Transport behaviour at high densities

Transport behaviour at high densities

Transpn Res. Vol. 7, pp. 421-425. Pergamon Press 1973. SHORT TRANSPORT Printed in Great Britain COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOUR AT HIGH DENSITIES S. E...

222KB Sizes 0 Downloads 145 Views

Transpn Res. Vol. 7, pp. 421-425.

Pergamon Press 1973.

SHORT TRANSPORT

Printed in Great Britain

COMMUNICATION

BEHAVIOUR

AT HIGH

DENSITIES

S. EL-HOSAINI Department of Civil Engineering, The City University, London, England (Received

15 January 1973)

INTRODUCTION MOST OF traffic behaviour theories were based on the statistical studies. Greenshields (1934) verified his theory statistically with the available data. Lighthill and Whitham (1955) based their theory on the application of fluid dynamics principles to various highway occurrences instead of using the statistical approach. Greenberg (1958) based his theory on the fluid dynamics analogy with satisfactory mathematical and statistical approaches and developed his study to obtain functional relations for the basis interactions between vehicles. At very high density, he found that the slope of the speed-density curve was decreasing gradually as traffic was approaching the jam density. This conclusion was not based on data below 7 m.p.h. Data was collected for this purpose at Edge Lane, Liverpool (1966) to cover the range below 7 m.p.h. A new traffic model based on the compressible gas dynamics was also developed. The model fitted the collected data satisfactorily and new results were obtained. THE

MODEL

Traffic was assumed to behave like a compressible gas under piston of gas dynamics may then be used for the high densities of traffic. The equations of gas dynamics used in this study are: (i) Equation

extracted

from the general p Y - *P Y--l

where

action.

The methods

energy equation + 8 22 = constant

P = pressure of gas P

=

Y

=

U

=

density of gas ratio between the specific volume under specific heat velocity of gas.

heat

(ii) Piston action

where c

= the sonic speed of the piston. 421

under

constant

pressure

and

the constant

Short

422

(iii) Adiabatic

communication

change for an ideal gas dP yP =-_ + P

Differentiate

(i) with respect to p and substitute du -=--. dp

For traffic use density k to replace density dv

(ii) and (iii) to get c2 PU

p and speed u to replace velocity --

dk =

c2 (1)

kv’

This is the basic equation to describe the behaviour density dependence of traffic speed. Speed-density-flow

u

of traffic. It has been solved to yield the

relationships

Equation (1) was solved to get the following three relationships: (i) By integration equation (1) and substitution of the boundary condition k = k, when v = 0

where c kj

of

= constant = the jam density

(ii) By substitution

of kh = kjhj = 5280 into equation h = hj . e(U*M2~2)

where h = headway (iii) By substitution

between

(2) (3)

vehicles

of 4 = kv into equation

(2) (4)

The normalized

flow and density: k

Assume a =kj and

Figure 1 shows the relationship between a and /3. This illustrates the traffic behaviour from k = 0 to k = k, where the maximum flow, qmax exists at a = 0.605. For qmax, dfllda = 0. Then, a = fl = em* kj = e*.k, q, = v,k, = e-*.v,ki where qm = VO = k, = Also q,,, =

qmax, 27at qmax k at qmax. ef .kjc, and c =

v,.

(5) (6)

423

Short communication

0

0

FIG. I. Theoretical

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.6

0.9

diagram of the normalized flow vs the normalized

This shows that c can be obtained a particular roadway. Different

0.2

if the optimum

speed, u, is known.

I.0

density.

c must be obtained

for

forms of the model:

v

=c

EXPERIMENTAL

(I

+2ln:)+

WORK

AND

DISCUSSION

An extensive volume-speed-density data of congested traffic were recorded using a purpose built automatic data collector (1966) and the Edge Lane data provided a basis for testing the model. In an attempt to fit the new model to this data, a semi-logarithmic graph was drawn between v2 and log,k as shown in Fig. 2. The model’s formula gave a coefficient of linear correlation, I = 0.98 as a “best-fit”. The relationship obtained was written in the following form v=c

(

2log.x

k, +

1

where c = 13.32 m.p.h. and k, = 150 v.p.m. This reveals that most drivers at very high densities, below 7 m.p.h., behave differently from Greenberg’s model, and individual drivers tend to decrease their speed with an increasing gradient to the (u-k) curve. Figure 3 shows the previous models of Greenberg and Greenshields together with the new model. While gradient stays constant in Greenshields’ model and decreases in Greenberg’s

Short communication

424 160

I

I

II

I

v2 =1774-355 160

II Lnk

R= 0.98 k, = 150

vpm mph

c = 1332

140

120

100

80 0 60 b 40

c

20

I

0

30

I

I

I

40 50

Density

"'i 200

k.

I

I

*

100

II

300 400 500

wm

FIG. 2. Statistical fitting of the model’s formula to the observed data.

30

I

I

I

I

-.-.--20

I

Greenshields model Greenberg model The new model

-

Density

FIG. 3. Fundamental

k,

wm

diagrams for the previous models and the new model.

Short communication

425

model, it increases in the new model as the density increases. Also, the rate of change of gradient (r.c.g.) between k = 120 and 140 v.p.m. was found -0*00125 in Greenberg’s model, while it is +0.017 in the new model. In a comparison between the basic equation of the new model dv/dk = -(?/kv), and the basic equation of Greenberg’s model dv/dk = -(c/k) or dvldk = -(cv/kv), it is found that the two basic equations are the same at one point only when v = c. The new model fitted satisfactorily the data collected at high densities for this purpose at Liverpool as shown in Fig. 3. This proved that the slope to the (v-k) curve increases gradually as the density approaches the jam density, particularly when speed falls under 7 m.p.h. Acknowledgement-The author wishes to acknowledge with thanks theassistanceandcooperation J. A. Proudlove for some of the concepts discussed in this paper.

of Professor

REFERENCES EL-HOSAINI, S. (1966). Measurements on congested traffic flows and theories of congestion. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool. GREENBERG,H. (1958). An analysis of traffic flow. Ops. Res. 7, 79-85. GREENSHIELDS, B. D. (1934). A study of traffic capacity. H. R. B. Proc. 14, 448477. LIGHTHILL,M. J. and WHITHAM,G. B. (1955). On kinematic waves II: A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc. R. Sot. 229, 317-345.