Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Laterality of Neurological Symptoms in Patients with Cervical Compression Myelopathy

Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Laterality of Neurological Symptoms in Patients with Cervical Compression Myelopathy

Accepted Manuscript Tract-specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Laterality of Neurological Symptoms in Patients with Cervical Compression Myelopat...

8MB Sizes 0 Downloads 61 Views

Accepted Manuscript Tract-specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Laterality of Neurological Symptoms in Patients with Cervical Compression Myelopathy Satoshi Maki, Masao Koda, Junya Saito, Sho Takahashi, Taigo Inada, Koshiro Kamiya, Mitsutoshi Ota, Yasushi Iijima, Yoshitada Masuda, Koji Matsumoto, Masatoshi Kojima, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Takayuki Obata, Masashi Yamazaki, Takeo Furuya PII:

S1878-8750(16)30813-0

DOI:

10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.129

Reference:

WNEU 4540

To appear in:

World Neurosurgery

Received Date: 22 July 2016 Revised Date:

29 August 2016

Accepted Date: 30 August 2016

Please cite this article as: Maki S, Koda M, Saito J, Takahashi S, Inada T, Kamiya K, Ota M, Iijima Y, Masuda Y, Matsumoto K, Kojima M, Takahashi K, Obata T, Yamazaki M, Furuya T, Tract-specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Laterality of Neurological Symptoms in Patients with Cervical Compression Myelopathy, World Neurosurgery (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.129. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Tract-specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reveals Laterality of Neurological Symptoms in

2

Patients with Cervical Compression Myelopathy

3

Satoshi Maki1,*, Masao Koda1, Junya Saito1 , Sho Takahashi2, Taigo Inada1, Koshiro

4

Kamiya1, Mitsutoshi Ota1, Yasushi Iijima1, Yoshitada Masuda3, Koji Matsumoto3, Masatoshi

5

Kojima3, Kazuhisa Takahashi1, Takayuki Obata4, Masashi Yamazaki5, Takeo Furuya1

6

1

7

1-8-1 Inohana Chuou-ku Chiba City, Chiba 260-8670, Japan

8

2

9

1-8-1 Inohana Chuou-ku Chiba City, Chiba 260-8677, Japan

RI PT

1

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine

SC

Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital

10

3

11

1-8-1 Inohana Chuou-ku Chiba City, Chiba 260-8677, Japan

12

4

13

4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba 263-8555, Japan

14

5

15

1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaragi, 305-8575, Japan

M AN U

Department of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital

Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences

TE D

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba

16

*Address correspondence and reprint requests to:

18

Satoshi Maki, MD, PhD

19

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine

20

1-8-1 Inohana, Chuou-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan

21

Tel: 043-226-2117, Fax: 043-226-2116

22

E-mail: [email protected]

AC C

EP

17

23 24

Keywords Diffusion tensor imaging, Spinal cord, Cervical compression myelopathy,

25

Laterality, Asymmetry index 1

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract

2

Backbround: Patients with cervical compression myelopathy (CCM) generally present

3

bilateral neurological symptoms in their extremities. However, a substantial portion of

4

patients with CCM exhibit laterality of neurological symptoms. The aim of this study was to

5

assess the correlation between intrinsic structural damage and laterality of symptoms using

6

spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the corticospinal tract.

7

Methods: We enrolled 10 healthy volunteers and 40 patients with CCM in this study. We

8

evaluated motor function using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score

9

for left and right extremities. For DTI acquisitions, a 3.0 T MR system with

SC

RI PT

1

diffusion-weighted spin-echo sequence was used. Regions-of-interest (ROIs) in the lateral

11

column (LC) tracts were determined. We determined the correlations between fractional

12

anisotropy (FA) and ASIA motor scores. An FA asymmetry index was calculated using left

13

and right ROIs.

14

Results: Four patients exhibited laterality of symptoms in their extremities, for which left and

15

right ASIA scores correlated moderately with FA in the left and right LCs respectively (left: ρ

16

= 0.64, P < 0.001; right: ρ = 0.67, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver-operator

17

characteristic curve showed the FA asymmetry index indicated laterality of symptoms.

18

Conclusions: Using tract-specific DTI, we demonstrated that microstructural damages in the

19

left and right corticospinal tracts correlated with corresponding neurological symptoms in the

20

ipsilateral side and the FA asymmetry index could indicate laterality in neurological

21

symptoms of patients with CCM.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

10

22 23

Keywords Diffusion tensor imaging; Spinal cord; Cervical compression myelopathy;

24

Laterality; Asymmetry index

25 2

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Introduction

2

Patients with cervical compression myelopathy (CCM), including cervical spondylotic

3

myelopathy, ossification of the longitudinal ligament, and cervical disk herniation, generally

4

present bilateral extremity symptoms. Five types of spinal cord lesions in patients with CCM

5

were proposed by Crandall et al.1 The classification is widely accepted and used because it

6

effectively describes neurological symptoms based on neuroanatomy. The most frequently

7

encountered Crandall classification is transverse syndrome, which generally presents bilateral

8

symptoms. Brown-Sequard syndrome is a unilateral cord lesion with ipsilateral motor deficit

9

and contralateral analgesia below the lesion.2 However, a substantial portion of patients with

SC

RI PT

1

CCM exhibit laterality of neurological symptoms without showing contralateral analgesia

11

below the lesion. Few studies regarding laterality of neurological symptoms in patients with

12

CCM have been reported.3

13

It is difficult to quantify spinal cord dysfunction by conventional magnetic resonance imaging

14

(MRI). However, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microstructural changes in the

15

white matter of the spinal cord and provide quantitative diffusion parameters. Fractional

16

anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) are derived from the diffusion matrix and

17

represent the degree of anisotropy and magnitude of the diffusion process. FA and MD reflect

18

tissue integrity in the spinal cord of patients with CCM. This hypothesis is supported by

19

several studies.4, 5 Maki et al. have reported that FA in lateral and posterior columns in

20

tract-specific DTI correlated with gait disturbance in patients with CCM.6

21

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between intrinsic structural damage and

22

laterality of symptoms using spinal cord diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the corticospinal

23

tract.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

10

24 25

Materials and Methods 3

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Participants

2

All participants provided written, informed consent before participating in the research,

3

which was previously approved by our institutional review board. We enrolled 10 healthy

4

volunteers and 40 patients with CCM in this study. We excluded potential participants with a

5

history of neurological injury, spinal surgery, or neurodegenerative disease causing any spinal

6

cord disorder. Healthy volunteers included 6 men and 4 women with a mean age of 43.7 ± 8.6

7

years. In the group of patients with CCM, there were 26 men and 14 women with a mean age

8

of 65.3 ± 11.0 years. The clinical diagnoses included 18 patients with cervical spondylotic

9

myelopathy, 19 with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, 2 with cervical disk

SC

herniation, and 1 with atlantoaxial dislocation because of rheumatoid arthritis.

M AN U

10

RI PT

1

11 Clinical Evaluation

13

We evaluated motor function using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor

14

score for left and right upper and lower extremities. Left and right motor scores ranged from

15

0 to 50.7

16

TE D

12

Conventional MRI

18

The patients were studied using a 3.0 T MRI system (Discovery MR 750, GE Healthcare,

19

Waukesha, WI). An 8-ch head, neck, and spine receiver coil was used. Conventional MRI

20

consisted of T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) sagittal images, and T2W axial

21

images were also obtained. For sagittal imaging, the acquisition settings were as follows:

22

field-of-view (FOV) = 24 × 24 cm2, slice thickness = 3 mm echo time (TE)/time of repetition

23

(TR) = 8.4/500 ms (T1W) and TE/TR = 105/2710 ms (T2W). For axial imaging, the

24

acquisition settings were as follows: FOV = 16 × 16 cm2, slice thickness = 4 mm, TE/TR =

25

105/4000 ms.

AC C

EP

17

4

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Diffusion Tensor Imaging

3

For DTI acquisitions, diffusion-weighted spin-echo single-shot echo-planar imaging was

4

used, with diffusion gradients applied in 6 noncollinear spatial directions and 1 baseline

5

image with b = 700 s/mm2. Reduced FOV technique was applied to reduce susceptibility

6

artifacts and achieve higher resolution.8, 9 The thickness of each slice was 5 mm and the

7

sequence parameters for DTI were: TE = 74.9 ms, TR = 3000 ms, FOV = 14 × 4.2 cm2,

8

number of excitations = 16, and the acquisition data matrix = 176 × 54. Transverse images

9

covering the cervical spinal cord from C1 to T1 were acquired, each of which was placed at

SC

the center of either a vertebra or intervertebral disk.

M AN U

10

RI PT

2

11 Image Analysis

13

We identified the level of maximum compression on T2W axial images, and divided the

14

cross-sectional area (CSA) of the spinal cord into left and right halves using the line bisecting

15

the center of the spinous process and vertebra. We measured left and right CSAs using Image

16

J software, version 1.45 (NIH, Bethesda, MD) (Fig. 1).

17

We quantified diffusion tensor parameters using DTIStudio software (Johns Hopkins Medical

18

Institute, Johns Hopkins University). Five levels from C2/3 to C6/7 were measured in control

19

group. The level of maximum compression was measured in patients with CCM.

20

Regions-of-interest (ROI) for the lateral column (LC) tracts were determined based on the

21

geometry of the cord on the axial image of the FA map and FA and MD were measured (Fig.

22

2). The size of ROIs was standardized at 6-8 pixels. We analyzed the correlation between FA

23

and MD and left and right ASIA motor scores.

AC C

EP

TE D

12

24 25

Reliability of ROI Measurement for DTI Analysis 5

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

ROI measurements were made twice by 2 experienced spinal surgeons at 2-week intervals.

2

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the interobserver and

3

intraobserver reliabilities. We provide 95% prediction limits for the errors in measurements.

4 Statistical Analyses

6

A Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare means of FA and MD values and asymmetry

7

indices between patients with CCM and healthy controls. Correlations between DTI

8

parameters and left and right ASIA motor scores were determined using Spearman’s

9

correlation coefficients. The FA symmetry index for healthy volunteers and patients with

SC

RI PT

5

CCM was calculated. The FA asymmetry index is the percentage of the absolute difference

11

between the FA in the left and right ROIs relative to the sum of the respective FA (asymmetry

12

index = |FAright – FAleft|/(FAright + FAleft) × 100). The asymmetry indices for MD and CSA

13

values were also calculated. The prediction of asymmetrical symptoms using the FA, MD and

14

CSA asymmetry index was determined using the area under a receiver–operator characteristic

15

(ROC) curve. P < 0.05 was considered significant. All the analyses were conducted using

16

JMP software, version 10.0.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

17

EP

TE D

M AN U

10

Results

19

Clinical Symptoms

20

The ASIA motor score for the left side was 47.6 (range 36–50) and for the right side was 47.7

21

(range 38–50). The difference between the left and right ASIA scores was 0.1 ± 2.3. Because

22

the asymmetry of symptoms between left and right was more than 2 standard deviations

23

(SDs) (i.e. more than 4 points difference in left and right ASIA motor score), 4 of 40 (10%)

24

patients had laterality of neurological symptoms. None of these patients presented

25

Brown-Sequard syndrome, and were considered to have transverse syndrome.

AC C

18

6

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 FA, MD and asymmetry indices

3

DTI analyses revealed that the FA in patients with CCM was significantly lower than that in

4

healthy volunteers in both left and right LC (Table 1). The MD in patients with CCM was

5

significantly higher than that in healthy volunteers in both left and right LC (Table 1). The FA

6

and MD asymmetry indices in patients with CCM were significantly higher than those in

7

healthy volunteers (Table 2).

8 9

Correlation between ASIA Score and DTI Indices

SC

RI PT

2

In patients with CCM, left and right ASIA scores correlated moderately with FA in the left

11

and right LCs (left: ρ = 0.64, P < 0.001; right: ρ = 0.67, P < 0.001; Fig. 3). However, left and

12

right ASIA scores were not correlated with MD in the right or left LC respectively (left: ρ =

13

-0.13, P = 0.43; right: ρ = -0.26, P = 0.10; Fig. 3).

M AN U

10

TE D

14

Reliability of ROI Measurement for DTI Analysis

16

The ICC for interobserver reliability of ROI measurements was 0.87 for the FA value and

17

0.76 for the MD value. The ICC for intraobserver reliability of ROI measurements was 0.90

18

for the FA value and 0.93 for the MD value. The inter- and intraobserver reliability of tract

19

specific ROI measurements was considered reliable for analyzing DTI of the patients with

20

CCM.

AC C

21

EP

15

22

Cross-sectional Area (CSA) of the Spinal Cord

23

The mean left and right CSAs of the spinal cord in patients with CCM were 25.4 ± 8.2 mm2

24

and 26.6 ± 7.9 mm2 respectively at the most apparent level of cord compression. The left

25

CSAs showed only a weak correlation with left ASIA motor scores and right CSAs showed 7

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

no correlation with right ASIA motor scores (left: ρ = 0.39, P = 0.01; right: ρ = 0.28, P =

2

0.08; Fig.4). The asymmetry index for CSA was 11.6 ± 9.1%.

3 Detection of the Laterality of Neurological Symptoms

5

The area under the receiver–operator characteristic (ROC) curve for the FA asymmetry index

6

was 0.86, which indicated that the FA asymmetry index could moderately indicate the

7

laterality of neurological symptoms in the left and right extremities. On the other hand, the

8

area under the ROC curve for the MD and CSA asymmetry index were 0.57 and 0.54,

9

respectively, which indicated that both MD and CSA asymmetry index had low accuracy for

SC

detecting the laterality of neurological symptoms of left and right extremities.

M AN U

10

RI PT

4

11 DISCUSSION

13

The present study shows that it is feasible to demonstrate correlation between left and right

14

microstructural damages in spinal cord and corresponding spinal cord long tract symptoms

15

independently and to reveal asymmetry of neurological symptoms in patients with CCM

16

using tract-specific DTI. A certain portion of patients with CCM exhibited asymmetrical

17

symptoms in their upper and lower extremities.

18

Tract-specific analysis of the spinal cord is gaining popularity because high resolution images

19

can be acquired by reduced FOV techniques.8, 9 However, most studies of DTI for evaluating

20

the spinal cord at the tract level target demyelinating disease in patients whose spinal cord

21

morphology is preserved. There are few DTI studies evaluating patients with CCM at the

22

tract level.6,10–13 Even fewer DTI studies focus on laterality of the neurological symptoms in

23

patients with demyelinating disease and CCM. Meyenburg et al. reported that DTI revealed

24

asymmetrical changes in the spinal cord of patients with multiple sclerosis, which

25

corresponded to asymmetrical electrophysiological deficits for both arms and legs, and

AC C

EP

TE D

12

8

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

reflected a specific structure–function relationship in the spinal cord.14 Yoo et al. analyzed 9

2

patients with CCM using DTI and sorted DTI parameters into affected and unaffected sides

3

according to the presence or the absence of symptoms. They found a significant decrease in

4

FA of anterior and lateral ROIs in the affected side compared with a control group. However,

5

their patient population was relatively small and the definition of affected and unaffected side

6

was not well described.15 Cui et al. conducted column specific analysis of the spinal cord in

7

patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. In their report, they presented a patient with

8

left hand clumsiness and spasticity of the left lower limb showing low FA in DTI of the

9

lateral and posterior column on the left side of the spinal cord as a representative case.10 The

10

present study focused on laterality of symptoms in patients with CCM and revealed left and

11

right decreases in FA in the LCs corresponding to left and right limb motor dysfunction (Fig.

12

5). By contrast, spinal cord CSA was not correlated with ASIA motor score. Correlation

13

between CSA and clinical symptoms of CCM remains uncertain and it seems difficult to

14

predict the severity of the symptoms using CSA.16 Kadanka et al. reported that there was a

15

significant difference in the modified JOA score of patients with cervical spondylotic

16

myelopathy between those with CSA <50 mm2 and those with CSA >60 mm2.17 Golash et al.

17

demonstrated that narrowness of the spinal cord CSA was well correlated with severity of

18

established myelopathy, but was an unsatisfactory prognosticator for mild degrees of

19

myelopathy.18

20

In the present study, 10% of the patients with CCM exhibited asymmetrical symptoms in

21

their extremities. There are few studies referring to laterality of neurological symptoms in

22

patients with CCM. Mihara et al. found that 12% of patients with CCM had laterality of

23

symptoms in their extremities, which was defined as 4 times or more difference in a left and

24

right limb performance test (a finger grip and release test and a triangle step test).19 They

25

compared surgical outcomes between patients with cervical myelopathy who had either

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

9

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT symmetrical or asymmetrical symptoms.3 JOA score recovery rates in patients with

2

asymmetrical symptoms were less than those of patients with mild symmetrical symptoms,

3

but were greater than those of patients with severe symmetrical symptoms. The investigators

4

hypothesized that cervical myelopathy might progress through a period of asymmetrical

5

symptoms before producing severe symmetrical symptoms. However, in the present study, we

6

identified patients with relatively severe impairment as having asymmetrical symptoms. The

7

difference can be attributed to the definition of asymmetrical symptoms, which were defined

8

by more than two SDs difference in ASIA motor score in the current study, and not by a

9

performance test. Because 4 points loss in ASIA motor score represents substantial motor

10

weakness, patients with asymmetrical symptoms present poor functional status. Previous

11

neurohistopathological studies of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy showed that

12

the distribution of the lesion in the spinal cord was not homogeneous, which supports the

13

hypothesis that degeneration of the LC can occur asymmetrically.20 A proportion of our

14

patients presented asymmetrical symptoms in their extremities even though they were

15

classified as having a transverse syndrome, but not Brown-Sequard syndrome.

16

Decrease in FA and increase in MD at the compression site were seen in patients with CCM

17

compared with healthy volunteers, which was consistent with previous studies.21–24 Decrease

18

in FA is considered to reflect demyelination and axon damage in the spinal cord. 23-26 The

19

current study showed a moderate correlation between decrease in FA and left and right ASIA

20

motor score. The LC contains the lateral corticospinal tract, which is the principal descending

21

motor fiber tract conducting voluntary movement in the human spinal cord. Therefore,

22

damage in the LC, which is reflected by a decrease in FA, is considered to result in decreased

23

ASIA motor score. By contrast, the present study showed no correlation between MD and

24

ASIA motor score, which is consistent with previous findings.11, 21 Increase in MD is

25

considered to occur at the initial stage of CCM, and is possibly related to edema.15 MD may

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

1

10

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

be useful to indicate the presence of myelopathy, but has difficultly predicting the severity of

2

myelopathy.4, 27 Budzik et al. reported that assessment using FA is more useful than MD

3

because of the higher sensitivity of FA for identifying microstructural changes compared with

4

MD.11 Thus, analysis of FA using tract-specific DTI enables a better understanding of the

5

pathology of CCM in the transverse plane of the spinal cord.

6

There are severallimitations to the present study. First, the age of the healthy volunteers and

7

patients with CCM does not match perfectly. FA in the cervical spinal cord decreases with

8

age.28, 29 Although this may contribute to the higher FA seen in the spinal cord of healthy

9

volunteers, it is the asymmetry of the FA that is important in this study. Second, the results of

SC

RI PT

1

the study do not provide guidance on how patients with decreased FA or with asymmetrical

11

symptoms respond to following surgical intervention. This is beyond the scope of our

12

investigation, yet a study is currently underway to determine the association between DTI

13

parameters and functional outcomes after surgery. Third, because automatic selection of tracts

14

in compressed spinal cord is not available, we had to prescribe the ROI manually. In patients

15

with severely compressed spinal cords, there was a possibility of poor reproducibility of ROI

16

placement even though we showed relatively high reliability and reproducibility using ICC

17

analyses. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, this is the first report showing correlations between

18

left and right FA of specific spinal cord tracts and severity of motor dysfunction in left and

19

right extremities of patients with CCM.

TE D

EP

AC C

20

M AN U

10

21

Conclusions

22

Using tract-specific DTI, we demonstrated that microstructural changes in the left and right

23

corticospinal tracts correlated with corresponding neurological symptoms in the ipsilateral

24

side and the FA asymmetry index could indicate laterality in neurological symptoms of

25

patients with CCM. Thus, tract-specific DTI can be used to assess pathological changes in the 11

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

axial plane of the spinal cord in a quantitative manner and enable a better understanding of

2

the relationship between deterioration of the tracts of the spinal cord and the symptoms of

3

CCM.

4 Acknowledgment

6

Funding: This work was supported by Initiative for Accelerating Regulatory Science in

7

Innovative Drug, Medical Device, and Regenerative Medicine the Ministry of Health, Labour

8

and Welfare; National Mutual Insurance Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives; and The

9

General Insurance Association of Japan grant funds.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

5

12

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References

1. Crandall PH, Batzdorf U: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 1966;25:57-66. 2. Brown-Sequard CE. De la transmission des impressions sensitives par la moelle epiniere. CR Soc Biol 192-194, 1849.

RI PT

3. Mihara H, Kondo S, Katoh S, Ishida K, Ono M, Hachiya M: Neurological laterality and surgical outcome in cervical myelopathy patients. J Spine Res 2:1454-1460, 2011.

4. Demir A, Ries M, Moonen CTW, Vital JM, Dehais J, Arne P, Caillé J-M, Dousset V:

SC

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy1. Radiology 229:37-43, 2003.

M AN U

5. Hori M, Okubo T, Aoki S, Kumagai H, Araki T: Line scan diffusion tensor MRI at low magnetic field strength: feasibility study of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in an early clinical stage. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:183-188, 2006.

6. Maki S, Koda M, Ota M, Oikawa Y, Kamiya K, Inada T, Furuya T, Takahashi K, Masuda Y,

TE D

Matsumoto K, Kojima M, Obata T, Yamazaki M: Reduced field-of-view diffusion tensor imaging of the spinal cord shows motor dysfunction of the lower extremities in patients with cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) August 2015 [Epub ahead of pront].

EP

7. Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G, Ditunno JF, Donovan WH, Ducker TB, Garber SL,

AC C

Marino RJ, Stover SL, Tator CH, Waters RL, Wilberger JE, Young W: International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal cord Off J Int Med Soc Paraplegia 35:266-274, 1997. 8. Saritas EU, Cunningham CH, Lee JH, Han ET, Nishimura DG: DWI of the spinal cord with reduced FOV single-shot EPI. Magn Reson Med 60:468-473, 2008. 9. Saritas EU, Lee D, Çukur T, Shankaranarayanan A, Nishimura DG: Hadamard slice encoding for reduced-FOV diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 72:1277-90, 2014. 10. Cui JL, Li X, Chan TY, Mak KC, Luk KDK, Hu Y: Quantitative assessment of 13

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

column-specific degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on diffusion tensor tractography. Eur Spine J 24:41-47, 2015. 11. Budzik JF, Balbi V, Le Thuc V, Duhamel A, Assaker R, Cotten A: Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Radiol 21:426-433, 2011.

RI PT

12. Wen CY, Cui JL, Mak KC, Luk KDK, Hu Y: Diffusion tensor imaging of somatosensory tract in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its link with electrophysiological evaluation. Spine J 14:1493-1500, 2014.

SC

13. Wang KY, Idowu O, Thompson CB, Orman G, Myers C, Riley LH, Carrino JA, Flammang A, Gilson W, Sadowsky CL, Izbudak I: Tract-specific diffusion tensor imaging in cervical

M AN U

spondylotic myelopathy before and after decompressive spinal surgery: preliminary results. Clin Neuroradiol June 2015 [Epub ahead of pront].

14. Von Meyenburg J, Wilm BJ, Weck A, Petersen J, Gallus E, Mathys J, Schaetzle E, Schubert M, Boesiger P, von Meyenburg K, Goebels N, Kollias S: Spinal cord diffusion-tensor

TE D

Imaging and motor-evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients: microstructural and functional asymmetry. Radiology 267:869-879, 2013. 15. Yoo WK, Kim TH, Hai DM, Sundaram S, Yang YM, Park MS, Kim YC, Kwak YH, Ohn

EP

SH, Kim SW: Correlation of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and clinical findings

AC C

of cervical myelopathy. Spine J 13:867-876, 2013. 16. Nouri A, Martin AR, Mikulis D, Fehlings MG: Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a review of structural changes and measurement techniques. Neurosurg Focus 40:E5, 2016. 17. Kadanka Z, Kerkovsky M, Bednarik J, Jarkovsky J: Cross-sectional transverse area and hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging in relation to the clinical picture in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2573-2577, 2007. 18. Golash D, Birchall RD, Laitt A: Significance of CSF area measurements in cervical 14

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT spondylitic myelopathy. Br J Neurosurg 15:17-21, 2001.

19. Mihara H, Kondo S, Murata A, Ishida K, Niimura T, Hachiya M: A New Performance Test for Cervical Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:32-35, 2010. 20. Ito T, Oyanagi K, Takahashi H, Takahashi HE, Ikuta F: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

RI PT

Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:827-833, 1996. 21. Ellingson BM, Salamon N, Grinstead JW, Holly LT: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)

SC

predicts functional impairment in mild to moderate cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 14:2589-97, 2014.

M AN U

22. Jones JG, Chen SY, Lebel RM, Hsieh PC, Law M: Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with the clinical assessment of disease severity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and predicts outcome following surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:471-478, 2013. 23. Vedantam A, Jirjis MB, Schmit BD, Wang MC, Ulmer JL, Kurpad SN: Diffusion tensor

TE D

imaging of the spinal cord: insights from animal and human studies. Neurosurgery 74:1-8, 2014.

24. Martin AR, Aleksanderek I, Cohen-Adad J, Tarmohamed Z, Tetreault L, Smith N, Cadotte

EP

DW, Crawley A, Ginsberg H, Mikulis DJ, Fehlings MG: Translating state-of-the-art spinal

AC C

cord MRI techniques to clinical use: A systematic review of clinical studies utilizing DTI, MT, MWF, MRS, and fMRI. NeuroImage Clin 10:192-238, 2016. 25. Budde MD, Kim JH, Liang H-F, Schmidt RE, Russell JH, Cross AH, Song S-K: Toward accurate diagnosis of white matter pathology using diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 57:688-695, 2007. 26. DeBoy CA, Zhang J, Dike S, Shats I, Jones M, Reich DS, Mori S, Nguyen T, Rothstein B, Miller RH, Griffin JT, Kerr DA, Calabresi PA: High resolution diffusion tensor imaging of axonal damage in focal inflammatory and demyelinating lesions in rat spinal cord. Brain 15

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 130:2199-2210, 2007.

27. Uda T, Takami T, Tsuyuguchi N, Sakamoto S, Yamagata T, Ikeda H, Nagata T, Ohata K: Assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging parameter at 3.0 tesla. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:407-414, 2013.

RI PT

28. Vedantam A, Jirjis MB, Schmit BD, Wang MC, Ulmer JL, Kurpad SN: Characterization and limitations of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in the cervical spinal cord in neurologically intact subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:861-867, 2013.

SC

29. Agosta F, Laganà M, Valsasina P, Sala S, Dall’Occhio L, Sormani MP, Judica E, Filippi M:

EP

AC C

Figure captions

TE D

Neuroimage 36:728-735, 2007.

M AN U

Evidence for cervical cord tissue disorganisation with aging by diffusion tensor MRI.

Figure 1. Measurement of the left and right cross-sectional area (CSA) of the spinal cord using Image J software, version 1.45 (NIH, Bethesda, MD) The CSA was manually demarcated and divided into left and right halves by the line bisecting the center of the spinous process and vertebra.

Figure 2. Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps of (a) a healthy volunteer and (b) a patient with cervical compression myelopathy (CCM). In the patients with CCM, regions-of-interest 16

Maki

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(ROIs) were defined on axial images of the FA map at the level of maximum compression. ROIs were placed in the lateral columns (white circles).

Figure 3. Spearman’s correlation between American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor

RI PT

score and fractional anisotropy (FA). Left and right ASIA score correlated moderately with FA of the left and right lateral column (LC) respectively. ASIA motor score was not

SC

correlated with mean diffusivity (MD) of the LC of the spinal cord.

Figure 4. Spearman’s correlation between American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor

M AN U

score and cross-sectional area (CSA) of spinal cord. The left CSA showed only a weak correlation with left ASIA motor score and the right CSA was not correlated with right ASIA motor score.

TE D

Figure 5. A 73-year-old woman with severe myelopathy (Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score; 10 points) because of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Her American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor scores were 48 on the left and 41 on the right.

EP

A: T2-weighted sagittal image.

AC C

B: T2-weighted axial image at the level of maximum compression (C4-5). C: Fractional anisotropy (FA) map at the level of maximum compression. FA in the lateral column was 0.45 on the left and 0.29 on the right.

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. The mean FA and MD values in CCM patients and healthy volunteer

FA in right LC MD in left LC MD in right LC

Healthy volunteers

0.56

0.71

(range 0.32–0.76)

(range 0.62–0.77)

0.55

0.71

(range 0.29–0.75)

(range 0.61–0.78)

1.6×10-3

1.1×10-3

(range 1.0–2.4×10-3)

(range 0.82–1.5×10-3)

1.6×10-3

1.1×10-3

(range 0.75–1.4×10-3)

M AN U

(range 1.0–2.7×10-3)

P <0.001

RI PT

FA in left LC

CCM patients

SC

DTI parameters

<0.001 <0.001 <0.001

DTI: diffusion tensor imaging, CCM: cervical compression myelopathy, FA: fractional

AC C

EP

TE D

anisotropy, LC: lateral column, MD: mean diffusivity.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. The mean FA and MD asymmetry indices in CCM patients and healthy volunteer

CCM patients

Healthy volunteers

P

FA asymmetry index

5.0 ± 4.9%

0.8 ± 0.5%

<0.001

MD asymmetry index

6.3 ± 5.7%

1.7 ± 1.4%

RI PT

Asymmetry index

0.004

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

CCM: cervical compression myelopathy, FA: fractional anisotropy, MD: mean diffusivity.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Fractional anisotropy correlated with left and right symptoms independently.



Fractional anisotropy asymmetry index could indicate laterality in symptoms. Ten percent of the patients exhibited laterality of symptoms in their extremities.

SC M AN U TE D EP AC C



RI PT



ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Abbreviations: CCM: cervical compression myelopathy DTI: diffusion tensor imaging

RI PT

FA: fractional anisotropy ASIA: American Spinal Injury Association ROI: region of interest LC: lateral column

SC

MD: mean diffusivity CSA: cross sectional area

T2W: T2-weighted, FOV: field of view, TE: echo time TR: time of repetition

TE D

ICC: intraclass correlation coefficients

M AN U

T1W: T1-weighted,

AC C

EP

ROC: receiver operator characteristic

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Conflict of interest

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper