Accepted Manuscript Understanding the mechanism of dissolution enhancement for poorly water-soluble ® drugs by solid dispersions containing Eudragit E PO Xia Lin, Lili Su, Na Li, Yang Hu, Gang Tang, Lei Liu, Hongmei Li, Ziyi Yang PII:
S1773-2247(18)30931-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.jddst.2018.10.008
Reference:
JDDST 792
To appear in:
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
Received Date: 18 August 2018 Revised Date:
5 October 2018
Accepted Date: 8 October 2018
Please cite this article as: X. Lin, L. Su, N. Li, Y. Hu, G. Tang, L. Liu, H. Li, Z. Yang, Understanding the mechanism of dissolution enhancement for poorly water-soluble drugs by solid dispersions containing ® Eudragit E PO, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology (2018), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jddst.2018.10.008. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Understanding the mechanism of dissolution enhancement for poorly water-soluble drugs by
2
solid dispersions containing Eudragit® E PO
3 4
Xia Lin, Lili Su, Na Li, Yang Hu, Gang Tang, Lei Liu, Hongmei Li, Ziyi Yang*
6
RI PT
5
School of Pharmaceutical Science, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Road, Wuxi 214122, China
7
SC
8 9 Corresponding author:
11
Corresponding author: Ziyi Yang *
12
Mailing address: School of Pharmaceutical Science, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Road, Wuxi
13
214122, China
14
Tel.: +86-(0)510-85197769
15 16
E-mail:
[email protected]
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
10
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 17
Abstract In this paper, we intended to understand the mechanism of dissolution enhancement for poorly
19
water-soluble drugs by amorphous solid dispersions containing EUDRAGIT® E PO (EPO).
20
Equilibrium solubility enhancement for three model drugs including ibuprofen, felodipine and
21
bifendate were tested in acidic solutions containing different concentrations of EPO. Three model
22
drugs were prepared into amorphous solid dispersions by hot melt extrusion with EPO. Results showed
23
that EPO can substantially solubilize model drugs in acidic solution to 20 to 300 fold of their
24
thermodynamic solubilities. Linear solubilizing relationships between EPO and drugs were achieved
25
for all three drugs. It was found that amorphous solid dispersions with drug loadings below solubilizing
26
range showed no recrystallization in dissolution tests whereas drug concentration reduction was seen in
27
dissolution tests when drug loadings were above the solubilizing range. By combining the results from
28
dynamic laser scattering, critical micelle concentration (CMC) and morphology studies, it was
29
confirmed that EPO can form micelles in acidic solution, and the CMC value was estimated as 0.99
30
µg/ml. In conclusion, the dissolution enhancement for poorly water-soluble drugs by amorphous solid
31
dispersions containing EPO was combined contribution from both the physical structure of solid
32
dispersions and the solubilizing effect of EPO.
33
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
18
Keywords: solubilizing effect, micelles, EUDRAGIT® E PO, amorphous solid dispersions, solubility
35
enhancement
AC C
EP
34
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction
37
The enhancement of dissolution rate as well as bioavailability of poorly water-soluble active
38
pharmaceutical ingredients (API) remained one of the most challenging issues in the pharmaceutical
39
industry with increasing production of APIs by the high throughput screening [1]. The preparation of
40
amorphous solid dispersions has proved to be effective in improving the dissolution behavior of BCS II
41
drugs in many researches [2-4]. Despite the physical instability, the growing quantities of
42
commercialized medicines based on solid dispersions approved by FDA further demonstrated that solid
43
dispersion was effective and promising in enhancing dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drugs [5,
44
6].
SC
RI PT
36
The underpinning mechanism of dissolution enhancement by solid dispersions has been well
46
studied in literature [7-9]. Fundamentally, drugs can be evenly dispersed amongst polymeric carriers,
47
forming a dispersion where drugs were separated as single molecule within the solid dispersion
48
[10,11]. Consequently, the lattice structure of APIs that had to be destroyed during dissolution
49
disappeared completely in solid dispersions, and hence the dissolution rate of APIs can be significantly
50
enhanced in comparison with the corresponding crystalline APIs [9]. In addition, the applied polymeric
51
carriers in solid dispersions may have special physicochemical properties, i.e. hydrophilic, which can
52
further improve the dissolution performance [12-14]. The molecularly dispersed structure and the
53
assistance from polymeric carriers were considered to be the main reasons that made amorphous solid
54
dispersions exhibit considerably enhanced dissolution rate.
TE D
M AN U
45
EUDRAGIT® E PO was a cationic copolymer that was composed of dimethylaminoethyl
56
methacrylate and neutral methacrylic ester units [15]. It was a pH-dependent soluble polymer which
57
only dissolved at the pH below 5 [16]. EUDRAGIT® E PO was naturally amorphous with a glass
58
transition temperature of approximately 50 oC, and it was perfectly applicable in hot melt extrusion for
59
the preparation of solid dispersions due to being thermoplastic [17-19]. Originally, EUDRAGIT® E PO
60
was widely used for taste masking in the pharmaceutical industry [20, 21]. Later, in the field of solid
61
dispersions, EUDRAGIT® E PO was reported to be effective in enhancing the dissolution rate of
62
poorly water soluble drugs and improving the physical stability of amorphous solid dispersions against
63
stressed humidity [22, 23]. In the report where EUDRAGIT® E PO was formulated with curcumin into
64
amorphous solid dispersions, it was found that water solubility of curcumin was increased to 3 mg/ml
65
that was similar to the solubility in organic solvents, and such solubility enhancement was attributed to
AC C
EP
55
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the formation of hydrogen bonding between curcumin and EUDRAGIT® E PO [24]. Similarly in
67
another report, EUDRAGIT® E PO was formulated with mefenamic acid by cryogenic grinding into
68
solid dispersions, and the bioavailability study showed that the AUC value of the solid dispersion was
69
7.8 fold higher than that of pure drug. In this research, the increased bioavailability was concluded to
70
be the contribution from the molecular interaction between the carboxyl groups from mefenamic acid
71
and aminoalkyl groups from EUDRAGIT® E PO in the amorphous solid dispersion [25]. These results
72
showed that molecular interaction between EUDRAGIT® EPO and drugs played a significant role in
73
enhancing the dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drugs. Previously in our paper, it was reported
74
that EUDRAGIT® E PO could solubilize typical BCS II drug, felodipine, increasing its equilibrium
75
solubility in 0.1 M HCl by circa over 250 times, and no molecular interaction was observed between
76
felodipine and EUDRAGIT® E PO as demonstrated by the FTIR study [23]. The mechanism for such
77
solubilizing effect, however, was not revealed in that research, but it indeed proved that in addition to
78
the molecular interaction, there may exist other mechanisms that could explain the solubilizing effect.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
66
EUDRAGIT® E PO has shown the potential of being a useful polymeric carrier candidate for solid
80
dispersions to enhance the dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drugs. In addition, it might not be
81
common that a new BCS II API could easily form molecular interaction with EUDRAGIT® E PO.
82
Consequently, the solubilizing effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl should be deeply understood
83
to better apply this polymer in solid dispersions. In this paper, we intended to understand the
84
mechanism of dissolution enhancement for poorly water soluble drugs in EUDRAGIT® E PO based
85
solid dispersions. Three typical BCSII drugs including felodipine, ibuprofen and bifendate were
86
selected as the model drugs, and were prepared into solid dispersions by hot melt extrusion. The
87
equilibrium solubilities of three model drugs in 0.1 M HCl with different concentrations of
88
EUDRAGIT® E PO were measured. Comparison between the solubilized equilibrium solubilities and
89
the dissolution of drugs from hot melt extrudates was carried out to investigate the role of solubilizing
90
effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO in dissolution enhancement. By further using microscopic, fluorescence
91
probe and particle sizing approaches, the solubilizing effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO and the dissolution
92
mechanism of melt extrudates from solid dispersions containing EUDRAGIT® E PO may be
93
understood.
94
2. Materials and Methods
95
2.1. Materials
AC C
EP
TE D
79
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 96
Ibuprofen, felodipine and bifendate were purchased from Hubei Yuancheng Saichuang Technology
97
Co., LTD. EUDRAGIT® E PO was donated by Evonik Industries AG. All other chemical reagents
98
were of analytical grade.
99
2.2. Analytical method High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed for the quantification of
101
three model drugs.
RI PT
100
HPLC method for ibuprofen was achieved by modifying the USP ibuprofen HPLC method (USP
103
39), and the detail of the method in this study was: concentration of ibuprofen was determined by
104
Agilent 1260 HPLC (Agilent Technologies Inc., Germany) equipped with a UV detector at 263 nm.
105
The column was ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (5 µm, 4.6×150 mm), and the mobile phase was
106
composed of acetonitrile and KH2PO4 buffer solution (2.12 mg/ml, pH 2.5, 45:55, v/v). The validation
107
study for ibuprofen HPLC method was described in the Supplementary material.
M AN U
SC
102
HPLC method for felodipine was achieved from the literature [26], and the detail of the method
109
was: concentration of felodipine was determined by Agilent 1260 HPLC (Agilent Technologies Inc.,
110
Germany) equiped with a UV detector at 238nm. The column was ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column
111
(5 µm, 4.6×150 mm), and the mobile phase was composed of methanol, acetonitrile and water
112
(50:15:35, v/v/v).
TE D
108
HPLC method for bifendate was achieved from the China Pharmacopeia 2015 (ChP 2015)
114
bifendate HPLC method, and the detail of the method was: concentration of bifendate was determined
115
by Agilent 1260 HPLC (Agilent Technologies Inc., Germany) equiped with a UV detector at 278 nm.
116
The column was ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (5 µm, 4.6×150 mm), and the mobile phase was
117
composed of methanol and water (56:44, v/v). The validation study for bifendate HPLC method was
118
described in the Supplementary material.
119
2.3. Determination of equilibrium solubilities of drugs in EUDRAGIT® E PO-0.1 M HCl solutions
120
Different amounts of EUDRAGIT® E PO were dissolved in 0.1 M HCl solution to prepare 0.1 M HCl
121
solution with EUDRAGIT® E PO concentrations including 5 mg/ml, 15 mg/ml, 25 mg/ml, and 35
122
mg/ml (abbreviated as EUDRAGIT® E -HCl). Excessive amount of felodipine, ibuprofen and bifendate
123
were dispersed in different EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions, and the solutions were maintained at 37 oC
124
with continuous magnetic stirring for up to 72 hours. Subsequently, all EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions
125
were centrifuged at 5000 r/min for 10 min and filtered through 0.22 µm membrane filters. The drug
AC C
EP
113
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT concentration in each EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution was determined using HPLC method as described
127
in the section of “Analytical method”.
128
2.4. Dissolution tests of drugs in EUDRAGIT® E PO-0.1 M HCl solution
129
In order to obtain the dissolution rate of pure crystalline drugs with the existence of EUDRAGIT® E
130
PO in acidic media, dissolution tests of the three model drugs in the same EUDRAGIT® E-HCl
131
solutions were carried out. Paddle method with the speed of 100 r/min at 37 oC was used for the
132
dissolution studies of pure drugs, and the volume of media was 900 ml. Excessive amount of each
133
model drug was dispersed in different EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions, including 5 mg/ml, 15 mg/ml, 25
134
mg/ml and 35 mg/ml. 5 ml samples were withdrawn at 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h,
135
24 h, 48 h, 72 h and filtered through 0.22 µm membrane filters. For all dissolution tests, drug powder
136
was screened by 60 mesh sieve before the test, and was directed transferred into the dissolution media.
137
Drug concentrations in withdrawn samples were determined using HPLC methods as described in the
138
section of “Analytical method”.
139
2.5. Hot melt extrusion
140
Amorphous solid dispersions of model drugs and EUDRAGIT® E PO were prepared by hot melt
141
extrusion method. Prior to extrusion, the model drugs and EUDRAGIT® E PO were passed through a
142
60 mesh sieve, respectively. The three model drugs, ibuprofen, felodipine and bifendate, were then
143
accurately weighed and mixed with EUDRAGIT® E PO to obtain homogenous physical mixtures,
144
respectively. The physical mixtures were extruded using Thermo Fisher Process 11 Twin-Screw
145
extruder (Thermo Scientific, Germany). Temperature zones of the extruder were all set at the
146
temperatures slightly above the melting points of model drugs (90 oC for ibuprofen, 150 oC for
147
felodipine and 180 oC for bifendate) [27-29]. For all sample preparation, the speed of twin screw was
148
set at 50 r/min. Extrudates with the drug loading of 4% and 10% (w/w) were prepared for ibuprofen.
149
Extrudates with the drug loading of 0.7% and 1.5% (w/w) were prepared for felodipine. Extrudates
150
with the drug loading of 1% (w/w) were prepared for bifendate.
151
2.6. Dissolution tests of hot melt extrudates
152
Dissolution tests of hot melt extrudates containing different model drugs were conducted using paddle
153
method. Prior to tests, all the hot melt extrudates were pulverized and passed through a 60 mesh sieve,
154
respectively. 2 g of the pulverized hot melt extrudates were accurately weighed and evaluated for the
155
dissolution tests. The dissolution tests were performed on a RC806D dissolution tester (Tianda Tianfa
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
126
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Technology Co. Ltd., China) with the paddle speed of 100 r/min at 37 oC, and 900 ml 0.1 M HCl was
157
used as the dissolution media. For all dissolution tests, the pulverized and sieved hot melt extrudates
158
were accurately weighted and kept on the folded weighing paper, and these powder samples were
159
directly transferred into the dissolution media for the dissolution tests. 5 ml samples were withdrawn at
160
5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 20 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 10 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, and were
161
substituted with equal volume of fresh dissolution media. The samples were immediately filtered
162
through 0.22 µm membrane filters, and were analyzed using HPLC methods as mentioned in the
163
section of “Analytical method”.
164
2.7. Determination of particle size distribution of EUDRAGIT® E PO solution
165
In order to confirm whether or not micelles were formed by EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl solution,
166
dynamic laser scattering was applied to determine the particle size. Basically, EUDRAGIT® E-HCl
167
solutions with different concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO (1, 2, 5, 15, 25 and 35 mg/ml) were
168
tested using NicompTM 380 Particle Sizing System (Santa Barbara, CA, USA) at 25 oC, and the results
169
were presented with particle size distribution of the solution. In addition, the particle size distribution
170
of each EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution saturated with the three model drugs at 25 oC was also analyzed.
171
2.8. Determination of critical micelle concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO
172
Pyrene-based fluorescent probe method was applied to determine the critical micelle concentration
173
(CMC) of EUDRAGIT® E PO [30]. Pyrene was dissolved in acetone to achieve the pyrene solution
174
with the concentration of 1×10-5 mol/ml, and the solution was then transferred to 10 volumetric flasks
175
(10 ml) with each volumetric flask containing 100 µL pyrene solution, and acetone was evaporated at
176
room temperature. EUDRAGIT® E PO was also dissolved in acetone with the concentrations ranging
177
from 5×10-3 mg/ml to 10 mg/ml. Subsequently, adequate EUDRAGIT® E PO solution was transferred
178
to each volumetric flask that already contained pyrene, and acetone was evaporated at room
179
temperature for 8 hours. After evaporation, 0.1 M HCl solution was added into each flask to the
180
volume. Finally in each volumetric flask, the concentration of pyrene was 1×10-7 mol/ml, and the
181
concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO was 1 mg/ml, 5×10-1 mg/ml, 1×10-1 mg/ml, 5×10-2 mg/ml, 1×10-2
182
mg/ml, 5×10-3 mg/ml, 1×10-3 mg/ml, 5×10-4 mg/ml, 1×10-4 mg/ml and 5×10-5 mg/ml, respectively. All
183
solutions were equilibrated for 24 hours at room temperature before test. Solutions were tested using
184
fluorescence spectrophotometry. The emission wavelength was set at 390 nm with the slit of 2.5 nm
185
and 5 nm. The scanning speed was 240 nm/min with the range from 300 nm to 350 nm. The ratio of
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
156
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT fluorescence intensity at 337 nm (I337) to the intensity at 334 nm (I334) were calculated and plotted
187
against the log of concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO to achieve the CMC of EUDRAGIT® E PO in
188
0.1 M HCl solution.
189
2.9. Transmission electron microscopy
190
In order to directly observe the micelles formed by EUDRAGIT® E PO, transmission electron
191
microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL, Japan) was used. The sample was prepared by spreading
192
EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution with the concentration of 2 mg/ml over a copper grid covered with
193
carbon film and was dried at room temperature.
194
3. Results and discussion
195
3.1. Equilibrium solubility enhancement for model drugs by EUDRAGIT® E PO in acidic solution
196
The solubilizing effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl on model drugs was studied in this work.
197
Different amounts of EUDRAGIT® E PO were dissolved in 0.1 M HCl to create EUDRAGIT® E-HCl
198
solutions with the concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO ranging from 5 mg/ml to 35 mg/ml. The
199
results of measured equilibrium solubilities of model drugs in different solutions were shown in Table
200
S1. It can be seen that in 0.1 M HCl solution, EUDRAGIT® E PO was capable to solubilize all three
201
model drugs. For ibuprofen, the equilibrium solubility was increased by almost 45 times when the
202
concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO was 35 mg/ml (close to saturated concentration of EUDRAGIT®
203
E PO in 0.1 M HCl). In the same EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution, compared with the equilibrium
204
solubility of each drug, felodipine was solubilized by circa 300 times and bifendate was solubilized by
205
almost 12 times. The three model drugs were typical BSCII drugs which had different chemical
206
structures and varied in molecular weight and functional chemical groups (Fig. 1). These solubilizing
207
results, therefore, may demonstrate that in acidic solution or in simulated gastric media, EUDRAGIT®
208
E PO was able to increase the equilibrium solubility of poorly water soluble drugs.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
209
RI PT
186
It was also seen in Table S1 that the solubilized concentrations of model drugs increased with
210
increasing concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions. Regression
211
analysis was carried out to investigate the solubilizing effect as shown in Fig. 2. The measured
212
concentrations of the drug in the corresponding EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution were plotted against the
213
concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions. It was seen in Fig. 2 that
214
linear relationships between the concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO and the solubilized concentration
215
of the drug were confirmed for all three model drugs as proved by the acceptable regression
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 216
coefficients (R>0.99). It should be noted that the concentration of 35 mg/ml for EUDRAGIT® E-HCl
217
solution was close to the solubility of EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1M HCl. Therefore, these results may
218
suggest that within the total concentration range of EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions, the solubilizing
219
effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO was likely to be linear. In addition, solubility enhancement study by EUDRAGIT® E PO with further pH value
221
adjustment was also carried out. Basically, for each equilibrated EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution with
222
saturated drugs, after 72 hour, phosphate buffer solution was added in to adjust the pH value of each
223
solution to 6.8. It was observed that with the addition of phosphate buffer, all solutions slightly turned
224
into opaque. After 5 to 20 min, however, the slightly opaque solutions all became clear again. By
225
measuring the drug concentration, it was found in each pH 6.8 buffered drug solutions, the drug
226
concentration was the same as the value before the addition of phosphate buffer. These results may
227
demonstrate that formulations that took advantage of the solubilizing effect by EUDRAGIT® E PO
228
may not be affected by the change of pH values across the GI tract.
229
3.2. Dissolution behavior of model drugs in acidic media with EUDRAGIT® E PO
230
The measurement of the equilibrium solubilities of the three model drugs in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl
231
solutions demonstrated that EUDRAGIT® E PO was capable to solubilize poorly water soluble drugs in
232
acidic media. The time length that was required to reach the equilibrium, however, was not known. In
233
addition, when attempting to understand the mechanism of the dissolution enhancement of solid
234
dispersions containing EUDRAGIT® E PO, it was necessary to gain the dissolution rate of pure drugs
235
with the existence of EUDRAGIT® E PO in acidic media. Therefore the dissolution tests of pure
236
crystalline model drugs were conducted in this study. Excessive amount of three drugs were dispersed
237
in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions, and samples were withdrawn in predetermined time points up to 72
238
hours. Dissolution results of ibuprofen were shown in Fig. 3. Despite the solubilizing effect by
239
EUDRAGIT® E PO, it still took 36 hours for all tested ibuprofen samples to reach the concentration
240
plateaus as seen in Fig.3. This suggested that the time period could be substantially long for the
241
solubilizing effect by EPO to reach the equilibrium. . In addition, it was also seen that the dissolution
242
rate of ibuprofen increased with increasing EPO concentrations in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions as
243
reflected by the slope of the dissolution curves before the plateau.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
220
244
Dissolution tests of felodipine and bifendate in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions also showed
245
concentration plateaus after certain time length as seen in Fig. 3. Compared with ibuprofen, the time
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT length after which the dissolution reached plateau was slightly shorter for felodipine and bifendate (Fig.
247
S1). For felodipine, it almost took 12 hours to reach the drug concentration plateaus for all samples,
248
and for bifendate, the time length for drug concentration plateau was circa 36 hours. Given the
249
generally required in vivo drug release rate or time length for conventional oral preparations, these
250
results suggested that the dissolution rate of pure crystalline drug was slow although the drugs could
251
eventually be solubilized by EUDRAGIT® E PO. Similarly to ibuprofen, the dissolution rates for both
252
drugs also increased with increasing EUDRAGIT® E PO concentrations in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl
253
solutions. The solubilized amount of drugs, however, varied significantly amongst the three drugs. For
254
instance, with the concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO at 15 mg/ml, the solubilized concentration of
255
ibuprofen could be as high as circa 800 µg/ml, whereas in the same EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution, the
256
solubilized concentrations for felodipine and bifendate were only circa 100 µg/ml and 10 µg/ml. When
257
comparing the equilibrated solubilities in pure 0.1 M HCl with the solubilized solubilities of each drug,
258
however, it was seen that felodipine was solubilized by the highest level amongst the three drugs. Such
259
discrepancy of solubilizing effects between different drugs may be attributed to reasons such as
260
interactions between the drug and polymer and the molecular dimension of the drug. Nevertheless,
261
EUDRAGIT® E PO exhibited strong ability of solubilizing poorly water soluble drugs.
262
3.3. Dissolution studies on amorphous solid dispersions by hot met extrusion
263
It has been reported that dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drugs from solid dispersions can be
264
significantly increased due to the state of drugs being molecularly dispersed and the hydrophilicity of
265
polymeric carriers [7]. Recrystallization during dissolution, however, was found in a few case studies
266
regarding solid dispersions whereby a reduction of drug concentration was clearly detected after certain
267
time length in dissolution test [23, 31]. This was because that the rapid dissolution of poorly water
268
soluble drugs can shortly create super-saturation of drugs in dissolution media, which can strongly
269
drive recrystallization for drug molecules, leading to precipitation of dissolved drugs.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
270
RI PT
246
In this study, the above results had already demonstrated that EUDRAGIT® E PO can solubilize
271
poorly water soluble drugs in 0.1 M HCl solution, and linear solubilizing relationship were observed
272
for all three model drugs. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that if the drug loading of solid dispersions
273
was within the solubilized concentration range, no recrystallization should be observed, and hence a
274
complete drug release should be achieved. The solubilized concentration range could be calculated
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 275
using the linear regression equation as listed in Fig. 2 for model drugs. Took ibuprofen for example,
276
and the linear equation was:
277
y = 0.0506x + 0.0457 where x was the concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO (mg/ml) in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution, and y
279
was the concentration of ibuprofen (mg/ml) in the same solution. As the volume for EUDRAGIT® E
280
PO and the drug was the same in the media, the equation can be used to estimate the amount of drugs
281
that can be solubilized by EUDRAGIT® E PO. For instance, given 100 mg EUDRAGIT® E PO, the
282
polymers may solubilize approximately 5.10 mg ibuprofen. Therefore, in dissolution, hot melt
283
extrudates of ibuprofen and EUDRAGIT® E PO with the drug loading of 4% w/w was just within the
284
solubilizing range and drug loading of 10% w/w was significantly beyond the solubilizing range. Drug
285
loadings of hot melt extrudates for different model drugs were designed based on this solubilizing
286
range. As seen in Fig. 4, ibuprofen hot melt extrudates with the drug loading of 4% w/w showed
287
complete drug release within 10 min, whereas progressive reduction of drug concentration was
288
observed for 10% w/w hot melt extrudates after 2 hours, indicating the occurrence of drug
289
recrystallization in the media. These results may suggest that for solid dispersions composed of
290
EUDRAGIT® E PO and poorly water soluble drugs, drug release rate can be significantly increased,
291
but the equilibrated drug concentration may be dependent on the solubilized concentration by
292
EUDRAGIT® E PO.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
278
Felodipine hot melt extrudates also showed similar dissolution performance. Felodipine solid
294
dispersions prepared by hot melt extrusion were designed with the drug loadings of 0.7% w/w (within
295
solubilizing range) and 1.5% w/w (beyond solubilizing range) as calculated by the above mentioned
296
method. Results of these two melt extrudates in 0.1 M HCl were shown in Fig. 4. It was seen that
297
drug loading just within the solubilizing range, complete drug release was observed within 15min and
298
no recrystallization was seen even after 24 hours, whereas extrudates with higher drug loading
299
exhibited drug precipitation after 2 hours. The dissolution rate, however, was still fast that over 90% of
300
the drug was released within 15min.
the
AC C
EP
293
301
For bifendate, the solubilizing value was too small, and therefore solid dispersions with such small
302
drug loading (circa 0.06% w/w) cannot be prepared precisely. Hot melt extrudates with the drug
303
loading of 1% w/w were prepared for the dissolution study to test whether or not recrystallization
304
would occur in the media. It can be seen in Fig. 4 that although complete drug release occurred within
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15 min, reduction of drug concentration was observed after 6 hours of dissolution test. This result again
306
suggested that when drug loading was above the solubilizing range of EUDRAGIT® E PO,
307
recrystallization would occur for amorphous solid dispersions of bifendate. Generally speaking, for
308
conventional oral preparations, drug molecules can hardly stay in the gastrointestinal tract for more
309
than 24 hours. Therefore such drug concentration reduction from the dissolution results may not affect
310
the in vivo therapeutic effect of drugs. Nonetheless, the dissolution studies of the melt extrudates with
311
drug loadings below and beyond the solubilizing range of EUDRAGIT® E PO demonstrated that the
312
EUDRAGIT® E PO concentration was a key factor to maintain the equilibrated drug concentration.
RI PT
305
Hot melt extrudates containing three model drugs for dissolution tests were all confirmed as
314
amorphous solid dispersions by X-Ray and DSC studies (data not shown). Despite the rapid drug
315
release rate, recrystallization still occurred in samples with drug loadings above the solubilizing ratios.
316
This indicated that in the case of EUDRAGIT® E PO based amorphous solid dispersions,
317
transformation of drugs and polymers into molecular dispersion (solid solution) may only increase the
318
dissolution rate, the equilibrated drug concentration, however, was dependent on the solubilizing ability
319
by EUDRAGIT® E PO. For typical poorly water soluble drugs, i.e. the model drugs in this study,
320
recrystallization force (super-saturation level) was extremely high, and hence the equilibrated drug
321
concentration in the media was very low. The complete drug release without recrystallization in the
322
dissolution, therefore, was maintained mainly by the solubilizing effect. The linear solubilizing
323
relationship for all three model drugs may indicate the possibility that EUDRAGIT® E PO might be
324
able to form micelles in 0.1 M HCl, and thus can solubilize poorly water soluble drugs.
325
3.4. Investigation into the formation of micelles by EUDRAGIT® E PO
326
In order to investigate the formation of micelles by EUDRAGIT® E PO, different technologies
327
including dynamic laser scattering, fluorescent probe and microscopy were applied. Theoretically, if
328
micelles could be formed in solution, nanometer scaled particles should be detected by dynamic laser
329
scattering. EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions with the concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO ranging from
330
1 mg/ml to 35 mg/ml were tested by dynamic laser scattering, and the results were shown in Fig. 5. It
331
can be seen that formed particles were detected in all EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions. It should be noted
332
that all the tested EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions were naturally clear solutions by naked eyes.
333
Therefore, it was likely that these detected particles might be micelles formed by EUDRAGIT® E PO.
334
In addition, it was found that particle size increased with increasing EUDRAGIT® E PO concentration.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
313
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 335
For instance, with the concentration below 15 mg/ml, the measured mean diameter was circa 10 nm.
336
When the concentration increased to 25 mg/ml and 35 mg/ml, the mean diameter was determined as
337
470 nm and 2000 nm, respectively. The particle size depending on the concentration of EUDRAGIT®
338
E PO may further suggest the formation of micelles, as such phenomenon had been commonly reported
339
in literature regarding surfactants forming micelles [32]. In addition, after saturated with the three model drugs, all the EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions were
341
still naturally clear solutions. The EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions containing drugs showed similar
342
particle size distribution to the drug-free EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions with corresponding
343
EUDRAGIT® E PO concentration (Fig. S2, Fig.S3 and Fig. S4). By increasing the concentration of
344
EUDRAGIT® E from 15 mg/ml to 25 mg/ml, the mean particle size of EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions
345
containing drugs also increased from ~10 nm to approximately 500 nm. These results indicated that the
346
drugs might be solubilized into the core of the EUDRAGIT® E PO micelles.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
340
Pyrene-based fluorescent probe had been widely used for the confirmation of the formation of
348
micelles and the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) [33, 34]. Pyrene was strongly
349
hydrophobic with the water solubility of circa 1×10-7 mol/L [35]. When being solubilized into the
350
micelle cores, the polarity of local environment of pyrene would be changed, from being hydrophilic to
351
being hydrophobic, which may lead to different emission spectrum under florescence [36]. It has been
352
reported that the emission spectrum at 337 nm and 334 nm were sensitive to the formation of micelles,
353
and thus these two wavelengths were normally used to determine the CMC of surfactants [35]. A series
354
of EUDRAGIT® E-HCl with the concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO ranging from 5 ×10-5 mg/L to 1
355
mg/L were prepared, and pyrene were added into these solutions as mentioned above. The fluorescence
356
spectrum was shown in Fig. 6A. It can be seen that with increased concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO
357
in solutions, the intensities at 337 nm (I337) and 334 nm (I334) substantially increased, indicating the
358
encapsulation of pyrene into micelles by EUDRAGIT® E PO. By further using the value of I337/I334, the
359
CMC value of EUDRAGIT® E PO can be calculated via the intersection of the regression analysis at
360
the two wavelengths as shown in Fig. 6B. The CMC value of EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl was
361
estimated as 0.99 µg/ml.
AC C
EP
TE D
347
362
Transmittance electron microscopy was also applied to confirm the existence of micelles by
363
EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl. EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution with the concentration of 2 mg/ml
364
was used for the TEM study. As seen in Fig. 7A, small particles with the size of circa 10 nm were
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT observed in the TEM graph (circled by black solid line). In addition, larger particles with the size over
366
100 nm were also observed (circled by red dash line in Fig. 7A). Such particle size distribution was in
367
agreement with the measured results by dynamic laser scattering as shown in Fig. 7B. Combined with
368
other results, these observed particles were highly likely to be micelles formed by EUDRAGIT® E PO.
369
As the concentration was significantly higher than the estimated CMC value of EUDRAGIT® E PO,
370
formed micelles showed increased particle size. The obtained results so far clearly showed the evidence
371
that EUDRAGIT® E PO could exhibit self-assemble behavior in acidic media and could be formed into
372
micelles to solubilize poorly water soluble drugs. In addition, with increasing concentration of
373
EUDRAGIT® E PO in acidic media, the particle size of micelles started to become larger, indicating
374
that complex structure of micelles may be formed. This was possibly because of further aggregation of
375
EUDRAGIT® E PO molecules at higher concentrations. The actual structure or the arrangement of
376
EUDRAGIT® E PO molecules within the micelles, however, was not yet clearly understood, and
377
should be further investigated in the future.
378
3.5. Mechanism of dissolution enhancement for poorly water soluble drugs by amorphous solid
379
dispersions containing Eudragit® E PO
380
In this paper, we investigated the solubilizing effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO on poorly water soluble
381
drugs in 0.1 M HCl solution, and tried to understand the dissolution mechanism of amorphous solid
382
dispersions containing EUDRAGIT® E PO. The results showed that EUDRAGIT® E PO can
383
significantly increase the equilibrium solubilities of ibuprofen, felodipine and bifendate in acidic
384
solutions, and the solubilizing effect was in a linear relationship with the concentrations of
385
EUDRAGIT® E PO. By further studies using dynamic laser scattering, fluorescent probe and TEM, it
386
was confirmed that micelles were formed in 0.1 M HCl solution, and the CMC value of EUDRAGIT®
387
E PO in the solution was estimated as 0.99 µg/ml. Consequently, the solubilizing effect of
388
EUDRAGIT® E PO could be understood that due to the formation of micelles, poorly water soluble
389
drugs may be encapsulated into the core the micelles. These results were consistent with the previous
390
research reported by Yoshida, et. al., in which tacrolimus-Eudragit® E solid dispersion could form nano
391
particles with particle size ranging from 10 nm to 369.8 nm [37]. The study by Yoshida, et. al. showed
392
that nanometer level structures existed. In this paper, it was confirmed that micelles were evidently
393
formed in 0.1 M HCl solution by EUDRAGIT® E PO.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
365
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT In the chemical structure of EUDRAGIT® E PO, it contained a tertiary amine group which would
395
be ionized in acidic media, making the molecule amphipathic as previously reported in the literature
396
[38]. Therefore it was likely that once the concentration of the amphipathic molecules was beyond a
397
certain value (the CMC value), self-assemble of the molecules would occur and hence micelles could
398
be formed, solubilizing poorly water soluble drugs. It should be noted that the solubilizing ability on
399
the model drugs were significantly different. For instance, the equilibrium solubility of felodipine was
400
increased by over 300 times, whereas in the same solution the equilibrium solubility of bifendate was
401
only increased by 12 times. This may be attributed to the reason that the properties of drugs, i.e.
402
polarity, hydrophobicity and molecule size, can affect the interactions with EUDRAGIT® E PO in
403
acidic solutions, hence resulting in different solubilizing effect on different drugs.
SC
RI PT
394
The confirmation of the formation of micelles by EUDRAGIT® E PO in acidic solutions may
405
further assist the understanding on the mechanism of dissolution of solid dispersions containing
406
EUDRAGIT® E PO. Dissolution results of hot melt extrudates composed of EUDRAGIT® E PO and
407
model drugs showed that when extrudates with drug loadings beyond the solubilizing range,
408
concentration reduction in drug release profile could be seen for all samples. In addition, the
409
equilibrated drug concentrations at the end of the dissolution tests were calculated to be similar to the
410
values by the solubilizing relationship. These results demonstrated that the steady state of drug release
411
was substantially dependent on the solubilizing effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO. Comparing the drug
412
release rate between hot melt extrudates and pure drugs (in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions), it can be
413
seen that drugs released significantly faster from solid dispersions than from intact drug crystals. Based
414
on these results, we proposed the dissolution mechanism of amorphous solid dispersions containing
415
EUDRAGIT® E PO as illustrated in Fig. 8. Original solid dispersions containing EUDRAGIT® E PO
416
were physically amorphous molecular dispersions in which drugs were dispersed in single molecule
417
amongst polymeric chains. During dissolution, due to the physical structure of solid dispersions, drug
418
molecules can rapidly dissolve in the media (0.1 M HCl). Meanwhile, micelles of EUDRAGIT® E PO
419
started to form as the concentration of the polymer was much higher than the CMC value of
420
EUDRAGIT® E PO. Subsequently, depending on the concentration of drug molecules in the media,
421
complete drug release or recrystallization would occur. If the drug concentration was within the
422
solubilizing range, drug molecules would totally be encapsulated in the micelles. In contrast, the
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
404
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 423
amount of drug molecules that were beyond the solubilizing range would precipitate after the initial
424
dissolution, leading to the observed concentration reduction of drugs. For amorphous solid dispersions containing EUDRAGIT® E PO, the transformation of drugs and
426
the polymer into solid solution may only increase the dissolution rate. The equilibrated drug
427
concentration, however, was dependent on the ratio of the drug to EUDRAGIT® E PO. In summary,
428
the mechanism of dissolution enhancement by amorphous solid dispersions containing EUDRAGIT® E
429
PO could be concluded as the combined contribution from both the physical structure of amorphous
430
solid dispersions and the solubilizing effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO. Results from this study manifested
431
that EUDRAGIT® E PO was useful for the preparation of amorphous solid dispersions. When
432
developing such formulations, however, it was necessary to test the equilibrated drug concentration in
433
the media containing EUDRAGIT® E PO to achieve a complete drug release profile. Additionally,
434
while applying other polymeric carriers for solid dispersions, it was suggested that drug to polymer
435
ratio should be screened not only from manufacturing process viewpoints, but also from the concern of
436
drug release performance.
437
4. Conclusion
438
In this paper, the mechanism of dissolution enhancement by amorphous solid dispersions containing
439
EUDRAGIT® E PO was investigated. It was found that EUDRAGIT® E PO can solubilize typical
440
poorly water soluble drugs in acidic solutions, and equilibrium solubilities of ibuprofen, felodipine and
441
bifendate could be increased by tens to hundreds folds. Such solubilizing effect was attributed to the
442
fact that EUDRAGIT® E PO could form micelles in 0.1 M HCl solution as confirmed by dynamic laser
443
scattering, fluorescent probe and TEM studies. The CMC value of EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl
444
was estimated as 0.99 µg/ml using pyrene-based fluorescent probe. By comparing the dissolution
445
results of hot melt extruded amorphous solid dispersions and the calculated solubilizing range of
446
EUDRAGIT® E PO to different drugs, it was showed that the equilibrated drug concentration in
447
dissolution was very close the solubilized drug concentration. Amorphous solid dispersions with drug
448
loadings beyond the solubilizing range presented drug recrystallization for all samples. In conclusion,
449
the dissolution enhancement for poorly water soluble drugs by EUDRAGIT® E PO based amorphous
450
solid dispersions in acidic media was contributed by both the physical structure of amorphous solid
451
dispersions and the solubilizing effect of EUDRAGIT® E PO.
452
Conflict of interest
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
425
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 453
The authors report no conflict of interest.
454
Acknowledgements
455
The authors would like to thank Dr Sheng Qi at University of East Anglia for the previous discussion. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers
457
81603059]; the “Jiangsu Shuangchuang” Program, and the Top-notch Academic Programs Project of
458
Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [grant numbers PPZY2015B146].
459
Supplementary material
460
The validation of HPLC method for ibuprofen and bifendate, the first 8 hours dissolution profiles of
461
three model drugs in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions with different EUDRAGIT® E PO concentrations
462
at 37 oC (Fig. S1), the particle size distribution of each EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution saturated with the
463
three model drugs (Fig. S2, Fig. S3 and Fig. S4), and the equilibrium solubilities of three model drugs
464
in each EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions (Table S1) were included in the Supplementary material.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
456
AC C
EP
TE D
465
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 466
References
467
[1]
468 469
C.A. Lipinski, Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability, J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Meth. 44 (2000) 235-249.
[2]
L. Deng, Y. Wang, T. Gong, X. Sun and
Z.R. Zhang, Dissolution and bioavailability
enhancement of alpha-Asarone by solid dispersions via oral administration, Drug Dev. Ind.
471
Pharm. 43 (2017) 1-38. [3]
473 474
T. Kathavarayan and
Y.J. Yoo, Enhanced Solubility of Piperine using Hydrophilic carrier
based Potent Solid Dispersion Systems, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 43 (2017) 1-32. [4]
N. Ogawa, T. Hiramatsu, R. Suzuki, R. Okamoto, K. Shibagaki, K. Fujita, C. Takahashi, Y.
SC
472
RI PT
470
475
Kawashima and
476
dispersion system by spray drying and hot-melt extrusion with using the amphiphilic
477
polyvinyl caprolactam-polyvinyl acetate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer and d-mannitol,
478
Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 111 (2017) 205-214. [5]
480 481
M AN U
479
H. Yamamoto, Improvement in the water solubility of drugs with a solid
T. Vasconcelos, S. Marques, J. das Neves and
B. Sarmento, Amorphous solid dispersions:
Rational selection of a manufacturing process, Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 100 (2016) 85-101. [6]
M. Stanković, H.W. Frijlink and
W.L.J. Hinrichs, Polymeric formulations for drug release
prepared by hot melt extrusion: application and characterization, Drug Discov. Today 20
483
(2015) 812-823. [7]
485 486
polymers, Int. J. Pharm. 231 (2002) 131-144. [8]
487
489 490
subsequent problems, and recent breakthroughs, J. Pharm. Sci. 88 (1999) 1058-1066. [9]
[10]
495
X. Dai, J.G. Moffat, J. Wood and
M. Reading, Thermal scanning probe microscopy in the
development of pharmaceuticals, Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 64 (2012) 449-460. [11]
493 494
L. Yu, Amorphous pharmaceutical solids: Preparation, characterization and stabilization, Adv.
Drug Deliver. Rev. 48 (2001) 27-42.
491 492
A.T.M. Serajuddin, Solid dispersion of poorly water-soluble drugs: Early promises,
AC C
488
D.Q.M. Craig, The mechanisms of drug release from solid dispersions in water-soluble
EP
484
TE D
482
T. Vasconcelos, B. Sarmento and
P. Costa, Solid dispersions as strategy to improve oral
bioavailability of poor water soluble drugs, Drug Discov. Today 12 (2007) 1068-1075. [12]
J. Thiry, M.G.M. Kok, L. Collard, A. Frère, F. Krier, M. Fillet and
B. Evrard, Bioavailability
enhancement of itraconazole-based solid dispersions produced by hot melt extrusion in the
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 496 497
framework of the three RS rule, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 99 (2017) 1-8. [13]
498 499
Y. Huang and
W. G. Dai, Fundamental aspects of solid dispersion technology for poorly
soluble drugs, Acta Pharm. Sin. B 4 (2014) 18-25. [14]
T. Xie, W. Gao and
L.S. Taylor, Impact of eudragit epo and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
on drug release rate, supersaturation, precipitation outcome and redissolution rate of
501
indomethacin amorphous solid dispersions, Int. J. Pharm. 531 (2017) 313-323.
502
[15]
RI PT
500
R.I. Moustafine, A.V. Bukhovets, A.Y. Sitenkov, V.A. Kemenova, P. Rombaut and
G. Van
503
den Mooter, Eudragit e po as a complementary material for designing oral drug delivery
504
systems
505
interpolyelectrolyte complexes with countercharged eudragit l100 copolymers, Mol. Pharm.
506
10 (2013) 2630-2641.
508 509
release
properties:
Comparative
evaluation
SC
[16]
controlled
C.N. Patra, R. Priya, S. Swain, G. Kumar Jena, K.C. Panigrahi and
M AN U
507
with
of
new
D. Ghose,
Pharmaceutical significance of eudragit: A review, J. Pharm. Sci. 3 (2017) 33-45. [17]
Z. Yang, K. Nollenberger, J. Albers, J. Moffat, D. Craig and
S. Qi, The effect of processing
510
on the surface physical stability of amorphous solid dispersions, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 88
511
(2014) 897-908. [18]
Z. Yang, K. Nollenberger, J. Albers, D. Craig and
TE D
512
S. Qi, Molecular indicators of surface and
513
bulk instability of hot melt extruded amorphous solid dispersions, Pharm. Res. 32 (2015)
514
1210-1228. [19]
S. Qi, A. Gryczke, P. Belton and
D.Q.M. Craig, Characterisation of solid dispersions of
EP
515
paracetamol and EUDRAGIT® E prepared by hot-melt extrusion using thermal, microthermal
517
and spectroscopic analysis, Int. J. Pharm. 354 (2008) 158-167.
518 519 520 521
AC C
516
[20]
S.L. Cantor, M.A. Khan and
A. Gupta, Development and optimization of taste-masked
orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) of clindamycin hydrochloride, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 41 (2015) 1156-1164.
[21]
Y.D. Yan, J.S. Woo, J.H. Kang, C.S. Yong and
H.-G. Choi, Preparation and evaluation of
522
taste-masked donepezil hydrochloride orally disintegrating tablets, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 33
523
(2010) 1364-1370.
524 525
[22]
J. Liu, F. Cao, C. Zhang and Q. Ping, Use of polymer combinations in the preparation of solid dispersions of a thermally unstable drug by hot-melt extrusion, Acta Pharm. Sin. B 3 (2013)
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 526 527
263-272. [23]
Z. Yang, K. Nollenberger, J. Albers, D. Craig and
S. Qi, Microstructure of an immiscible
528
polymer blend and its stabilization effect on amorphous solid dispersions, Mol. Pharm. 10
529
(2013) 2767-2780.
530
[24]
J. Li, I.W. Lee, G.H. Shin, X. Chen and
H.J. Park, Curcumin-eudragit® e po solid dispersion:
A simple and potent method to solve the problems of curcumin, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 94
532
(2015) 322-332.
533
[25]
RI PT
531
K. Higashi, K. Yamamoto, M.K. Pandey, K.H. Mroue, K. Moribe, K. Yamamoto and
A.
Ramamoorthy, Insights into atomic-level interaction between mefenamic acid and Eudragit
535
EPO in a supersaturated solution by high-resolution magic-angle spinning nmr spectroscopy,
536
Mol. Pharm. 11 (2014) 351-357. [26]
L. Hu, Q. Hu and N. Gao. A validated, stability-indicating HPLC method for the
M AN U
537
SC
534
538
determination of felodipine and its related substances, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 4 (2013)
539
3369-3374.
540
[27]
A. Gryczke, S. Schminke, M. Maniruzzaman, J. Beck and D. Douroumis, Development and evaluation of orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) containing Ibuprofen granules prepared by
542
hot melt extrusion, Colloid. Surface. B 86 (2011) 275-284.
543
[28]
TE D
541
Z. Yang, K. Nollenberger, J. Albers, D. Craig and S. Qi, Microstructure of an immiscible polymer blend and its stabilization effect on amorphous solid dispersions, Mol. Pharm. 10
545
(2013) 2767-2780.
546
[29]
547
549 550
bioavailability enhancement of bifendate solid dispersions prepared by hot-melt extrusion, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 38 (2012) 735-743.
[30]
A. Yekta, J. Duhamel, P. Brochard, H. Adiwidjaja and
M.A. Winnik, A fluorescent-probe
study of micelle-like cluster formation in aqueous-solutions of hydrophobically modified
551 552
J. Feng, L. Xu, R. Gao, Y. Luo and X. Tang, Evaluation of polymer carriers with regard to the
AC C
548
EP
544
poly(ethylene oxide), Macromolecules 26 (1993) 1829-1836. [31]
F. Jijun, X. Lishuang, W. Xiaoli, Z. Shu, T. Xiaoguang, Z. Xingna, H. Haibing and T. Xing,
553
Nimodipine (NM) tablets with high dissolution containing NM solid dispersions prepared by
554
hot-melt extrusion, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 37 (2011) 934-944.
555
[32]
R. Erhardt, M.F. Zhang, A. Boker, H. Zettl, C. Abetz, P. Frederik, G. Krausch, V. Abetz and
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 556
A.H.E. Muller, Amphiphilic janus micelles with polystyrene and poly(methacrylic acid)
557
hemispheres, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 3260-3267.
558
[33]
Y. Hu, V. Darcos, S. Monge, S. Li, Y. Zhou and
F. Su, Thermo-responsive release of
559
curcumin
560
p(nipaam-co-dmaam)-b-plla-b-p(nipaam-co-dmaam) triblock copolymers, Int. J. Pharm. 476
561
(2014) 31-40. [34]
micelles
prepared
J.S. Kim, H.J. Jeon, M.S. Park, Y.C. You and
by
self-assembly
of
amphiphilic
RI PT
562
from
J.H. Youk, Preparation of intermediary layer
crosslinked micelles from a photocrosslinkable amphiphilic abc triblock copolymer, Eur.
564
Polym. J. 45 (2009) 1918-1923.
565
[35]
G. Basu Ray, I. Chakraborty and
SC
563
S.P. Moulik, Pyrene absorption can be a convenient method
for probing critical micellar concentration (CMC) and indexing micellar polarity, J. Colloid
567
Interf. Sci. 294 (2006) 248-254.
568
[36]
569 570
L. Piñeiro, M. Novo and
M AN U
566
W. Al-Soufi, Fluorescence emission of pyrene in surfactant
solutions, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 215 (2015) 1-12. [37]
T. Yoshida, I. Kurimoto, K. Yoshihara, H. Umejima, N. Ito, S. Watanabe, K. Sako and
A.
Kikuchi, Aminoalkyl methacrylate copolymers for improving the solubility of tacrolimus. I:
572
Evaluation of solid dispersion formulations, Int. J. Pharm. 428 (2012) 18-24.
573
[38]
TE D
571
R.V. Alasino, S.F. Ausar, I.D. Bianco, L.F. Castagna, M. Contigiani and D.M. Beltramo Amphipathic and membrane-destabilizing properties of the cationic acrylate polymer
575
Eudragit® E100, Macromol. Biosci. 5 (2005) 207-213.
577
AC C
576
EP
574
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure captions
579
Fig. 1. The chemical structures of ibuprofen, felodipine and bifendate.
580
Fig. 2. Plot of the concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions against the
581
solubilized drug concentrations.
582
Fig. 3. Dissolution profiles of model drugs in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions with different
583
EUDRAGIT® E PO concentrations
584
(mean±SD, n=6).
585
Fig. 4. Dissolution profiles of drug-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudates with different drug
586
loadings in 0.1 M HCl at 37 oC: ibuprofen-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudates with drug loading of
587
4% (w/w) and 10% (w/w), felodipine-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudates with drug loading of 0.7%
588
(w/w) and 1.5% (w/w), bifendate-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudate with drug loading of 1%
589
(w/w). The dissolution profiles of first 2-hour dissolution test were scaled up and inserted in the right
590
of corresponding profiles (mean±SD, n=6).
591
Fig. 5.
592
concentrations (1 mg/ml, 2 mg/ml, 5 mg/ml, 15 mg/ml, 25 mg/ml and 35 mg/ml) by dynamic laser
593
scattering.
594
Fig. 6. Results of the determination of CMC for EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl by pyrene-based
595
fluorescence probe approach: A, fluorescence spectrum; B, plot of the intensity ratio (I337/I334) of the
596
pyrene excitation spectra vs. log concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO.
597
Fig. 7. TEM graph of EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution with the EUDRAGIT® E PO concentration of 2
598
mg/ml (A); particle size distribution of the same solution measured by dynamic laser scattering and
599
presented in “NICOMP Distribution” (B).
600
Fig. 8. Proposed mechanism of drug release from amorphous solid dispersions containing
601
EUDRAGIT® E PO.
RI PT
578
M AN U
SC
(0 mg/ml, 5 mg/ml, 15 mg/ml, 25 mg/ml and 35 mg/ml) at 37 oC
AC C
EP
TE D
Particle size distribution of EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions with different EUDRAGIT® E PO
22
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
Fig. 1. The chemical structures of ibuprofen, felodipine and bifendate.
1
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 2. Plot of the concentrations of EUDRAGIT® E PO in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions against the solubilized drug concentrations.
2
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 3. Dissolution profiles of model drugs in EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions with different
AC C
EP
(mean±SD, n=6).
(0 mg/ml, 5 mg/ml, 15 mg/ml, 25 mg/ml and 35 mg/ml) at 37 oC
TE D
EUDRAGIT® E PO concentrations
3
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 4. Dissolution profiles of drug-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudates with different drug loadings in 0.1 M HCl at 37 oC: ibuprofen-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudates with drug loading of 4% (w/w) and 10% (w/w), felodipine-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudates with drug loading of 0.7% (w/w) and 1.5% (w/w), bifendate-EUDRAGIT® E PO hot melt extrudate with drug loading of 1% (w/w). The dissolution profiles of first 2-hour dissolution test were scaled up and inserted in the right of corresponding profiles (mean±SD, n=6).
4
Particle size distribution of EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solutions with different EUDRAGIT® E PO
EP
Fig. 5.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
concentrations (1 mg/ml, 2 mg/ml, 5 mg/ml, 15 mg/ml, 25 mg/ml and 35 mg/ml) by dynamic laser
AC C
scattering.
5
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
EP
Fig. 6. Results of the determination of CMC for EUDRAGIT® E PO in 0.1 M HCl by pyrene-based fluorescence probe approach: A, fluorescence spectrum; B, plot of the intensity ratio (I337/I334) of the
AC C
pyrene excitation spectra vs. log concentration of EUDRAGIT® E PO.
6
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
Fig. 7. TEM graph of EUDRAGIT® E-HCl solution with the EUDRAGIT® E PO concentration of 2 mg/ml (A); particle size distribution of the same solution measured by dynamic laser scattering and
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
presented in “NICOMP Distribution” (B).
7
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
Fig. 8. Proposed mechanism of drug release from amorphous solid dispersions containing
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
EUDRAGIT® E PO.
8