319
TOWARDSA NEW THEORY OF DISTRIBUTIVE Amherst,
Massachusetts:
Pp. ix + 148, [Editor's book:
Note.
The editor
of a faculty
exceed
of
the
supply
of
author
considers
of distribution
six
have all
looks
fallen
short
The author
of
pretation which
used to
resolve model
which
He then
extreme
stayes. efficiency
He does this The less
need and merit
in
the
the
for
a
which
that
are
basic
they
distribution
in
the
four
related
the
three These
his
economics,
interstages
and and distri-
of goods
in each of the
the
the
greater
resulting
to
economics,
comfort,
and the greater the
is
economic
subsistence,
premise,
distribution
to formulate
the
are
analysis.
production,
production,
of
On that a just
used to form
sentences
an economy is,
language
language
tools to
availability
in production
of
of
this
each of
scarcity,
nature
problem
for
pertaining
by defining
to the
productive
and ability
and models
problems."
the
and these
uses these
he recognizes: relate
solve
are
are made up of words
as they
him.
because:
the
philosophical to
values
sentences
distribution
bution
into
The alphabet
product.
of a just
affluence.
from
whether
and concludes
interpretation
"insights
a language
and distribution.
theories
justice
adequate
that
aforementioned
sentences
Bowie's
their adherents do not understand the problem of distributive justice they are not sufficiently inclusive their adherents demand too much of them.
states
of an economy's six
other
to satisfy
in determining
different
distributive
2. 3.
word justice
and the
available
as primary
at several
with
often
Professor
Happiness Liberty Equality Merit Optimization or Efficiency Ability or Skill
1.
already
viewpoint
of
is just:
to deal
he develops
two reviews
student's
values
65: He then
for
goods and services
:: 3. 4u
the
asked
Towards a New Theory of Distributive Justice is an --ethical problems faced when man's wants and desi
the
system
attempt
1971.
member.1
Norman Bowie's examination
--Norman Bowie. of Massachusetts Press,
The University
&
$9.00.
one from a graduate
that
JUSTICE.
the
importance
product.
four
need for of
The more
320
affluent
an economy is,
liberty
and happiness
the in the
and services.
Therefore,
when it
to
yields
and liberty. services
the
However,
rather
than
consideration. of
social costs
justice.
It
political
science,
in
itself
etc.
book,
source
to provide
Although
this
to arrive
at a new theory justice
involved
in
develops
and how
of distributive
the
subjects
problems,
of
social
have its
own criticism
as an outside
a different
of of
sociology,
with
will
to
face
account
problem
urban
the
benefits.
of economics,
reading
perspective.
to the
of people."
in
the the
or according be produced
the outcome question
4)
Bowie
analysis
to what
principles justly?"
his
With
only
the limited
the question: 7)
goods
and
discussion
discuss
can these (p.
and
of benefits
limits
directly
raises
Ph.D.
justice Traditionally,
of burdens.
author's
and distributed
author's
distribution
and does not
distribution
the
justice.
just (p.
of
of distributive
of distributive
of benefits
and services,
services
the
"refers
among a group
basis
with
book,
investigate
distribution
goods what
to
of
is
problems
the
valuable
may bear becomes
take
the
the
human values.
But he fails
does not
and
University
The objective
to the
it
of
which
be affluent
to
relations,
student
potential
efficiency
when dealing
may find
research,
burdens
that
with
fields
goods
distribution
of more lofty
each discipline
instructors
John Grimes Western Illinois
distributive
to the
just
as a country
approach
minority
the
also along
and philosophy
insufficient
society. to
may arise
a novel
development,
of the
an affluent
goods
of happiness
some points
he maintains
be distributed
lends
philosophy,
covered
of
is most just
physical
maximization
can continue
which
of
actual
individual
amount
development,
The theory
costs
should
greatest
constraint
has not
system
The book presents
economic
the
upon the
production.
various
the
upon the
importance
how this
inefficient these
distribution
For example,
subordinate
consider
of
and distribution
of economic
theory
importance
production
given
must be based more firmly The author's
the
Bowie contends,
individual
in many stages
econany
greater
and
"On
321
To reach Chapter
his
objective,
1, covering
erations,
is
approaches being: all
three
In chapter
author
discusses
his
approach
iate
classified of
living,
discussing
followinq
6 values.
be attained
for
is used to applies sentence
are the
of distributive
the
three
and potential
principle
of
While find
the
limits
criticism,
distributive
this book to
his
principles
directly
discuss
though
he states
agrees
with
the
be somewhat narrow the
reflects
economic
above mentioned
work He then
words.
economic
each justice
priority
rankings different
of
productive
author
is able
of having
of
should
to arrive
at
that
make
principles capacity.
to avoid
the
a single
justice.
reviewer
discussion
the
providing
the
that word
while
comprising
levels
,
in the
arrangements
values
distribution
thus
different
Bowie con-
distribution
and their
systems,
for
two intermed-
and Distribution
those
the
of words
scarcity,
arranged
various
income,
and the
values
between varying
the
and
affluence.
Word,
from
to each of
kinds
same, the justice
of
production
sentence
the
use of
oroblem,
distribution
with to
words
Economic
process,
up each word differ Throuph,the
Word,
extreme
societies,
three
are constructed
production
justice
While
and classifying containing
the
connect
the
and comfort
word comprises
a just
systems.
either
The production in
values
words
under
justice,
capabilities.
or affluence,
Production
These three
He identifies
distributive
comfort,
sentence"
manner:
Word.
for
to comfort,
values
a "justice
into
to distributive
theory.
productive
as existing
subsistence
After structs
based on their
his
take justice.
optimization-efficiency,
as important
societies
stages:
to develop
equality,
and ability-skill)
minimum standard
the
liberty,
Bowie feels
and do not
5 the
(happiness,
are
and socialism.
restrictive
distributive
model
consid-
traditional
These approaches
for
6 values
Societies
justice.
essential
a language
5'chapters.
to the
values
using
classifies
too
into
the
justice, merit,
devoted
egalitarianism, are
work
and methodological
chapters
to distributive
approaches all
his
remarks
by three
and solutions
consideration
the
introductory
followed
utilitarianism,
that
Bowie divides
to the costs
in chapter
due to the
distribution
or burdens 1 that
author's of
of this
endeavor, fact
benefits
that
the
author
and does not
distribution,
his, conclusions
he does
apply
even to both
the
322
benefits tical
and the structure
burdens.
In addition,
and analysis
the work
necessary
lacks
the
to be considered
theore-
a major
work
in economics. Despite
its
stimulating
shortcomings,
Bowie's
material.
While
used as supplementary
reading
important prove
questions
very
economic
raised
useful
the
bution
toward
issues
and problems.
Michael Western
in
and urban book is well
much needed
T. Pledge Illinois University
designed
because
and the
in a course
development,
In general,
not
book offers of
a great
as a textbook,
deal it
could
the many interesting
insights
comparative
provided. economic
It
of be
and could
systems,
problems. written,
inter-disciplinary
stimulating, discussion
and a contriof major