Materials
Chemistry
TOPOTACTIC METHODS
E.
and Physics,
10 (1984)
CONVERSIONS OF
OXIDES
IRON
MENDELOVI
Cl,
Laboratorio
R.
OF
y-FeOOH
IN
MAGNETIC
VILLALBA
1010-A,
Received
31
de
579
AND
and
Fisicoquimica
Caracas
579-584
COMPARATIVE
TRANSFORMATION
SPINELS
A.
SAGARZAZU
Materiales,
CIC,
IVIC,
Apartado
1827
(Venezuela)
January
1984;
6
accepted
1984
March
ABSTRACT
The
DTA
taining the
of
a
small conversion
phase)
of
occurs peak
nor
does
it
when
the
appears
sample by
ing
H20.
zed
by
is
XRD
at
tR
materials
sol by
of
disks
of
additives
a
(1 -4%
state
SiOZ)
is
into
are is
reaction
containing
of alkali
the
not
spinels, folby
discussed
of
iron and
halides
as
boil-
characteri-
also
heating
ex-
affected,
alkoxide)
transformations
combination
metastable
magnetic
products
conthat
temperature
(iron
solid
sample shows
y-Fe203
reflux
solid
final
te
y-FeOOH
FeOOH at
This id
the
synthetic
of
resulting and
docroci manganese
(through
pure,
gl’ycerol
spectroscopy.
into
cycles
500”.
the
lepi and
Quartz
with
the
203 in
reacted
with
pressing
-.
y-FeOOH
and
a-Fe
transformation
comparatively magnetic
to whereas
of
1 i zed quartz
the
hydrolysis Starting
crystal
goethite,
y-FeOOH
hamper
1
we1 of
44O”C,
at
othermic
lowed
natural,
amounts
oxides
grindingdiluting
agents.
I NTRODUCTI The ence
ON
solid-state or
vestigated and dide
in
hematite disks,
conversion
absence our may by
a
of
synthetic
like
alkali
laboratory. be
Thus,
to
transformed
combination
of
it
iron
has
magnetite,
heating
oxides
halides
and
has shown
been in
diluted
grinding-pressing
in been that
the amply
presin-
goethite alkali
i ocycles
[1,21.
0254-0584/8?/$3.00
0 Elsevier
Sequoi~/Printed
in The Netherlands
580 In ted
the
context
that
sing
of
pure
y-FeOOH was
the
te
where
transformation
of
al
[4,51.
On
the
formation
into
magnetic in
AI,
Si,
Iepidocroci
(see
Table
using
The
1).
characterize
the
oxides
a
and
Mn,
te,
which
first
described
pure
lepidocroci
iron
oxides
In
this
decomposition
of
in
this
I
by
Mendelovici
may
undergo
trans-
glycerol
At
this
the
stage
presence we
amounts
work
is
of
natural
transformation
structural,
mechano-chemical
framework, smal
of
(y-Fe203)
with
.
f6f
te
te
te
reacting
contains
the
miscellaneous
been
reporproces-
lepidocroci
The
have
etc.
also
maghemi
preserved. during
purpose
study
or
1e
occuring
reaction of
Ti,
tab
thermochemical
after
two-step
been
comminution
cl-FeOOH
me tas
is
synthetic
has
dry
te
no
changes
transformation
like
natural
in
lepidocrocite
hand,
it of
goethi
case,
pseudomorphism
other
the
like
magnetic
temperature
studying
reactions product
latter unlike
and
tives
final
detected,
Iepidocroci
flux
id-state
the
, In
morphological
et
sol
is
oxyhydroxides
[3,41
phase
of
hematite
reare
of
have
of to
at we
addichosen
Si
and
a
Mn
comparatively lepidocrocite
methods.
EXPERIMENTAL
The was
natural
kindly
lepidocroci supplied
After
(Paris). solved
in
rian
1200
was
carried
and
model
1730
(50
by
was
and
model
MnO
total
the
Ti
were to
form
DISCUSS
detected these
to
the
anatysis
16
the
hr
at
by
using
AAS
Fe-Ka
R absorption
solid
Mines
was
disa
Va-
DTA
with
(Stanton
water-free
followed with
radiation
spectroscopy
and g)
245*C,
reacted
it
using
(3
des
mesh),
characterization
mineralogical
I
Wurtemburg’
Nationale (150
diffraction
sample
Lubeneck,
by
boiling
therglycerol
thorough
was-
water.
I ON
analysis Si02
a
Ecole
sieving
chemicat The
for of
and
the
I
as
spectrophotometer)
of
performed
of
of
diffractometer),
chemical
(2.47%)
in
due
AND
labeled
and
powder
model
hydrolysis
RESULTS
A
X-ray
Reaction
cc)
Museum mixing
submitted
283
moanalyzer).
the
sample
spectrometer.
out
(Perkin-Elmer
hing
by
crushing,
HCI
(Philips
te
(1.39%)
separate in
elements
of
the
as
impurities
phase,
this are
sample, ruled
lepidocroci (Table
quartz,
as
therefore out
in
te
shown
sample 1).
The
by
XRR.
possible the
Iepidocrocite
reveals latter No
perturbations study.
Al
is nor
581
1.
Analysis
Constituents
F20;
Table
of
Natural
Cepidocroci
te
by Atomic
FeOa
SiO2
MnO
K20
0.49
1.39
2.47
0.016
Absorption
Spectroscopy b
Ti02
LOI
none
12.38
A’ 203
H20
Total
(total)
%
83.68
a Determined 6
LOI
and
tively
by standard H20-
in
The
infrared
tions
of
bands
are
This of
band
lepidocroci
indicate by
the
UL
same
Shoulders
a)
Infrared
in
here
890
goethite
spectrum reaction
thermal
and
105°C
respec-
to
lepidocrocite.
as
centered
a
band
between 800 the
cm
the -1
samp
these The
at3140 Fe-O-OH
in
e,
Fe-O-H
of
synthetic
and in
absorp-
intensities
IO00
this
as
cm
-1
layers
spectrum
further
confir-
reaction
which to
In
cc-Fe203
at
5
diagram
of
the
the
the
500”,
natural,
endothermic
of takes
second the
lepidocrocite
glycerol
y-Fe
0
2 3 step
well
250
and
(0.25%
place
in
crystallized 301”,
a
steps. by
y-Fe203
at
is
two
accompanied
being
CSI
pellets);
hydrolysis.
lepidocrocite
process
effect
J
600
lcm-1)
natural
decomposition
dehydrates 300°C.
of
with
potactic
shows
and relative
1503
y-FeOOH -
as
at
of
2500~ \
b) after
at
1000
characteristic -1 1155 cm , due
H-bonding
WAVENUMBER
The
745
suggests
presence
3m
1.
at
XRD.
4000
Fig.
sample
displays
and
appears
also te.
the
1020,
positions
vibration
broad
med
at The
1)
(Fig.
practically
stretching
100.26
muffle.
lepidocrocite
.
the
0.32
K Cr 0 2 27
with
by heating
spectrum
[7]
methods
determined
a calibrated
vibrations
OH
were
titration
none
an
In
the
to
exothermic
its
the
step reaction
polymorph The (Fig.
exothermi
to-
first
nature.
lepidocrocite whereas
state
endothermic
transforms of
solid
DTA 2)
c
effect
.
582
Fig.
2.
T”Cthermal
Differential
crocite
(-
30
appears
at
440°C.
exothermic
mg),
at
crystal
1 i ni ty,
of
sample
the
calcined
Synthetic
peak
sented
using
analysis
at
,
When
other
alumina
whereas
the
heating
a
factors
(see
air)
Table
such 1)
may
of
as
lepidocrocite,
508”,
304”[81
(in
natural
reference.
however,
displays
endothermic
effect
material,
beside
as
particle
affect
the
lepido-
the
size
the
is
repre-
degree
and
of
composition
position
of
the
DTA
peaks. The
X-ray
diffractogram
lepidocrocite
with
responding lines
to
are to
goethi
te
4.187
both
The
of
peaks
lowed
by
and
Typical material
after
of
product)
cubic
spine1 .
dark
after
brown
quartz the
by have
is
goethite
disappeared,
of
transformed
are
Traces
at
of at
3.34
i,
and
and
or detected
and
well
with
solid the
at
this the
the
(fi-
pattern
ruled -
(Fig.
also
star-
brown
of
magnetite out
1.4%
SiO2
transformation.
at is
folboiling
dark
diffractogram
resolved
spine1
mixture
X-ray
be (at
spine1
o-FeOOH
for to
disordered
quartz
on
magnetic
since
gives
hamper
the
solid
and
cannot
y-Fe203 like
glycerol,
blackish
a
a
with
reddish-yellow reaction
resembling of
into
reacted
The
magnetic
again
is
the
observed.
disturb
appearance
detected
from
Impurities, not
positions
reflexion
are
glycerol
presence
cor-
diffraction
their
overnight
of
color,
mostly
the
peak
be
strongly
powder. do
undisturbed traces
is
oxide,
However,
centration), the
can
1 ized
6.2j’8i,
y-FeOOH
uninterferred
reacted
hydrolysis
after
at
crystal
lepidocrocite.
small quartz
being
green
peak of and
sample
changes to
hydrolysis,
nal
3b)
washing
we1 1
goethite.
lepidocrocite after
tin
of by
structure,
set
crystalline the
a
sharp
full
diffractogram,
by
oxide
indicates
and
The
synthetic
small
3a)
strong
the
interferred
natural
water.
a order.
recognized
Also
i,
020 on
that
are
i.
2.44
quite
the
indicated
similar
(Fig.
in
this
conIn
fact,
recorded 3b),
3.332
(Fig.
i.
transformed
this The
time goe th i te by
the
583
glycerol
reaction
latter
is The
IR
glycerol Here
lb. as
550
spectrum
of
elimination
the
only
370cm
maghemi
The
inter1
to In
ry.
iron
to
magnetic are
,
iron
broad
of
indicate
presence the
is
reaction
are
presence
the powder. with
represented
bands the
of
magnetic
after
alkoxide,
absorption
which
structures which
a-FeOOH), by
a
a
cubic
wide
range
spine1
contrast,
by
des
-1
*
lepidocrocite,
of
(orthorombic)
and inked
ranged
natural
two
The
0 2 3 ++Y304 [61 analysis the Fe
from
in
displayed of
Fig.
at
magnetite
as
well
te.
open
(y-FeOOH
y-Fe
also
and
and
of
into
inferred
for
octahedra
more
more
iron iron
via
close
an
iron
the case
of
rearintermedia-
hematite,
In
every
layers
easily
alkoxide like
packing,
mechanism
oxyhydroxides
octahedral are
structure
sluggish.
general
these by
hydrogen-bonding,
rigid
hexagonal is
The
produced.
of
of formed
structure
a
in
spine1
are
iron
formed
transformation the
alkoxide
iron
alkoxi
-
formation
b
Fig. b)
3. after
spine1
X-ray
“28 (random powders)
diffractograms
reaction oxide,
30”
4v
5w
60”
with
Q = quartz,
glycerol
and
G = goethite.
hydrolysis. Spacings
20”
of:
a) L= are
IO”
natural
lepidocrocite;
lepidocrocite, given
in
M = Magnetic i.
4”
584
[61
involves
tion
of
condensation
the
iron
corresponds step
to
this
is
not
changed
mine
has
only
y-Fe203
been
0314
Thus,
during
the organic
reported
ted iron
oxide
was mitted
to
spinet In
is
it
disks) was
intensive
is
grinding, more
and
as
or
out
or
hematite
materials, .
had
resulting
in for
a
Here
be
(dilu-
goethite
previously
a defect
the
that
transitional
again,
to
is
oxide.
point
goethite
[1,2,f01
n-hexyla-
product
spinei
to
hematite
reactant
y-FeOOH
final
a magnetic
of
favorable
the
pyridine the
reaction
regenerates of
reaction
magnetic
detected
second
A topotactic such
interesting
whereas
is
03
Fe2c3
also
into
the
sub-
structure
formation
of
which
the
cubic
combination
of
structure. this
heating
solid-state
and
mechanism to
0
. In
f
reac-
calculatedformula
configuration
. In this which
transformed,
thermodynamically
Fe
+2
oxidation-reduction whose
*+
transformation
iodide
ly
Fe3
reagents
basis,
compound
readi
+3
initial
[9]
solid-state
atkali
product
transformation.
(magh emite)
the in
and
a
to
the
using
On a comparative during
Fe2
hydrolyzes
C3H803.
transformation
glycerol
giving
E(C3H5
compound
glycerol,
of
oxide,
the
with
cycles,
glycerol,
magnetic
ficant
mechanism,
grinding
the
spinels
changes
in
as
is
color
which well
involves
as
transition
accompanied
and
in
the
chemical
of
the
iron
by
magnetic
a
in
iron
reaction
oxide
materials
reduction
and
signi-
properties.
REFERENCES
1
E.
Mendelovici
2
S.
Yariv
3
E.
Mendeiovici,
(1982)
4
E.
E.
E,
Mendelovici,
Fuls, (1970) White
8
R,C.
Mackenzie,
Academic
10
S.
Acta,
Materials
R.
Vi llalbe
and
A,
Sagarzazu
and
S.
Nadiv
I.
A.
36
Chemistry,
(1980) 5
25.
(1980)
37.
Sagarzazu,
R.
Vijlalba,
Mat.
Res.
Bull,,17
and
Lin,
J.
of
Materials
Sci.
and
Press,
Desiraju Yariv,
(1979)
and
Fripiat
J .J.
Ciays
and
Clay
Minerals,
53.
W.6,
G.R.
Mendeiovici,
Rodrique
L.
7
9
Thermochim.
press].
P.F. 1;
Yariv.
1017.
Mendelovici,
(in 6
and
S.
241.
(1982) 5
and
E. 519.
R.
Roy
Am.
Miner.,49
Differential New York, and
M.
Mendelovici,
Rao.
(1964)
Thermal London, Ma_t. R.
Res.
Villalba
1670.
Analysis. p.
Vol,
1,
1970
276. Bull.,~ and
M.
(1982)
443.
Cohen.
Nature,Z;iP