Vol. 140, No. 2, 1986
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
October 30, 1986
Pages 609-615
TROPYLIUM TETRAFLUOROBORATE, R. Bruce
A NOVEL SUBSTRATE FOR ALDEHYDE OXIDASE
Bank@
and Stewart
D. Barnett
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina 27412 Received
September
15,
1986
SUMMARY. The stabilized carbonium ion salt, tropylium tetrafluoroborate, was oxidized to tropone (cycloheptatrienone) by rabbit liver aldehyde oxidase related molybdenum hydroxylase, xanthine oxidase. but not by the closely The tropylium cation is an aromatic hydrocarbon which lacks the aldehyde, or iminium functional groups present in other substrates of aldehyde imine, oxidase. The unique structural features of the tropylium ion should make 'J 1986 Academic Press, it a useful tool for mechanistic studies of aldehyde oxidase. Inc.
The molybdenum oxidase
(E.C.1.2.3.2),
containing have in
mally
of xanthine
All contain
of
the
enzymes dized
(4). functional
nitrogen
Oxidation
It
these has group
or oxygen is
oxidase
reported
of
the
which
(2).
of
undergoes
*To whom correspondence
should
aldehyde
occurs
proposed
by the
oxidase
in conjugation
substrates
achieved
of
compounds
These
xenobiotics
hydroxylases into
such
enzymes
are the
reactions
for-
products are
and of pyridinium
the salts
(1).
carbon
serves
of
of several
introduced
Examples
by xanthine
substrates
been
(1,2).
molybdenum
oxygens
and xanthine
number
groups
and detoxication
in
acid
a large
functional
by the
to uric
(E.C.1.2.3.1)
of
catalyzed
water
an electrophilic
oxidation
iminium
from
by aldehyde
oxidase
oxidation
the metabolism
processes derived
the
or
Oxidations
ultimately
to pyridones
the
in
oxo-transfer
oxidation
The
imine
been implicated (3).
aldehyde
catalyze
aldehyde,
mammals
are
hydroxylases,
that attack
the
and
be addressed.
oxidase
a nitrogen
or oxygen
the
molybdenum
centers
electrophilic
to the
transfer
xanthine
with
carbon
by an active-site
as a ligand coupled
at
oxidase
of
nucleophile,
catalytic two
of
molybdenum
electrons
and
atom. of
the
the oxiwhile
center. a proton
Vol. 140, No. 2, 1986
Figure
with
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
I
II
III
1. Structures of the tropylium cation (I),
reduction
of Mo(V1) to Mo(IV);
by oxygen or other electron
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
tropyl alcohol (II),
the enzyme is
and tropone (III).
subsequently reoxidized
acceptors (5,6).
Although aldehyde oxidase and xanthine oxidase are similar and catalytic
mechanism, they differ
between the enzymes are especially
in substrate specificity
(7).
in structure Differences
apparent in the case of charged substrates.
For example, aldehyde oxidase catalyzes
the oxidation
quinolinium and other iminium ions at neutral
of numerous pyridinium,
pH, while xanthine oxidase acts
on these cations only at higher pH (8,9). The tropylium sesses certain oxidase.
ion (Figure
l,I),
although lacking
molecular features in commonwith charged substrates of aldehyde
Like pyridinium
salts,
it
few carbonium
lar
(10).
was investigated
its
tropyl
this
Because its
salts
ion is one of the in aqueous solution;
with the hydrolysis structure
product,
tropyl
and charge are very simi-
and other iminium ions,
that
communication we report form) is oxidized
tropylium
to tropone (III)
but not by bovine milk xanthine
this report provides the first as well as the first oxidation
electronic
an aromatic ring
the tropylium
ion
as a substrate for the molybdenumhydroxylases.
alcohol
hyde oxidase,
The tropylium
ions which is stable enough for existence
to those of pyridinium
In
(10).
pH the cation is in equilibrium
alcohol (II)
contains
is cationic,
system, and reacts with nncleophiles
at neutral
an iminium group, pos-
by rabbit
oxidase.
example of a tropylium
case of acationic
tetrafluoroborate
(or
hepatic alde-
To our knowledge,
cation biotransformation,
hydrocarbon acting
as a substrate
for
by aldehyde oxidase. MATERIALSANDMETHODS
chloride, menadione Reagents. Xanthine oxidase (Grade I), l-methylnicotinamide acid ferric-sodium salt were purchased from and ethylenediamine tetraacetic 610
Vol. 140, No. 2, 1986
BIOCHEMICAL
Sigma; potassium monohydrogen from Fisher; Triton X-100 ferricyanide from Mallinkrodt. tropone were gifts from Dr. Greensboro). The tropylium trile, and tropone was purified of these compounds (uv, nmr, (11-13).
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
and dihydrogen phosphates and potassium cyanide from U.S. Biochemical Corporation and potassium Samples of tropylium tetrafluoroborate and (University of North CarolinaJames C. Barborak tetrafluoroborate was recrystallized from acetoniby chromatography on silica gel. The spectra ir) were identical with those previously reported
Enzyme assays. Aldehyde oxidase was partially purified from rabbit livers (Pel-Freez Biologicals) by ammonium sulfate fractionation of the heat-treated homogenate (14). Control aldehyde oxidase activity was measured by the method of Rajagopalan and Handler using l-methylnicotinamide chloride as substrate and potassium ferricyanide as electron acceptor (15). Protein concentrations were assayed by the Lowry method (16). Enzymatic oxidation of tropylium tetrafluoroborate was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the rate of disappearance of the 420. nm band of ferricyanide. Sample cuvettes contained potassium phosphate (pH 7.8) or sodium carbonate (pHU.6) buffer (100 umole), EDTA (0.2 umole), aldehyde oxidase preparation (3 mg), potassium ferricyanide (3.0 umole), tropylium tetrafluoroborate (0.15-75.0 umole), and deionized water to give 3.0 ml final volume. Reference cuvettes contained deionized water instead of substrate. Reactions were initiated by addition of substrate after preincubation of cuvettes at 37" for five minutes. Inhibitors, when present, were included during the preincubations. Initial rates of ferricyanide reduction were determined over the first two minutes of reaction; activities were calculated using the extinction coefficient of ferricyanide Fixed wavelength measurements and repetitive (E 220 = 1040 M-l cm- ') (7). spectral scans were recorded on a Hitachi 100-80 model spectrophotometer equipped with thermostatted cell holders and program mode for enzyme kinetic analysis. Calculation of kinetic constants. Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters were calculated by non-linear regression of substrate concentration and initial velocity data using the computer program of Duggleby (17); initial estimates of the parameters were determined from Lineweaver-Burk plots. (18) HPLC Analysis. Ten flasks, each containing potassium phosphate buffer (100 umole; pH 7.8), aldehyde oxidase (6 mg), tropylium tetraEDTA (0.2 umole), fluoroborate (1.5 nmole) and deionized water to give 3.0 ml final volume, were incubated at 37" overnight and then combined. Controls containing heatdenatured aldehyde oxidase were incubated under identical condition. The samples and controls were extracted with ethyl acetate and the extracts dried Analyses were performed using a Perkin-Elmer over anhydrous sodium sulfate. C-18 reverse-phase Tridet system equipped with SSI Model 300 pump, an Alltech column and uv detector (256 nm). Methanol-water (70:30) was used as the mobile phase. RESULTS Tropylium hyde of
tetrafluoroborate
oxidase the
pylium
as measured
oxidation
served
by the
was greatly
oxidation
occurred
cess
was very
slow
tron
acceptors
for
mate
(19),
were
in
compared aldehyde
also
reduced
as a substrate
reduction
of
diminished the
at
ferricyanide pH 10.6.
absence
of enzyme,
that
the
with oxidase, when
of
for
enzymatic
rabbit (Table
A small but
the
rate
611
to
incubations
the
rate
amount
of
tro-
of this Other (14)
of
the
alde-
1);
reaction.
such as dichloroindophenol added
liver
proelec-
and chro-
tropylium
ion
Vol. 140, No. 2, 1986
Table
BIOCHEMICAL
1. Oxidation
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
of Tropylium Tetrafluoroborate by Molybdenum Hydroxylases: Effect of Enzyme and pH Oxidase Activity
Enzgme
(ml
substrate
oxidized/min/mg
pH 7.8
Aldehyde Oxidase Xanthine Oxidase
Protein)
pH 10.6
0.155 + 0.014 0.001 * 0.001
0.037 + 0.006 0.002
f 0.001
Ferricyanide assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Incubations contained l.OmM tropylium tetrafluoroborate. Assays with xanthine oxidase were carried out in the presence of 3.0 mg of enzyme. Reported activities are corrected for nonenzymatic oxidation and represent the mean ? S.D. of three experiments. Control aldehyde oxidase activity was 0.063 umole 1-methylnicotinamide chloride oxidized/min/mg protein; xanthine oxidase activity was 0.074 umole xanthine oxidized/min/mg protein. The rates of nonenzymatic tropylium oxidation were approximately 0.004 (pH 7.8) and 0.003 (pH 10.6) umole/min/mg protein.
with
the
enzyme.
for
xanthine The
oxidase rate in
compounds
which
the
the
by aldehyde
partially
purified
inhibit the
oxidase,
rather
than
inhibition incubated
Effect
2.
occurred with
when high aldehyde
oxidase
or
(Table of
by other
the
X-100,
(20).
tropylium
These ion
was
in
the
present
concentrations oxidase;
of tropylium
this
inhibition
Oxidation
% Inhibition 0
Menadione Triton
was
Triton 2)
enzymes
of Aldehyde Oxidase Inhibitors on Enzymatic Tropylium Tetrafluoroborate
--(3.3 X-100
Potassium
increase
a substrate
tetrafluoroborate
menadione,
oxidation
Compound
Oxidation
tropylium
cyanide,
observed
as
pH values.
of
aldehyde
inactive
preparations.
were
Table
that
and basic
potassium
to
was
oxidation
of
known
catalyzed
fluoroborate
enzymatic
suggest
Substrate
neutral
presence are
strongly
tetrafluoroborate
at both
of
decreased
data
Tropylium
rates
uM) (8
Cyanide
99
x lo-' (0.2
X)
76
mM)
46
were
determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the at 310nm for tropone formation. Assay mixtures phosphate buffer (33mM; pH 7.8), tropylium tetrafluoroborate oxidase (lmg/ml). Values represent the mean of two control aldehyde oxidase activity was 0.063 nmole chloride oxidized/min/mg protein.
in absorption
contained potassium (ImM), and aldehyde experiments. The 1-methylnicotinamide
612
tetrais
illus-
of
Vol.
140,
No. 2, 1986
0
AND
BIOPHYSICAL
03
,’
I
-5
2
BIOCHEMICAL
0
5
11s
IO
15
lo
RESEARCH
0 I 240
COMMUNICATIONS
300 350 WAVELENGTH (nm)
400
Figure 2. Lineweaver-Burk plot for the oxidation of tropylium tetrafluoroborate by rabbit liver aldehyde oxidase. Assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Calculations were carried out with data from three experiments, each in duplicate. Initial velocities were expressed in nmoles substrate oxidized/min/mg protein and substrate concentrations were in millimolar. KP, = 1.15 + 0.09 mM; vmax = 0.33 + 0.02 umoles/min/mg protein (mean + S.D.). Figure 3. Time-dependent spectroscopic changes during oxidation of tropylium tetrafluoroborate by rabbit liver aldehyde oxidase. The sample cuvettes (1 cm pathlength) contained potassium phosphate buffer (100 umole; pH 7.8), EDTA (.2 nmole), tropylium tetrafluoroborate (1.5 umole), aldehyde oxidase (3 mg), and deionized water to give 3.0 ml final volume; the reference cuvette contained all components except tropylium tetrafluoroborate. Spectra were recorded from 450-240 nm at 3-minute intervals for 30 minutes (37").
trated
in
velocity
the
double
data
(Figure
oxidase-catalyzed portion
ion
plot,
order
to
oxidation,
incubation was
band
at
point
was
prevented run is (Amax
obtain
ion
nm and
observed when
with
273
substrate
(2).
The apparent
nm) cannot
f 0.09mM
at
growth 273
nm.
was of
be directly
the
a new
These
initial
is
in
aldehyde
product
alcohol; observed 613
from
formed scans
As shown
band
of at
the
the
during
were
linear
in
Figure
the
absorption
were The
incubation. by
at
pH,
neutral
during
3, the oxida-
initial
changes
absorption
tropylium
recorded
311 nm; a clean
spectroscopic during
common
t S.D.).
disappearance
present
tropyl
(mean
oxidase.
of
and
Km, calculated
spectroscopic
aldehyde
concentration
inhibition
on
by progressive the
substrate
Such
information
menadione
characteristic
of
uv-visible
accompanied 256
plot
was 1.15
repetitive of the
tion
2).
reactions
of the In
reciprocal
the since
isosbestic completely band
tropyl the
at
256
cation alcohol
Vol. 140, No. 2, 1986
is
the
at
311
BIOCHEMICAL
predominant nm is
nm) as the
consistent
oxidation
when organic sis.
component
only
of extracts
denatured
of
the
from
was
were
time in
Xmax = 312
product
was confirmed
subjected
with
to HPLC analy-
active
as a reference
extracts
absorption
(reported
of the
incubations
present
The observed
tropone
incubations
same retention
tropone
of
The identity
scale
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
(21).
formation
(12).
of large
peak with
a trace
equilibrium
the
product
The chromatogram
ed a large
of the
with
extracts
AND BIOPHYSICAL
from
enzyme containsample
of tropone;
incubations
with
heat-
enzyme. DISCUSSION
Tropylium We,
imine
hyde
oxidase.
is
tetrafluoroborate or
to
to
in
in
the
oxidize
specificity
of
a carbonium groups
presented
tropone
oxidase
substrate
functional
Data
oxidized
aldehyde
iminium
is
the
present
this
of
tropylium
latter
salt
in
report
presence
the
ion
other
establish
aldehyde salt
enzyme,
which
lacks
substrates
of alde-
that
compound
this
oxidase.
further
the alde-
The
ability
underscores
particularly
toward
of
the
broad
cationic
com-
pounds. Aqueous mixture
of
latter it
solutions the
predominates is
for
the
aldehyde
the
the
substrates
of
covalent ions to often
be
the
equilibria
proposed
several
substrates
actual
Oxidation
the the
alcohol
consistent
decrease of
similar
aldehyde
true
cationic
the
as aldehydes
for
the
with
such
salts,
is
in the rate
that
iminium
neutral
do not establish
which
increasing
are
at
reduction
pH should
which
of an equilibrium
(II);
Our data
observed
the
consist product
(21).
tropyl
more
oxidase,
For
inhibitory
or
while
aldehyde
water.
its
= 1.8 x lo-')
increasing
cation
hydration
with
hydrolysis
and
pH is
since
of
(I)
However,
higher
substrate,
tetrafluoroborate
eq cation
oxidase. at
tration
(K
tropyl
oxidation
isms
cation
of tropylium
the
the and to
the
equilibrium
free
oxidase;
the
acting
as
concenOther
salts,
undergo
reaction cations
substrate
alcohol.
iminium
the
whether
of tropylium
form
tropyl
pH the
of
tropylium
have been
hydrated
forms
shown are
(22,23). of for
the the
tropylium action
cation of
can be rationalized
aldehyde 614
oxidase
(5,6).
in
terms For
of mechan-
example,
the
Vol.
140,
No. 2. 1986
tropylium hydride in
ion
could
transfer
analogy
with
those
act
ion
of
of aldehyde
oxidase.
or
as substrate
pylium
cation
of aldehyde
for should
serve
as the
donor
oxidase-catalyzed
is
enzyme.
make it
ion ligand
not
The unique
a useful
probe
and
subsequent
hydrolytic
oxidation;
the
steps
H-electrons
to molybdenum. to tropone
indicate a strict
COMMUNICATIONS
enzyme with
transfer)
iminium
results
RESEARCH
by the
tetrafluoroborate
Our group
the
attack
for
tropylium
iminium
BIOPHYSICAL
proton-electron
proposed
could
AND
nucleophilic
coupled
The oxidation
imine,
We,
undergo (or
of the troplium
tion
BIOCHEMICAL
that
the
presence
requirement structural for
the
is
for features
study
of
a novel
reac-
of an aldea molecule of the the
to tro-
mechanism
oxidations. REFERENCES
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.
Rajagopalan, K.V. (1981) Enzymatic Basis of Detoxication, Jakoby, W.J., Ed., pp. 295-309, Academic Press, New York. Bray, R.C. (1975) Enzymes 12, 299-419. Beedham, C. (1985) Drug Metabolism Reviews 16, 119-156. Coughlan, M.P. (1980) Molybdenum and Molybdenum-Containing Enzymes, pp. 138-140, Pergamon Press, New York. Olson, J.S., Ballou, D.P., Palmer, G., and Massey, V. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 249, 4363-4382. Stiefel, E.I. (1973) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 70, 988-992. Krenitsky, T.A., Neil, S.M., Elion, G.B., and Hitchings, G.H. (1972) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 150, 585-596. Greenlee, L., and Handler, P. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239, 1090-1095. Bunting, J.W., Laderoute, K.R., and Norris, D.J. (1980) Can. J. Biochem. 58, 394-398. Harmon, K. M. (1973) Carbonium Ions, Olah, G.A. and Schleyer, P. von R ., Eds., pp. 1579-1641, Wiley-Interscience, New York. Harmon, K.M., Cummings, F.E., Davis, D.A., and Diestler, D.J. (1962) J. Am. Chem. Sot. 84, 120-121. Dauben, H.J., and Ringold, H.J. (1951) J. Am. Chem. Sot. 73, 876-877. Harmon, K.M., Harmon, A.B., and Thompson, B.C. (1967) J. Am. Chem. Sot. 89, 5309-5311. Rajagopalan, K.V., Fridovich, I., and Handler, P. (1962) J. Biol. Chem. 237, 22-29. P. (1966) Methods in Enzymol. 9,364-368. Rajagopalan, K.V., and Handler, Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275. Duggleby, R.G. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 110, 9-18. Lineweaver, H. and Burk, D. (1934) J. Am. Chem. Sot. 56, 658-666. Banks, R.B., and Cooke, R.T. (1986) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 137, 8-14. Rajagopalan, K.V., and Handler, P. (1964) J. Biol. Chem. 239, 2022-2026. Doering, W. Von E., and Knox, L.H. (1954) J. Am. Chem. Sot. 76, 32033206. Brandige, S., and Lindblom, L. (1979) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 91, 991-996. Thomas, H.G., and Reunitz, P.C. (1984) J. Heterocyl. Chem. 21, 1057-1062.
615