Chemosphere, Voi.24, No.10, pp 1505-1522, 1992 Printed in Great Britain
THE USE OF THE TERRESTRIAL AMPHIPODA;
AMPHIPOD
0045-6535/92 $5.00 + 0.00 Pergamon Press Ltd.
ARCITALITRUS
TALITRIDAE)
AS A POTENTIAL
COPPER
AVAILABILITIES
Jason
M.
DORRIENI
BIOMONITOR IN
(CRUBTACEA~
OFAMBXENTZINCKND
LEAF-LITTER
Weeks I
School of Biological Sciences Queen Mary & W e s t f i e l d College University of London Mile End Road London, E1 4NS U.K. iInstitute of Biology, Odense University, Campusvej-55, DK-5230 Odense M Denmark
ABSTRACT
The mode of metal accumulation
employed by the t e r r e s t r i a l t a l i t r i d
amphipod A r c i t a l i t r u s dorrieni (Hunt) feeding on leaf litter v a r i o u s ly e n r i c h e d
w i t h the e s s e n t i a l
established
in the laboratory.
metals
and zinc h a v e b e e n
Body c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
were found to increase over time dietary metal concentrations.
copper
of b o t h m e t a l s
c o r r e l a t i n g w i t h the i n c r e a s i n g
Field trials to assess the p o t e n t i a l
use of this a m p h i p o d as a terrestrial b i o m o n i t o r for a m b i e n t copper and zinc availabilities
in leaf litter are described.
The results
indicate a potential b i o m o n i t o r i n g c a p a c i t y for zinc (and p o s s i b l y for copper also).
The presently
restricted
distribution
of this
species, however, limits its b i o m o n i t o r i n g p o t e n t i a l to m e t a l l i f e r o u s areas of S.W. England, but reflects u n k n o w n p o t e n t i a l in its native Australia. INTRODUCTION The use of aquatic organisms to m o n i t o r trace metal b i o a v a i l a b i l i t i e s 1505
1506
is well established centrations
(see Phillips, 1980 for review); the metal con-
in bodies of net a c c u m u l a t o r s
function of the amounts of bioavailable
b e i n g by d e f i n i t i o n
metal
in the environment
integrated over time. Prerequisite characteristics have been listed by Bryan e_~t al.
a
of biomonitors
(1980, 1985) and Phillips
(1980).
The recent use of littoral talitrid amphipod crustaceans as convenient biomonitors for the essential metals copper and zinc (Rainbow et al~, 1989; Moore e_~tal., 1991) has already highlighted several areas of copper and zinc enrichment in coastal locations conventionally regarded as being uncontaminated. The similar use of isopod crustaceans as
indicators of anthropogen-
ic or natural "hotspots" of metal pollution in terrestrial habitats is similarly well documented (Wieser e_ttal., 1976; Coughtrey et al., 1977; Martin & Coughtrey, 1982; Hopkin e t al., 1986). To the author's knowledge no attempt has been made to use t e r r e s t r i a l (landhoppers)
amphipods
in similar circumstances. The introduced terrestrial
talitrid Ar~italitrus dorrieni has been recorded now from more than 90 localities in Britain and Ireland (Harding & Sutton, 1988), mostly in the west and south of Cornwall and along the southern coast of Devon and Dorset. The metals copper and zinc are Grey List s u b s t a n c e s
within the
definition of the Paris Convention and European Community "Dangerous Substances" Directive. Although both these metals may become toxic in excess, they are essential trace elements required, for example, for the metabolic functioning of proteins
(e.g. Cu for the respiratory
pigment haemocyanin and Zn for the enzyme carbonic anhydrase). This study therefore investigates the suitability of Arcitalit~us dorrieni as a biomonitor for copper and zinc. Laboratory studies were designed to verify that this talitrid is a net accumulator of metals assimilated from food (cf. supralittoral talitrids,
Weeks,
1990; Weeks &
1507
Rainbow, 1990, W e e k s & Rainbow, 1991). Moreover, to assess the relative p o t e n t i a l
and m e r i t s of u s i n g A_~. d o r r i e n i as a b i o m o n i t o r ,
a
c o m p a r a t i v e field study was u n d e r t a k e n of c o p p e r and zinc c o n c e n t r a tions
in A__~.d o r r i e n i c o l l e c t e d from six l o c a l i t i e s
MATERIALS
Accumulation
Groups
and zinc
of i0 A r c i t a l i t r u s
Plymouth, ments
of c o p p e r
Devon,
U.K.
No d i s c r i m i n a t i o n acid-washed
Petri
AND METHODS
from a l d e r
dorrieni
(see T a b l e
such that each group between dishes
filter paper moistened
dishes
polythene
was
"leaf s h a p e s "
regime of 16hL:
i),
were
(suitably
humidified
by
for
experi-
of s i m i l a r
Amphipods
were
with
size.
held
in
a strip
of
water held by capil-
Survivorship
improved
the
cut f r o m a c i d - w a s h e d
Animals
from B u d s h e a d Wood,
amphipods
sexes was made.
(Alnus ulutinosa)
selected
in d o u b l e - d i s t i l l e d
markedly
a n i m a l s c o u l d nestle.
leaves
collected
contained
larity to the inside of the lid). Petri
in the U.K..
of A. d o r r i e n i
provision
of
in
black
sheets under which
w e r e h e l d at 15"C w i t h a l i g h t i n g
8hD.
TABLE i. D e t a i l s of the c o l l e c t i o n s of ~ ~ sites in SW England, SE E n g l a n d and the Island of C o l o n s a y Hebrides), Scotland.
from (Inner
Collection details
Site
Date
T r e l i s s i c k Gardens, C o r n w a l l Carbis bay, C o r n w a l l St Euny, Redruth, C o r n w a l l B u d s h e a d wood, Plymouth, D e v o n Kew Royal B o t a n i c gdns, L o n d o n Colonsay, S c o t l a n d
1/7/89 2/9/89 2/9/89 2/9/89
22/2/89 24/1/88
O.S. grid reference SW SW SW SX SU NR
839395 528390 692414 426599 188774 396972
Each g r o u p of a m p h i p o d s was a l l o w e d to feed for 21 days
on discs
1508
of a l d e r leaf
(Alnus glutinosa)
using a stainless distilled
steel
water)
concentrations. had r e s u l t e d
(cut so as to a v o i d the mid-rib,
cork-borer previously
containing
The metal
one
concentrations
from 24h e x p o s u r e
tilled water,
of a n u m b e r
at 1 5 ° C
rinsed
in d o u b l e -
of c o p p e r
in the
or
zinc
a l d e r leaf discs
in 50 cm 3 of d o u b l e - d i s -
either w i t h o u t a d d i t i o n of metal
(control exposure)
or w i t h one of a logarithmic series of d i s s o l v e d metal c o n c e n t r a tions
(prepared
Analar grade
from a s t a n d a r d
(BDH Ltd)).
concentrations 476,
1372,
2584,
case
of c o p p e r :
33.3
3800 ~g Cu g-i dry wt.
added
chloride
salt,
In the case of zinc the m e a s u r e d
metal
Petri
77.8
(control),
3250 or 4967 ~g Zn g-i dry wt; (control),
112,
248,
556,
1138,
and
106,
in the
1725,
or
A f t e r e x p o s u r e the a l d e r leaf d i s c s were
d r y a n d two w e i g h e d
to the
of the
in the alder leaf discs were:
261,
blotted
solution
dishes.
discs Leaf
for e a c h discs
were
concentration changed
were
every
2-3
days as appropriate. A f t e r 21 days feeding, individual a m p h i p o d s w e r e w a s h e d in d o u b l e d i s t i l l e d water, dried to c o n s t a n t w e i g h t at 60°C, d i g e s t e d in A r i s tar conc. HNO 3 (BDH Ltd., U.K.)
at 100°C and m a d e up to v o l u m e
(2
cm 3) w i t h d o u b l e - d i s t i l l e d water. Digests were s u b s e q u e n t l y a n a l y s e d for total c o p p e r and zinc by flame atomic a b s o r p t i o n s p e c t r o p h o t o m e try (background c o r r e c t i o n for zinc) on an IL-157 a t o m i c a b s o r p t i o n spectrophotometer.
Leaf discs were
s i m i l a r l y dried,
digested
and
a n a l y s e d for total copper and zinc.
Field survey
A r c i t a l i t r u s dorrieni w e r e c o l l e c t e d from the v a r i o u s
s i t e s listed
in T a b l e 1 - e i t h e r individually by hand, or by m a s s c o l l e c t i o n s of leaf litter. A m p h i p o d s w e r e r e t u r n e d to the l a b o r a t o r y a l i v e w i t h i n
1509
b 1000
1000
?= |
|
6 c
o
~jl
100
0 cJ
j~
u ,u
p-
o F10
100
, 10
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
100
Food copper
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
1000
concentration
.
.
.
.
.
r
I
104
10
pg g-1
104
1000
100
F o o d zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n
Pg g - i
Fig. i. M e a n total (a) copper and (b) zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n s (~g g-i ± 1 SD) of Arcitalitrus dorrieni fed for 21 days on a range of v a r i o u s l y enriched dietary litter copper or zinc concentrations. E q u a t i o n s of the r e g r e s s i o n l i n e s f i t t e d b y l e a s t s q u a r e s a r e (a) l o g y = 0.302(logx) + 1.39, R = 0.96 (P<0.01) and (b) log y= 0.247(iog X) + 1.79, R = 0.97 (P<0.01). Line (b) excludes the final data point (see text).
i
~,
- • 12-
20
'o~ 10 -
~
u u
m
o
6
q 0
o 0
1000
2000
3000
F o o d c o p p e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n (~Jg g - l }
4000
0
1000
2000
3000
F o o d zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n (pg 3 -I}
Fig. 2. M e a n rates of (a) copper and (b) zinc net accumulation (~g g-~ ± 1 SD) (measured as the net increase over controls) by A r c i t e l i trus dorrieni, fed on a range of variously enriched litter copper or zinc concentrations (~g g-±) for 21 days. Equations of regression lines fitted by least squares are (a) y= 0.002(x) + 0.520, R=0.92 (P<0.Ol) and (b) y= O.003(x) + 1.99, R=0.95 (P
4000
1510
24h of collection in plastic bags containing some of the substratum on which they were feeding.
It was decided not to allow time for
depuration of the guts of individual amphipods since available data suggest that gut contents are not significant variables in the assessment of body burdens of copper and zinc in this talitrid (Rainbow & Moore, 1986; Moore & Rainbow, 1987; Weeks, 1990). Collections were made in February, July and September,
1989, and additional material
was collected from the Island of Colonsay, Inner Hebrides (courtesy of J. & P. Clarke)
in January,
1988.
Landhoppers were sorted and individually washed in double-distilled water, dried, digested
and made up to volume. Digests were analysed
for total copper and zinc
as described previously. Leaf litter from
each respective site was similarly dried, digested and analysed for total copper and zinc. Logarithmic transformation of the data enabled statistical investigation by parametric techniques
including regression analysis and
analysis of variance (ANOVA) according to Sokal & Rohlf (1981), both Drlori
testing for differences amongst all means, and a Dosteriori
testing for differences between selected groups was undertaken. All metal concentrations
are quoted as ~g g-i on a dry weight basis,
unless otherwise stated.
RESULTS copper accumulation by Arcitalitrus dorrieni Fig.
la shows the mean concentrations
of copper in e x p e r i m e n t a l
amphipods allowed to feed on alder leaf discs previously exposed to a range of elevated copper concentrations. The mean body copper concentration of control amphipods
(85.5 #g g-l; i SD 16.6, no8) did not
differ significantly (P>0.05) from the mean copper concentrations of the initial amphipods
(82.8 ~g g-l; i SD 12.0, no10). Analysis of
1511
these data by ANOVA showed that the amphipods feeding on elevated dietary copper concentrations had mean body copper concentrations significantly raised above that of control amphipods (P<0.01). There was a s i g n i f i c a n t c o r r e l a t i o n
(P<0.01)
b e t w e e n m e a n b o d y copper
concentrations and food copper concentrations at all food concentrations above the control. There was no significant change (P>O.05) in mean body zinc concentration of amphipods with exposure to elevated dietary copper concentration. Thus there is a significant increase in the whole body copper concentration of A_~.dorrieni with increasing exposure to elevated dietary copper concentrations.
zinc accumulation by Arcitalitrus dorrieni Fig.
ib s h o w s the m e a n c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
of zinc
in e x p e r i m e n t a l
amphipods allowed to feed on alder leaf discs previously exposed to a range of zinc concentrations. The mean body zinc concentration of control amphipods differ s i g n i f i c a n t l y
(174 .g g-l;
(P>0.05)
of i n i t i a l a m p h i p o d s
i SD 55.0;
no8)
did not
from the m e a n zinc concentrations
(199 ~g g-l;
1 SD 39.8;
n=10).
A N O V A re-
vealed that the amphipods feeding on e l e v a t e d d i e t a r y zinc concentrations raised
had
above
mean
that
body
zinc
of c o n t r o l
concentrations
amphipods
significantly
(P<0.01).
There
was
a
significant regression (P<0.01) between mean body zinc concentration and d i e t a r y
zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n at all
food c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
above the control. The apparently reduced mean total zinc concentration of amphipods exposed to the highest food zinc concentration is p o s s i b l y due to a r e d u c t i o n the h i g h e r
increase
in food metal
in feeding a s s o c i a t e d w i t h
concentration
(Weeks,
1990).
Consequently, this datum point was omitted from the final regression plot.
There
was
no s i g n i f i c a n t
change
(P>0.05)
in b o d y
1512
copper
concentration
of amphipods
with
exposure
to elevated
zinc
concentrations. Thus there is a significant increase in the whole body zinc concentrations of A. dorrieni with exposure to e l e v a t e d dietary zinc concentrations.
Rates of a c c u m u l a t i o n of copper and zinc from food by A_~. d o r r i e n i
Copper A significant
regression
(P<0.01)
could be p l o t t e d
the mean copper a c c u m u l a t i o n rate by A r c i t a l i t r u s dietary
(Fig.
2a)
for
dorrieni against
copper concentration.
The mean copper a c c u m u l a t i o n rate of A_~.dorrieni, as c a l c u l a t e d from the r e g r e s s i o n line in Fig. 2a, for an a m p h i p o d feeding on alder leaf litter from an u n p o l l u t e d location (7.7 ~g Cu g-l; 1 SD 6.7) is 0.539 ~g g-i
day-l.
This
rate
of c o p p e r
accumulation
for A.
dorrieni
amounts to c_~a0.65% of the total body c o p p e r per day. During 21 days feeding at a constant rate the amount of copper a c c u m u l a t e d
in the
body would therefore be 13.6% of the initial total body c o p p e r (82.8 ~g Cu g-l),
i.e.
11.3 ~g Cu g-l.
Zinc A significant
regression
could also be p l o t t e d
of the mean zinc a c c u m u l a t i o n
(P<0.01)
rate of A. dorrieni
(Fig.
2b)
against dietary
zinc concentration. The mean zinc a c c u m u l a t i o n rate of A_= dorrieni,
as c a l c u l a t e d from
the regression line in Fig. 2b, for an a m p h i p o d feeding on alder leaf litter from the same u n p o l l u t e d 2.21 ~g g-i day-l.
site (70.3 ~g Zn g-l; i SD 12.3) is
This rate of zinc a c c u m u l a t i o n
for A__~.dorrieni
amounts to ca 1.11% of the total body zinc per day. During 21 days
1513
a
15o
d
b
L
400 "
i" \~'
300-
\ "~
== ~ ~"
• % ","
o
•
•
• • •
~
100-
i, /i \
.
•
...
•
0 1
2
3
4
5
2
6
4
6
8
10
12
Dry wt. (mg)
Dry w t (mg)
Fig. 3 . Plots of (a) copper and (b) zinc concentrations (~g g-l) against dry weight (mg) for two samples of Arcitalitrus dorrieni collected from Budshead wood, Plymouth. T h e ~ i n e s drawn are the bestfit lines of the power relationship (y= axe).
o~
loo •
•:
, • . ,
=~
sell
.:
,oo
8
~
1o
Dry wt. (mg)
Dry wt. (rag)
Fig. 4.. Plots. of lOgl0 metal concentration (~g g-l) (a) copper and (b) zlnc agalnst lOgl0 dry weights (mg) of Arcitalitrus dorrieni collected from Budshead wood, Plymouth.
151~
feeding at a constant rate,
the amount of zinc accumulated would
therefore be 23.3% of the initial body zinc
(199 ~g Zn g-l),
i.e.
46.4 ~g Zn g-1.
Field survey
Rainbow
& Moore
(1986)
metal concentration concentration, power function,
have
reported
in amphipods,
effects
of b o d y
the relationship
(y) and body dry weight
size
on
between metal
(x) being modelled by the
y=ax b. Animals of less than 2 mg body dry weight
exhibited elevated metal concentrations
(probably as a feature of
the relative increase in surface area available for adsorption in small animals).
To minimise size effects it was intended wherever
possible to analyse only large
(>2 mg)
individuals,
the inherent small size of Arcitalitrus dorrieni, able in some instances to include values for small pods
in o r d e r
to m a i n t a i n
a statistically
but,
due to
it was unavoid(< 2mg) amphi-
satisfactory
sample
size. As such it was essential to account for any significant relationships of metal concentrations against body weight.
Fig. 3a shows a
plot of copper concentration against dry weight for A__~.d o r ~ e n ~
from
Budshead Wood, Plymouth. The data revealed a clear size effect, with small amphipods having
much raised metal concentrations. Similarly,
Fig. 3b shows a plot of zinc concentrations against dry weight for a different sample of the same
population. Clearly it is meaningless
to compare mean metal concentrations between amphipods without allowance for this size effect. Data for individual dry weights and metal concentrations were therefore transformed. The step of taking logarithms (logl0) transforms the power equation y=ax b into the straight line log y = log a + blogx. The transformed data are then amenable to
1515
t r e a t m e n t by p a r a m e t r i c statistics,
and the d e r i v e d linear r e g r e s -
sions can be c o m p a r e d by A n a l y s i s of C o v a r i a n c e
(ANCOVA)
(Sokal &
Rohlf, 1981). Figures 4a and 4b show the same data as Figs 3a and 3b but now log transformed. There is now no s i g n i f i c a n t (P>0.05) r e g r e s sion a g a i n s t b o d y dry weight for either metal,
in this p a r t i c u l a r
example.
TABLE 2. A r c i t a l i t r u s ~orrieni: the n u m b e r (n) and dry w e i g h t s (mg, mean and range) of a m p h i p o d s a n a l y s e d for (a) copper and (b) zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n s with d e t a i l s of the r e l a t i o n s h i p log y = l o g a+blogx, where y is the metal c o n c e n t r a t i o n (~g g-l), and x is the dry w e i g h t (mg) and ~ and ~ (the r e g r e s s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t ) are constants. SIG. REG. is the s i g n i f i c a n c e of the r e g r e s s i o n ; ns not significant. Dry W e i g h t Site
(mg)
(min,max)
Double log r e g r e s s i o n
n
Mean
Range
b
SIG REG
log a
i0 15 i0 i0 9 i0
1.27 3.95 3.81 1.27 2.42 3.80
0.9 1.8 0.7 0.9 0.5 5.5
1.9 6.8 13.7 1.9 6.1 6.1
-0.123 -0.376 -0.342 -1.240 0.029 0.029
ns ns P<0.05 ns ns ns
1.374 0.964 1.002 -1.664 1.899 1.843
I0 15 l0 i0 9 i0
1.27 3.95 3.81 1.27 2.42 3.80
0.9 1.8 0.7 0.9 0.5 5.5
1.9 6.8 13.7 1.9 6.1 6.1
-0.071 0.280 -0.255 -0.174 -0.392 -0.308
ns ns P=0.05 ns ns ns
2.087 2.218 1.392 2.075 1.302 1.389
(a) C o p p e r Trelissick Carbis Bay St. E u n y Budshead Kew G a r d e n s Colonsay (b) Zinc Trelissick Carbis Bay St. Euny Budshead Kew G a r d e n s Colonsay
Copper
Table 2a s u m m a r i z e s the i n f o r m a t i o n on the double log r e g r e s s i o n s of body c o p p e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n against dry w e i g h t for A. dorrieni. For one site, St Euny,
there was a s i g n i f i c a n t r e g r e s s i o n
in s p i t e of the
t r a n s f o r m a t i o n of the data. A N C O V A allows the c o m p a r i s o n of c o p p e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s in a m p h i p o d s from d i f f e r e n t locations, by c o m p a r i n g the e l e v a t i o n of r e s p e c t i v e r e g r e s s i o n lines.
]516
A c o n v e n i e n t m e t h o d for p r e s e n t i n g such c o m p a r a t i v e data is to use each r e g r e s s i o n e q u a t i o n to estimate the c o p p e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n of an amphipod
of s t a n d a r d body weight.
Table
copper c o n c e n t r a t i o n of landhoppers confidence
limits
antilogarithms
(asymmetrical
3 presents
the e s t i m a t e d
of 5 mg dry w e i g h t w i t h
a b o u t the e s t i m a t e
of the t r a n s f o r m e d data).
Table
95 %
after taking
3 also p r o v i d e s
a
summary of the results of i n t r a s p e c i f i c c o m p a r i s o n s by ANCOVA. The copper c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of amphipods from sites s h a r i n g a c o m m o n letter in the A N C O V A do not d i f f e r significantly.
TABLE 3. ~ ~ : e s t i m a t e s of c o p p e r and zinc concentrations (~g g-~), w i t h 95% c o n f i d e n c e limits (CL) for amphipods of 5 mg s t a n d a r d i z e d dry w e i g h t d e r i v e d from b e s t - f i t double log regressions. Samples s h a r i n g any letter in A N C O V A c o l u m n for one metal are not s i g n i f i c a n t l y different. Site
Copper conc.
Trelissick Carbis Bay St Euny Budshead Kew g a r d e n s
45.3 67.5 61.4 15.4 68.1
Of p a r t i c u l a r
note
(CL) 34.9,58.8 50.8,89.6 40.7,92.6 2.6,91.6 45.8,77.1
any other site.
a b,c,d,e d,e a,c,e a
is the r e l a t i v e l y
tion for A_~. d o r r i e n i is not s u f f i c i e n t
shown.
c o n c e n t r a t i o n s were ent n a t u r a l
(Dines,
which
low body copper concentraalthough
the r e d u c t i o n
the
SW C o r n w a l l
sites,
lowest at T r e l i s s i c k
were
however, once
of the w i d e v a r i a -
indicated by the w i d e c o n f i d e n c e
or a n t h r o p o g e n i c m e t a l
lodes
132,238 a 125,179 c 69.4,131 e 52.2,1714 a,b 106,149 d
is p r o b a b l y a r e f l e c t i o n
Carbis Bay and St Euny, copper
ANCOVA
to cause a s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e from that at
This
For
(CL)
177 149 95.3 299 125
from B u d s h e a d wood,
bility in the data at this site, limits
Zinc conc.
ANCOVA
A__~.d o r r i e n i
gardens,
influences.
copper
with no appar-
The s a m p l e s
from
are from sites w i t h n e a r surface
the
scene
of m u c h
mining
activity
1956).
Table 4 p r e s e n t s the copper c o n c e n t r a t i o n s m e a s u r e d in the litter
1517
c o l l e c t e d from each site. There are no g r o s s l y e l e v a t e d c o n c e n t r a tions of copper in the litter Martin,
1982). ANOVA, however,
copper concentrations
were
(normal range 10-20 ~g g-l, H o p k i n & has shown
somewhat
(see T a b l e 4) t h a t litter
r a i s e d at B u d s h e a d W o o d and
Carbis Bay, but w e r e lower at the other t h r e e sites. It is u n f o r t u nate that the a v a i l a b l e data span only a l i m i t e d r a n g e of p o s s i b l e litter c o p p e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s . It w o u l d be i n s t r u c t i v e to o b t a i n data for an e n t i r e l y u n c o n t a m i n a t e d e n v i r o n m e n t or an e x c e p t i o n a l l y cont a m i n a t e d habitat.
T A B L E 4. Mean (SD) c o p p e r and zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of l e a f - l i t t e r from t h e c o l l e c t i o n s i t e s of ~ ~ . Samples snaring any letter in the A N O V A c o l u m n for one m e t a l are not s i g n i f i c a n t l y different. Litter C o p p e r conc. (~g g-l)
Site
Zinc conc. (~g g-l)
ANOVA
Trelissick 9.5 (3.3) Carbis Bay 11.4 (1.7) St Euny 5.7 (1.2) B u d s h e a d wood 16.2 (3.3) Kew gardens 9.8 (5.3) Colonsay 10.2 (0.96)
a b a b a a
88.5 66.7 91.1 496 50.3 148
ANOVA
(33.5) (ll.0) (27.8) (16.2) (17.7) (23.2)
a a a b a a
Zinc
Table 2b
summarizes the i n f o r m a t i o n on d o u b l e log r e g r e s s i o n s of
zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n St E u n y
there
for ANCOVA. confidence ANCOVA. trations
in A.
is a s i g n i f i c a n t
Table
3 presents
limits,
As T a b l e
together
3 shows,
in A__~.d o r r i e n i
tions were particularly, from
Budshead
dorrieni
wood,
and
against dry weight.
regression,
the with
there
estimated summaries
is a w i d e
from the sites
but
for
confirming
the
dry
with
95%
comparisons
by
of
weight
need
range
of z i n c c o n c e n -
sampled.
Zinc concentra-
and s i g n i f i c a n t l y , lower,
Again,
not
raised
in a m p h i p o d s
significantly
so,
in
1518
samples
from St Euny and Colonsay.
Table 4 p r e s e n t s the zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of litter from the collection sites.
A N O V A has shown that litter
BudsheadWoodare
zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
from
s i g n i f i c a n t l y (P<0.001) e l e v a t e d in c o m p a r i s o n with
the o t h e r sites. Hopkin & M a r t i n (1982) have shown that zinc concent r a t i o n s in u n c o n t a m i n a t e d litter can vary w i t h i n the range 50 - 300 ~g g-l,
i n d i c a t i n g that B u d s h e a d Wood leaf litter
is i n d e e d
zinc
enriched. Thus it w o u l d appear that A_~.d o r r ~ e n i may prove u s e f u l as a m o n i t o r of a m b i e n t zinc availabilities, copper,
and may s i m i l a r l y p r o v e u s e f u l for
over a w i d e r range of ambient c o p p e r a v a i l a b i l i t i e s .
DISCUSSION
There is no c o m p a r a b l e p u b l i s h e d i n f o r m a t i o n on the b i o a v a i l a b i l ities of h e a v y m e t a l s
at the
collected.
for the h i g h
The reasons
from B u d s h e a d
wood
remain
sites
from w h i c h
are
areas
Atkinson, appear
of p a s t
unclear,
1988),
not
to
extensive
although
influence
do~rieni
zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n although
aerial d e p o s i t i o n from local P l y m o u t h industry. Euny
A.
mining
it m a y
were
in litter be d u e
to
Carbis Bay and St
activity
(Dines,
1956;
it m a y be a r g u e d t h a t s u c h a c t i v i t i e s the
litter
metal
concentrations,
and
serious p o l l u t i o n is p r o b a b l y r e s t r i c t e d to the i m m e d i a t e area on and a r o u n d spoil tips
(Marples,
1979).
These studies have shown that A. d o r r i e n i is a net a c c u m u l a t o r of essential
trace metals and does not r e g u l a t e b o d y c o p p e r or zinc
concentrations. Weeks
(1990) had shown that s e m i - t e r r e s t r i a l tali-
trids eat p r o p o r t i o n a t e l y more m a c r o a l g a l m a t e r i a l w i t h low c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of c o p p e r or zinc than algal material with h i g h e r c o n c e n t r a tions of c o p p e r or zinc. The r e d u c t i o n in m e a s u r e d b o d y zinc concen-
1519
tration
in A r c i t a l i t r u s d o r r i e n i w h e n f e e d i n g at the h i g h e s t zinc
concentration may
similarly
reflect
such
feeding at high food metal concentrations.
a tendency
for r e d u c e d
Care, however, s h o u l d be
taken w h e n i n t e r p r e t i n g such results. It is p o s s i b l e that the amphipods w e r e not d i s c r i m i n a t i n g on the basis of c o p p e r or zinc concent r a t i o n s in the food, but that t h e i r c h a n g e in c o n s u m p t i o n rate was a r e s p o n s e to a d i f f e r e n c e in c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the anion (in this case chloride,
from the metal salt) w h i c h t h e y were able to taste.
W i e s e r et al.
(1976) p r o p o s e d that a g o o d m o n i t o r species s h o u l d
contain the e l e m e n t in p r o p o r t i o n to its c o n c e n t r a t i o n in e i t h e r the s u r r o u n d i n g m e d i u m or in the food, and s h o u l d c o n c e n t r a t e the e l e m e n t in some part of its body to increase the s e n s i t i v i t y of detection. A r G i t a l i t r u s d o r r i e n i satisfies the first of these conditions. T h e r e does not a p p e a r to be any s e l e c t i v e a d v a n t a g e in m e a s u r i n g the c o p p e r or zinc c o n c e n t r a t i o n s
of i n d i v i d u a l
body components when
it is
s a t i s f a c t o r y to use whole animals. H o p k i n e_~tal, (1986) a d v o c a t e d the use of t h e h e p a t o p a n c r e a s
of the w o o d l o u s e
Porcellio
scaber
for
m o n i t o r i n g the d i s p e r s i o n of c a d m i u m from a c o n t a m i n a t e d locus, due to its g r e a t e r s e n s i t i v i t y c o m p a r e d w i t h the use of w h o l e animals. Many t e r r e s t r i a l
invertebrates
are u n s u i t a b l e m o n i t o r s
of metal
pollution. H o p k i n (1989) put forward seven c r i t e r i a p e r t a i n i n g to the e s t a b l i s h m e n t of a regular s a m p l i n g programme. criteria
A feature of these
is t h a t the chosen animal s h o u l d be g e o g r a p h i c a l l y w i d e -
spread enough to allow direct c o m p a r i s o n s of c o n t a m i n a t i o n b e t w e e n w i d e l y spread areas. This is p r o b a b l y the single m o s t r e l e v a n t chara c t e r i s t i c at p r e s e n t p r e v e n t i n g the f u r t h e r d e v e l o p m e n t of A. dorri~ni as an "alternative"
Arcitalitrus
terrestrial biomonitor
d o r r i e n i has scope
in the U.K.
as a t e r r e s t r i a l
biomonitor
for
the e s s e n t i a l metal zinc and p o s s i b l y c o p p e r in the m e t a l l i f e r o u s
1520
districts of S.W. England. however,
will
limit
(though the species' land over,
(Australia), it is q u i t e
the
Its presently restricted distribution, extent
of
its
usefulness
range seems to be expanding).
however, likely
it has u n a s s e s s e d that
other
related
in B r i t a i n
In its native
potential.
More-
landhoppers
would
perform a similar function. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks are due to Dr P.S. Rainbow and Dr P.G. Moore for their help and discussion during this project and for reading drafts of the manuscript. Prof. M.H. Depledge is also thanked for discussion and critically reading the manuscript. The comments of Dr A.M.M. Richardson were also greatly appreciated.
REFERENCES
Atkinson,
B.
(1988).
Mininq
sites
in C o r n w a l l
an4
South-West
Devon, St. George Printing Works Ltd., 86 pp.
Bryan, G.W., Langston, W.J. & Hummerstone, biological Occas.
indicators
L.G.
(1980). The use of
of heavy metal contamination
Pu~l, No.l, Mar Biol. Ass. U.K.,
in estuaries.
73 pp.
Bryan, G.W., Langston, W.J., Hummerstone L.G. & Burt, G.R. (1985). A guide to the a s s e s s m e n t
of heavy m e t a l - l o a d i n g
contamination
in
estuaries using biological indicators. Occas. Publ. No.4, Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K.,
92 pp.
Coughtrey,
P.J., Martin,
M.H.
& Young,
E.W.
(1977). The woodlouse
Oniscus asellus, as a monitor of environmental cadmium levels. ~hemoshpere,
6, 827-832.
Dines, H.G.
(1956). The metalliferous mininq reqion o~f South-West
Enqland, Vol.l, Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain,
1521
England & Wales.
London HMSO,
& Sutton,
508 pp.
Harding,
P.T.
S.L.
(1988).
The spread of A r c i t a l i t r u s
dorrieni
in Britain and Ireland: watch this niche!.
Isopoda,
2, 7-10.
Hopkin, S.P. (1989). Ecophysiology o_~fmetals i_nnTerrestrial Invertebrates.
London,
Elsevier Applied Science,
Hopkin, S.P. & Martin, M.H.
366 pp.
(1982). The distribution of zinc, cadmi-
um, lead and copper within the woodlouse Oniscus asellus (Crustacea, Isopoda).
Hopkin,
Oecoloaia
(Berl.),
S.P., Hardisty,
G.N.
54, 227-232.
& Martin, M.H.
(1986). The woodlouse
Porcellio scaber as a "biological indicator' of zinc, cadmium, lead and copper pollution.
Marples,
A.E.
Environmental
Pollution,
11, 271-290.
(1979). The occurrence an d behaviour
of cadmium
in
soils and its uptake b v p a s t u r e qrasses i_~nindustriallv contaminated add naturally metal-rich environments. Mines,
Imperial College,
PhD thesis, Royal School of
London.
Martin, M.H. & Coughtrey, P.J. (1982). Bioloqical Monitorinq o_~fHeav7 Metal Pollution:
Land and Air.
London & New York, Applied Science.
Moore, P.G. & Rainbow, P.S. (1987). Copper and zinc in an ecological series of t a l i t r o i d e a n A m p h i p o d a
(Crustacea). Oecoloqia (Berl.), 73,
120-126.
Moore, P.G. Rainbow, P.S. & Hayes, E. (1991). The beach-hopper Orchestia qammarellus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) as a biomonitor for copper
1522
and zinc: North Sea trials.
The Science of the Total Environment,
I06, 221-236.
Phillips, D.J.H. (1980). Q u a n t i t a t i v e A a u a t i c Bioloaical ~nd~c~tors: Their use to monitor trace metal and orqanochlorin@ pollution. London, Applied Science Publishers Ltd.,
Rainbow,
P.S.
& Moore P.G.
amphipod crustaceans.
(1986).
488 pp.
Comparative metal
Hydrobioloqia,
analyses
in
141, 273-289.
Rainbow, P.S., Moore, P.G. & Watson, D. (1989). Talitrid biomonitors for copper and zinc Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science,
Sokal,
R.R,
Freeman,
& Rohlf,
F.J.
(1981).
Biometry,
21, 669-686
San Francisco,
W.H.
766 pp.
Weeks, J.M.
(1990). Th@ biology o_~fthe essential metals copper and
zinc in a n ecological University of London,
Weeks, J.M. & Rainbow,
series of tal~trid
amphipods.
PhD Thesis,
485 pp.
P.S.
(1991). The uptake and accumulation of
zinc and copper from solution by two species of talitrid amphipods (Crustacea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association U.K~., 71, 811-827.
Weeks, J.M. & Rainbow, measure the relative
P.S.
(1990). A dual-labelling technique to
assimilation
taking up trace metals from food.
efficiencies Functional
of i n v e r t e b r a t e s
Ecology,
4, 711-717.
Wieser, W., Busch, G. & Buchell, L. (1976). Isopods as indicators of the copper content of the soil and litter.
Oeco~oqi~
107-114. (Received in Germany 20 January 1992; accepted i0 March 1992)
(Berl.),
23,