Journal Pre-proof Unique rheological behavior of detonation nanodiamond hydrosols: The nature of solgel transition Nikita M. Kuznetsov, Sergey I. Belousov, Artem V. Bakirov, Sergei N. Chvalun, Roman A. Kamyshinsky, Alexey A. Mikhutkin, Alexander L. Vasiliev, Peter M. Tolstoy, Anton S. Mazur, Eugeny D. Eidelman, Elena B. Yudina, Alexander Ya Vul PII:
S0008-6223(20)30061-0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.054
Reference:
CARBON 14989
To appear in:
Carbon
Received Date: 31 October 2019 Revised Date:
15 January 2020
Accepted Date: 17 January 2020
Please cite this article as: N.M. Kuznetsov, S.I. Belousov, A.V. Bakirov, S.N. Chvalun, R.A. Kamyshinsky, A.A. Mikhutkin, A.L. Vasiliev, P.M. Tolstoy, A.S. Mazur, E.D. Eidelman, E.B. Yudina, A.Y. Vul, Unique rheological behavior of detonation nanodiamond hydrosols: The nature of sol-gel transition, Carbon (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.054. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1
Unique rheological behavior of detonation
2
nanodiamond hydrosols: the nature of sol-gel
3
transition
4
Nikita M. Kuznetsov 1,*, Sergey I. Belousov 1, Artem V. Bakirov 1,2, Sergei N. Chvalun 1,2, Roman
5
A. Kamyshinsky
6
Anton S. Mazur 5, Eugeny D. Eidelman 6,7, Elena B. Yudina 6, Alexander Ya. Vul' 6,**
7
1
National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia
8
2
Enikolopov Institute of Synthetic Polymeric Materials of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
9
Moscow, Russia
1,3,4
, Alexey A. Mikhutkin 1, Alexander L. Vasiliev
1,3,4
, Peter M. Tolstoy 5,
10
3
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region, Russia
11
4
Federal Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics” of Russian Academy of Science,
12
Moscow, Russia
13
5
Center for Magnetic Resonance, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
14
6
Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
15
7
St. Petersburg State Chemical Pharmaceutical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
16
KEYWORDS: detonation nanodiamond; sol-gel transition; rheological properties; thixotropy;
17
percolation threshold; hysteresis of viscosity
18
19
ABSTRACT: The paper describes the data on unusual rheological properties of detonation
20
nanodiamonds (DND) hydrosols and presents the fractal model explaining such behavior. The
21
hydrosols of DND with particles size of 4–5 nm and concentration range of 1.1–7.3 wt% with
1
1
negative (ζ < 0) and positive (ζ > 0) electrokinetic potentials have been studied by rotational
2
viscometry, small-angle X-ray scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance and Cryo Electron
3
Tomography. Remarkable hysteresis of viscosity and thixotropic effect demonstrate the sol-gel
4
transition at very low concentrations of the DND: 4–5 wt% for ζ >0 and 5–6 wt% for ζ <0. The
5
transition is accompanied by increase of loss (viscosity) modulus by two orders of magnitude
6
and the storage (elasticity) modulus started to be detected also. The experimental results have
7
been explained in the frame of percolation theory based on the network formation due to faceted
8
DND particles interactions.
9
INTRODUCTION
10
In recent years much more attention has been focused on various applications of
11
nanodiamonds obtained by detonation synthesis of carbon-containing explosives [1–4]. However,
12
the agglomeration of the detonation nanodiamond (DND), prepared by explosive method is the
13
serious drawback for their usage. Ball milling can partly solve this problem [5], but it has serious
14
disadvantage due to DND's surface graphitization [6]. Recently a new method of
15
deagglomeration excluding mechanical grinding has been developed [7–9] based on annealing
16
and subsequent centrifugation. As a result stable hydrosols of faceted DND particles with
17
averaged size of 4–5 nm have been produced. The stability of such hydrosols is determined by
18
non-spherical distribution of electrical potential around DND particles [10,11]. It would be
19
useful to mention that the sol-gel transition is also detected in the case of ball milling
20
deagglomeration method [12], but at higher concentration. The reason is formation of sp2 layer
21
on the surface of DND particles, which probably screened electrostatic interaction.
22
The rheological study of DND hydrosols is of great importance for numerous possible
23
applications in biomedicine [13], development of novel liquid heat carriers [14,15] and magnetic
24
liquids [16].
25
The DND hydrosol was prepared by a method described previously [9]. Two unusual
26
rheological features of DND hydrosols have been recently discovered: the sharp increase in
27
viscosity and the phase sol-gel transition at a relatively low filler concentration [11]. Such
28
behavior has been explained in the frame of the model based on network formation from the
29
chains of faceted DND particles due to electrostatic interaction of facets [10]. The network
30
formation can be detected by rotational viscometry, which is sensitive to changes in the
2
1
composition of a dispersed system and often used for characterization of suspensions filled by
2
various particles [17,18]. In measurements by rotational viscometer the critical value of shear
3
stress is determined by equality of shear energy and electrostatic interaction between the
4
particles within a chain.
5
It is worth to note, that in previous studies the viscosity was measured by other methods:
6
capillary [19], vibration [11] and rotation viscometry [20], only the last one allows to detect a
7
value of the shear stress as well as hysteresis at the thixotropic effect.
8
Moreover, based on rotational viscometry measurements the yield stress in DND
9
hydrosols even at low fillings [20] along with the sol-gel transition was observed. However,
10
some issues on the nature of the transition, the response of suspensions to the shear stress and
11
recovery processes of rheological characteristics in time were beyond the scope of these studies.
12
In particular, it would be important to obtain a direct experimental evidence of existence
13
of chains of DND particles in sol and formation of a network from the chains at the sol-gel
14
transition.
15
recovering of the network. Such direct observation of the network formation has been
16
successfully fulfilled by high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), at the same
17
time the process of the network modification by a three interval thixotropic test and
18
demonstration of a hysteresis effect at sol-gel transition.
It would be also useful to reveal experimentally a process of breakdown and
19
The understanding of these processes is especially important for practical applications
20
and can be revealed only by a detailed rheological study of the viscoelastic properties of
21
hydrosols, which also allows to suggest and confirm the corresponding models [10].
22
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
23
Let us consider rheological behavior of hydrosols. First of all rheological properties of
24
DND hydrosols were studied in shear mode recording flow and viscosity curves. Fig. 1 shows
25
the flow (a) and the viscosity (b) curves at different concentrations of DND with negative ζ-
26
potential obtained in the CSR regime.
27
As can be seen the hydrosol with a negative ζ-potential exhibits Newtonian behavior at
28
concentration lower than 5 wt% – the shear stress (τ) changes linearly with shear rate (γ)
29
increasing (Fig. 1a). At the same time, the viscosity curves show a constant value over a wide
30
range of studied shear rates (Fig. 1b). When the concentration increased higher than 5 wt%, the
3
1
behavior of the DND hydrosols dramatically changes. The flow curves presented in Fig. 1a
2
demonstrate the appearance of yield stress. What is more, the magnitude of stress increases
3
sharply with particle concentration in the hydrosol. According to the theory of sol-gel transition
4
formation of a network is the necessary condition [21]. Similar network can be easily formed in
5
the case of the elongated particles similar to V2O5 [22]. The concentration of DND particles at
6
the sol-gel transition is 5-6 wt% corresponds to about 1.5-2.0 vol%. The unusual effect which
7
attracted our attention is the network formation from the DND particles which do not have
8
elongated form (the aspect ratio is closed to one). The behavior of the DND hydrosol at such
9
concentrations is similar to a solid (elastic) body, in fact, the sol-gel transition is observed [11].
10
It should be emphasized that the viscosity curves at high concentrations decreases linearly
11
with shear rate (Fig. 1b). Such behavior of hydrosols also indicates a phase sol-gel transition.
12
Viscosity values increase with the concentration of diamond nanoparticles in hydrosol. The
13
graphs in Fig. 1 demonstrate transitions from elastic deformation and resistance typical for solids
14
to a viscous flow specific for liquids [23].
15
A similar dependence is observed for samples of DND hydrosols with a positive ζ-
16
potential (Fig. 1c,d). The main difference is in that the yield stress is observed for hydrosols
17
even at low concentrations of less than 1 wt% (Fig. 1c). The contribution of the elastic
18
component becomes more significant with increasing of concentration. The values of the yield
19
stress increase substantially with filler concentration. Viscosity curves show similar behavior to
20
hydrosols with negative ζ-potential at high concentrations (Fig. 1d).
21
As one can see from Fig. 1d at concentrations less than 5 wt% viscosity decreases with
22
shear rate and reach the plateau at high shear rate, exhibiting Newtonian behavior after the
23
structure destroying (τ = η ). The viscosity leveling occurs at shear rate values of 4–5 s-1 at
24
concentrations of DND c = 1; 2 and 4 wt%. It is noteworthy that this dependence is violated for
25
hydrosols at concentration less than 1 wt%. =
26 27
where
≤
≥
ν ν
– Newtonian viscosity,
≈ 4.5
≈ 4.5 ν–
.
;
(1)
critical shear rate.
28
The decrease in viscosity with shear rate corresponds to the part of the flow curve before
29
yield stress. The sample in these conditions is under elastic (reversible) deformation. After
4
1
overcoming the yield stress, a Newtonian flow of hydrosol with a constant viscosity is observed.
2
It should be noted that the viscosity values increase with the number of DND particles in the
3
hydrosol.
4
The DND electrokinetic potential affects the sol-gel transition of hydrosols. If ζ-potential
5
of DND particles is negative, then in the double layer protons H+ dominate. In case of particles
6
with positive ζ-potential, the hydroxyl ions ОН– predominate in double layer. Along with the
7
same potential value, the double layer formed by the protons should have a larger thickness
8
because of the difference in the effective diameters of the Н+ and ОН– ions. Thus, the effective
9
particle size with the double electrical layer surrounding it is higher in the hydrosol with a
10
positive potential. Obviously, that at the same concentration, the viscosity in the hydrosol with
11
positive ζ-potential should be higher, and the sol-gel transition in such sols occurs at lower
12
concentrations (compare Fig. 1b and Fig. 1d).
13
Indeed, a transition from viscous behavior to elastic (sol-gel transition) for DND
14
hydrosols with a positive ζ-potential observed at concentrations above 5 wt%, sol is viscoelastic
15
fluid, although the yield stress is not high. Meanwhile, hydrosols with negative ζ-potential at 5
16
wt% exhibit Newtonian behavior, proving the difference between hydrosols filled with particles
17
of various ζ-potential.
18
The different rheological behavior of DND hydrosols with opposite ζ-potential are also
19
manifested by frequency dependencies of storage and loss moduli. Preliminary amplitude tests
20
were performed in the oscillation mode at a low frequency of 10 s-1 to determine the strain
21
magnitude for frequency tests. According to obtained results, a deformation value of 0.1% was
22
chosen for further frequency experiments. This value is in the linear range of viscoelastic
23
properties for all samples.
24
The frequency dependences of storage G′ and loss G″ moduli for hydrosols and hydrogels
25
with opposite signs of ζ-potential at various concentrations are presented in Fig. S1. For DND
26
hydrosols with a negative ζ-potential (Fig. S1a) and up to 5 wt% particle concentration, only the
27
loss modulus is detected, whose values increase with frequency. Samples reveal viscous
28
behavior. With further increase of concentration, the storage modulus is also detected and
29
exceeds the loss modulus over the whole investigated frequency range. The values of both
30
modules increase with concentration and weakly depend on the frequency. Thus, with the
5
1
increase in concentration a denser network of DND particles is formed and the samples reveal
2
elastic behavior.
3
For DND hydrosols with a positive ζ-potential (Fig. S1b), the storage modulus is
4
detected even at low concentrations and at low frequencies. The value is higher than the loss
5
modulus and the yield stress is observed pointing to a weak network of interacting particles
6
formation even at such low concentrations. The loss modulus increases with frequency and the
7
storage modulus ceases to be detected. Thus, samples with a positive ζ-potential also reveal
8
viscous behavior at high frequency. At a concentration of 5 wt% the hydrosol exhibits a
9
viscoelastic behavior. Both moduli increase with frequency and the cross over point is observed
10
at the low frequency. With a further increase in concentration, the storage modulus exceeds the
11
loss modulus over the studied frequency range. Their values do not change with frequency and
12
increase with concentration.
13
Samples with various concentrations have different values of G′′ and different
14
dependence on frequency. It can be seen that modulus for hydrosols at low concentrations
15
(before sol-gel transition) demonstrate very similar dependences on frequency ω. Regardless of
16
the sign of the zeta potential, the values of the moduli change weakly at low frequencies and
17
increase at a frequency higher than 4 s-1. The observed dependences confirm the results obtained
18
in shear experiments and already mentioned above – the presence of yield stress and increase in
19
their values.
20
It is well known, that the thixotropic effect is a clear manifistation of the sol-gel
21
transition. Shear stress can destroy the DND particle network in gel and transform the gel into a
22
sol [24]. The clear thixotropic effect is shown in Fig. 2. Thixotropic behavior for samples up to 5
23
wt% DND content regardless of the ζ-potential sign cannot be detected. Up to such critical
24
concentration only properties specific for sols are observed.
25
The samples reveal pronounced thixotropic properties at higher concentrations. The
26
processes of viscosity recovery in time are shown on the graphs of the three-interval thixotropic
27
tests (3ITT, see Fig. 2a,b). Three regions can be distinguished on the graphs. The first is
28
measured at low shear rate (1 s-1) and characterizes the initial state of the sample. The second
29
interval is measured at high shear rate (200 s-1) and results in breakdown of the gel structure. In
30
the third region, and at a low shear rate (1 s-1), the structure restoring in time is observed. One
31
can see a sharp decrease in the viscosity of the samples in the second interval with subsequent
6
1
recovery. It is important to note that recovery does not occur instantly. The value of viscosity just
2
after 3ITT is lower than it was before the test (Fig. 2). Such results indicate that a sol-gel
3
transition occurred and the hydrosols at high concentrations of DND become jelly.
4
It is also interesting to note that sols with positive ζ-potential tend to recover their
5
structure much longer. Based on the proposed model the mechanism for break and recovering of
6
the gel is connected to network DNDs chains reorganization. One may suggest that at the 3ITT
7
the incomplete network destruction occurs resulting in remaining of small chains of several DND
8
particles. It is obvious that recovery of the gel network from the small chains requires time. It
9
can explain why the viscosity does not recover immediately after destruction of the network at
10
the third stage of the 3ITT.
11
It is well known that testing of thixotropy properties is a difficult task, because the
12
structure of the sample under study may be crashed during its loading into the measuring cell.
13
However, the measurements show good reproducibility.
14
We found that the recovery process does not depend on the concentration in the studied
15
range. Table S2 presents quantitative results: the degree of structure recovery over time. For
16
hydrosols with negative ζ-potential at 6.9 wt% filler content the recovery process goes faster
17
than at a concentration of 5.9 wt%. Finally, in all samples the viscosity values return to initial
18
level over time and the structure restores.
19
Another thixotropic test is the measurement of hysteresis loop (Fig. 3). It can be expected
20
that the hysteresis loops cannot be observed in hydrosols with the DND concentrations less than
21
5 wt% independently on ζ-potentials sign. It was confirmed experimentally as well as the results
22
of 3ITT. Increase in the hydrosols’ concentration leads to the hysteresis loop, whereas its area
23
depends on the concentration and ζ-potential sign (Fig. 3). With increase in the concentration,
24
the hysteresis loop area also increases.
25 26 27
The hydrosol density at given concentration allows to estimate the energy of the network per particle using the value of area under curve [25]: !"
=
#∗% &
(2)
28
here A – area, Pa/s; V – volume, ml; N – number of particles. The number of particles in solution
29
can be estimated in the spherical approximation, taking into account the density of a DND
30
particle of 3.5 g/cm3 [26] (traditionally taken as density of a bulk diamond) and concentration.
7
1
The calculated parameter has the power dimension '
&∗( )
*
= )+ and corresponds to the
2
energy that must be spent during shear to break the contact between individual particles or DND
3
chains in the hydrosol structure. The results are shown in Table 1. There is an obvious increase
4
in strength of gel network structure with concentration of DND particles with both positive and
5
negative ζ potential. The approximation allows to compare the energy needed to destroy
6
hydrogel structure. It is clearly seen that even at high shear rate (100 s-1) the energy values are
7
almost several orders of magnitude higher than thermal energy (kT).
8
Thus, DND hydrosols exhibit unique rheological behavior, in particular, sol – gel transition
9
and demonstrate the yield stress and hysteresis at extremely low concentrations. It is important
10
that hydrosols exhibit qualitatively similar, but quantitatively quite different rheological
11
properties depending on the ζ-potential of DNDs. To understood such behavior and identify the
12
reasons and nature of this phenomena, detailed structural studies were carried out.
13
First of all, the origin of DNDs particles ζ-potential different sign was studied by 13С solid-
14
state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The various types of functional groups prevailing on
15
the surface of DND particles with different sign of the ζ-potential was established (Fig. S3). It
16
can be seen in Fig. S3, that the COH groups on the particle surfaces are present only in the
17
hydrosol with a negative ζ-potential, and on particles with ζ are completely absent. On the other
18
hand, the CH and CH2 groups are specific just for the surface of particles with a positive ζ-
19
potential.
20
DND hydrosols structure was investigated by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The
21
samples regardless of the ζ-potential sign shows typical two-level organization, corresponding to
22
a loose aggregate with fractal dimension of 2.3 and a compact DND particle, surface fractal with
23
dimension 1.7 [20]. That was also confirmed previously by light [27] and neutron scattering [28].
24
The particle size distributions obtained from SAXS data reveal that the most of DND particles in
25
hydrosols has an average size of d = 5 nm, however there are a low number of larger structures
26
with sizes up to 50 nm (Fig. S4). This corresponds to the proposed model, according to which
27
particle chains are present in the DND hydrosol along with 4–5 nm particles.
28
Surprisingly, the expansion of the X-ray measurement range to smaller angles down to
29
0.04 nm-1 allows us to observe the Bragg peaks corresponding to scattering on an ordered
30
structure of fractals. Scattering curves for suspensions with negative ζ-potential are shown in
8
1
Fig. 4a as example. The peak is observed even at a concentration of 1 wt%, although it is rather
2
weak and manifests itself as a shoulder. Kratky plot shows the second order of scattering,
3
indicating the scattering on the structure rather than a form factor of particles (Fig. 4b). The
4
position of maximum changes and the interplanar distances (d = 2π/q) decrease with
5
concentration of DNDs in hydrosols. Thus, the formation of denser DND particles network
6
during the gel structure organization is observed (Table 2).
7
At the same time, the interplanar distance reaches a constant value at a concentration of
8
4.1 wt% for suspensions of DNDs with positive ζ-potential. For suspensions with a negative ζ-
9
potential, a decrease in the distance up to concentration of 6.9 wt% is observed. It should be
10
noted that the reliable determination of the distance between the scattering centers in 1.0 wt%
11
DND hydrosol is difficult. This fact may indicate the formation of longer chains in the case of
12
samples with a positive ζ-potential, which correlates with the rheology data.
13
To verify the proposed models Cryo transmission electron microscopy (CryoTEM) and
14
Cryo-Electron Tomography (CET) studies were carried out. The measurement procedure in cryo
15
mode allows to observe the native structure of the sample. Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show the cryoTEM
16
image and the results of CET for 1 wt% of DND hydrosols with a different sign of ζ-potential.
17
The figures clearly demonstrate the formation of extended fractal structures and chains
18
formed by individual faceted DND particles. It is obvious that DNDs with a negative ζ-potential
19
form a fractal structure by a smaller number of particles in contrast with a positive ζ-potential
20
DNDs. In the latter case, tomography data demonstrate the formation of a percolation network
21
(Fig. 6b,c). This explains the differences in the rheological behavior at low concentrations of
22
samples with different sign of ζ-potential. The fractal dimensions estimated from the CET data
23
are of the order of 2.2, which is in good correlation with the SAXS data for the fractal dimension
24
of a DND cluster [20]. Moreover, interparticle distance distribution (insets Figs. 5a and 6a)
25
show, that the secondary maximum position qualitatively matches the interplanar distance
26
between fractals at 1 wt% contain of DND particles in hydrosol measured by SAXS (see
27
Table 2).
28 29
It is important to note that such structures are permanently dynamically rearranged, otherwise aggregation and sedimentation of particles should be observed.
30
Let's estimate the value of shear stress for chains destruction considering the model [11]
31
based on application of DLVO theory to nanoparticles with non-spherical electric potential.
9
1
According to the DLVO theory [21] stability of sols is determined by a balance between
2
attracting forces and repulsive forces. The latter is consequence of interaction of electrical double
3
layers surrounding every particle. The suggested shape of free DND particles is truncated
4
octahedron and as a result the particles in sol, possess a spherically non-symmetric potential [10].
5
Thus, the electrical double layer around every particle is not spherical also [11,20]. The
6
asymmetry of the potential changes the interaction parameters between DND particles.
7
Eventually, this change leads to formation of the chains and increase in hydrosols viscosity.
8
Consequently, the sol-gel transition in such hydrosols may takes place at low concentration of
9
the particles due to formation of a network.
10
Let us make some estimates. An individual DND particle can be described as a multipole.
11
However, such description is a non-trivial task since it is not clear what type of multipole
12
(dipole, quadrupole, etc.) most adequately corresponds to the interaction of real DND particles.
13
Therefore, in a rough estimate, it is possible to consider the DND particles as point charges.
14
Let’s compare energy of electrostatic interaction between two particles in a chain and the energy
15
that is required for motion of the chain as a whole with a given angle velocity. DND particles are
16
considered to be polyhedral. Using known electrokinetic potential values of | ζ | = 40–50 mV [8]
17
one is able to calculate electric charge of a particle Q ≈ 2.0·10-18 C. The Q value has been
18
derived from Coulomb low based on the absolute value of electrokinetic potential, distance
19
between particle and slipping plane (3 – 4 nm) and dielectric constant of water.
20
Note, the crystallographic facets having different indexes, (100) and (111), have opposite
21
signs and values of charge. As consequence, water double layer surrounding the particle in
22
hydrosol is non-symmetric [11].
23
Estimation of energy of electrostatic interaction between the particles allows to determine
24
the distance between particles’ centers to be h = 6 nm, it means that inter-particle distance in
25
chains is very short. Moreover, skeleton analysis of the CET data showed that a continuous
26
percolation network from DNDs with positive ζ-potential forms at a distance between particles
27
of 2.3 nm. The energy required for motion of chain as a whole with angle velocity ≈ 4.5 s-1 is
28
turned out to be an order of the electrostatic interaction energy. Angular velocity of the chains
29
corresponds to shear rate. Therefore, at the shear rate of ≈ 4.5 s-1 the chains should be broken.
30 31
Taking into account the values of viscosity and yield stress we can estimate the energy required for destruction of the chains into free diamond particles [20].
10
1 2 3
Let’s to compare the force causing shearing of DND particles Fsh with electric interaction force Fe: Fsh = 3πτδd
(3)
4
where δ = 1 mm is gap between two cylinders in the rotational viscometer, τ – shear stress, d –
5
diameter of DND particle.
6
Fe = Qζ/h
(4)
7
These two forces will be equal to each other in the case at τ ≈ τ0 corresponding to the
8
concentration of 5 wt% (Fig. 1). At smaller shear stress τ ≤ τ0, electric interaction forces forming
9
the chains dominate. If τ ≥ τ0, the Stokes forces causing the shearing dominate, and thus the
10
chains will be destructed. Note, here and above we base on concepts considering the chain
11
formation from spherically non-symmetric DND particles sized 4–5 nm.
12
Thus, simple estimate shows, that due to the non-sphericity of DND particle ζ-potential,
13
chains are formed, which in turn are organized into fractal structures with dimension of 2.2. Such
14
organization results in the formation of a percolation continuous cluster at very low
15
concentrations.
16 17
CONCLUSION
18
This paper describes for the first time rheological properties of hydrosols consisting of
19
diamond nanoparticles sized 4–5 nm with positive and negative electrokinetic potentials in a
20
wide concentration range (1.1–7.3 wt%). The hydrosols were characterized by SAXS, NMR,
21
TEM and CET. Rheological properties were investigated by rotational viscometry. Sufficient
22
distinction in behavior of hydrosols with negative and positive electrokinetic potentials have
23
been observed. The thixotropic effect and the sol-gel transition were revealed at concentrations
24
of DND particles in hydrosol lower than 6 wt%. Viscosity hysteresis occurring under increasing
25
and subsequent decreasing shear stress is revealed for the first time.
26
The analysis of obtained results allows to explain observed features of the rheological
27
behavior associated with non-sphericity of DND’s electrical double layer leading to the chain
28
formation. The explanation is based on application of the general concepts of DLVO theory to
29
nanoparticles with non-spherical electric potential. The SAXS, cryoTEM and CET data confirm
30
the proposed model.
31
11
1
MATERIALS AND METHODS
2
The study was focused on two types of DND hydrosols with positive and negative
3
electrokinetic ζ-potential in the concentration range from 1.0 to 7.0 wt% corresponding to about
4
1.5-2.0 vol%. The DND hydrosols with positive and negative ζ potentials were produced by the
5
method similar to described in our previous papers [9]. ζ potentials depends on atmosphere in
6
which DND powders are annealed. Molecular hydrogen and air are used for obtaining DND with
7
positive and negative ζ-potential, respectively. ζ-potential is determined from electrophoretic
8
mobility measurements using the Henry equation with the Smoluchowski approximation. The
9
measurements are performed by ZetaSizer ZS (Malvern Instruments). Purification of industrial
10
DND powder was carried out by oxidation process to remove the non-diamond carbon and by
11
subsequent etching in HF and KOH with multiple washing in purified water, by centrifugation
12
and drying in air. The samples with positive and negative potentials were made by annealing in
13
hydrogen and air. Sonication and centrifugation resulted in DND hydrosols consisted of
14
primarily particles ranging of 4-5 nm. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis suggested that metal
15
impurities in samples did not exceed 0.4 wt %
16
The negative charge is reported to be a result of dissociation of surface carboxyl groups in
17
aqueous media: DND-COOH + H2O ↔ DND-COO‾ + H3O+. It was repeatedly confirmed
18
experimentally [29–32].
19
The issue on the origin of the positive charge remains to be controversial [33]. One can
20
only say that annealing in hydrogen atmosphere and vacuum results in positive electrokinetic
21
potential. In our case heat treatment in hydrogen atmosphere was used as it was described in [9].
22
The types of surface functional groups determining the sign of DND particles ζ-potential,
23
were analyzed for by solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy. NMR measurements were conducted at
24
the Center for Magnetic Resonance (St. Petersburg State University Research Park) on a Bruker
25
Avance III 400WB spectrometer (100.64 MHz for 13C) equipped with an MAS probe. Samples
26
were placed in 4 mm zirconium oxide rotors and spun at 12.5 kHz. Chemical shifts were
27
calibrated using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an external standard. One-pulse MAS measurements
28
were performed using 3.8 µs pulses and 90 s relaxation delays. For cross-polarization (CP) MAS
29
measurements the contact time was 5 ms and relaxation delay was 10 s. Number of scans was
30
320 for one-pulse MAS and 4096 for CP MAS experiments.
12
1
Rheological properties were measured by Anton Paar Physica MCR 501 rheometer, its
2
measuring system consists of two coaxial cylinders (measuring cell CC-27 E). The cell volume is
3
20 ml, the gap is 1 mm. All samples before measurements were kept for several minutes in the
4
cell to avoid phenomena related with possible structural changes. The measurements were
5
carried out at various regimes: in control shear rate (CSR) mode providing the flow and viscosity
6
curves, in three interval thixotropy test (3ITT) and hysteresis loop modes and also in oscillation
7
mode – amplitude tests (AS) to determine linear-viscoelastic (LVE) region and frequency tests
8
(FS) for storage, loss moduli. All data were obtained in automatic mode at a temperature of 20°C
9
after thermostating. The data were processed using a computer program package of the
10
instrument Rheoplus 3.40.
11
Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data were recorded on BioMur station of Kurchatov
12
synchrotron radiation source, the used wavelength was λ = 1.445 Å, and the 2 detector Dectris
13
Pilatus 1M. Hydrosols were examined in X-ray capillaries Hilgenberg diameter 1.5 mm, wall
14
thickness of the capillary was 10 µm. Exposure time was 180 s. Silver behenate (d001 = 58.8 Å)
15
was used for reference. The processing of the small-angle X-ray scattering results was performed
16
using a computer program package ATSAS [34]. The fractal dimensions was evaluated from
17
scattering curves in log-log scale [35,36].
18
The spatial distribution of DNDs was revealed by Cryo-Electron Tomography (CET). The
19
portion of hydrosol (3 µl) were applied to the glow discharged (30 s, 25 mA) lacey carbon EM
20
grid, blotted for 1.5 s and then plunge-freezed into a liquid ethane cooled by liquid nitrogen in
21
Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). This procedure results in the formation of a
22
thin layer of vetrified liquid with DNDs. CET study was carried out with Titan Krios 60-300
23
TEM/STEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) CryoEM, equipped with direct electron detector
24
Falcon II (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and Cs image corrector (CEOS, Germany), at
25
accelerating voltage of 300 kV. Datasets consisted of 61 images of the sample tilted within the
26
range of -60° to 60° with the step increment of 2°. Tilt series were collected automatically using
27
FEI Tomography software in low-dose mode (to prevent crystallization of liquid) at 18000x
28
magnification with the defocus of ~3 µm. Cross-correlation alignment and tomography
29
restoration by simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT) were performed with
30
Inspect3D (FEI, USA) software. For further 3D processing and reconstruction of DNDs surface
31
from binary images, Avizo (FEI, USA) software was used. The processed data was binarized by
13
1
the automatic entropy segmentation method [37,38] and surface models of DNDs were
2
generated. The obtained binary data arrays and surface models were then utilized for numerical
3
analysis. The 2D (separate stack images) and 3D (volumetric data) fractal dimensions were
4
calculated for the mass fractal and surface fractality. The distances between DNDs were
5
estimated after the 3D reconstruction of the specimen volume with the size of 1920 x 1781 x
6
216 pixel3 (737,3 x 683,9 x 82,9 nm3), In order to do the estimation, the space between
7
DNDs were split to a set of parallel equally spread three dimensions rods with the thickness
8
of the 1x1 pixel and with a 3 pixels (1.15 nm) distance between the rods. Thus, the period
9
was four pixels, which is 1.54 nm and that is less than DND dimensions. The lengths of the
10
lines between particles were evaluated and the distribution of distances between DNDs were
11
obtained. More details on this method can be found in [39].
12
14
1
FIGURES
Figure 1. Flow (a,c) and viscosity (b,d) curves of hydrosols filled by DND with negative (a,b) and positive (c,d) ζ-potential at various concentrations obtained by control shear rate mode. 2 3
15
Figure 2. The three-interval thixotropic test: (a) – for negative ζ-potential, (b) – for positive ζ1 2
potential. Viscosity as function of time for DND hydrosols.
Figure 3. Hysteresis loop for DND hydrosols with negative (6.9 wt%) and positive (7.3 wt%) ζ-potential. 3
16
Figure 4. (a) –Small-angle X-ray scattering curves for hydrosols filled by DND with negative ζ-potential, (b) – Kratky plot, the inset shows possible model of Bragg scattering.
Figure 5. CryoTEM image of 1.0 wt% DND hydrosol with negative ζ-potential (a). The distribution of interparticle distances are shown in the inset. CET 3D reconstruction of the hydrosol thin layer in different projections (b,c). 1
17
Figure 6. CryoTEM image of 1.0 wt% DND hydrosol with positive ζ-potential (a) with the distribution of interparticle distances in the inset. CET 3D reconstruction of the hydrosol thin layer under study (b,c). 1 2
TABLES
3
Table 1. The area of hysteresis loop for DND hydrosols at various concentrations. Sample, wt%
Ahyst., Pa/s
Enetwork, J/s
5.7 (ζ+)
80.3±3.7
(3.2±0.2)*10-16
7.3 (ζ+)
194.9±13.2
(6.1±0.4)*10-16
5.9 (ζ–)
78.3±10.3
(3.0±0.4)*10-16
6.9 (ζ–)
173.7±2.7
(5.8±0.1)*10-16
4 5
Table 2. Interplanar distances in DND hydrosols determined from SAXS data at various
6
concentrations and ζ-potential sign. ζ-potential negative
Concentration, wt%
Scattering distance (d), nm
1.0
–
2.0
67.5
18
positive
4.2
65.2
5.9
62.9
6.9
57.1
1.1
67.5
2.0
59.0
4.1
57.1
5.7
57.1
7.3
57.1
1 2
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
3
1.
Figure S1, tif.
4
2.
Table S2, text.
5
3.
Figure S3, tif.
6
4.
Figure S4, tif.
7
AUTHOR INFORMATION
8
Corresponding Author
9
*E-mail address:
[email protected] (Nikita M. Kuznetsov)
10
**E-mail address:
[email protected] (Alexander Ya. Vul')
11
Author Contributions
12
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval
13
to the final version of the manuscript.
14
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
15
Alexander Ya. Vul' and Elena B. Yudina thank the Russian Scientific Foundation (project N 14-
16
13-00795) for support.
17
Nikta M. Kuznetsov and Sergey I. Belousov, thank the RFBR for partial financial support
18
(project 18-29-19117).
19
1
The authors acknowledge support from the resource centers of organic and hybrid materials
2
“Polymer” and X-ray methods “Rentgen” of the National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”
3
for the possibility of rheological and X-ray structural studies.
4
ABBREVIATIONS
5
DND, detonation nanodiamond; 3ITT, three-interval thixotropic tests; NMR, nuclear magnetic
6
resonance; SAXS, small-angle X-ray scattering; CryoTEM, Cryo transmission electron
7
microscopy; CET, Cryo-Electron Tomography.
8
REFERENCES
9
[1]
nanodiamonds, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 (2012) 11–23. doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.209.
10 11
[2]
[3]
O.A. Williams, ed., Nanodiamond, The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2014. doi:10.1039/9781849737616.
14 15
A.Y. Vul, O.A. Shenderova, Detonation nanodiamonds - science and applications, Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2013. doi:10.4032/9789814411288.
12 13
V.N. Mochalin, O. Shenderova, D. Ho, Y. Gogotsi, The properties and applications of
[4]
A. V. Shvidchenko, E.D. Eidelman, A.Y. Vul’, N.M. Kuznetsov, D.Y. Stolyarova, S.I.
16
Belousov, S.N. Chvalun, Colloids of detonation nanodiamond particles for advanced
17
applications, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 268 (2019) 64–81. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2019.03.008.
18
[5]
1365–1379. doi:10.1351/pac200880071365.
19 20
E. Osawa, Monodisperse single nanodiamond particulates, Pure Appl. Chem. 80 (2008)
[6]
A.Y. Vul’, E.D. Eydelman, M. Inakuma, E. Osawa, Correlation between viscosity and
21
absorption of electromagnetic waves in an aqueous UNCD suspension, Diam. Relat.
22
Mater. (2007). doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2007.08.003.
23
[7]
O.A. Williams, J. Hees, C. Dieker, W. Jäger, L. Kirste, C.E. Nebel, Size-Dependent
24
Reactivity
25
doi:10.1021/nn100748k.
26
[8]
Diamond
Nanoparticles,
ACS
Nano.
4
(2010)
4824–4830.
A.E. Aleksenskiy, E.D. Eydelman, A.Y. Vul, Deagglomeration of detonation nanodiamonds, Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 3 (2011) 68–74. doi:10.1166/nnl.2011.1122.
27 28
of
[9]
A.T. Dideikin, A.E. Aleksenskii, M. V. Baidakova, P.N. Brunkov, M. Brzhezinskaya,
29
V.Y. Davydov, V.S. Levitskii, S. V. Kidalov, Y.A. Kukushkina, D.A. Kirilenko, V. V.
30
Shnitov, A. V. Shvidchenko, B. Senkovskiy, M.S. Shestakov, A.Y. Vul, Rehybridization
20
1
of carbon on facets of detonation diamond nanocrystals and forming hydrosols of
2
individual particles, Carbon N. Y. 122 (2017) 737–745. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.013.
3
[10]
4038–4041. doi:10.1039/B809188A.
4 5
A.S. Barnard, Self-assembly in nanodiamond agglutinates, J. Mater. Chem. 18 (2008)
[11]
A.Y. Vul, E.D. Eidelman, A.E. Aleksenskiy, A. V. Shvidchenko, A.T. Dideikin, V.S.
6
Yuferev, V.T. Lebedev, Y. V. Kul’velis, M. V. Avdeev, Transition sol-gel in
7
nanodiamond
8
doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.007.
9
[12]
hydrosols,
Carbon
N.
Y.
114
(2017)
242–249.
M. V Korobov, M.M. Batuk, N. V Avramenko, N.I. Ivanova, N.N. Rozhkova, E. Ōsawa,
10
Aggregate structure of “single-nano buckydiamond” in gel and dried powder by
11
differential scanning calorimetry and nitrogen adsorption, Diam. Relat. Mater. 19 (2010)
12
665–671. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2010.02.032.
13
[13]
2010. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0531-4.
14 15
[14]
C. Pang, J.W. Lee, Y.T. Kang, Review on combined heat and mass transfer characteristics in nanofluids, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 87 (2015) 49–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.07.017.
16 17
D. Ho, ed., Nanodiamonds: Applications in biology and nanoscale medicine, Springer US,
[15]
L.S. Sundar, M.K. Singh, E.V. Ramana, B. Singh, J. Grácio, A.C.M. Sousa, Enhanced
18
Thermal Conductivity and Viscosity of Nanodiamond-Nickel Nanocomposite Nanofluids,
19
Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 4039. doi:10.1038/srep04039.
20
[16]
R.A. Medina-Esquivel, C. Vales-Pinzon, G. Quiñones-Weiss, M.A. Zambrano-Arjona,
21
J.A. Mendez-Gamboa, C. Cab, J.J. Alvarado-Gil, Thermal conductivity of a diamond
22
magnetite composite fluid under the effect of a uniform magnetic field, Diam. Relat.
23
Mater. 53 (2015) 45–51. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2015.01.008.
24
[17]
Physics), 1986.
25 26
[18]
V. V Belyaev, The viscosity of nematic liquid crystals, Russ. Chem. Rev. 58 (1989) 917– 947. doi:10.1070/rc1989v058n10abeh003487.
27 28
L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, Third Edition: (Course of Theoretical
[19]
N.O. Mchedlov-Petrossyan, N.N. Kamneva, A.I. Marynin, A.P. Kryshtal, E. Osawa,
29
Colloidal properties and behaviors of 3 nm primary particles of detonation nanodiamonds
30
in
31
doi:10.1039/c5cp01405k.
aqueous
media,
Phys.
Chem.
Chem.
Phys.
17
(2015)
16186–16203.
21
1
[20]
N.M. Kuznetsov, S.I. Belousov, D.Y. Stolyarova, A. V. Bakirov, S.N. Chvalun, A. V.
2
Shvidchenko, E.D. Eidelman, A.Y. Vul’, Effect of diamond nanoparticle chains on
3
rheological properties of hydrosol, Diam. Relat. Mater. 83 (2018) 141–145.
4
doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2018.02.006.
5
[21]
Media, LLC, New-York, 2002.
6 7
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
N.J.
Wagner,
Thixotropy,
Interface
Sci.
(2009).
W. Haynes, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 97th ed., Taylor & Francis
[27]
S. V. Konyakhin, L. V. Sharonova, E.D. Eidelman, Labeling detonation nanodiamond suspensions
19
doi:10.1134/S1063785013030073. [28]
using
the
optical
methods,
Tech.
Phys.
Lett.
(2013).
V. Lebedev, Y. Kulvelis, A. Kuklin, A. Vul, Neutron Study of Multilevel Structures of Diamond Gels, Condens. Matter. (2016). doi:10.3390/condmat1010010.
21 22
Colloid
G. Schramm, A Practical Approach to Rheology and Rheometry, Karlsruhe : Gebrueder
18
20
Adv.
Group, LLC, 2017.
16 17
Mewis,
Haake GmbH, 1994.
14 15
J.
doi:10.1016/j.cis.2008.09.005.
12 13
A.Y. Malkin, A.I. Isayev, Rheology: Concepts, methods, and applications: Second edition, Elsevier, 2011. doi:10.1016/C2011-0-04626-4.
10 11
J. Livage, O. Pelletier, P. Davidson, Vanadium pentoxide sol and gel mesophases, J. SolGel Sci. Technol. 19 (2000) 275–278. doi:10.1023/A:1008713127620.
8 9
A. Pierre, Introduction to Sol-Gel Processing, 2nd printi, Springer Science + Business
[29]
A. V. Shvidchenko, A.N. Zhukov, A.T. Dideikin, M. V. Baidakova, M.S. Shestakov, V.
23
V. Shnitov, A.Y. Vul’, Electrosurface properties of single-crystalline detonation
24
nanodiamond particles obtained by air annealing of their agglomerates, Colloid J. 78
25
(2016) 235–241. doi:10.1134/S1061933X16020149.
26
[30]
L. Schmidlin, V. Pichot, M. Comet, S. Josset, P. Rabu, D. Spitzer, Identification,
27
quantification and modification of detonation nanodiamond functional groups, Diam.
28
Relat. Mater. 22 (2012) 113–117. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2011.12.009.
29
[31]
E.B. Yudina, A.E. Aleksenskii, I.G. Fomina, A. V. Shvidchenko, D.P. Danilovich, I.L.
30
Eremenko, A.Y. Vul, Interaction of Carboxyl Groups with Rare Metal Ions on the Surface
31
of Detonation Nanodiamonds, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019 (2019) 4345–4349.
22
doi:10.1002/ejic.201900607.
1 2
[32]
A. Krueger, Current issues and challenges in surface chemistry of nanodiamonds, in: J.C.
3
Arnault (Ed.), Nanodiamonds Adv. Mater. Anal. Prop. Appl., Elsevier, 2017: pp. 183–
4
233.
5
[33]
potential of nanodiamonds, Nanoscale. 9 (2017) 12549–12555. doi:10.1039/c7nr03200e.
6 7
L. Ginés, S. Mandal, Ashek-I-Ahmed, C.L. Cheng, M. Sow, O.A. Williams, Positive zeta
[34]
D. Franke, M. V. Petoukhov, P. V. Konarev, A. Panjkovich, A. Tuukkanen, H.D.T.
8
Mertens, A.G. Kikhney, N.R. Hajizadeh, J.M. Franklin, C.M. Jeffries, D.I. Svergun,
9
ATSAS 2.8: A comprehensive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from
10
macromolecular solutions, J. Appl. Crystallogr. (2017). doi:10.1107/S1600576717007786.
11
[35]
Appl. Crystallogr. 24 (1991) 414–435. doi:10.1107/S0021889891003400.
12 13
[36]
[37]
T. Pun, Entropic thresholding, a new approach, Comput. Graph. Image Process. (1981). doi:10.1016/0146-664X(81)90038-1.
16 17
D.W. Schaefer, R.S. Justice, How Nano Are Nanocomposites?, Macromolecules. 40 (2007) 8501–8517. doi:10.1021/ma070356w.
14 15
P.W. Schmidt, Small-angle scattering studies of disordered, porous and fractal systems, J.
[38]
J.N. Kapur, P.K. Sahoo, A.K.C. Wong, A new method for gray-level picture thresholding
18
using the entropy of the histogram., Comput. Vision, Graph. Image Process. 29 (1985)
19
273–285. doi:10.1016/0734-189X(85)90125-2.
20
[39]
A.A. Mikhutkin, R.A. Kamyshinsky, T.K. Tenchurin, А.D. Shepelev, A.S. Orekhov, T.E.
21
Grigoriev, V.G. Mamaguashvili, S.N. Chvalun, A.L. Vasiliev, Towards Tissue
22
Engineering: 3D Study of Polyamide-6 Scaffolds, Bionanoscience. 8 (2018) 511–521.
23
doi:10.1007/s12668-017-0493-0.
24 25 26
23
CRediT author statement Conceptualization: Alexander Ya. Vul'; Sergei N. Chvalun; Sergey I. Belousov; Writing: Nikita M. Kuznetsov; Resources: Elena B. Yudina; Methodology: Alexander L. Vasiliev; Artem V. Bakirov; Roman A. Kamyshinsky; Peter M. Tolstoy; Anton S. Mazur; Eugeny D. Eidelman: Formal analysis
Declaration of interests ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: