- Email: [email protected]
Trends and Factors in the Decision for Laparoscopic Surgery in the ACS-NSQIP
ASSOCIATION FOR ACADEMIC SURGERY AND SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY SURGEONS—ABSTRACTS
CLINICAL TRIALS/OUTCOMES 3: QUALITY OF CARE I 4.1. Disparities in Emergency General Surgery Treatment: Influence of Insurance Status. S. S. Satahoo,1 J. S. Davis,1 L. H. Blackbourne,1 C. I. Schulman1; 1University Of Miami Department Of Surgery, Miami, FL, USA 4.2. Relationship of Hospital Readmission and Mortality for Major Surgery. T. Shih,1 J. B. Dimick1; 1University Of Michigan - Department Of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.3. Reliability of Risk-Adjusted Outcomes and Prediction of Future Performance. R. W. Krell,1 D. O. Staiger,2 J. B. Dimick1; 1 University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Dartmouth College - Department Of Economics, Lebanon, NH, USA 4.4. Is More Always Better?: The Association Between Hospital Care Intensity and Surgical Outcomes. K. H. Sheetz,1 J. B. Dimick,1 A. A. Ghaferi1; 1University Of Michigan Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.5. Are Surgeons at a Disadvantage by the Use of HCAHPS Patient Satisfaction Scores?. S. Murray,1 R. K. Schmocker,1 X. Vang,1 L. Cherney Stafford,1 C. Lin,1 E. R. Winslow1; 1 University Of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 4.6. Natural Language Processing of Text Paging in the Surgical Work Setting. A. D. Smith,1,2,3 M. S. De Vos,1 D. S. Smink,2,3 L. L. Nguyen,1,3 S. W. Ashley2,3; 1Brigham And Women’s Hospital Division Of Vascular And Endovascular Surgery, Boston, MA, USA; 2Brigham And Women’s Hospital - Department Of Surgery, Boston, MA, USA; 3Center For Surgery And Public Health, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 4.7. A Novel Approach to Postoperative Wound Surveillance: Using Available Smartphone Technology to Improve Transitional Care. J. T. Wiseman,1 S. Fernandes-Taylor,1 T. L. Engelbert,1 R. S. Saunders,1 K. C. Kent1; 1University Of Wisconsin - Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research (WiSOR) Program; Department Of Surgery, Madison, WI, USA 4.8. Validation of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database: Concordance and Discordance with Patient-Level Institutional Data. J. M. Sutton,1 A. J. Hayes,1 G. C. Wilson,1 R. C. Quillin,1 K. Wima,1 I. M. Paquette,1 J. J. Sussman,1 S. A. Ahmad,1 S. A. Shah,1 D. E. Abbott1; 1University Of Cincinnati - Department Of Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA 4.9. A Longitudinal Analysis of Disparities in Mortality After High-Risk General Surgery. A. A. Gonzalez,1,2 J. D. Birkmeyer,1 J. B. Dimick,1 A. A. Ghaferi1; 1University Of Michigan - Center For Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2University Of Illinois At Chicago - Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA 4.10. How NSQIP And Traditional M&M Address The Full Gamut Of Surgical Quality Management. L. A. Gurien,1
497
J. De Villa,2 M. S. Nussbaum,1 J. J. Tepas1; 1University Of Florida College Of Medicine - Jacksonville - Surgery, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 2University Of Florida Health Jacksonville - Surgery, Jacksonville, FL, USA 4.11. Variability in Operations of Considerable Risk Offers a Novel Opportunity for Quality Improvement. S. A. Waits,1 S. Kapeles,1 D. Cron,1 K. Schmidt,1 C. Frost,1 D. Srinivasan,1 M. Terjimanian,1 J. Derck,1 M. J. Englesbe1; 1 University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.12. Readmission after Elective Major Surgery: Is it Preventable? G. C. Wilson,1 R. C. Quillin,1 J. M. Sutton,1 K. Wima,1 I. M. Paquette,1 D. E. Abbott,1 S. A. Shah1; 1University Of Cincinnati - Department Of Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA 4.13. Paraspinous Muscle as a Predictor of Surgical Outcome. A. A. Mazurek,1 L. D. Canvasser,1 D. C. Cron,1 M. N. Terjimanian,1 C. S. Lee,1 M. B. Alameddine,1 J. Claflin,1 E. D. Davis,1 T. M. Schumacher,1 S. C. Wang,1 M. J. Englesbe1; 1 University Of Michigan - Department Of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.14. Does the Number of People in the Operating Room Affect Surgical Outcomes? A. M. Hart,1 G. A. Vitiello,1 T. M. Hagopian,1 S. D. Perez,1 B. Pettitt,1 J. F. Sweeney1; 1Emory University School Of Medicine - Department Of Surgery, Atlanta, GA, USA 4.15. Opening Pandora’s Box: Understanding the Nature, Patterns, and 30-day Outcomes of Intraoperative Adverse Events. M. N. Mavros,1,2 G. C. Velmahos,1 A. Larentzakis,1 L. Naraghi,1 D. D. Yeh,1 P. J. Fagenholz,1 M. DeMoya,1 D. R. King,1 J. Lee,1 H. M. Kaafarani1; 1Massachusetts General Hospital - Division Of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, And Surgical Critical Care, Boston, MA, USA; 2MedStar Washington Hospital Center - Department Of Surgery, Washington, DC, USA 4.16. Trends and Factors in the Decision for Laparoscopic Surgery in the ACS-NSQIP. B. R. Englum,1 A. M. Ganapathi,1 P. J. Speicher,1 J. E. Scarborough1; 1Duke University Medical Center - Surgery, Durham, NC, USA 4.17. Variation in Ambulatory Surgery Utilization in Michigan. S. L. Cramm,1 L. Corona,1 A. Haddad,1 L. Kolar,1 D. Kozminski,1 A. Miller,1 R. Mualla,1 P. Underwood,1 K. H. Sheetz,1 D. A. Campbell,1 M. J. Englesbe1; 1University Of Michigan - Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.18. Measuring Postoperative Recovery: What are Clinically Meaningful Differences? I. Antonescu,1 S. Scott,2 N. Mayo,2 L. S. Feldman1; 1McGill University Health Centre - Division Of General Surgery, Montreal, QC - QUEBEC, Canada; 2McGill University Health Centre - Division Of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal, QC - QUEBEC, Canada 4.19. Readmission Index - a Nomogram Predicting Postoperative Readmission in General Surgery Patients. S. E. Tevis,1 K. C. Kent,1 G. D. Kennedy1; 1University Of Wisconsin - Department Of Surgery, Madison, WI, USA
CLINICAL TRIALS/OUTCOMES 3: QUALITY OF CARE I 4.1. Disparities in Emergency General Surgery Treatment: Influence of Insurance Status. S. S. Satahoo,1 J. S. Davis,1 L. H. Blackbourne,1 C. I. Schulman1; 1University Of Miami Department Of Surgery, Miami, FL, USA 4.2. Relationship of Hospital Readmission and Mortality for Major Surgery. T. Shih,1 J. B. Dimick1; 1University Of Michigan - Department Of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.3. Reliability of Risk-Adjusted Outcomes and Prediction of Future Performance. R. W. Krell,1 D. O. Staiger,2 J. B. Dimick1; 1 University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Dartmouth College - Department Of Economics, Lebanon, NH, USA 4.4. Is More Always Better?: The Association Between Hospital Care Intensity and Surgical Outcomes. K. H. Sheetz,1 J. B. Dimick,1 A. A. Ghaferi1; 1University Of Michigan Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.5. Are Surgeons at a Disadvantage by the Use of HCAHPS Patient Satisfaction Scores?. S. Murray,1 R. K. Schmocker,1 X. Vang,1 L. Cherney Stafford,1 C. Lin,1 E. R. Winslow1; 1 University Of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 4.6. Natural Language Processing of Text Paging in the Surgical Work Setting. A. D. Smith,1,2,3 M. S. De Vos,1 D. S. Smink,2,3 L. L. Nguyen,1,3 S. W. Ashley2,3; 1Brigham And Women’s Hospital Division Of Vascular And Endovascular Surgery, Boston, MA, USA; 2Brigham And Women’s Hospital - Department Of Surgery, Boston, MA, USA; 3Center For Surgery And Public Health, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 4.7. A Novel Approach to Postoperative Wound Surveillance: Using Available Smartphone Technology to Improve Transitional Care. J. T. Wiseman,1 S. Fernandes-Taylor,1 T. L. Engelbert,1 R. S. Saunders,1 K. C. Kent1; 1University Of Wisconsin - Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research (WiSOR) Program; Department Of Surgery, Madison, WI, USA 4.8. Validation of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database: Concordance and Discordance with Patient-Level Institutional Data. J. M. Sutton,1 A. J. Hayes,1 G. C. Wilson,1 R. C. Quillin,1 K. Wima,1 I. M. Paquette,1 J. J. Sussman,1 S. A. Ahmad,1 S. A. Shah,1 D. E. Abbott1; 1University Of Cincinnati - Department Of Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA 4.9. A Longitudinal Analysis of Disparities in Mortality After High-Risk General Surgery. A. A. Gonzalez,1,2 J. D. Birkmeyer,1 J. B. Dimick,1 A. A. Ghaferi1; 1University Of Michigan - Center For Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2University Of Illinois At Chicago - Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA 4.10. How NSQIP And Traditional M&M Address The Full Gamut Of Surgical Quality Management. L. A. Gurien,1
497
J. De Villa,2 M. S. Nussbaum,1 J. J. Tepas1; 1University Of Florida College Of Medicine - Jacksonville - Surgery, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 2University Of Florida Health Jacksonville - Surgery, Jacksonville, FL, USA 4.11. Variability in Operations of Considerable Risk Offers a Novel Opportunity for Quality Improvement. S. A. Waits,1 S. Kapeles,1 D. Cron,1 K. Schmidt,1 C. Frost,1 D. Srinivasan,1 M. Terjimanian,1 J. Derck,1 M. J. Englesbe1; 1 University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.12. Readmission after Elective Major Surgery: Is it Preventable? G. C. Wilson,1 R. C. Quillin,1 J. M. Sutton,1 K. Wima,1 I. M. Paquette,1 D. E. Abbott,1 S. A. Shah1; 1University Of Cincinnati - Department Of Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA 4.13. Paraspinous Muscle as a Predictor of Surgical Outcome. A. A. Mazurek,1 L. D. Canvasser,1 D. C. Cron,1 M. N. Terjimanian,1 C. S. Lee,1 M. B. Alameddine,1 J. Claflin,1 E. D. Davis,1 T. M. Schumacher,1 S. C. Wang,1 M. J. Englesbe1; 1 University Of Michigan - Department Of Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.14. Does the Number of People in the Operating Room Affect Surgical Outcomes? A. M. Hart,1 G. A. Vitiello,1 T. M. Hagopian,1 S. D. Perez,1 B. Pettitt,1 J. F. Sweeney1; 1Emory University School Of Medicine - Department Of Surgery, Atlanta, GA, USA 4.15. Opening Pandora’s Box: Understanding the Nature, Patterns, and 30-day Outcomes of Intraoperative Adverse Events. M. N. Mavros,1,2 G. C. Velmahos,1 A. Larentzakis,1 L. Naraghi,1 D. D. Yeh,1 P. J. Fagenholz,1 M. DeMoya,1 D. R. King,1 J. Lee,1 H. M. Kaafarani1; 1Massachusetts General Hospital - Division Of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, And Surgical Critical Care, Boston, MA, USA; 2MedStar Washington Hospital Center - Department Of Surgery, Washington, DC, USA 4.16. Trends and Factors in the Decision for Laparoscopic Surgery in the ACS-NSQIP. B. R. Englum,1 A. M. Ganapathi,1 P. J. Speicher,1 J. E. Scarborough1; 1Duke University Medical Center - Surgery, Durham, NC, USA 4.17. Variation in Ambulatory Surgery Utilization in Michigan. S. L. Cramm,1 L. Corona,1 A. Haddad,1 L. Kolar,1 D. Kozminski,1 A. Miller,1 R. Mualla,1 P. Underwood,1 K. H. Sheetz,1 D. A. Campbell,1 M. J. Englesbe1; 1University Of Michigan - Surgery, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 4.18. Measuring Postoperative Recovery: What are Clinically Meaningful Differences? I. Antonescu,1 S. Scott,2 N. Mayo,2 L. S. Feldman1; 1McGill University Health Centre - Division Of General Surgery, Montreal, QC - QUEBEC, Canada; 2McGill University Health Centre - Division Of Clinical Epidemiology, Montreal, QC - QUEBEC, Canada 4.19. Readmission Index - a Nomogram Predicting Postoperative Readmission in General Surgery Patients. S. E. Tevis,1 K. C. Kent,1 G. D. Kennedy1; 1University Of Wisconsin - Department Of Surgery, Madison, WI, USA