Transport properties of halogenated amorphous silicon

Transport properties of halogenated amorphous silicon

301 Materials Chemistry and Physics, 9 (1983) 301-305 TRANSPORT PROPERTIES V.AUGELLI and R.MURRI Dipartimento Universita OF HALOGENATED di Fis...

295KB Sizes 2 Downloads 83 Views

301

Materials Chemistry and Physics, 9 (1983) 301-305

TRANSPORT

PROPERTIES

V.AUGELLI

and R.MURRI

Dipartimento Universita

OF HALOGENATED

di Fisica and Gruppo di Bari, Via Amendola

AMORPHOUS

Nazionale

SILICON

di Struttura

della Materia,

173, 70126 Bari (Italy)

ABSTRACT Electrical silicon

and photoelectronic

films have been studied

The dark conductivity deposition

properties

of halogenated

as a function

of several

and the photoconductivity

and

hydrogenated

deposition

are strongly

parameters.

dependent

onthese

parameters.

From these trends,

hypotheses

on the structural

model of the film are made.

INTRODUCTION The growing to two reasons. material

interest

The first is that amorphous

for solar energy

ting technological reason

in the study of amorphous

conversion

applications

latively

high semiconductor

bility of doping tes dangling

the physics quality

lowering

the density

cause of this, much attention red by dissociation

of silane.

pacitively silicon

coupled

Moreover,

0254_0584/83/US $3.00

an

due

inexpensive

C21

. The second

gives us the opportunity

that hydrogen

amorphous

to go dee-

semiconductors.

silicon

of states

properties

mixtures

glow-discharge

tetrachloride

etc.)

incorporation

silicon

silicon

C5,61. Our samples

possisatura-

E41.

Be-

films

prena-

films which

were

were deposited

by using as starting

The re-

is due to the

in the pseudo-gap

has been paid to amorphous

also stable and had good electrical SiF4 or Sic14 and hydrogen

represents

of amorphous

of amorphous

~31 and to the discovery

bonds,

is essentially

Lll, as well as for other interes-

(transistor, xerography,

is that the study of its properties

per in to the understandingof

silicon

devices

silicon

from

starting

were deposited material

in a ca-

a mixture

of

and hydrogen,

0 Elsevier Sequoia/P~nted

in The Netherlands

302 Experimental

details

about the deposition

In this paper we will discuss tivity of a-Si:H:Cl

the dependence

films on some deposition

rature of the film, Td; the discharge fined as the percentage gap state distribution

apparatus

can be found in ref.C71.

of the dark- and the photo-conducparameters:

pressure,

the deposition

p, and the feeding

of Sic14 in the total flow, Finally

tempe-

ratio R, de-

some remarks on the

will be made.

EXPERIMENTAL Films of halogenated -discharge thickness equipped

of silicon

Four contacts

measurements.

Photo-conductivity

was measured

using ~nochromatic

by using a constant recorded

current

film

on sapphire,

were

were used for re-

light

the applied

photon flux was 101s-1014

. The

on the outer surface.

chopped

with a lock-in amplifier;

171

for photo-conductivity

In both cases, they are coplanar

Current Source and the voltage Keithley

The films deposited

in the van der Pauw configuration

5x10* V/cm and the incident

by r-f. glow -

and hydrogen

1.5 mm apart,

contacts,

was measured

The current was measured

ductivity

silicon were prepared

tetrachloride

ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 microns. with two Al sputtered

measurements. sistivity

and hydrogenated

from a mixture

20 Hz).

=

field was about

photons/s.

supplied

(V

The dark

con-

by a Keithley

by an high input impedance

225

(>1012 ohm)

616 electrometer.

RESULTS In

this paper we present

phous silicon

deposited

some experimental

under different

infer a trend for the dependence rameters.

A more systematic

paper. First,

a set of samples ture Td ranging

deposited between

of the measured

investigation

let us consider

p=2 torr; Td=320

as a function

of

tempera-

the room temperature

conduc-

of Td. As one can see, d RT increases practically

constant.

of 0 RT on R is displayedby

Figs.lb

The conductivity

with R. In Fig.lb the experimental

at W=70 W; Td=320 OC; R=3%; while

p varies

samples

and lc

increases

points refer to from 0.7 to 4.5

deposited

at W=70 W;

"C and R=3 to 15%.

The same qualitative are reported

pa-

on Td of the dark conductivity

of o RT on p and R, respectively.

torr. The dependence

to

on the discharge

at p-2 torr; R=3%; W=7OW and at deposition

it diminishes

samples deposited

films ofamorallow us

will be the object of a forthcoming

the dependence

rapidly up Td ~300 "C and then it remains

with p whilst

Such results

quantity

175 and 430 "C. In Fig.la,

tivity u RT, is reported

show the behaviour

results concerning

conditions.

behaviour

the experimental

is shown by the photoconductivity.

points of the photo-conductivity*

tion of Td, p and R. As one can see, o ph increases and then it is practically

constant

(Fig.2a).

CT

In

Fig.2

as a func-

ph rapidly up to Td 2300 "C

a ph increases

with pressure

in

303

0

1

2

3

4

Pftorr)

Fig.1

Room temperature

perature

conductivity

(6) discharge

, Td;

as a function

pressure,

of:

(a) depositiontem-

p and (c) feeding

ratio, R.

b m 5

0

/

=

0)

0

/

0 \ \

4 9

\

& ?0-2

./

I’

!

0-

0

/

/

\

I 2

1

I 3

I 4

Pltorrl

1 -

I I

-I

IO

i I

150 Fig.2

Photo-conductivity

(b) discharge

pressure,

4, as a function

shown by oph &

R (Fig.2c)

the range 3 to 10% and little variation A more extensive films is reported

of:

p and (c) feeding

the range 0.8 to 3.0 torr with a maximum The behaviour

5

0

I

350

250

analysis

in ref.C81.

RI%1

(a) deposition

10

15

temperature,Td;

ratio R.

at p=3 torr and then decreases (FQ..2b). shows a quite clear

lowering

of

uph in

in the range 10 to 15%.

of the photo-conductive

properties

of a-Si:H:Cl

304

DISCUSSION

Though the experimental results reported here concern the dependence on the deposition parameters of the dark-and the photo-conductivity,we would like to point out some characteristicfeatures of the electronic transport in our a-Si: :H:Cl films. Measurements of the dark conductivity as a function of the temperature have clearly shown that three different temperature ranges exist in which od has a definite activation energy C91 . Approximately in the range 90 to250 k all samples show an activation energy of ud of about 0.01 eV. This seems a characteristic feature of all samples, independent of the deposition conditions.For higher temperature, up to about 550 K, the activation energy depends on the

de-

position conditions and takes values in the range 0.3 to 0.5 eV. Since theoptical gap of our undoped samples is about 2 eV ClOl, the previous activationenergies are associated to hopping transport processes. When the temperature is raised (550
the

films. Let us assume a two-phase structural model Clll, in which islands of

mi-

crocrystallinematerial are interconnectedby connective tissue, with high density of defects. Probably~, the volume occupied by the tissue diminishes, increasins Td and the conductivitv increases. The structural rearranaement is comoetitive with that related to the hvdroaen and chlorine contents in the filmnetwork, as Td increases. This could explain the practically constant behaviour of Ud for Td > 300 "C. As far as the dependence of od on R or p is concerned, it could be argued that both parameters contribute to a worsening of the film quality.

Ac-

tually, we found that ud decreases as R increases, but, at least in the investigated pressure range, we did not find a similar behaviour for Ud w

p. Now,

let

us discuss the photo-conductiveproperties of our a-Si:H:Cl films. As one cansee in Fig.2a, the photo-conductivityvs Td curve shows a step rise up to 300 'C. This behaviour confirms other experimental results C12, 131, and is determinedby the decrease of the recombination centre density and, as a consequence, by

the

increase of the recombination lifetime. After Td 2:300 "C, oph is practically constant. As far as the pressure dependence of aph is concerned, it must bepointed out that as increasing p, two mechanisms take place ClO, 141: the first concerns the increase of the hydrogen and chlorine content in the film network; the second concerns nucleation mechanisms producing a deterioration in the filmstruc ture. The last mechanism seems to become important for p > 2 torr. In the range 0.8 to 3.0 torr, oph increases, since the more important process is the compen sation of the dangling bonds due to hydrogen and chlorine. For greater pressure,

305

the

increasing

Fig.2c

density

of defects

shows the dependence

of (SiC14tH2).

Although

causes a lowering

of oph on the percentange

the experimental

280 < Td < 430 "C, we can equally pendent

less chemical

establish

and physical

ted out, an increasein

of Sic14

in the total flow

points refer to films deposited

at

a trend that dph is practicallyinde-

of Tdin that range. We found that samples

displayed

of the photoconductivity.

stability

deposited

at high flow(R>lO%)

[lo]. In any case, as alreadypoin

R gives rise to an increase

of defects

and then to a

mi-

nor photo-conductivity.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors wish to thank the researchesrs Chimica

dei Plasmi"

lo for typewriting to Finalizzato

of the "Centro

of C.N.R. of Bari for preparing the manuscript.

Chimica

This work was partially

Fine e Secondaria"

di Studio

the specimens

per

la

and R.M.Cannil

supportedby

"Proget-

of C.N.R.

REFERENCES

1

D.E.Carlson,

2

W.E.Spear,

Solar Energy Materials P.G. Le Comber,

2 (1980) 503

A.J.Snell

and R.A.Gibson,

Thin Solid Films,

-90

(1982) 359 3

W.E.Spear

4

A.J.Lewis,

and P.G.Le Comber, G.A.N.Connell,

Bonded Amorphous

Phil. Mag.33 (1976) 935 J.R.Pawlik and R.J.Temkin,

W.Paul,

Semiconductors

, ed by M.Brodsky,

inTetrahedrally

S.Kirkpatrick,

D.Weaire

(AIP, New York 1974) pp 27-32 5

A.Madan,

6

R.D.Plattner, W.W.Kruhler,

S.R.Ovshinsky

E.C. Photovoltaic W.Palz.

(Reidel,

and E.Benn,

Phil. Flag. -40 (1979) 259

B.Rauscher,

W.Stetter

Solar Energy Conferenze

and J.G.Grabmaier,

Proc. 2nd

ed. by R.Van Overstraeten

and

1979) pag.860

7

G.Bruno,

P.Capezzuto,

F.Cramarossa

and D'Agostino,

8

V.Augelli,

R.Murri

and N.Alba,

9

V.Augelli,

R.Murri

and L.Schiavulli,

10

V.Augelli,

R.Murri,

Thin Solid Films67 -

(1980)

103

gelisti

L.Schiavulli,

and G.Fortunato, and D.A.Anderson,

W.Paul

12

W.E.Spear

and P.G.Le Comber,

by J.Mort

and D.M.Pai

P.J.Zanzucchi,

14

E.C.Freeman

G.Bruno,

P.Capezzuto,

Solar Energy Materials,

F.Cramarossa,

F.Evan

C.R.Wronski

2 (1981) 229

in Photo-conductivity

(Elsevier,

and W.Paul,

Phys. 54 (1983) 248

Thin Solid Films -90 (1982)

Thin Solid Films, 86 (1981) 359

11

13

J.Appl.

and Related

Phenomena,

New York 1976)

and D.E.Carlson,

Phys. Rev. -20 B

J.Appl.PHys.

(1979) 716

-48 (1977) 5227

ed.