents for a perm anent soft liner. For this reason, the American Dental Associa­ A lteration of the denture occlusion or dental tion Council on Dental Materials, Instru­ base, im proving the oral hygiene or diet, surgi­ m ents, an d E quipm ent has classified cal alteration of the residual ridge, or rem aking the denture using sound fundam ental prosth- th e se m a te ria ls as “ tem p o ra ry e x p e ­ odontic principles can be excellent modes of dients.” 1 However, favorable results have been treatm ent that w ill usually im prove or resolve the problem. However, chronic residual ridge reported w ith the use of type A medical64 ■ JADA, V ol. I l l , Ju ly 1985

grade silicone adhesives (RTV silicones) and heat-processed silicone rubber.2,3 Certain type A, m edical grade silicone a d h e s i v e s ( P r o la s tic ) a n d a h e a tprocessed silicone rubber liner (Molloplast B) have retained resiliency indefi­ nitely. In addition, these materials have bonded w ell to the hard denture base resin, have been com patible w ith the oral tissues, and are relatively stain resistant, tasteless, odorless, and color stable. A n e w h e a t-p ro c e s se d p la s tic iz e d m ethacrylate resin material (Softie 49) has prom ise as a long-lasting resilient liner because of its softness, longevity, and resistance to fungal growth. How­ ever, this m aterial is new and does not have the proved clinical longevity of the other materials. Several authors have reported positive responses from patients who used resi­ lient liners to relieve discomfort caused by long-time denture wear.2'6Makila5 de­ scribed 18 patients who had chronic tis­ sue soreness beneath a denture that could not be relieved by bringing the denture into a functionally faultless occlusion. He fo u n d th at 71% of these p atien ts re­ m ained symptom-free after 3 years w hen a soft liner m aterial was used. Some relief was reported by all of the patients. The most common problems encoun­ tered in the use of resilient liners include: an attem pt to use the material as a cure for fundam ental technical errors; abuse of the liners from poor oral hygiene habits; im proper use of denture cleaners; diffi­ culty in processing the resilient material; difficulty in adjusting the cured resilient material; and the tendency in some oral environm ents for the material to harbor yeasts (Candida albicans).7 For the resilient liner to rem ain effec­

BRI EF

tive over a long period, the patient m ust be instructed in proper care of the pros­ thesis. Silicone liners are som ew hat por­ ous and the fungal grow th that m ay occur internally can be detrim ental to the liner if proper care is not taken. M ost com m er­ cial cleaning solutions are either ineffec­ tive or detrim ental to resilient liners, p ar­ ticularly the hypochlorite (bleach) solu­ tions that cause rapid deterioration of the re silie n t lin e r and m u st n o t be u se d routinely.7 A bacteriostatic cleaning solutio n c o n ta in in g b u ffe re d b e n z y lam m onium chloride (Prolastic Denture Cleaner) or buffered solutions of benzalkonium chloride (Zephiran) in concentra­ tions of 1 oz of 1:750 concentration per quart of water, have been show n effective in retarding fungal grow th.8 Brushing the soft liner w ith a soft brush and baking soda before soaking has also been re ­ ported to be an effective cleaning adjunct to daily soaking in bacteriostatic solu­ tions.2

Sum m ary Chronic residual ridge soreness in pa­

tien ts w ith com plete d entures can be caused by various factors. A differential diagnosis betw een physiologic or ana­ tomic problems (or both) and functional deficiencies in the p atien t’s present den­ tures m ust be m ade. The functional de­ ficiencies can often be elim inated easily, w hereas physiologic and anatom ic prob­ lems may be more difficult to correct, es­ pecially in the geriatric patient. If the functional deficiencies in the pa­ tie n t’s dentures have been corrected and surgical procedures are not a viable alter­ native, placem ent of a long-term resilient liner can often resolve the chronic re­ sidual ridge soreness that is present in d en tu re patients. Properly placed and properly cared for silicone or silicone rubber resilient denture liners can pro­ vide comfort for over 70% of patients with chronic residual ridge soreness for 3 to 5 years and often longer.

T h e a u th o rs h av e n o re la tio n s h ip to a n y of the m a n u fa c tu re rs a n d are n o t a w are o f a n y fin a n c ia l or o th e r in te re s ts in th is m a n u sc rip t.

REPORTS

Dr. D u n c an is a sso c iate p ro fesso r, re s to ra tiv e d e n ­ tistry , an d Dr. C lark is d ire c to r, g e n eral p ra c tic e re s i­ d e n c y , a n d a sso c iate p ro fesso r, re sto ra tiv e d e n tis try , U n iv e rsity o f M iss is sip p i S ch o o l of D e n tistry , d e ­ p a rtm e n t of re s to ra tiv e d e n tistry , 2500 N S tate St, Jackson, M S 39216. A d d re ss re q u e sts for re p rin ts to Dr. D un can .

1. C o u n cil o n D en tal M aterials, In s tru m e n ts , a n d E q u ip m en t. D e n tists ’ D esk R eference: M ate rials, In ­ stru m e n ts , a n d E q u ip m en t, ed 2. C hicago, A m e ric a n D ental A sso c ia tio n , 1983, p 174. 2. S e g a ll, B .W ., a n d G la s s m a n , A . U s e o f a m e d ic al-g ra d e s ilic o n e a d h e s iv e as a d e n tu re lin e r in th e tre a tm e n t of id io p a th ic o ra l m u c o sa l irrita tio n . J P ro sth e t D ent 4 7 (l):8 5 -8 7 , 1982. 3. S c h m id t, W .F ., a n d S m ith , W.E. A six -y e a r re tro sp e c tiv e s tu d y of M o llo p la st-B -lin e d d e n tu re s. L in er serv ice a b ility . J P ro sth e t D ent 5 0 :459-465,1983. 4. W oelfol, J., a n d P affenbarger, G. E v a lu a tio n o f c o m p le te d e n tu re s lin e d w ith re s ilie n t s ilic o n e ru b ­ ber. JADA 76(3):582-590, 1968. 5. M akila, E. Soft lin in g to re lie v e so re n ess b e n ea th d e n tu re s. J O ral R eh ab il 3:145-201, 1976. 6. L aney, W.R. P ro ce sse d re s ilie n t d e n tu re lin ers. D ent C lin N o rth A m 14:531-551, 1970. 7. M ak ila, E., a n d H o p su -H a v a , V.K. M y c o tic g ro w th a n d soft d e n tu re lin in g m ate ria ls. A cta O donto l S c a n d 35 :1 9 7 -2 0 5 ,1 9 7 7 . 8. M asella, R.P.; D olan, C.T.; a n d L aney, W .R. T he p re v e n tio n o f th e g ro w th of C an d id a o n S ila stic 390 soft lin e r fo r d e n tu re s. J P ro sth e t D ent 33:250-251, 1975.

Acceptance of hepatitis B vaccine by Rhode Island dental practitioners Joseph A. Yacovone, DMD, M PH Jason W eisfeld, M D, M PH

H

epatitis B is a severe infectious dis­ ease that can have serious long-term con­ sequences for health professionals.1 Cir­ rhosis and prim ary hepatocellular car­ cinoma are serious sequelae of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Dentists and para­ dental personnel are at high risk of HBV infection because they are in frequent contact via direct percutaneous inocula­ tion of infective serum or plasm a by nee­ dle or transfusion of infective blood or blood products; indirect percutaneous in ­ troduction of infective serum or plasm a, such as through m inute skin cuts or abra­ sions; absorption of infective serum or

plasm a through m ucosal surfaces, such as the m outh or eye; absorption of other po­ te n tia lly in fective secretio n s su ch as saliv a th ro u g h m ucosal contact; and transfer of infective serum or plasm a via in an im ate en v ironm ental surfaces or, possibly, vectors. The fact that as many as 10% of HBV in­ fections result in chronic carriage of Hep­ atitis B Surface Antigens (HBsAg) is im ­ portant in the continuing transm ission of h ep atitis B.2 A bout three persons per 1,000 of the general population are car­ riers, but several groups have a m uch higher carrier rate. These include patients

receiv in g h em o d ialy sis (7%); in s titu ­ tionalized m entally handicapped persons (7% to 35%); p a tie n ts w ith im m unosuppressed disorders, recipients of m ul­ tiple blood transfusions, and drug abus­ ers using percutaneous routes (5%); and m ale ho m o sex u als (6% ).3 Im m igrants from endem ic areas show that up to 15% of the population are HBV-carriers. Of all health care personnel, dentists, oral surgeons, and dental hygienists are at perhaps the highest risk of HBV infec­ tion.4 About 13% of practicing general dentists, com pared w ith 4% of the general population, acquire HBV infections. The

Yaco vone-W eisfeld: ACCEPTANCE O F H E P A T IT IS B V A CCIN E ■ 65