Tumbling dynamics of individual absorbed polymer chains in shear flow

Tumbling dynamics of individual absorbed polymer chains in shear flow

Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 670–672 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chinese Chemical Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/loc...

434KB Sizes 0 Downloads 32 Views

Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 670–672

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Chinese Chemical Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cclet

Original article

Tumbling dynamics of individual absorbed polymer chains in shear flow Li-Jun Liu, Wen-Duo Chen, Ji-Zhong Chen *, Li-Jia An State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China

A R T I C L E I N F O

A B S T R A C T

Article history: Received 20 February 2014 Received in revised form 18 March 2014 Accepted 18 March 2014 Available online 1 April 2014

The tumbling dynamics of individual absorbed polymer chains in shear flow is studied by employing multi-particle collision dynamics simulation techniques combined with molecular dynamics simulations. We find that the dependence of tumbling frequencies on shear rate is independent of both adsorption strength and surface corrugate. ß 2014 Ji-Zhong Chen. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Shear Simulation Tumbling Absorbed

1. Introduction Polymers in solution exposed to shear flow exhibit large conformational changes due to tumbling motion, i.e., they stretch and collapse with a characteristic frequency depending on shear rate. This behavior has intensively been studied experimentally and numerically [1–7]. In contrast, the flow-induced dynamical behavior of polymers absorbed on a surface has received far less attention [8]. Insight into the behavior of such systems is of fundamental importance in a wide spectrum of systems ranging from the separation of macromolecules using microcircuit devices to the gene therapy in which DNA is transported to a desired target site [9–13]. The dynamic behavior of an absorbed polymer in shear flow is governed by various parameters; aside from the shear rate, the properties of surfaces are of major importance. Since the tumbling dynamics is usually observed at high shear rates close to the critical shear rate at which chains desorb, hydrodynamic interactions (HI) are also believed to play an important role in this behavior. In this letter, we investigate the tumbling dynamics of individual absorbed polymers by a hybrid mesoscale simulation approach, which combining molecular dynamics for the polymer molecules with the multiparticle collision dynamics describing the solvent [14]. As has been shown, this hybrid method is very well

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (J.-Z. Chen).

suited to study the properties of polymer solutions, where both thermal fluctuations and hydrodynamics are important [15,16]. 2. Experimental In our model, a flexible polymer chain in an explicit solvent consists of N = 20 monomers of mass M each. The excluded-volume interactions between monomers are described by the truncatedshift purely repulsive Lennard–Jones (LJ) potential with the parameter s characterizing the monomer size and e the energy. A finite extensible nonlinear elastic potential (FENE), with the maximum bond length 1.5 s and the spring constant 30 e/s2, is used to model the connectivity between adjacent monomers of the chain. The monomer dynamics is determined by Newton’s equations of motion, which are integrated by the velocity Verlet algorithm with time step hp. The multiparticle collision dynamics method is used to describe the solvent. It is composed of Ns pointlike particles of mass m. The algorithm consists of alternating streaming and collision steps. In the streaming step, the solvent particles move ballistically for a time h. In the collision steps, particles are sorted into cubic cells of side length and their relative velocities, with respect to the center-of-mass velocity of their cell, are rotated around a randomly oriented axis by a fixed angle a. The solvent–polymer coupling is achieved by taking the monomers into account in the collision step. The system is confined between two parallel walls as shown in Fig. 1. Shear flow is imposed by sliding the upper wall relative to the lower wall at a constant rate and periodic boundary conditions are applied parallel to the walls.

1001-8417/$ – see front matter ß 2014 Ji-Zhong Chen. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Chemical Society. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2014.03.042

L.-J. Liu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 670–672

671

3. Results and discussion

Fig. 1. Schematic depiction of an absorbed polymer chain under shear flow.

We impose no-slip boundary conditions at walls for solvent particles. The chain is absorbed on the lower wall by the LJ potential with the interaction strength ew and the cutoff distance 2.5 s, Uadsorb. Two types of walls are considered. The first is a smooth surface for monomers; the second is atomically corrugated and the interactions between monomers and the surface are U = Uadsorb [1 + A cos(2px/q) sin(2py/q)] with q = 1 and A = 0.2 consistent with previous works [17]. The energy of interaction of the chain with the lower wall includes repulsive and attractive parts, the attractive part makes the chain adsorb on the surface and the repulsive part avoids monomer moving outside the wall. Periodic boundary conditions are applied in the directions parallel to the walls. The shear flow with shear rate = Vwall/Lz is introduced into the system by the motion of the upper wall and bounce-back boundary condition being applied simultaneously, which means the solvent particles reverse their direction of velocity but keep the magnitude constant. The system is in the canonical ensemble (NVT) and the viscous friction of particles with the walls of the simulation box creates heat that result in temperature rising, which can influence the velocity of particles, therefore thermostatting is required in the nonequilibrium MPCD simulation. A local Maxwellian thermostat is used to keep the temperature at the desired value [18]. All simulations are performed with s = e = a = 1, a = 1308, the average number of solvent particles per cell r = 10, M = rm, h = 0.1s(m/kBT)1/2 (where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T the temperature), hp/h = 20, m = 1, and kBT = 1. A simulation box with size 30  20  20 is applied. More than 50 parallel samples with different initial conditions for each data to improve the quality of the results. 6

When polymer fluids are subjected to a simple shear flow, the velocity across the chain is substantial, and hence it may undergo large conformational changes; i.e., a polymer chain stretches and recoils in the course of time [1–5]. The instantaneous conformation of polymers can be quantitatively characterized by the gyration P tensor, which is defined as Gab ¼ N i¼1 Dr i;a Dr i;b =N, where Dri,a is the position of monomer i in the center of mass reference frame of the polymer and a,b 2 x,y,z denote Cartesian components [16]. The average gyration tensor is denoted as hGabi, where hi denotes ensemble average. It is noticed that Gab can be directly accessed in single molecule experiments and hGabi in scattering experiments. At infinite dilution, the flow strength is characterized by the Weissenberg number Wi ¼ g˙  t , where g˙ is the shear rate and t0 the longest relaxation time obtained at equilibrium. The tumbling dynamics of polymers absorbed on surfaces is observed for Wi  1 where the chains are not able to relax back to the equilibrium conformation. The time traces of relative deformation of chains along the flow and gradient directions are shown in Fig. 2. It is clear that in the tumbling process, the extension of a chain along the flow direction always follows the shrinkage of its gradient thickness, or a chain stretching along the gradient direction follows the retraction in the flow direction. Furthermore, the maximum extension in the flow (gradient) direction always relates to the shrinkage in the gradient (flow) direction. In order to obtain the characteristic time for the tumbling dynamics, we determine the cross-correlation function between the conformational changes in flow and gradient directions, calculated as [3,6,15,19]

dGxx ðt0 ÞdGzz ðt0 þ tÞ C xz ðtÞ ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi hdGxx ðt 0 Þ2 ihdGzz ðt 0 Þ2 i

(1)

Here dGaa = Gaa  hGaai. Fig. 3 shows cross-correlation functions for several Weissenberg numbers for ew = 4.0. Similarly to unconstrained linear polymers, the tumbling dynamics of absorbed polymers is not perfectly periodic because the autocorrelation, Cxz, decays to zero at large time-lags. Cxz exhibits the maximum at t, indicating that positive values of dGxx are correlated with positive values dGzz, or a collapsed state along the x-direction is correlated with a previous collapsed sated in y-direction. The minimum of Cxz at t+ reveals that positive values of dGaa are linked with negative ones of the orthogonal directions;

G / xx xx

0.4

=4.0

t+

Wi = 411.8 Wi = 617.7 Wi = 823.6

W

4

Cxz

Gαα/

G / zz zz

0.2

2 0.0

t0

0

100

200

300

400

500

t Fig. 2. Time trajectories of the extensions of the radius of gyration along the flow and gradient directions for Wi = 617.7 with ew = 4.0.

-1000

0

t

1000

Fig. 3. Cross-correlation functions for a polymer absorbed on the smooth surface with ew = 4.0 for various Weissenberg numbers as indicated.

L.-J. Liu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 25 (2014) 670–672

672

used to characterize the tumbling motion. The results show that the normalized tumbling frequencies follow the power law ft  Wi0.80. We find that both adsorptive strength and surface corrugation have no influence on the scaling behavior of tumbling dynamics.

16

slope = 0.8

ft

12

8

Acknowledgments

smooth surface w = 3.0

smooth surface w = 4.0

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21274153). We are grateful to Computing Center of Jilin Province for essential support.

corrugated surface w = 4.0

References

smooth surface w = 3.5

4 300

600

900

1200

Wi Fig. 4. The normalized tumbling frequencies ft, scaled with the relaxation time t0 for various ew as indicated.

i.e., polymer compresses in the z-direction is linked with its extension in x-direction. Hence, the difference t+  t is related to conformational changes of polymers due to tumbling. Here, the characteristic of tumbling motion is defined as tt = 2(t+  t), where the factor two is attributed to two non-equivalent conformations leading to a maximum and a minimum, respectively. Normalized tumbling frequencies ft = t0/tt, scaled by the relaxation time t0, as a function of the Weissenberg number are shown in Fig. 4. Data for various absorption strengths collapse onto m a universal curve, which can be described by a power law ft  Wi with m = 0.80. Lo¨wen and his co-workers reported a larger exponent m = 0.90 obtained by Brownian dynamics simulations [8]. In their work, the characteristic time is calculated from the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation of the radius of gyration [8]. However, Delgado-Buscalioni pointed out that the more nature measure of the tumbling motion is the cross correlation between the chain extension along flow and gradient directions, namely, Eq. (1) [19]. This scaling behavior is practically consistent with that of a polymer with one end tethered on a surface, for which ft  Wi0.78 is observed [19]. For unconstrained individual polymers in dilute solution, a somewhat smaller exponent m = 0.67 was obtained in Refs. [2,3,6]. Furthermore, Fig. 4 also shows that the corrugation of surfaces has no effect on the shear dependence of ft. 4. Conclusion In summary, we study the tumbling dynamics of individual absorbed polymer chains in shear flow. The cross-correlation between the chain extension along flow and gradient directions are

[1] S. Gerashchenko, V. Steinberg, Statistics of tumbling of a single polymer molecule in shear flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 038304. [2] C.M. Schroeder, R.E. Teixeira, E.S.G. Shaqfeh, S. Chu, Characteristic periodic motion of polymers in shear flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 018301. [3] C.C. Huang, G. Sutmann, G. Gompper, Tumbling of polymers in semidilute solution under shear flow, Europhys. Lett. 93 (2011) 54004. [4] C. Aust, S. Hess, M. Kro¨er, Rotation and deformation of a finitely extendable flexible polymer molecule in a steady shear flow, Macromolecules 35 (2002) 8621–8630. [5] S. Liu, B. Ashok, M. Muthukumar, Brownian dynamics simulations of bead-rodchain simple shear flow and elongational flow, Polymer 45 (2004) 1383–1389. [6] R.E. Teixeira, H.P. Babcock, E.S.G. Shaqfeh, S. Chu, Shear thinning and tumbling dynamics of single polymers in the flow-gradient plane, Macromolecules 38 (2005) 581–592. [7] C.M. Schroeder, R.E. Teixeira, E.S.G. Shaqfeh, S. Chu, Dynamics of DNA in the flowgradient plane of steady shear flow: observations and simulations, Macromolecules 38 (2005) 1967–1978. [8] G.L. He, R. Messina, H. Lo¨wen, Statistics of polymer adsorption under shear flow, J. Chem. Phys. 132 (2010) 124903. [9] B.D. Ratner, S.J. Bryant, Biomaterials: where we have been and where we are going, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6 (2004) 41–75. [10] F. Rusmini, Z.Y. Zhong, J. Feijen, Protein immobilization strategies for protein biochips, Biomacromolecules 8 (2007) 1775–1789. [11] M. Chopra, R.G. Larson, Brownian dynamics simulations of isolated polymer molecules in shear flow near adsorbing and nonadsorbing surfaces, J. Rheol. 46 (2002) 831–862. [12] C. Zhang, J. Xu, W. Ma, W. Zheng, PCR microfluidic devices for DNA amplification, Biotechnol. Adv. 24 (2006) 243–284. [13] M. Hashimoto, F. Barany, S.A. Soper, Polymerase chain reaction/ligase detection reaction/hybridization assays using flow-through microfluidic devices for the detection of low-abundant DNA point mutations, Biosens. Bioelectron. 21 (2006) 1915–1923. [14] A. Malevanets, R. Kapral, Mesoscopic model for solvent dynamics, J. Chem. Phys. 110 (1999) 8605–8613. [15] W.D. Chen, J.Z. Chen, L.J. An, Tumbling and tank-treading dynamics of individual ring polymers in shear flow, Soft Matter 9 (2013) 4312–4318. [16] W.D. Chen, J.Z. Chen, L.J. Liu, X.L. Xu, L.J. An, Effects of chain stiffness on conformational and dynamical properties of individual ring polymers in shear flow, Macromolecules 46 (2013) 7542–7549. [17] T.G. Desai, P. Keblinski, S.K. Kumar, S. Granick, Modeling diffusion of adsorbed polymer with explicit solvent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 218301. [18] C.C. Huang, A. Chatterji, G. Sutmann, G. Gompper, R.G. Winkler, Cell-level canonical sampling by velocity scaling for multiparticle collision dynamics simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010) 168–177. [19] R. Delgado-Buscalioni, Cyclic motion of a grafted polymer under shear flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 088303.