Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

British Journal of Anaesthesia 103 (4): 622 (2009)

doi:10.1093/bja/aep256

Corrigenda Reversal of neuromuscular block (BJA 2009; 103: 115– 29) In this Review Article, the dosage of neostigmine was incorrectly published as mg kg21 instead of mg kg21 in the following places:

Column

Paragraph

Line

Error

Correction

116 117 117

1 2 2

1 3 3

2 10 –11 12 –13

Neostigmine 0.04 – 0.07 mg kg21 Neostigmine 0.04 – 0.07 mg kg21 Neostigmine 0.07 mg kg21

Neostigmine 0.04 – 0.07 mg kg21 Neostigmine 0.04 – 0.07 mg kg21 Neostigmine 0.07 mg kg21

The authors apologize for any confusion this may have caused.

British Journal of Anaesthesia 103 (4): 622 (2009)

doi:10.1093/bja/aep257

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (BJA 2009; 102: 763– 7) The second sentence of the Results section of the abstract of this article read: ‘Patients in Group A received significantly more intraoperative sufentanil and postoperative morphine compared with those in Group B [mean (SD) 8.6 (3.5) vs 23.0 (4.8) mg, P,0.01, and 10.5 (7.7) vs 22.8 (4.3) mg, P,0.05].’ This should have read: ‘Patients in Group A received significantly less intraoperative sufentanil and postoperative morphine . . . ’ The authors apologize for any confusion this may have caused.

# The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected]

Downloaded from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/ at North Dakota State University on June 8, 2015

Page