Trimethylsilyl enol ethers from bicyclic ketones and dimethylaminotrimethylsilane(I)

Trimethylsilyl enol ethers from bicyclic ketones and dimethylaminotrimethylsilane(I)

Tetrahedron Letters No. 40, ~~3553 - 359, 1974. Pergamon Press. Printed in (Seat Britain. TRIMNTHYLSILYL ENOL ETHERS PROM BICYCLIC KETONES AND DI...

102KB Sizes 0 Downloads 88 Views

Tetrahedron Letters No. 40, ~~3553

- 359,

1974.

Pergamon Press.

Printed in (Seat Britain.

TRIMNTHYLSILYL ENOL ETHERS PROM BICYCLIC KETONES AND DIMRTHYLAMINoTRIMEZHYISILANE(I)l

Lars H. Hell.berg* and Angel Juarez Department of Chemistry, San Diego State University San Diego, California 92115 (Received in USA 9 July 1974; receivedin UK for publication28 August 1974)

Since 19n

we have sought enemines of benzo[f]chromen&-one

k-one(II), despite publication

and, later (1972), of chromen-

(2a) and discussion (2b) regarding the failure (2~) to obtain the

pyrrolidine enamine of II by classical meens (3).

When a new procedure appeared (k), we tried

to prepare V from II with I, but the outcome wes different from the successm

synthesis Of

enendnes of monocyclic ketones (4,5). Reaction of I end II (4) (96O/96hrs) gave a 35% yield of a product:

nm m/e 220 (@),

lacking the nmr absorption expected at 6 2.5 (N-CH3) for V, known for VII (6). We assigned VIII CH3

73

\N of> 0

/ 0

eri IIP O \

4

0

cru,3

Si(CH3)3

\

\\_, x

X

v VI VII

x=-oX=-Sx=-C&o,Si(CH3)3

II III IV

_

ti VIII IX x

x=-ox = sx = -CH3M3,

73 N

0

\ 7 c_ ,I

i",0

09 XI

-

XII

6 0 XIII

3553

X x=-Ox= sx=-G+-

3554

No. 40

TABLE &vinyl

Product VIII IX XC XI XIII

BP'(~)

$ Yield (hrs) a

v(C=C-O-)(cm-I)

H

triplet(J)b

95-NO.8)

70 (72)

1638

4.80(3.5)

115-a(0.75)

92 (la)

1632

5.12(5.1)

PO-5(1.5)

al (122)

1633

5.04(4.0)

91-4(0.6)

66 (PO)

1628

5.35(6.5)

64-5(a)

75 (2)

164pd

4.30(4.0)

aConditions: room temperature for the hours indicated, with catalyst p-toluenesulfonic acid (5); all compounds exhibited a molecular ion (M+) in their mass spectra ana'gave satisfactory elemental analyses. bmI1-X exhibited G(Si-MS) 0.154.31; XIII 6(N-CH3) 2.55. CCited (no properties or spectra) in G. M. Rubottom and M. I. Lopez, & as the structure of the product.

a.

e.,

_, 36

2097 (1973).

'C=C-N:

.

When the generality of this reaction was examined using the

more recent conditions (5), all of the bicyclic ketones gave the corresponding silyl en01 ethers (VIII-XI) (TABLE).

Only the monocyclic, 4-oxa analog (XII) of cyclohexanone

gave an ensmine

(XIII). Ensmines of IV are formed sluggishly

(7) and its pyrrolidine enamine is slkylated in low

yield (7a) due to steric hindersnce at the carbonyl from the peri-H (e.g. 8-H in IV).

In this

study the peri-H presumably hinders one step of enamine formation between the nitrogen of I and the carbonyl carbon (To), allowing electrophilic give the enol ether.

attack by the silicon of I on the oqgen

(8) to

A similar change in reaction course with changing steric hinderance has

been observed in the reaction of ketones with dialkylaminostannsnes

(9).

References 1.

Some Reactions of Enamines. Part IV. Part III: and R. N. Wilke, %, Preps. &Procedures x.,

L. H. Hellberg, C. C. Adams, R. J. Elligan & 77 (1971).

2.

(a) F. M. Dean and K. B. Hindley, Tet. Letts., 1445 (1972); (b) Personal Correspondence, F. M. Dean, June-July, 1972; (c) Washed to obtain this ensmine (3), even with acid catalyst (3a) and gentle dehydration (3~).

3.

E, 1918 (1953); (b) W. A. White and H. (a) F. W. Hey1 and M. E. Herr, J_. Amer. Chem. E., K. C. Brannock, R. D. Burpitt, V. W. Goodlett Weingarten, J_. & Chem., g, 213m67);c) and J. G. Thweatt, J. %. Chem., 3;. 1464 (1963).

4. 5.

T. G. Selin, u. S. Patent 3,621,060; -C&em. Absts. 76:45258a (1972). R. Comi, R. W. Franck, M. Reitano, and S. M. Weinreb, E. =., 3107 (1973).

6.

B. Cox, M. S. Thesis, San Diego State University, 1973.

7.

(a) L. H. Hellberg, R. J. Milligan and R. N. Wilke, 4. w. So+., 2, 35 (1970); (b) F. A. van der Vlugt, J. W. Verhoeven and U. K. Pan&it, --Rec. Trav. Cblm. Pays-Bss, &., 1258 (1970).

a.

While the enol seems the more reasonable reactant, the influence of the enolketo on the course of reaction is unclear, especially with acid catalyst present.

9.

J.-C. Pormnier and A. Roubineau, J. Organometallic e.,

2,

101 (1973).

equilibrium