Thermochemical
and kinetic
studies
on CeTe20,
dvlcrmmethe
1. Introduction The
thcrmochcmia~ry
of uranium. during
01 binary
plutonium
and
fisbion
of oxde
the irradiation
evaluating
their performance
an aggressive
and
chemical states in an irradiated
fuel
corrosive
lission
producls
fuels
producls
oxidr\
evant
to
vicwcd
nuclear
technology
hy Chattopadhyay
1II.It
is one of the
has
recently
and Juncja
and kinetics
been studied
by Krishnan ct al. 141. the lanthanidc elements
Gcncrall;. aqueous
(+3) in trivalent
as well
lanthanide
and
of ThTc,O,,
as solid actinide
hccn
[3]. The
the
rcthcr-
have recently
state. ions
reaction
lanthanum( CcTe,O,,
trivalent Since
have
of tellurium
191 has
compounds.
with
in many isomer
lanthanidc
hecn
oxide
Ln,O:Te
reported.
hut
[6-X1 no
and kinetic data are available
The vaporization
of of and
as and
relevant on these
kinetics of TeO,(g)
due
IO the decomposition of ZrTc,O,(s) were studied by Sorrel1 IlO] under isothermal conditions to evaluate the energy
of activation
In the present work. hehaviour
for ZrTe,O,. the X-ray.
of CeTe,O,
thermal
is reported.
and vapor-
The com-
pound decomposes as
the
similar
CcTe,O,(s)-CeOJs)
+ ZTeO,(g)
The vapour pressures of TeO,(g)
*Corresponding author
relared
is a chemical
111) monotelluroxidrs
thermodynamic
bation are
are closely
The
in faasl hrecdcr
mochcmistry
1.51. Ccrium
hcncc ;I study of the Cc-Te-0 system is relevant to understanding the hchaviour of the Pu-Te-0 system.
in diffcrcnt
cmhrittlcs
they
and also a large yield fission product.
is
cxizts Ihat
potcntlal. propcrlic\
;II
Tcllurimr
reack)rs 121. A thcrmodynamic datababc for lcllurium-hearing systems rcl-
steel cladding
ionic their
plutonium.
lormcd
1s importal)t
in a rcacIor.
producl
highly
lission
and ternary
(1)
over the mixture of CeTe,O,(s) and CeO,(s) were determined by employing the Knudsen effusion mass loss (KEML) technique. In addition, the data on the rate of decomposi-
3. Rebults and discussion
The
l’orm;alion
actton Ilom
and
TcO.
hy the wlid
AI 073 K wa\
powder diflraclion
1I.?].
lilcraturc i\oslructural
2. E~perimcnlrl
ol’ <‘cTc .O,,
of <‘CO. the X-ray
CcTc.O,,
has
hccn
rc-
IO hc
rcportcd
[1.31. Lope/
‘with <‘cSc.O,,
\,a(~
conlirmod
dala IC~OTWC~ in Ihc CI al. 1Yj lound
1ha1 rhc Iargc value of the uni1 cell and ~hc indexing 01 X-ray rcllcction5 wcrc incon\ibtcnl wllh lhc proposed CcTc.O,, ot CeO.
\\;I\ plcp,ircd (anal;~
(YY.Y% March) in a rinlcrcd
by hcding
pdc.
purit
m the molar ralio
alumina
a proud
mi\lure
) and
~W.U.Y%,
TcO,
I:2 a~ 07.7 K for 24 h
boa1 under Ilowing
air. Inlcrmil-
the mixture wrc wilhdrawn. ground ;md rchcatcd. The lorma:ioo ol the product \\.I\ conlirmcd
rcmlp
by the X-ray X-ray
dillraclirm
p.atcrn
diflractomctcr
using
rccordcd
Ni
liltcrcd
on a Diana Cu
KY
\Iruclurc
of
monoclinic
Rolto
and
IYI. the X-ray
rcportcd
rclincd
on
hy Lopu/
&II;I ol’ CcTc,O,,
powder
the prcscnt work wcrc indcvcd wcrc lurlhcr
[I?]. Ba\cd
Baran
cell paramelcrs
the
CI al.
prcparcd
in
and the ccl1 paramctcrs
hy 1hc Icaj!-squares
method
using
the computer programmc I AIIS\K IlJ]. The indcxod X-ray Dada cd CcTc,O,, arc eivcn in Tahlc I.
(A =
0.1541X nm) redialion. The
mas, loas mcasurcmcnt\
ol
1.0 ,: with
contamcd hcisht
a scnsitivlty
01 I pe.
in it machimblc
and
diamctcr
X mm
of
were carried
out in a
having a loading
C’ahn vacuum microbalancc.
horon
diamctcr
The
capacity
nilridc
ccl1 ol Y mm
:I central
with
1.0 mm on the iid. The
furnace
to within
+
I K.
whore temperature The Icmpcraturc
CcO,(\)
and CcTc,O,,(s)
was maintained by a
was mcasurcd
/J( Pa) = (dn,/dr)[ whcrc
cross-sectional
tcrmining
The Clausing
Au
[I II. The
conlinuously isothermal Knudsen vapour
ma
trmpcraturc. ccl1 were
prcsburc\
of In. Zn.
as a Iunction The
01 Tc,(g)
of lime al an
microhalancc
calibrated
by
Ag and
was monilorc:l
loss of the sample
on u recorder
and
dctcrmining
over Tc(s)
I l(~A)l(?.2X
x IO’)1
TIM
(2)
dwtldr is the rate of mass loss (g s ‘). A is the
tcmpcraturc
tcmpcralurcs
from the ralc
/one of a
chromcl-alumcl thcrmocouplc placed near fhc cell. The thormocouplc was previously calibrated by de the mcltmg
wcrc mcasurcd
ol mass loss using the relation
orilicc
cell was hcalcd
under vacuum (6x IO ’ Pa) in an isothermal re&tancc
was
\amplc
arca (K).
factor
as 0.524:! ~0.017X of Te,(g)
the the
Using
over TcO,(s).
orifice
(cm’).
T
in the prcscnl
hy dctcrmining
lhis
values reported
Clausing
factor.
is the
mas5 of the vaporil-
k is the Clausing
[IS].
lactor
study was derived
the rate of mass loss
over Tc(s) at various temperatures
vapc\ur prcssurc
and TeO,(g)
~,f the
M is rhc molar
(gmol ’) and
ing spccics
and using
[161.
in the litcraturc partial
wcrc mcasurcd
pressures
TcO,(g)
over TcO,(s)
prcbsurc
values agreed well with the Eltcrature
of
and the vapour values
1171. The over arc The
sampls
thermal S K min lyrcr
was hcatcd
conditions
’in
(model
in dry air
under
up to 1473 K at a constant
a SINKU-RICO TGD-7000)
(ULVAC) equipped
gold image heating
furnace.
was independently
monitored
non-isorate of
thermal
ana-
with
an infrared
The sample
temperature
by a calihratcd
Pt to
mcasurud
in Tablo
is good agrccmcnl lit values. perature
The
log I>(TeO,)(
Alumina
expressed
cups were
ment.
Isothermal
carried
out at 1173, 1193. 1213 and 1233 K in the n:,,ne
balance
heating
for evaluating
measurements
the kinetic
were
parameters.
kPa) + 0.07 = Gihhs
values of TcO,(g)
a~ various
tcmporalurcs
the corresponding
Isast-
the cxpcri::umtal 01 p(TcO,.g)
11213/7’(K)
energy change
tcm-
+X.78
for reaction (I)
(3) is
+ 2A,G=Te02(g)
- A,G”CeTe,O,,(s) A,G”
and the with
hy the cquation
hy the equation
A,G” = A,G”CeO,(s)
also
hetwccn
dependence
can hc reprcsentcd
The standard
sintercd alumina was used as the refcrencc material. A sample size of around ho mg was used in each experi-
pressure
2 and
squares lit is shown in Fig. I. It can hc !:c:en that there
PI + IO’% Rh thcrmocouplc
touching the sample holder. used as container material and
vapour
CcTc,O,,(s)+C’cO,(s) given
for CeTezO,,(s)
can be written
(4)
L,G”CcTe,O,,(s)
= L,G”CeO,(s)
+RTln whcrc
K is an cquilihrium
K =p’(TcO,)
+ U,<;“TcO,(g)
K
(5)
constant
t’or reaction
(I
).
given hy K = p?TeO:)cc, ro.‘ll<
(6)
c,<.
Assuming no interaction hetwccn condensed pha$cs which ale in equilibrium with TcO,(g). K can hc cxprcsscd a>
YW
IoilI 1016 10.11 lo43 IO.52
Thcrcforc 1,CXeTe,O,
(7) can bc evaluated as
A,G”CcTc,O,, =A,G”CeO,(s) +24C”TeO,(g) +2RTln p(Te0,)
(8)
Values of L\,G”TeO,(g) are taken from the literalure. assuming TeO:(I) as standard state. as our
I x07
4X7-1
3Y53
13.llto
4.447
IV155
7.027
'7706
li7Yfl
369.35
IZ.YuY
JS.h?X
Io6X
2O.lYh
IO80
2.5 IYY
X6.llO
IW2
31.567
III.XY6
6S.W
1104
38.340
I44h46
Ill6
47.872
IXS.YR7
mca\urcd
tempcraturc
tempcraturc
studies
of TcOI(s).
Lv,G’CcTc,O,,(s)
lit
Hcncc
= ~,G”CcO,(s)
i
ahovc
the melting
Eq. (X) hecomcs t ?A,GTeO,(l)
followed
2RTln p(TcO,)/p”(TcO,)
(Y)
with
composed
rcspcct
to
was calculated
time
The
from
mass
ments with respect to time (min) whcrc
/r’(TcO,)
is the partial
over liquid TcO,.
p”(Tc0,)
formation
of TeO,(g)
using the relation
data [IX]. The free encrgics of and TeO,(l) [ IY] arc values of CcO,(s)
from
the
d,G”CeTc,O, the following
[Ih]
The
data.
reported
arc given in T&k
values
2 and cxpresscd
for hy
relation:
A,(;” < CcTc,O,,.s.T
o = (u’: - W,,,l( w, - W,,)
at time
I and
the
> rt 20.0 kJ mol
’
controlled
hy Our
either
The thcrmogravimctric
curve in Fig. 2 indicates
the
suggests
decomposition
ing equation
with
sample
was idcntitied
tellurile. Based
thermal
CeOz
on
and
the cxpccted pattern
indicated the
from
the
data
X-ray
observed
loss for 2mol of the
the presence
decomposition
obtained
partly
of CeOz during
of the compound.
diffraction weight
loss
TcO,.
The
decomposed and the
cerium non-iso-
four tem-
peratures were chosen, 1173, 1193. 1213 ar,d 1233 K, to carry out the isothermal heating experiments IO eualuale the kinetic
The
parameters
(Y
(Y
such as rate constants
and
studies
or
phase
houndary
on the reaction
showed phase boundary
mecha-
control.
The
observed linearity in the rate of evaporation at each temperature as sbown in Fig. 3 in the present study
initiation of weight loss at I I73 K and the weight becomes constant at 1323 K. The product ZII the end of
diffraction
respectively.
kinetic models [20] to choose
diffusion
earlier
nism of ThTe,O,,
as pure
weight
the weight
The mechanism of the decomposition reactions resulting in solid/so!id and gaseous products may he
(YO2
reaction.
X-ray
linal
values were tit to various
weight.
yielding the best linear fit for the entire range for all the four tcmpcrstures.
(I())
data
(11)
W$,. W, and W, arc the initial
whcrc
the model
= -IhMX+().44Xh7‘(K)
agreed
(Y dc-
loss measurc-
data used in this study are
taken from the reported taken
pressure
fraction
at each temperature
constant
that
the
surface
throughout
ary controlled
area
of
the
reactant
hy the phase hound-
mechanism:
g(o) = I - (I - o)” = krlr,, where l/2
u is the fraction and
1
symmetries: the function the
reactant
dimensional (12)
is
the a range. and the rate govern-
can he represented
for
(12)
reacted
three-.
IWO-
and 11 is equal IO 113. and
one-dimensional
r,. is the radius of the reactanl and x(a) is of ~1. Assuming that the change in radii of to
the
symmetry
product
is negligible,
for
the value of n &comes
oneI: Eq.
reduces tc
energy of activation. The weight
loss at each isothermal
temperature
was
(13)
I lT( K) m ,m Arrhcnius
nlot as shown in Fig. 4 gave
4. Cunclnsion CcTe.0,. TeO.(
p)
i\
found
as the
pressure\
ol’ TcO,(S)
wcrc dctcrmincd The CYvalues calcu!ated
at lo-n isothermal
tcmpera-
lures. 1173. 1193. 1213 and 123.1 K. wcrc lit IO Eq.
(13)
and hcsl lit linear plots wcrc ohlai!icd in each cast as shown in Fig. 3. The rate constants k derived from the slopes of the linear given
in Tahlc
plots
3. The
at Ihesl: tcmpcralures
rcprescntation
of
arc k and
-In
techniqus. lion
inu air
were
diiions action
and
CeTe,O,(s)
IO
the vapour and CeO,(s)
&fusion
mass loss
free cncrav of the forrna-
was ohtaincd
f&m
the TeO.(g)
pressure for the first time.
The kinetics
of the dccomuosition studied
and achvation
cvalualcd. I
over
incongrucntly
spccics
bv the Knudsen
The molar Gibbs
or: CcTc.O,(s)
vapour
IO vaporize
vapori@
The
reaction
under ‘isothermal
in llow-
heating
con-
energy and rate constants
were
mechanism
of the decomnosition
was fc und IO he phase boundary
re-
controlled.
*ooj 3 80
*
1
Acknowledgments The authors
360 i
5
are thankful
tor. Radiochemistry
Jam. Head. Fuel Chemistry interest in this work.
3404
3 20
to Dr.
D.D.
and ~solope Group Division
Sood.
Direc-
and Dr.
H.C.
for their
keen
J
300!I (I 80
,
011
, 0 82 IIT
Fig. 4. Arrheniw CeTe>O.(\).
/ 0 03
I
/ 0 84
0 85
11, . 1000
References
086
III M.G
Adamwn. E.A. Auken and T.R. Lmdemer. 1. Nd.
the I_‘] H. Klcvldmp. 1. Nd
~f~urr.. 1.31(IYXS) 121.
s-(
h
hn\hr,,
1.1 r,,
I J
_‘I-, (,W/T,
7%.VJ