Appkd Catalysis, 16(1985)209~-214 Elsevier
Science
TITRATION CHLORIDE
S.
Publishers
B.V., Amsterdam
OF HYDROGEN
--Printed
CHEMISORBED
in The Netherlands
ON SUPPORTED
PLATINUM
CATALYSTS
BY FERRIC
SOLUTION
SZAB6 and
Central
F. NAGY
Research
Institute
Hungarian
for Chemistry,
Budapest,
P.O. Box 17, Hungary.
(Received
1 November
1984, accepted
2 January
Academlf of Sciences,
H-1525,
1985)
ABSTRACT It has been shown that titration of hydrogen chemisorbed on supported Pt catalyst by 0.1 M FeC13 solution in 1 M HCl electrolyte under oxygen free conditions can be used for surface determination. There is no hydrogen spillover in HCl solution.
INTRODUCTION Measurement routinely
gas-phase
to data published
methods
It follows
for surface
that a simple
in a suitable
which
It follows
Pt catalyst
that only
would
Taking
conditions
thereby
in a
adsorbed
on a supported
published
these compounds
agents
is still
earlier
may undergo
can be used for titration
falsifying
of the oxidizing
the above discussed
seemed
suitable
the oxygen
content
Pt has self-
On the other
in the presence
agent
but
of a supported
the results.
0 1985 Elsevier
conditions,
for this purpose
is higher
of
than the
ferric
Publishers
in
ions can
as organic
can only be made under oxygen-free
in different
electrolytes
in the final dispersity Science
an FeClS solution
because
ions and they do not decompose
such a titration disolved
cause discrepancies
0166-9834/85/$03.30
agent
system.
often do. Of course,
would
by an oxidizing of Pt dispersity
of the method
itself can be oxidized
the Pt nor the chloride
because
and
results.
but there
hydrogen
because
catalysts.
measurements
recognized,
be so high that the chloride
of a catalyst
in different
the same dispersity hydrogen
has almost
of the titration.
oxidizing
also be oxidized,
acid medium
neither
oxidants
titration
inorganic
into consideration
hydrochloric oxidize
agents
the results
of the PtClg-/Pt
gave
Deficiency
ions if the redox potential
potential
dispersity
is already
to measure
catalysts
electrochemical
of chemisorbed
14-51.
cannot
platinum
be used for determination
oxidizing
falsifies
hand, the Pt content chloride
method
solution
their redox potential
[l-3],
This possibility
been the use of organic oxidation
of platinum
determination
might
experimental
in water
on supported
earlier
titration
electrolyte
Pt catalyst.
no suitable catalyst
chemisorbed
been used for determination
According
supported
of hydrogen
B.V
used in the
results.
210 EXPERIMENTAL
METHODS
A three-compartment investigation
by titration
FeC13 solution.
curves
During
Deoxygenation
Titration
of hydrogen
cell as described
HCl electrolyte electrode
in which
the titrations
Platinum
powder
0.5 g Pt/ml
vacuum.
Introduction
Pt/A1203
platinum
ions without conditions
ads
of the charging solution
saturation
have
oxygen.
the catalysts
gas.
Pt catalyst
was made
electrode
in the same
in the same 1 M
A platinized
to indicate
the actual
Pt needle redox potentia
of the cells. by dissolving
the measured
from the solution
of H2PtC16
at 3-5°C with 50' KOH solution. with triply
catalyst
into an electrolvte
destroying
RFCELKIS
solution
in electrolyte
quantity
containing
structure
of platinum
and finally earlier
becomes
of chloride electrolyte
dried
in
Burette.
chloride
it should
solution
was
171.
Automatic
first
ions
be
containing
or activity.
catalysts
even if a deoxygenated
The catalyst
containino
solutions
into an electrolyte
its original
the surface
water
as described
with a type OP-930
from the air, in the presence
Since
saturated
in with
ions some Pt may be is used, according
reaction:
7 4Cl- + 2H+
(PtCl$
distilled
was prepared
catalysts
from the catalyst
to the following
Pt + 0
was deposited
were performed
chemisorbed
dissolved
after
were performed.
was prepared
how to place the Pt catalyst
atmospheric oxygen
catalyst
of a Pt catalvst
studying
chloride
catalyst
in 0.1 M HCl solution.
free of electrolytes
The titrations
decided
solution
was completed
Supported
When
powder
. 4.5 ml 40. CH20 solution was added to every ml of H2PtC16 solution
and the reduction then washed
curve and the charging
due to dissolved
Pt hydrogen
electrode
in the main compartment
grade FeC13.6H20
errors
in the
161.
was a platinired
0.1 M FeC13 titrating of reagent
nitrogen
on supported paper
was used as an indicator
of the electrolyte
of hydrogen
by ourified
adsorbed
electrode
charging
on a platinum
or the measurement
in order to avoid
in our earlier
The reference
cell was used
of the cell and the FeC13 titrating
of traces
was effected
adsorbed
the titrations
deoxygenated
(and purging
hydrogen)
electrochemical
of electrochemical
of hydrogen
both the main compartment
been continuously
with
bottomed
of the similarity
curve measured with
platinum
+
(PtCl,)'-
ions can dissolve
+HO 2
and deposit
(I)
once more changing
thereby
the activity
of the catalyst. In accordance the gas-phase
with our earlier
and the catalyst,
into a deoxygenated For the above
experience
without
[S], Oads must be reduced
any contact
with
Hz in
with air, can be introduced
electrolyte.
reasons,
in our experiments
the catalyst
sample
was poured
into
211
‘8 FIGURE
1
1, Charging
curve of 0.3 g Pt powder
the same Pt powder measured
we switched
deoxygenated continued Having purified
with
to hydrogen
hydrogen
up to the saturation
of the catalyst the surplus
with hydrogen
in
and finally
Before
methods
carried
we had a catalyst
platinum
cathodic
chemisorbed
on massive _
the titration
of hydrogen
that the result
of surface
adsorbed
of our titration
determination
For this purpose,
catalysts,
out by strong
of hydrogen
be verified
in water
in the Pt-bottomed
0.3 g Pt powder at first by electric titration
with
converge,
it can be stated
Taking between
0.1 M FeC13
into consideration the two curves
catalysts
solution
sample whose
saturation
out of the cell by
surface
was saturated
on supported
Pt catalysts
electricity.
(curve
the charging
1 in Figure 1)
curve of
and then by
1). Since the two curves
have given
the same surface
of other measurements,
area.
the discrepancy
the hydrogen
adsorbed
on Pt
with 0.1 M FeC13 solution. to satisfy
Pt catalyst
In theory,
of other
solution.
5Z, therefore,
it is not enough
of a supported
it had to
was the same as the results
cell we determined
by titration
was
by FeC13 solution
current
the results
with hydrogen
Pt catalysts
(curve 2 in Figure
never exceeded
however,
potential
does not conduct
by hydrogen.
was flushed
polarization.
that the two methods
can be determined
In practice, electrode
sample
hydrogen
1 M HCl solution.
In the case of massive occasionally
When this was
electrolyte
to the cell and bubblingOf hydrogenWas
finished nitrogen
Titration
1 M HCl supporting
and finally
was added
saturation,
= 5 mA). 2, Charging curve of
out from the cell by nitrogen.
the dry cell and then air was purged finished,
(I
with 0.1 M FeC13 solution.
by titration
during
cannot
this condition be measured
titration
because
the
if the support
the catalyst
potential
212
0’ FIGURE 2 platinized solution
c
‘8
1, Titrated
charging
Pt needle
indicator
‘16
Q,C
curve of 0.5 g Pt powder. electrode
as a function
2, Potential
of the volume
of the of titrating
(in coulombs).
e
I
0 FIGURE
3
1, Titrated
of 0.2 g Pt powder
and the redox potential
‘4 charging
(platinized
Pt needle)
3, Titrated
of the electrolyte
of a supported
‘8
curve of 0.2 g Pt powder.
and 2 g alumina.
potential
Q. c
Pt catalyst
electrode.
charging
2, Titrated
charging
must be the same, therefore,
may be measured
This concept
curve
curve of 2 g alumina.
via the electrolyte
the by a small
has been tested with a massive
Pt
213
0,8.
6 V .
04 . .
.
. 0 FIGURE
4
‘4 charging
because,
Pt needle
testing
and A1203
consequently,
of a supported
of hydrogen
Before
2, the Pt needle
sample;
ion of the surface
Titration
curve of 5 g Pt/A120,
chemisorbed
in order
experiment
give information
the amount
no spillover
Figure
of hydrogen
4. In this experiment
The H/Pt
and the
ratio measured
the same potential
platinum
catalysts
a mixture
as
by FeC13 solution
of massive
to find out what differences
about
hydrogen
measured
under such experimental
The titration
sample
can be used for the determinat-
of the support.
3 it can be asserted
of hydrogen
indicated
this method
Pt catalyst,
due to the presence
On the basis of Figure
electrode
on supported
a real supported
powder was examined
not change
of both the catalyst
Pt catalyst.
in the titration might
Catalyst.
could be measured.
to Figure
did the catalyst
‘8
Q, c
in this case, the potential
electrode
According
.
.
.
I
Titrated
catalyst
l
l
Pt
catalyst
would
arise
On the other hand, this
spillover
in an aqueous
that the presence
by titration.
phase.
of alumina
It follows
does
that there
is
conditions.
chemisorbed
on a Pt/A1203
we used the same catalyst
by pulse adsorption
catalyst
is illustrated
as in our earlier
in
paper
was 0.105 and by TPD of hydrogen
[9].
1.36
191. On the basis of Figure 4, the H/Pt ratio and the surface sample
can also be calculated.
ion of adsorbed hydrogen
A=
adsorbed
7.5 x IO 5x
hydrogen on
From the figure
is 7.5 C. Since
and charge
of the catalyst
required
210 uC is required
for the oxidat-
for the oxidation
1 cm2 surface CZ], the surface of 1 g catalyst
of
is:
-4
210 x IO-6
=
0.7 m2/g
(2)
214 Not only the surface given catalyst
of a supported
can be determined
into consideration
Pt catalyst
but also the H/Pt ratio of the
by the titration
that the Pt content
illustrated
of our catalyst
in Figure
is about
4. Taking
0.5% and 5 g was
used in the titration:
H/Pt
=
(7.5/96500)/(5
which
is between
that pulse surface
x 0.5 x 10-2/195)
the results
adsorption
measurements
area than the real value,
Finally
it must be mentioned
the titration.
Reaction
and then it slowed down, catalyst. about
measured
(3)
by other methods
give a smaller,
that two periods
[9]. It is very probable
whereas
the TPD method
in our earlier
papers
could be distinguished
20% of the titrating
in our opinion,
It is interesting
0.6
as has been shown
of the first
the same as the result
=
solution
due to slow diffusion
a greater [lO,ll].
during
was very fast
in the pores
of the
that the result of the fast part of our titration
is
of pulse adsorption.
REFERENCES 1 2
10
11
L. Spenadel and M. Boudart, J. Phys. Chem., 64 (1960) 204. A.N. Frumkin, Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering, Vol. 3, p.315, Interscience, New York (1963). J. Bett, K. Kinoshita, K. Routsis and P. Stonehart, J. Catal., 29 (1973) 160. L. Freidlin and K.G. Rudneva, Izvest. Acad. Nauk USSR, Otdel. Khim. Nauk. (1954) 491. D.V. Sokolskii, Hydrogenation in Solutions (in Russian), p.172, Alma-Ata (1962). S. Szab6 and F. Nagy, J. Electroanal. Chem., 70 (1976) 357. J. Margitfalvi, S. Szabd, F. Nagy, S. GUbolos and M. Hegediis, Preparation of Catalysts III, p.473, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1983). S. Szab6, F. Nagy and D. M6ger, Acta Chim. Acad. Sci. Hung., 93 (1977) 33. J. Margitfalvi, M. Hegedtis, S. Gobolos, E. Kern-T6las, P. Szedlacsek, S. Szabd and F. Nagy, Proc. 8th International Congress on Catalysis IV - 903 Verlag Chemie 1984. S. Szabb, D. Mdger, M. Hegedtis and F. Nagy, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 6 (1977) 89. F. Nagy, D. Mbger, M. Hegediis, Gy. Mink and S. Szab6, Acta. Chim. Acad. Sci. Hung., 100 (1979) 211.